Hello,
I would like to have some advice on the subject above. We are in a
junction of moving from MF scheduling to Enterprise scheduling and it is
a good time to check our current solution. ESP looks a good solution for
our needs, and I would like to know how popular is this migration, How
Don't do it without GRS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS question - sharing DASD but not SMS environment
Absolutely,
Walt Farrell wrote:
On 9/18/2006 7:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am coming to suspect that the reason RETRY fails when I
invoke SMP/E from an EXEC under IKJEFT01 is that GIMSMP
is absent from AUTHPGM NAMES in SYS1.PARMLIB(IKJTSOnn).
I've put in a request to add it.
But, now I'm curious.
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:58:51 -0300 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/18/2006
: at 08:45 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:IEH utilities built its own DEB and other control blocks so that it
:could access the DASD device (it didn't go through
Thanks Roland. I have applied some service to the unicode FMID and I will
try again when I get a chance to IPL.
Jim McAlpine
On 9/19/06, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jim,
I remember their was a bug (e.g.APAR) because
CONVERSION 1140,1200; /* Latin-1 to UTF-16,
It appears that all task related storage, including loaded modules, are
released after the initialization routine ends despite the fact that the TCB
remains around.
The CDE points to freed storage.
The PC routines are defined.
Unfortunately the load module is gone.
Is there some documented
Michael
Based on my experience with IBM OSA features, the issue is *not* how to set
up the definition of your VIPAs but how you set up the definition of your
OSA features.
Here is an extract from some documentation I have which - I think - covers
the topic which is giving you trouble:
quote
IP
That sounds weird.
From what I can tell, there is nothing in Extended Addressability or
Auth Assembler to explain what you are seeing.
Is your init routine still waiting on EAEASWT? (sounds like it is as the
TCB is still hanging around)
Could you use IEFBR14 as the INIT routine and then put
Thanks for all the ideas and the offer. I'm not in a position to take
you up on the offer due to the fact that it would likely land me in hot
water (poached sysprog, anybody?).
Hot water? It would? That's...odd. :-)
I suppose asking the boss is out of the question? Or inviting him/her?
I wish
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:15:39 -0400 Rob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:That sounds weird.
:From what I can tell, there is nothing in Extended Addressability or
:Auth Assembler to explain what you are seeing.
Yes, an example would be nice.
:Is your init routine still waiting on EAEASWT? (sounds
snip
We want to share a few DASD among our four Lpars and have SMS
doing allocation. Each Lpar runs z/OS as a monoplex seperate
from the others. Two are 1.4 and two are 1.7 right now.
We do not have any kind of sysplex. Nor do we have an SMSplex,
whatever that is.
We would update SMS
John,
Would SMS for lpar-P get confused if SMS for lpar-D was allocating
a file on those dasd at the same time she was? Does SMS from one
lpar need to know what SMS from the other lpar is doing?
I don't know if this has changed but SMS tracks space allocations (tables
it somewhere) for
use in
As I understand you don't have sysplex. Several monplexes.
Been There Done That.
We use such transmission storage group without any problems. SMS
routines need *not* to be the same. We also keep UCAT BCS on the group.
What's important: no multi-system GRS (GRS=NONE), disks defined as
SHARED
Can you snap or dump after EAERIMWT is POSTed and then again after the
init routine has finished?
Do you have a decent debugger (z/XDC) ?
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
-Original
Zaromil,
Under these conditions, I agree with you. But Mr. Cullen wanted to
allocate from all sides and not DISNEW anything.
As Seymour would say, Not my dog.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of TISLER Zaromil
No, seriously. What's a RAMAC 3 worth today? snippage
How much is the data that is on the RAMAC 3 worth is probably the
underlying question.
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
PH: 770 621 3256
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 23:28 -0500, Michael Buckley wrote:
Hopefully someone can remember how VIPA can be set up when using Amdahl OSA
cards. It does not appear that multiple IP Addresses can be associated with
single device. Is there an alernate way to set this up then, or is it that
VIPA
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:16:12 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that all task related storage, including loaded modules, are
released after the initialization routine ends despite the fact that the
TCB
remains around.
Does ATTR=(...,KEEPRGN) on the ASCRE help? If so,
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:58:51 -0300
in those days there was no dynamic allocation (at least in MFT
PCP) not sure about MVT as I never was exposed to it.
Maybe in OS/360 release 1; certainly not in any release I ever saw. By
On 9/20/2006 3:25 AM, R.S. wrote:
I think the problem would be relieved (without re-design) by supplying
complete list of AUTHPGM'd programs from IBM. Or claim that any IBM
AC(1) program can be safely put on AUTHPGM list. Otherwise it is hard to
answer auditors' questions why is on the
On 9/19/2006 7:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps for this purpose AUTHPGM should govern only calling
programs from interactive sessions, and batch TMP should be
free to invoke any authorized program, listed or not.
Perhaps. Feel free to submit a formal requirement. Personally, I doubt
only 16 extents It was sure no extent related problems ... I don't
undestand .. whenever I am adding new volume based on requirement ... these
tablespaces are not being extended to newly added volumes and everytime I
hav to do REORG thereafter these tablespaces are getting extended to newly
Daniel A. McLaughlin wrote:
No, seriously. What's a RAMAC 3 worth today? snippage
How much is the data that is on the RAMAC 3 worth is probably the
underlying question.
However one of the methods to erase data is to destroy the media.
Destroying disk modules could be quite easy.
--
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:10:54 -0500, Richard Pinion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Loss of employment might make an impression.
Errare humanum est.
Sacking the poor guy (for all I know, he may just have a faulty keyboard on
which the 1 key is dead) will NOT prevent this type of event from happening
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:05:18 -0500 Andy Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:16:12 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:It appears that all task related storage, including loaded modules, are
:released after the initialization routine ends despite the fact that the
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:24:40 -0400 Rob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Can you snap or dump after EAERIMWT is POSTed and then again after the
:init routine has finished?
What would you be looking for?
I have had various abends during the development so that I am confident that
the ECBs are
However one of the methods to erase data is to destroy the media.
Destroying disk modules could be quite easy.
I understand that, but in a litigious world, and with SOX, etc., there may
be a directive to purge before destruction.
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
Daniel A. McLaughlin wrote:
However one of the methods to erase data is to destroy the media.
Destroying disk modules could be quite easy.
I understand that, but in a litigious world, and with SOX, etc., there
may
be a directive to purge before destruction.
I stronlgy doubt in such
My only intent was to play devil's advocate on this. Case in point. We had
the last active Honeywell 800 in the Air Force. It used 1 metal reel
tapes with plastic leaders. We started to run low, the call went out and
we got about 10,000 in from another site. We started out to check all
Thanks to All!
I now have a better understanding. Yes, we already run
SMS on all four lpars; Maybe only for USS on TEST lpar.
I will have to check if GRS is required, ring I think.
I have been bitten by that before. A Sysplex might be
required for a Star GRS.
An SMSplex would be one file
To get to the new volumes are you using DEL/DEFs or letting SMS manage the
space for DB2 using STOGROUPS.
What I know about DB2 and Extending can fit on a pin, however, here goes.
Depending on the VERSION of DB2 if you do an ADDVOL but did not have enough
canidate volumes in the list, they may
Hi, All,
Can somebody give me a ballpark time estimate per volume (assume full)
for JES2 offloading from 3390-3 DASD to 3592 tape?
TIA,
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:05:18 -0500 Andy Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:16:12 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:It appears that all task related storage, including loaded modules, are
:released after the initialization routine ends despite the fact that the
John,
It has been ten years since I did an offload from 3390-3s and that was
to 3490s, but I seem to recall somewhere around 25 minutes for a full
spool volume. My memory could be wrong, but 3592s are faster and so are
current DASD (assuming FICON, which I did not have then either).
Bob Richards
On 19 Sep 2006 13:21:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Marchant)
wrote:
The source data contains a valid sign. You will only get a S0C7 abend for
an
invalid sign.
Or an invalid numeric But you are still correct because the data
also contains valid numerics. As someone pointed out, spaces
John,
Yes, one shared ACS routine library, one shared SCDS, one shared ACDS
and one shared COMMDS with a HLQ that is in a shared usercat connected
to all the lpar mastercats. Update IGDSMSxx in all four SYS1.PARMLIBs to
specify the exact same names. Make a change to one and it is
automatically
John,
One question before you merge your SMS Control files.
Of the SMS managed volumes on your 4 LPARs which are not going to be
shared, do you have any duplicate vol sers?
As I understood your original post you only wanted to share a small
subset of SMS managed volumes between LPARs.
Just
Walt Farrell wrote:
IBM ships an IKJTSO00 with our set of programs listed in AUTHPGM. If
the auditor asks you a question, you merely need to see whether the
program is one we put in the list upon installation or one you added.
Many IBM commands/programs are missing from the lists shipped in
What about doing OCOPY under TSO to a HFS file?
No idea how OCOPY is configured at this site... but entering a TSO
OCOPY
from the command line gives me
ENTER INPUT DDNAME -
NODE1.NODE2.DSNAME
INVALID INPUT DDNAME, NODE1.NODE2.DSNAME
REENTER THIS OPERAND+ -
'NODE1.NODE2.DSNAME'
INVALID
We got in our 1.7 order, 3 compressed 3590 tapes. Challenge: we have no
external drives capable of this density. If the tapes have internal
labels, and I have no matching bar-coded external labels to affix to them,
how can I read them in my ATL?
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
In a message dated 9/20/2006 12:01:37 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No idea how OCOPY is configured at this site... but entering a TSO
OCOPY
from the command line gives me
RTFM?
3.TSOOCOPY.6 Examples
1. The following commands copy an MVS sequential
Our 3494 has a Load Unlabeled Tape function for just that purpose. There
is a panel where you enter the volser and which slot in the convenience
station. The ATL then puts it in a slot an remembers where it is stored.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700
Thanks to Mark I have an answer!
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
PH: 770 621 3256
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
In a message dated 9/20/2006 12:23:21 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
external drives capable of this density. If the tapes have internal
labels, and I have no matching bar-coded external labels to affix to them,
how can I read them in my ATL?
There's a Red Book
I am giving you some more details with regard to my problem...
Database Storage Group Definition:
CREATE STOGROUP STGP1 VOLUMES(PDB001)
VCAT DBSTGP;
In the SMS There is storage group named DBSTGP and volumes included under
this storage group are
PDB001
PDB002
PDB003
PDB004
PDB005
When these 5
The answer is:
Go to the operator console on the ATL, hit the Commands pull down.
Select Insert Unlabeled Cartridges, enter the VOLSER to be used in the
related cell slot for the convenience door, and load the tapes in there in
that order. Select OK and away it goes. When it's done, cancel
Daniel,
You may have to alter the CBRUXENT Cartridge Installation Exit to allow foreign
tapes at your site as well. Also, if memory serves me, you also have to go to
the Unassigned Tapes and do an Insert then click Take Action to get it in
the ATL database. The Unassigned Tapes panel
You may have to alter the CBRUXENT Cartridge Installation Exit to
allow foreign tapes at your site as well. Also, if memory serves me, you
also have to go to the Unassigned Tapes and do an Insert then click
Take Action to get it in the ATL database. The Unassigned Tapes
panel usually pops
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:48:05 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
Can somebody give me a ballpark time estimate per volume (assume full)
for JES2 offloading from 3390-3 DASD to 3592 tape?
You could test this yourself without deleting anything. Just remember that
if you use
On Sep 20, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:58:51 -0300 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/18/2006
: at 08:45 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:IEH utilities built its own DEB and other control blocks so that it
Also found out that I had to alter the attributes of my volumes.
Alter
Private
SGTAPLIB for our site.
Then it's good to go.
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
PH: 770 621 3256
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:13:46 +0530, Jacky Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am giving you some more details with regard to my problem...
Database Storage Group Definition:
CREATE STOGROUP STGP1 VOLUMES(PDB001)
VCAT DBSTGP;
In the SMS There is storage group named DBSTGP and volumes included
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:48:05 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Hi, All,
Can somebody give me a ballpark time estimate per volume (assume
full) for JES2 offloading from 3390-3 DASD to 3592 tape?
You
Hello,
I can't find the dll files libdb2jcct2.so and libdb2jcct2zos.so in
/usr/lpp/db2/db2710/jcc/lib. In fact the files don't exist in any directory.
DB2 version 7.1 was installed in 2002. All the jobs to define DDDEF entries and
to make the directory were run. All PTFs related to JDBC
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:06:33 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:48:05 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Hi, All,
Can somebody give me a ballpark time estimate per volume
Jacky,
I believe for DB2 stogroups to use SMS the DB2 stogroup should be defined
as VOLUMES('*') for it to work the way you wish with the proper ACS
routines. We are not SMS managed so I am not sure how to accomplish this. I
would try an ALTER STOGROUP STGP1 REMOVE VOLUMES (PDB001) followed
We have DB2 V8 in compatibility mode on 2 separate LPARS on 2 separate
Z9 boxes. We can run a stats job on the same tables, same DASD, same XCF
with structures and ECS catalogs but one job finishes in 1/3 the time.
No, the boxes are not equal and no the workload is not equal either but
our
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
Can somebody give me a ballpark time estimate per volume (assume full) for
JES2 offloading from 3390-3 DASD to 3592 tape?
It depends?
Results are presented from controlled laboratory experiments and may vary in
the real world.
No expression of warranty is implied, or promised, in the
I seem to remember that DB2 would not alter add volume if the volume was
already in the allocation. I think the crucial error is not having the DB2
stogroup defined as colume (*) - which will never match an existing volume.
That will force it to the SMS allocation.
Mike
On 9/20/06, Robert
For those of us who are mentally challenged, where might I find sample
JCL, and instructions on how to extract the system log information to a
file for a given time frame?
Member names, and manual names (perhaps chapters too?) would be helpful.
I have a level 2 support staff member asking me
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 09/20/2006
11:21:40 AM:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:05:18 -0500 Andy Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:16:12 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:It appears that all task related storage, including
Mark wrote:
For those of us who are mentally challenged, where might I find sample
JCL, and instructions on how to extract the system log information to
a file for a given time frame?
Member names, and manual names (perhaps chapters too?) would be helpful.
I have a level 2 support staff
In addition to what Mr. Gray said (I don't know if he's right, though!),
but how are you searching for these dlls (that you know they aren't there)?
Your SMPE apply really should have failed if they didn't get somewhere (I
think that would be an even worse problem). And, they are more than
I find the SDSF approach the easiest. I use the PRINT ODSN dsn, PRINT
first_line last_line, and PRINT CLOSE. Details in the SDSF Guide and
Reference.
-Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
*What* SDSF Guide and Reference? That book is no longer published. :)
Bob
Schwarz, Barry A wrote:
I find the SDSF approach the easiest. I use the PRINT ODSN dsn, PRINT
first_line last_line, and PRINT CLOSE. Details in the SDSF Guide and
Reference.
Hello,
By any chance is there an OPEN EDITION list server?
Dave Schaeffer
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Dave Schaeffer wrote:
By any chance is there an OPEN EDITION list server?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
THe Amdahl OSA is not capable of QDIO, it is in fact defined as an LCS
device. This means both the real IP Address and the VIPA need to be difned
to the OSA to get it to route correctly. On an IBM OSA this is done by
updating the OSA configuration (OAT) with both addresses. For the Amdahl
card
Radoslaw,
I see no one answered your post from 9-18. Unfortuneatly, I won't either.
I did have a question though. Does the IODF have to be in one extent? I
don't recall hearing that rule.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original Message
My experience is that if the IODF is allocated in more than one extent it is
unusuable for system IPL/Dynamic Acitivation. This my be different on more
current levels of the operating system, we are OS/390 2.4/2.10.
Bob Rankin
-Original Message-
From: Eric N. Bielefeld [mailto:[EMAIL
I've been RTFM and I can't find it.
I'm packaging our exits as USERMODS. I made some mistakes and I now
have bogus GENASM entries on some JES2 macros. I can't seem to find a
way to tell SMP/E 3.4 to remove them.
Is there a way short of restore from backup to do this? If not, I
guess I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: The ASCRE initialization routine
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on
The IODF must be in one extent or it will not be usable.
Regards,
Doug Shupe
- Original Message -
From: Rankin, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: DSS RESTORE - how to enforce CONTIG
Hi,
I'm at a DR test right now and one of the operators showed me this command in
SDSF. You hit SHIFT and PF7 and an ampersand appears on the command you type in
a time interval (in seconds) and a message appears on the command: AUTO
UPDATE (with the time interval you selected) . This
That is standard SDSF. The actual command is x, where x is the refresh
interval. I suspect shift F7 simply maps to PF19, and if you look at the
definition for that key you will probably see an x command.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/20/2006
at 07:46 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But that leaves open the question of why
it doesn't exploit the catalog when no VOL is supplied.
It does, in a truly grotesque fashion. It does a LOCATE, the searches
the TIOT for a ddname allocated to
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/20/2006
at 07:55 AM, Robert Bardos [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As I have never worked with OPC nor setup jobs that were submitted by
OPC I simply added variable OCDATE at the relevant places in the
INCLUDE member.
It's been a while since I did ^M, but my recollection
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2006
at 10:27 PM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There is no SAF call to see if the particular user can invoke the
particular program in authorized mode.
Your point? There is a control for whether any user can execute the
program authorized. Why does it
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2006
at 07:54 PM, Russell Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The reason for the same FMID's is because while we are changing the
release number; it can be done with a simple maintenance upgrade. For
example, going from R5.2 to R11.0 or even to R11.5 does NOT require a
cool !! thanks.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Buckley, Michael J
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF Question
That is standard SDSF. The actual command is x, where x is
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 09/20/2006
07:59:55 PM:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: The
Jim Mulder/Poughkeepsie/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/20/2006 10:16:21 PM:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 09/20/2006
07:59:55 PM:
As to why subpool 0 is shared, I haven't been able to think
of a reason. I don't know of anything that the initiator
obtains in
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:57:37 -0700, Rankin, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My experience is that if the IODF is allocated in more than one extent it is
unusuable for system IPL/Dynamic Acitivation.
An IODF can be dynamically activated if it is in multiple extents, but it
can't be used at IPL time.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:22:40 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been RTFM and I can't find it.
I'm packaging our exits as USERMODS. I made some mistakes and I now
have bogus GENASM entries on some JES2 macros. I can't seem to find a
way to tell SMP/E 3.4 to remove them.
Is
Jim said
If subpool 0 was not shared, then the EXEC PARM= parameter storage
would be the only thing in its 4K page (or its 2K page in the
old days). The rest of the page would be wasted. Sharing subpool
allows the jobsteb program to obtain the subpool 0 storage
remaining on this page.
In a message dated 9/20/2006 8:04:36 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is standard SDSF. The actual command is x, where x is the refresh
interval. I suspect shift F7 simply maps to PF19, and if you look at the
definition for that key you will probably see an x
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:22:40 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I've been RTFM and I can't find it.
I'm packaging our exits as USERMODS. I made some mistakes and I now
have bogus GENASM entries on some JES2 macros. I can't seem to find a
way to tell SMP/E 3.4 to remove them.
Is there a way short
88 matches
Mail list logo
