Edward Jaffe wrote:
R.S. wrote:
... But it is even harder to convince anyone to spend money on
mainframe HW and then pay MLC bills for software.
Ask IBMers how often TSM server is on z/OS nowadays. And why.
(ok, you likely won't get an answer)
We run TSM on z/OS. It's IPLA, not MLC.
Yes, bu
Hi,
Could some one please help me in this in this , I need a Rexx routine to be
executed in the job so that that the file will be created for eg
Userid.abc ie the userid should be appended before the file name.
PUT “abc.inv.rpt” userid.txt
Close
exit
Thanks,
Ron
It's not a crazy thought. At least I don't think so, for what it's worth.
The idea came up in passing recently when a student working on a final
project asked for some ideas. One of my suggestions was exactly along these
lines.
To expand on those previous thoughts:
1. There's no EBCDIC requiremen
At 19:34 -0600 on 11/11/2008, Russell Witt wrote about Re:
Differences in IEFTMS7 and IEFTMS8:
So, if you want to assume that the system-date is always correct and
eliminate the WTOR's simply add PARM=NODATE to the TMSINIT proc.
This still does not answer the question that was raised about wh
Another vote for T-Rex. Installation literally takes 15 minutes and it works
like a champ. We use it for regular cat backups and have done many
concurrent cat reorgs with no issues. Support is same day.
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 01:20:51 -0600, Magen Margalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>We a
Anyone attending CA World in Las Vegas? Would love to get together with some
of the mainframe posters and lurkers if there are.
Russell Witt
CA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMA
Tom,
You are absolutely correct; no harm running TMSINIT as often as you want
(with tape processing active). I have seen some sites run TMSINIT twice a
day. They wanted to change subpool definitions on a shift-by-shift basis
(never did understand that one at all).
To be honest, I had to go back t
Figures don't lie, but liars will figure. Smacks of "management by
airline magazine", with a generous dose of marketting "Male Bovine
Excrement".
John McKown wrote:
I don't know how accurate it is, but I found it interesting.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/11/hp_chases_mainframes/
--
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:34:01 -0600, Russell Witt wrote:
>
>Second (to address Tom's and Richard's complaint) we did realize that IPL's
>were not done on a regular weekly basis at all sites anymore. We added a
>PARM=NODATE to TMSINIT years ago to prevent any WTOR's from being
>issued. With PARM=N
Okay, I am going to try to address all the comments and mis-information
supplied in a single email.
First, as others have correctly identified; the combination of IEFTMS7/3/8 all
come together when the last time that TMSINIT was run on any system sharing the
TMC was more then 8-days ago. If the
Is there any sample HCD/IOCP how to code a dummy LPAR?
We just change the * to the real name, assign I/O resources,
then do a hardware activate. You would now see your new LPAR on the HMC and
you can customize the profile for it.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:28 AM, John McKown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
You remember correctly, those messages have been with the product since
UCC1 days.
Linda Mooney wrote:
If I remember correctly (and I don't remember if I do ;-), this may have been with the product since UCC1 days. Anyway, (and this I definitely remember), years ago we used to run without any
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:40:50 -0500, David Andrews wrote:
>On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 14:47 -0600, Rich Smrcina wrote:
>> Why re-invent the wheel on z/OS?
>
>Because that's where the data is. (Or "are", for John Gilmore.)
>
Because that's where the SVCs is. I'd love to be able to
ATTACH GIMSMP, GIMZIP
R.S. wrote:
... But it is even harder to convince anyone to spend money on
mainframe HW and then pay MLC bills for software.
Ask IBMers how often TSM server is on z/OS nowadays. And why.
(ok, you likely won't get an answer)
We run TSM on z/OS. It's IPLA, not MLC.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Sof
John,
I think it looks pretty easy, I have written scripting languages , I think
before dinos roamed the earth ( lol )so even shell script isn't so hard
for me..but that's me..easy to used and config is goodness to me...
This is the way I am writing our products.
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Eng
This question has great potential for a really long IBM-MAIN thread :-)
Is it a question about:
- how to store a PDF in a dataset?
- how to load PDFs into DB2?
- how to transfer a PDF to a mainframe dataset?
- how to process DB2 LOBs in COBOL ?
Pick your favorite aspect, or anything slightly rela
John McKown pisze:
[...]
But I can't run it. Why? We won't get an IFL. It costs too much. We can't
run it on a CP because we don't have the excess power. And, in any case, it
increases our z/OS MSUs and thus our z/OS software bill. It is cheaper to
run Linux on Intel. And so on. Oh, and despite t
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:51:15 -0600, Kirk Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>John,
>
>Kirk Wolf
>Dovetailed Technologies
>
>P.S. With obvious bias I would have to disagree that co-processing
>between z/OS and z/Linux is difficult.
> How hard is this? - http://dovetail.com/docs/coz/cookbook.html
If I remember correctly (and I don't remember if I do ;-), this may have been
with the product since UCC1 days. Anyway, (and this I definitely remember),
years ago we used to run without any UPS whatsoever, not in any form. We took
hard power hits fairly often and the machine would forget wha
John,
I think you have an interesting idea, but also seem like a lot of work
to implement for unknown demand.
What about another approach: why couldn't hypervisor support (ala
z/VM) be built into z/OS? Then you might be able to
run z/Linux virtual machines under a z/OS blanket with perhaps more
It's not crazy, it's just that it would be a TON of work, with
unproven requirement/return, and where most folks would say "Run in an
IFL". "Where the data is" doesn't really do much for me -- an IFL in
the same box over HiperSockets isn't very far away, and offers all the
usual benefits of z.
On
On 11 Nov 2008 12:44:31 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R.S.)
wrote:
>Pay me, and I'll tell you what you want
>More seriously, I believe that HP's words are true *in some sense*. I
>also believe it is definitely not true, that avg 100 mainframes shops
>per year were gone. No. Rather avg. 100 customer
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 14:47 -0600, Rich Smrcina wrote:
> Why re-invent the wheel on z/OS?
Because that's where the data is. (Or "are", for John Gilmore.)
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAI
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:09:52 +0100, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes. Reserved LPARs. Actually I never used this feature (it is available
>since z/OS 1.6 AFAIK), however I don't understand it.
>In my understanding I always had the feature: it is enough to create
>LPARs, assign (or not) some C
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:13:05 -0500, Lizette Koehler wrote:
IEFTMS7 IPL DATE MORE THAN 8 DAYS FROM LAST IPL
IEFTMS3 PREVIOUS IPL DATE = date
IEFTMS8 VERIFY DATE = date OR 'HELP'
Reason: The current system date is eight or more days beyond the
last BrightStor CA-1
initializ
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:47:00 -0600, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What tools are you looking for?
What ones do you have? . I like GNU's versions of almost all the
"standard" stuff: bash, gawk, grep, make. ... Where such exist, they are
never up to date.
>
>Why re-invent the wheel on
Tony Harminc wrote:
... The Reg has also bought into IBM's line about "speciality engines"
being some sort of performance enhancers for Java, Linux, and so on,
rather than just a scheme for maintaining market differentiation
between Classic and New workloads.
But, specialty engines *do* enha
John McKown pisze:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:56:05 -0600, Hal Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The last time I checked, adding an LPAR still requires a full power on
reset. Like any LPAR, it will need resources such as main memory to be
allocated.
No. In the current HCD, you can create any num
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pommier, Rex R.) writes:
> I concur also. I wonder what year my company was included in the "250
> per 2 years" statistic. We brought in a brand-spanking-new HP
> sup
>Pesky users. Keeping the REAL reason for Mainframes obscured.
END USER is still missing in the z/Arch instruction set.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:13:05 -0500, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>IEFTMS7 IPL DATE MORE THAN 8 DAYS FROM LAST IPL
>IEFTMS3 PREVIOUS IPL DATE = date
>IEFTMS8 VERIFY DATE = date OR 'HELP'
>Reason: The current system date is eight or more days beyond the
>last BrightStor CA-1
>initialization date.
>Actio
Pesky users. Keeping the REAL reason for Mainframes obscured.
Ken Porowski
AVP Systems Software
CIT Group
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
R.S.
Last but not least: we use mainframes, but our business use
*applications*. Yes, indeed, our lovely mainframes are *not* for
Parallel
John McKown wrote:
We (well, me) are always complaining how the z/OS UNIX tools simply are
not a good or plentiful as the ones on GNU/Linux. So I had a weird
thought. Why not create a program on z/OS UNIX, in the WINE tradition,
which can load z/Linux binaries and have support DLLs which implem
Dave Salt pisze:
An interesting article indeed. For those who haven't read it, here are some
statements that caught my eye:
- HP announced today that in the past two years, it has helped more than 250 customers worldwide to migrate from mainframes to Integrity-based servers.
- HP has been ch
We (well, me) are always complaining how the z/OS UNIX tools simply are
not a good or plentiful as the ones on GNU/Linux. So I had a weird
thought. Why not create a program on z/OS UNIX, in the WINE tradition,
which can load z/Linux binaries and have support DLLs which implement the
Linux ABI?
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:56:05 -0600, Hal Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The last time I checked, adding an LPAR still requires a full power on
>reset. Like any LPAR, it will need resources such as main memory to be
>allocated.
No. In the current HCD, you can create any number of "placeholder"
The last time I checked, adding an LPAR still requires a full power on
reset. Like any LPAR, it will need resources such as main memory to be
allocated.
Perhaps you'd want to look at a VM based solution.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Going to have to go with IBM on this one. Those workloads are very CPU
intensive and would be hugely expensive under classic mainframe pricing
schemes. Not only would you need a lot more raw horse power, but your
other vendors will want to charge you more as well.
Designating some engines as ou
Ed Jaffe of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote
on 11/11/2008 01:27:16 PM:
> > Over the years, I have personally made use of SHOWMVS, BYPASSNQ,
> > RECALL, PDS, REVIEW, AUTO, TSSO, TASID, MXI, XMITIP, ASM2ZAP and
> > others. I suspect most everyone reading this has a similar list to
share.
>
2008/11/11 Dave Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So if HP alone is converting more than 250 mainframe shops every 2 years,
> then at least
> 1,000 mainframe shops will be gone over the next 8 years? Ouch! Someone
> please tell me
> this isn't true?
When HP claims "it has helped more than 250 custome
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Over the years, I have personally made use of SHOWMVS, BYPASSNQ,
RECALL, PDS, REVIEW, AUTO, TSSO, TASID, MXI, XMITIP, ASM2ZAP and
others. I suspect most everyone reading this has a similar list to share.
Here are a few additions I received via off-list email: LISTPDS,
TAPE
Look into the SHOWzOS distribution www.cbttape.org. It contains a JCL to
generate a PDF and transfer this MVS dataset to your PC.
Roland
>Sorry, there was a typo in the title.
>
>-- Forwarded message --
>From: Jim McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:02 PM
Historically the linking of PL/I programs was slightly complicated because
there were two versions of certain library routines, one for COBOL-like
single-task applications and another for multitasking ones. These routines,
located in two different libraries, had the same names.
The scheme use
Counter-Point
http://www.clabbyanalytics.com/uploads/HPvsIBMFinalFinalFinal.pdf
http://www.clabbyanalytics.com/Free_Reports_Critiques.html
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
System z Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAI
I concur also. I wonder what year my company was included in the "250
per 2 years" statistic. We brought in a brand-spanking-new HP superdome
back in 2001 as our mainframe (a 7060H50!!) killer. As per my CTO back
then "don't do any maintenance to the mainframe because it will be gone
in 3 years"
Concur. When I read the article my 'male bovine excrement' alarms went
off. It is clearly (to me, anyway) based on facts as perceived by HP
marketing.
And we all know how marketing perceives and conveys 'facts' ;-)
As would most Inquiring Minds, I'd like to know the reality. But I doubt
that's g
Jim McAlpine wrote:
Sorry, there was a typo in the title.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jim McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:02 PM
Subject: string a PDF file in DB2 for z/OS
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
We are looking at storing PDF files as DB2 B
Dave Salt wrote:
So if HP alone is converting more than 250 mainframe shops every 2 years, then at least 1,000 mainframe shops will be gone over the next 8 years? Ouch! Someone please tell me this isn't true?
Let me state up front that I do not trust the Register. Never have...
The artic
So if HP alone is converting more than 250 mainframe shops every 2 years,
then at least 1,000 mainframe shops will be gone over the next 8 years?
Ouch! Someone please tell me this isn't true?
Dave Salt
hmmm, sounds like more "management by airport magazine" hype.
Don't believe everything you
An interesting article indeed. For those who haven't read it, here are some
statements that caught my eye:
- HP announced today that in the past two years, it has helped more than 250
customers worldwide to migrate from mainframes to Integrity-based servers.
- HP has been chasing IBM and othe
I am trying to determine what the difference in response to these two CA1
messages are. The CA1 Messages manual has
IEFTMS7 IPL DATE MORE THAN 8 DAYS FROM LAST IPL
IEFTMS3 PREVIOUS IPL DATE = date
IEFTMS8 VERIFY DATE = date OR 'HELP'
Reason: The current system date is eight or more days beyond th
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:39:11 -0600, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
>Well, DB2 ships with a PDF file in the DSN!!0.SDSNIVPD dataset, member
>DSNDR, and it is a VB dataset, lrecl=8188.
>
8188? 8096? What motivates these numbers? 3390 track geometry.
What's SDSNIVPD's BLKSIZE?
-- gil
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:34:52 -0800, Jack wrote:
>If I create a PDF file with SAS and don't specify attributes, it assigns
>
>Organization . . . : PS
>Record format . . . : VB
>Record length . . . : 259
>Block size . . . . : 27998
>
>I have also used LRECL=8096,BLKSIZE=0.
>
I suppose it depends l
Well, DB2 ships with a PDF file in the DSN!!0.SDSNIVPD dataset, member
DSNDR, and it is a VB dataset, lrecl=8188.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jim
In most every shop I've worked in, we created some form of SYSx.NULLFILE
and/or SYSx.NULLPDS. So I agree, it would be nice if z/OS supplied them.
For over 30 years I thought that a DD DUMMY in a PDS concatenation should
act as a empty PDS and not a EOF, but IBM did not ask me. I have never seen
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:08:32 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:56:53 -0600, Staller, Allan wrote:
>
>>Try DSN=NULLFILE. See the JCL manuals...
>
>//TEST EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
>//STEPLIB DD DSN=NULLFILE
>// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.LINKLIB
>
>results in
>IEC141I 013-64,IFG0
If I create a PDF file with SAS and don't specify attributes, it assigns
Organization . . . : PS
Record format . . . : VB
Record length . . . : 259
Block size . . . . : 27998
I have also used LRECL=8096,BLKSIZE=0.
--
Jack Hamilton
Management Information & Analysis - Analytic Information Ser
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:56:53 -0600, Staller, Allan wrote:
>Try DSN=NULLFILE. See the JCL manuals...
//TEST EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//STEPLIB DD DSN=NULLFILE
// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.LINKLIB
results in
IEC141I 013-64,IFG0196J,PMITCM0L,TEST,STEPLIB,,,NULLFILE
"An OPEN macro instruction w
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:28:37 -0600, Jimmy Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm looking for the samples to setup RACF protection on initiators. It's been a
>while since last implementation. I thought there was something on the CBT
>tape. Searches of the CBT and archieves have not been kind to me.
Sorry, there was a typo in the title.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jim McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:02 PM
Subject: string a PDF file in DB2 for z/OS
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
We are looking at storing PDF files as DB2 BLOB data and I have so
We are looking at storing PDF files as DB2 BLOB data and I have some info on
the COBOL programming aspect from a DB2 redbook. However we first have to
get the PDF file stored in an MVS dataset. Obviously we can FTP the file
but what would the attributes of the MVS dataset look like. Has anyone d
While I agree that the elapsed time of a batch job is subject
to some uncontrollable variation, it, or more accurately, a
subset of the job elapsed time, the step residency time, can
indeed be used to compare before and after changes in many cases,
especially when there was a significant improveme
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:46:05 +1100, Graeme Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>Is it only me.. or do those all seem to be far too underwhelmingly
>weak, pathetically scripted and produced and downright boring to be
>effective "hooks" for catching the attention of anyone other than we
>rusted-o
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:27:09 -0600, Staller, Allan wrote:
>It is, but it fools the converter/interperter into thinking there really
>is a dataset there and allows the concatenation to proceed, as opposed
>to DD DUMMY which "truncates" the concatenation.
>
I remain open to persuasion, although John
I'm looking for the samples to setup RACF protection on initiators. It's been a
while since last implementation. I thought there was something on the CBT
tape. Searches of the CBT and archieves have not been kind to me. Thanks in
advance for all help.
Jimmy
-
Did not see the original posting. If you are looking for a decrease in elapsed
(clock) time, then that is the only metric of any interest. However, as others
suggest, clock time can be expected to vary with transaction load and the
overall load on the environment. You might want to build a refer
I don't know how accurate it is, but I found it interesting.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/11/hp_chases_mainframes/
--
John
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
This is my idea, for whatever it may be worth. I would create a proc with
something like:
//SYSLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=some.empty.pds
// INCLUDE MEMBER=prelibs
// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=first.standard.library
// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=second.standard.library
//* OTHER STANDARD LIBRA
If anybody out there is using CA-JMR to archive their job JCL type output, I
have a question. I cannot find any way to determine how big the MASTER,
ALTERN, and HOLD datasets should be. The example show TRK,(1,1), but that
just doesn't seem to be reasonable.
Any help?
--
John
---
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
>
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:22:40 +0100, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote:
>
> >Try this:
> >
> >//SYSLIBDD DDNAME=OWNSYSLB
> >// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=APPL.PROD.COPYLIB
> >//*
> >//OWNSYSLB DD DISP
>>//OWNSYSLB DD DISP=(NEW,KEEP),DSN=&&OWNSYSLB,
>>// SPACE=(TRK,(1,,1)),RECFM=U,LRECL=32760
>>//*
>I don't know about KEEP on a temporary DSN; I'd be more
>comfortable with PASS. But I'm very uncomfortable with
>DELETE in a PROC. It has bad effects when I override with
>a catalogued d
It is, but it fools the converter/interperter into thinking there really
is a dataset there and allows the concatenation to proceed, as opposed
to DD DUMMY which "truncates" the concatenation.
Agreed, the effect at execution time is the same.
>Try DSN=NULLFILE. See the JCL manuals...
>
We had th
Boy's
It's enough now . . . . . .
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Howard Brazee
Skickat: den 11 november 2008 16:00
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: Former Marines
On 10 Nov 2008 19:26:55 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacN
PLEASE!
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN IN
On 10 Nov 2008 19:26:55 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
>In the early 1960's, we had a Prime Minister who won a Nobel Peace Prise.
>How many American presidents have one?
Three
>Oh, and, how much money does the US owe the UN?
The US paid more to the UN than any other country.
>So
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:34:57 +0100, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
>I got it. It's not a command, but a change to vtamlst. then a command. but
>not until vtamlst is changed.
>
>-Original Message-
>
>I've added more devices to my machine (through VM CP DEFINE GRAPH ). But
>the D U,GRAPHIC
On 10 Nov 2008 19:07:29 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Savor, Tom) wrote:
>>Bull droppings. American jinogoism.
>>And, another example of the US only knowing about US history.
>>We participated in WWII.
>>And, while your military rushed to France, we stopped to free Holland.
>>And, that is recognised e
I got it. It's not a command, but a change to vtamlst. then a command. but
not until vtamlst is changed.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lindy Mayfield
Sent: 11. marraskuuta 2008 9:48
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: What
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:56:53 -0600, Staller, Allan wrote:
>Try DSN=NULLFILE. See the JCL manuals...
>
We had this discussion about a year ago. At that time everyone
except John Gilmore agreed that both according to the JCL
manuals and empirically DSN=NULLFILE is quite indistinguishable
from DUMMY
Try DSN=NULLFILE. See the JCL manuals...
I sure wish DUMMY didn't truncate the concatenation, but
were treated as an empty directory (DSORG=PO), or data set
(DSORG=PS), allowing subsequent catenands to be searched
or read.
Or that there were an alternative keword (DD EMPTY) with that
behavior.
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:22:40 +0100, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote:
>Try this:
>
>//SYSLIBDD DDNAME=OWNSYSLB
>// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=APPL.PROD.COPYLIB
>//*
>//OWNSYSLB DD DISP=(NEW,KEEP),DSN=&&OWNSYSLB,
>// SPACE=(TRK,(1,,1)),RECFM=U,LRECL=32760
>
I sure wish DUMMY didn't truncat
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:22:40 +0100, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote:
>Try this:
>
>//SYSLIBDD DDNAME=OWNSYSLB
>// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=APPL.PROD.COPYLIB
>//*
>//OWNSYSLB DD DISP=(NEW,KEEP),DSN=&&OWNSYSLB,
>// SPACE=(TRK,(1,,1)),RECFM=U,LRECL=32760
>//*
I don't know about KEEP on a
Ken
It seems that the answer to your first question is "Yes" even if some can't
quite match your precise distance.
However, as a response to your second sentence, may I pose a question -
Why?
Given the configuration, software and protocols involved, I can see no reason
to imagine there even m
>Curious to know if there was a hidden gem here somewhere, I clicked
>through to zcandoit.com and found myself at
>http://www.squidoo.com/zcandoit,
Ditto here. Seemed to me it is a hidden spam type website.
>Who is doing this cr*p? And why did they bother?
This is indeed cr*p. This is really
84 matches
Mail list logo
