Yes. One option is CICS Transaction Server. CICS has XML-Signature
capability as a standard, no additional charge feature. This is part of
CICS's support for WS-Security.
WS-Security support started in CICS Transaction Server V3.1 (as a
retrofit), and of course it is also in newer releases (and
McKown, John jmck...@healthmarkets.com wrote in message
news:a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea0025eb88...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom.
..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Sent: Wednesday, June 10,
William Bishop bill.bis...@tema.toyota.com wrote in message
news:ofadc89ed9.853d8cdc-on852575d1.005318e6-852575d1.00535...@tema.toy
ota.com...
I have a request. I am working to try and get management to let me
clean
up some old tapes in preparation for a potential library replacement
and
I think shifting over to encrypted connections is a perfect time to shift
users over to something more easily managed than fat client emulators.
It's no fun reconfiguring hundreds or thousands of desktops, and taking
unnecessary support calls -- and discovering that scores or hundreds
require
Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote in message
news:listserv%200906101459283831.0...@bama.ua.edu...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:08:09 -0500, Scott Fagen
scottfagen...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is documented in the GRS Planning Guide:
SYSDSN:
Hi,
My client is moving from one Vir-tape (VT1) to another vir-tape system(VT2).
HSM uses Tape duplexing.
The plan is to use:
site1: primary HSM tapes:
VT1-1 : tape volser : 1*
VT2-1 : tape volser : 5*
site2: alternate HSM tapes:
VT1-2 : tape volser : 0*
VT2-2 : tape volser : 4*
If HSM
I might as well just post the major (4-digit) model numbers here, starting
with z900 (the first 64-bit machine, introduced in late 2000) and leading
to System z10:
2064: z900
2066: z800
2084: z990
2086: z890
2094: z9 EC
2096: z9 BC
2097: z10 EC
2098: z10 BC
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM
Dave Butts dave.w.bu...@lowes.com wrote in message
news:listserv%200906101506546047.0...@bama.ua.edu...
It was an OS problem after all, and not due to the MCLs.
APAR OA29370 has been opened.
We have been over the 65535 device boundry for a long time, but the
bug
became exposed when I
Also probably getting off topic, but is there anything particularly wrong
with CL/SUPERSESSION? IBM still supports it, and there is no end of service
planned.
If for some reason there is something wrong with CL/SUPERSESSION, there is
a one-for-one trade option to switch to IBM Session Manager if
More info:
When my client used VT1 only, if VT1-1 failed/crashed, they did:
F HSM,SETSYS DUPLEX(BACKUP(N) MIGRATION(N))
F HSM,SETSYS DISASTERMODE(Y)
F HSM,TAPEREPL ALL DAVOLUMES
Then after fixing VT1-1, they did:
F HSM,SETSYS DUPLEX(BACKUP(Y) MIGRATION(Y))
Bill -
I converted our Super Session to TPX in 2007. There is no utility.
However, if you are not too heavy in the panels with SS it is not too bad.
So you know, I know no VTAM, I know not about communication software. And
yet, I was able to do this conversion.
If you need help, write me
Shai Hess writes:
MF must be open to take some good idea from PC to become
a better platform.
I agree, and the mainframe is open. For example, is a System z mainframe
running Novell or Red Hat Linux more or less open than a PC server
running Microsoft Windows 2008? I think the answer to that
No caching == poor performance. Frequent refresh == poor performance.
You can't win. The ideal would be an LLA that refreshed automatically
and incrementally whenever a STOW was performed on any of its catenands.
We're not there yet.
Our application library is called OPS.LIVE.LOADLIB
We have
In 200906051003.17401.usenet5...@yahoo.com, on 06/05/2009
at 10:03 AM, Gilbert Saint-Flour usenet5...@yahoo.com said:
I wrote a bunch of CLISTs until I started writing REXX execs in 1991, but
I wrote very few CLISTs since then. I wish a REXX exec could start with
PROC, like a CLIST can, so
In blu149-w64784daa05d8b280fc6913a1...@phx.gbl, on 06/09/2009
at 09:46 AM, Dave Salt ds...@hotmail.com said:
I tried your code, exactly as you have it, and it worked perfectly.
With or without a USERPROC member?
Or perhaps it's USERPROC itself that's giving you the cc 828?
USERPROC doesn't
In 55c15a713058df4dacc44c0f9b25da371d814e7...@nywexmbx2106.msad.ms.com,
on 06/04/2009
at 09:39 AM, Baraniecki, Ray ray.baranie...@morganstanley.com said:
because of the hyphen
Don't STR and NRSTR take care of that? Of course, that still leaves you
with the question of how to do the actual
In qhps25ts0l40ugj5jppc6pp5pqcrvq9...@4ax.com, on 06/09/2009
at 04:40 PM, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com said:
What does CONTROL CONLIST SYMLIST show?
SYSDSN returns the documented member not found, the ERROR block gets
control with a cc 828 and then EXEC performs the THEN leg
In listserv%200906090848549880.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 06/09/2009
at 08:48 AM, Martin Kline martin.kl...@yrcw.com said:
Works ok for me, replacing the execution of USERPROC with a WRITE
command.
Did a USERPROC member exist? If so, delete it and try again.
Sorry to ask the obvious, but 1) are
Scott,
Your reply made me smile. I am assuming the reference is to a line from
the Broadway play Oliver!, by the character named Fagin. Am I correct?
I saw that play on Broadway forty-five years ago. Unfortunately, it is
also the last play I have seen on Broadway. Good to know that GRS is
having
My bad. NOFREEZE is for LLA, not LINKLIST. That's what I get for answering from
home where I don't have the books.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
Thank you Bob.
[snip -- this thread was getting too long for my little mind]
I agree, but as long as progress is being made.
Just to keep others informed, I've made the changes to the code as
Info-Zip forum. This allowed me to compile the zip with
-DLARGE_FILE_SUPPORT with no errors.
I was in a shop once where the lla,refresh was run automatically every 5
minutes.
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
kenneth.kl...@kyfb.com
502-495-5000 x7011
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday,
I have been in shops where there is a standard user loadlib chain
managed by LLA (separate from the system linklist).
Linklist was specified in IEASYS00 as PROG=(00,UU).
In my case, the list was standard and an F LLA,UPDATE=UU was issued by
automation every 15 minutes to allow for program
Per IOCDS.
Many of our addresses are open systems dasd (for FDR backup purposes).
Dave
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:53:32 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
kees.vern...@klm.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity: 65535 devices per what? IOCDS, storage device?
Makes me feel working in a small shop...
Hi, All,
Anyone know of a SuperC-like utility that will parse out a complete EXEC
CICS command?
The immediate need is to list out all EXEC CICS QUERY SECURITY commands
in our production source library (all COBOL, so they'd all end with the
string END-EXEC). It would also be nice if the output
snip
My attempts to use SDSF under JES3 generate the 'user not authorized to
use SDSF' message.
unsnip
Sound more like the init exit isn't find a match in your various groups.
Did you try to take the qualifying restrictions, eg TSOAUTH? I've found
that this NTBL grouping. Unless SDSF has
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:26:36 -0600, Frank Swarbrick
frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com wrote:
I am such an applications person. Only I don't count that as a flaw.
Tools are (should be) there to make life easier. Such a useful tool would
be a system level JOBLIB that would be searched by default if
My attempts to use SDSF under JES3 generate the 'user not authorized to use
SDSF' message
You probably haven't done the RACF definitions that are required for JES3
support.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN
This question is more about the tapes we created years ago before we went
to an SMS enviornment and how do sites clean-up tapes that sit for
several years that for the most part were from application sets that we no
longer run.
A second type would be for retired applications, do you keep all
One thing to consider is that an INCLUDED JCL member can contain INCLUDE
statements, so you if the concern is that the testers want to concatenate
libraries ahead of the productions, you could do the following:
// SET LVL=PROD
// INCLUDE JLSTART
// INCLUDE LVL.JOBL
In member JLSTART you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Multi-line Srchfor Utility?
Hi, All,
Anyone know of a SuperC-like utility that will parse out a
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:58:59 +0900, Timothy Sipples e99...@jp.ibm.com wrote:
Also probably getting off topic, but is there anything particularly wrong
with CL/SUPERSESSION? IBM still supports it, and there is no end of service
planned.
If for some reason there is something wrong with
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
One thing to consider is that an INCLUDED JCL member can contain INCLUDE
statements, so you if the concern is that the testers want to concatenate
libraries ahead of the productions, you could do the following:
// SET LVL=PROD
// INCLUDE JLSTART
// INCLUDE LVL.JOBL
In
Since SuperSession is so great (and it is much better than TPX and from
what I remember of Session Manager), how come it is so hard to
find a session entry. When you have a menu with a hundred of more
sessions, a simple 'FIND sessid' would be most helpful instead of
having
to scroll down thru
On 6/10/2009 at 4:49 PM, in message
1244674171.4a30387b2d...@webmail.ukonline.net, Dougie Lawson
dougie.law...@ukonline.co.uk wrote:
Quoting Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com:
Such a useful tool
would be a system level JOBLIB that would be searched by default if
a module can
USERPROC existed and executed as expected. I then changed the library names so
they didn't exist, and USERPROC didn't execute.
HTH,
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/SIM/simplist.htm
Date: Wed, 10
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:03:07 -0500, McKown, John jmck...@healthmarkets.com
wrote:
My bad. NOFREEZE is for LLA, not LINKLIST. That's what I get for answering
from home where I don't have the books.
Yes - and LNKLST is frozen by default. But you can change the default:
CSVLLAxx:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:12:02 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Anyone know of a SuperC-like utility that will parse out a
complete EXEC
CICS command?
The immediate need is to list out all EXEC CICS QUERY
SECURITY
I was in a shop once where the lla,refresh was run automatically every 5
minutes.
What was the purpose of that?
Even application changes don't happen that frequently.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
In my case, the list was standard and an F LLA,UPDATE=UU was issued by
automation every 15 minutes to allow for program migrations throughout the day.
That seems excessive.
We managed it through our standard application change control process.
We rarely did it daily.
Only production was in the
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:20:10 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
// SET LVL=PROD
// INCLUDE JLSTART
// INCLUDE LVL.JOBL
In member JLSTART you would have
//JOBLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.EMPTY.LOADLIB
Sigh. The ugly boundary condition problem. Is SYS1.EMPTY.LOADLIB
Reading up on DFSMSHSM I see that it can backup Linux packs. Can it
backup z/VM packs ?. I currently use ADRSSU to backup our z/VM volumes
and wanted to know if we could HSM instead.
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer
Macro 4 Limited
Direct Line: +44 (0)1293 872121, Switchboard: +44 (0)1293
It's a good case for a rexx program. Just let me know what you want
parsed out and give some samples of input to look at.
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
kenneth.kl...@kyfb.com
502-495-5000 x7011
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:21:01 -0400, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov
wrote:
Since SuperSession is so great (and it is much better than TPX and from
what I remember of Session Manager), how come it is so hard to
find a session entry. When you have a menu with a hundred of more
sessions, a
On 10 Jun 2009 22:59:45 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I believe those DMS/CICS publications are still orderable from IBM. You can
order them online here:
http://www.ibm.com/shop/publications/order
For example, publication SH20-0001-01 has a U.S. dollar price of only
$15.81.
By the
I know that you can jump from session to session with triggers and issue
a START sess command from the command line,
but many times session entries have to be changed or viewed and the only
way to do that is to locate the entry itself thru scrolling or
paging - this is a real pain when there are
Wikipedia gives credit to an episode of Seinfeld titled 'The Soup Nazi':
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Soup_Nazi
I thought I heard the line in a Saturday Night Live skit, but I could not find
any references.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Eileen,
Modify the applicable session with the M command to change the
following to move commonly used sessions to the top of your display:
(APL) Display group 850 (-)
(USR) Display order 99(-)
Every shop I've worked at has allowed me to
you have to find the session to modify first and most are not commonly
used.
I originally tried to organize sessions according to most commonly used,
etc, but very often
new sessions had to be added in a hurry so they fell in where ever they
were assigned on the menu.
Besides, I do not even know
Hal,
After receiving some offline replies, I am convinced Scott is referring
to The Soup Nazi line. While I like my version that ties Fagin with
the line, I am not even sure that Ron Moody actually uttered that
phrase. Old memories sometimes morph over time! grin.
Bob
-Original
The only vendor I have ever had that took real exception to reverse
engineering their code was one that had a security exposure
(unrestricted SPFCOPY SVC). They made all kinds of threats. In the end,
they fixed there code.
Dennis Roach
GHG Corporation
Lockheed Martin Mission Services
Flight
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
snip---
-unsnip--
Frank, I understand your frustration, but there are some
On Tue, 26 May 2009 10:36:41 -0700, Tom Ross
tmr...@stlvm20.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
1) XMLPARSE(XMLSS) is not compatible with XMLSS(COMPAT), as described
in the
COBOL Migration GUide. They are 2 completely different parsers! The
changes
are minor, but must be looked at when migrating from
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:32:18 +0200, Tidy, David (D) dt...@dow.com
wrote:
Thanks for the earlier correction on my language - I am indeed English.
Explains why I couldn't reconcile the hex. I work for an American
company as well, so I should have been more aware.
Anyway
Doug Henry wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009 10:36:41 -0700, Tom Ross
tmr...@stlvm20.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
1) XMLPARSE(XMLSS) is not compatible with XMLSS(COMPAT), as described
in the
COBOL Migration GUide. They are 2 completely different parsers! The
changes
are minor, but must be looked at when
Hal,
After receiving some offline replies, I am convinced Scott is referring
to The Soup Nazi line. While I like my version that ties Fagin with
the line, I am not even sure that Ron Moody actually uttered that
phrase. Old memories sometimes morph over time! grin.
Bob
Hi Bob. See
--snip---
I am 55 years old. my main background is MF (if you are old, you are
MF), but I can change my preferred background platform with a new
platform (I am divorce ;)) . But everyone know (maybe hard to admit)
that new
Good catch, Guy. I'd forgotten that one since in our shop, ANY
specification of volser is considered a violation of in-house standards.
And the Powers That Be are EXTREMELY touchy about it.
Guy Gardoit wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
On Thursday 11 June 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
Thank you Bob.
[ snip ]
So, I'd be interested in the code once you manage to get this
working. Comparing the difference between your CFLAGS mine, I see
mine : -D_OPEN_SYS -DMVS -DREENTRANT -DLARGE_FILE_SUPPORT
Yours :
-DOS390 -DEBCDIC
Sorry, Bob - it was the Soup Nazi...although I'm pretty sure that the
Oliver reference would have been, Mr. Bumble, not Fagin :)
Oliver: Please, sir, I want some ... more?
Mr. Bumble: More?!?!?
End of OT...
Scott Fagen (not Fagin)
Enterprise Systems Management
CA
snip-
I might as well just post the major (4-digit) model numbers here,
starting with z900 (the first 64-bit machine, introduced in late 2000)
and leading to System z10:
2064: z900
2066: z800
2084: z990
2086: z890
2094: z9 EC
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
My bad. NOFREEZE is for LLA, not LINKLIST. That's what I get for
answering from home where I don't
have the books.
???
All the IBM books you should ever need are right here:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Even more annoying, once it displays one, =X on the command line
doesn't take me back to TSO READY prompt; it just goes on to
recall the next data set.
I split the screen and cancelled myself from SDSF.
All you need do is press the ATTN key! :-D
--
Edward E Jaffe
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:05:11 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Even more annoying, once it displays one, =X on the command line
doesn't take me back to TSO READY prompt; it just goes on to
recall the next data set.
I split the screen and cancelled myself from SDSF.
All you
The PS2AFPD daemon is back. Per IBM's direction I issued a S
AOPSDTO,OPTIONS='-D XFD'. This is supposed to stop any active daemons. Next do
S AOPSTART and all stopped daemons should start. It took a bit until it showed
in SDSF but it did appear.
Alan
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:49:26 +0200
---snip
1. To place your library(s) in the LINKLIST, they must be cataloged in
the Master Catalog.
-snip--
Datasets that are not in the master catalog CAN be in the linklist. We have
several. You just have to add the volser to the PROG01 coding -
LNKLST ADD NAME(LNKLST00)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Klein, Kenneth
It's a good case for a rexx program. Just let me know what you want
parsed out and give some samples of input to look at.
For the immediate task, I just need to extract EXEC CICS QUERY SECURITY
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
All you need do is press the ATTN key! :-D
(Perhaps after pressing RESET).
RESET should never be required. ATTN is an expedited-flow SNA signal.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400
Any one know where to get the Xproc and Xwriter programs now? Thank you.
Regards,
Herman Stocker
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
This would be really easy to do in an edit macro. Here's the pseudo code (with
leading dots to preserve indentation):
address isredit
macro
exclude all
find 'exec cics' first
do while rc = 0
...label .zcsr = .a
...find 'end-exec' next
...find 'query security' .a .zcsr first
...if rc = 0 then
If the authorised TCB1 issues ATTACH EP=PGM2,RSAPF=YES is it solely the
case that PGM2 is allowed to come from a non-APF-authorised source ?
Further, is it the case that any loads/links issued by PGM2 must come from
APF-authorised sources (else S306-0C) ? The manual is vague as to quite
what
Right. I have not. But that was part of my question. Evidently the SDSF
manual is correct, and security package rules (RACF or equivalent) are
needed in order to use SDSF under JES3.
Thank you.
Paul
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Yes, just addvol them and make sure they are online to MVS. Make sure
HSM uses DSS as the mover.
Terry Traylor
charlesSCHWAB
TIS Mainframe Storage Management
Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg
(602) 977-5154
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Yes, just addvol them and make sure they are online to MVS.
Terry Traylor
charlesSCHWAB
TIS Mainframe Storage Management
Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg
(602) 977-5154
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Crispin Hugo
Sent:
Many thanks Terry
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/
Macro 4 plc, The Orangery, Turners Hill Road, Worth, Crawley, RH10 4SS
Direct Line: +44 (0)1293 872121 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1293 872000
Fax: +44 (0) 1293 872001
This message contains confidential information and is
Take a look at www.bluezone.comhttp://www.bluezone.com/.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
larry macioce
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: replacment for pcomm
That truly isn't
We use Bluezone and XTRA and they seem to work ok. I like Bluezone better
because it came with an SSL FTP client.
Jim Wangler
214-502-6445
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Amerigo Baldassarri
Sent: Thursday, June 11,
On Wednesday 10 June 2009, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Bob Woodside wrote:
I'll look at the configure script later to see what needs to be
done there. Then I'll do the same with unzip 6.0. And the code
should probably be patched to recognize a ZOS define as well as
OS390 -- time to move the
This reminds of y2k days. You can use SRCHFOR and create a output. Then run a
rexx or syncsort to identify necessary query on the second
iteration.
//SEARCH EXEC PGM=ISRSUPC,
//PARM=(SRCHCMP,
//'COBOL DPPLCMT
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 06/11/2009
03:53:31 PM:
If the authorised TCB1 issues ATTACH EP=PGM2,RSAPF=YES is it solely the
case that PGM2 is allowed to come from a non-APF-authorised source ?
Further, is it the case that any loads/links issued by PGM2 must
We are in need of a z/OS Senior Systems Programmer.
We are an ISV located in a Boston suburb. We currently have a z9-BC running
zOS 1.6, zOS 1.8, z OS 1.9 and zLinux LPARs. We will shortly be installing zOS
1.10.
If interested please contact off list for more information.
RE
I have no particular inside information on this point, but occasionally we
do have people with a sense of history. That's nice to see the 20xx echoes,
isn't it?
That said, there's only one whole 20xx number past 2098 (in decimal
arithmetic). It would appear that 20xx will become something else.
Clark Morris asks:
Did they improve the code generation capabilities in either
Visual Age Generator or Rational EGL so that the resulting
code could be compiled with the optimize options on?
I think I can answer for Rational EGL (Enterprise Generation Language), the
successor to VisualAge
In a message dated 6/11/2009 3:50:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
pgs4ibmm...@pacbell.net writes:
manual is correct, and security package rules (RACF or equivalent) are
needed in order to use SDSF under JES3.
In JES2 land ISFACR reads SDSF parms and makes RACF rules. Don't know
if it'll
84 matches
Mail list logo
