The equivalent Marine rank (E-3) is Lance Corporal. The Marines do use the
rank of Private First Class, but it is one grade lower, the equivalent of an
Army Private (E-2).
And, with a nod to Shmuel (Give me back my Air Force) , the Air Force
equivalent is A1C (Airman First Class), which may be
of the earlier x3270 maintainers).
Other old 3270 users just call it Shift-6 (but don't try that on your
PC keyboard).
Bob Woodside
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
On Thursday 16 December 2010 07:52, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In
77142d37c0c3c34da0d7b1da7d7ca3430880b...@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.c
om, on 12/15/2010
at 10:16 PM, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com said:
Perhaps Shmuel was punning?
I never pun[1]. That's my story and I'm sticking
On Monday 13 December 2010 19:01, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
If your response would have been tortuous when sent privately, why
would it be safe to post it publicly?
s/tortuous/tortious/
Cheers,
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Friday 05 November 2010 16:46, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In b351325f7e2c494a8783b83dbf3d5390145996d...@hdxmspa.us.lmco.com,
on 11/05/2010
at 09:46 AM, Roach, Dennis (N-GHG) dennis.ro...@lmco.com said:
Try the TSO EDIT command from ready some time.
I have.
Make you like vi.
On Saturday 09 October 2010 03:11, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
On 10/6/2010 11:06 AM, Bill Fairchild wrote:
When I was very young, sometimes during dinner my mom or dad
would use a word that I didn't understand. When I would ask
what it meant, my dad would invariably say You know how to
On Wednesday 11 August 2010 19:58, Rick Fochtman wrote:
snip---
---
This has been an interesting thread. It seems we all really
ENJOY auditors... Can someone say prostate exam?
Isn't that essentially a different kind of
On Monday 02 August 2010 20:30, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
Try as I might, I have been totally unsuccessful in breaking our
console Operators (whose familiarity with EXCP is limited to SDSF
displays) from the habit of erroneously referring to it as an
exception count. exec pee would be an
On Monday 26 July 2010 11:28, Peter Nuttall wrote:
My German might be a bit rusty, but isn't Burg - Castle and Berg -
Mountain ?
Ganz richtig.
Cheers,
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
On Monday 26 July 2010 10:17, Bill Fairchild wrote:
Bob,
You left out the other in syllable in Kaliningrad.
Finger check in the banana problem algorithm.
I probably should have just written Königsberg.
Cheers,
Bob
--
For
On Monday 26 July 2010 11:23, R.S. wrote:
Bill Fairchild pisze:
The Russian name, when transliterated into English, is Kaliningrad,
and the German name means King's Mountain.
Just to complement this off-topic thread:
OT, yes, but entertaining.
Kaliningrad can be
translated as City
On Monday 26 July 2010 14:25, Bill Fairchild wrote:
Then there are the FIFO, LIFO, WINO (Whenver In, Never Out), and other
queueing algorithms
Not to overlook FIST (First In, Still There), commonly used in the
Windows environment, I believe
Cheers,
Bob
, debating
the philological significance of the famous, um, bitch line running
from Kalingrad (or Królewiec, if you prefer) to Odessa. (And yes, my
hovercraft is full of eels.)
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
been in IBM or in an ISV with
strong UK ties. I used to hear see-eye-see-ess in Houston ages ago. But
as others have pointed out, the phenomenon seems to defy
regionalization within the US.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
On Friday 23 July 2010 00:17, Phil Smith III wrote:
Do not anger the LE, for its wrath is not pretty!
I think that's Do not meddle in the affairs of the LE, for it is subtle
and quick to anger.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
On Friday 23 July 2010 01:18, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Shouldn't that have been Start Subchannel???
This errant pedantry up with I shall not put!
s/errant/arrant/
But I think we could suspend this rule in the case of a knight
arrant. :-)
Cheers,
Bob
On Monday 21 June 2010, McKown, John wrote:
Long term data should be enscribed on granite and stored in the
Egyptian desert. This is proven technology!
My goodness, is it Friday already?
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
dispatch the code to the System z Integrated
Information Processor, or zIIP.
I can't find the phrase System Resource Block in that article...
The article appears to have been redacted sometime in the past week. (Do
the folks at The Register follow this mailing list?)
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway
as Unix under the Advanced tab to
access you Unix filesystem.
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
or
VirtualBox. I've never tried it, though.
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message
in a platform.)
but our management has decreed that all future development will be
Solaris/SPARC or Linux/Intel.
Why no Solaris/Intel option?
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM
from someone within IBM; but if true it bodes
no good for anyone.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
-Press-the-F1-Key-In-XP
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
that they own.
/quote
But please don't do it! :-)
(Same goes for the Solaris boot parm that has the same effect.)
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
the default
behavior. [Have not yet tested this]
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
to India or hit the
road, and how many z/OS development and support personnel are rank
newbies/amateurs. But this really concerns me about the future of z/OS.
I'd really like it if someone could allay my fears, but I'm not too
hopeful.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc
On Monday 03 August 2009, P S wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Bill Fairchildbi...@mainstar.com
wrote:
Not trying to be pendantic, but I think the word is pedant. :-)
True, but pe(n)dants are used to being hung...
[ groan! ]
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http
On Thursday 30 July 2009, W. Kevin Kelley wrote:
I think we supported 3370 but not 3375 (which I think was the FBA
device).
The 3370 was the FBA device. I remember working on access method
support for the 3310 3370 back in the early 1980's.
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc
of computers, I have to reiterate David Alcock's dictum:
Languages evolve. Thou shalt evolve too.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Monday 27 July 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
On Friday 24 July 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
Does the cmsmvs version fail like this if you execute it under
z/Unix?
Tried that and it does not fail with an error :
Or does it just fail when you run it via the MVS JCL
On Friday 24 July 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
On Friday 24 July 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
I don't see how zip can be failing now. Everything seems to be
defined correctly.
This is an odd one.
Has anyone else verified the zip patches (cmsmvs version) applied
results in the same message
On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
Try this. Edit the file zip.c.
[snip]
Thanks for your assistance, done the above I get the following :
[snip]
Zip special compilation options:
* size of int: 4
* size
FileZilla on either Unix or Windoze
workstations.)
System performance shouldn't take too big a hit from this.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
* size of long long: 8
* size of off_t: 8
__LF is defined.
off_t must be defined as a long long
If you see anything else, we have a real problem.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
On the topic of bzip2 (as alternative to UNZIP MVS/cmsmvs version):
==
On Friday 17 July 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
Vikesh --
Would a version of bzip2 help you out for the time
with RC=14 and the above
mentioned error). Not sure where/how to specify more.
Whew! Sorry, I can't help you on this one. I'm barely able to
scrounge up enough resources to test a 4GB file. I can't even come
close to a 46GB file.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http
like either the patch is defective, or there's some other
maintenance in the directory that clashes with it. I'll let you know as
soon as I find out what's going on here.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
zipfile.c
my...@myhost:/tmp$
No prompts and no rejects.
Then, of course, the whole source tree needs to be uploaded to the
mainframe and rebuilt.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
I don't understand why there would be a boundary condition at
7GB. 4GB, yes, but not 7GB. Have you tried zipping a file that is
just a little larger than 4 GB?
Sorry about that - Yes, you
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
and extracted zip31-try04.zip...
s/zip31-try04.zip/zip31-try04.diff/g
...but you knew that. :-)
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
On Friday 17 July 2009, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob Woodside
[ snip ]
The old version of bzip2 that used to be available from IBM has
been withdrawn; I don't know what version it was or whether it
supported
This link appears borken. :-(
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
imaginw wanting such
a beast, but that's the subject of a different thread!
I suggest this because I've no idea when I'll be able to fix the
unzip patch.
By the way, if you haven't done so, would you please post your
problem to the Info-ZIP form as well?
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
lame sort of url.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM
as I know, Zip64 support is only available in the latest Sun
beta of JDK7. Is my info not up to date?
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
On Friday 17 July 2009, Steve Comstock wrote:
Eric Chevalier wrote:
On 17 Jul 2009 06:30:15 -0700,
ibm...@woodsway.com (Bob Woodside) wrote:
For reference,
http://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/%27HTTPD2.PT217.HTML(INDEX)%27
This link appears borken. :-(
borken?
borken : adj
, etc.
I've never tried running unzip with MVS JCL (till today), and I
haven't looked into the code too carefully. So I don't really know how
it handles output file allocation under MVS - or whether unzip 6.0 is
compatible yet with the dots code in the zip 3.1b beta.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Find the computer error
Account number may have been used instead of the amount.
Cheers,
Bob Woodside
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
there will be no need for handling of filename
through stdin issue on the uss version either as the mvs version
works great!
I will do the same for unzip tomorrow and let you know.
I'm looking forward to hearing your results.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http
. :-)
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
is in the same state of neglect (about 10 years' worth) as
the z/OS-MVS code was.
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
On Monday 29 June 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
On Friday 26 June 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
By the way, Vikesh, did you have to apply the patches against
zip 3.1b that Lutz posted to the Info-ZIP forum to get the dots
stuff to work?
Yes, I did. Lutz's solution works 100% to get the dots
On Saturday 27 June 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
On Friday 26 June 2009, Kirk Wolf wrote:
Not only possible, but already available!
See the sample program com.ibm.jzos.sample.ZipDatasets in the
JZOS Sample programs download, which is available here:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver
!)
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
in about 10 minutes. There's clearly a lot more work to be done
here.
Yes, I do have a batch JCL for the cmsmvs zip set up :
Thanks for the JCL. I'll keep you posted.
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
On Friday 26 June 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
Yes, I do have a batch JCL for the cmsmvs zip set up :
//INFOZIP EXEC PGM=ZIP,
// PARM='/-avl -1 -MV=dots DD:OUT ''INPUT.DATASET.NAME'''
By the way, Vikesh, did you have to apply the patches against zip
3.1b that Lutz posted to the Info-ZIP
On Wednesday 24 June 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
I think I have the cmsmvs version of zip pretty well done as of
last night, but I need to do some more testing, etc.
Nope, not quite ready. When I tried to add a large file to an
archive, I got this error message:
zip error: Entry too
natively on z/OS USS. (When I can edit my source files directly on
z/OS with Nedit, I'll be a happy camper!)
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
and corrupted - with no
problems; Lutz reported that it worked fine for him, too.
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
http://www.zjournal.com/index.cfm?section=articleaid=1075
Thanks for this link, a solution we may consider.
Regards,
Vikesh
Please
. But sadly, like so many of these tools, the version is very
old - before tabs were introduced. And I haven't gotten around to
trying it.
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
On Wednesday 24 June 2009, Shane wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 15:11 -0400, Bob Woodside wrote:
(When I can edit my source files directly on
z/OS with Nedit, I'll be a happy camper!)
I thought Nedit had quietly died a few years back. Nice editor.
It's still alive on my machines
On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Andy Robertson wrote:
We use this, Barbera
Might help
I hope email code page problems don't trash the special characters
I'm using . . .
Looks clean except for all those pound sterling symbols, which need
to be changed to dollar signs.
Cheers,
Bob
- adding, updating, deleting -
under z/OS USS, it should be OK.
Once that's done, I'll start looking at the cmsmvs side again. (My
feeble brain was getting too confused trying to keep both sorted out at
the same time.)
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http
On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
Ah, but that I was just playing around with the code to see what
would happen. Based on EG's comments, I've modified the function
local_to_display_string in fileio.c to play nicer with EBCDIC - at
least it seems nicer to me. That's the function
On Monday 22 June 2009, Bonno, Tuco wrote:
// this is an example of why I like straphanging all these various
listerservers --- I'm always getting to learn new tricks and cool
stuff
Ditto. :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Monday 22 June 2009, Howard Brazee wrote:
On 21 Jun 2009 15:05:18 -0700, eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
Maybe not yet, but there is a bill in front of Federal parliament
that, if passed, won't even require a warrant to get the
information to CSIS).
We'll be as safe and secure
. :-)
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
--Original Message--
From: esst...@juno.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Sent: Jun 20
usable for this limited purpose.
I haven't tried doing this with a large file - I don't have the
large file stuff stable yet -- and that was the whole purpose of this
exercise.
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
, you have to escape the
parentheses, too, like this:
//\'userid.BIG.PDS\(MEMBER\)\'
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
Thanks, I tried that, still get :
/u/userid/zip31b: zip -av -1 /tmp/BIG_FILE.zip //'userid.BIG.FILE
On Thursday 18 June 2009, Bonno, Tuco wrote:
or, get into omvs itself ( at ispf6, do a tso omvs command ) and
then issue the df command --
Or just oshell df.
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
unzip -p backup | tar xf -
It's sort of using zip in place of gzip or bzip2.
It's a little strange, but it actually works.
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Bob Woodsideibm
about it. Maybe this
weekend I can refresh my memory of what I did and send you a proper
diff.
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
Thanks for all assistance thus far,
Vikesh
Please Note: This email and its contents
On Monday 15 June 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
Bob, thanks for the gmake link and the update - it sounds promising.
I've just downloaded gmake and going to install it.
Just want to confirm if gmake is required for the cmsmvs/mvs.mki ?
I don't know if it is required for you.
Our make
:
zip also accepts a single dash (-) as the name of a file
to be compressed, in which case it will read the file from
standard input, allowing zip to take input from another program.
For example:
tar cf - . | zip backup -
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway
Vikesh --
Like I said, keep following the discussions on the Info-ZIP forums.
I've managed to piece together clues from you, Lutz, and sms, and got a
clean build from the cmsmvs/mvs.mki makefile that looks like it
actually works.
I just posted some initial info on the Info-ZIP
On Friday 12 June 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
What I have working is the version in the unix directory, built
under USS as a Unix executable.
Thanks Bob, it is disappointing, but at least that explains the
differences I was seeing.
We don't have gmake installed, and so with make -f
On Thursday 11 June 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
Thank you Bob.
[ snip ]
So, I'd be interested in the code once you manage to get this
working. Comparing the difference between your CFLAGS mine, I see
mine : -D_OPEN_SYS -DMVS -DREENTRANT -DLARGE_FILE_SUPPORT
Yours :
-DOS390 -DEBCDIC
On Wednesday 10 June 2009, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Bob Woodside wrote:
I'll look at the configure script later to see what needs to be
done there. Then I'll do the same with unzip 6.0. And the code
should probably be patched to recognize a ZOS define as well as
OS390 -- time to move
target
that that section hasn't been updated in about a decade. It doesn't use
the flags file created by configure. But flags isn't right either -
configure doesn't set -DOS390 or -DEBCDIC, so some work is needed
there.
Later
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc
progress. And when I have all the
changes, I'll post a diff to the developers' forum.
Cheers,
Bob
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
rwoodsi...@woodsway.com
http://www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
On Tuesday 09 June 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
Thanks for the links.
While waiting for our order on bzip2,
I tried downloading INFO-Zip
3.1b (Beta version) - as Zip 3.0 does not compile. I finally managed
to compile INFO-ZIP Zip 3.1b to create a ZIP module.
[snip]
How do I
- - - -
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
www.woodsway.com
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
kenneth.kl...@kyfb.com
502-495-5000 x7011
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Michel Castelein
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 6
On Friday 05 June 2009, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Klein, Kenneth
!*''# waka waka bang splat tick tick hash
^...@`$$- carat at back-tick dollar dollar dash
*!'$_ splat bang
), but there
don't seem to be in recent years.
Cheers,
Bob
- - - -
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
On Friday 22 May 2009, Jim McAlpine wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Jim McAlpine
jim.mcalp...@gmail.comwrote:
Walter, many thanks. We will certainly give this a try.
Jim McAlpine
OK, we've implemented that bit of code and got to the point of
executing IKJEFTSR to issue a LISTDS
haven't really used COBOL in [mumblemumble] years, so I
haven't kept up with the newer features. Sounds slick.)
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
www.woodsway.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Jim McAlpine wrote:
Thanks for all the replies and suggestions. Having spoken again to
the developer who originally asked the question, it seems it is a
tad more complicated in that he actually wants to do i/o against the
file from the REXX program. The question
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Jim McAlpine wrote:
We have a REXX program which is called from COBOL in batch in which
we need to check for the existence of a file. Obviously there is no
TSO environment here so no commands like LISTDS. Is there anyway to
acheive this without the TSO environment.
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
Would it be feasible for you to invoke IKJEFT01 instead of
the Rexx interpreter...
On the other hand
Forget my earlier lame suggestion. As a couple of other people
have already pointed out, calling BPXWDYN is the way
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Doesn't IKJEFT01 require that it be invoked only from an
APF authorized program, which might be an obstacle to the
OP?
Actually, I believe I spoke before thinking earlier. I think the
program would need to call IKJTSOEV and IKJEFTSR,
On Monday 18 May 2009, Rob Scott wrote:
SYS1.MODGEN(IRACCT)
Thanks -- that's exactly what I was looking for; even though,
as Mark pointed out a few minutes later, it's not officially considered
GUPI.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
www.woodsway.com
On Monday 18 May 2009, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 08:43:56 -0400, Bob Woodside ibm...@woodsway.com
wrote:
Can anyone tell me where the SRM CPU Management Control
Table (CCT) layout is documented?
[ snip ]
I don't really want to include examples that I
Can anyone tell me where the SRM CPU Management Control Table
(CCT) layout is documented?
In my copy of MVS Data Areas, I hit a dead end at the RMCT,
which contains the RMCTCCT field pointing to the CCT. I can't find a
layout for the CCT itself.
I want to include, in a
On Monday 18 May 2009, Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:
On Monday 18 May 2009 13:48, Mark Jacobs wrote:
On the main page is a picture of a penguin with some rude words
attached.
Most of the things I see on http://www.share.org/ have a .aspx
suffix, which, if I'm not mistaken, tells us they use a
96 matches
Mail list logo
