The S in FS is the same "standard" as the S in FBS.
With an F which has been MODded there will, mostly, be an unfilled track (last
record on from the previous output, empty remainder of track unless the record
happens to be the last one which would fit on a track).
FS guarantees (by the person
From the trivia-I-happen-to-know drawer. Classic CA-1 (at least used to) use an
unblocked RECFM=F data base so that records could be managed in the same way.
So tape volser 123456 would be the 123,456th record in the data base. Made for
a gigantic data base, but processing was very quick
I don't think 'FS' is meaningful. Not wrong, just pointless. If unblocked, all
blocks contain exactly one record.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
What does RECFM=FS mean?
How does it differ from RECFM=F?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 20:12, Bill Woodger wrote:
>
> Yet in modern times the S for F has its uses. If a C/C++ program is going to
> use a "seek" for a file, if the file is F/FB, then the
Yet in modern times the S for F has its uses. If a C/C++ program is going to
use a "seek" for a file, if the file is F/FB, then the file will be read from
the start to satisfy the seek (because there may be those embedded short
blocks), but if the file is FS/FBS (guarantee, by the person who
On 5 January 2017 at 12:38, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> 2) $BR1 in M gives me "lots" of good information .
> The doc says "JES2 initialization processing encountered an error examining
> the BERT maps" and the resolution is "
> Use the indicative dump and the SVC dump (if
Pretty much I would say. Just want to point out that FBS and VBS are worlds
apart. As discussed, the 'S' in VBS is 'spanned'. The 'S' in FBS means
'standard' or some such. This guarantees that the file has no short blocks
other than the very last one. A file written 'normally' is usually FBS
Paul,
For QSAM, there's F/FS/FB/FBS, U, V/VB, VS/VBS that you may see used in a
business system (and business systems, in the main, are the reasons for having
a Mainframe).
All have their specific "it's better in this case to do this". Of these, VS/VBS
is the slowest way to read or write
A sysmod can have more than one ++VER.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 4:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IPLing z/OS 2.2 from 1.13 for first time
On 2017-01-05, at 14:47, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>
> If a JES2 output segment is created with 'VS' attributes, that does not mean
> that the data on spool actually consists of spanned records. The point of
> spanning is to manage records that can exceed physical block size, e.g.
> 32760. SMF
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247419.html
SDSF REXX Redbook
Providing REXX programs with an API to access IBM z/OS System Display and
Search Facility (SDSF) functions gives you a powerful tool for accessing and
controlling JES resources. Although we chose REXX as the language
We’re drifting a bit here, but I had to look up ++VER to see whether a single
PTF could be installed on more than base FMID. I find
'-FMID--(--sysmod_id--)-'
I have never made peace with railroad track diagrams, but I think this means
that only one base FMID can be specified. I don't see
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247419.html
SDSF REXX Redbook
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 1:50 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
OK, I overstated my case. Did not think about SORT. Certainly ISPF cannot
handle VBS.
I've long operated on the ROT that you can't do much with SMF data until
'something' converts it to VB, so I have not actually tried standards like
IEBGENER or IDCAMS in many a moon. I am curious though as
Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>Most standard utilities fail when opened to V(B)S records.
Please name them. Just so I can shock my amazed users when they complain about
reading VBS things...
>Only IFASMFDP can read SMF data, and the output from that is ordinary VB.
Really? What about DFSORT and
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:50:25 -0500, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>for my own sake I checked some sysout of my own and if you scroll over to the
>right in the jes2 dataset view from ? you see jes2 dataset attributes, I see
>RECFM V and U and VA and UA, no VS for any jes2 datasets
>
Ah, but did you
> It would seem to me, that for the accuracy keyword to work, that STP
> must be using external time sources directly? Or is ACCURACY only
> really reporting on clock steering events > 50 milliseconds(in your
case)?
ACCURACY is looking at the steering information and issuing IEA032E if the
for my own sake I checked some sysout of my own and if you scroll over to the
right in the jes2 dataset view from ? you see jes2 dataset attributes, I see
RECFM V and U and VA and UA, no VS for any jes2 datasets
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse 1 Robinson"
Like Walt, I'm skeptical of the assertion that a spool data set is VS, where
'S' means 'spanned'. Spanned records are extremely rare in MVS. The only use
for them I've ever come across is MANx SMF, which I believe predates dirt. Most
standard utilities fail when opened to V(B)S records. Only
All,
My intent was clarification for my old age. I went back and looked and I am
good.
Thanks all..
Scott
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM scott Ford wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Thx for you comment. I agree otherwise there is confusion.
>
>
> Scott
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:55 AM
Tom,
Thx for you comment. I agree otherwise there is confusion.
Scott
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:55 AM Tom Marchant <
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:24:12 -0600, Bill Woodger wrote:
>
>
>
> >No. Your CALLs are static.
>
> >
>
>
>
> Bill,
>
>
>
>
I have not seen anyone mention LPAR time offset. It's been around for
years--around Y2K IIRC--but we've never had a need to use it. In the LPAR Image
profile, you have this option:
Clock Type Assignment
Standard time of day
Logical partition time offset
If you select Standard, the LPAR
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:26:51 -0600, Art Gutowski wrote:
>... it probably wouldn't hurt to do a REPORT SYSMODS <1.13 zone>
>COMPAREDTO(<2.2 zone>) and vice versa.
Is that going to give you any useful information, Art? I believe that it is
possible to code the ++VER in a PTF so that the same PTF
Hi Allan,
Thanks for your response. Here's where I am in regards to them.
1) I need to double check compatibility maintenance. The only initialization
parameters listed in the migration guide as needing changes are optional
(removing BROADCAST from OUTDEF and JCLERR from JOBDEF) and I did
From "Pommier, Rex" on Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:17:01 +:
>Thanks for the suggestion. We are already running MODE=DUPLEX.
We had one or two systems where we had to make this change, and a couple that
we had to migrate to z11 checkpoint format. Other than that, no issues
Hi Ravi,
Thanks for the suggestion. We are already running MODE=DUPLEX.
CKPTDEF CKPT1=(DSNAME=SYS1.HASPCKPA,
VOLSER=Z1PG02,
INUSE=YES),
CKPT2=(DSNAME=SYS1.HASPCKPB,
VOLSER=Z1PG03,
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:02:23 +, Bill Bishop (TMNA) wrote:
>I have been requested to investigate the impact of switching "local" time to
>"UTC" time.
>
>We currently use STP to establish the time and offsets for our LPARs, so
>basically we are using UTC time correctly.
>
>However, the
Local time is just that, local - which means the time must adhere to the LOCAL
requirement. UTC is the world wide standard time, it will not change for
daylight savings.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: "Bill Bishop (TMNA)"
What is your CLOCK00 entries in SYS1.PARMLIB like?
I think if you code:
STPZONE NO
&
TIMEZONE W 00.00.00
You would be running UTC and not be affected by DST & Time Zones
Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
UFIT
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Hi Elardus,
What do you see if you issue $D ACTIVATE during that
disastrous IPL?
I couldn't do a $D ACTIVATE because JES was down. Once it came up cold, it
shows that I'm in Z22 mode.
This is documented and WAD, but very very disruptive!
Yup, and not something I want to do. There is
I have been requested to investigate the impact of switching "local" time to
"UTC" time.
We currently use STP to establish the time and offsets for our LPARs, so
basically we are using UTC time correctly.
However, the requirement may include not changing local time when daylight
savings time
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:13:48 +0700, Robin Atwood wrote:
>The JCL is not relevant, both applications are servers that use dynamic
>allocation. They are using SAPI to read the JES spool. The >message is
>
>IEC141I 013-A8,IGG0199G,TAURISP3,TAURISP3,SYS2
>
>The spool data set
Is this homegrown or vendor product like Mobius, VPS or other like product?
There is no obvious reason, short of reading a dump, to know what one job works
and one job does not.
If vendor product, then I would contact the vendor.
Otherwise I would contact IBM - probably JES2
Lizette
>
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 08:01:15 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>Why not
>https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieae200/remenq.htm
>?
IMO, this is better:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.idas300/rname.htm
--
Tom Marchant
The JCL is not relevant, both applications are servers that use dynamic
allocation. They are using SAPI to read the JES spool. The message is
IEC141I 013-A8,IGG0199G,TAURISP3,TAURISP3,SYS2
The spool data set is allocated to SYS2. I am really interested in advice
about reading VS data
These all were old/uncatalog's datasets left on the pack which were used with
z/OS1.13 as sysres(way back we moved to 2.1 and now over to 2.2) so as had same
name dsn got enqueue with LLA/XCFAS , now as some of you responded being simple
was to get the init done however due to storage
Why not
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieae200/remenq.htm
?
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Ravi Gaur wrote:
> These all were old/uncatalog's datasets left on the pack which were used
> with z/OS1.13 as sysres(way back we
Also not to miss if you have MODE=DUAL have it changed to MODE=DUPLEX
...There's an APAR regarding it with zOS2.2
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
I am writing code that is called by the end-user in SRB mode, and the code
will issue a PC. The caller may very well have its own FRR.
I would like to have the API have an FRR as well as the PC routine. Is there
some programable way I can determine how many are free (if only 1, I would
prefer to
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 05:37:08 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
> If these are Linklst'd datasets, then you could
> 1) Build a new LINKLST and remove these datasets in the new LINKLST
> 2) Do what you need to with these files (move, delete)
A new LNKLST set without the data sets is not sufficient.
Peter Relson wrote:
>>The manual states "The system only guarantees that installations can add
>>two FRRs"
>>Is that still true for zOS 2?
>Yes it is still true.
Thanks! I have searced around, but in what book is that written?
> That is not a statement about how much room there is for FRRs
I believe z/OS 2.2 fits within the N-2 compat/fallback range so:
1) verify all compat/fallback maint is installed on the 1.13 system. Check for
incompatable initialization parameters in the 2.2 JESPARMS.
2) look up $BR1 in JES messages/codes to see if any insight can be gained there
3)Contact
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 03:39:39 -0600, Ravi Gaur wrote:
>Delete datasets from Disk/3390 which are having enqueue from LLA/XCFAS
It would help if we know what data sets. If they are things like SYS1.LINKLIB
on an alternate IPL volume there are acceptable ways to do it including the
BYPASSNQ program
The manual states
"The system only guarantees that installations can add two FRRs"
Is that still true for zOS 2?
Yes it is still true. That is not a statement about how much room there is
for FRRs overall in the FRR stack (which, as it has long been, is 16
entries worth).
Peter Relson
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:24:12 -0600, Bill Woodger wrote:
>No. Your CALLs are static.
>
Bill,
It would be helpful if you would quote enough of the message that you
are replying to to provide context to what your "No" references.
--
Tom Marchant
Robin,
Please delete any part of the email you did a REPLY to that does not pertain to
your question. It tends to confuse the issue.
Next, I am not clear on Reading a VS on JES2 Spool. JES2 Spool has its own
unique process for creating SYSOUT. So if you could explain further that could
If these are Linklst'd datasets, then you could
1) Build a new LINKLST and remove these datasets in the new LINKLST
2) Do what you need to with these files (move, delete)
3) then if you need them back, build a new copy of the linklst
Everything will depend on what these datasets are and
One of our apps abends if trying to read a VS data set on the JES2 spool. The
message manual tells me this is
because it is not allowed to read VS SYSOUT using QSAM. Yet we have another
application which does exactly that.
Furthermore, after one day of staring at the code I cannot see any
Glenn,
Now I don't know your exact setup but this is what I have seen. I don't use
the accuracy parameter. I don't see why the STP needs to be using an external
time source directly to be accurate. NTP is a nifty protocol that takes
latency into account right back to the root of the chain
Lucas Rosalen wrote:
>You could do the right way, which means removing these datasets from LLA and
>LNKLST.
Agreed!
>Or you could recklessly use BYPASSNQ program, which can be found in CBT file
>#749
Hehehe, 'recklessly'? That AC(1) program is a frontend to screen SVCs and then
misuse
You could do the right way, which means removing these datasets from LLA
and LNKLST.
Or you could recklessly use BYPASSNQ program, which can be found in CBT
file #749
---
Ravi Gaur wrote:
>Delete datasets from Disk/3390 which are having enqueue from LLA/XCFAS
>Tried IDCAMS NVR and also ISPF 3.2 (with VOLUME serial no.) get in use
>message any trick to get the datasets deleted via bypassing enqueue? on this
>specific volume
Are those datasets cataloged with
Delete datasets from Disk/3390 which are having enqueue from LLA/XCFAS
Tried IDCAMS NVR and also ISPF 3.2 (with VOLUME serial no.) get in use
message any trick to get the datasets deleted via bypassing enqueue? on this
specific volume
53 matches
Mail list logo