(Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 10:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls [SEC=UNOFFICIAL
[Default] On 7 Jun 2019 09:26:29 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
>How many vulnerabilities have you seen that did not come down to people? Those
>sysprogs are just the tip of the iceberg as far as configuration, enforcement,
>management, policy, procedure,
W dniu 2019-06-12 o 18:29, Wayne Driscoll pisze:
I was one of the developers for Deadbolt, and while we were able to get the product into
a small number of installations as an "alpha" state release, the project was
cancelled in early 2008.
... and I remember your name from that time ;-)
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
I have never found much barrier to entry with the IBM Business Partner process.
The HUGE obstacle i
There were other ESMs.
I'm aware of at least two.
One was Deadbolt from JMenterprises (or so). One of Deadbolt developers
is member of IBM-MAIN (maybe more, I know one).
The second product was PIES. It was polish product. I don't think it was
in use outside of Poland.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
ame/trends/ztalk/barry-schrager/
http://www.dignus.com/success_stories/JME/paper.html
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 9:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Ju
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:26 AM Bob Bridges wrote:
> If that's what it stands for I should think those aren't just the big
> three but the ~only~ three. At least, I've never heard of any others.
> Which is odd, when you think about it; surely there's someone out there
> wanting to break into
If that's what it stands for I should think those aren't just the big three but
the ~only~ three. At least, I've never heard of any others. Which is odd,
when you think about it; surely there's someone out there wanting to break into
the market? So says my capitalist assumptions. But
List on behalf of
ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 4:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Seymour, i have seen sysprogs in few sites that are convinced that you need
read access to racf / tss db in order
And this is telling.
What did you propose? New product to make the system less vulnerable or
just suggest proper configuration?
What's the solution for the case?
Why almost all cases mentioned here are like that, that means some
misconfiguration done by mistake or due to lack of knowledge?
Why
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Unfortunately I have seen few. However I fixed it (that was part of my role
there).
And again it is not about paltform strength, it is about people. However this
is the market for some companies.
--
Radoslaw
ussion List on behalf
> of Jones, Phil <02379a6d81f2-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 9:29 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
> [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
>
> At the risk of being con
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jones, Phil <02379a6d81f2-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 9:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
At the risk of being controvers
Unfortunately I have seen few. However I fixed it (that was part of my
role there).
And again it is not about paltform strength, it is about people. However
this is the market for some companies.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2019-06-06 o 03:33, Bill Johnson pisze:
Agree 100%
So what?
SVC is one of system components.
Byte is set of bits.
A knife can be used in the kitchen and for murder.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2019-06-05 o 19:03, ITschak Mugzach pisze:
Iebgener is the ibm recommanded utility to backup racf (called by irrut200).
ITschak
access to the RACF DB almost DESERVES to be hacked...
Regards; Phil J.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, 6 June 2019 2:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
W dniu 2019-06-02 o
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
W dniu 2019-06-02 o 21:48, ITschak Mugzach pisze:
> Sory to inform you: there are such SVCs available for download. I
> think there is one on the cbttape .
While such code is available for download it is not ava
Iebgener is the ibm recommanded utility to backup racf (called by irrut200).
ITschak
בתאריך יום ד׳, 5 ביוני 2019, 19:41, מאת R.S. <
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl>:
> W dniu 2019-06-02 o 21:48, ITschak Mugzach pisze:
> > Sory to inform you: there are such SVCs available for download. I think
>
W dniu 2019-06-02 o 21:48, ITschak Mugzach pisze:
Sory to inform you: there are such SVCs available for download. I think
there is one on the cbttape .
While such code is available for download it is not available for install.
Otherwise we talk about mistakes in configurations => human
W dniu 2019-06-03 o 05:30, ITschak Mugzach pisze:
I do? You must be joking. The thread is monopolized by one person. You know
who.
No, it's not.
Maybe Bill wrote the most, but other people also contributed
significantly, including you, Ray, Lenny, me, Shmuel, Clark, Tom and
others.
And
Correct
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, June 5, 2019, 12:25 PM, R.S.
wrote:
W dniu 2019-06-04 o 18:52, Clark Morris pisze:
> [Default] On 4 Jun 2019 08:56:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Bill Johnson) wrote:
>
> >From the
W dniu 2019-06-04 o 18:52, Clark Morris pisze:
[Default] On 4 Jun 2019 08:56:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Bill Johnson) wrote:
>From the you can't make this up department. Mr. Marchant agrees with me.
Regarding "you have never been hacked during 40 years".
Disclaimer: this is not my case, I only analyze it from logic point of
view.
Indeed Bill cannot be 100% sure ha had never been hacked. Just because
maybe he was hacked but the breach was not disclosed. However no one can
be 100% sure of
Multics... MVS and CA products 30 years ago...
I strongly believe that prehistory is not good argument for discussion
about contemporary systems.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2019-06-03 o 20:28, Clark Morris pisze:
[Default] On 3 Jun 2019 09:41:54 -0700, in
W dniu 2019-05-29 o 21:38, Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta) pisze:
In securing Mainframe:
One thing I've noticed over the years is how a Company will "hide" their Mainframe hardware.
The Hardware for me now is in a unmarked Building that looks like a bunker (I'm
told). Pretty bad that the
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:52:27 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
>Is there a mechanism for
>third party vendors that provide software that runs APF authorized to
>be somehow included in the statement of integrity or have recognized
>equivalents?
Other vendors are free to issue their own statements of
Agile: doing the wrong thing quickly
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 2:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure
Bad link
https://www.computerworld.com/article/2487425/target-breach-happened-because-of-a-basic-network-segmentation-error.html
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 12:53:11 PM EDT, Clark Morris
wrote:
[Default] On 4 Jun 2019 08:56:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
How target was hacked.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/2487425/target-breach-happened-because-of-a-basic-network-segmentation-error.html
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 12:52 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
[Default] On 4 Jun 2019 08:56:03 -0700, in
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 12:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
[Default] On 4 Jun 2019 08:56:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ
Not according to Target or any write ups I’ve read on it.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 12:52 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
[Default] On 4 Jun 2019 08:56:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Bill Johnson) wrote:
>From the
RACF comes with the OS. You turn it on and pay for it ONLY if you don’t have
ACF2 or TSS. And RACF has approx 80% market share.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 12:52 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
[Default] On 4 Jun 2019 08:56:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[Default] On 4 Jun 2019 08:56:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Bill Johnson) wrote:
>From the you cant make this up department. Mr. Marchant agrees with me.
>
>https://www.compuware.com/proving-z13-modern/
>
Considering that he is writing for a
_
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
> Clark Morris
> Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 9:57 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
>
> [Default] On 2 Jun 2019 14:4
equ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 11:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
>From the you can’t make this up department. Mr. Marchant agrees with me.
https://secure-web.
move this on PLEASE !
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Johnson" <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 10:45:31 AM
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
You
>From the you can’t make this up department. Mr. Marchant agrees with me.
https://www.compuware.com/proving-z13-modern/
Talk of “modernization” of mainframe systems is often code for redesigning
mainframe-based applications and implementing them to run on Windows, or less
frequently, on
00047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 10:45:31 AM
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
You have posted more to this thread than anyone else.
False
You have claimed that security is the main re
You have posted more to this thread than anyone else.
False
You have claimed that security is the main reason people stay on the
mainframe, and posted a few articles that do not say what you claimed
they say.
False, they all stated flatly security was a top 3 reason for staying on the
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 00:01:01 +, Bill Johnson wrote:
>noise and plenty of it.
PKB.
You have posted more to this thread than anyone else.
You have claimed that security is the main reason people stay on the
mainframe, and posted a few articles that do not say what you claimed
they say.
You
ware
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 2:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
It’s a little more than coincidence that 3 of the most vociferous posters who
ments would be naive.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 2:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
It’s a little more tha
Just maybe, they are the ones who understand the problems, as they spend time
focussed on them.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw | Security Lead | RSM Partners Ltd
Web: www.rsmpartners.com
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’
-Original Message-
From: IBM
It’s a little more than coincidence that 3 of the most vociferous posters who
claim the mainframe is not secure, all sell mainframe security services.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 8:59 AM, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
Lennie,
You are inviting 'he tries to sell his
Bill,
So you have not seen these things. Others have. Please accept their word for
this.
If you were as rich as Warren Buffet then you could afford to employ others to
work out if you need a haircut. Maybe you could teach yourself those skills.
Your logic takes us down a path of only taking
Lennie,
You are inviting 'he tries to sell his product / services' ...
ITschak
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:45 PM Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw <
lenni...@rsmpartners.com> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> It is very difficult to prove the negative. Hence, your claim that your
> system has never been hacked is
In 40 years, I’ve never seen any company I’ve worked for have their mainframe
hacked or compromised. Including a bank and multiple insurance companies. Plus,
I was in positions to know.
I have seen numerous hacks and compromises of non mainframe platforms at those
companies.
As Warren Buffett
Bill,
It is very difficult to prove the negative. Hence, your claim that your system
has never been hacked is difficult to prove. I think it is possible that your
system has been "hacked" and your data has been exfiltrated. There is no reason
for the hacker to call attention to that fact that
Quite different. The sell the security as part of the OS. They don’t then bash
the security (their own product) and try to sell you additional products.
IBM actually tells you how great mainframe security is and use it as a selling
point to industries where security is paramount.
Sent from
So does IBM
Lou
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:38 AM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> How do you demonstrate something that hasn’t happened? LOL
> I see your company sells security services too.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 4,
How do you demonstrate something that hasn’t happened? LOL
I see your company sells security services too.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 5:59 AM, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
wrote:
How do you demonstrate that you have never been hacked?
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw |
How do you demonstrate that you have never been hacked?
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw | Security Lead | RSM Partners Ltd
Web: www.rsmpartners.com
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
>>>> "40 years on numerous mainframes at more than a dozen companies and we’ve
>>>> never been hacked and never had any need for penetration testing."
...said King Priam to Cassandr
Bill Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 1:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
40 years on numerous mainframes at more than a dozen companies and we’ve never
been hacked and never had any need for penetration testing.
Sent from Yahoo M
*PLONK*
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Johnson
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2019 8:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
Lol, yeah, because the more someone
running z/OS?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Clark Morris
Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 9:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor
40 years on numerous mainframes at more than a dozen companies and we’ve never
been hacked and never had any need for penetration testing.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Monday, June 3, 2019, 11:54 AM, Clark Morris wrote:
[Default] On 2 Jun 2019 19:11:41 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
lating to security, ACF2, Pen testing, etc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Johnson
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2019 10:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
He’s s
___
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
> Clark Morris
> Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 9:57 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
>
> [Default] On 2 Jun 2019 14:46:41 -0700, in bit.listse
Have no idea about MultiCS, but can comment on 2 & 3 as I've seen many
installations here and in EU.
1. The best way is to check the product after it was installed by the
sysprog. I noticed that some of them skip installation steps. When it comes
to products that depend on USS, it can be
else."
"Or else what"
"Bad employee, bad employee."
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2019 1:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor
.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Clark Morris
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
[Default] On 3 Jun 2019 09:41
[Default] On 3 Jun 2019 09:41:54 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
>This whole thread has consistently confused several very different issues:
I agree and have questions in each of the areas.
>
> 1. How secure is z/OS itself?
I recall reading that Multics
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 5:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
He’s trying to sell his company’s security services. Something I thought was
not allowed on this list.
Sent from
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Clark Morris
Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 9:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
[Default] On 2 Jun 2019 14:46:41 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ
[Default] On 2 Jun 2019 19:11:41 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Bill Johnson) wrote:
>Hes selling plain and simple. So is Mugzak. Some laboratory bs that he will
>even show you in application code. Then no doubt analyze your application code
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
He’s selling plain and simple. So is Mugzak. Some laboratory bs that he will
even show you in application code. Then no doubt analyze your application code
for a small (large) fee. Nobody is saying
us?
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> of Ray Overby
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 7:19 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor E
He’s selling plain and simple. So is Mugzak. Some laboratory bs that he will
even show you in application code. Then no doubt analyze your application code
for a small (large) fee. Nobody is saying the mainframe is fool proof. But, it
is inherently (by design) more secure than any other
[Default] On 2 Jun 2019 14:46:41 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Bill Johnson) wrote:
>Hes trying to sell his companys security services. Something I thought was
>not allowed on this list.
>
Whether or not he is selling something and I don't read
mour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Ray
Overby
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 7:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
In response to "Sinc
M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
In response to "Since when does MODESET turn on the JSCBAUTH bit? Just
how do you propose that IBM prevent key zero code from setting it? Why
do think that turning on JSCBAUTH lets key zero code do anything that it
couldn't
Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 3:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
Sory to inform you: there are such SVCs available for download. I think
there is one on the cbttape .
בתאריך יום א׳
; thoroughly.
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> of ITschak Mugzach
> Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2019 2:42 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
1, 2019 2:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
We look for such SVC in our STIG compliance product IronSphere. We advise
adding ESM control in facility class to control who can use it in case this
SVC is a must.
ITschak
בתאריך שבת, 1 ביו
gt; anyways? If the installation doesn't control what goes into its authorized
> libraries then the vulnerability is in management, not in the platform.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> >
> > __
ason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Jesse 1
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 5:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
It must be Friday somewhere. I put 'against stupidity' into Googl
_
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 5:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
It must be Friday somewhere. I put 'against stupidity' into Google. Schiller's
exact quote popped
...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ray
Overby
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 11:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Fwd: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
In response to "Please note that an unprivi
o:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Schuffenhauer, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 2:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Fwd: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
⚠ EXTERNAL MESSAGE – Think Before You Click
My sales favorite was knowing key functionality is vaporware,
!
.
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "ITschak Mugzach"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 8:01:48 AM
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
Carmen, t think you are mixing event audit (siem product like qradar) with
st
eam some
> insight as to what security issues we all have in the enterprise, Winders,
> AIX, Linux and Z.
>
>
>
> Carmen Vitullo
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "ITschak Mugzach"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 201
issues we all have in the enterprise, Winders, AIX, Linux and
Z.
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "ITschak Mugzach"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 7:26:10 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
Where i
IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 5:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
On Tue, 28 May 2019 20:41:50 +, Seymour J Metz wrot
On Tue, 28 May 2019 20:41:50 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>What if you have a business need to make files available to the general
>public? Do you really believe that the web infrastructure is any more secure
>than FTP, or even as secure?
>
There are tools to enforce user authentication.
85 matches
Mail list logo
