9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 2017/08/21 06:51
> Subject: Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
>
> A closing note: The binder has four entry
> poi
A closing note: The binder has four entry points: IEWBLINK, IEWBLOAD, IEWBLODI
(the one
I had trouble with), and IEWBLDGO.
Of these four, only IEWBLINK binds into a program library. The other
three do perform in-core binding.
Yet, the "z/OS V2R2 MVS Program Management: Advanced Facilities"
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:59:08 -0700, Tom Ross
wrote:
>
>>Everyone talks about WSOPT vs NOWSOPT compiler option, but I can't find the=
>>m documented in COBOL documentation library.
>>Are WSOPT and NOWSOPT some nicknames of the accurate terms?
>>Where are they
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Now imagine that the DLL gets loaded repeatedly and in each case only one of
the programs it contains is actually executed. That case could have
performance problems in the C world because the static data for all of the few
thousand independent programs is created and
Sounds like someone ought to fix that! ;)
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of
Allan Kielstra <kiels...@ca.ibm.com>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 5:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MSGIEW2678S Mod
Yes a C DLL does have all static variables allocated and initialized when a DLL
is loaded. This is usually fine. However suppose you had a few thousand
independent programs that you linked into a DLL simply for packaging purposes.
And suppose that each program had a lot of static storage
7 4:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes
>On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:18:51 +, Frank Swarbrick <frank.swarbrick@OUTLOOK=
>.COM> wrote:
>
>>There was a post to ibm-main by Allan Kielstra of IBM compiler development=
&
>On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:18:51 +, Frank Swarbrick .COM> wrote:
>
>>There was a post to ibm-main by Allan Kielstra of IBM compiler development=
> (I think) on May 10, 2017 (How are Program Object sections with Defer attr=
>ibute loaded?) that discusses how the writable
when I said "nowhere known to IEWBLODI for the deferred classes to be
loaded from", I was thinking that IEWBLODI takes input from
, and builds an executable in storage.
Tony,
I think of it that the binder has everything, just as it would when saving
the executable to a data set.
The deferred
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:18:51 +, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
>
>There was a post to ibm-main by Allan Kielstra of IBM compiler development (I
>think) on May 10, 2017 (How are Program Object sections with Defer attribute
>loaded?) that discusses how the writable
August 10, 2017 12:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:18:51 +, Frank Swarbrick
<frank.swarbr...@outlook.com> wrote:
>There was a post to ibm-main by Allan Kielstra of IBM compiler developm
On 10 August 2017 at 08:05, Peter Relson wrote:
>
> And the resulting IEW2678S makes sense in that context, because there
> is nowhere known to IEWBLODI for the deferred classes to be loaded
> from. So asking IBM to support deferred classes in IEWBLODI (or
> IEWBLOAD, which is
And the resulting IEW2678S makes sense in that context, because there
is nowhere known to IEWBLODI for the deferred classes to be loaded
from. So asking IBM to support deferred classes in IEWBLODI (or
IEWBLOAD, which is the same thing except without the IDENTIFY), makes
little sense. What might
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:18:51 +, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
>There was a post to ibm-main by Allan Kielstra of IBM compiler development (I
>think) on May 10, 2017 (How are Program Object sections with Defer attribute
>loaded?) that discusses how the writable static
PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes
As I understand it, at least all debugging information (TEST option) is now
added as deferred data classes in the program object instead of being sent to a
separate dataset at compile time.
The CO
Ross could explain that part to us.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 3:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more
if that eliminates all deferred classes though.
HTH
Pe6ter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Giliad Wilf
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 13:37:54 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>And the resulting IEW2678S makes sense in that context, because there
>is nowhere known to IEWBLODI for the deferred classes to be loaded
>from. So asking IBM to support deferred classes in IEWBLODI (or
>IEWBLOAD, which
On 9 August 2017 at 12:34, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:10:53 -0500 Giliad Wilf wrote:
> :>You got it right.
> :>I need to further analyze the source to find out what else was IEWBLODI
> supposed to do there.
>
> It builds the module in memory
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:10:53 -0500 Giliad Wilf
> <00d50942efa9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> :>On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:41:04 -0500, John McKown <
> john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> :>
>
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:10:53 -0500 Giliad Wilf
<00d50942efa9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
:>On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:41:04 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
:>
:>>I'm probably not really understanding what you want to do. So I'll give a
:>>try at an alternate
[Default] On 9 Aug 2017 06:09:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
00d50942efa9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Giliad Wilf) wrote:
>On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:41:04 -0500, John McKown
>wrote:
>
>>I'm probably not really understanding what you want to do. So I'll give
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:41:04 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
>I'm probably not really understanding what you want to do. So I'll give a
>try at an alternate explanation for what I _think_ you want. You have a
>"test" version of a program, call it TESTPGM, in your
I'm probably not really understanding what you want to do. So I'll give a
try at an alternate explanation for what I _think_ you want. You have a
"test" version of a program, call it TESTPGM, in your production PDSE. This
is a test version of PRODPGM in the same PDSE. You have another program,
24 matches
Mail list logo