Re: NetView session manager - Session Clone

Yes - Under USER ADMIN - copy profile function Marshall -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 2:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXT] NetView session manager - Session Clone

NetView session manager - Session Clone

Hi I have never used NetView session manager and my experience is just with TPX and Supersession. Under NetView do we have an option to clone an existing user sessions to a new NetView user ? Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: Session Manager

To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Session Manager I think that the entry in the default IBM logmode table (ISTINCLM) is D4B32XX3 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Edward Finnell Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 10:2

Re: Session Manager

: Session Manager Screen size from host is determined by LOGMODE. If you can get to SDSF do a WHO command and it will show what you're being dealt. What you need is a LOGMODE with Query Bit on in PSERVIC. If it's allowed can do ===>LOGON applid(SES_MGR_APPLID) LOGMOD(D4B32xx) (I think tha

Re: Session Manager

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of Elardus Engelbrecht <elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 7:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Session Manager Bruce Hewson wr

Re: Session Manager

one). In a message dated 3/13/2018 3:19:27 AM Central Standard Time, bruce_hew...@hotmail.com writes:   Among the Session Managers I can use here, if I access using my favourite screen size 62x140 (which TSO/ISPF has no issue with), the Session Manager drops to Model-2 24x80. Possibly a constra

Re: Session Manager

Bruce Hewson wrote: >Among the Session Managers I can use here, if I access using my favourite >screen size 62x140 (which TSO/ISPF has no issue with), the Session Manager >drops to Model-2 24x80. Possibly a constraint by product administrators. Even >if I access using 62x160,

Re: Session Manager

If your session manager can only do 24x80, then I hope it's free, because it's almost worthless. Lacking much information, my guess is that it's an admin problem. I was a systems programmer long ago, and supported VTAM, TPX and NetView. >20 years ago they had no issue with any screen size (

Re: Session Manager

Hello Shmuel, Among the Session Managers I can use here, if I access using my favourite screen size 62x140 (which TSO/ISPF has no issue with), the Session Manager drops to Model-2 24x80. Possibly a constraint by product administrators. Even if I access using 62x160, a valid size for HOD

Re: Session Manager

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of David Boyes <dbo...@sinenomine.net> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 3:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Session Manager On 3/12/18, 2:19 PM, "IBM Mainfram

Re: Session Manager

ssions in play (terminal-> session manager, session manager-> application), the second session was restricted to the lowest common denominator (24x80) if you wanted to support arbitrary incoming screen sizes because there was no way to pass actual terminal geometry to the second session witho

Re: Session Manager

Right. And VPNs are so flaky you really need a session manager if you come in through one. I certainly do, anyway. Cheers, Martin Martin Packer zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com Twitter / Facebook

Re: Session Manager

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of Bruce Hewson <bruce_hew...@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2018 8:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Session Manager Regarding Session Supervisor products in the modern day and a

Re: Session Manager

The main thing I liked about a session manager (TPX, when I worked with Skip) was that if I had some kind of PC or network problem, or even if I closed the emulator and went home to continue work, all my VTAM sessions remained connected. Bruce Hewson wrote: Do you really need a Terminal

Re: Session Manager

Alias" entries to select from. On occasions I have had 29 TN3270 Vista terminal sessions open concurrently. (Thanks to Tom for quick update to make that possible). Do you really need a Terminal Session Manager? Regards Bruce

Re: Session Manager

https://youtu.be/jKOxlK32Kpc Check this for a session manager > Am 08.03.2018 um 19:28 schrieb Mark Regan <marktre...@gmail.com>: > > Another option would be to use a tn3270 emulator that keeps all the > sessions within one window, but have individual session tabs at th

Re: Session Manager

sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: > You should be able to find a session manager hat communicates with its > peers via IP. Any other requirements?t > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > From: IBM

Re: Session Manager

You should be able to find a session manager hat communicates with its peers via IP. Any other requirements?t -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of Ga

Re: Session Manager

on that LPAR. You can connect multiple Tubes systems in this manner and access all of your applications across all of your LPARs. On the secondary subject of why you might need a Session Manager - our customers are super keen on security, compliance & auditing and accessibility. For security they

Re: Session Manager

Gadi, MacKinney Systems sells a very affordable VTAM session manager we call VTAM/Switch. We'd be glad to talk to you about it. But if you do not have connectivity between the LPARs, no z/OS-based session manager will be able to acquire a session in a different LPAR. If you mainly want

Re: Session Manager

Not at this time -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Session Manager But u can use enterprise extender to bridge sna over ip

Re: Session Manager

LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach > Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:48 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Session Manager > > You only need single tn3270 session if you use a kind of session manager. > Once you are in, it wil use cross domain to conn

Re: Session Manager

There is no SNA communication between the LPARS. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:48 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Session Manager You only need single

Re: Session Manager

You only need single tn3270 session if you use a kind of session manager. Once you are in, it wil use cross domain to connect to other lpars. ITschak בתאריך 8 במרץ 2018 7:38,‏ "Gadi Ben-Avi" <gad...@malam.com> כתב: > There are only IP connections to each of the partitions

Re: Session Manager

There are only IP connections to each of the partitions. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 9:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Session Manager Do you mean

Re: Session Manager

Do you mean that the only connection is through the LAN? If there is no connection for VTAM that's one thing, but if there isn't even IP access to other partitions then you can't have a session manager. Please clarify. TSO is able to detect the IP address for a TN3270 session in support of WSA

Re: Session Manager

I've used (only) [CA-]TPX since the 80s. It's common in (somewhat) larger shops to use a session manager for several reasons. 1. With several LPARs, the number of required logons can balloon dramatically. TSO. SMCS. Omegamon. CICS. CICS alone accounts for dozens (!) of our logon requirements

Re: Session Manager

The system I am talking about has 4 LPARs I need at least: 1 session for TSO/ISPF 2 Session for Omegamon - might need to have more. So that is already 8 sessions. For each of those, I have to be sure I'm working on the right system. This is my main cause for getting a session manager. Making

Re: Session Manager

Jousma, David wrote: >Mark, I get all those, but are those enough to justify the cost? TN3270 >connections are *free*, yes there is an imposition if your sessions are >dropped, but how often is that occurring? Do you still run with a session >manager? I have not for over 20

Re: Session Manager

W dniu 2018-03-07 o 13:34, Mark Regan pisze: Several selling points for using a session manager are: 1) you only have to make one tn3270 connection, as long as you have SNA connectivity with all the LPARS you want to have SNA sessions with; 2) if you lose that tn3270 connection, when you log

Re: Session Manager

Gadi, I may be too old school, but for a session manager to work there needs to be a connection between lpars. Naturally all the session managers you mentioned will do the job. I have used Supersession for years and for the most part have had no issues. As for the comments about why have

Re: Session Manager

Mark, I get all those, but are those enough to justify the cost? TN3270 connections are *free*, yes there is an imposition if your sessions are dropped, but how often is that occurring? Do you still run with a session manager? I have not for over 20 years. I guess I've gotten so used

Re: Session Manager

Several selling points for using a session manager are: 1) you only have to make one tn3270 connection, as long as you have SNA connectivity with all the LPARS you want to have SNA sessions with; 2) if you lose that tn3270 connection, when you log back into it, your active 3270 sessions are still

Re: Session Manager

Try virtel from syspertec there is a session manager include Bin unterwegs hab nur iPhone zur Verfügung. > Am 07.03.2018 um 09:27 schrieb Gadi Ben-Avi <gad...@malam.com>: > > Hi, > > I am looking for recommendations for a session manager for z/OS. > > I know of I

Re: Session Manager

Isn't the idea of a session manager kinda fading into the sunset? These were popular back in the days of coax attached 3270 terminals, but these days, having as many emulator windows open on your workstation is easier? Not criticizing, just curious on the need I guess

Session Manager

Hi, I am looking for recommendations for a session manager for z/OS. I know of IBM's CL/SupperSession, CA's TPX and NetPass. Ideally, We are looking for something that would be able to access sessions on multiple partitions that are not connected in any way. The systems run z/OS v2.2 Thanks

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

t; > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Roberto Halais > Sent: 19 August 2017 02:04 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Session Manager replacement > > > > Thank you Ed

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Session Manager replacement Thank you Ed. Good info to know. On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:43 AM Ed Jaffe <edja...@phoenixsoftware.com<mailto:edja...@phoenixsoftware.com>> wrote: > On 8/17/2017 3:20 PM, Roberto Halais wrote: > > IBM

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

There is one product that does exactly the same from Macro4 as they wrote and support The IBM session manager. Crispin Hugo Systems Specialist Macro 4 Limited d: +44 1293 872121 | m: +44 7753951308 | t: +44 1293 872000 | www.macro4.com        Registered office: The Orangery, Turners Hill Road

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

On Aug 18, 2017, at 12:09 PM, Wendell Lovewell wrote: > > MacKinney Systems as VTAM/Switch. We’ve been using this for years, and are quite happy with it. -- Pew, Curtis G curtis@austin.utexas.edu ITS Systems/Core/Administrative Services

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

MacKinney Systems as VTAM/Switch. We'll help you with converting your session manager definitions, and more than a couple of you could license it for $60k a year! (Dennis, give us a call!) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Roberto Halais Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 3:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IBM Session Manager replacement Hi listers: IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be p

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

Thank you Ed. Good info to know. On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:43 AM Ed Jaffe <edja...@phoenixsoftware.com> wrote: > On 8/17/2017 3:20 PM, Roberto Halais wrote: > > IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by > the > > end of 2018. > > >

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

On 8/17/2017 3:20 PM, Roberto Halais wrote: IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the end of 2018. They suggest we migrate to IBM CL/Supersession. I would like to know of other vendor products that do a similar function. IBM Session Manager for z/OS is Macro

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Roberto Halais Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 10:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXT] Re: IBM Session Manager replacement Thank you all for your responses these will help inmensely. Again. Thank you Roberto On Aug 18

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

.ua.edu>: > > > > There is also TUBES from Macro 4. > > > > > >On Friday, August 18, 2017 7:53 AM, Wolfgang Fritz < > 016acdc52809-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > There is another possibility try >

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

marc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>: > > There is also TUBES from Macro 4. > > >On Friday, August 18, 2017 7:53 AM, Wolfgang Fritz > <016acdc52809-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > Hi > There is another possibility try > Syspertec Virtel

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

There is also TUBES from Macro 4. On Friday, August 18, 2017 7:53 AM, Wolfgang Fritz <016acdc52809-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Hi There is another possibility try Syspertec Virtel there is a Session manager Included and you could earn your 3270 emulation you wor

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

Hi There is another possibility try Syspertec Virtel there is a Session manager Included and you could earn your 3270 emulation you work only browser based with a http/SNA gateway RegArds Wolfgang -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

Roberto, Have a read of the Announcement Letter (https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=an=ca=gpateam=897=ENUS215-356) for CL/Supersession and in particular the section titled "ESW trade-up - Ordering information" . You may find that it may be a NO cost option

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

Of Roberto Halais Sent: 17 August 2017 23:20 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IBM Session Manager replacement Hi listers: IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the end of 2018. They suggest we migrate to IBM CL/Supersession. I would like to know of other

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

d1...@comcast.net>: > > > > On Aug 17, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Roberto Halais <roberto.hal...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi listers: > > > > > > IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by > > the >

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

: http://br.linkedin.com/in/lrosalen Phone: +48 (71) 792 809 198 2017-08-18 5:59 GMT+02:00 Edward Gould <edgould1...@comcast.net>: > > On Aug 17, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Roberto Halais <roberto.hal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi listers: > > > >

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

> On Aug 17, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Roberto Halais <roberto.hal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi listers: > > IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the > end of 2018. > > They suggest we migrate to IBM CL/Supersession. > > I would l

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

NCPASS is used by DOD and it is used for authentication Steve -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Session Manager

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

I have had both CL/Supersssion and TPX TPX is a pos in my opinion -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Regan Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 6:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Session Manager

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

NETPASS from BIS > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Mark Regan > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 4:57 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Session Manager replacement > &

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

There is TPX from CA. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017, 18:21 Roberto Halais <roberto.hal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi listers: > > IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the > end of 2018. > > They suggest we migrate to IBM CL/Supersession. > >

Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

Super session is a good product originally written by Candle Sent from my iPhone Sorry for any grammar problems > On Aug 17, 2017, at 17:20, Roberto Halais <roberto.hal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi listers: > > IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be ph

IBM Session Manager replacement

Hi listers: IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the end of 2018. They suggest we migrate to IBM CL/Supersession. I would like to know of other vendor products that do a similar function. I will be searching but thought of tapping into your experience. Thank

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

Forgot to mention that by using RACF PassTickets then you remove the potential that user-ids and passwords are visible in plain text over the network or in memory or on a DASD etc, depending on your non-PassTicket approach. Again RACF PassTickets are a big plus for security and the auditors.

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

-on to all their applications. Whatever the approach please don't expect the poor end-user to remember multiple passwords - they will only write them all down on a whiteboard! This is one of the key benefits of using a session manager - centralized security, administration and control. With also

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Longnecker, Dennis Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 6:58 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement I would agree with the below. The remote screen via capability is excellent

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

screen or have them do a single thing. Also, TPX at least, produces wonderful SMF records. So no matter what VTAM application they visit, I can produce reports on the total number of transactions they did, along with signon times for both the session manager and any VTAM applications. Oh

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

vailable in December, 2015, is the replacement product. That's IBM Program Number 5601-B28. If you're interested in CL/SUPERSESSION, "talk to your friendly IBM representative." However, again, no need to panic. IBM Session Manager for z/OS (5655-U98) was withdrawn from marketing on Janua

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

We depend heavily on TPX here. A session manager provides two key benefits: 1) A session manager 'holds' a session from which the user gets disconnected. Nowadays TSO/E is pretty good at reconnection, but other VTAM applications do not have this capability. There is no substitute

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

IBM's preferred session manager was IBM Session Manager (ISM), for which they have announced support will cease in 2018. Macro 4's Tubes for z/OS product is fully compatible with ISM and I understand many clients have migrated in a few hours without configuration changes. Tubes from Macro 4

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

> On Feb 7, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Dana Mitchell <mitchd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think Tubes was acquired by IBM and became IBM Session Manager in the early > 2000's. We converted several systems TPX, Cl/SuperSession etc to it at the > time as part of the push to convert fro

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

Stone, Marshall wrote: >Does anyone have the link/URL for the NVAS announcement? See below URL for 5695-036. (Watch the wap!!!) http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=dd=sm=ShopzSeries=897/ENUS5695-036 According to this URL below 5695-036 is supposed (?) to be

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

://www.macro4.com/solutions/products/dumpmaster/index.html nt I think Tubes was acquired by IBM and became IBM Session Manager in the early 2000's. We converted several systems TPX, Cl/SuperSession etc to it at the time as part of the push to convert from ISV products to IBM products. I haven't

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

I think Tubes was acquired by IBM and became IBM Session Manager in the early 2000's. We converted several systems TPX, Cl/SuperSession etc to it at the time as part of the push to convert from ISV products to IBM products. I haven't needed/worked with a session manager for many years

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement Hello list, IBM announced Tivoli Netview Access Services for MVS being withdrawn come 09/10/2018. Anyone knows of a similar replacement on the market with same features? I know IBM also has the old Candle CL/SuperSession. I'm wondering if others

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement I've used TPX, Teleview, not sure of Teleview is now TPX, both from CA, Tubes from MACRO4 just to name just a few Carmen - Original Message - From: "Salah Balboul" <balbo...@att.net> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Salah Balboul [balbo...@att.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 8:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement Hello list, IBM announced Tivoli Netview Access Services for MVS being withdrawn come 09/10/2018. Anyone knows

Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

ect: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement Hello list, IBM announced Tivoli Netview Access Services for MVS being withdrawn come 09/10/2018. Anyone knows of a similar replacement on the market with same features? I know IBM also has the old Candle CL/SuperSession. I'm wondering if others ar

IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

Hello list, IBM announced Tivoli Netview Access Services for MVS being withdrawn come 09/10/2018. Anyone knows of a similar replacement on the market with same features? I know IBM also has the old Candle CL/SuperSession. I'm wondering if others are using non-IBM products for session

FW: Help with IBM Session Manager Prefix Command

L - Eagan, MN Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 3:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Help with IBM Session Manager Prefix Command Dear Session Manager Experts, On the main ISM menu I see a description for My Appl. To the left is the number. From the command line on the bottom I can

Help with IBM Session Manager Prefix Command

Dear Session Manager Experts, On the main ISM menu I see a description for My Appl. To the left is the number. From the command line on the bottom I can enter 35 to get to My Appl. I can enter S as a prefix command to select 35/My Appl. I am looking for documentation on what a G does

Re: IBM Session Manager

I used Bing.com and IBM SESSION MANAGER SETUP and came up with this URL http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246459.pdf IBM Session Manager Implementation Is this what you are looking for? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN

Re: IBM Session Manager

Excellent, thanks Lizette. Jim McAlpine. On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.comwrote: I used Bing.com and IBM SESSION MANAGER SETUP and came up with this URL http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246459.pdf IBM Session Manager Implementation