I have written a C program using threads and have a question. I have an ext=
ernal message table that I need to be persistent between threads. The mess=
age table is loaded from an external QSAM file. Program in Cobol loads the =
table. I want to be able to use the message table in other threads.
Fundamental question:
How can the tool recognize which transactions are mobile?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie
jej adresat z
Hi,
Once in a while we receive this series of messages:
14128 13:58:52.67 STC17917 0090 *EZZ9308E UNRESPONSIVE NAME SERVER DETECTED
AT IP ADDRESS x.x.x.x
14128 13:58:52.67 STC17917 0090 EZZ9310I NAME SERVER x.x.x.x 409
409 0090 TOTAL NUMBER OF QUERIES
I agree that getting an exact 100% average over multiple minutes is going to be
somewhat unlikely. But we can get close.
From RMF's Partition Data Report:
--- PHYSICAL PROCESSORS ---
LPAR MGMT EFFECTIVE TOTAL
0.02 8.60 8.62
0.12 78.81 78.93
0.05 11.53 11.58
Gadi,
Have a look at the Comms Server IP Diagnosis Guide
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r12.hald001%2Fstepmesre.htm
Roger
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Tom,
Thank you very much, I appreciate the clarification, I thought this was how
threading worked with Cobol but wanted to make sure.
Regards,
Scott
From: Tom Ross
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 2:02 AM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I have written a C program using
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I've worked for a bank and a wholesaler that both routinely ran at 100%.
Service levels were met, but people were always griping about the usage.
As John said, no harm no foul.
Agreed.
Over the years we see the CPU Utilization graphs as follow (from midnight to
next
I have had the same problem. I am sure it is network related but my network
folks say nothing has changed... to that I say... why did it just start
occurring without any change anywhere.
I was forced to add:
RESOLVERTIMEOUT 10
UNRESPONSIVETHRESHOLD(85)
Note that your current level of failure is
Kevin is right about the complete chain.
I issued this openssl command:
openssl s_client -connect ftp.s390.mainline.com:21 -starttls ftp -tls1
-CAfile gd-class2-root.crt
and got error:
Verify return code: 21 (unable to verify the first certificate)
I created a cacerts file with both the
I left off the and
I have doubled the amount of time that it gathers attempts to calculate
the percentage *and the time it allows for an attempt to be considered a
failure.*
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Keith Smith keith.sm...@shawinc.com wrote:
I have had the same problem. I am sure it
W dniu 2014-05-08 12:44, Shane Ginnane pisze:
Oh joy, just what we all need, yet another pricing model.
Timothy offered his rendition - I wonder how much extra business it will
generate for people like Al and Cheryl.
Well, I was first customer of WLC and we are (were) very happy of that
In 5630949866383476.wa.butlerjus.ibm@listserv.ua.edu, on
05/06/2014
at 01:14 PM, Jon Butler butl...@us.ibm.com said:
I have a problem where I need to Edit/view source code to vet it
for compliance to corporate standards.
With what RECFM?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
I used to work at an insurance company that refused to add capacity. When we
ran quarterly processing, later changed to monthly processing, the machine was
pegged for a day or two. We couldn't do any testing because production sucked
up all of the resources. The processor and software
I would add: and test work suffered because your goals were set so. z/OS will
always do what you tell it to do b.m.o. your goal definitions.
This is quite different from other platforms, that already start doing
problematic above 30%. I have seen Linux machines being reboot, because even
the
Interesting: I suspect that nowadays the words only testing or only
development will play differently. It's my contention that increasingly
getting function out the door is part of a company's attempt to compete.
I wonder how many companies will be able to defer Development / Test going
It *IS* definitely a DNS request. Tracking it down to the requestor will be
some hard work.
This is RESOLVER telling you it was unable to contact the designated DNS with
the defined time period.
As other have stated, there are some knobs that can be turned to reduce the
frequency of this
I'm not *opposed* to the idea, but you might want to suggest why this is
somehow better than IBM-MAIN (plus archives). One view says This would
fragment the community, which would NOT be a good thing.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Christopher Hodgins
chris.hodg...@uk.ibm.com wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a program that can text a phone, just like XMITIP?
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*IT Enterprise Applications*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
*(561) 707-3496 (mobile)*
*School District of Palm Beach County*
*3348 Forest Hill Blvd.*
*Room B-251*
*West Palm
Couldn't you just use SMTP and send an email to the phone? We used something
like that and then just sent an email to xxx...@vtext.com for Verizon
phones and it worked fine (as long as SMTP is running).
Todd Burrell, PMP, ITIL Expert, CISSP | Project Manager | ITSO AHB | Centers
for
Yes, all the cell providers support email-to-text. Google email to text
or vtext messaging,sprintpcs.com (no quotes) will likely find it (since I
know offhand that those are the domains for Verizon and Sprint, so that'll
likely find a page with the rest).
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Burrell,
We use XMITIP to do that very thing. But it works by sending a email to a
email-to-SMS-text gateway server in the cloud somewhere. Basically we
send the email from z/OS to our MS Exchange email server with a name. The
MS Exchange server transforms that name into something like:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
05/07/2014 12:36:00 PM:
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
On Wed, 7 May 2014 12:28:25 -0400, Bill Ashton wrote:
... The file is a VB file with LRECL=0 and BLKSIZE=4096. ...
???
If you ask the wrong question, the
Hello,
I am trying to set a SLIP for a transaction (program) that runs under CICS and
having no luck.
I have tried searching but have not run across any useful information thus far.
Could somebody either point me to where I can read up on setting an IF SLIP for
a CICS program
or tell me
Hi zMan,
I've been answering similar points in the CICS-L mailing list, so I'll
link you to the full discussion in the archives below. To briefly
summarise though, the mailing lists are awesome and this isn't an attempt
to fragment the community. It's an attempt to reach out to potentially new
Tom,
Looking here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/igy3pg31/4.4
quote
For the data that you want to isolate to an individual program invocation
instance, define the data in the LOCAL-STORAGE SECTION. In general, this
choice is appropriate for working data in threaded
I personally would STRONGLY discourage this implementation. You're not the only
one in your environment.
Why not do it correctly and allocate from shared storage pool. Use either C's
or assemblers implementation. Remember if you do it once, someone else will
think this clever and use it
I have just noticed that IPCS option 2.4 does not format Linkage
Stack entries under z/OS 2.1. All I get is this:
LINKAGE STACK ENTRY 00 FROM TCB. LSED: 7F773010
LSEH: 7F773000
FNXT. BSEA. TYPE. 89
Thanks... It works perfectly! I'm using XMITIP with the phone #...
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*IT Enterprise Applications*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
*(561) 707-3496 (mobile)*
*School District of Palm Beach County*
*3348 Forest Hill Blvd.*
*Room B-251*
*West
Thanks... It works perfectly! I'm using XMITIP with the phone #@
messaging.sprintpcs.com since that's who we use...
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*IT Enterprise Applications*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
*(561) 707-3496 (mobile)*
*School District of Palm Beach
I assume it's complete - I don't see an obvious error.
Digital certificate information for
CERTAUTH:
Label: Go Daddy Class
2
Certificate ID:
2QiJmZmDhZmjgceWQMSBhISoQMOTgaKiQPJA
Status:
TRUST
Start Date: 2004/06/29
13:06:20
End Date: 2034/06/29
13:06:20
Serial
Number:
00
I have just noticed that IPCS option 2.4 does not format Linkage Stack
entries under z/OS 2.1
I believe you are picking up an old Parmlib version of IEAVIPCS. Sorry but we
didn’t document well what we changed.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
The root cert is all that should be needed on the z/OS side,
if linux side is set up correctly.
But as mentioned in my last email, it doesn't look like the
linux side cert file is complete. Your server cert is issued
by a GoDaddy intermediate cert, which is issued by a
GoDaddy root cert. I
Don't know if it is doable, but should be easy to test.
.
.
.
//OUTDD DD PATHOPS (and other appropriate parameters).
//SYSIN DD * *
Dump/copy ds() OUTDD(OUTDD)..
/*
Then attempt to copy/restore from hfs/zfs/nfs archive for verification.
HTH,
snipSubject: Is it possible to have
On Thu, 8 May 2014 14:36:22 +, Bob Shannon wrote:
I believe you are picking up an old Parmlib version of IEAVIPCS.
Thanks, Bob. That was it.
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
We have this kind of modification , it is in CBT 880.
On 08.05.2014 16:38, Tsai Laurence wrote:
Dears , as the subject , any resolution ? need to have the output file
placed onto z/OS USS environment . So that I can using z/OS NFS client to
store those backup output files onto remote servers.
John,
As always my friend excellent points.
I have a follow on question can you pass a created user heap from thread to
thread ??
Regards,
Scott
From: John McKown
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 10:04 AM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Tom,
Looking here:
Hi
Looking into the Runtime Diagnostic, some question's:
Who is issuing the ANALYZE command, and how often ?
For me the answer in an idle z9 comes in about 3-4 seconds with NO
EVENTS , but any way to trigger something if
there would be some event ?
On 07.05.2014 14:37, Dana Mitchell
Why do you need a op system to validate the I/O ?
You should be able to see the CHPID's that are online and operating from the HMC
The CE should be able to do this from single object mode or from service mode
As mentioned if DASD looks OK, it is just a matter of accessing it
You can build a new
The distinction between COBOL's distinction of WORKING-STORAGE and
LOCAL-STORAGE is essentially the same as the PL/I and then C
distinction of static and automatic storage.
As far as I can judge from earlier posts in this thread the shared
facility is not a dynamic shared control block; it is a
Jon,
Its not my call ….I am only the guy asking the questions.
From: Jon Perryman
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 10:05 AM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I personally would STRONGLY discourage this implementation. You're not the only
one in your environment.
Why not
Hi friends,
The VM Workshop is asking the community to take a 12 question survey to help us
better understand the current state of your VM/Linux initiatives. The responses
will be used to help us focus session content, and will be shared at the
Workshop. Those who participate will get the
If the original volume was not IPL'able, then maybe the IPL data got
damaged. You could try updating the IPL data on the RES volume from the starter
system.
If in the worst case, you should still be able to re-use existing volumes.
Hardware support told you the DS6800 is fine. Instead of
You do not need a remote HMC. You just need to have the local HMC available
through the Internet with remote access allowed. I do this all the time.
Could save you some time if that could happen.
On Thu, 8 May 2014 12:39:37 -0500, Karl Severson karl_j_sever...@raytheon.com
wrote:
If the
Agreed - I couldn't support my environment without remote HMC access.
Jerry Whitteridge
Lead Systems Programmer
Safeway Inc.
925 951 4184
If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
On Wed, 7 May 2014 20:05:58 -0400, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
Think the key is get a working VM system by whatever means available. From
there validate IO config.
The only z/VM things you can IPL from tape are a z/VM installation tape, IOCP,
ICKDSF, DDR, and standalone dump. Tape
The ZZSA idea and remote access to their HMC (or a plane ticket) are the two
tools you need for this problem.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Right. At our shop, we have a Microsoft Terminal Services Gateway server.
At home, on one of my laptops, I can connect over the Internet to this TSG
Gateway. This then relays me to my local desktop (I know the OP doesn't
have a local desktop, he could go to some other desktop). I am now
We are prepping for an upgrade to z/OS 2.1. We have performed the required
changes to remove the use of BPX.DEFAULT.USER.
This has caused multiple loggings from our CICS regions against the region
LOGONID. I have been told our ACF2 configuration is incorrect, but have not
received
http://www.vm.ibm.com/eval/ is the page to download the evaluation
z/VM ?5.3?). Or ordering 5.2, 5.3, 6.1. Get the file downloaded and
burned on a DVD-R by the local staff and inserted into the DVD drive.
http://www.cbttape.org/~jjaeger/zzsa.html Is the stand alone ZZSA files. CD-R.
On Thu,
Jon,
Can you point me to the shared memory you spoke of in C …I would prefer to
write this in C / Assembler…get away from
Cobol, not that I don't like it. We are a small vendor ….
It would be much appreciated
From: John McKown
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 10:04 AM
To: IBM
And where is this DVD going to load to if cpu / lpar whatever is not seeing any
devices ?
To single line edit mode on HMC
Can't even get to ICC if OSA /OSC is not reconized
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Schwab
Our auditors will not allow remote access to the HMC's
But in his case if they expected him to support it remotely probably a
different story
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014
Hi,
We're looking to purchase a sw product and our lawyers are looking at the t's
and c's to see if we can have the right to their source code. At my previous
job we did this for BMC, we kept it at IMAR. I guess I never understand why,
so I'm asking if anyone our there does this and for
Dean,
I have worked for vendors that dealt with this. Typically, a contract addendum
or stipulation is added so that the vendor software is kept at a 3rd party site
in escrow.
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant
www.lcmg.us
-Original Message-
From: Dno
We recently upgraded z/VM to 6.2. I downloaded the product from
ShopzSeries. Burning a DVD turned into drawn-out PMR. See SHARE Anaheim
proceedings for session 14648: Bit Bucket x'2E' beginning at slide 75.
Upshot was that you have to use software that understands and creates ISO
images. The
W dniu 2014-05-08 21:23, August Carideo/RYE/US pisze:
Our auditors will not allow remote access to the HMC's
rethorical
And the justification to the restriction is?
/rethorical
Every access means some flexibility, some productivity, some gain and -
form the other hand - some risk. The safest
W dniu 2014-05-08 21:00, August Carideo/RYE/US pisze:
And where is this DVD going to load to if cpu / lpar whatever is not seeing any
devices ?
To single line edit mode on HMC
Can't even get to ICC if OSA /OSC is not reconized
Well, hard scenario.
Actually you can IPL from DVD, (*no! it's ftp
Agreed
If the problem Is the I/O config
It doesn't matter what op sys will eventually run on the box
You can code up a I/O gen on notepad put it on a USB stick
Upload it from the HMC use the SA version of the gen read in the source code
and load out the IOCDS
And do a POR
Just to get you
The evaluation version was an ISO image designed to be burned to a
DVD, inserted into the HMC, and booted from. Hopefully you would then
use the z/VM diagnostic tools to figure out what is wrong with the
storage system. I.E. detect what volumes are present, etc.
If you can't figure out what is
On 5/8/2014 at 04:18 PM, Dno snipers5...@gmail.com wrote:
We're looking to purchase a sw product and our lawyers are looking at the t's
and c's to see if we can have the right to their source code. At my previous
job we did this for BMC, we kept it at IMAR. I guess I never understand why,
Thanks Mark, makes sense.
Dean
Sent from my iPhone
On May 8, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Mark Post mp...@suse.com wrote:
On 5/8/2014 at 04:18 PM, Dno snipers5...@gmail.com wrote:
We're looking to purchase a sw product and our lawyers are looking at the
t's
and c's to see if we can have the right
There is always Skype or some other means of telepresence :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of August Carideo/RYE/US
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 12:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: FW: z10 IPL from
The OP was the z/OS Lpar wouldn't activate after power outage with apparent
configuration issues. All the backups are DDF images. The support
structure recommends reloading the DS6800. They've been down for weeks at
this
site and is 1300 miles from mother ship.
In a message dated
http://www.cnet.com/news/ibm-no-we-did-not-help-nsa-spy-on-customers/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hi Ed,
Interesting article. If true, I applaud IBM's response.
Thanks!
BobL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM: No, we did not
Mark (et al):
Keep in mind, some ISV tools are proprietary and confidential code. If it were
not, competitors would gobble it up and duplicate the functionality, hence, the
need to keep it secure.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant
www.lcmg.us
-Original
Am I missing something here? Consider the following C statement:
unsigned long long maxBit = 0x1 (arraySize-3);
When arraySize is 66, maxBit is ending up as zero (instead of what I would
expect, X'8000'. Am I missing something?
Here is the LIST output. (No optimization.)
*
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Charles Mills
:: Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:16 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Another C compiler shift bug?
::
:: Am I missing something here? Consider the
The usual term for this is source code escrow. A third party holds the
code with a contract that says that if the vendor goes out of business or
fails in some way then you get the source code. The third party charges, and
so the vendor may charge you.
There are two or three HUGE problems with
On Thu, 8 May 2014 15:16:26 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
Am I missing something here? Consider the following C statement:
unsigned long long maxBit = 0x1 (arraySize-3);
When arraySize is 66, maxBit is ending up as zero (instead of what I would
expect, X'8000'. Am I missing
Hmmm. Well, I beat the compiler into submission but I kind of wonder if this
is correct. Perhaps. It was apparently doing 32-bit arithmetic before
because 0x1 is implicitly a 32-bit value. I changed it to 0x1ull (and
unsigned 64-bit '1') and it works.
I changed the statement to
unsigned
Yer right.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of retired mainframer
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another C compiler shift bug?
:: -Original Message-
:: From:
At one time, I broke open the UTILITY EXEC and used copies of the
commands inside it to build my own version of the utiltape. Mine started
with ICKDSF, then DDR, then the standalone FDR program. With that tape I
could initialize a volume, restore a volume (VM or MVS) and back up a
volume
On Thu, 8 May 2014 15:35:39 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
Hmmm. Well, I beat the compiler into submission ...
beat? Actually I believe you lulled it into submission.
...
SLDL r2,0(r1)
LR r0,r3
LR r1,r2
ST r1,maxBit(,r13,248)
On 5/8/2014 10:49 AM, Matthew Stitt wrote:
You do not need a remote HMC. You just need to have the local HMC available
through the Internet with remote access allowed. I do this all the time.
Could save you some time if that could happen.
How do you reach through the Internet and insert
You just have to keep IPLing to skip past the Tape Label and tape marks.
Not nice but do-able at DR. Fix it when you get back home.
/Tom Kern
On 05/08/2014 13:54, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2014 20:05:58 -0400, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
Think the key is get a working VM
Thank you Charles, this is very useful information. We discussed a couple of
the scenarios you describe, opting not to bother with this.
Dean
Sent from my iPhone
On May 8, 2014, at 6:31 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
The usual term for this is source code escrow. A third party
Well, I don't think they claim that the LIST output is valid assembler -- it's
kind of a clue, easier than reading the hex op codes.
Or how about grande instructions?
This is unoptimized. I assume they do better with OPT(2).
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
ST doesn't accept a 3-modifier expression, that is an artifact of the XL C/C++
assembler listing format.
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 7:01 PM
To:
On 5/8/2014 at 06:08 PM, Mitch mitc...@aol.com wrote:
Keep in mind, some ISV tools are proprietary and confidential code. If it
were not, competitors would gobble it up and duplicate the functionality,
hence, the need to keep it secure.
What makes you think I, or anyone else, didn't
Almost everyone I know pronounces PR/SM as PRISM.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Mark,
I am very confident you did already understand that. What I was trying to
emphasize was the open source is apples and oranges. I meant no disrespect.
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: Mark Post mp...@suse.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, May 8, 2014 4:41 pm
how does your scenario differ from hiring a new programmer and telling him
he has to support an application that has been around for years
Obviously we could invent hypothetical scenarios which were the same or
different. I think it is at least plausible that in your scenario there
would be some
Good answer. I'm not in love with IBM-MAIN by any means; I have seen
communities fragment and die due to things like this. But it's worth a try
as long as folks (on both sides!) are ready to abandon either side if
that's the way the tea leaves read down the road.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:58 AM,
Good points.
Many moons ago I wrote, as a contractor, a product for an application software
company and they ended up losing the source code for the product (which they
were selling as part of a very large application system). They were unable to
fix it for Y2K and had to replace the whole
Another anecdote: the vendor I worked for in 1988 bought a product line
from another vendor (who is gone, but was colloquially known as gruel and
garbage). It turned out that the binaries they were shipping and the
source code they sent us didn't match--not even close (major missing
function: one
Amen, brother Charles, even as a ISV I totally agree. Besides, I think we
should gave a API to Plug into, hence no need for code. Btw most auditors
don't have a clue why the want source besides they want it ...
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
On May 8, 2014, at 8:44 PM,
Mark:
I absolutely agree. And for the likes of the larger ISVs, I would guess all of
their product source code is in escrow and kept up to date. Maybe not so much
for the mom and pop software companies, but the big ones, yes.
Mitch McCluhan
-Original Message-
From: Mark Post
Sometimes it not simple, especially if you can't provide an API to makes calls
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
On May 8, 2014, at 8:40 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Also +1 what Mark said. I've known of only a few cases (not that I claim
encyclopedic knowledge, but
Charles,
First, thank you for the debate. I enjoy and appreciate your insight. Very
well stated!
Regarding the case I mentioned, it was not a licensee/user, but a competitor.
Long story, but not one I feel comfortable going into any further detail about.
Regards,
Mitch
-Original
Sounds like had a QA issue maybe
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
On May 8, 2014, at 8:54 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Another anecdote: the vendor I worked for in 1988 bought a product line
from another vendor (who is gone, but was colloquially known as gruel and
CECI seems like a good suggestion. First to proceed to the program you want to
take a dump. From this, you should be able to see where this program starts.
Now you have the base address and know the offset from your listing which gives
you the address for the slip. Set your slip and let the
We have two separate utilities that perform that function:
SyzText/z (sends one line messages to email and SMS text)
SyzMail/z (sends any number of messages to email or SMS text).
Brian
www.syzygyinc.com
--
For IBM-MAIN
93 matches
Mail list logo
