not you to accidentally overwrite storage in a system
key. You need to set the PSW key or use one of the explicit keyed
instructions.
:>Charles
:>
:>
:>-Original Message-
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:>Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
:>
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:13:23 -0700 Ed Jaffe
wrote:
:>On 6/9/2019 11:47 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:>> Well, to do that he could encapsulate this code in a PC-CP with an altered
:>> AKM.
:>Altered in what way?
ETDEF EKM=
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:23:46 -0400 Peter Relson wrote:
:>Yes there's a way -- creating a PC routine that accomplishes doing so.
:>Nothing else is acceptable, although the literal answer would be "LCTL".
Will be reset after an interrupt. (At least that was an issue in t
Key0 is much much more dangerous than supervisor state (IMHO)
:>Waiting for the real answer,
:>Rob
:>
:>On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 6:22 PM Binyamin Dissen
:>wrote:
:>
:>> On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:57:38 -0500 John McKown <
:>> john.archie.mck...@gmail.com>
:>> wrote:
can use the MVCSK and MVCDK instructions to read & update key 0, fetch
:>protected, storage without going into key 0.
:>Or am I just being silly (again)?
Why not simply run supervisor state which allows access to all keys?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen
On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 20:02:04 -0500 Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
:>On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 21:07:40 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:>
:>>On Fri, 31 May 2019 16:32:13 + willie bunter wrote:
:>>
:>>:>Would anybody have an examp
stion would be why you would want to do this.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother r
it be that the page aligned storage is less likely to be assigned at
GETMAIN time, waiting for first reference, thus guaranteeing page-fault
processing?
Try fetching/altering one byte on the page before doing the timing.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Softwar
w to pass object modules,
archives, and side decks, but not control statements. Am I missing something,
or is this just not possible?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a
an I use to find the following
:>JOBNAME/PROC Used/Date/Time/LPAR
:>Note: No SAS /no MXG
:>Only IFASMFDP or DAF
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
hat the documentation be clarified to be
:>explicit.
I wonder what kind of check box system you think should be provided to
describe what is allowed
Given task, unlocked, primary, no-XMEM - isn't anything permitted in that
environment allowed? Not advisable, but allowed.
--
Binyamin Disse
>Here is my dumb Friday question guys and gals. It is still true you can do
:>I/O , disk I/O in particular from say a RACF exit, in particular IRREVX01 ?
:>Or am i mistaken..I was thinking about somehow talking to LOGGER ...
:>
:>Scott
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoft
h exit? What unexpected result is seen?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother respond
but
:>will it handle an Operator cancel ...I know there are products, thats not
:>an option because of cost.
What about if the job abends from its own failures?
This sounds like what checkpoint/restart was made for.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen
al I assume it DFSMSdfp working with datasets
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother
x27; value within
:>the REXX itself.
:>Can anyone point me at a specific function (or whatever) that would do this?
:>Is it even possible?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expe
e
care of the BSAM bookkeeping.
REXX alone is a bad choice - but LM services use BPAM so if you have that
option
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you s
out knowing the token?
Is there a standard way to trap this? The problem cannot be reproduced at
will. Seems to only occur under TSO.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a res
e issuer cannot have an EUT FRR. What if it does?
You cannot issue any SVCs at all under SRB mode or with an EUT FRR. Or with a
lock held. Result is 0F8.
:>I'm not just trying to make trouble. I am trying to test FRR logic for
:>dealing with an unrecoverable ABEND.
--
Binyamin Diss
what is needed should
there not be access).
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 13:44:18 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>I am looking to determine storage key of an Address I am thinking baesd on
:>the Condition code set by TPROT I should be able to determine this
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftwa
w I lost a portion of my last post. The freeing on task term is by
design is not a change (we just confirmed it's true on v2.2 as well).
:>I meant to say that I agree that the documentation describing when it is
cleaned up is lacking so we'll fix the doc.
--
Binya
It gives you the opportunity
:>to see the data you're programming for.
:> The old versions of LOOK are still around on File 264, so that
:>folks using pre-z/OS systems can still have a their source codes.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Ba
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:31:16 -0500 Paul Edwards wrote:
:>On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:42:47 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
:>>Sounds like a pretty narrow range of applications, where the existing above
:>>the line is not enough, but an extra 2G will be enough forever.
:>It's so
uld also clean it
up.
:>We'll fix that.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bothe
aring the 2 GiB - 4 GiB region for GETMAIN LOC=ANY requests by an AM32
program.
:>
:>BFN. Paul.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the di
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 06:19:50 -0500 Paul Edwards wrote:
:>On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 13:55:30 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
:>>What problem would this solve?
:>It would set the long-term model for the
:>mainframe, instead of being stuck with
:>24/31-bit software for eternity.
24/
nothing.
Look at the dump. When your code causes an abend, it is quite likely that you
did something wrong.
:>Have anyone else had this or know of this issue?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks pa
itch to AM31 itself,
:>with the READ code being located below 1 GiB.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com
hed (explicitly or
automatically).
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother respon
A SHAREMEMOBJ is available to all tasks in the memory that the SHAREMEMOBJ was
done.
But when is it supposed to be automatically DETACHed?
I only find documentation of the creator of the object, not the sharers.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar
my code just maybe I have a misunderstanding it was my
understanding
:>That a wait suspends the RB not the entire TCB that documentation seems to
say otherwise the entire TCB is suspended unless I didnt read right
:>> On Apr 1, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
:>> Wha
ust the RB
is suspended
:>Which is why it is place in bits 8 - 31 of the ECB
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.
01047-00420-RE
:>1047-00420-L
:>I am not getting any reference about the status for -L and -RE
:>Where exactly I can get the explanation for tht above status.
:>Also is the above conversion valid ? If so any clue or link to make it a
:>valid conversion ?
:>Any clue or pointer are
;For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expec
gt;Please post the full Abend message(s) and all the return and reason codes as
well the register contents.
:>
:>Groete / Greetings
:>Elardus Engelbrecht
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you us
e executed only once" is
:>there an exact list of these instructions anywhere
:>
:>
:>
:>Thanks
:>
:>
:>--
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@list
--
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen S
X <---
:>0002D4 B225 0020 667+ SSAR 2
.RE
:>0002D8 982C D01C0001C 668+ LM2,12,28(13)
.RE
:>0002DC 58E0 D00CC 669+ L 14,12(,13)
.RE
:>0002E0 50F0 D17000170 670
ace entry pointed me into My program on the AXSET macro.
:>.
:>So I confused as to why the AXSET abended.
:>I suspect I did not understand all of the Presentation on
:>"Make a Service Provider to ALL" .
:>.
:>Can anyone share some light on this issue ?
--
Binyamin Diss
MF=E as long as
the flag(s) already exist.
:>
:>--
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://w
gt; 1B12D0B0 1B12D3C0 1B12C808 | ..L{..H. |
:> 1B12D0C0 1B12B498 0007 | ...q |
:> 1B12D0D0.:1B12D0DF.--All bytes contain X'00'
:>
:>I don't know how to explain this mystery, but I thin
8168K
:>V=R _6000 _0004BFFF 286720
:>SYSTEM _2000 _5FFF 16384
:>PSA _ _1FFF 8192
:>
:>
:>------
:>For IBM
ddresses I'm trying to view.)
:>Could there be something about storage keys that I'm missing? The
application does run from an APF authorized library, but AC=0.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use
can do any amount of work, provided it isn't the work he is
supposed be doing at that moment. -Robert Benchley */
:>
:>--
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@li
t I'd really
like to look at some addresses during the process.
:>Anyone have an idea what I'm doing wrong?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
xtended private area of another user?
Did you set up the RACF permissions?
Class FACILTY, BLSACTV.*
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthoriz
ogical method for stating a half-truth inaccurately
:>
:>--
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.diss
condition code.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother responding to challenge/res
It isn't obvious to me how one loads a deferred class (or which macro
instructions provide the support). Is it possible that the high-level
languages use the binder APIs to do it and there aren't any native zOS
services?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Disse
t being used .
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother responding to challenge/
seded the usefulness of SSAFF.
:>SSAFF will likely never be enhanced in any way.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com
15Clear out Low Order
:> LMH R15,R15,DBGRSEQ2
:> L R4,DBGRPC2
:> USING ESTPARAM,R2
:> OIESTFLAG,@ESTXMEM
:> DROP R2
:>PC0(R4)
:>
be / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
I guess IBM has not yet had a need to issue it from a PC-SS routine. Now I
need to roll my own (which does not seem to be complex)
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response
:>
:> TIME DSXL8
:>
:> TIMECONV DSCL16
:>
:>T
:>
:>
:>------
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acce
e on my requirement
:>Has anyone tried this similar and have a working solution ?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissenso
:>> thereof.*
:>>
:>> --
:>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
:>> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
:>>
:>> ---
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I v
I am looking at an LE dump of an 0C1 due to a branch to the middle of an
instruction. If this was a normal dump I would look at the BEA in the RTM2WA
to figure out where the bad branch was. The location of the BEA dad does not
appear obvious to me.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http
s is not in the current
CSECT but addressed by a USING.
:>We tend to use IEABRC/IEABRCX to cover macro invocations, but also do
:>change our own branches to relative branches (as pointed out, this is
:>usually a pretty quick edit) since it makes the listing cleaner.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http:
We know this was not
:>> true under z/OS 2.1, but has occurred on our z/OS 2.3 system and at a
:>> customer site recently. This has no significant consequences because
:>> all we do is issue a message. But I have not been able to find any
:>> documentation which wo
yone have a macro or a piece of code which will setup a USING
statement with 2 registers.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoft
nd PC-ss back to the
:>> > requesting address space" or any similarly sophisticated
:>> > system-level application coding technique.
:>> >
:>> > Why is system-level application coding made an obscure mystery to
:>> > which only IBM and (some) ISV
ant to examine arbitrary address spaces. Many threads on that
subject.
:>As for swappable issues my Estae can catch the s0c4 and bypass that address
space
Perhaps you may wish to think of a better way to gather the data. For program
name, perhaps an IEFUSI type exit to place it in memory.
--
ng things up so that you have authorization to SSAR to a space can
:>> have system integrity consequences.
:>> Further, if this is a reusable ASID, SSAR will not work in any case, you
:>> would need to use SSAIR.
:>>
:>> The current secondary address space can always be
's to make them work together on a
:>single-threaded task?
:>
:>Best regards
:>Kevin Neuhaus
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should pre
option on this gig.
:>Probably better not download any code either.
How does the "unwanted" steplib bother you?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response
:>4250 / DITI Engenharia de Software
:>Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
:>Tel: +55 11 3684-9602 R: 49602 3-1404
:>Fax: +55 11 3684-4427
:>
:>
:>
:>
:>-Mensagem original-
:>De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] Em nome
de Binyamin
0A13 26+ SVC 19
Issue OPEN SVC
:>
:>We have checked field DCBQSWS (bit DCBPOPEN) to detect the situation reported
above, but apparently
:>this bit is turned on only when using Parallel Data Access Blocks (PDAB),
that i
-
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
:>
:>--
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access ins
r programs that
issue IFCID 0306 requests must reside either in ECSA key 7 storage or in the
64-bit common key 7 storage area above the 2-GB bar" (from IBM book).
:> I prefer to use CICS because it's easy programming.
:>
:>
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensof
ing aside the idea
of a CICS transaction running in supervisor state)?
What is your business case?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the di
>
:>> --
:>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
:>
:>---
reallocated.
Either way, the issues remains - what will you do if the post fails?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftw
another way of saying that for XMEM The ECB is in CSA right ?
:>
:>
:>--
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftwar
int to my
:>aSXB, even when I take the offset from the chain. Any idea why? and
:>alternatively, how can I find the userid the ascb is associated with?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 13:31:16 -0500 Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
:>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:39:53 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:>>As this is part of the IPCS service, one wonders how it could determine the
:>>TOD adjustment value
It does not take care
of the leap seconds. For the above value, it returns July 1st, 2015 00:00:25
:>
:>
:>--
:>Peter Hunkeler
:>
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and e
71 '0'
:>O 2572 '09'
:>
:>//STEP0017 EXEC PGM=HAO07E,PARM='DATE=$WEDATE',
:>// COND=(3,LT)
:>//STYWRK DD DSN=PROD.HKY.WORK.HSR003B.WK1.S050,
:>// DISP=(OLD,KEEP,KEEP)
:>//SYSUDUMP D
, not using the system supplied save area (in user
key), not using key8 storage, etc.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.
gt;have RACF permission to delete that data set?
:>Similar question for /bin/tso which supports "allocation requests";
environment
:>variables containing strings eerily similar to BPXWDYN arguments. The Ref.
:>hints but doesn't directly say that /bin/tso invokes B
an authorized routine.
.
:>Im sure there is an Integrity exposure - could someone comment on the above.
Such a PC routine would be an integrity exposure.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks packa
Not true - only if you are doing an OFF for the current breakpoint.
Try my example.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:31:40 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>anytime I do an OFF subcommand all other subcommand dont execute
:>
:>
:>
:>
:>
:>> On Jul 3, 2018, at 2:46 PM, Binyamin Dis
USING *,R12
:>TPUT MESSAGE,11
:> LMR0,R15,SAVERGS
:> BRR14
:>SAVEREGS DS 16F
:>MESSAGE DC C'IN LOOK AT'
:>
:>
:>-Original Message-
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
BM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
:>Binyamin Dissen
:>Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 12:13 PM
:>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:>Subject: Re: TSO TEST breakpoint subcommand call either looping or not being
:>executed
:>
:>That has not been my experience. Doing OFF in the breakp
you thought you did.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 07:49:10 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>Binyamin
:>
:>The off for +C killed the call as the book says
:>Off for an at in the list kills the remaining
:>Subcommand
:>
:>
:>
:>> On Jul 2, 2018, at 4:31 PM, Binyamin Dissen
w
ll or execute +8 the STM
:>and then called program then go to the NSI
:>
:>Cann't figure out the syntax to make this work
:>
:>Thanks
:>
:>-Original Message-
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
:>Binyamin Dissen
:>Sent: Monday,
gt;executed
I do not understand your scenario.
You are setting a breakpoint and at the breakpoint you issue the CALL
subcommand?
What OPCODE are you breakpointing on?
What is the exact CALL command used?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill
example.
:>Any hint or pointer to a working example in assembler language would be
:>great!
Not sure of what you want, but one would think that TBSKIP NUMBER(0) or
TBQUERY would get you what you want.
Show how you would do this is REXX or some other language.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://ww
:>Did look at SLIP documentation but can not find relevant information.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com dom
>So, for example, if I have a smbold called DR whos value is DR, I would like
to write:
:>// IF &DR=DR THEN
:> Do stuff for a DR system
:>// ELSE
:> Do stuf for the production system
:>// ENDIF
:>I am running z/OS v2.1
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.co
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 07:34:36 -0700 Phil Smith wrote:
:>Binyamin Dissen wrote, in part:
:>>And for the non-Fortran programmer
:>> DO 25 I = 1,10
:>>is identical to
:>> DO25I=1,10
:>>but different than
:>> DO25I=1.10
:>For t
XREF to see if there is an "unexpected" variable.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I ver
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by
any virus transmitted by this email.
:>
:>
:>------
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to li
lers.
What do you think that BASSM would have resolved for you?
As others have indicated, BASSM would have forced AMODE24 which would
eventually fail when 31 bit storage is accessed.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should y
n't
:>be invoked from an ESTAE EXIT... but... perhaps someone here
:>knows more?
I would guess because the ESTAEX is running under an unexpected RB structure.
Perhaps it is documented as it cannot be invoked from an exit (not sure which
manual this would be described in).
--
Binyamin Diss
my disappoinment.
Now that you have established you disapprove of the first and second
amendments, which others do you have problems with? Why would you allow a high
school kids with a Nazi salute and Nazi style armbands make policy?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen
address space shares a subpool; is it the
:>responsibilty
:>of the main task to release the shared subpool, or will the OS do this when
:>the main task ends?
When a task ends, all storage "owned" by the task is freed. CSA is usually not
owned by the task, so
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 17:00:09 + Peter wrote:
:>Is there a product in Mainframe which can detect a batch failure and also
:>sends email with the possible diagnostic steps to resolve ?
I would imagine that every scheduler would have this feature.
--
Binyamin Dissen
Nope.
Look at the linkage stack entry for the POST. It has the details of the
situation and registers when the PC was issued.
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 07:45:19 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>You are referring to the SDWA right
:>
:>
:>
:>> On Mar 22, 2018, at 7:41 AM, Binya
501 - 600 of 1082 matches
Mail list logo