I have the feeling. that Antony has right, it is a CEE5101C message
and the MSS mvssigsetup call failed
In the DUMP verbx ledata 'all' should be the errno2 (or errno_jr or
errnojr etc etc) field.
I just (re)did the verbx ledata 'all' and did a find on errno. This is the only
line that has
I've seen something similar when two tasks under a parent TCB both
attempt to do a mvssigsetup(). The second one (attach) fails because an
mvssigsetup() has already been done.
To quote highlander, there can be only one! IIRC, this was two POSIX(ON)
C programs in ISPF split screens.
Just ran into this. Verify there is an OMVS UID/GID associated with the
process.
I just set a slip trap that will capture me the OMVS address space data at the
next recurrance to verify exactly that. One would think that given OMVS's
prevalence in todays systems there would be a dump option
Any chance to format the component trace
COMP(SYSOMVS) SUBNAME((SYSCAL)) ?
First dump:
ADCD113 SYSCALL 0F080001 17:09:13.929282 STANDARD SYSCALL ENTRY TRACE
ASID..0041 USERIDx STACK§20BC8048
TCB...008ADAE8
I would say:009c( errno:156 EMVSINITIAL) and errno2: 0d070200
JRPswKeyNotValid: The PSW key of the caller is not a valid key
Action: A service was requested that requires the invoker to be in the same
key that the process was dubbed under.
If we are happy about this =-O
Thanks a
IBM states that it uses an internal protocol that replaces the old SNMP
one. from the installation guide, it is clear that they use SNMP (community
name is defined on both HMC and BCPII) but it runs from the SE to the HMC
over private lan.
So, what exactly is this private protocol?
My guess
Richard,
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r11/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r11.ioea700/ioea7d0021001588.htm
After someone had pointed it out, I read it and now I know it needs to be done.
That doesn't change the fact that without TRUSTED and without explicit access,
the ZFS
Barbara, I know you're not z/OS UNIX's biggest fan, however, this time
the problem is related to the authorization to perform an MVS OPEN
against an MVS data set. UNIX is only inside the data set.
I beg to differ. The UNIX implementation has clouded itself in such a bunch of
things - nothing
The meaning of the volume serial number shown in the VOL field varies. For a
non-VSAM data set, it means the volume on which the data set resides. For a
VSAM data set, it means the volume on which the catalog containing the data
set entry resides.
I didn't know that before. It is quite
IBM Fault Analyzer support on z/OS.
Would anyone out there have obtained the ZAPs for the IEAVTABD version of the
module that came with the PTFs for OA38518?
I have searched under z/OS and under IBM Fault Analyzer and not found what is
needed.
Yes, I know I may have to open a PMR but
R0R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6
R7
7000 00FD6D40 000A
7FF6 0016 92D5 7055MVI85(7),X'D5'
7FFA 001A 91FF 7056TM 86(7),X'FF'
But then you're trusting IPCS (presumably) to format the trace entries
correctly. Something it has been known to silently get wrong, if there
is a version mismatch between IPCS and dump.
Which you're informed about in bold at the initialization of the dump for the
past 10 years.
Barbara
I have been unable to fix a problem that is driving me rather crazy (and I am
not even sure it can be fixed either via JES2 parms or SDSF parms):
Whenever I use SDSF ST or DA panel, every JOB/STC/TSU shows exactly one line of
output, both for active jobs and for terminated jobs. Specifying ? in
For me, if the output DD 's has different attributes (for example some
with OUTDESC some without ) I also got at H several lines, but if they
all the sames I got only one.
Seems to me the OUTPUT Group Number is changing in this case
Maybe for the dynalloc , they also have different
Since no one has asked yet, I will.
Is SYSTEM the appropriate level of priority for this task?
I don't have any flashcopy here, so I have no experience or even knowledge of
all that ANTMAIN does.
Regardless if you use flashcopy or not, you'll have an ANTMAIN address space
automatically
I'm guessing that the catalog display feature is dragging you down.
Uncheck that option on the 3.4 entry panel and I bet your 3.4 flies
again. If you want the catalogs, then make sure you're using VLF
caching for your catalogs.
Just went to my 1.13 system and tested this on a list of
After using Health Checker for z/OS for several months now, I'm having
doubts about some checks, so please feel free to comment :)
I just cannot resist.
But first: Have you checked the archives? Most of the checks you talk about
here I have complained about in the past. Documented in the
Hmmm, after seeing Anthony's question, I wonder if your exit is waiting for a
subsystem or console or something to complete during the IPL? But still, I
don't know what product is that exit?
Elardus, Bernard said he wrote his own exit routine for a dynamic exit defined
to the system by z/OS
I didn't see an obvious way to format the linkage stack for an SRB. Neither
SUMM FORMAT nor 2.2 did the job.
Eventually I browsed the storage using CR15.
Not sure if you're asking for this: ip cbf x str(lse) with x the linkage stack
entry address. IIRC, there are similar str(yyy) values for
I think those are arbitrary limits, for the purpose of
preventing an errant program or user from using too many
address spaces, and also for allocating the storage for
the table which is used to keep track of these address
spaces. Do you have a scenario where these limits would be
too low
gil,
Does this count address spaces started by syscall fork() when OMVS
runs under TSO?
Does syscall fork() use the CEATsoRequest API under the covers? If so, then yes.
Does it count adress spaces started by USS Rexx address TSO?
Does USS Rexx address TSO use the CEATsoRequest API under the
Even when Rexx under z/OS Unix System Services creates the
address space in order to start another instance of the TSO TMP?
And I forgot to ask the obvious question: Does this count address
spaces used to EXEC PGM=IKJEF* in batch?
gil,
please read MVS Programming: Callable Services for
Does anyone know why the number of TSO user address spaces that can be started
in any given lpar via CEA services is limited to 50? MVS Programming: Callable
Services for High-Level Languages is fairly firm in stating this:
The CEA TSO/E address space manager can create up to 10 concurrent
Thanks for your answers. I have been searching specifically for this
cross-reference out of the z/OS MVS Programming: Callable Services for
High-Level Languages book:
For information about the JSON format used for TSO/E messages, see JSON format
for TSO/E messages. For the JSON format used for
Is there a way to produce a report that will show all of the jobs
submitted by a certain task (Control-M).
I couldn't find it in SMF type 30.
Assuming that CONTROL-M has a unique STC id assigned to it via RACF class
STARTED, try RACFUSER in SMF30 (it is called RACFUSER in MXG).
Barbara
Am I the only one who misses the rationale behind the z/OS installation and
maintenance of SAS 9.2 (and now 9.3) using the Software Depot? I imagine it
would be more palatable if it was straight foward and error free. Also, has
anyone evaluated (or converted to) the World Programming System
I mentioned the AUTOIPL statement because it's easy to overlook. But yes,
guaranteed that if there are multiple SAD output volumes, they need to be
need to rebuilt using AMDSADDD because the volumes are chained together by
unit address, which AMDSADDD determines and writes out. Guess how I
Due to IBM Health checker report we have to change mode of our Coupling
facility to non Volatile.. CF is running in a partition on CPC, shared by 4
z/OS LPARs making it a sysplex. We are enabled for CICSPlex , DB2 Data
sharing, RACF Database Sharing, SMSPlex, Catalog ECS etc etc..
Gotta love that girl. Who else would have that on an AD/CD system - and know
why ?.
Thanks Shane. But no, this was not on an ADCD system - we don't have enough
DASD on the ADCD system to reserve one for sadump, much less several. Never
mind that the DASD we have are mod3 (since ADCD is
I saw Barbara's note about including the dataspaces belonging to OMVS, but
haven't seen a complete generation deck (or significant excerpt) from her
yet.
You've asked for it:
AMDSADMP IPL=D3390,VOLSER=xx, +
REUSEDS=ALWAYS,IPLEXIST=YES,
Scott,
By chance did you see any violation messages in RACF ?
None. *That* would be too easy, wouldn't it? I would not have needed to ask
what that reason code is that they already say they don't document where the
application interface is described. No mention where else to look, either.
I would like to replace the system logger cds with a smaller dataset.
Is it possible to force the use of the smaller data set?
Not dynamically, no.
You will have to format new LOGR CDSs at the desired size, change COUPLExx to
point to the new datasets and reIPL the sysplex, thus cold-starting
Sorry, I assumed you knew how to use it and didn't give the details.
I assumed the same :-(
No. I guess security isn't much of a concern for ADCD. I wouldn't have
expected UACC(READ). No clue why alter would be given to some
userids, AFAIK READ is good enough and there are no higher
Ah, you don't refresh the PROGRAM class by doing a refresh of the PROGRAM
class. You do it with
SETROPTS WHEN(PROGRAM) REFRESH
I did. That is what I meant when I said I refreshed 'PROGRAM'.
What? You wanted consistency?
yes. How strange of me. Mostly, I want to understand what I did wrong so
As has been mentioned, this module should not be in IEAVTRML. In fact
*nothing* should be in IEAVTRML. This has been true for quite a while.
I know Barbara does not like the IBM HC for z/OS, but it has a check
specifically to point out things that are in IEAVTRML since it should be
empty.
What is the DSN containing DFSMRCL0?
IMS1110.SDFSRESL or something.
RALTER PROGRAM * ADDMEM('ims-loadlib'//NOPADCHK)
I did. I also refreshed PROGRAM. Same error. Besides, that IMS library is not
anywhere in LPA or linklist. As far as I can see, the usermod that puts it into
ieavtrml does not
Lizette,
What version of IMS are you running? AFAIK DFSMRCL0 is not used by IMS
Version 9 or later.
Well, then someone should have told that to the people who deliver the ADCD
system. We are NOT running any IMS version, and that module name most probably
comes from IEAVTRML, that the ADCD
In the 1.10 ADCD RACF database there were two group profiles named VSAMDSET and
SYSCATLG. I was able to delete them in that database. With the 1.13 ADCD RACF
database, these two profiles (defined 1995) are still (again) in there, but any
attempt to delete consistently gives me:
IKJ56702I
Are you using these commands?
Thanks Frank. I must have done too many RACF commands these past days. I had
overlooked that IBMUSER was still joined. It was sufficient to remove IBMUSER
from that group, and then I could delete.
Barbara
This is WAD. You could use IRRRID00 (with a dummy SYSIN) to look out for
phantom PERMITs for those 2 groups just to make sure they're not there
anymore at all.
I know. I should have remembered that I cannot delete a group that still has
connections. As I said - I have done too much cleanup
We have 9 mod-9 page datasets that are over 50% in useMQ Broker using
most of this storage. Has anyone experienced anything like this?
I seem to remember having seen something like this. All of those pages went out
to AUX when MQ Broker was started (apparently having something to do with
I'll take a shot at bits of this:
1) What are the signs of a CPU being preempted and given to another LPAR?
Look at the logical cpu (PR, first column) in the system trace table and the
physical cp (CP, last column). When they change (assuming more than one lp and
more than one cp), it means
OTOH I'm curious about the purported risk of a 'moving device'. In order
to make a significant change to a device--especially UCB address--the
volume has to be offline or else the dynamic ACTIVATE fails.
How about a dynamic activate that succeeded but a component (catalog) that
doesn't
Not sure how Workload Manager is being used or configured at your shop.
From the original description, I am assuming that that installation runs more
than one lpar on the box, most probably with lpar weights that reflect
importance of the lpars. If the OP happens to work on an lpar that is not
Mark Zelden's IPLINFO will show you how many CADS are in use:
The current number of CADS (MAXCADs) in use is 38.
The maximum number of CADS (MAXCADs) used since IPL is 38.
Yes. But it is always infinitely easier to justify installing an 'official' IBM
product rather
If I see a HZS0003E message, a high severity exception occured.
I have an ENF listener application, it could maintain this HZQUERY
status, but maybe with the HZS messages
is simpler.
No, it's not. The HZS message id for each check can be customized in that the
severity of the check is
We are in the evaluation process for one or two
mainframe upgrades. Our current environment includes a z9EC 2094-504 with
4 prod LPARs and 1 tech support LPAR with a total of 12 LP's, so a ratio of
3:1. Some of the candidate mainframes have faster speeds but only 2 or 3
CP's. This would
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
