Re: Converting assembler to COBOL help

2022-07-10 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Hello,
There is a vendor BP that does this sort of thing with an automated tool.
Mitch

  
 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: W Mainframe <01304632a58d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sat, Jul 9, 2022 9:23 am
Subject: Re: Converting assembler to COBOL help

Hi,A suggestion... I did similar thing some years ago using z390 Macro 
Language. In summary you can create macros and replace used macros by Cobol 
statements.The macros just punch Cobol statements to an output.I converted 
about 250 critical Cobol code.Main question... Is it 100%, of course not... But 
I would say 75%.
RegardsDan


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Friday, July 8, 2022, 8:53 PM, Paul Gilmartin 
<042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 22:51:38 +, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>
>    ...  The business logic was totally scrambled, sometimes by "old-timer" 
>tricks like non-reentrant branch gates and other such no-no's under current 
>maintainability and pipeline-flush avoidance rules, other times just by 
>flagrantly awful spaghetti code even a human would struggle to understand.
> 
Was that merely faithfully replicating deficiencies in the input?

What architecture level?

What might it do with such as RISBG?

-- 
gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...

2022-01-19 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Carmen?
Print operator?  Back in the 70s, we did it all!  

Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Carmen Vitullo 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Jan 19, 2022 1:50 pm
Subject: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...

NO - fun was being a print operator and throwing an empty box of 
stock paper at someone who thought it was a full box

what not to do when you're an operator working with Datagraphix 
microfiche, save the chemical change for the next shift, it always comes 
back to bite you


Carmen

On 1/19/2022 1:44 PM, Mitch Mccluhan wrote:
>  ...the most fun was when you had a punch card system where a co-worker was 
>sorting a few columns of approximately 25K cards and asked you to help carry a 
>stack. When they weren't looking, you pick up a stack of garbage cards 
>instead, take a few steps and "accidentally" drop the stack.  So much fun!  Of 
>course, this was before true operating systems.
>
> Mitch McCluhan
>  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: Seymour J Metz
> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Wed, Jan 19, 2022 1:39 pm
> Subject: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
>
> I've heard of operators cancelling jobs that were running correctly because 
> they assumed that tapes moving back and forth always meant a bad spot.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> 
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
> Carmen Vitullo [cvitu...@hughes.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:27 PM
> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
>
> not a zseries, around the same decade, in the 80's we had a 30xx
> processor that went into a wait state IIRC, I was an operator and we
> were rerunning an inventory update process for a large retailer, I
> started to hit stop/unload all the inventory files that were mounted on
> the drives, supervisor and sysprogs were at the console and I got heat
> for doing it since then an O2 SYSTEM RESTART (I think) was new and my
> boss throught we could just restart the processor and pick up like the
> system never went into a wait state, luckily for me, the system did not
> recover and an IPL was required.
>
> other things like attempting to run a compile/go my first assembler
> program (as an operator) the system seemingly hung, it was not me
> thankfully but I still had a pucker up moment.
>
> I recall my lead operator doing something similar on a data check on a
> tape, you know when you see the tape re-read the same block over and
> over, he hit stop on the processor, it was a 370/158, then accessed the
> control unit for the drives and threw some toggles to bypass the bad
> block on the tape, resumed and all was good, our applications were
> written i a way that bad data was written to an error report so we could
> balance the data and account for the missing input -
>
>
> Carmen
>
>
> On 1/19/2022 12:04 PM, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
>> At my first job (1975) one of the programmers was chatting to the operators 
>> and then lent against that red button on the wall. Shutdown the entire 
>> machine room of course.
>>
>> Lennie
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List   On Behalf Of 
>> Mike Shaw
>> Sent: 19 January 2022 16:44
>> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
>>
>> We once had a data check we could not get past on a 3420 tape. This was 
>> around 1980, MVS/SE 1 or thereabouts. The lead sysprog hit stop on the tape 
>> drive, pulled the leading tape portion out of the vacuum column, rubbed it 
>> gently back and forth between his finger and thumb, and slowly released the 
>> tape back into the vacuum column. He hit start on the tape drive and we got 
>> past the data check and read the rest of the data on that tape without a 
>> problem. No blocks were missed.
>>
>> I thought that was magic at the time...
>>
>> Mike Shaw
>> MVS/QuickRef Support Group
>> Chicago-Soft, Ltd.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:31 AM Seymour J Metz   wrote:
>>
>>> Back in the old days the R/W heads lifted up when you unloaded  a tape
>>> and moved down when you mounted a new reel. One day an interlock
>>> didn't interlock and the R/W head mashed the hand of an operator. The
>>> damage wasn't permanent, but everybody was more cautious after that.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>>
>>> 
>>> From: 

Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...

2022-01-19 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...the most fun was when you had a punch card system where a co-worker was 
sorting a few columns of approximately 25K cards and asked you to help carry a 
stack. When they weren't looking, you pick up a stack of garbage cards instead, 
take a few steps and "accidentally" drop the stack.  So much fun!  Of course, 
this was before true operating systems.

Mitch McCluhan
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Seymour J Metz 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Jan 19, 2022 1:39 pm
Subject: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...

I've heard of operators cancelling jobs that were running correctly because 
they assumed that tapes moving back and forth always meant a bad spot.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Carmen Vitullo [cvitu...@hughes.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...

not a zseries, around the same decade, in the 80's we had a 30xx
processor that went into a wait state IIRC, I was an operator and we
were rerunning an inventory update process for a large retailer, I
started to hit stop/unload all the inventory files that were mounted on
the drives, supervisor and sysprogs were at the console and I got heat
for doing it since then an O2 SYSTEM RESTART (I think) was new and my
boss throught we could just restart the processor and pick up like the
system never went into a wait state, luckily for me, the system did not
recover and an IPL was required.

other things like attempting to run a compile/go my first assembler
program (as an operator) the system seemingly hung, it was not me
thankfully but I still had a pucker up moment.

I recall my lead operator doing something similar on a data check on a
tape, you know when you see the tape re-read the same block over and
over, he hit stop on the processor, it was a 370/158, then accessed the
control unit for the drives and threw some toggles to bypass the bad
block on the tape, resumed and all was good, our applications were
written i a way that bad data was written to an error report so we could
balance the data and account for the missing input -


Carmen


On 1/19/2022 12:04 PM, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
> At my first job (1975) one of the programmers was chatting to the operators 
> and then lent against that red button on the wall. Shutdown the entire 
> machine room of course.
>
> Lennie
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
> Mike Shaw
> Sent: 19 January 2022 16:44
> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
>
> We once had a data check we could not get past on a 3420 tape. This was 
> around 1980, MVS/SE 1 or thereabouts. The lead sysprog hit stop on the tape 
> drive, pulled the leading tape portion out of the vacuum column, rubbed it 
> gently back and forth between his finger and thumb, and slowly released the 
> tape back into the vacuum column. He hit start on the tape drive and we got 
> past the data check and read the rest of the data on that tape without a 
> problem. No blocks were missed.
>
> I thought that was magic at the time...
>
> Mike Shaw
> MVS/QuickRef Support Group
> Chicago-Soft, Ltd.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:31 AM Seymour J Metz  wrote:
>
>> Back in the old days the R/W heads lifted up when you unloaded  a tape
>> and moved down when you mounted a new reel. One day an interlock
>> didn't interlock and the R/W head mashed the hand of an operator. The
>> damage wasn't permanent, but everybody was more cautious after that.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>
>> 
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on
>> behalf of Cameron Conacher
>> [03cfc59146bb-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 10:22 AM
>> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
>>
>> A very long time ago, (mid seventies I think) I was loading a tape to
>> a tape drive.
>> A button on my jean jacket trapped the edge of my jacket sleeve inside
>> the tape drive when as the glass closed.
>> I stood patiently and waited for the tape processing to complete so
>> the tape could unload.
>>
>> After that, I paid more attention when loading tapes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ...Cameron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On
>> Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 9:41 AM
>> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: [

Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-13 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...and IBM has multiple zCloud sites.  I've toured the one in Boulder, and it 
is amazing.
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Bfishing 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Dec 13, 2021 11:19 am
Subject: Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.

IBM does offer this cloud service:
https://www.ibm.com/cloud/hyper-protect-virtual-servers

Only providing a reply to the question of zCloud offerings from IBM.


On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 9:51 PM Ed Jaffe 
wrote:

> On 12/11/2021 11:07 AM, zMan wrote:
> > What Z cloud offering? I see them categorizing CICS revenue as "cloud".
> Not
> > aware of a real Z cloud offering?
>
> According to LinkedIn, IBM's Scott Engleman, who did an amazing job for
> years as z/OS Offering Manager, is now the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud Product
> Management Leader".
>
> I believe the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud" offering to be the full name of what
> some folks refer to as "Z Cloud"...
>
> --
> Phoenix Software International
> Edward E. Jaffe
> 831 Parkview Drive North
> El Segundo, CA 90245
> https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
>
>
>
> 
> This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the
> information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise
> received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution,
> review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information
> contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended
> recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
> of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email
> message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this
> email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be
> free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system
> into
> which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient
> to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the
> sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 

><º>`·.¸¸´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸>(((º>
.·´¯`·.><º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><º>

<>< Go fishing ><>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Mainframe Modernization

2021-10-20 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 David,
I have been in mainframes since 1970 and started my own company in 1998 dealing 
with mainframe modernization.  A lot has to do with languages, databases and 
interfaces to non-mainframe environments along with the zCloud capabilities 
currently available.  While I am a 1,000% proponent of mainframe environments, 
I do see where some smaller applications make it possible to have more readily 
support and services by moving off the mainframe.  Almost without question, one 
of the issues is the aging of mainframe staff.  But on the flip side, 
converting to a more "modern" language, migrating from a non-relational DBMS to 
DB2 and improving the containerization of mainframe applications vastly 
improves the ability to interface to other environments, support, access to 
adequate staff and all the IBM and 3rd party tools that also improve the 
longevity of the applications.  Lastly, modernization can also involve the 
replacement of tools and utilities that don't perform adequately, are too 
costly or are not kept up to date to match the capabilities of the current zOS 
systems.

All I do with my current employer is analyzing mainframes for modernization 
opportunities.  Very, VERY few mainframe shops want to lose their mainframe.  
And, all the mainframe TBTF environments can't move to a non-mainframe 
infrastructure just because they are so large.      

Just my thoughts
Mitch                                     
 
 
-Original Message-
From: David Elliot 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Oct 20, 2021 6:50 pm
Subject: Mainframe Modernization

Does anyone out there know what is meant by the expression "Mainframe
Modernization' '? It seems  to be catching on with the Bobs but when you
ask exactly how they propose to modernize their systems all you get is
silence. As in if you don"know we shouldn't even be talking about it.
Any ideas ? Or is it just more BS like 'cloud' or 'devops'?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IBM JCL Expert preview in today's announcement letter

2021-10-08 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
Domenic,
Tell me more, please.
Mitch


Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS


On Friday, October 8, 2021, 8:05 AM, Domenico D'Alterio 
 wrote:

Hello List,
I see that the IBM announcement 
https://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/3/649/ENUSA21-0533/index.html=en_locale=en
 triggered a lot of questions.
I am the Senior Product Manager in IBM working on this new project, so it will 
be a completely new offering from IBM for a JCL Checker tool.
If you are interested in talking with development during the development phase, 
reach-out me. It would not be a sales call, just an early exposure of what we 
plan to deliver with the possibility to influence the roadmap.

Thank you,
Domenico D'Alterio

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Control-M

2021-09-22 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 I would suggest IWS from IBM.  It is a true enterprise wide solution.  I have 
been in the scheduler, production control, operations, etc areas for many 
decades and it is, in my opinion, a better option.
And in openness, I am with IBM, but this is my personal opinion.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Mike S 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Sep 22, 2021 3:06 pm
Subject: Control-M

Anyone on here ever used Control-M from BMC? Any comments on the 
Installation/Maintenance/Performance ...ET AL? Any additional products that had 
to be purchased because Control-M didn't have everything it needed to run 
successfully?




==
This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you 
have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: even an old mainframer can do it

2021-08-18 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Tony,
Excellent retort!  I agree.  Why make something simple and so many people 
understand into something that is complex and black box-ish.
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Tony Thigpen 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Aug 18, 2021 7:52 am
Subject: Re: even an old mainframer can do it

The problem is that he approached his objective from the wrong direction.

It appears that is objective was to 'avoid changing the JCL for 
different control cards'.

We do write some of these type programs for queries that end-users need 
to submit. Maybe TSO based on CICS based. But, we normally just prompt 
for the data card parms and then submit a modified JCL member to JES.

Sometimes, we programmers need the same sort of process and because we 
just need to do something all the time and are lasy. Thus TSO panel for 
submitting compiles.

But, we normally just use a front-end to make a minor change to the JCL 
before it is submitted.

This guy, who claims he is a "Seasoned mainframer guy" (and I will 
ignore the fact that it's either "mainframe guy" or "mainframer" without 
the "guy") apparently decided that the JCL was 'evil'. That is what I 
don't understand. He took something that any basic programmer/operator 
(mostly) understands and replaced it with something that few in the 
field would understand.

It seems very Rube Goldberg to me. And, I agree, it seems 'woke' to me 
too (as in 'JCL' is now the new evil').

Tony Thigpen

kekronbekron wrote on 8/17/21 11:59 PM:
> Objectively, this has got to be madness.
> Just look at the JCL that's being shoved into a horrid, horrid Python program.
> ~200 lines to replace 18 lines of JCL.
> 
> Oh.. and that's leaving aside the condescending tone about 'the old 
> mainframer'.
> Whether a person wants to learn something or not (therefore choosing their 
> path) is up to them.
> They don't need to be harassed/shamed about it.
> Just because there were some people on mainframe forums consistently 
> harassing everyone with "check with your site's system programmer / RTFM / 
> etc.", it doesn't mean the woke folk need to return the favour by being 
> passive aggressive or insulting senior sysprogs for not wearing neon shorts 
> or whatever.
> 
> If this is being paraded as simplification, now the mainframe is truly doomed.
> 
> https://medium.com/theropod/the-journey-from-jcl-to-python-so-easy-even-an-old-mainframer-can-do-it-f088cc49366a
> 
> - KB
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Static CEEPCALL to COBOL 5/6

2021-08-17 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Frank,
...being with IBM, I have some contacts that sometimes help me out.  I passed 
your question along to our COBOL compiler lab and they think you may have 
encountered a shortcoming in COBOL 6.3.  They recommended that you should call 
IBM support and open a case.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Frank Swarbrick 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Aug 16, 2021 2:46 pm
Subject: Static CEEPCALL to COBOL 5/6

I have a very simple LE-enabled assembler program:
        SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2              
CALLER  CEEENTRY MAIN=YES,RMODE=ANY      
        CEEPCALL COBTEST,MF=(E,)        
        CEETERM                          
PPA      CEEPPA  ,                      
        CEEDSA  ,                      
        CEECAA  ,                      
        END      CALLER                  

This works under the following conditions:
- COBTEST is a COBOL V6.3 DLL and is "DLL linked" with CALLER.
- COBTEST is a COBOL V4.2 non-DLL and is static linked with CALLER.

However, if COBTEST is a COBOL V6.3 non-DLL and is static linked with CALLER, 
it abends with an S0C1.
It appears that when a COBOL V6.3 program is static linked with an LE-assembler 
main program it's wiping our or not properly setting CEECAACRENT, the address 
of the writable static area.

Specifically, the CEEPCALL macro expansion has the following statement:
L    15,500(,12)                    LOAD 15 WITH CEECAACRENT  
When working properly, this loads R15 with a valid address.  But in the not 
working scenario it's loading address 0.

Should this be working?  Is this a bug?  Am I doing something wrong?

Thanks,
Frank

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: TWS replacements

2021-07-10 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
….go with IWS.
Mitch


Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS


On Saturday, July 10, 2021, 11:35 AM, IBM user  wrote:

STONEBRANCH
Does anyone have anything to say about Stonebranch?

- Original message -
From: Radoslaw Skorupka <0368479ca34d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TWS replacements
Date: Sunday, January 24, 2021 3:42 PM

To complement: there are several products from several companies.
BMC ControlM
CA ESP (now Broadcom)
CA-7
IBM IWS aka TWS aka OPC
ASG-ZEKE
former BETA 42
Tidal Workload Automation
schedule-in
OPS/Jobmaster
ActiveBatch
JAMS Scheduler
Stonebranch
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Mainframe t-shirt store

2021-05-13 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...it gets to the point to checkout/pay, and it freezes.  Must not be running 
on a mainframe!!
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: PINION, RICHARD W. 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, May 13, 2021 12:58 pm
Subject: Mainframe t-shirt store

If you haven't seen this, then check it out.

www.mainframestore.com
Confidentiality notice: 
This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged 
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or 
the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or 
copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this 
e-mail message from your computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: JCL checkers?

2021-03-12 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Folks,
As an FYI, J-MAN makes it possible to work on a "reference model",  from which 
the tool automatically creates as many target environments as you need, based 
on "rules" that describe how to modify the jobs to make them effective for the 
specific target environments. Every single keyword of the job, every file name, 
every parameter can be automatically changed, including the structure itself of 
the job can be changed.
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Holst <02366bf64af9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Mar 12, 2021 6:45 am
Subject: Re: JCL checkers?

Like several others we use JCLCHECK from Broadcom/CA. We were using JCLSCAN, 
but we had a new requirement that we be able to check JCL intended to run on a 
different sysplex. (We create our production JCL on a test sysplex.) JCLCHECK 
has a feature that does this.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: JCL checkers?

2021-03-11 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...I think CA/Broadcom calls that a Unicenter license.  When I was supporting 
competitive products, the CA sales person said that is only one of the tools, 
so no reduction was possible.  Used to frustrate my clients at the time!
What is nice about today's market is that there is also an automated 
tools-based solution for migration away from the CA schedulers.

Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 2:18 pm
Subject: Re: JCL checkers?

Correct. At a former employer, we kept eliminating CA products only to see the 
CA billing barely move. Until we eliminated every CA product. Top Secret being 
the last. (RACF replaced it)


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Thursday, March 11, 2021, 3:14 PM, Gibney, Dave  wrote:



> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On
> Behalf Of Pommier, Rex
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:39 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: JCL checkers?
> 
> Ron,
> 
s as well as not
> lowering the price if the customer drops a product from their portfolio.
> 
This behavior is not new with the Broadcom acquisition of CA 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

2021-03-11 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Seymour,
I would say J-Man is VERY competitive in price but also likely able to provide 
significantly more bang for the buck.  

Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Seymour J Metz 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 2:03 pm
Subject: Re: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

The question isn't whether the product is perfect. The questions are:
    Is it worth what we pay for it?
    Does a competitive product offer more bang for the buck
    in our environment?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Mitch Mccluhan [005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 2:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

 ...true, very slick, until you submit the JCL for execution and find out that 
the job before it deleted an input dataset, or that the JCL called a control 
card member that was empty, or that the program to be executed in step 3 wasn't 
compiled properly so the job abends.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

2021-03-11 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Actually, I am fairly confident that J-Man would catch if not 100% of JCL 
issues (not just JCL errors), but very, VERY close.  I can say this because I 
have used the product in the past and was in the JCL management tool provider 
environment for almost 15 years, so very familiar with the JCL tools on the 
market.
Again though, it is, in the end, a matter of personal preference.
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Pommier, Rex 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 1:42 pm
Subject: Re: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

Mitch, 

Also true, but still nice to catch the typo'd program name that would have 
caused an 806 or the missing PDS member or any of the other pile of things a 
TYPRUN=SCAN doesn't catch.  They can't catch everything but ours definitely 
took care of a lot of potential problems before they happened, just by hitting 
a PFKey.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Mitch Mccluhan
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 1:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

 ...true, very slick, until you submit the JCL for execution and find out that 
the job before it deleted an input dataset, or that the JCL called a control 
card member that was empty, or that the program to be executed in step 3 wasn't 
compiled properly so the job abends.  

Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Pommier, Rex 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 1:34 pm
Subject: Re: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

Chris,

It must have just been put into place.  Back in the late 80s, early 90s when I 
installed JCLCheck I activated that function.  In ISPF edit hit a PFKey and it 
ran the check, popping JCL errors etc. right in the edit session.  I agree, 
very slick.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Chris Hoelscher
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 1:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

We use JCLCHECK - either a new feature was introduced in 2020, or an existing 
feature was put in play at our site - it allows JCLCHECK to be invoked from a 
TSO edit session - VERY NICE The batch version also allows jcl to be checked 
for customizable requirements to allow things are just the way we want them for 
our production repository - helps when building an xref

Chris Hoelscher
Lead Sys DBA
IBM Global Technical Services on assignmemt to Humana Inc.
T 502.476.2538  or 502.407.7266

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] JCL checkers?

[External Email: Use caution with links and attachments]


What JCL checkers are normally available?
TYPRUN=SCAN requires actual submission of the job. I want to check syntax and 
datasets thanks Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this 
material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy 
the material/information.

Humana Inc. and its subsidiaries comply with applicable Federal civil rights 
laws and do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, 
ancestry, age, disability, sex, marital status, gender, sexual orientation, 
gender identity, or religion. Humana Inc. and its subsidiaries do not exclude 
people or treat them differently because of race, color, national origin, 
ancestry, age, disability, sex, marital status, gender, sexual orientation, 
gender identity, or religion.

English: ATTENTION: If you do not speak English, language assistance services, 
free of charge, are available to you. Call 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

Español (Spanish): ATENCIÓN: Si habla español, tiene a su disposición servicios 
gratuitos de asistencia lingüística. Llame al 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

繁體中文(Chinese):注意:如果您使用繁體中文,您可以免費獲得語言援助
服務。請致電 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711)。

Kreyòl Ayisyen (Haitian Creole): ATANSION: Si w pale Kreyòl Ayisyen, gen sèvis 
èd pou lang ki disponib gratis pou ou. Rele 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

Polski (Polish): UWAGA: Jeżeli mówisz po polsku, możesz skorzystać z bezpłatnej 
pomocy językowej. Zadzwoń pod numer 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

한국어 (Korean): 주의: 한국어를 사용하시는 경우, 언어 지원 서비스를 무료로 이용하실 수 있습니다. 1‐877‐320‐1235 
(TTY: 711)번으로 전화해 주십시오.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message

Re: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

2021-03-11 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...true, very slick, until you submit the JCL for execution and find out that 
the job before it deleted an input dataset, or that the JCL called a control 
card member that was empty, or that the program to be executed in step 3 wasn't 
compiled properly so the job abends.  

Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Pommier, Rex 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 1:34 pm
Subject: Re: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

Chris,

It must have just been put into place.  Back in the late 80s, early 90s when I 
installed JCLCheck I activated that function.  In ISPF edit hit a PFKey and it 
ran the check, popping JCL errors etc. right in the edit session.  I agree, 
very slick.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Chris Hoelscher
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 1:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

We use JCLCHECK - either a new feature was introduced in 2020, or an existing 
feature was put in play at our site - it allows JCLCHECK to be invoked from a 
TSO edit session - VERY NICE The batch version also allows jcl to be checked 
for customizable requirements to allow things are just the way we want them for 
our production repository - helps when building an xref

Chris Hoelscher
Lead Sys DBA
IBM Global Technical Services on assignmemt to Humana Inc.
T 502.476.2538  or 502.407.7266

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] JCL checkers?

[External Email: Use caution with links and attachments]


What JCL checkers are normally available?
TYPRUN=SCAN requires actual submission of the job. I want to check syntax and 
datasets thanks Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this 
material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy 
the material/information.

Humana Inc. and its subsidiaries comply with applicable Federal civil rights 
laws and do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, 
ancestry, age, disability, sex, marital status, gender, sexual orientation, 
gender identity, or religion. Humana Inc. and its subsidiaries do not exclude 
people or treat them differently because of race, color, national origin, 
ancestry, age, disability, sex, marital status, gender, sexual orientation, 
gender identity, or religion.

English: ATTENTION: If you do not speak English, language assistance services, 
free of charge, are available to you. Call 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

Español (Spanish): ATENCIÓN: Si habla español, tiene a su disposición servicios 
gratuitos de asistencia lingüística. Llame al 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

繁體中文(Chinese):注意:如果您使用繁體中文,您可以免費獲得語言援助
服務。請致電 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711)。

Kreyòl Ayisyen (Haitian Creole): ATANSION: Si w pale Kreyòl Ayisyen, gen sèvis 
èd pou lang ki disponib gratis pou ou. Rele 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

Polski (Polish): UWAGA: Jeżeli mówisz po polsku, możesz skorzystać z bezpłatnej 
pomocy językowej. Zadzwoń pod numer 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

한국어 (Korean): 주의: 한국어를 사용하시는 경우, 언어 지원 서비스를 무료로 이용하실 수 있습니다. 1‐877‐320‐1235 
(TTY: 711)번으로 전화해 주십시오.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [External] JCL checkers?

2021-03-11 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ASG bought JCLPrep from Altare Computer Systems some time ago.  The original 
developers are long gone.  At one time, it was one of the best because it was 
the first to allow modification of the JCL from an ISPF screen.  It was 
out-selling most of the JCL tools in the 80s, but now is just one of the 
wanna-bes.  

Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Charles Mills 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 1:30 pm
Subject: Re: [External] JCL checkers?

ASG has one. JCL-Prep?

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 10:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] JCL checkers?

I haven't used any of these except the CA one over 20 years ago...  In no 
particular order.

ISC Software JCL checker
CA-JCLCheck
SEA JCLPlus
JCLPrep (IDK who markets this one)
Used to be something called smartJCL
Used to be something called Jscan
PRO/JCL

Just to name a few.  

Rex





-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 12:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] JCL checkers?

What JCL checkers are normally available?
TYPRUN=SCAN requires actual submission of the job. I want to check syntax and 
datasets thanks Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: JCL checkers?

2021-03-11 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Having the ability to check the JCL is important, but even more so is the 
ability to ensure the JCL is accurate, efficient, well coded and documented and 
has the ability to interface with change management tools (i.e., Endevor, 
ChangeMan, etc),batch schedulers and rerun/restart requirements. In addition, 
the ability to not only format the JCL for appearance and requirements/ or 
prevention of any and all JCL and site specific requirements, automatically, 
will easily reduce effort, cost, performance and maintenance overhead.
I have been in the JCL management arena since the early 80s, when JCLCHECK was 
the king.  A lot has changed since then!
Mitch  
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Pommier, Rex 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 12:58 pm
Subject: Re: JCL checkers?

Has anybody heard whether Broadcom will be raising the price of JCLCheck?  I 
used it many years ago and liked it but haven't had access to a commercial JCL 
checker in well over 20 years.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
McCabe, Ron
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 12:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: JCL checkers?

We use JCL Check from CA.

Thanks,
Ron McCabe
Manager of Mainframe/Midrange Systems
Mutual of Enumclaw

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Johnson
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 10:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JCL checkers?

CAUTION: This email is from an external address. Please be careful of links and 
attachments.


JCLPREP worked well for us. ASG product.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Thursday, March 11, 2021, 1:32 PM, Bill Giannelli  
wrote:

What JCL checkers are normally available?
TYPRUN=SCAN requires actual submission of the job. I want to check syntax and 
datasets thanks Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Confidentiality 
Notice: This e- mail and all attachments may contain CONFIDENTIAL information 
and are meant solely for the intended recipient. It may contain controlled, 
privileged, or proprietary information that is protected under applicable law 
and shall not be disclosed to any unauthorized third party. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, 
action, disclosure, distribution, or reproduction of any information contained 
in this e- mail and any attachments is strictly PROHIBITED. If you received 
this e- mail in error, please reply to the sender immediately stating that this 
transmission was misdirected, and delete or destroy all electronic and paper 
copies of this e-mail and attachments without disclosing the contents. This e- 
mail does not grant or assign rights of ownership in the proprietary subject 
matter herein, nor shall it be construed as a joint venture, partnership, 
teaming agreement, or any other formal business relationship.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: JCL checkers?

2021-03-11 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...I supported JCLPREP for years.  It is a good tool, but also old school.  I 
suggest J-Man from RES (https://res-group.eu/en/download/j-man).  It is head 
and shoulders above all other JCL management tools.  It performs on all the 
latest zSeries platforms, interfaces with virtually all the IBM and 3rd party 
batch schedulers, and includes the ability to automatically modify JCL to meet 
site standards, naming conventions, scheduler requirements and a lot more.
Regards,
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 12:42 pm
Subject: Re: JCL checkers?

JCLPREP worked well for us. ASG product.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Thursday, March 11, 2021, 1:32 PM, Bill Giannelli  
wrote:

What JCL checkers are normally available?
TYPRUN=SCAN requires actual submission of the job. I want to check syntax and 
datasets
thanks
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: TWS replacements

2021-01-24 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...in all fairness, TWS (initially OPC, now IWS), provides all the support and 
solutioning as mentioned by Mark in his email.  One of the major benefits of 
IWS (and this is just one of many) is that being an IBM product, it has the 
most prolific set of interfaces to the zOS environment including IBM 
tools/utilities and virtually all other environmentss that have some 
interaction with the batch environment.  This also applies to 3rd party vendor 
tools that have some impact on JCL and/or scheduling.  Lastly, IBM has an 
active process that can automatically (using tools) convert non-IWS schedulers 
to IWS.
I have been in the JCL and scheduler environment since 1982 and have supported 
(in either technical pre-sales, actual use of, or conversion projects specific 
to scheduling software) and believe that IWS is the product leader in automated 
scheduling.
Disclaimer, I used to work at ASG and am currently with IBM.
Regards,
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jacobs <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2021 10:32 am
Subject: Re: TWS replacements

ASG-Zeke is an automated job scheduler that dynamically schedules and 
dispatches events, and monitors every aspect of your job schedule.

ASG-Zeke provides wide ranging functionality, including system command 
scheduling, automatic variable calculation and substitution, step-level 
condition code validation, workload balancing, schedule forecasting and 
simulation, SAF security, optional SMP/E support, simultaneous support for 
multiple JCL libraries, electronic vaulting capabilities, pre-built calendars, 
and other utilities. When you add ASG’s cross-platform agent(s), scheduling is 
extended to all the major platforms, including Windows, Linux, UNIX, OS/400.

Disclaimer. I work for ASG Technologies.

Mark Jacobs

Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.

GPG Public Key - 
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Saturday, January 23rd, 2021 at 11:14 AM, IBM user  wrote:

> What are some of the less-expensive IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler TWS (IWS) 
> replacements that are available?
>
> Solution needs to manage mainframe and remote Windows/Linux workloads.
>
> IBM User
>
> ---
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: CA Broadcom Replacement Software

2020-12-10 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Hello,
In regards to automated scheduler replacements, I am aware of a company that 
does conversion/migration from a variety of scheduling software (CA-7, 
CA-Scheduler, Control-M, etc.) to the IBM IWS tool suite (formerly OPC or TWS). 
 It is an automated conversion/migration that has been performed at a number of 
mainframe sites around the globe.

Mitch McCluhan
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Patti Bowman 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Dec 9, 2020 4:28 pm
Subject: FW: CA Broadcom Replacement Software

Hi:

UNICOM/Macro 4 have a Session Manager to replace CA Broadcom'sTPX with a
product called Tubes.  Please see the link below:

https://www.macro4.com/products/tubes-zos/

Thank you,
Patti





-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 2:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA Broadcom Replacement Software

I forgot to mention that they are all orderable on a ServerPAC and, at a
minimum, sub-capacity eligible.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 2:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA Broadcom Replacement Software

I think SuperSession for CA-TPX
IBM's RMM for CA1
As for CA Workload Automation - There should be requirements to determine
how to replace it

IBM has a Tivoli Scheduler (I forget the name) But there are probably other
companies.

I would guess a Cost analysis should be done to see what makes sense.

So CA Worklaod Automation is the top of the line, but CA also has Jobtrac

Check out http://www.syzygyinc.com/ as well

It will come down to what do you need vs. what is available on the mark.

Lizette



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 12:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA Broadcom Replacement Software

I'm going to *slightly* disagree with the multi windows instead of a session
manager.  Session manager gets closer to a single signon because it can mask
signing on to everything.  It also typically has a longer timeout and can
seemingly withstand a network drop.  I'm currently experiencing multiple WAN
drops to work daily.  My TN3270 sessions lose connectivity when the network
drops so once the network is back I have to disconnect/reconnect my TN3270
connections but our session manager just drops me right back where I was.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 1:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: CA Broadcom Replacement Software

DFRMM for CA-1
Multiple tn3270 windows instead of any session manager

> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On
> Behalf Of Elaine Beal
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2020 11:07 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: CA Broadcom Replacement Software
>
> Any recommendations for CA1, CA Workload Automation (JSS/ESP), TPX
> session manager replacements?
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action
omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety,
whether in electronic or hard copy format.  Thank you.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

-- 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by Google Message Security 
and the UNICOM Global security systems. This message is for the n

Re: JCL examination prior to execution

2020-09-22 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 just a thought.  Run the JCL through J-Man and either change the 
statements, one of the values/parameters or issue a flag prior to the execution.
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jacobs <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tue, Sep 22, 2020 8:35 am
Subject: Re: JCL examination prior to execution

We've had developers fill up spool with unnecessary dumps in the past. Yes, 
you're correct, they can do as you said, but they don't. It's pure user error.

Mark Jacobs

Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.

GPG Public Key - 
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 9:29 AM, Seymour J Metz  wrote:

> Why? My understanding is that you can retrieve an SVC dump from SPOOL and 
> process it in IPCS. As long as it is in a hold class, what problems does it 
> cause?
>
>
> --
>
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU on behalf of 
> Mark Jacobs 0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 8:11 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: JCL examination prior to execution
>
> We have developers who put SYSMDUMP output to SYSOUT rather than a dataset. 
> I'm looking at ways to prevent those jobs from executing until they make JCL 
> changes. Are there any other exits, processes other than a JES2 exit (looking 
> at exit 6/60) to do so?
>
> Mark Jacobs
>
> Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
>
> GPG Public Key - 
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1gV3QlDEC4whhAOpxGDqlWhtt9-Vum1-s6zU_qe0Q1Q3aPU1FE-A90GeTPpz8jKMhzcZVcfg6b6k5_7EC3d3RcoB3IEi6T0Znq9kwpDNzuoNXOFZy44tM4Lu7OcfqHR66zi9MQdIlEyX18kKI1-uyZrD1tQfcoLhPP0vvD2fG4Az6VK8S5R4449KcpF93hlyFnGO29LfHJWgTQUgwGOmsAwq5HlKn07Fugxsjgnv4dg-XtmWUi0Exd3Pt_p6cfHqmS8_GCvni0WjqRy07gZnTOMCLLVCAV8rTILJ8vtI2JEVZpf7fI3oPe2IP4BYs5pLmzCN6W1nR-27mgDwuZTDw_lMAT-WvQarzSxkU-0L75vCJNbRwEoNOVCHsX_y6FqWNwHDwIxCE2cUcMKYLjwrh1TDYQfEGK83ZQmF7emCkNwQxJTgbVBGIGNYaBrT2EsMk/https%3A%2F%2Fapi.protonmail.ch%2Fpks%2Flookup%3Fop%3Dget%26search%3Dmarkjacobs%40protonmail.com
>
> --
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ---
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z13s to z15 Mainframe

2020-08-17 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Hello,
We have been involved in a number of these
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Charles MacNiven <0325e5af57fe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Aug 17, 2020 8:28 am
Subject: z13s to z15 Mainframe

Hi,
anyone aware of a migration path from z13s to z15 (T01 or T02).

Many thanks,
Charles.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes"

2020-06-09 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Hmmm, let me see if I remember.  Oh yeah, what used to be called a remote data 
center!
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: ITschak Mugzach 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tue, Jun 9, 2020 8:14 am
Subject: Re: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes"

John McKown, you are not alone!

ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring
for z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM comming son  *




On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:08 PM Ron Wells <
02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> BINGO
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf
> Of Ward Able, Grant
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2020 7:56 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes"
>
> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
>
>
> There's no such thing as The Cloud - it's just someone else's
> computer...
>
>
> Regards – Grant.
>
>
>
>
> DTCC Public (White)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf
> Of Mitch Mccluhan
> Sent: 09 June 2020 13:51
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes"
>
> ATTENTION: External Email – Be Suspicious of Attachments, Links and
> Requests for Login Information.
>
>  Everyone,
> I can tell you as a fact that there are a number of things are true.  Many
> "modernization" projects do end up not being completed, no big mainframe
> shop is looking to get off the mainframe, there are a large number of
> projects underway where the client is "modernizing" on the mainframe
> (language, file conversion, DBMS conversion, etc) and lastly (not a lot,
> but some) there are mainframe shops that are going to the zCloud which is
> essentially moving from one data center to another, keeping the mainframe.
> Anyone who tells you most (100%?, really?) mainframe users are going to
> distributed or distributed platform cloud are exaggerating the truth.  I
> know this because mainframe modernization is what I do for a living.
> Mitch
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Bridges 
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Tue, Jun 9, 2020 7:02 am
> Subject: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes"
>
> A coworker just sent me this brief article.
>
>
> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.techrepublic.com%2Farticle%2Feveryone-wants-to-retire-mainframes-but-74-of-modernization-efforts-fail%2F=02%7C01%7CRon.Wells%40OMF.COM%7C725a6e6bbfc7491e27da08d80c746d3d%7C57c0053cb5f84a1e8bb6e8afa09f3b82%7C0%7C0%7C637273041502068880=x%2BEGwGWvVL%2F8lxapfBsYAjOcUtxZ3xmlb2rTqMoMeAE%3D=0
>
> I'm interested in two aspects of this:
>
> 1) The writer uses the word "modernization" quite a bit, and as far as I
> can tell she uses it, without explanation, to mean "switching from
> mainframes to more recently invented platforms".  This is the old
> assumption we've talked about recently.
>
> 2) There's a really surprising number in there:
>
> "...almost 100% of survey respondents plan to move legacy applications to
> the cloud this year and the motivation to move is clear:
>
> - 60% strongly agree they will be left behind competitively if they fail
> to modernize
> - 33% say modernizing has allowed the company to be more reactive to
> market changes
> - 34% say legacy modernization has accelerated digital transformation
> projects
>
> About three-quarters of leaders said they have started a modernization
> program but failed to complete it"
>
> Can that "almost 100%" claim be true?  I confess that three out of my last
> three clients are talking about eliminating the mainframe, but I supposed
> it to be an anomaly.  Maybe the survey used the word "modernize" and the
> author ~assumed~ this must mean dropping the mainframe.
>
> The article also says "Mainframes are still critical to business
> operations with 71% of the Fortune 500 depending on these machines,
> including 92 of the world's 100 largest banks".  Come on - she's telling us
> that almost ~all~ of those companies intend to switch legacy applications
> to the cloud?  I just can't buy that.  ~My~ bank had certainly better not
> be planning such a move.
>
> ---
> Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
>
> /* If a problem has a single neck, it has a simple solution. */
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> 

Re: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes"

2020-06-09 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Everyone,
I can tell you as a fact that there are a number of things are true.  Many 
"modernization" projects do end up not being completed, no big mainframe shop 
is looking to get off the mainframe, there are a large number of projects 
underway where the client is "modernizing" on the mainframe (language, file 
conversion, DBMS conversion, etc) and lastly (not a lot, but some) there are 
mainframe shops that are going to the zCloud which is essentially moving from 
one data center to another, keeping the mainframe.
Anyone who tells you most (100%?, really?) mainframe users are going to 
distributed or distributed platform cloud are exaggerating the truth.  I know 
this because mainframe modernization is what I do for a living.
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Bob Bridges 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tue, Jun 9, 2020 7:02 am
Subject: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes"

A coworker just sent me this brief article.

https://www.techrepublic.com/article/everyone-wants-to-retire-mainframes-but-74-of-modernization-efforts-fail/

I'm interested in two aspects of this:

1) The writer uses the word "modernization" quite a bit, and as far as I can 
tell she uses it, without explanation, to mean "switching from mainframes to 
more recently invented platforms".  This is the old assumption we've talked 
about recently.

2) There's a really surprising number in there:

"...almost 100% of survey respondents plan to move legacy applications to the 
cloud this year and the motivation to move is clear:

- 60% strongly agree they will be left behind competitively if they fail to 
modernize
- 33% say modernizing has allowed the company to be more reactive to market 
changes
- 34% say legacy modernization has accelerated digital transformation projects 

About three-quarters of leaders said they have started a modernization program 
but failed to complete it"

Can that "almost 100%" claim be true?  I confess that three out of my last 
three clients are talking about eliminating the mainframe, but I supposed it to 
be an anomaly.  Maybe the survey used the word "modernize" and the author 
~assumed~ this must mean dropping the mainframe.

The article also says "Mainframes are still critical to business operations 
with 71% of the Fortune 500 depending on these machines, including 92 of the 
world's 100 largest banks".  Come on - she's telling us that almost ~all~ of 
those companies intend to switch legacy applications to the cloud?  I just 
can't buy that.  ~My~ bank had certainly better not be planning such a move.

---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313

/* If a problem has a single neck, it has a simple solution. */

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 2 Spaces after periods [was: RE: Rexx parse using period as placeholder]

2020-02-28 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Boomer?
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Tom Brennan 
To: IBM-MAIN 
Sent: Fri, Feb 28, 2020 9:49 am
Subject: Re: 2 Spaces after periods [was: RE: Rexx parse using period as 
placeholder]

Boomer :)

On 2/28/2020 7:40 AM, Mitch Mccluhan wrote:
>  I VOTE FOR 2 SPACES!!!  Is that loud enough?  It has ALWAYS made reading, 
>easier.
> Mitch
>  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel C. Ewing 
> To: IBM-MAIN 
> Sent: Fri, Feb 28, 2020 9:26 am
> Subject: Re: 2 Spaces after periods [was: RE: Rexx parse using period as 
> placeholder]
> 
> This is a sentence ending with one space. This is a sentence ending with
> two spaces.  My email client is supposedly using a proportional,
> variable width font, and the typical smaller width used for a space
> character tends to make sentences merge together visually when only a
> single space is used.  Two spaces make the end of a sentence more
> apparent visually, especially since with many fonts a "period" is almost
> indistinguishable from a speck of dirt on the screen.  The improved
> visual separation with two spaces is even greater on typical browser fonts.
> 
> I personally think the argument for a single space at end of sentence is
> BS, made up out of laziness by someone who has not yet needed reading
> glasses.  Setting off sentences with extra space was a long-established
> practice with good handwriting, not something  that originated because
> typewriters had imprecise spacing.
> 
> Yes, a single space at end of sentence may now be acceptable, but it is
> aesthetically inferior.
>      JC Ewing
> 
> On 2/28/20 5:38 AM, Joe Monk wrote:
>> The rule now is 1 space after a period.
>>
>> Two spaces after a period was the rule on a typewriter, because the fonts
>> weren't proportional, they were monospace. This led to uneven spacing of
>> words on paper, so two spaces was the rule.
>>
>> Nowadays, on a computer, the fonts are proportional. For instance on a
>> typewriter, the characters i and a take the same amount of space. But on a
>> word processor, i and a dont take the same amount of space. Thus, no need
>> for two spaces.
>>
>> This is a monospace font.
>> This is a proportional font.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:59 PM Paul Gilmartin <
>> 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:48:44 -0500, Steve Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for another reminder I'm "really old" :-).  The rule, btw, is two
>>>> spaces at the end of a sentence.  And I think it makes at least as much
>>>> sense for proportional fonts as mono.  You can (and I do) have Word check
>>>> to make sure they're always there...
>>>>
>>> Specifically, not after titles:  "Ms.  Smith", "Dr.  Jones:.  Also bad
>>> places for
>>> automatic linebreaks.
>>>
>>> -- gil
>>>
>>> --
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>
>> --
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 2 Spaces after periods [was: RE: Rexx parse using period as placeholder]

2020-02-28 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 I VOTE FOR 2 SPACES!!!  Is that loud enough?  It has ALWAYS made reading, 
easier.
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Joel C. Ewing 
To: IBM-MAIN 
Sent: Fri, Feb 28, 2020 9:26 am
Subject: Re: 2 Spaces after periods [was: RE: Rexx parse using period as 
placeholder]

This is a sentence ending with one space. This is a sentence ending with 
two spaces.  My email client is supposedly using a proportional, 
variable width font, and the typical smaller width used for a space 
character tends to make sentences merge together visually when only a 
single space is used.  Two spaces make the end of a sentence more 
apparent visually, especially since with many fonts a "period" is almost 
indistinguishable from a speck of dirt on the screen.  The improved 
visual separation with two spaces is even greater on typical browser fonts.

I personally think the argument for a single space at end of sentence is 
BS, made up out of laziness by someone who has not yet needed reading 
glasses.  Setting off sentences with extra space was a long-established 
practice with good handwriting, not something  that originated because 
typewriters had imprecise spacing.

Yes, a single space at end of sentence may now be acceptable, but it is 
aesthetically inferior.
     JC Ewing

On 2/28/20 5:38 AM, Joe Monk wrote:
> The rule now is 1 space after a period.
>
> Two spaces after a period was the rule on a typewriter, because the fonts
> weren't proportional, they were monospace. This led to uneven spacing of
> words on paper, so two spaces was the rule.
>
> Nowadays, on a computer, the fonts are proportional. For instance on a
> typewriter, the characters i and a take the same amount of space. But on a
> word processor, i and a dont take the same amount of space. Thus, no need
> for two spaces.
>
> This is a monospace font.
> This is a proportional font.
>
> Joe
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:59 PM Paul Gilmartin <
> 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:48:44 -0500, Steve Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for another reminder I'm "really old" :-).  The rule, btw, is two
>>> spaces at the end of a sentence.  And I think it makes at least as much
>>> sense for proportional fonts as mono.  You can (and I do) have Word check
>>> to make sure they're always there...
>>>
>> Specifically, not after titles:  "Ms.  Smith", "Dr.  Jones:.  Also bad
>> places for
>> automatic linebreaks.
>>
>> -- gil
>>
>> --
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


-- 
Joel C. Ewing

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: leaving early

2019-10-16 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...why did this go out to this group?
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Nai, Dean 
To: IBM-MAIN 
Sent: Wed, Oct 16, 2019 3:16 pm
Subject: leaving early

1 hour comp.

Dean Nai
Senior z/OS Systems Programmer
Technical Services Group
Department of Information Technology
State of New Hampshire
27 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03301
 work: 603-271-1529


Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this message are
confidential.
Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, use or dissemination (either
whole or in part) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of
this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message
from your system.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Test Data Generator

2019-07-15 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...check out Daisy from RES, Srl.  www.res-it.com/en.  
http://www.res-it.com/resgroup/brochure/eng/DaisySuite%20ENG.pdf
Mitch McCluhan
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Baron Carter 
To: IBM-MAIN 
Sent: Mon, Jul 15, 2019 8:07 am
Subject: Test Data Generator

Looking for a test data generator that does not require a connection to a DB 
source or DB target.  Must support RI and is able to generate large volumes of 
data to non DB files such as txt or csv.  Platform can be Windows or Mainframe. 
 Any suggestions would be appreciated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: JCL "diagramming"?

2018-03-29 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 It is a very weak tool and doesn't relate back to the programs being executed, 
or the schedules from the batch scheduler.

Regards,

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Mike Schwab <mike.a.sch...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Thu, Mar 29, 2018 2:57 pm
Subject: Re: JCL "diagramming"?

CA (Computer Associates) still sells JCLFLOW.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Edward Gould <edgould1...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On Mar 29, 2018, at 10:22 AM, John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> This is a weird idea that is floating around in my head. I am wondering if
>> there is any software which can create a "picture", "diagram", or
>> "flowchart" of JCL? I'm not too sure if this is even a useful thought. It's
>> just a scratch that I must itch (or something like that).
>>
>> What this may eventually morph into is a scheduling diagram showing our
>> production job flow.
>>
>> --
>> I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove
>> it.
>>
>> Maranatha! <><
>> John McKown
>
> John,
>
> There used to be (NO idea if it still exists) a product named JCLFLOW, For a 
> while (long ago albeit) it was required during production turnover.
> The production support really liked it .
> Not sure if it is still around.
>
> Ed
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: JCL "diagramming"?

2018-03-29 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...check JMAN from RES.  Top of the line tool.  The companion tool, Docet, 
provides graphical representations of JCL and batch schedules.  
www.res-it.com/en 


Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

On Thursday, March 29, 2018 John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote:
This is a weird idea that is floating around in my head. I am wondering if
there is any software which can create a "picture", "diagram", or
"flowchart" of JCL? I'm not too sure if this is even a useful thought. It's
just a scratch that I must itch (or something like that).

What this may eventually morph into is a scheduling diagram showing our
production job flow.

-- 
I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove
it.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: JCL Convertor

2017-07-28 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 One of the JCL automation products (J-MAN from RES) does that.  It can read 
the source program and determine how the file is accessed.

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Fri, Jul 28, 2017 8:46 am
Subject: Re: JCL Convertor

On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:49:38 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:

>On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:56:06 +0300, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>
>>I know. This is a function i'll add if no product that doea that.
>
>It is not possible to completely duplicate the checking that RACF will perform 
>except by actually submitting the job and seeing what happens. ...
>
Even for data sets allocated with DD statements, JCL gives no indication
whether the data set will be written or only read.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: JCL Convertor

2017-07-26 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
and J-MAN from RES does even more.

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 Lizette Koehler <stars...@mindspring.com> wrote:
Sounds like you are validating access and a few other things. Trying to prevent 
JOB failures during production by preprocessing.

I know JCL+ by SEA and PROJCL by ASG will do that.

Lizette



-Original Message-
>From: ITschak Mugzach <imugz...@gmail.com>
>Sent: Jul 26, 2017 1:59 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: JCL Convertor
>
>Is submit the only way of doing this?
>Extra functions needed, for example, is ensuring the user has sufficient
>racf authority to resources used by the job.
>
>ITschak
>
>בתאריך 26 ביול 2017 23:45,‏ "Paul Gilmartin" <
>000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> כתב:
>
>> 

On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:48:58 +0300, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>>
>> >I am sure this question was asked here before... Can a user program Call
>> >the converter, supplying input file and get the output? Don't want to
>> >reinvent the wheel, but was requested to had extra checks that are not
>> >offered by available products in the market.
>> >
>> Use a COND or an IF to make the job do nothing. (TYPRUN gives incomplete
>> conversion.) Scrape the JESJCLIN with SDSF. Even so, you will not see
>> substitutions in PARMDD, done by the access method(?) during execution.
>>
>> -- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: JCL Convertor

2017-07-26 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ITschak:

What are you trying to do?  When you say "available products", which ones are 
you referring to?

Regards,

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: ITschak Mugzach <imugz...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Wed, Jul 26, 2017 2:49 pm
Subject: JCL Convertor

I am sure this question was asked here before... Can a user program Call
the converter, supplying input file and get the output? Don't want to
reinvent the wheel, but was requested to had extra checks that are not
offered by available products in the market.

-- 
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|** Automatic ISCM**  (Information Security
Contiguous Monitoring) **|  *

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Displacement of ASG View Direct and PRO/JCL

2017-05-31 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...there is a better tool to replace ProJCL (I was one of the Product Managers 
on the precursor to ProJCL back in the day).  The tool is J-MAN from RES.  It 
is far superior to any other JCL automation tool.  The conversion is 
straightforward and simple.

Regards,

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler <stars...@mindspring.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Wed, May 31, 2017 8:58 am
Subject: Re: Displacement of ASG View Direct and PRO/JCL

I have found from a past shop that SEA JCL+ to be a good replacement for PROJCL.

The company was very helpful in converting from PROJCL to their version of the 
syntax checker.

It was an easy migration to their tool.

Not sure about View direct.

Systemware has a product that might be a good replacement.  Or CA has products.


Systemware Content Server z/OS (Xptr)
Systemware Content Server DS (for distributed content servers on Windows 
and Unix platforms)



Lizette


> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Steven Liston
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 2:59 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Displacement of ASG View Direct and PRO/JCL
> 
> Do any members have exposure to displacement of ASG's View Direct and/or
> PRO/JCL products?
> 
> Looking for experience of the displacement and migration exercise and
> timeframes therein (which I expect for View Direct would be directly related
> to the number of docs stored in the current repository).
> 
> Expect PRO/JCL would be fairly straightforward but View Direct perhaps more
> challenging.
> 
> 
> Regards.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Migration of Mainframe to other plat form

2017-05-04 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 For all of you who know who I am, I can provide some insight into this issue 
generically.  I am not familiar with MetaWare (I have not run into them ever in 
any project I have been involved in over the past 18 years).

Regards,

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Steve Thompson <ste...@copper.net>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Thu, May 4, 2017 9:01 am
Subject: Re: Migration of Mainframe to other plat form

On 05/04/2017 05:18 AM, James Wellingtin wrote:

>
> Have anybody experience with the vendor MetaWare doing migration ,
> Did they succeed in migrating.
> What did they migrate to
> How long time did it take


I understand your frustration. I am guilty of what I have been 
frustrated with others about. One asks a question, and never gets 
a direct answer to the main question being asked.

After doing a bit of research on MetaWare, assuming we are 
talking about the same company, they are a privately owned France 
based entity.

I have found nothing about them, using Google, to know much about 
them on a technical/effective basis. Their website doesn't give 
much to go on in this area. However, I am amused by their stats 
they publish. Such as a 295% ROI in one year. But then again, I 
know that 86.3% of all stats are made up.

And so, since no one has said anything about them in/on this 
list, one must assume that (1) none of us have experience with 
them, or (2) those that do are not allowed to discuss anything 
because of an NDA (Non Disclosure Agreement) whether effected by 
an out of court settlement or actually signed prior to 
engagement, etc. or, (3) those who do have experience with them 
are Lurkers that never post.

Regards,
Steve Thompson

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Migrating Cobol

2017-03-26 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
...contact me.  We've done it a number if times.

Mitch

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

On Sunday, March 26, 2017 James Wellingtin <jameswelling...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey
I have posted this to the cicslist , and someone there asked me to post it
to this group as well for feedbackj

We are very soon to migrate from COBOL ENT V4.2.0 to either Cobol 5.2. or
6.1

Do anybody have made any experience in doing that

Have you experienced any problem ?
Please describe
What have been the main issues
Are there speciel things which should be taken care of .

All kind of knowledge and experience would be appreciated.

What version of Cobol are you running

Now it is nearly a year ago Cobol 6.1 went GA
Does anybody have migrated to that, and is it worth going to that version ,
or should you order 5.2 instead

Regards
James

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Is it really possible to migrate Mainframe to Cloud ??

2017-01-12 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Absolutely!!

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Peter <dbajava...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Thu, Jan 12, 2017 10:02 am
Subject: Is it really possible to migrate Mainframe to Cloud ??

Hi

Just found this link thought I can share

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yes-you-can-migrate-your-mainframe-cloud-stephen-orban


Peter

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: remote system support (i.e. the data center is 2 states away from you).

2016-09-27 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 John,

You almost must have a camera for 2-way communication.  You can get a good 
quality USB camera for your computer from Amazon or ebay.  They work 
exceptionally well.  I recommend you get one with an internal microphone.  
Seeing people's facial expressions when they are talking can make a huge 
difference.  Do you have external speakers?  If not, I recommend them as the 
sound quality is much better and this  is important when you are working with a 
variety of people that have varying quality of microphones themselves, along 
with accents.  

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Tue, Sep 27, 2016 11:27 am
Subject: Re: remote system support (i.e. the data center is 2 states away from 
you).

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Mitch Mccluhan <
005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

>  John,
>
> I've been working remotely for years.  The issue is being relevant.  Stay
> on top of things.  Look for areas that might benefit from your experience
> and expertise.  Don't miss ANY meetings, conference calls, etc.  Don't be
> shy about requesting anything and everything you would need to be an
> integral part of the support team.
>

​Which leads me to another question: how do you do meetings? Video
conferencing? Skype? I don't have a camera on my home computer, but I do
have a very nice (10 inch) Android tablet.​



>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Mitch McCluhan
> mitc...@aol.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com>
> To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
> Sent: Tue, Sep 27, 2016 10:57 am
> Subject: remote system support (i.e. the data center is 2 states away from
> you).
>
> This is kind of a curiosity question and kind of serious. There is a chance
> that I might be offered a job where the data center is about 20 hours away
> by car (according to Google maps). Needless to say, there is no going in
> overnight to fix a problem. So I'm wondering if others here support a z/OS
> system where getting to the data center would be a long commute (unless you
> have your own plane, like some I know). How does that work out? In this
> shop, we haven't had any "operators" for about 5 years, maybe more. We
> systems people do all the hardware interfacing, tape management, IPL'ing,
> and "CE baby sitting" (being on-site while they work). This is really
> removed me from the historic paradigm. I somewhat like the thought of
> working from the house. But I also worry about being somewhat excluded from
> the unofficial information channels (i.e. company gossip). I also wonder
> about things like meetings and just being "invisible" and so "out of mind"
> when decisions are made.
>
> --
> Heisenberg may have been here.
>
> Unicode: http://xkcd.com/1726/
>
> Maranatha! <><
> John McKown
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
Heisenberg may have been here.

Unicode: http://xkcd.com/1726/

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: remote system support (i.e. the data center is 2 states away from you).

2016-09-27 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 John,

I've been working remotely for years.  The issue is being relevant.  Stay on 
top of things.  Look for areas that might benefit from your experience and 
expertise.  Don't miss ANY meetings, conference calls, etc.  Don't be shy about 
requesting anything and everything you would need to be an integral part of the 
support team.

Regards,

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Tue, Sep 27, 2016 10:57 am
Subject: remote system support (i.e. the data center is 2 states away from you).

This is kind of a curiosity question and kind of serious. There is a chance
that I might be offered a job where the data center is about 20 hours away
by car (according to Google maps). Needless to say, there is no going in
overnight to fix a problem. So I'm wondering if others here support a z/OS
system where getting to the data center would be a long commute (unless you
have your own plane, like some I know). How does that work out? In this
shop, we haven't had any "operators" for about 5 years, maybe more. We
systems people do all the hardware interfacing, tape management, IPL'ing,
and "CE baby sitting" (being on-site while they work). This is really
removed me from the historic paradigm. I somewhat like the thought of
working from the house. But I also worry about being somewhat excluded from
the unofficial information channels (i.e. company gossip). I also wonder
about things like meetings and just being "invisible" and so "out of mind"
when decisions are made.

-- 
Heisenberg may have been here.

Unicode: http://xkcd.com/1726/

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Limit on the number of concatenated datasets

2016-08-22 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Joe,

There is one, yes.  I believe it is 256.  Advice from everyone else?

Regards,

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Reichman Joseph <joseph.reich...@irs.gov>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Mon, Aug 22, 2016 10:38 am
Subject: Limit on the number of concatenated datasets

Hi

I looked in the JCL reference and DFSMS bookshelf and did not see a limit on 
the number of concatenated datasets


Would anybody know if there is one ?


Thanks

Joe Reichman
Joe Reichman

IT Specialist
Master Files Division
New Carrollton Federal Building, B7-182
OS:IT:AD:CP:I:IB
Flex M,T,Th,F
Home office (240) 863 - 3965
Office (240) 613-4350
Cell (917) 748-9693
TOD M - F  7:30 am  - 4:00 pm


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Delta Outage

2016-08-09 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Linda:

I agree!!

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Linda <linda.lst...@comcast.net>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 5:45 pm
Subject: Re: Delta Outage

Apparently Delta needs a couple of mainframes and GDPS or maybe metro mirror 
instead. ;). 

Linda

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 9, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Gerhard Adam <gada...@charter.net> wrote:
> 
> Apparently there are 500 servers involved.  I have my own speculations as to
> why they didn't declare a disaster.
> 
> As a result, the outage was extended because it appears to be taking them in
> excess of 12 hours to reboot everything.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Steve Beaver
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 8:41 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Delta Outage
> 
> Then WHY did they not initiate their DR and move all systems to the HOT
> Site.  I just finished putting in a System that has a RTO=RPO=0 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 10:17 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Delta Outage
> 
> From what I understand, it isn't a simple power outage, but rather a fire in
> the data center.
> 
> http://arstechnica.com/business/2016/08/data-center-disaster-disrupts-delta-
> airlines/
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Steve Beaver
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 8:10 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Delta Outage
> 
> I live in Texas and we have ERCOT, and Texas produces more wind energy than
> 3 countries.  And Texas has NO Interconnects To other grids.  
> 
> It its reprehensible that Delta does not have enough battery power and
> gen-sets to cover the screw-ups by Atlanta Power. AA is in  Irving and
> unless there is a major storm in that area does not lose power  
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IBM sold TWS (IWS) ???

2016-07-12 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Folks,

I have heard through the grapevine that only the development team was sold off. 
 The sales and services arm are still within the IBM TWS group.

Regards,

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: zMan <zedgarhoo...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Tue, Jul 12, 2016 9:07 am
Subject: Re: IBM sold TWS (IWS) ???

For example, the Optim products were quietly sold to Unicom last year. No
sign of it on IBM, who can still sell them. So no apparent change for
users, just unhappy employees (well, maybe -- some are probably glad to be
at a company that's interested in their product).

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Dana Mitchell <mitchd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The following was posted on the 'Watching IBM' Facebook group page on July
> 6:
>
> Sent to Watching IBM: "Hi and thanks for your contributions in sharing
> information about IBM across countries. Please, as usual keep me anonymous.
> Today IBM Italia announced to employee of IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler
> (formerly known as TWS) a sale of business of its product development and
> support to an indian company. 75 employees affected at the Rome Software
> lab will be transferred to another company with no choice, even if based in
> the same location (at least for now). Probably the first step to the
> dismission of the whole italian lab, founded in 1978, and according to
> Wikipedia is one of the largest software laboratory in the European Union."
>
>
> Dana
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IBM Acquiring EZSource Code Analysis Tools

2016-06-03 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
It's primarily used in EMEA at this time.

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

On Friday, June 3, 2016 Rob Schramm <rob.schr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone on the list with experience using any of the EZSource products?

Rob Schramm

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016, 10:23 PM Timothy Sipples <sipp...@sg.ibm.com> wrote:

> There's some interesting mainframe business news today. IBM just announced
> the pending acquisition of the company behind the EZSource development
> tools. Here's the press release:
>
> "IBM to Acquire EZSource to Help Developers Modernize Mainframe
> Applications for Digital Business"
> http://www.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/49810.wss
>
> and here's the link to EZSource product information:
>
> http://www.ezsource.com
>
> IBM expects the acquisition to be closed later this quarter (second
> calendar quarter, 2016).
>
> The EZSource Eclipse-based tools are already well integrated with IBM
> Rational tools such as Rational Developer for z Systems (RDz) and Rational
> Team Concert (RTC) and with many other tools and platforms. More to come, I
> expect.
>
>
> 
> Timothy Sipples
> IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems, AP/GCG/MEA
> E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
-- 

Rob Schramm
The Art of Mainframe, Inc

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: GDG creation tracking

2016-05-09 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 The Docet and J-Man tools from RES (www.res-it.com) can do this quite easily.

Regards,

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Jake Anderson <justmainfra...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Mon, May 9, 2016 5:29 am
Subject: GDG creation tracking

Hello Group,

Is it possible to track the GDG creation, like which Job creates it , then
to know the Jobs which the created GDG as inputs ?

Is there any third party tool that can help to accomplish the above task ?

Any suggestion that can help me on my research.

Jake

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Why sort (was Microprocessor Optimization Primer)

2016-04-07 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
...hey Wayne.

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

On Thursday, April 7, 2016 Wayne Bickerdike <wayn...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm slightly gobsmacked that this discussion is needed. I guess the forest
is lost in the trees.

I can recommend "Principles of Program Design" by Michael Jackson c. 1975.

Of greater concern is the implication that Oracle on AIX outperforms DB2 on
z/OS at our shop. Surely not :(

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Joel C. Ewing <jcew...@acm.org> wrote:

> On 04/06/2016 07:01 AM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
> > On 05/04/2016 01:20 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
> >> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:45:37 +1000, Andrew Rowley wrote:
> >>
> >>> A Hashmap potentially allows you to read sequentially and match records
> >>> between files, without caring about the order.
> >> Can you please explain what you mean by this? Are you talking about
> >> using
> >> the hashmap to determine which record to read next, and so to read the
> >> records in an order that is logically sequential, but physically
> >> random? If so,
> >> that is not at all like reading the records sequentially.
> >>
> >
> > If one file fits in memory, you can read it sequentially into a
> > Hashmap with the using the data you want to match as the key.
> > Then read the second one, also sequentially, retrieving matching
> > records from the Hashmap by key. You can also remove them from the
> > Hashmap as they are found if you need to know if any are unmatched.
> >
> > But this is a solution for a made up case - I don't know whether it is
> > a common situation. I was interested in hearing real reasons why sort
> > is so common on z/OS i.e. Why sort?
> >
> > On Hashmaps etc. in general - they are the memory equivalent to
> > indexed datasets (VSAM etc) versus sequential datasets. Their
> > availability opens up many new ways to process data - and algorithm
> > changes are often where the big savings can be made.
> >
> I believe others have already alluded to the potential time advantage of
> processing a large number of updates in key order rather than randomly
> when external data is indexed but actually physically ordered by some
> key. The reason why this has historically been the case is that
> external disk storage devices which allow random access have
> rotational-latency delay and access-head-positioning delay which is
> minimized when doing full-track or even multi-track I/O and when
> accessing adjacent cylinders. The way to update the data in minimal
> real time is to do the I/O in minimal disk rotations, accessing all data
> needed on the same track in one rotation and all data in one cylinder
> before moving to an adjacent cylinder. Crucial to this concept is
> understanding that z/OS includes support within I/O access methods which
> allows applications to successfully exploit the ability of DASD hardware
> to transfer one, several, or all data blocks on a track as a single
> operation within a single disk revolution.
>
> With emulated DASD and hardware DASD caching, the effects of physical
> track and cylinder boundaries may be unknownl, but it is still likely
> that minimizing repeated visitations to an emulated track or an
> emulated cylinder will achieve similar locality of reference on physical
> DASD, reduce latency delays and improve the effectiveness of hardware
> caching. Processing transaction records in the same order as the
> database records are physically stored on an external file gives the
> best odds of grouping transactions needing the same track and cylinder
> together and for minimizing I/O delays and minimizing demands on DASD
> cache storage and processor storage for file buffers. Processing
> transactions in a different order increases the likelihood that the
> needed file data to process the transaction is no longer in processor
> memory or disk cache and that at a minimum the time equivalent of
> another disk revolution will be required to obtain it.
>
> It was not uncommon with VSAM files for transaction sorting to improve
> real-time processing speed sufficiently that the break-even point even
> with sorting overhead could be as low as updating only 5% of the
> database. These techniques were common in MVS and its z/OS successor
> applications because it was common for those systems to deal with very
> large files and databases where tricks like this were necessary in order
> to meet constrained nightly batch processing windows.. Since it is
> common in z/OS to be dealing with very large files and databases, there
> are always files in those environments that are too large to consider
> placing the entire file in memory, no matter how large processor memory

Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?

2016-03-15 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
I believe that's it.  Notice what it says about the "bug" being found in a 
relay panel.

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Field, Alan <alan.fi...@bluecrossmn.com> wrote:
This?

https://www.google.com/search?q=grace+hopper+bug+picture=1600=760=isch=hd3yOe9lqAoxiM%253A%253BzhUDz8dJ4fjqaM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.wired.com%25252F2013%25252F12%25252Fgoogles-doodle-honors-grace-hopper-and-entomology%25252F=iu=m=hd3yOe9lqAoxiM%253A%252CzhUDz8dJ4fjqaM%252C_=__W_mU2alM863BQxm2C11rLU2w_uc%3D=0ahUKEwijzbnrl8TLAhXqtYMKHTQTA6MQyjcILw=gMjoVqONLerrjgS0poyYCg#imgrc=hd3yOe9lqAoxiM%3A

Alan Field
Systems Engineer Principal
Blue Cross Blue Shield of MN

651.662.3546

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mitch Mccluhan
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?

I've seen a photo of the actual bug Grace had used to coin the phrase.

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 CM Poncelet <ponce...@bcs.org.uk> wrote:
AFAIK The original Grace Hopper 'bug' was an actual bug - some kind of moth. 
There could be a photo of it somewhere.

Richard Pinion wrote:

>I thought the term debugging came from the days when the first 
>computers were made from vacuum tubes. The tubes produced light, which 
>in turn attracted bugs. Periodically, the computer had to be "debugged".
>
>My source was probably urban legend.
>
>
>
>--- wdonze...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>From: William Donzelli <wdonze...@gmail.com>
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?
>Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:56:07 -0400
>
>No, she did not. The term "bug", relating to flaws and errors in a 
>circuit*, shows up a fair amount in 1930s ham radio literature, for 
>example.
>
>* "bug" also applies to automatic Morse keys, of course.
>
>--
>Will
>
> 

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Lindy Mayfield <lindy.mayfi...@sas.com> wrote:
> 
>
>>Was watching NCIS Los Angeles and the geek was showing off to the 
>>female geek by saying Grace Hopper didn't coin the term bug, but 
>>Thomas Edison did. (Which he probably stole from someone else, 
>>probably Tesla, but that just me being facetious.)
>>
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__theinstitute.ieee.
>>org_technology-2Dfocus_technology-2Dhistory_did-2Dyou-2Dknow-2Dedison-
>>2Dcoined-2Dthe-2Dterm-2Dbug=BQICaQ=zjLIypOkeQKJfe4BYrJ5J55pYA-45JE
>>lRiaMoh2hP7Q=SaL11MvL9LWz-4CkTmMYltgrRR9mrR4t5HY7AKmOSPE=D9pf2y9wA
>>5Mcx0HbXdxOSfm2zlvNj3XNUzRukuvJTtw=VRdEtXtLTT6xbNhIj8uo9wgBYPUAFB1Ko
>>q80Zb-mzkE=
>>
>>Regards,
>>Lindy
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>>email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>>
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
>
>
>_
>Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> 
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the named addressee you must not disseminate, distribute or copy 
this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have 
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you 
are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, 
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?

2016-03-15 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
I've seen a photo of the actual bug Grace had used to coin the phrase.

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 CM Poncelet <ponce...@bcs.org.uk> wrote:
AFAIK The original Grace Hopper 'bug' was an actual bug - some kind of 
moth. There could be a photo of it somewhere.

Richard Pinion wrote:

>I thought the term debugging came from the days when the first computers
>were made from vacuum tubes. The tubes produced light, which in turn 
>attracted bugs. Periodically, the computer had to be "debugged".
>
>My source was probably urban legend.
>
>
>
>--- wdonze...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>From: William Donzelli <wdonze...@gmail.com>
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?
>Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:56:07 -0400
>
>No, she did not. The term "bug", relating to flaws and errors in a
>circuit*, shows up a fair amount in 1930s ham radio literature, for
>example.
>
>* "bug" also applies to automatic Morse keys, of course.
>
>--
>Will
>
> 

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Lindy Mayfield <lindy.mayfi...@sas.com> wrote:
> 
>
>>Was watching NCIS Los Angeles and the geek was showing off to the female geek 
>>by saying Grace Hopper didn't coin the term bug, but Thomas Edison did. 
>>(Which he probably stole from someone else, probably Tesla, but that just me 
>>being facetious.)
>>
>>http://theinstitute.ieee.org/technology-focus/technology-history/did-you-know-edison-coined-the-term-bug
>>
>>Regards,
>>Lindy
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>>
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
>
>
>_
>Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> 
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IBM RDEz

2016-03-08 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
Steve:

There are a number of shops using RDz and it is being installed at a major 
credit card provider in the southwest U.S. at this point in time.

Regards,
 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Steve Beaver <st...@stevebeaver.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Tue, Mar 8, 2016 8:51 am
Subject: IBM RDEz

Does anyone's shop use RDz?

Steve

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-12 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Tom,

Contact me offline on this via email.  I am in the process of doing the same 
thing for a client on the east coast.

Regards,

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Ambros, Thomas <thomas_amb...@keybank.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Tue, Jan 12, 2016 10:05 am
Subject: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

My apologies if there is a Cobol listserv that I should have subscribed to and 
submitted the question there, if someone knows of it please let me know so I 
can redirect to the correct place.  

Pardon me, also, if I use terms incorrectly in phrasing my question because I 
couldn't be weaker in application programming or Cobol idiosyncracies. 

Our site has occasion to import files from a Unisys site running 'MCP Level 57 
Miser level 15.2', and integrate the data with the application datasets on the 
local system.  I do not know the Cobol product the Unisys site is using, I have 
inquiries out but no answers yet.  There are at least a few items causing our 
application programmers some difficulties.  

For example, it appears that the COMP fields in the Unisys file do not occupy 
storage the same as they do on zOS.   For example, a COMP field with three 
digits occupies one and one-half bytes on the Unisys file whereas on zOS it 
would be a halfword.  

Given the size and number of the files and descriptions to convert, coding a 
conversion by hand is not entirely practical.  

I realize this is a pretty vague request, but does anyone know of a conversion 
utility or compiler directive to make the translation from the Unisys 
implementation of Cobol FD's to Enterprise Cobol?   I have done some basic 
Google searching but nothing I find appears to address this sort of thing very 
closely. 

Thomas Ambros
zEnterprise Operating Systems
zEnterprise Systems Management
518-436-6433





This communication may contain privileged and/or confidential information. It 
is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing 
or using any of this information. If you received this communication in error, 
please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic 
personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the 
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse or redisclose 
such information for any purpose other than to provide the services for which 
you are receiving the information.

127 Public Square, Cleveland, OH 44114
If you prefer not to receive future e-mail offers for products or services from 
Key 
send an e-mail to mailto:dnereque...@key.com with 'No Promotional E-mails' in 
the 
SUBJECT line.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Anyone got any ancient DASD manuals?

2016-01-06 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
Mike,

Did you ever get your information?  None of my sources responded.
 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Mike Ross <tmfdm...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Sat, Jan 2, 2016 9:31 pm
Subject: Anyone got any ancient DASD manuals?

I have a friend trying to restore a 9370 system and he needs to
re-init the diag track on the disk. This requires entering some
special commands on the keyboard behind the front panel on the drive
controller itself... and he needs IBM 9335-A01 SERVICE GUIDE (probably
SY33-0113, but not sure) to tell him what they are!

Please check old dusty bookshelves. Any current or former IBM CEs reading this?

Thanks

Mike

http://www.corestore.org
'No greater love hath a man than he lay down his life for his brother.
Not for millions, not for glory, not for fame.
For one person, in the dark, where no one will ever know or see.'

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG ZEKE Responding to program generated messages

2015-12-22 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Hello,

I don't believe Zeke has that capability.  I personally recommend TWS from 
Tivoli.

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Carl Edwards <00df3759e3e7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Tue, Dec 22, 2015 12:00 pm
Subject: ASG ZEKE Responding to program generated messages

I have a client that is considering installing ZEKE. Said client has a fair 
amount of console diakaig that needs to be automated. The questions is Can ZEKE 
recognize console messages generated via a program(DISPLAY UPON CONSOLE) and 
respond to such? 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Conversion from SAG Adabas and Natural to something else

2015-10-31 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...drop me an email.  I have done about 5 or 6 of these types of projects.

 

Mitch McCluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Timothy Sipples <sipp...@sg.ibm.com>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Sent: Sat, Oct 31, 2015 4:20 am
Subject: Re: Conversion from SAG Adabas and Natural to something else


Tony Thigpen wrote:
>I am looking for options to eliminate SAG in a
shop.

IBM has a couple publications that might be of interest if you
haven't
reviewed them
already:

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp5154.html
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg248044.html

>Such
high costs are just not in the budget.

Perhaps that's true at this moment,
but what goals are you hoping to
achieve? In particular, if there are few or no
business benefits associated
with the "to be" state then it's at least harder
to make your business case
work. I recommend answering that question
first.


Timothy
Sipples
IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems,
AP/GCG/MEA
E-Mail:
sipp...@sg.ibm.com

--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: submit restriction

2015-08-05 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...an issue with Job/Scan (or any other tool from Allen Systems Group) is the 
financial viability of ASG.  There are a number of amazing JCL tools on the 
market that do not require the JCL to every be submitted in any form or fashion 
to the internal reader.  And, they have capabilities that go far beyond just 
parsing the JCL and providing the resolved JCL statements.

Regards,

 

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Robinson, Dave (GE Capital NonGE) (GE Capital NonGE) 
dave.robin...@ge.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Aug 5, 2015 9:02 am
Subject: Re: submit restriction


Do you have Job/Scan or a similar JCL checker? They will expand the JCL without
submitting a job.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tim Brown
Sent: 05 August
2015 13:23
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: submit restriction

Can
submit be restricted to only using TYPRUN=SCAN, we have some consultants
analyzing our system and they would like to see expanded JCL but we cant let
them execute it.

Thanks,
Tim
Brown

--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN

--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Scheduling software

2015-05-17 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Everyone:

I concur with Tim regarding TWS.  There are tons of extensions and features 
available to cover the entire enterprise.

Regards,

 

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sun, May 17, 2015 10:15 pm
Subject: Re: Scheduling software


IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler is fantastic, and I recommend it.

However,
since the idea of freebies came up, for those of you with DB2
for z/OS I'd
like to mention a handy scheduler that's included with DB2 for
z/OS at no
additional charge: the DB2 Administrative Task Scheduler. As its
name suggests,
it's a scheduler focused on scheduling DB2 administrative
tasks -- no surprise.
If your needs non-trivially exceed that scope I'd
investigate other, fuller
function options (Tivoli Workload Scheduler
notably), but it is a very useful
DB2 feature. Relatedly, there's another,
no additional charge component, the
Management Console for IMS and DB2 for
z/OS, that you are likely to find useful
in part to take advantage the DB2
Administrative Task
Scheduler.


Timothy
Sipples
IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems,
AP/GCG/MEA
E-Mail:
sipp...@sg.ibm.com
--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Scheduling software

2015-05-15 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 I would strongly recommend against any ASG product.  I personally suggest TWS 
from IBM.  If you currently have a mainframe scheduler, I have been involved in 
a few conversion/migration projects from scheduler X to TWS, using a suite of 
automated tools.

 

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Lopez, Sharon sharon.lo...@nc.gov
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, May 15, 2015 12:54 pm
Subject: Scheduling software


What are the majority of companies using for their mainframe scheduling
software?  Any concerns with ASG (ZEKE/ZEBB) filing for
bankruptcy?




E-mail correspondence to
and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state
official.



Email correspondence to and
from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third
parties.

--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: COBOL 4.2 support

2015-04-22 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
...thanks to all that responded.  One last question.  Can 4.2 and 5.2 exist 
together?  Does anyone have any experience with this?
 

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 8:29 am
Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support


Did you try this search on www.ibm.com?

COBOL LIFECYCLE 4.2

I think you
may find this
URL
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycleapp/PLCDetail.wss?synkey=B984385H82239E03from=spf

Lizette



-Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Mitch Mccluhan
 Sent:
Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:22 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject:
COBOL 4.2 support
 
  Good morning.
 
 Does anyone know how much longer
COBOL 4.2 will be supported?
 
 
 
 Mitch Mccluhan
 mitc...@aol.com





--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


COBOL 4.2 support

2015-04-22 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 Good morning.

Does anyone know how much longer COBOL 4.2 will be supported?

 

Mitch Mccluhan
mitc...@aol.com

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: mhvr...@us.ibm.com?

2015-03-27 Thread Mitch
Tom,

Most of the day yesterday.  Some were down longer than others.
 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Mitch 005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Mar 27, 2015 8:28 am
Subject: Re: mhvr...@us.ibm.com?


Tom,

When was this happening?  IBM was having a problem with a number of
their email servers yesterday.

 


Mitch

 

 

-Original
Message-
From: Tom Marchant
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Mar 27, 2015 8:20 am
Subject: Re:
mhvr...@us.ibm.com?


On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:42:58 -0400, Shmuel Metz
(Seymour J.) wrote:

I've
been getting DNS failures trying to send to
mhvr...@us.ibm.com;
has anybody
else ad that problem? Are the name servers
down?

I haven't had a need to send
email to mhvr...@us.ibm.com recently,

but I just tried to ping us.ibm.com and
couldn't find the IP address.

--

Tom
Marchant

--
For
IBM-MAIN
subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: mhvr...@us.ibm.com?

2015-03-27 Thread Mitch
 Tom,

When was this happening?  IBM was having a problem with a number of their email 
servers yesterday.

 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Tom Marchant 000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Mar 27, 2015 8:20 am
Subject: Re: mhvr...@us.ibm.com?


On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:42:58 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:

I've
been getting DNS failures trying to send to mhvr...@us.ibm.com;
has anybody
else ad that problem? Are the name servers down?

I haven't had a need to send
email to mhvr...@us.ibm.com recently, 
but I just tried to ping us.ibm.com and
couldn't find the IP address.

-- 
Tom
Marchant

--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: bloomberg article on ASG and Chpater 11

2015-03-07 Thread Mitch
 Everyone:

Yep, that was Art.  When I worked there, since I was pretty up the totem pole, 
I called him Art.  I remember that as he was buying up other companies when I 
worked there, he would have me go to the new acquisition and have the owner of 
the company pick me up (no rental car and have them put me up at their house 
(no hotel).  He told me that his desire was to have the biggest catalog of 
software for a privately held software company in the world.  A lot of the 
software companies he bought was at the end of it's useful life, so it was just 
to have the product name in his catalog.  He told his finance department and 
sales management that they were to get at least a letter of intent from any 
prospect.  He would then tell the bank that ASG had sold a contract and have 
that added to the value of the company.  It was truly weird.

 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sat, Mar 7, 2015 8:11 pm
Subject: Re: bloomberg article on ASG and Chpater 11


A friend used to work at ASG, is out of mainframes now. I forwarded this
story
and got the following response:

MISTER Allen (NO one was allowed to call
him Art) once sent out an
email to everyone complaining about the rigors of
flying all over the world
on his private jet, and how he'd like it if people
sent chocolates to his
plane, as long as they were high quality Belgian
chocolates. Yes, at
their own expense.
When you look up megalomaniac in
the dictionary, there's a drawing of
Mr. Allen.

Other ASG stories are
legendary, including folks having to requisition
rubber bands and having them
shipped from HQ *in lots of 10*.

Given that Art's wife was apparently equally
loony and was CFO, I guess the
bankruptcy isn't a surprise. The good
news:
http://www.asg.com/Company/Executive-Management.aspx no longer shows
any
folks named Allen,
-- 
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid
to use
it

--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG Mainfram Product

2015-03-06 Thread Mitch
 Everyone,

Since Bill has opened that can of worms, it is pretty bad.  ASG still exists, 
but their financial house has always been smoke and mirrors.  That is the 
reason I resigned from ASG years ago.

 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Bill Johnson 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Mar 6, 2015 8:59 am
Subject: Re: ASG Mainfram Product


ASG just recently filed for bankruptcy.

Bill
Johnson

On Fri, 3/6/15, Mitch
005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

 Subject: Re: ASG
Mainfram Product
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date: Friday, March 6, 2015,
6:30 AM
 
 Hello:
 
 ASG is having financial
 trouble.  Their website is
there, but it is difficult if
 not impossible to find product information.  A
few of their
 products can eventually be found with a link, but most are
 not
accessible.  I've tried to find information about
 some of their tools (and
they have a lot of them), but their
 website is poorly designed.
 
 If you
want to know about any ASG products, let
 me know as I worked for ASG for a
short while.
  
 
 
 Mitch
 
  
 
  
 
 -Original Message-

From: Mainframe Mainframe mainframe1...@gmail.com
 To: IBM-MAIN
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Sent: Fri, Mar 6, 2015 5:11 am
 Subject: ASG
Mainfram Product
 
 
 Hello Group,
 I was trying to looking web link to get
product and tool
 offered
 by ASG for Mainframe.
 But unfortunately, I am not
getting any such
 link talks
 about ASG Mainframe
 product and atleast use of
that product.
 
 Do anybody have
 idea on
 this.
 

--
 For

IBM-MAIN subscribe /
 signoff / archive access instructions,
 send
 email
to
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu
 with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
  
 

--
 For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
 access instructions,
 send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu
 with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN


--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Municipal mainframe practical (what I meant to send)

2015-03-06 Thread Mitch
 Graham:

I can tell you that IBM does have a phased approach for this type of data 
center migration/consolidation.  I think I had mentioned I was involved a 
project almost exactly like this where there were numerous agencies first 
consolidating from 20 data centers to 2, then modernizing on a single, 
consistent software and tools infrastructure.

DR + Disaster Recovery (sometimes referred to as Business 
Continuation/Continuity)

 


Regards,

Mitch Mccluhan
Application Modernization Consultant
Digital Modernization Services
254-598-4642 - U.S. office
916-271-6575 - U.S. mobile
916-718-8910 - IBM mobile
04 759 16272 - Australian mobile   


 

 

-Original Message-
From: Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Mar 6, 2015 9:10 am
Subject: Re: Municipal mainframe practical (what I meant to send)


Timothy,

Thanks for your comments. Am in touch with IBM. Your
questions:

Has any municipality IT, having grown from nothing, likely to be

anything but server farm/Unix/Microsoft (you know what I mean) plus off 
the
shelf packages.

DR - what's that .. you mean backup?

I would guess our 7
have different packaged software performing same 
functionality; likely some
duplication .. equalling masses of data 
stored in a multitude of proprietary
ways:-( .. a behemoth.

And one needs to convince 7 IT/Council empires .. can
the convincing be 
incremental? Am truly hoping IBM has the 'methodology' to
bring us an 
evolution .. our A'burg muni has a debt/reserves ratio around 25:1
.. is 
gross .. the others are much better off than us. In the end I worry that

politics will override savings!

Graham

On 2015-03-05 12:59 AM, Timothy
Sipples wrote:
 Also recommend you contact both the IBM people who chimed in.
Not me -- I'm
 in Singapore and may be groggy when you call at your reasonable
time. :-)
 However, to give you a few more lines of investigation from
afar

 1. What are they running on those Windows-based servers (and on
any other
 servers)? What sort of applications (in terms of runtimes, in
particular)
 and middleware products?

 2. If there are 7 municipalities,
and (by implication) 7+ primary data
 centers, are there are also at least 7
secondary (DR) centers? Or is DR
 inadequate?

 3. Are the 7
municipalities providing services 7 different ways -- they
 have 7 different
applications for substantial the same service, in other
 words? With 7
different application development and/or support teams? Or do
 they have
substantial agreement on applications?

 The answers to these questions (and
a few others) would be helpful in
 trying to understand better and best
alternatives, if any.




Timothy Sipples
 IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems,
AP/GCG/MEA
 E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com

--
 For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN


--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG Mainfram Product

2015-03-06 Thread Mitch
Hello:

ASG is having financial trouble.  Their website is there, but it is difficult 
if not impossible to find product information.  A few of their products can 
eventually be found with a link, but most are not accessible.  I've tried to 
find information about some of their tools (and they have a lot of them), but 
their website is poorly designed.

If you want to know about any ASG products, let me know as I worked for ASG for 
a short while.
 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Mainframe Mainframe mainframe1...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Mar 6, 2015 5:11 am
Subject: ASG Mainfram Product


Hello Group, I was trying to looking web link to get product and tool
offered
by ASG for Mainframe. But unfortunately, I am not getting any such
link talks
about ASG Mainframe product and atleast use of that product.

Do anybody have
idea on
this.

--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Municipal mainframe practical (what I meant to send)

2015-03-05 Thread Mitch
Hello again:

I am in the U.S. (Central Time Zone), so reach out at your convenience.  I 
recently returned from Australia where I was involved in a government project 
to migrate 20 data centers into 2.  This type of project is not new to us, 
obviously.
 


Regards,

Mitchell R. Mccluhan
Application Modernization Consultant
Digital Modernization Services
254-598-4642 - U.S. office
916-271-6575 - U.S. mobile
916-718-8910 - IBM mobile
04 759 16272 - Australian mobile 
mitc...@us.ibm.com


 

-Original Message-
From: Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 5, 2015 12:01 am
Subject: Re: Municipal mainframe practical (what I meant to send)


Also recommend you contact both the IBM people who chimed in. Not me -- I'm
in
Singapore and may be groggy when you call at your reasonable time. :-)
However,
to give you a few more lines of investigation from afar

1. What are they
running on those Windows-based servers (and on any other
servers)? What sort of
applications (in terms of runtimes, in particular)
and middleware
products?

2. If there are 7 municipalities, and (by implication) 7+ primary
data
centers, are there are also at least 7 secondary (DR) centers? Or is
DR
inadequate?

3. Are the 7 municipalities providing services 7 different
ways -- they
have 7 different applications for substantial the same service, in
other
words? With 7 different application development and/or support teams? Or
do
they have substantial agreement on applications?

The answers to these
questions (and a few others) would be helpful in
trying to understand better
and best alternatives, if
any.


Timothy
Sipples
IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems,
AP/GCG/MEA
E-Mail:
sipp...@sg.ibm.com
--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Municipal mainframe practical (what I meant to send)

2015-03-04 Thread Mitch
 Graham,

I am with the IBM ADI DMS (Digital Modernization Services) group and we do 
this kind of stuff all the time.  Let me know if you want to talk.

 


Mitch McCluhan


 

 

-Original Message-
From: Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Mar 4, 2015 12:41 pm
Subject: Municipal mainframe practical (what I meant to send)


getting old, sent the incomplete one ..

Folks,

This request stems from
serious high order ignorance. Am retired mainframer app developer very upset by
our municipal IT budget ($1M, 40% salaries, 22% computer maintenance), using a
Windows based server farm hardware/software scenario. In our County there are
seven municipalities, likely server farm setups, total IT budget likely $4-7M,
total staff likely 20-25.

a) visualizing our County building as mainframe
home, b) seeing a $75K IBM 114 mainframe out there, c) based on our needs,
guesstimating our mainframe cost might be up to $200K, d) here's my problem ..
software costs ..

I can find no yardstick on vital IBM software $'s. After
that comes a) telecommunications costs, b) off the shelf municipal software
solution, c) inhouse programmers, d) combo of b and c, e) what have I
missed?

Clearly there are tons of unknowns here .. nevertheless .. might it
be a $ practical situation worth pursuing .. a central mainframe for  $5M, 
$2M? .. ballpark .. how much? .. suggest where I start?

Thanks, be
nice
Graham
Hobbs



--
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Municipal mainframe practical (what I meant to send)

2015-03-04 Thread Mitch
 Folks,

Again, if I can be of any assistance, please feel free to contact me.  I can 
help fast track this to the appropriate people.

 


Mitch McCluhan


 

 

-Original Message-
From: Tom Marchant 000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Mar 4, 2015 2:01 pm
Subject: Re: Municipal mainframe practical (what I meant to send)


On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:41:06 -0500, Graham Hobbs wrote:

I can find no
yardstick on vital IBM software $'s.

There was a time when IBM published
their software prices in a book that 
was rather thick and a bit smaller than
an IBM manual, with a yellow cover. 
AFAIK, there is no equivalent any more,
either in hard copy or online. I 
would very much like to get my hands on a
copy, or see one uploaded to 
bitsavers, just for historical reasons. Alas, I
had an opportunity to get a 
copy several years ago and I didn't take
it.

Clearly there are tons of unknowns here .. nevertheless .. might it be a
$ 
practical situation worth pursuing 

IMO, yes, it would be
practical

suggest where I start?

The only option that I can think of is
to ask your local IBM salesman or reseller.
And, BTW, I wouldn't be looking at
a 114, but a BC12. Wait a while, and there will 
presumably be a smaller z13
available.

-- 
Tom
Marchant

 --
For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Folks,

This request stems from serious high order ignorance. Am retired mainframer app
developer very upset by our municipal IT budget ($1M, 40% salaries, 22% 
computer 
maintenance), using a Windows based server farm hardware/software scenario. In 
our County there are seven municipalities, likely server farm setups, total IT 
budget likely $4-7M, total staff likely 20-25.

a) visualizing our County building as mainframe
home, b) seeing a $75K IBM 114 mainframe out there, c) based on our needs,
guesstimating our mainframe cost might be up to $200K, d) here's my problem ..
software costs ..

I can find no yardstick on vital IBM software $'s. After
that comes a) telecommunications costs, b) off the shelf municipal software
solution, c) inhouse programmers, d) combo of b and c, e) what have I
missed?

Clearly there are tons of unknowns here .. nevertheless .. might it
be a $ practical situation worth pursuing .. a central mainframe for  $5M, 
$2M? .. ballpark .. how much? .. suggest where I start?

Thanks, be
nice
Graham
Hobbs 

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

2015-02-13 Thread Mitch
 Charles, (et al):

RES is represented by Marble Computer in North American (Tivoli Associates was 
dropped a couple of years ago).  IBM has global rights to sell a subset of the 
RES Suite around the world.  I do have a relationship with RES in that I have 
translated all of their materials from Italian into American-ized English.  
IN the late 90s, I did help them get into the U.S. Market (and had sold a few 
bits of their tool suite).  As I had mentioned, I have been in the JCL 
management space since 1982 and have sold and/or supported a number of 
automated operations tools (JCL tools, scheduler tools, change management 
tools).

 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Feb 12, 2015 8:49 pm
Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets


I had never heard of RES Suite. I had a little trouble finding it as there is 
some Web browser product with a similar name.

http://www.res-it.com/en/offerta/res-suite/ 

Italian company. It looks like they are represented in the US by 
http://www.tivoliassociates.com/ 

It would appear to me that Mitch worked part time for RES for fifteen years.

(I am not associated with RES in any way. I was just curious about it after all 
of the discussion here and now I'm sharing what I found.)

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mitch
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 6:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

 Shmuel,

It's not a stunt.  It's knowing the JOBLIBs and the scheduler.  From there, the 
RES Suite finds everything automatically.  If all you are looking for is 
production, you don't even need the JOBLIBs as the RES Suite will find those 
from virtually any mainframe scheduler tool.  Someone should check it out (it 
is in use at a number of sites around the world).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

2015-02-13 Thread Mitch
good one.  Love your sense of humor!
 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: J R jayare...@hotmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Feb 13, 2015 10:31 am
Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets


RES Suite is comprised of over 20 complimentary and synergistic products  

So, they're free!  

===


 
 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:11:07 -0800
 From: charl...@mcn.org
 Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 
 Someone should tell Tivoli LOL: http://www.tivoliassociates.com/education 
 
 Charles
  
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

2015-02-13 Thread Mitch
 Everyone,

To clarify, The tool suite in question also understands the jobs run outside 
the scheduler (by analyzing the SMF), and the STC are checked as well.  It is 
essentially an all encompassing solution.
 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Feb 13, 2015 4:29 am
Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets


Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:

How does it determined the DD statements for cataloged procedures without 
information about the relevant JES JCL, JES parms and JES commands. There is 
no way to get those data automatically.

Indeed. You can ask JES something, but reply may or may not be the same as in 
Parmlib member used at initialization.

Now, once the program knows what JES to look at, it can determine the proclib 
configuaration assuming that no subsequent JES commands will change that, but 
that's a big assumption.

Ah, yes, JES commands. I forgot about them. You can add/delete proclibs at will.

Or you can read in a JCL, edit it in memory programmatically, insert a JCLLIB 
ORDER and/or INCLUDE MEMBER and submit the JCL as modified without changing the 
actual stored JCL. No scanner, except in JES or SMF exits, will block this. [1]

Il va sans dir. JOBLIB is totally irrelevant to determining the JCL.

Hehehehe. No one argues with Shmuel.

Good reply, Shmuel! Keep it up!

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

[1] - This trick has been used to insert your own program sitting in a private 
STEPLIB via a 'secret private proclib' to do something bad for your health.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

2015-02-13 Thread Mitch
 the problem obviously was between the chair and the keyboard.

 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Feb 13, 2015 12:00 pm
Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets


You originally wrote complimentary, which in some contexts does mean free 
(of charge or cost).

Perhaps you meant complEmentary instead?

-jc-

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
 Behalf Of Mitch
 Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:44 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets
 
 good one.  Love your sense of humor!
 
 
 
 Mitch
 
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: J R jayare...@hotmail.com
 To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Sent: Fri, Feb 13, 2015 10:31 am
 Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets
 
 
 RES Suite is comprised of over 20 complimentary and synergistic products
 
 So, they're free!
 
 ===
 
 
 
  Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:11:07 -0800
  From: charl...@mcn.org
  Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 
  Someone should tell Tivoli LOL:
  http://www.tivoliassociates.com/education
 
  Charles
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu
 with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu
 with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

**
Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this 
message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately, 
and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any 
other person.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

2015-02-12 Thread Mitch
Everyone,

There are a number of tools that have various levels of XREF capability for 
JCL, but none, I repeat none, can match the RES Suite.  I have supported a 
number and/or competed against JCL tools for the past 33 years.


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Nims,Alva John (Al) (Al) ajn...@ufl.edu
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Feb 12, 2015 3:00 pm
Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets


Take a look at File 270 from the CBTTAPE (cbttape.org) there is something 
called JCLXREF that might get you started.

There is  also FILE 379 that has a procedure to produce several different XREF 
JCL reports, although it looks to be designed to be used against a PROCLIB. 

Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
Information Technology
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

I am looking to see if there are any easy ways to do the following

I have a huge JCL PDS.  I need to list out all members and the datasets they 
use (create/Del/open according to DISP= in JCL) I then need an xref by dsn and 
the jobs (member name = Job name in most cases) that use them

Report 1

Member1   DSN1Create
Member2   DSN1Open
  DSN2Open, Migrate (has a another step that issues the HSM 
Migrate command )
  DSN3Delete
  DSN4(mem) Open   -  Indicates control card input


Report 2
DSN1Member1   Member2
DSN2Member2
DSN3Member2
DSN4(mem)   Member2


Control card Input that affects the DSNx is okay to list - no need to know what 
is in the Control member at this time.

This information is not in a Scheduler package.  So this is just grunt type 
work.

I have a couple of options with REXX and SAS.  But thought if anyone had any 
ideas, I would like to see if there is another way to do this.

I will eventually run SMF data and compare it to these reports to see what is 
actually running or in use.  

I can unload the JCL PDS into an IEBUPDTE file and go from there or use REXX 
with LM functions to read members one at a time.

Thoughts or suggestions always welcomed.


Lizette

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

2015-02-12 Thread Mitch
 Shmuel,

It's not a stunt.  It's knowing the JOBLIBs and the scheduler.  From there, the 
RES Suite finds everything automatically.  If all you are looking for is 
production, you don't even need the JOBLIBs as the RES Suite will find those 
from virtually any mainframe scheduler tool.  Someone should check it out (it 
is in use at a number of sites around the world).



Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Feb 12, 2015 7:58 pm
Subject: Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets


In 14b7e10c0e1-1be5-12...@webprd-a53.mail.aol.com, on 02/12/2015
   at 08:53 AM, Mitch 005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
said:

Actually, you don't need to know the Proclib environment.  The RES
Suite finds the Proclibs automatically.

That would be a good stunt.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

2015-02-12 Thread Mitch
Actually, you don't need to know the Proclib environment.  The RES Suite finds 
the Proclibs automatically.

Mitch



Mitch

On Thursday, February 12, 2015 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) 
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 11632288.1423700546248.javamail.r...@elwamui-cypress.atl.sa.earthlink.net, 
on 02/11/2015 at 05:22 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com said: 
Thoughts or suggestions always welcomed. This has come up before. You need 
toknow the proclib environment. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT 
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. 
We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act 
of 2003) -- 
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets

2015-02-11 Thread Mitch
 Lizette:

Don't waste effort in doing this.  Docet from RES (www.res-it.com) does this 
and more.  And, it gives you the ability to go from the source objects (program 
source) through to what scheduler nets are using files, jobs, procs, programs, 
etc.  It is THE most powerful JCL management solution available, period.  I 
have been involved in the automated operations area since 1982 and can tell you 
without hesitation, Docet will give you everything you need, in a GUI display, 
with selectable capability to go up and down throughout any and all 
relationships.



Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant


 

 

-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Feb 11, 2015 6:22 pm
Subject: XREF Members of JCL libs and their datasets


I am looking to see if there are any easy ways to do the following

I have a huge JCL PDS.  I need to list out all members and the datasets they 
use (create/Del/open according to DISP= in JCL)
I then need an xref by dsn and the jobs (member name = Job name in most cases) 
that use them

Report 1

Member1 DSN1Create
Member2   DSN1Open
  DSN2   Open, Migrate (has a another step that issues the HSM 
Migrate command )
DSN3Delete
  DSN4(mem)   Open   -  Indicates control card input


Report 2
DSN1Member1   Member2
DSN2Member2
DSN3Member2
DSN4(mem)   Member2


Control card Input that affects the DSNx is okay to list - no need to know what 
is in the Control member at this time.

This information is not in a Scheduler package.  So this is just grunt type 
work.

I have a couple of options with REXX and SAS.  But thought if anyone had any 
ideas, I would like to see if there is another way to do this.

I will eventually run SMF data and compare it to these reports to see what is 
actually running or in use.  

I can unload the JCL PDS into an IEBUPDTE file and go from there or use REXX 
with LM functions to read members one at a time.

Thoughts or suggestions always welcomed.


Lizette

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ancient cobol applications

2015-02-07 Thread Mitch
and companies not looking to the future for requirements.  There are 
probably a number of employees in the mid-40s that could be trained and let the 
newbies pick up the LUW support going forward.
 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sat, Feb 7, 2015 2:48 pm
Subject: Re: ancient cobol applications


That's not the only causemanagement being cheap, an issue I have seen
for years...experienced people are worth their weight on 'gold' .

On Saturday, February 7, 2015, Anne  Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com wrote:

 local news just had item about ancient software at state agencies, 619
 major cobol applications developed in 80s ... frequent crashesoutages,
 almost impossible to maintain or change ... in part because of the lack
 of cobol programmers. The state is even considering setting up financial
 incentive for schools to produce cobol programmers.

 --
 virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: submitter restrictions?

2015-01-07 Thread Mitch
Tim (et al):

Is the overall issue to manage submissions from end users, ad hoc users, on 
request job submissions, etc.?
 


Mitch McCluhan,
IBM mainframer from way back


 

 

-Original Message-
From: Tim Hare haresystemssupp...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Jan 7, 2015 10:25 am
Subject: submitter restrictions?


Two topics on job submission

1:  the JES SMF records (I think type 26)  include a submitter ID but _not_ the 
name of the submitting address space.  I've created a SHARE request to add that 
information.. please, if you are a SHARE member read the proposed requirement 
and vote on it. 

2:  I believe in recent JES2 incarnations that internal reader use happens in 
the address space of the submitter.  I am trying to find a method to restrict 
a certain job class to only being used by the production job scheduler.  
2A:  Does a SAF profile exist to protect job class?
2B: If not, is it better to use IEFUJV or a JES exit to restrict this use?

Note that either WHEN(PROGRAM())  or some method of determining the job name of 
the submitter from within the exit has to be used, because of userid 
propagation 
- if the scheduler submits a job that then writes to the internal reader, the 
scheduler-supplied ID is propagated. I am not sure whether PROPCNTL can be used 
to restrict that propagation without ill effect (but will experiment on a test 
partition).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Help please with symbols in a lower-case SET operand

2014-12-14 Thread Mitch
Shmuel,

I am trying to follow what you are asking, but am unsure  Are you saying there 
is something in a JCL environment that should be reported as an error, but it 
is not, until execution?
 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sun, Dec 14, 2014 3:04 pm
Subject: Re: Help please with symbols in a lower-case SET operand


In 6785654506445698.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
12/12/2014
   at 04:46 PM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:

I would be delighted if, rather, the parser reported a reference 
to an undefined apparent symbol as a syntax error.

That would break existing JCL. There seems to be a curious mix of
things that work differently for no good reason aand things that are
consistent with old behaviors whose reasons are no longer relevant.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Ancient IEFUSI

2014-12-09 Thread Mitch

Elardus,

The initial question was about the TIME= Parameter on the JOB card.  I am 
trying to understand why you mentioned the REGION= parameter?  And, if a site 
has a standard that TIME is not allowed on a JOB card, then the solution is to 
remove it and/or flag it and then remove it with a JCL management tool such as 
J-Man.  This can be done for any JCL statement parameter, keyword, 
sub-parameter, value, positional character, entire statements, automatically.  
And, it can be done any time a JCL object is moved into production.


Mitch



-Original Message-
From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 5:30 am
Subject: Re: Ancient IEFUSI


Mitch wrote:
This is all fine a good, but why check when a job is submitted?  Why not check 
efore and eliminate the problem (and potential delay in batch)?
Simply - USI is used to check memory and enforce limits at every job step(s) 
espite stated REGION=value.
IEFUSI exit routines receive control before the initiator checks to determine 
hether the job step will actually execute.
You cannot enforce storage limits before job execution - Only WHILE the thing 
is 
unning.
Groete / Greetings
lardus Engelbrecht
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Ancient IEFUSI

2014-12-08 Thread Mitch

 Everyone:

So, use a tool like J-Man from RES and it will eliminate any job like this from 
ever getting to production.  No more JES exits, and, you can enforce EVERY 
standard AND naming convention for production from ever being a problem.  Issue 
resolved!

 


Mitch

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 8:33 pm
Subject: Re: Ancient IEFUSI


In the past I have used JES2 exit 6 to fail jobs that specify the TIME keyword 
- 
there is a supplied and supported routine XINTKEY that you can $CALL to 
extract specific JCL parameters.

Other methods include using JES2 exit 2/3 or IEFUJV to unconditionally strip 
any 
TIME keyword from JCL statements therefore allowing the jobclass defaults to be 
enforced.



Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Andrew Metcalfe
Sent: 07 December 2014 15:07
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Ancient IEFUSI

One of the reasons our IEFUSI examines the SCTX is to determine whether the 
step 
time (SCTXSTL) differs from the JES2 JOBCLASS setting. If so the assertion is 
that the user has coded TIME= on the EXEC card. IEFUSI sets a bit in the 
CEPUCOM 
area which is interrogated by IEFUTL when deciding whether to grant CPU time 
extension. If the user coded TIME= on the EXEC card he gets the bullet rather 
than an extension.

How might I best determine (in IEFUTL) whether the user coded TIME=, so that I 
can maintain the same behaviour.

Thanks

Andrew


This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the 
addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, 
please 
notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, 
disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free. The 
Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from 
unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by 
any 
third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail 
may 
be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does 
not 
relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is 
not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

Barclays Bank PLC. Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167). 
Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

Barclays Bank PLC is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and 
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation 
Authority (Financial Services Register No. 122702).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ 
+1 
800.966.3270 ■ +1 781.577.4321
Unsubscribe From Commercial Email – unsubscr...@rocketsoftware.com
Manage Your Subscription Preferences - 
http://info.rocketsoftware.com/GlobalSubscriptionManagementEmailFooter_SubscriptionCenter.html
Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy


This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of 
Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket 
Software 
immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Ancient IEFUSI

2014-12-08 Thread Mitch

 Gentlemen,

This is all fine a good, but why check when a job is submitted?  Why not check 
before and eliminate the problem (and potential delay in batch)?

 


Mitch McCluhan,
Modernization Analyst
IBM GBS/AMS/BAM Consultant


 

 

-Original Message-
From: Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 9:51 pm
Subject: Re: Ancient IEFUSI


At 09:32 + on 12/08/2014, Rob Scott wrote about Re: Ancient IEFUSI:

In the past I have used JES2 exit 6 to fail jobs that specify the 
TIME keyword - there is a supplied and supported routine XINTKEY 
that you can $CALL to extract specific JCL parameters.

Other methods include using JES2 exit 2/3 or IEFUJV to 
unconditionally strip any TIME keyword from JCL statements therefore 
allowing the jobclass defaults to be enforced.


These methods show how to detect the use of a TIME parameter in the 
JCL. Based on the way that IEFUSI and IEFUTL are used (as described 
in the quote below) what you can do is set the CEPUCOM flag if you 
see a TIME Parm in IEFUJV. Since you can detect and remove TIME= 
there you can just detect it (leaving it there) and set the flag for 
later checking.


Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew Metcalfe
Sent: 07 December 2014 15:07
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Ancient IEFUSI

One of the reasons our IEFUSI examines the SCTX is to determine 
whether the step time (SCTXSTL) differs from the JES2 JOBCLASS 
setting. If so the assertion is that the user has coded TIME= on the 
EXEC card. IEFUSI sets a bit in the CEPUCOM area which is 
interrogated by IEFUTL when deciding whether to grant CPU time 
extension. If the user coded TIME= on the EXEC card he gets the 
bullet rather than an extension.

How might I best determine (in IEFUTL) whether the user coded TIME=, 
so that I can maintain the same behaviour.

Thanks

Andrew

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IBM Migration Utility

2014-09-28 Thread Mitch

 Gadi:

Good Sunday evening to you.  I work with the IBM Migration group in the U.S. 
and can tell you that there is no problem here.  We have experience in this 
type of migration.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Regards,

 


Mitch McCluhan


 

 

-Original Message-
From: גדי בן אבי gad...@malam.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sun, Sep 28, 2014 5:21 pm
Subject: IBM Migration Utility


Hi,

We are in the process of integrating a customer into our payroll system.
They use CA-Easytrieve extensively, but we do not.

One option to install CA-Easytrieve, and another is to install the IBM 
Migration 
utility.

Does anyone have experience with using IBM Migration utility to replace 
CA-Easytrieve?
Is it a straight forwards migration, or do we have to make changes to the 
CA-Easytrieve sources?

To make matters more interesting, the new customer currently runs under VSE, 
while we use z/OS.

Thanks

Gadi



לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי חברת מלם מערכות בעמ ו/או כל חברת בת ו/או חברה קשורה שלה 
(להלן : החברה) וזכויות החתימה בהן, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, 
מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או 
שמה 
המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף להודעת 
דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין להסתמך 
עליה 
לביצוע פעולה עסקית או משפטית כלשהי.

Please note that in accordance with Malam and/or its subsidiaries (hereinafter 
: 
Malam) regulations and signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or 
representation is binding on the Malam, unless accompanied by a duly signed 
separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the Malam seal.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Vendor Source Code

2014-05-08 Thread Mitch
Dean,

I have worked for vendors that dealt with this.  Typically, a contract addendum 
or stipulation is added so that the vendor software is kept at a 3rd party site 
in escrow.

Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant
www.lcmg.us



-Original Message-
From: Dno snipers5...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, May 8, 2014 1:18 pm
Subject: Vendor Source Code


Hi,
 We're looking to purchase a sw product and our lawyers are looking at the t's 
nd c's to see if we can have the right to their source code. At my previous job 
e did this for BMC, we kept it at IMAR. I guess I never understand why, so I'm 
sking if anyone our there does this and for what reason. If the company went 
ut of business what would the source code do for us? Would we give it to 
nother third party to maintain for us? I appreciate the feedback.
Thanks,
ean
Sent from my iPhone
-
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Vendor Source Code

2014-05-08 Thread Mitch
Mark (et al):

Keep in mind, some ISV tools are proprietary and confidential code.  If it were 
not, competitors would gobble it up and duplicate the functionality, hence, the 
need to keep it secure.

Regards,

Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant
www.lcmg.us



-Original Message-
From: Dno snipers5...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, May 8, 2014 2:26 pm
Subject: Re: Vendor Source Code


Thanks Mark, makes sense.
Dean
Sent from my iPhone
On May 8, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Mark Post mp...@suse.com wrote:
 On 5/8/2014 at 04:18 PM, Dno snipers5...@gmail.com wrote:
 We're looking to purchase a sw product and our lawyers are looking at the t's 
 and c's to see if we can have the right to their source code. At my previous 
 job we did this for BMC, we kept it at IMAR. I guess I never understand why, 
 so I'm asking if anyone our there does this and for what reason. If the 
 company went out of business what would the source code do for us? Would we 
 give it to another third party to maintain for us? I appreciate the feedback.
 
 Most companies do this for products that are supporting business critical 
unctions.  If that's not going to be the case here, then there's no real need 
or escrowing the source.
 
 If it is the case, then you would have ability to keep your business critical 
unction running.  As we're all aware stuff happens at the worst time, say 
uring a CPU upgrade.  You could either maintain the code yourself or paying 
omeone else to do it.  If nothing else, it could buy you time to migrate off 
he product gracefully.
 
 One of the benefits of working for an Open Source company is that we don't 
ave to worry about contract terms like that and neither do our customers.  :)
 
 
 Mark Post
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Vendor Source Code

2014-05-08 Thread Mitch
Mark,

I am very confident you did already understand that.  What I was trying to 
emphasize was the open source is apples and oranges.  I meant no disrespect.

Mitch



-Original Message-
From: Mark Post mp...@suse.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, May 8, 2014 4:41 pm
Subject: Re: Vendor Source Code


 On 5/8/2014 at 06:08 PM, Mitch mitc...@aol.com wrote: 
 Keep in mind, some ISV tools are proprietary and confidential code.  If it 
 were not, competitors would gobble it up and duplicate the functionality, 
 hence, the need to keep it secure.
What makes you think I, or anyone else, didn't already understand that?

ark Post
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Vendor Source Code

2014-05-08 Thread Mitch
Mark:

I absolutely agree.  And for the likes of the larger ISVs, I would guess all of 
their product source code is in escrow and kept up to date.  Maybe not so much 
for the mom and pop software companies, but the big ones, yes.

Mitch McCluhan



-Original Message-
From: Mark Post mp...@suse.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, May 8, 2014 5:15 pm
Subject: Re: Vendor Source Code


 On 5/8/2014 at 06:50 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote: 
 huh, does IBM permit you to buy source or CA ?
Source code escrow is not at all the same as buying the source code from a 
endor.  I would be willing to bet that at least some of IBM's and CA's larger 
ustomers have some source code in escrow.  Think governments and the like.  We 
on't license this product or any of your other products unless you agree to put 
he source code for this particular package in escrow.

ark Post
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Vendor Source Code

2014-05-08 Thread Mitch
Charles,

First, thank you for the debate.  I enjoy and appreciate your insight.  Very 
well stated!

Regarding the case I mentioned, it was not a licensee/user, but a competitor.  
Long story, but not one I feel comfortable going into any further detail about.

Regards,

Mitch



-Original Message-
From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, May 8, 2014 5:45 pm
Subject: Re: Vendor Source Code


 how does your scenario differ from hiring a new programmer and telling him
e has to support an application that has been around for years
Obviously we could invent hypothetical scenarios which were the same or
ifferent. I think it is at least plausible that in your scenario there
ould be some documentation and appropriate tools such as compilers, and
erhaps in-house skills. (Your scenario application is written in COBOL
nd the shop has COBOL programmers; the escrowed application is written in
ORTRAN and there are no FORTRAN skills in-house.) But Yes, best case, your
cenario is similar to identical. But of course there is no preceding
rawn-out court fight and hopefully no crisis (unlike it blew up and we
inally figured out the vendor is out of business).
 they were taken to court by a competitor, and the competitor won the case
Interesting. The competitor must have been a licensee, with an escrow
greement, and the vendor must have breached the support agreement. Unusual
o say the least.
 bankruptcy is typically financially oriented.  Contract language for
real property ...
Bankruptcy is bankruptcy. Software is intellectual property. Bankruptcy
asically trumps contracts. If I were a creditor of a bankrupt software
ompany I would be in court arguing that the source code should be sold to
he highest bidder to help satisfy the software company's debts to me and
thers, not given away due to an executory agreement. What would the court
ay? We would be paying lawyers to find out, wouldn't we? (Meanwhile, the
oor customer's critical processing is still waiting on a bug fix.)
Escrow may work in certain circumstances. I think it is problematic to the
oint of having little benefit. Your mileage may vary.
Charles
-Original Message-
rom: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
ehalf Of Mitch
ent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 5:12 PM
o: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
ubject: Re: Vendor Source Code
Charles,
My first question is this:   how does your scenario differ from hiring a new
rogrammer and telling him he has to support an application that has been
round for years, but none of the previous developers or support staff are
ith the company any longer?  However, your point about what happens if and
hen you do have to get access to the code from a no longer existent vendor.
his is true, but also I would be surprised if any company would put
omething into a production environment without first testing it, whether it
s if the vendor product blows up or something changes in the client's
nvironment.
I represented a vendor (who shall remain unnamed) and a situation happened
here they had their product code in escrow, they were taken to court by a
ompetitor, and the competitor won the case.  The vendor then had to make
heir current version of their product available as per contract.  A end
ser organization should ensure that any escrowed source is always the
atest version as per contract stipulations.
Lastly, bankruptcy is typically financially oriented.  Contract language for
real property is handled differently than financial obligations.  Again,
, unfortunately, learned this first hand.  BTW, IMHO, any vendor that is
orth their salt will keep their  various versions held in escrow up to
ate.
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Is there any MF shop using AWS service?

2014-04-04 Thread Mitch
In mainframe parlance, AWS could stand for Automated Workload Scheduler, such 
as TWS from IBM/Tivoli.

Regards,

Mitch McCluhan



-Original Message-
From: Tsai Laurence ltsai85...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Apr 3, 2014 10:35 pm
Subject: Is there any MF shop using AWS service?


Dears,
s the subject, if your shop using AWS service, what is it? Backup svc?
olution ?
Laurence 蔡宗志 from my HTC
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SHOW HW

2014-03-10 Thread Mitch
Roman,

What are you asking?

Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant



-Original Message-
From: Roman Tureček roman.ture...@centrum.cz
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Mar 10, 2014 9:37 am
Subject: SHOW HW


--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Another reason to hate the time change

2014-03-10 Thread Mitch
John,

Stupid is as stupid does is all I can say.  The type of people you allude to 
will always exist, sadly

Regards,

Mitch



-Original Message-
From: John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Mar 10, 2014 9:59 am
Subject: Another reason to hate the time change


We produce reports on our z/OS CPU utilization. They are reported in local
ime, with a.m. and p.m.. Because apparently only military (and pilots)
nderstand Zulu time. So, twice a year, I must explain why we never seem to
ave any activity on Sunday from 02:00 to 03:00 in the spring, and how we
anage to run so much work on one Sunday from 02:00 to 03:00 in the fall.
he reason, of course, is the stupid time change. 02:00 to 03:00 does not
xist on Spring Forward Sunday, and from 02:00 to 03:00 is a two hour
eriod on Fall Backwards Sunday. And every year, I hear the WTF??? on
onday morning. sigh/
-- 
asn't there something about a PASCAL programmer knowing the value of
verything and the Wirth of nothing?
Maranatha! 
ohn McKown
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Query for Destination z article -- identifying/overcoming mainframe challenges

2014-02-27 Thread Mitch
Shmuel (et al):

That is a benefit to the variety of tools that can capture and associate 
documentation through a relational database solution.  Everything gets moved 
through the development lifecycle as a single grouping or entity.  It can 
capture from a mainframe and/or LUW environment automatically and include 
unrelated file structures into a cohesive grouping for access by anyone.

Regards,

Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant



-Original Message-
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Feb 27, 2014 7:22 pm
Subject: Re: Query for Destination z article -- identifying/overcoming 
mainframe challenges


In 530e5974.8020...@actionsoftware.com, on 02/26/2014
  at 04:15 PM, Gord Tomlin gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com said:
It is worth noting that such a documentation effort should not be
left  to the time when the documentation is needed.
IMHO the documentation is needed before the code goes into production;
hat rarely happens.

- 
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
e don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Query for Destination z article -- identifying/overcoming mainframe challenges

2014-02-26 Thread Mitch
Folks,

There are a number of tools out there that can provide this capability.  I have 
come across a number of them, including Docet from RES (www.res-it.com/en).  
For mainframe sites with DB2, it is an excellent tool for keeping documentation 
(among a plethora of other mainframe inventory and infrastructure information) 
at the fingertips of those who need it.  

Regards,

Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant



-Original Message-
From: Duffy Nightingale, SSPI du...@soundsoftware.us
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Feb 26, 2014 12:53 pm
Subject: Re: Query for Destination z article -- identifying/overcoming 
mainframe challenges


One thing I have run into at a couple of mainframe sites is they have had so
uch turnover in tech support and no process for the ex person to train or
eave the new person documentation that the current tech people (and same
ith application folks) - seem to have no idea how things work! This
robably applies to all mainframe staff positions.  Sites need to have a
rocess in place to save in documentation or spend a couple of weeks with
he new person all the systemic information on apps, system software.

uffy Nightingale
ound Software Printing, Inc.
u...@soundsoftware.us
ww.soundsoftware.us
hone: 360.385.3456
ax: 973.201.8921
The information in this e-mail, and any attachment therein, is
onfidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the
ntended recipient, please return the e-mail to the sender and delete
t from your computer. Although Sound Software Printing, Inc.
ttempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not
uarantee that either are virus-free and accepts no liability for any
amage sustained as a result of viruses.

-Original Message-
rom: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
ehalf Of Gabe Goldberg
ent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 7:44 AM
o: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
ubject: Query for Destination z article -- identifying/overcoming mainframe
hallenges
Challenges are everywhere -- doing more with fewer resources, maintaining
ecurity, management/user sometimes willful ignorance of mainframe
haracteristics and strengths, disrespect (different from
gnorance!) for mainframe heritage and value, staffing (recruiting needed
kills, generation-gap communication, needing to be Swiss-Army experts on
iverse technologies/platforms), system maintenance, managing vendor
ccounting and billing, capacity planning, performance analysis, etc.
OK, that's enough -- and only part of the bad news. What other challenges
re faced? And much more important, what's done (can be done, should be
one) to overcome them all?
As usual, be brief -- this will be a relatively short article. And please
opy to me directly so replies aren't buried in digests.
Thanks...
-- 
abriel Goldberg, Computers and Publishing, Inc.   g...@gabegold.com
401 Silver Maple Place, Falls Church, VA 22042   (703) 204-0433
inkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gabegoldTwitter: GabeG0
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
o lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Query for Destination z article -- identifying/overcoming mainframe challenges

2014-02-26 Thread Mitch
John (et al),

I, in past lives, was an operations analyst, QA analyst, Production Control 
clerk, Production Control Manager and for a while, an Operations Manager.  
Access to information that can be displayed for any and all to see is 
invaluable.  The Docet tool is a relational repository that can display any 
information stored in it on a PC, as a report, via a file, etc., etc.  
Including documentation about existing and/or modified applications must be 
accessible in order to be useful.  Yes, person-to-person handover discussions 
are great and the absolute best form of communication, but what do you do whan 
a staff member retires or resigns and the replacement isn't brought on board 
until after the event?  And, lastly, trust me, Docet is no pedestrian package.

Respectfully,

Mitch McCluhan,
legacy Modernization Consultant

Original Message-
From: John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Feb 26, 2014 7:14 pm
Subject: Re: Query for Destination z article -- identifying/overcoming 
mainframe challenges



There is no substitute for person-to-person handover discussions.
The notion that some 'tool' can replace them is not just dubious; it
s absurd.  Mitch McLuhan needs to rein in his marketing rhetoric.  I,
or one, have no objection to his touting what he has available to
ddress problem A or problem B; but he needs to stop short of
epresenting pedestrian packages as magic bullets.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Why does a dataset that should never migrate does occassionally (hsm)

2014-02-21 Thread Mitch
Michael,

For a quick fix, do you have any of the more popular JCL management tools?  If 
so, there is a way to always ensure the dataset is allocated and available 
before the initial access from your production processing hits it for the first 
time.


Mitch



-Original Message-
From: Michael Bieganski mbiegans...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Feb 21, 2014 8:16 am
Subject: Why does a dataset that should never migrate does occassionally (hsm)


Hi, we have a mainframe dataset that is used daily used in our automated
cheduling processes.
ccassionally, our ops support gets paged out because a process is delayed
nd it turns out it was because
aid dataset was migrated and had to be recalled.
his dataset's management class  has nolimit on expires, and blanks for
Primary Days'
artial Release is 'yes'  so could hsm be migrating this dsn in Primary
pace mgmt, despite we have
rimary-days set to blanks???
nd if so, short of setting partial release to no, how can we keep an sms
anaged dataset from ever migrating at all?
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: P[ro]Ops and Infocenter?

2014-01-22 Thread Mitch
Gil,

What, specifically, are you looking for?

Mitch McCluhan



-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Jan 22, 2014 6:00 pm
Subject: P[ro]Ops and Infocenter?


Is/are the P[ro]Ops available via Infocenter?  Or is Infocenter software only?
'd rather have a web interface to a current copy than several PDFs of varying
ge on the several desktops I use.
-- gil
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Innovating an old IMS 3270-based application

2014-01-06 Thread Mitch
Hello,

One option is to modernize (convert/migrate) the application(s) to a more 
updated environment (Windows  SQL/Server, UNIX  Oracle, etc.).  Through the 
use of a proven automated tool suite set, this can be done via a relatively 
quick and complete process using a vendor I partner with.  If you want to talk 
about this offline, please drop me a private email reply.

Respectfully,

Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant



-Original Message-
From: Sanya Off sanya...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Jan 6, 2014 2:06 pm
Subject: Innovating an old IMS 3270-based application


Folks,
I wonder if some of you may share the experience and opinions with regards
o approaching a grand task of making an old IMS-based monster application
ore friendlier to users and developers:
- users want web-based access;
- developers are limited in their skills (particularly, z/OS skills)
Specifically, I think of using MQ to intercept/separate 3270-bound flow...
ny advice?
I'd be grateful...
A.I.
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Innovating an old IMS 3270-based application

2014-01-06 Thread Mitch
Peter (et al):

I have only one comment in regards to your thoughts (below).  when you say 
projects to move off the mainframe have a high rate of failure, it depends on 
how it is done.  One of the vendors I work with has superior success rates in 
regards to conversion/migration from a mainframe to an LUW environment.

Regards,

Mitch



-Original Message-
From: Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Jan 6, 2014 2:51 pm
Subject: Re: Innovating an old IMS 3270-based application


As usual, it depends on how far forward the original monster application' 
esigners looked (or not...).  If the core business logic is separated from the 
presentation layer (i.e., if the business logic is well separated from the 
270 screen processing logic), it might be possible to directly re-engineer it 
ith an HTML layer in place of the 3270 layer.
If the screen-handling and the business logic are tightly woven together, not 
so 
asy at all.
I have no experience at all with IMS applications, much less with interfacing 
hem to web browsers, but if the business function is well separated from the 
user interaction parts, it should be possible.
Such projects are never easy, though.  Sometimes, unfortunately, the best 
ecision (financially and time-wise) is to start over from scratch.  For a staff 
ith limited z/OS skills, that could result in a project to move completely off 
f z/OS.  Those kinds of projects have a very high rate of failure.
One other possibility is the use of one of the several 3270-to-browser 
onversion products I think are out there, which (if I understand the functions 
rovided) take your 3270 screen inputs and outputs and convert them back and 
orth in a web browser.  Not pretty, and almost certainly affects round-trip 
ime from enter to results screen, but supposedly quite functional.
All I can say is good luck.  You're going to need it.
Peter
-Original Message-
rom: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
f Sanya Off
ent: Monday, January 06, 2014 4:56 PM
o: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
ubject: Innovating an old IMS 3270-based application
Folks,
I wonder if some of you may share the experience and opinions with regards
o approaching a grand task of making an old IMS-based monster application
ore friendlier to users and developers:
- users want web-based access;
- developers are limited in their skills (particularly, z/OS skills)
Specifically, I think of using MQ to intercept/separate 3270-bound flow...
ny advice?
I'd be grateful...
A.I.
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
nd may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
f the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
he intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
ommunication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in 
rror, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
ttachments from your system.
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Literate JCL?

2014-01-05 Thread Mitch
A friend of mine made a comment to me maybe 30 years ago about something 
similar to this subject.  He said the darkest day in the history of computer 
operations was the day when applications programming realized an application 
would run in production with our without documentation.


Mitch McCluhan



-Original Message-
From: Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sat, Jan 4, 2014 8:53 pm
Subject: Re: Literate JCL?


On Jan 4, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
 In 8d0d6ab843cdf6c-15b0-11...@webmail-m245.sysops.aol.com, on
 01/03/2014
at 09:59 AM, Mitch mitc...@aol.com said:

 I will talk with someone at a vendor site that may be able to do
 something close to this.  May I ask for other input from anyone
 else that sees value in this?

 I liked the idea when Knuth first published it, and see no reason that
 it wouldn't work for JCL. The hard part is convincing management that
 documentation needs to be a basic part of development, not an
 afterthought.

 -- 

ot only in the beginning but as part of the change cycle.
Ed
--
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Literate JCL?

2014-01-04 Thread Mitch
I am familiar with this product, and while it has some good features, it is not 
complete for an end to end documentation and cross reference solution.

Mitch



-Original Message-
From: fich...@kabelmail.de
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Jan 3, 2014 7:09 pm
Subject: Literate JCL?



Am 04.01.2014 06:00, schrieb IBM-MAIN automatic digest system:
 Literate JCL?
Hi,
you might also consider a product that I used to watch JCL and to 
monitor the surrounding topics during my last assignment at a Bavarian 
car manufacturer; the product is called XINFO. It scans all JCL as well 
as related software information about datasets, programs, database 
access and stores the information in a DB2 based repository .

Look at: 
http://www-304.ibm.com/partnerworld/gsd/solutiondetails.do?solution=18026lc=en

Note: I'm not affiliated with the company, just a (former) user.
Arthur

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Literate JCL?

2014-01-03 Thread Mitch
Folks,

I will talk with someone at a vendor site that may be able to do something 
close to this.  May I ask for other input from anyone else that sees value in 
this?

Regards,

Mirch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant 


Mitch



-Original Message-
From: john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Jan 3, 2014 1:42 am
Subject: Literate JCL?



We had a discussion on changes we would like to see in JCL. Well, I am
wondering if perhaps what should be embraced in a variation of Knuth's
Literate Programming in which the program source is actually embedded in
the documentation. I am wondering if some JCL documentation company might
consider this to be something as a possibility for a product. This would
combine and centralize the maintenance of the JCL with the documentation
for the job.

Combining this with the DCF thread, how about something like DCF's GML
which could be run through some program. One DD would output the JCL, such
as could be sent to the internal reader. Another DD would contain formatted
text, such as AFP or PDF output. Might even be nice if this vendor program
could be written so that a scheduler program, such as CA-7, could use it as
a preprocessor for jobs that it submits. This would be so that the CA-7
JCL library would contain the Literate JCL and be able to directly
submit it. Of course, said vendor product should also be able to do a JCL
syntax scan to detect syntactic JCL errors.

Just a wacked out thought for the new year.

ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literate_programming

-- 
This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
hunchbacks.

Maranatha! 
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


  1   2   >