Provantage.com - $296.88 for Unlimited One Year Serv. Agreement
-Mark McDonald
Siteserver Account Executive
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 800.610.9856 Ext 231
Cell: 805.857.5614
Fax: 888.333.2710
-Original Message-
From: Joe Wolf / CompuSystems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Encryption.
nope, even if 90% of users could figure out to unencrypt the encrypted
mail, they could still forward the cleartext.
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4 W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail
If you really want to stop this at the server side, I think you can change
the SMTP Welcome Message to take out the ESMTP announcement. I believe
this would effectively disable the ability to request delivery notifications
I think it will also preclude SMTP AUTH, which most Imail servers
This might seem strange but I was having issues with a small mailing list
last week where random addresses would not receive the list. I increased
the timeout for the DNS service on my Proxy Server
interesting, from what timeout to what timeout ?
and lowered the the # users from 25 to 20
I've got 2 server with about 250 domains on them with IPs for imail.
lately imail smtp says it's working but just fails to send anything. I
could be your DNS is down, or access to you DNS is flaky
what´s in the imail logs?
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com :
I've got 2 server with about 250 domains on them with IPs for imail. lately
imail smtp says it's working but just fails to send anything. If i reboot
it usually fixes it temporarly. I can't understand this, and it is sooo
frustrating. please help
help us help you. what OS, hardware, Imail
If he can't force the recipients to use a custom MUA or MUA plugin (like
Zixit's or Disappearing E-Mail), he's obviously going to be delivering mail
to an app that supports cut-and-paste, like...oh, every major mail
program. There's no technical way to stop people from forwarding messages
If i may be of some assistance in clearing the air on this topic.
Here
is a copy of the Imail Product Summary, that the folks in sales sent me.
The original document was done in MS Word and was to large to post to this
list.
Thanks Kevin!
I am somewhat dissapointed in even this list as
I could not read all the mail (sorry, it's so large and english is not my
native languaje [I'm at work ;-]), but I've seen only two opinions, and all
about law. One is the spirit, and other the letter. And from another point
of view, one is the boss, and another the worker.
Have anybody
I apprecaite you briging this up. I thought we did not need to since we keep
Index Service disabled. However even if you do not use the Index server you
are still vulnerable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Hornbaker
Sent: Monday,
I am somewhat dissapointed in even this list as I know a LOT of the items
discussed over the last year or so were not addressed in the message.
that´s why I asked for a list of features in IMail6 that have been modified
in IMail7.
1. External DB support for mailall.exe (or a better
Does anyone know what this means it is the email
address of a valid alias within Imail
20010619 084541 AUTH ERROR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
192.168.0.13 0 - failed authentication
It happens every time I try to send from webmail to
any account even one in the same domain within imail, but I can
Have subscribed to this list for a few years now, but do not remember if
this question was ever asked/answered in detail. In any event, here is my
situation.
I have several servers co-located at the facilities of a local ISP, one of
which happens to be my IMail server. Due to my state's habit of
On 6/18/01, Mark McDonald penned:
Provantage.com - $296.88 for Unlimited One Year Serv. Agreement
Out of Stock Items: Occasionally, the price may change on an
out-of-stock item due to an unexpected cost increase. If this
happens, we will contact you to ask if you want to continue your
order
Thanks again.
Thought in a previouse message a user said We added our own encryption
functions with VB with a
moderate amount of effort as well as implementing load balacing.
So thats why I would think it's possible to use VB
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On 6/18/01, Mark McDonald penned:
Provantage.com - $296.88 for Unlimited One Year Serv. Agreement
Not in stock. How can a Service Agreement not be in stock? :)
--
Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development
1. In the HOSTS file on the backup machine, IPswitch gives an example
listing of
123.123.123.123 thedomain_name.com
Shouldn't all addresses in this file be FQDN's?
yes, you don´t want any ambiguity
2. I have numerous domains pointing to a single IP address on my IMail
server, since they are
If you're an ISP, use Declude or IMGate. We purchased
VirusWall, and in an ISP setting there simply
isn't a way to lock your SMTP processes down to prevent
relaying and spamming.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Luke Skidmore
Sent:
Does IMail have a provision to automatically send out a customized WELCOME
email for an email account which is just added as new?
Keith Broshears
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.airNwire.com
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of
We are considering TM VirusWall
I recommend that you instead consider IMGate for your anti-abuse mail hub,
and Declude AV on IMail. Much more flexible, robust, and scaleable than a
one box solution, and cheaper, too.
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC
Thanks, Rod. What I'm looking for is a way to have client Outlook Express
and Outlook machines use a single, up-to-the minute email (and optionally
telephone) directory, so I don't have to distribute a new list to each
client every time one address changes. I know it can be done with exchange,
It is possible to use VB, once compiled it is no different than the C
version
as long as you use the appropriate functions and params that IMail is
looking
for when it calls the DLL.
Jeff Reinhardt
XFire Software XFire Web
__
http://www.xfireweb.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
see?! they're just biased against us piano players (dey're jist jealous) .
sneaky string types are just as off topic and get away with moida ova heah.
sniffle
|
| and lowered the the # users from 25 to 20 and viola!
|
| You´re taking up the viola? (damn furrin diphthongs!)
|
| Everyone is
service agreements are serial numbered, come in a bar coded package. really
professional, ag# right at the top, you don't have to go fishing for it.
best spent money is on service agreements, as long as they really serve.
- Original Message -
From: Bud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Hi Lee,
Unfortunately, I agree with your assessment of this upgrade issue.
What a wonderful opportunity for Imail to be magnanamous is some way,
instead of being greedy.
We all know this this business is about the money, but the double
dipping is over the top. I have an unlimited license with
Do these other companies provide good support? Are there hours also limited?
We've had terrible luck with the IPSwitch support and might be willing to
try one of these other companies.
bk
.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Clearly you've managed this but there is a big difference between a VB dll
and non COM C++ dll, in particular in the VB version I didn't think it
exported the functions (apart from the COM queryinterface type stuff) Do you
have compile with any special options? Does it work under load i.e.
I noticed this in my log file numerous times, can anybody explain this? It
only happens when they send mail to fricko.com?
THanks,
Kris McElroy
20010618 063701 127.0.0.1 SMTP (484) 220
**2*0*02*0*0**200**0
***2*0*00
I just made a change to my IMail server. It is setup with W2k sp2 with 2 nics. The
machine is now connected to the internet via a DMZ and has restricted access to our
internal network via one nic card. The other nic card has full access to our internal
network but no access to the internet.
20010618 063701 127.0.0.1 SMTP (484) 220
**2*0*02*0*0**200**0
***2*0*00
a firewall or proxy answering your call to its smtp port
20010618 063701 127.0.0.1 SMTP (484) EHLO mail.compworldnet.com
20010618 063701
Unlimited Users - CDW - $348 - Ships in 4-5 days.
David
- Original Message -
From: Brad Kingsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 7.0 Upgrade Confusion
Do these other companies provide good support?
I noticed this in my log file numerous times, can anybody explain this? It
only happens when they send mail to fricko.com?
20010618 063701 127.0.0.1 SMTP (484) 220
**2*0*02*0*0**200**0
***2*0*00
This is a sign of a FUBAR
Does Ipswitch pay attention to what their customers say?
Thanks, andyb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, June 19, 2001, 10:57:19 AM, you wrote:
BK Do these other companies provide good support? Are there hours also limited?
BK We've had terrible luck with the IPSwitch support and might be willing to
Chris,
Did you hack the registry and change the 'Max Recipients per message'? That
could give these symptoms.
Daniel Donnelly
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18,
Title: can't send mail to AOL accounts
I am not able to send mails to aol accounts, I am running Imail server 6.04.Can anybody suggest any solution.
Does Ipswitch pay attention to what their customers say?
Way back in version 3 days I would have given an enthusiastic yes. But
lately Ipswitch seems to be distant and trying to act bigger than they
really are. Un-answered email and vague answers abound (v7 announcement as
exhibit A).
Last
Title: can't send mail to AOL accounts
Hi,
Check
you smtp logs first and see what or if there is a response from AOL's mail
servers
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Prasad
KannegantiSent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:50 PMTo:
I am not able to send mails to aol accounts, I am running Imail server
6.04.Can anybody suggest any solution.
Go to http://postmaster.info.aol.com. It looks like they may have
blacklisted your mail server.
-Scott
Declude:
Hi all
I like to add a page between login and menu page like the below page.
http://paco.epasito.com/Email/html/emailhome.htm
Basically the page is with a images linked to
inbox,compose,addressbook,etc..
I am looking for suggestions to replace with the mailnews page. Any
suggestions would be
... vague answers abound (v7 announcement as exhibit A).
FYI, we have been released from our NDA about the IMail 7.0 beta, and can
answer questions.
-Scott
Declude: Anti-virus, Anti-spam and Anti-hijacking solutions for
IMail.
It doesn't matter, I asked them about it. As long as you have a receipt
from the purchase date, you're good to go.
-Mark McDonald
Siteserver Account Executive
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 800.610.9856 Ext 231
Cell: 805.857.5614
Fax: 888.333.2710
-Original Message-
From: Bud
I posted this earlier but made the mistake of not starting a new thread
I just made a change to my IMail server. It is setup with W2k sp2 with 2 nics. The
machine is now connected to the internet via a DMZ and has restricted access to our
internal network via one nic card. The other nic
They're still IPSwitch support contracts, all support is still done
through IPSwitch. But yes, I agree. We have 6-10 unanswered messages
from them. I think they just hit the DEL key when they come in. With
IPSwitch you buy the agreement for updates, don't count on their
support.
-Mark
Two things...
1. Microsoft has a command line utility to allow you to apply multiple
security
patches in one pass, without rebooting between each!
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?ReleaseID=29821
2. Also, for those not following, you can get a list of all of the
critical
what does the calendar functionality look like?
I assume that Declude will support v7.0?
regards
Chris Bone
Web Engineer
Chartway Federal Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/19/01 02:33PM
... vague answers abound (v7 announcement as exhibit A).
FYI, we have been released from our NDA
We provide ISP sevices to a local office of a company that has their
corporate email hosted elsewhere. Because of port 25 blocking, we set up
SMTP accounts for them on our mail server (Imail 5.08). Since last week we
had some very stange occurances for this client only. When they try to send
Ron,
Just checking on some basics, so all this is good info. More relative, might
be the hostname and IP address along with the name and password of a user
account. With that, I (and others) can test.
I don't know of any reason for a system to respond as you suggest, except a
major
They are all selling IPSwitch support.
Just as they resell the boxed software product, they can also sell
the boxed service contract. But the service contract is still with IPSwitch
and you will call them for your support needs.
At 10:57 AM 6/19/2001, you wrote:
Do these other companies
I am getting an error 501 when trying to send read confirmation e-mails
using Outlook 2000 and IMail 6.0.6. Any thoughts?
Robert S. Galloway
Chief Network Security Engineer
IKANO Communications
...the Internet branding company
Official Data Networking Services Provider for the
Salt Lake Olympic
OK, you asked for it...
1: Any movement on the IMAP disappearing mail issues ?
2: How is WebMail implemented? Still tied to a single server? Still use
built-in http server? Can it bind to individual IPs?
3: TLS/SSL support?
4: Is remote admin support any better - can iAdmin, etc be run from
We can second that!
bk
.
- Original Message -
From: Mark McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:48 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 7.0 Upgrade Confusion
They're still IPSwitch support contracts, all support is still done
through
Hi Daniel,
Can you send out the release notes for IMail v7 yet?
-Mark McDonald
Siteserver Account Executive
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 800.610.9856 Ext 231
Cell: 805.857.5614
Fax: 888.333.2710
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Donnelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
What should my queue timer for SMTP be set at i've got 255 ip hosts on this
box if i set it to 30 on this queue time will it lower the load some?
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Schick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail
It would just be nice if the web mail could run on either... and better yet
on a seperate box... undre any web server...
d
- Original Message -
From: Dan Shadix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail Server
An number of our users like to forward mail to other addresses. To prevent
loss of email I have advised users to use the
.,[EMAIL PROTECTED] format to maintain a copy in their inbox for backup
reasons. Is their a way to make this the default behaviour when a user
forwards email? or better yet
I'll go along with that, especially if Apache is included in any web
server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of :: d u s t i n
::
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 7.0
Like ASP :)
-Mark McDonald
Siteserver Account Executive
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 800.610.9856 Ext 231
Cell: 805.857.5614
Fax: 888.333.2710
-Original Message-
From: :: d u s t i n :: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*cough cough* QMAIL *cough cough*
After many many fights with Ipswitch about problems with iMail, with little to no
resolutions, I am switching our mail server that is running iMail out with a server
running qmail as rapidly as I can safely do so. I can duplicate EVERYTHING that iMail
does
I purchased mine from Whalley Computer Associates (508) 478-5174
My sales person Adam and his assistant Sue got me the unlimited service
agreement for $349 in two days.
Great person to deal with.
- Original Message -
From: David Setzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
So, who makes good mail software?
We are strongly considering MailMax from SmartMax.com. COMPLETELY database
driven.
The features are great. I did a vast search of USENET and it appears good.
The user base is small and there is no email list though.
I'm starting an extended 60 day evaluation
Good god, so basically they're just charging for bug fixes. Lovely.
So, who makes good mail software?
-Mark McDonald
Siteserver Account Executive
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 800.610.9856 Ext 231
Cell: 805.857.5614
Fax: 888.333.2710
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry
We are getting a number of stack connect failures to hotmail.com and
yahoo.com.
Is anyone else running into this problem???
For hotmail the ip's are 64.4.52.7,64.4.45.7.
Yahoo.com is 216.115.108.243, 64.4.43.7.
Yesterday between 1:00pm and 2:00pm CDT (6/18) all emails bounced off of
I trust Ipswitch much more than I do Microsoft.
That's scary!
bk
.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Shadix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:31 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 7.0 Upgrade Confusion
I'd prefer that it not run on
Hi Scott,
I'm simply being sarcastic. IPSwitch is raising the licensing
prices for the Unlimited version (Which 99.99% of the time is used for
ISPs), yet leaves us no way of remotely configuring the IMail servers
*automatically* (Via command line scripts). The remote administration
is
what does the calendar functionality look like?
It's cool. G It's a fully functional web-based calendaring system. I
haven't used other web calenders, so I don't have anything to compare it
to. You can set up appointments, meetings, etc. ; you can have multiple
calendars, tasks,
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] A tricky moral problem
All,
I know the original poster seems to have moved on,
No, I'm still here, but a mountain of work, moving house
Are attachment capabilities better in v7 in webmail?
Haven't fully tested that yet, sorry. With the myriad of email client
configurations and encoding methods, that's a very difficult feature to
ever completely test. If you have an attachment file (small, please) and
client config that reliably
You are buying a service contact WITH ipswitch THROUGH another company. It is still
ipswitch support.
-- Original Message --
From: Brad Kingsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:57:19 -0400
Do these other
- Original Message -
From: Mark McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or POP before SMTP, nearly every mail product out there has it.
What does this mean?
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
I've had my Rodopi billing server setting up accounts on my Imail machine
remotely for several years. You can either use program aliases (I did this
for a while) or quite a few people simply open up a directly via FTP - have
your billing/account creation machine ftp the needed data to that
How is it scary?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brad Kingsley
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 7.0 Upgrade Confusion
I trust Ipswitch much more than I do
Jack Taugher wrote:
From: Mark McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or POP before SMTP, nearly every mail product out there has it.
What does this mean?
It's a kludge where the server 'remembers' the IP address (for some
small period of time) that POP requests come in on and if SMTP sees
a relay
We are getting a number of stack connect failures to hotmail.com and
yahoo.com.
Is anyone else running into this problem???
For hotmail the ip's are 64.4.52.7,64.4.45.7.
Yahoo.com is 216.115.108.243, 64.4.43.7. I am sure there are others.
Yesterday between 1:00pm and 2:00pm CDT (6/18) all
You should subscribe to get warnings straight from ms. They sent this out yesterday.
-- Original Message --
From: Susan Metre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:43:31 -0400
I apprecaite you briging this up. I
Does the fact that Imail 7.0 is using the iCal standard allow Outlook to
interact with it?
Thanks,
Evans Martin
-
Martek Computer Co. http://www.martek.net
Evans Martin, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3102
Chances are Verio's DNS servers are screwing up. You should really put your
own primary DNS server online, and use Verio only as a secondary. If you
can afford to be your own primary and secondary DNS that's what I would do.
Verio is just not dependable.
- Original Message -
From:
you could create a batch file that would find the forward.ima files and then have a
batch edit tool add the ., to each of the entries.
There are tools available to do string manipulation via batch files.
check fireflysoftware.com
definatly doable this way. Then schedule the batch nightly...
Does the fact that Imail 7.0 is using the iCal standard allow Outlook to
interact with it?
Don't know, sorry. The docs say this:
IMail Web Calendaring is based on the ICAL standard. Because of
this, users can import and export information to any ICAL compliant
client. Recipients can then
We had issues with SMTP-Auth for over a year and could barely get a phone
call returned from the support staff. Trusting a company with
software/service like that is scary.
bk
.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Shadix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001
Chuck,
Typically, it is the MTU of the first 'router' or the sending computer, that
is the trouble. I'm not an expert on fixing this, by any stretch of the
imagination (actually did that part, only once, on one PC!), but I have seen
this enough times, to recognize the symptoms ('unreliable'
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 7:51 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A tricky moral problem
huge snips
Senate hearings
Federal courts.
Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family
Medical Leave Act
Actually, Len, I think my logic was flawed from the outset (at least I
admitted that I didn't have a test server to try it out on ;). Closer
reading of RFC 1869 shows me that the welcome message (220 response) on an
ESMTP server isn't actually required to have the string with ESMTP--but
all
Hi Scott,
AWESOME!!! Here's my list of questions:
Better DB Support (Full DB Support)?
Remote COMMAND LINE administration?
ETRN support that works?
Does it support, and I'm not sure what the official name of this
feature is, but where a user
actually (gulp) we used C++, but it was part of a wider Visual Studio
project which included some other VB ODBC modules. So it is C++ that is
required.
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 June 2001 5:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Or PHP or anything else preferably something non platform dependant.
Dustin
- Original Message -
From: Mark McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:03 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 7.0 Upgrade Confusion
Like ASP :)
Dan,
That's true, US laws do not apply directly to the rest of the world, but
the industrialized countries have been exchanging guidelines for privacy
for the past decade, and the US' are overall the *most* restrictive of
employees' rights, so they serve as a relevant baseline. I do not have
- Original Message -
From: andyb@thumpernet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:27 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Upgrade question
Hi Lee,
Unfortunately, I agree with your assessment of this upgrade issue.
What a wonderful opportunity for Imail
It's offensive to be asked for more money after
spending the money within the last 4 months to buy what I have.
i thought that having a valid service agreement (OR being within the 60 day
grace period) entitles you to a free upgrade to v7. if i'm wrong in this,
please let me know, but
P.S. Add'l caveat: Netscape brags that Messenger sends RFC 1891-94 DSN
*and* MDN requests, unlike Outlook, Eudora, and OE. So if someone's using
Netscape and asks for a DSN (not an MDN), since my original hypothesis
about 220/250 responses was wrong, Imail would respond
accurately.
Hi R.,
Yes, that is correct...being asked for more money when I'm already *not*
getting what has already been paid for..
I can see much sense in letting Ipswitch use more of my money for 7 or 8
months (by extending the contract).
I'm struggling with paying for a service contract at all based
Absolutly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rudy Pieruccini
Sent: Martes, 19 de Junio de 2001 02:20 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RES: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 7.0 Upgrade Confusion
Hi people!
Has Ipswitch anounced how
Hi people!
Has Ipswitch anounced how much is v7.0 gonna cost? regardless of service
agreement.
Don't recent imail 6.06 customers have the rigth to an upgrade?
I think they do...
Regards
Rudy Pieruccini
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Em nome de
Hello,
Thats what I thought.
If possible can you or some one who has done it provide me a code sample.
Like the base of the dll so that I can see what I might be doign wrong.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Reinhardt
Provantage, $296.88
-Mark McDonald
Siteserver Account Executive
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 800.610.9856 Ext 231
Cell: 805.857.5614
Fax: 888.333.2710
-Original Message-
From: David Setzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are getting a number of stack connect failures to hotmail.com and
yahoo.com. Is anyone else running into this problem???
For hotmail the ip's are 64.4.52.7,64.4.45.7.
Yahoo.com is 216.115.108.243, 64.4.43.7.
I just tried one, and couldn't reach it either. Problems with reaching
yahoo.com
Did anyone else get a completely empry email from
list.ipswitch no "From" no "Subject" and no "Content" ?
I just did !
randomly, about every 6 weeks or so, this appears to
happen
i suspect they are checking validity of email addresses subscribed to
their lists
-Original Message-From: MIke Mckay
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 20 June 2001 1:32
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Or POP before SMTP, nearly every mail product out there has it.
What does this mean?
If the user checks their POP3 email and then immediately sends new email
through SMTP the server recognizes that it's the same (already
authenticated) user and doesn't require SPA.
~Brad
-Original
Scott,
Thanks for the info on DSNs being a non-worry. So would you agree that
MDNs could be trapped by the Info Manager, making Laura's problem go away?
Sandy
At 10:01 PM 6/19/2001, you wrote:
P.S. Add'l caveat: Netscape brags that Messenger sends RFC 1891-94 DSN
*and* MDN requests,
Kris McElroy wrote:
I noticed this in my log file numerous times, can anybody explain this? It
only happens when they send mail to fricko.com?
20010618 063701 127.0.0.1 SMTP (484) 220 ** etc. 200**0***2*0*00
This usually indicates they've got a firewall 'editing' the
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
