I'm just running 'all', and am not connecting to anything.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 01:12 AM, Stephen Coy wrote:
As in just running the all config, or are you actually clustering
with something else?
Running all certainly works in 3.2 - I've not tried HEAD in a while.
In fact,
Bugs item #714240, was opened at 2003-04-03 00:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=714240group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: tim kitchens (tkitchens)
Assigned to:
On 2003.04.03 07:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
torsdagen den 3 april 2003 kl 07.32 skrev David Jencks:
I'm not sure what your point is, Victor. The exceptions Scott saw
were a
result of a change I made in the last few days to improve the shutdown
behavior of the pools, something I've
This has never happened to me, and I have done some (extremely informal)
clustering tests by (accidentally) running all on a network with other
jboss's running. I still haven't upgraded jdk's however, still on
1.4.1dp10.
david jencks
On 2003.04.03 02:36 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'm just running
Hi,
I've tried since last night (the night of April 2, 2002) to download JBoss
3.0.6. The sourceforge page here:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jboss/jboss-3.0.6.zip?download
fails to start the download after I select a proper mirror.
Anyone else see this?
--
Le
Patches item #714762, was opened at 2003-04-03 17:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=714762group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob Dickinson (rob_dickinson)
Assigned
Where is the attached file?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of SourceForge.net
Sent: jeudi, 3. avril 2003 19:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-714762 ] Adding
Instrumentation Processing Support to JBoss
Is there are particular reason JBoss ships with what appears to be the
almost 2 year old JDOM b7, instead of the 'current' (about a year old)
b8? I've done a search through the mailing lists and couldn't find any
reference to this.
Upgrading the version in /lib to b8 seems to resolve the
Guys,
We are thinking a lot about the forthcoming JB4 release. It is a truly
exciting step for us as we believe we will bring a programming style,
whose time has come, to a mass audience.
AOP as Bill says is a clear wave for system level services on par with
OOP. On top of it and also as a
I think you are delusional if you think JB4 will be ready for JavaOne.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 02:47 PM, marc fleury wrote:
Guys,
We are thinking a lot about the forthcoming JB4 release. It is a truly
exciting step for us as we believe we will bring a programming style,
whose
Its not working for me on a 2x500 G4.
12:42:37,014 INFO [Server] Starting General Purpose Architecture (GPA)...
12:42:38,034 INFO [ServerInfo] Java version: 1.4.1_01,Apple Computer, Inc.
12:42:38,035 INFO [ServerInfo] Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.4.1_01-14,Apple
Computer, Inc.
Hey that is my code
Is it not even starting for you? I can remove the ObjectCopier service
until I figure out why it is hanging? I don't see why this would
effect shutdown. Does this happen when you run the default
configuration.
Is it a problem to reference awt classes like Color
I've seen the hang sometimes on UFS filesystems, but why the heck is
java.awt.Color being loaded in the first place!?
On Thursday, Apr 3, 2003, at 12:58 US/Pacific, Scott M Stark wrote:
Its not working for me on a 2x500 G4.
12:42:37,014 INFO [Server] Starting General Purpose Architecture
There's already a lot we can release.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I think you are delusional if you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I think you are delusional if you think JB4 will be ready for
Bugs item #706494, was opened at 2003-03-19 12:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=706494group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dan Ciarniello (dciarnie)
Ok then there are 4 weeks to get the new stuff done?
Marc, Bill, sure we could do a release but what difference would it
make if the new features are not in it. Is this a release just to show
off AOP? What about any of the other new stuff?
Just give the users a solid 3.2 and they will be
It will be ready and stable. Functionality freeze is May 5th. What
functionality doesn't make it by then will be left out of the release.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To:
Those Apple guys are just too big of GUI freaks I guess. This is even over an ssh
session so it was not even like I was on the console.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Reich [EMAIL
I updated the Oswego util.concurrent jar in 3.0+ from the rather ancient 1.3.0
version to 1.3.2 as we found some serious concurrency failures in the
ConcurrentHashMap and ConcurrentReaderHashMap classes in looking into
some JMS load test failures. A bit ironic that the concurrent package was
I'll comment out the AWT stuff. All the copiers are hard coded right
now, but when I add the configuration code, I'll just have the AWT
stuff commented out and if someone wants them they can turn them on.
I'm still not sure that you are seeing the same problem I am, because
the server boots
The default config fails in the same way. Deployment appears message up in main
as I see the jboss.jar being deployed multiple times. Why are we copying any JDK
classes?
14:07:44,356 INFO [SARDeployer] looking for nested deployments in :
JBoss Remoting
AOP + tx, security, versioning, remoting, clustering, txlock, caching
DTM (waiting on David's response)
EMB (Enterprise Media Beans)
JUDDI integration
If I can get it done: AOP + EJB (packaged extensions to EJB)
and don't forget Nukes!
Anybody got anything to add to this list?
What J2EE specification version are you planning to support in JBoss 4.0? J2EE 1.4 is
not final as far as I know...
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net
Subject: [JBoss-dev]
Please remember that using AWT/Swing classes will load a whole bunch of
native libraries on most platforms, which increases the memory
footprint. It might also not work on headless machines or on regular
machines when nobody is logged in, depending on the OS.
On Thursday, Apr 3, 2003, at 14:07
BB JBoss Remoting
BB AOP + tx, security, versioning, remoting, clustering, txlock, caching
BB DTM (waiting on David's response)
BB EMB (Enterprise Media Beans)
BB JUDDI integration
BB If I can get it done: AOP + EJB (packaged extensions to EJB)
BB and don't forget Nukes!
I would be pleased to
Bugs item #714934, was opened at 2003-04-03 22:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=714934group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dorothy Gantenbein (dgantenbein)
Assigned to:
1.3 Some 1.4 stuff will probably sneek in though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Igor
Fedorenko
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
What J2EE specification
It is supposed to work fine on JDK 1.4 which is required for JB4.
Anyway, I have commented out support for copying them.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 04:28 PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
Please remember that using AWT/Swing classes will load a whole bunch
of native libraries on most
Can you elaborate on the bugs found in the old package ?
Thanks,
Yonatan.
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Oswego util.concurrent jar updated
I updated the Oswego
I agree that there is some great stuff in there already. However, being
that the AOP transaction, security, remoting, etc. was only recently
released in its first iteration, and the fact that JBoss remoting
doesn't yet support true callbacks (Jeff says it is coming) there is
simply no way I can
I don't think we can support J2EE 1.4 for the DR1 release unless
someone gets in and makes whatever changes are required to get our
metadata classes to support the XML schemas used in J2EE 1.4.
Besides meta data are there other big things in J2EE 1.4 that we
haven't addressed yet?
-dain
On
Any chance they'll ever update the package name to get rid of the
capital EDU... drives me crazy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott M Stark
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Oswego
Persistence will not be done.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 04:27 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
JBoss Remoting
AOP + tx, security, versioning, remoting, clustering, txlock, caching
DTM (waiting on David's response)
EMB (Enterprise Media Beans)
JUDDI integration
If I can get it done: AOP + EJB
1.3 with ongoing development for 1.4
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Igor Fedorenko
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
What J2EE specification
I'm ok with JMS. I didn't think you could rewrite in such short of time.
Especially with Remoting and AOP just now becoming stable. I think this
email thread is good because it will allow us to determine whether or not we
can release. I still think there is enough functionality.
Bill
LOL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Oswego util.concurrent jar updated
I updated the Oswego util.concurrent jar in 3.0+ from the
Bill Burke wrote:
I'm ok with JMS. I didn't think you could rewrite in such short of time.
Especially with Remoting and AOP just now becoming stable. I think this
email thread is good because it will allow us to determine whether or
not we
can release. I still think there is enough
It does not work:
ConcurrentHashMap map = ...;
Object x = ...;
map.put(x, x);
Object y = map.remove(x);
assert( y != null ) fails sporadically
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
DR1 is a showcase for the geralized services architecture. Its not a showcase for
J2EE 1.4 views of these services as this will be built on top of the core. Having
the HTTP IL in these release is irrelevant. I'm not porting the RMI/HTTP invokers
until the remoting, pooling, proxy+interceptor
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 05:26 PM, Bela Ban wrote:
3. [Jeremy, Dain] Integration of the cache into the
PersistenceManager. The first version will have the
PersistenceManager use the Cache as a replicated in-memory cache.
Our use case will initially be shared DB, so all
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our need for caching is very different from what the
other two, so I don't think that it can be done in
parallel as it requires some very
things in the implementation. I'm still not
convinced that we don't
need a completely different cache
Bugs item #676799, was opened at 2003-01-29 06:31
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=676799group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Kuehnel (skuehnel)
Hi,
I have created an Entity EJB that maps to a table with a compound PK
(both columns are NOT NULL). One of the columns of the PK is a FK to
another table representing the many side of a 1-* relationship. Using
XDoclet, I can generate what appears to be the proper source and
deployment
Jboss Remoting callbacks are in - I wil commit in the next day or so
when tom and I finish testing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1
Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 3-April-2003\n\n
begin 644 TESTS-TestSuites.txt
M#0H-DI;W-S(1A:6QY('1EW0@F5S=6QTPT*#0I354U-05)9#0H-DYU
M;6)EB!O9B!T97-TR!R=6XZ( @,3 Y. T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I3=6-C97-S9G5L('1E
MW1S.B @(
Bugs item #713352, was opened at 2003-04-01 06:29
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713352group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Boocock (boocockp)
Assigned to:
Did you guys end up doing it in such a way so that you can use one
protocol one way and another protocol the other way like you had
mentioned?
Secondly, what is really going to be cool when we expose this via AOP
remoting... Bill, what are your plans for that?
Thanks,
Nathan
-Original
3.2 works fine on the same box/JDK. I'm clustering web sessions just fine.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03,
We haven't added the different protocols, but that should be easy enough
to do and a great idea.
I sent bill a note tonight about doing a generic AOP remoting
event/listener framework for POJOs. My thought is using generic
JavaBean style java.util.EventListener/java.util.EventObject (or bounded
by the time they're through JSR..?
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Nathan Phelps wrote:
Any chance they'll ever update the package name to get rid of the
capital EDU... drives me crazy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott M Stark
Sent:
Until 26th of May, I will have a version of W2EE deployment ready (at least
the subset of the
webservices.xml and jaxrpc-mapping.xml that can be easily mapped via a
XSL-driven WebServiceDeployer to the existing web-service.xml/AxisService;
deployer hooks in
Jeff made the fix last night and I have not looked at the code yet (he still
has it local while we are testing that and some other fixes out). However,
my understanding from Jeff is that the invoker client passes its locator to
the invoker server if it wishes to receive callbacks. The invoker
Guess Jeff beat me to it ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom
Elrod
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss remoting callbacks [was JB4DR1 Deadline
MAY 26]
Bugs item #713613, was opened at 2003-04-01 16:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713613group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mike Finn (mikefinn)
Assigned to: Scott M Stark
By definition it will have to move under java.util.concurrent in JDK 1.5
when the JSR166 is supposed to be released. There is a preliminary
javadoc for the JSR here: http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/concurrent/dist/docs/index.html
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss
DaIn-
I will checkout HEAD and test it, I have a similar configuration... If I can
get it to fail, I'll pass it on to a couple of the Java guys at Apple to see
what's up.
-Hunter
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:51:59 -0600
To:
57 matches
Mail list logo
