Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A state judge has scheduled a June 30 execution for convicted killer
Henry Lee Lucas, who once confessed to a nationwide killing spree then
recanted.
Lucas, 61, was convicted of the 1979 rape and stabbing death of an
unidentified female hitchhiker, dubbed
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A Mexican judge on Tuesday once again freed a man accused of killing
John Peter Zarate, a 40-year-old US real estate executive murdered in a
taxicab holdup.
Judge Vicente Hernandez "found no evidence" to uphold an arrest
warrant against Alfonso Gonzalez
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JUDGE JUDY FOR INDEPENDENT COUNSEL OF ZIPPERGATE !!!
Someone mistakenly leaves the cages open in the reptile
house at the Bronx Zoo and there are snakes slithering all over
the place.
Frantically, the keeper tries everything, but he cant get
Leonard Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill
Too bad the Judge can't make Paula pay all Clintons legal bills. What are
the right wing wacko gonna try next?
Len
At 04:58 PM 4/1/1998 EST, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
ROTFI bet a lot of people
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Ron
If, as the commentators say, she did make the right decision based on Arkansas
law, then why should she recuse herself? She based her decision on the evidence
so there was no bias. I bet those who didn't like the decision would not have
felt
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Len
You are priceless!!
jackief
Leonard Booth wrote:
Leonard Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I doubt I'll be the first to bring this to your attention, but the Federal
Judge was appointed by Bush.
Len
At 04:33 PM 4/1/1998 -0800, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie,
There is nothing in our tradition or Constitution that requires that we not
speak plainly. If I choose to call Al Capone a racketeer, Andrew Cunanan a
serial murderer, Clarence Thomas a perjurer, Bill Clinton an adulterer it is
idiocy to claim I am doing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge Wright
based
her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male employer
showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss it
does not
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Make sure the Judge is a former student of yours ;-).
Prior to committing acts appoint judges husband to semi-important post
;-).
Women have their faults. Men have only two.
Everything they say. Everything they do.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill
Too bad the Judge can't make Paula pay all Clintons legal bills. What are
the right wing wacko gonna try next?
Len
No but I bet the "left wing wackos" can still contribute to the Clinton
Defense Fund. Put your money where your mouth is. Ron
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well isn't that just wonderful. Let's all now expose ourselves to our
employees and ask for oral sex because it's not outrageous conduct.
Waitwe'll need to wait until we're on a business trip and have them
summoned to our hotel rooms. What? You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Viola Provenzano) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Yes, please do. It would be enlightening to know what substances
precede male hard drug use,and in what proportions, in the current
studies. Thanks.
Vi
__
You wrote:
If you like when I submit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Viola Provenzano) writes:
Hi Kathy,
Sorry I inadvertently changed the subject line.
There are exceptions to all rules, and , no, I do not think women should
receive lighter sentences for abusing or killing children than men. Each
case should be judged on its merits and the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998 16:11:54 -0800 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LOL...now I feel left out.
Bill
Bill, don't feel left out. These are mostly for get rich quick
schemes and
everyone knows you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
I thought your phrasing was impeccable, as usual, and you are 100%
correct in what you posted. :)
The more I read about that 13 year old the more bizarre that case gets.
Looks to me that not only the kid, but his father and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Terry,
As usual you are mis-stating the facts and trying to offer a flawed
argument to support YOUR bias against Clinton. Every lawyer that I've
seen quoted about this story agrees that Judge Wright followed the law in
rendering this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Jackie,
The place where I used to work had a PA system. A co-worker pulled a
prank that he thought would simply be greeted with chuckles. (This was
not on April 1, however)
He dialed the PA system and announced:
"Attention all employees.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Len,
Good point. Perhaps Bennett should put a lien on Jones' legal defense
fund before she tries to drown her sorrows in a face lift. G
I was reading an opinion this morning that this seriously undermines
Starr's efforts and that he'd be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998 06:14:48 -0800 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Make sure the Judge is a former student of yours ;-).
Prior to committing acts appoint judges husband to semi-important post
;-).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998 06:33:10 -0800 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill
Too bad the Judge can't make Paula pay all Clintons legal bills.
What are
the right wing wacko gonna try next?
Len
No
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Ron,
What's that "attributed to Mary" crap? If she doesn't have the guts to
participate in THIS group, then I don't think we need any of her pithy
comments funneled over here by anyone.
It's obvious that no one really is making an effort to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 08:22:12 -0500 moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 09:21:28 -0500 moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mac,
That says the judge had to base her decision on whatever was
presented by
Paula Jones as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 01 Apr 1998 16:59:59 -0600 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie,
You are wrong. As Justice Stevens noted in his lone dissent the
courts are
very
"Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Sue - thank you for posting this executive summary. Do you happen to
know if the full text is available online? 39 pages would be very long,
but I would like to read it anyway. Perhaps it was posted here and I
missed it. Thanks
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
She said the actions by Clinton were "boorish and offensive" but not
"outrageous." I beg to differ. If you believe an employer does precisely
what Clinton was accused of is not outrageous why not just say so, Mac.
If
"Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mac, Bill, Terry - I have been looking for the full text of the
Decision. It seems others have read it, I must have missed it. Can you
give me a pointer? I especially want to read about the tort of outrage.
I am very uncomfortable
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HI Mac,
LOL...I just downloaded my juno account and found 8 notes. 7 were from
Terry and Ron, 1 from you.
I think they are getting a bit frantic over this turn of events that
flies in the face of their opinions. The stretch is on to find some bias
"Steve Wright" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thats brilliant, in a place I used to work in I sent a lad out to town and
asked him to buy me a Look Straightlol, he phoned up and the boss answered
and all you could hear was his roaring laughter from the office :-), I got
an extra biscuit with my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Steve,
I used to work in a laboratory and we'd all send the new kid out to a
store for some fire polish so we could repair the jagged edges of broken
glass containers. Of course, there was no such thing. Fire polishing
refers to a method of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 13:25:38 -0500 moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
HI Mac,
Wow, that was sure a short decision that Terry posted. Surely Judge
Wright said more than
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie,
Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge Wright based
her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male employer
showing his manhood to a female
Angela Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
unsubscribe
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie,
If you agree that Judge Wright's decision was correctly rendered, you have
to agree with the premise. You can, of course, agree with the decision and
damn the reasoning but that is entirely different. Judge Wright's decision
has been praised rather than
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
Hi Jackie,
You are 100% correct. Even Judge Stevens in his dissenting opinion did
not offer any statements about the validity of the lie detector results.
His concern was in denying a defendant the right to present all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie,
I don't always bother acknowledging epistemological arguments about the
nature of truth when stating facts. I will admit we cannot fully know the
earth is round, that Al Capone was a racketeer and that Clarence Thomas is a
perjurer. Sometimes close is
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh Bill
I didn't think of that, silly me.
jackief
William J. Foristal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
He made it up. :)
Bill
On Wed, 01 Apr 1998 18:07:28 -0600 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeez, Bill
The article I read is starting to sound more and more like it is really on
the mark. The authors claim we are becoming mindless and simply don't give
anything thought to things before we do them.
jackief
William J. Foristal wrote:
[EMAIL
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie,
I don't always bother acknowledging epistemological arguments about the
nature of truth when stating facts.
Now this sentence is great--truth and facts in the same breath. The fact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh Terry'
The case of the college student with a tape recorder is not even parallel to
the material Judge Wright had to go by. She didn't have a tape recording, so
could only go by allegations that were not supported in the
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On June 6, 1990, identical handwritten letters were mailed in New York
City to the New York Post and the production office of the CBS news
program "60 Minutes." The letters read:
This is the Zodiac the twelve sign
will die when the belts in
41 matches
Mail list logo
