Wasnt aware the bbc did broadband. Cool.
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Naef
Sent: 09 June 2011 21:50
To: 'LEEDSLIST'
Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU: broadband provider
you are joking aren't you Steve, do you
Oi, I don't pay a penny to Rupert Murdoch - broadband, telly and phone all in
one package from Virgin. If I want to watch footie on Sky much prefer to go
down the pub!
Graham White
--- On Thu, 9/6/11, Chris Briggs c_bri...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
From: Chris Briggs c_bri...@hotmail.co.uk
Hard to disagree with Papa Smurf on this onewho watched the Alan
Sugar documentary the other week on Football finances? The players (and
silly chairmen acquiescing) are sucking the clubs dry and it is simply
not realistic and if it were any other business etc they'd be closed
down as soon as.
Whoever is paying 90 quid a month - WTF x 1000!! Jeeez man, there must be a
better deal than that somewhere!
As an employee of Vodafone I get a 50% discount, but it's €15 for ADSL (6Mbs,
and it really is 6Mbs) + telephone (which is really a mobile but with a fixed
number prefix). For normal
You all realise Murdoch doesn't own Sky don't you?
Ernot quite yet anyway ;)
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Graham White
Sent: 10 June 2011 09:01
To: Nicholas Armit; Chris Briggs
Cc: LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re:
Quick tip: Ring Sky, tell them you love the service but due to the current
climate can't afford it and will sadly have to cancel ...
Usually the results are very cost effective!!! ;-)
You all realise Murdoch doesn't own Sky don't you?
No of course not, they are totally independent of their
One other thing about Sky, you have to use the router they provide. If you
want something a little better, there's a bit of jiggery-pokery required to
get an alternative router working.
Verner
tHe LiTtLe YeLlOw DaFfOdIl @}-,-'--
--- On Fri, 10/6/11, Tim Leslie t...@3leafieldvillas.co.uk
Noone said anything about 'caving in' to anyone's demands. Say the agent was at
11k, and we're at 4k. If you can negotiate there is a deal to be done between
5-8k. Simply saying take our starting offer or fck off is a ridiculous state of
affairs. As for journeymen - both players have been with
I dont know what the current going rate is in the Championship, but I would
have thought that for a top Championship club (which we are aspiring to be
next season) £8-10k a week isn't over the odds is it?
Im not saying I agree with it, 8000 a week is an obscene sum of money, but
it doesn't sound
Exactly. It's a shite state of affairs that footballers command such cash but
that's the law of the market. If ken doesn't like it, he should go back to
running a fcking concrete business so he can pay his staff minimum wage and
expect them to be grateful.
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Jun 2011,
I ve had enough already of proprietary solutions being an apple customer at
the moment.
I try to not give my money to that asshxxx rupert M. its pretty dam hard
though. In the past I ve had
good results using smaller companies (internode in australia, xs4all in
holland), so plusnet looks like an
agree with this:
Say the agent was at 11k, and we're at 4k. If you can negotiate there is a
deal to be done between 5-8k. Simply saying take our starting offer or fck
off is a ridiculous state of affairs
In business you never tell anyone to Fxxx off. The agent was probably just
positioning
That's the club's official policy on negotiating contracts Eric. Seriously.
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Jun 2011, at 14:39, Eric B barl...@gmail.com wrote:
agree with this:
Say the agent was at 11k, and we're at 4k. If you can negotiate there is a
deal to be done between 5-8k. Simply
I have recently found a couple of nice free apps listers might be
interested in.
Minster FM app.
Listen to Minster from anywhere. It's Minster who partnered with the
Bates Broadcasting Corporation to broadcast our match commentaries last
season so this could be useful if that agreement is
well its not professional. I think we can agree on that?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.comwrote:
That's the club's official policy on negotiating contracts Eric. Seriously.
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Jun 2011, at 14:39, Eric B barl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for the record, whichever player it was was on £4000, the club offered
£7000 which is almost double the current salary and only when the agent
asked for £11000, almost treble, was he told to get stuffed.
Is anybody on the list going to double their salary this year, let alone
treble it?
I've had 60% before (60% of fck all). How many folk on the list are
professional footballers? Terry, no doubt what you and I earn is a fortune to
someone in Burkino Faso or wherever. It's all relative. If he couldn't get such
a big rise elsewhere, he wouldn't ask for it.
Sent from my iPhone
Geez, neither Kilkenny or Johnson were able to help guide us to the promised
land so I don't understand why some people are acting like we're losing Messi
because we don't want to pay the wages or fees.
I expect their replacements to be an improvement and come December or so we can
all assess
Hope you're right mate but fear you're not. You only have to read what the
chairman is saying about transfers!!
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Jun 2011, at 16:15, Mark Tuffey wiscole...@hotmail.com wrote:
Geez, neither Kilkenny or Johnson were able to help guide us to the promised
land so I
Noone said anything about 'caving in' to anyone's demands. Say the agent
was at 11k, and we're at 4k. If you can negotiate there is a deal to be
done between 5-8k. Simply saying take our starting offer or fck off is a
ridiculous state of affairs.
The player was on £4k. We offered £7k.
Apropos of nothing, of all our players who had 20 shots or more,
accuracy-wise Kilkenny was 7th and Johnson 9th out of 9. In Norwich's
team, Johnson would have come 8th out of 8.
- SI
On 10/06/2011 16:15, Mark Tuffey wrote:
Geez, neither Kilkenny or Johnson were able to help guide us to the
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Jun 2011, at 17:19, markbu...@aol.com wrote:
Noone said anything about 'caving in' to anyone's demands. Say the agent
was at 11k, and we're at 4k. If you can negotiate there is a deal to be
done between 5-8k. Simply saying take our starting offer or fck off
Of course it is negotiating.
First of all, anyone with any negotiating credentials will tell you that you
always have a walk away figure... an absolute level beyond which you will not
go. 'Negotiating' is all about getting a deal either to suit yourself
regardless of the other party
what you all seem to forget is that johnson and kilkenny will very likely
get a fat signing on fee from the clubs that sign them, something that leeds
were (quire rightly) unlikely to offer them and that means the cnuts will be
laffing all the way to the bank, although give Johnsons inability to
Of course another scenario is that one or both parties had no intention of
making a deal and priced themselves out of it.
I wouldn't put it past us to offer less than the going rate if we thought we
could do better elsewhere or if the manager just doesn't rate the player,
and I certainly wouldn't
Bannan is quality. He'll never sign for us though, he came to play and bench
warmed so that that pile of shit Livermore could start. I'm an SG fan but he
got that massively, massively wrong.
Re Kilkenny - clearly SG wanted to re-sign him, or why the offer at all? He's
let the players go he
26 matches
Mail list logo
