On 4/19/21 9:31 PM, Brian Hagen wrote:
Hello, all:
I am satisfied with the stability of the 9.1. 10.0, and 10.1 LFS
releases that I have built. Even so, I would like to take some time to
get very familiar with the bootup sequences they have. Ideally, it could
be possible to trace the
Hi Scott
On 4/9/21 12:16 PM, Scott Andrews wrote:
On 4/9/21 2:10 AM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi Scott
On 4/9/21 2:40 AM, Scott Andrews wrote:
# Function: pidofproc [-p pidfile] pathname
# The pidofproc function shall return one or more process
# identifiers for a particular daemon using
Hi Scott
On 4/9/21 2:40 AM, Scott Andrews wrote:
# Function: pidofproc [-p pidfile] pathname
# The pidofproc function shall return one or more process
# identifiers for a particular daemon using the algorithm
# given above. Only process identifiers of running
# processes should be
Hi all
It took me a while, but I now finally completed my translation of the
LFS book into Ancient Greek. It is based on LFS 10.0, and only the sysv
version is done yet, Systemd is still pending due to ancient greek only
having capital letters.
Maybe this could be mentioned on the lfs
On 3/19/21 1:14 AM, Scott Andrews wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:06:40 +0100
Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 3/18/21 6:21 PM, Scott Andrews wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:51:09 -0500
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 3/18/21 11:21 AM, Scott Andrews wrote:
I am presently looking at and working on the LFS
On 3/15/21 4:53 PM, Scott Andrews wrote:
#! /bin/sh
VERSION="$(basename ${0}) verison: 2021-03-15"
USAGE="Usage: $(basename ${0}) < option > | --status | [ service_name [ command |
--restart ] ]"
SERVICEDIR="/etc/init.d"
SERVICE=''
OPTIONS=''
if [ ${#} -eq 0 ]; then echo "${USAGE}" >&2; exit
t; and "massive cleanup to say the least".
If you want to help, that's great, but if you just want to insult other
people, then...
Bye
Tim
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Hohlstrasse 400
c/o Baubüro Insitu
8048 Zürich
st...@decentral.ch
+41 79 229 36 17
--
http://lists.l
On 3/15/21 4:53 PM, Scott Andrews wrote:
#! /bin/sh
VERSION="$(basename ${0}) verison: 2021-03-15"
USAGE="Usage: $(basename ${0}) < option > | --status | [ service_name [ command |
--restart ] ]"
SERVICEDIR="/etc/init.d"
SERVICE=''
OPTIONS=''
if [ ${#} -eq 0 ]; then echo "${USAGE}" >&2; exit
On 11/30/20 6:02 AM, Kevin Liu wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
1. compiling LFS version 10.0, chapter 5.5, glibc-2.32
2. too old : make error running ../configure, see below
checking for python3... python3
checking version of python3... 3.6.8, ok
configure: error:
*** These critical programs are
On 11/21/20 6:17 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
I recently updated my Fedora 32 installation to 33, which uses the btrfs
filesystem by default. This is a fresh installation on a new hard disk.
So far so good.
I think that LFS potentially can use this filesystem. What do y'all
think of this?
Just download and install the kernel firmware package, as described in the
book, works perfectly, and fedora does the same. I have currently about
seven different laptops working with wireless and blfs, so the problem is
not lfs, but not properly reading the book
On 9 March 2019 22:45:28
On 3/9/19 10:16 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 3/9/19 2:42 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 09/03/2019 20:55, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 3/9/19 12:30 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I was just upgrading sysvinit from 288dsf to 2.93 and then noticed
that I
could not properly reboot or even halt
Hi all
I was just upgrading sysvinit from 288dsf to 2.93 and then noticed that
I could not properly reboot or even halt the system anymore.
Does anybody know something about that? As far as I saw, the system
complained about missig /run/initctl, but maybe that's just a symptom?
I have
On 07/12/2018 07:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 06/27/2018 04:42 PM, Paul Rogers wrote:
I removed the need for using initrd, so now init=/bin/bash is working.
Time to move forward and investigate what is causing the ABRT when
starting systemd. Thanks for the pointer, it has grossed my mind before
On 03/13/2018 10:49 AM, Richard Melville wrote:
On 8 March 2018 at 17:15, Hazel Russman > wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:11:23 -0600
Bruce Dubbs >
wrote:
> >Ken
Hi René
On 02/14/2018 02:28 PM, René Nyffenegger wrote:
Please do not top post. According to what you say, there should be no
need to
add libc_cv_ctors_header=yes. Looking at my logs, I have, during the
configure
stage:
--
checking whether to use .ctors/.dtors header and
On 02/12/2018 08:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that during LFS build, some programs will not work after
they are installed, because their libraries are in /tools/lib and
/tools/lib is not in the search path of the dynamic linker.
An example is e2fsprogs
On 02/12/2018 07:31 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 12/02/2018 18:54, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 11/02/2018 23:01, Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 02/11/2018 10:37 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Tim Tassonis wrote:
I have found a workaround for my problem:
If I replace
mount -vt devpts devpts $LFS/dev/pts
Hi all
I noticed that during LFS build, some programs will not work after they
are installed, because their libraries are in /tools/lib and /tools/lib
is not in the search path of the dynamic linker.
An example is e2fsprogs, ldd on /bin/chattr results in:
linux-vdso.so.1
On 02/11/2018 10:07 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 02/11/2018 09:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I currently building LFS (svn) and seem to get a problem doing su in
the chroot environment. I am past shadow now and have set-up a user
to work with. The user however
Hi all
I currently building LFS (svn) and seem to get a problem doing su in the
chroot environment. I am past shadow now and have set-up a user to work
with. The user however should be able to su to root. I have done the
same on lfs 7.9 and lfs 8.0 without problems.
I think, I follow the
On 02/03/2018 10:58 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 09:26:31PM +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I'm finally starting with a complete new rebuild of LFS/BLFS based on 8.1.
As gcc 7.3 just was released and is needed for spectre v2 mitigation, I
wondered if it makes sense to use
On 01/31/2018 10:43 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
If anybody wants to add full retpoline mitigation (against Spectre
v2) to an older system, the following works on x86_64 (I no longer
have i686 systems to test on).
I have tested this on my oldest available system (LFS-7.6, using
gcc-4.9.1 and which
On February 1, 2018 22:27:15 Frans de Boer wrote:
LS,
I just had to downgrade my email security in order to be able to send
messages to the list. Just because the email server used for the list
does not support TLS. It's 2018, and no TLS support?
Maybe you should get
On July 6, 2017 7:56:02 PM Andrew Dance wrote:
Hi all!
I've been tinkering with LFS on my Macbook Pro Retina and have managed to
get it booted up. However, I'm having trouble getting my wifi card to work.
It's a Broadcom bcm4360. There are 2 flavors, evidently.
On April 21, 2017 12:25:38 Stephen Berman <stephen.ber...@gmx.net> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:26:15 -0600 Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
On 03/11/2017 10:41 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 11/03/2017 22:11, Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 03/11/2017 09:17 PM, Pie
On 04/06/2017 05:48 PM, Edgar Alwers wrote:
Am 05.04.2017 um 17:41 schrieb Marco Borrini:
With latest bc, kernel compilation seems to hang
Could you please explain what "bc" is ?
Go read for yourself:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/bc.html
Thanks, Edgar
--
Hi all
I just successfully finished my lfs 8.0 build and would first like to
thank everybody involved for all their work towards lfs.
When backporting a few packages to an older system that contains lots of
blfs stuff, I came across some instances where an lfs package links
against a blfs
Hi again
On my full lfs 8.0 rebuild, I have built shadow 4.4 as specified on the
lfs page, however I did it the "blfs way" of first installing pam.
When building shadow, I got the following error:
su.c:376:3: error: too few arguments to function 'snprintf'
snprintf (kill_msg, _("
On 03/24/2017 09:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the
situation
that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but is compiled
before it.
Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils
Hi all
I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the
situation that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but is
compiled before it.
Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This would
allow me to get the same results later if I recompile
On 03/11/2017 10:41 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 11/03/2017 22:11, Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 03/11/2017 09:17 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 11/03/2017 21:11, Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 03/11/2017 09:00 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I tried to upgrade my lfs machine to kbd 2.0.4 and after
On 03/11/2017 09:17 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 11/03/2017 21:11, Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 03/11/2017 09:00 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I tried to upgrade my lfs machine to kbd 2.0.4 and after a reboot init
reported a failure (rc = 1) and needed a return press to continue.
Unfortunately
Hi all
I tried to upgrade my lfs machine to kbd 2.0.4 and after a reboot init
reported a failure (rc = 1) and needed a return press to continue.
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find the reason for this. I use
the exact console bootscript from LFS-Bootscripts (20150222) and after a
ot top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pos
asked
exactly the same question a while ago, and got plenty of answers to it.
It's really one of the lowest form of asshole-ism to abuse the
helpfulness of other people in order to get some amusement.
Please fuck off.
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Dennlerstasse 36
8047 Zürich
st
bc-2.24
Zlib-1.2.8
File-5.28
Binutils-2.27
GMP-6.1.1
MPFR-3.1.4
MPC-1.0.3
with the gentoo compiler and not the one that you built yourself.
Chris
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Dennlerstasse 36
8047 Zürich
st...@decentral.ch
+41 79 229 36 17
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.
?
Thank you all for the help--and the patience.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Dennlerstasse 36
8047 Zürich
st...@decentral.ch
+41 79 229 36 17
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/fa
running on the same metal, and I
just copied over the 4.2 configuration and did
"make oldconfig"
to build 4.7.2.
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Dennlerstasse 36
8047 Zürich
st...@decentral.ch
+41 79 229 36 17
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-sup
On 09/14/2016 06:06 AM, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Rob > wrote:
Building LFS-7.10-Systemd
I installed linux-pam, reinstalled shadow, reinstalled systemd.
However, I must have missed a step
On 09/04/2016 10:12 AM, Rob wrote:
Thanos Baloukas wrote:
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2016-September/050333.html
In that thread, you linked to a script collection, on github. The instructions
in there did not work (not surprising), and asking
On 08/17/16 17:35, Albert Pinto Gil wrote:
Hi, I'm having some problems with the installation of psmisc package (in
chapter 6.26). I have followed every single instruction in the book
carefully and when I try to prepare the package for its compilation it says:
checking whether ln -s works...
On 06/09/16 20:13, thorsten wrote:
Thanks for the info. I was hoping for something that you could install
system-wide, being activated upon the user's locale setting, but mozilla
seems to go another way here.
Cheers
Tim
Hi Tim,
I do not know if this is what you are searching for, but I do
as I know, this also works for multiple locales in parallel, however I
did not try it.
Looks exactly what I was looking for. Sadly there is no tag (yet) for
FIREFOX_46_0_RELEASE, which is what I'm using.
Kind regards
Tim
regards
thorsten
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Dennle
On May 26, 2016 22:48:06 Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:03:44PM +0200, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I just wanted to ask if anybody has already compiled firefox with support
for some other language? The blfs firefox page seems to mention this
Hi all
I just wanted to ask if anybody has already compiled firefox with
support for some other language? The blfs firefox page seems to mention
this (which is totally ok, of course).
Cheers
Tim
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On 03/17/16 13:50, "René Nidegger" wrote:
I am trying to execute the steps outlined in
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/kernfs.html
I am logged in as lfs.
The commands
mknod -m 600 $LFS/dev/console c 5 1
mknod -m 666 $LFS/dev/null c 1 3
print "Operation not
On 02/22/16 22:05, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:55:42PM +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
Due to CVE-2015-7547, I have upgraded glibc to a patched version on three
systems now and after the upgrade the reboot hung on two of them. After a
power cycle, they both came up nicely
Hi all
Due to CVE-2015-7547, I have upgraded glibc to a patched version on
three systems now and after the upgrade the reboot hung on two of them.
After a power cycle, they both came up nicely again.
On the third, I reloaded init by calling
init u
before the reboot and the reboot went
- IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Dennlerstasse 36
8047 Zürich
st...@decentral.ch
+41 79 229 36 17
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up
On 10/25/15 20:00, James E. Lang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Tassonis <st...@decentral.ch <mailto:st...@decentral.ch>>
To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
<mailto:lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org>
Sent: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 11:51
Subject: Re: [lfs-s
On 25.08.2015 11:07, Simon Kitching wrote:
On 08/25/2015 10:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 15:29 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If distros like RedHat were really looking for consistency, they
would use /bin, /lib, and /sbin, and remove them from /usr. What
they really are doing
Hi all
I've successully build an 64-bit lfs/blfs system that also runs very
nicely and leaves next to nothing desired.
Sadly, I'm getting to the point of having to use some binary-only stuff
like skype and printer drivers that only exist in 32-bit variants,
forcing me to have some sort of
On 24.08.2015 18:12, Chris Staub wrote:
On 08/24/2015 08:27 AM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I've successully build an 64-bit lfs/blfs system that also runs very
nicely and leaves next to nothing desired.
Sadly, I'm getting to the point of having to use some binary-only stuff
like skype
On 24.08.2015 19:01, Chris Staub wrote:
On 08/24/2015 12:48 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 24.08.2015 18:12, Chris Staub wrote:
On 08/24/2015 08:27 AM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I've successully build an 64-bit lfs/blfs system that also runs very
nicely and leaves next to nothing desired.
Sadly
On March 12, 2015 11:18:53 PM Ekotek Office off...@ekotek.rs wrote:
Heya,
the URL http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/ is still pointing to
7.6. Is this intentionally or by error?
You might want to refresh your browser cache, it's definitely pointing to
7.7...
Cheers
Tim
IP's on one interface.
On 02/07/15 04:13, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I would like to create an alias interface in the form of eth0:0 to set
a a second ip address on the interface. I tried the (obvious):
cat /etc/sysconfig/ifconfig.eth0:0 EOF
ONBOOT=yes
IFACE=eth0:0
SERVICE=ipv4-static
IP
a hacker already
has root.
Not at all. The fact remains, whatever is in the SERVICE variable will
be executed with root priveleges by init, however it got that way,
whatever damage it may wreak, and it's not necessary.
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Dennlerstasse 36
8047 Zürich
Hi all
I'm now just building my second LFS 7.6 system where I decided to
integrate PAM into the build, to not having to install shadow and libcap
twice in order for PAM to work.
My order, diverting from the book, was:
- ncurses (same)
- attr (same)
- acl (same)
- pam (new)
- sed (new)
- libcap
undermines.
With many thanks to _all_ developers,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers edgaralw...@gmx.de
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Dennlerstasse 36
8047 Zürich
st...@decentral.ch
+41 79 229 36 17
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo
On 10/07/2014 09:23 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 19:56 +0200, Tim Tassonis wrote:
My question for future installation is:
Are there known problems if I integrate pam already in the initial lfs
install, not then having to reinstall shadow and libcap. I would then
change
- 6.23. Linux-PAM-1.1.8
- 6.24. Libcap-2.24 (with instructions from blfs)
- 6.25. Sed-4.2.2
- 6.26. Shadow-4.2.1 (with instructions from blfs)
...
Is this supported as well?
Kind regards
Tim
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Dennlerstasse 36
8047 Zürich
st...@decentral.ch
+41 79 229 36 17
62 matches
Mail list logo