changing fingering position

This code write some fingering on "b" pitch. \version "2.19.82" {b4\finger\markup {2 \circle 3 2} \prall} .. and here it is the result: [image: image.png] This is ok except the fact that the elements 2 (3) 2 are written not enough close each other. How can I make them more close like in the

Re: frescobaldi print music

Thank you Ben and Michael. Good to know! g. On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 21:03, Michael Rivers wrote: > I have always had formatting problems printing from Frescobaldi too. The > built-in PDF printer in Windows 10 works just fine for me. > > > > -- > Sent from:

frescobaldi print music

To avoid having one or two staves on last page, I use often page-count. Unfortunately this often cuts the bottom of the page (the tagline or some notes). Today I tried to understand better the problem, checking the printable area of the printer, playing with annotate-spacing, margin etc,. And I

Re: fingering position

Thank you David and Noeck, your solutions work. I will also check the documentation about staff-padding and avoid-slur as soon as the lilypond site will work again. Thanks, g. On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 00:22, Noeck wrote: > Dear Gianmaria, > > here are two more options: > > > \fixed c' { >

fingering position

This code \version "2.19.82" \fixed c' { a8\3( b d'-5 c'\4 b a) r4} generate this [image: image.png] I don't like having some fingering above the slur (3) and some below it (5 & 4). How can I change this? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing

Re: add a ticktock measure to the beginning of a score

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 12:03, David Kastrup wrote: > Gianmaria Lari writes: > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 10:47, David Kastrup wrote: > > > >> Gianmaria Lari writes: > >> > >> > For this I thought to write a substitution function etc.

Re: add a ticktock measure to the beginning of a score

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 10:47, David Kastrup wrote: > Gianmaria Lari writes: > > > For this I thought to write a substitution function etc. Something like > > this (it doesn't compile): > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > myScore = > > #(define-vo

add a ticktock measure to the beginning of a score

Few days ago I asked how to get the number of beats and the duration of each beat of a measure. The reason was that I wanted to try to write some facilities to add a ticktock measure at the beginning of a score: My idea was to transform a score like this \version "2.19.81" music = {\time 3/4 a

Re: scheme variable name in lilypond

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 23:37, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2018-06-25 23:31 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari : > > Is there any way to refer a scheme variable containing numbers in the > name, > > in lilypond? > > > > For example, if I write: > > > > #(define d

scheme variable name in lilypond

Is there any way to refer a scheme variable containing numbers in the name, in lilypond? For example, if I write: #(define duration32 (ly:make-duration (ly:intlog2 32))) duration32 is a valid scheme variable name. But this is not a valid lilypond variable name. Is there any way to access it

Re: variable of type finger

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 22:44, David Kastrup wrote: > Gianmaria Lari writes: > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 15:49, David Kastrup wrote: > > > >> Gianmaria Lari writes: > >> > >> > This code define a variable containing a duration and the use it:

Re: variable of type finger

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 15:49, David Kastrup wrote: > Gianmaria Lari writes: > > > This code define a variable containing a duration and the use it: > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > #(define myDuration (ly:make-duration 4 0)) > > { a\myDuration} > &

variable of type finger

This code define a variable containing a duration and the use it: \version "2.19.81" #(define myDuration (ly:make-duration 4 0)) { a\myDuration} I can do something similar wit fingering: \version "2.19.81" myFinger = \finger "3" { a\myFinger} How can I rewrite the previous myFinger =

scheme function returning #beats and beat duration

Is there any scheme function returning the number of beats and the duration of each beat of the mesure where the function is invoked? For instance, I would like this code.. \version "2.19.81" { \time 3/4 \writeBeats \writeBeatDuration a4 b a %just some music \time 4/4 \writeBeats

Re: avoid orphan

; {a b c' d'} > > > HTH > Jan-Peter > > Am 20.06.2018 um 10:15 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > > I have a code similar to this > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > \markup "Etude" > > {a b c'

avoid orphan

I have a code similar to this \version "2.19.81" \markup "Etude" {a b c' d'} \markup "Etude" {a b c' d'} [.] Is there any way to keep the markup and score together? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: omit fingering

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 at 19:01, David Kastrup wrote: > Gianmaria Lari writes: > > > On the accordion scores to indicate that the button to press is on the > > counter bass we put a small dash under the finger number. This is how > David > > Kastrup suggest me to do it

omit fingering

On the accordion scores to indicate that the button to press is on the counter bass we put a small dash under the finger number. This is how David Kastrup suggest me to do it: \version "2.19.81" {a_\markup \underline \finger 3} This is perfect. But, is there any way to make it removed when I

Re: output some string

On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 at 21:49, Thomas Morley wrote: > > > 2018-06-16 16:56 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari : > >> >> >> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 22:47, Thomas Morley >> wrote: >> >>> 2018-06-15 20:11 GMT+02:00 Aaron Hill : >>> > On 2018-06-15

Re: output some string

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 22:47, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2018-06-15 20:11 GMT+02:00 Aaron Hill : > > On 2018-06-15 09:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > >> > >> I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using > >> frescobaldi and I need some help for

Re: output some string

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 19:33, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 15.06.2018 18:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using > > frescobaldi and I need some help for the output. > > The following code > > > > \vers

Re: output some string

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 20:12, Aaron Hill wrote: > On 2018-06-15 09:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using > > frescobaldi and I need some help for the output. > > The following code > > > > \versi

output some string

I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using frescobaldi and I need some help for the output. The following code \version "2.19.81" #(define (f w) w) $(f "Hello") generates a pdf file containing "Hello". If my function f is called passing something that is not a string

Re: Numbers as easy note heads with RhythmicStaff

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 15:00, Aaron Hill wrote: > On 2018-06-15 05:27, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > \version "2.19.81" > > #(define Ez_numbers_engraver > >(make-engraver > > (acknowledgers > > ((note-head-interface engraver grob source-engrave

Numbers as easy note heads with RhythmicStaff

This code \version "2.19.81" \new RhythmicStaff { \easyHeadsOn a4 b8 a } generate this score: [image: image.png] That's great. Now instead of the note name, I would like to write the numbers representing the scale-degree inside the note head. So I tried adding to the previous code the

Re: changing file name of midi output

On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 at 16:29, Karlin High wrote: > On 6/13/2018 9:03 AM, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > > > Is there any way to change the numeration like this: > > > > document-01.mid > > document-02.mid > > document-03.mid > > I asked The Goo

changing file name of midi output

If I compile the following code in Frescobaldi \version "2.19.81" \score { {a b } \midi{}} \score { {a b } \midi{}} \score { {a b } \midi{}} lilypond generates the following midi files: document.mid document-1.mid document-2.mid Is there any way to change the numeration like this:

Re: check undefined variable scheme

Thank you David, Urs and Andrew for the code, the link to the documentation and the study suggestion! On Thu, 24 May 2018 at 11:00, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Gianmaria, > > The others have beat me to it, but I just wanted to say you should read up > on closures in

check undefined variable scheme

The following function increase a counter by 1 and return it as string #(define count 0) #(define (nextcount) (begin (set! count (+ 1 count)) (number->string count) ) ) Is my code ok, or I should write it in a different way? Is

Re: split { {a b} {c' d'} {e' f'} } in multiple expression

On 16 May 2018 at 09:04, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 16 May 2018 at 02:23, Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Gianmaria, >> >> From your posts I suspect you may find a use for Abjad. Have you

Re: split { {a b} {c' d'} {e' f'} } in multiple expression

On 16 May 2018 at 02:23, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Gianmaria, > > From your posts I suspect you may find a use for Abjad. Have you looked > into it? > > Just a suggestion. > > Andrew > > Ciao Andrew, your suggestion is welcome! I had a look to Abjad when I discovered

split { {a b} {c' d'} {e' f'} } in multiple expression

I have a musical expression made of several musical expression like the following: { {a b} {c' d'} {e' f'} } I would like to loop on it and generate a different score with each sub-expression. Something like this: { foreach x in X \myScore \x } How can I do it? Thank you. P.S. The

Re: concatenating notes with a music expression

On 15 May 2018 at 15:45, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 15 May 2018 at 12:10, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > >> Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> writes: > &

Re: concatenating notes with a music expression

On 15 May 2018 at 12:10, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> writes: > > > Am 15.05.2018 um 10:27 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > >> Thank you Gilles I have yet a problem, how can engrave the foo > >> generated list i

Re: concatenating notes with a music expression

On 15 May 2018 at 11:40, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: > > Thank you Gilles I have yet a problem, how can engrave the foo > generated list in a score? > > Thank you Lukas & Malte. I tried your solutions and they works! Thanks!!! ___

Re: concatenating notes with a music expression

On 15 May 2018 at 00:40, Gilles Thibault wrote: > Le 2018-05-12 00:16, Sirius Barras a écrit : > >> I have a sequence of notes and a music expression. >> How could be done a function concatenating each element of the sequence >> with the music expression? >> >> For instance, if

Re: simple scheme function #{ $note #}

On 11 May 2018 at 17:58, Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> wrote: > On 2018-05-11 08:46, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> writes: >> >> On 2018-05-11 06:53, Gianmaria Lari wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry

simple scheme function #{ $note #}

Sorry to bother with a simple question. Why this does not work? \version "2.19.81" pit = #(define-music-function (p) (ly:pitch?) #{ $p #} ) { \pit c' } Changing the body to #{ $p $p #} or #{ $pit 4 #} or #{ $p a' #} it works g.

Re: variable and tie

On 9 May 2018 at 10:45, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > >> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gma

Re: variable and tie

On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I would like to tie the last note contained in a variable like this > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > var = {a b a} > > {\

Apply legato to music

This code generate a midi file where the first and last measure are played "legato" because of the slur. \version "2.19.81" \include "articulate.ly" music = { b( b b b) | d' d' d' d' | c'( c' c' c') } \score { \articulate \music \midi{} } Now I would like to rewrite the previous code

Re: fingering notation alternative

On 7 May 2018 at 23:59, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-05-07 23:35 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>: > > > > > I tried to write alternative fingering putting fingering numbers on a > > column. This is what I did:

Re: fingering notation alternative

On 5 May 2018 at 22:37, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5 May 2018 at 17:18, Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: >> >>> This is more a notation question t

Re: fingering notation alternative

On 5 May 2018 at 17:18, Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> wrote: > > > Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > >> This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. >> >> Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can

fingering notation alternative

This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be played for example with 2 or 3? I normally write \finger "2(3)" or \finger "2/3" but I'm not sure this is correct. Thank you, g.

alternative and slur

Have a look to this code and the resulting engraving: \version "2.19.81" { \repeat volta 2 {a( a a a} \alternative { {b1)} {c'1}} } Is there any way to indicate that the second alternative should be slurred like the first one - "a( a a a c1)" ? Maybe an half slur? It's just a curiosity.

Re: slur and percent

On 3 May 2018 at 01:27, Aaron Hill wrote: > Is there any way to write this >>> >>> \version "2.19.81" >>> {a( b c' a a b c' a)} >>> >>> with a repeat percent? Something similar to this: >>> >>> \version "2.19.81" >>> {\repeat percent 2 {a( b c' a} ) } >>> >>> Thank you,

fingering and addfingering

I have short music exercises (for accordion) that I would like to engrave with alternate fingering like in the following example: \version "2.19.81" \fixed c' {c-2 d-3 e-2 f-3 g-2 a-3 b-4 c'-5} \fixed c' {c-1 d-2 e-3 f-4 g-2 a-3 b-4 c'-5} \fixed c' {c-1 d-2 e-3 f-4 g-2 a\3 b-4 c'\5} and this is

Re: slur and percent

On 2 May 2018 at 08:19, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any way to write this > > \version "2.19.81" > {a( b c' a a b c' a)} > > > with a repeat percent? Something similar to this: > > \version "2.19.81" > {\repeat

Re: Shortcut for Frescobaldi

On 2 May 2018 at 16:31, Tim Slattery wrote: > I installed Frescobaldi on my new Win10 PC. Everything's good, except > that the installation process didn't create a shortcut on the desktop. > I tried to look at the properties of the entry in the Start menu, but > apparently

Re: slur and percent

On 2 May 2018 at 14:50, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: > On 02.05.2018 08:19, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > >> Is there any way to write this >> >> \version "2.19.81" >> {a( b c' a a b c' a)} >> >> >> with a repeat

Re: tenuto fingering: 3t, 2t, 4t, etc.

On 2 May 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 2 May 2018 at 08:56, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> > >> Something like this? > >> > >> \versi

Re: tenuto fingering: 3t, 2t, 4t, etc.

On 2 May 2018 at 08:56, David Kastrup wrote: > Federico Bruni writes: > > > Hi all > > > > How can I create custom fingerings which are made of a number and a > > letter? > > I want to display 3t, 2t, etc. > > > > I found this snippet in the LSR: > >

slur and percent

Is there any way to write this \version "2.19.81" {a( b c' a a b c' a)} with a repeat percent? Something similar to this: \version "2.19.81" {\repeat percent 2 {a( b c' a} ) } Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: spacer rest *

On 1 May 2018 at 09:39, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > --- Exceptions --- > > Making "s8 8 8" acting differently than "c8 8 8" introduce an > > exception. > > No

Re: spacer rest *

On 1 May 2018 at 05:32, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 01 May 2018 at 00:15:24 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote: > > David Wright writes: > > > > > AFAICT the important exception that was introduced with naked > > > durations was that c 4 notates a

Re: spacer rest *

On 1 May 2018 at 00:09, David Wright <da...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri 27 Apr 2018 at 22:56:31 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > On 27 April 2018 at 15:44, David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> > wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > Well, I do

Re: spacer rest *

On 27 April 2018 at 15:45, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: > On 27.04.2018 10:53, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > >> To fix it I found two different ways. >> First one: >> >> \version "2.19.81" >> \score { >>

Re: spacer rest *

On 27 April 2018 at 15:44, David Wright wrote: > [...] > Well, I don't know how the decision was arrived at, but my own view is > that it's the correct one. The duration-only notation is aimed at > people writing rhythms, and they write them for instruments that play >

Re: frescobaldi clipboard file name

On 24 April 2018 at 16:30, David Wright <da...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue 24 Apr 2018 at 08:53:01 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > On 23 April 2018 at 15:48, David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> > wrote: > > > > > On Mon 23 Apr 2018 at

Re: spacer rest *

On 27 April 2018 at 14:58, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> writes: > > > On Fri 27 Apr 2018 at 13:49:24 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote: > >> On 27 April 2018 at 11:56, Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.co

Re: spacer rest *

On 27 April 2018 at 11:56, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Gianmaria, > > The shorthand of using a duration number only applies to notes, not rests. > > As per the NR: > > Isolated durations – durations without a pitch – that occur within a music > sequence will take their

Re: spacer rest *

On 25 April 2018 at 10:09, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't understand the difference between s8 8 8 and s8*3. > > For example have a look to the following code that engrave two scores: > > \version "2.19.81" > rh = \fixed c'

Re: Off topic - SITT 20 Studies in Double Stops

On 24 April 2018 at 21:13, Trevor Bača <trevorb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 2:06 AM, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> My question is off topic. I hope it will not be a problem. >> >> The following is one exc

Re: spacer rest *

hich some of us still might remember from > their childhood. Every block has a single slot to attach stuff to. > > s8 8 8 are 3 distinct cubes of edge length 1. > s8*3 is a single block measuring 1x1x3. > > Cheers, Robert > > > On 25 Apr 2018, at 10:09, Gianmaria Lari &l

spacer rest *

I don't understand the difference between s8 8 8 and s8*3. For example have a look to the following code that engrave two scores: \version "2.19.81" rh = \fixed c'{g8 8 8 8} dyn = { s8 \> 8 8 8 \!} { << \rh \new Dynamics \dyn >> } dyn = { s8 \> 8*3 \!} { << \rh \new Dynamics \dyn >> } These

Off topic - SITT 20 Studies in Double Stops

My question is off topic. I hope it will not be a problem. The following is one excerpt from the Sitt book, 20 studies in Double Stops. Why in the first three measures the G, D and A are written as g4~4~4~4 d 4~4~4~4 a4~4~4~4 instead of g1 d1 a1? Any idea? Ciao, g.

Re: frescobaldi clipboard file name

On 23 April 2018 at 15:48, David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon 23 Apr 2018 at 09:43:01 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > The following frescobaldi snippet call the "more.com" program with the > > parameter "\\readme" > >

frescobaldi clipboard file name

The following frescobaldi snippet call the "more.com" program with the parameter "\\readme" -*- python; from subprocess import call call(["more.com", "\\readme"]) This other one-line snippet pastes, in the frescobaldi editor window at the cursor position, the lilypond file name (including

Re: frescobaldi destination temp folder

On 22 April 2018 at 04:55, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Kieran, > > Using F 3.0.0, if you don't save the file a temp filename is generated. > The output goes to a file in /tmp (Linux) which is a randomly generated > name different each time. So how are you even looking at

Re: frescobaldi destination temp folder

On 22 April 2018 at 00:48, Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> wrote: > > > Am 21.04.2018 um 14:54 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > > > > On 21 April 2018 at 09:44, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 21 April 2018 at 08:39, Urs Liska <li

Re: frescobaldi destination temp folder

On 21 April 2018 at 09:44, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 April 2018 at 08:39, Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 20.04.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: >> >> When I want to try a lilypond snippet us

Re: frescobaldi destination temp folder

On 21 April 2018 at 08:39, Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> wrote: > > > Am 20.04.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > > When I want to try a lilypond snippet using Frescobaldi, I normally create > a new file and I compile it without save it explicitly. Fresc

frescobaldi destination temp folder

When I want to try a lilypond snippet using Frescobaldi, I normally create a new file and I compile it without save it explicitly. Frescobaldi saves it for me in a temporary folder (in my Frescobaldi settings I have "Save the document if possibile" checked). For example if I do it now, in the

Re: using \pushToTag and \removeWithTag consecutively

On 14 April 2018 at 15:46, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I found a not nice solution but something that work: > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > var = {a \tag #'herea {} \tag #'he

Re: using \pushToTag and \removeWithTag consecutively

On 14 April 2018 at 15:34, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 14 April 2018 at 15:15, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > I don't understand the behaviour

Re: using \pushToTag and \removeWithTag consecutively

On 14 April 2018 at 15:15, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I don't understand the behaviour of this code: > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > var = {a \tag #'here {b} a} > > {\var

Re: note duration without note name

On 13 April 2018 at 09:47, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 13 April 2018 at 09:15, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > >> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:

using \pushToTag and \removeWithTag consecutively

I don't understand the behaviour of this code: \version "2.19.81" var = {a \tag #'here {b} a} {\var} %Result: a b a {\removeWithTag #'here \var} %Result: a a {\pushToTag #'here b! \removeWithTag #'here \var} %Result: a a ; Expected: a b! a The result is: a b a - ok! a a - ok! a a - not ok;

Re: \pushToTag and \appendToTag help

On 13 April 2018 at 11:48, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 13 April 2018 at 10:00, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > >> How about pointing out what you find hard to understand in

Re: generate a warning/error if tag is not specified

[ Is there any way to make lilypond complaint with a compilation error/warning in case I don't specify a \keepWithTag or \removeWithTag?] On 13 April 2018 at 15:17, Knute Snortum wrote: > One way would be to use bar line checks (|) and \barNumberCheck: > > %%% Start >

Re: \pushToTag and \appendToTag help

On 13 April 2018 at 10:00, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 13 April 2018 at 09:17, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > >> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: &g

Re: \pushToTag and \appendToTag help

On 13 April 2018 at 09:17, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I didn't understand what I can do and how to use the \pushToTag and > > \appendToTag. > > > > Do you have a very simple example? >

Re: note duration without note name

On 13 April 2018 at 09:15, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I would expect the two scores generated by the following code were the > > same. > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > {a8

Re: variable and tie

Oh! I will wait for it :) Thank you David! On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I would like to tie the last note contained in a variable like this > > > > \version &

generate a warning/error if tag is not specified

Suppose that I define a variable so that according to a tag I can generate a a a or a b a Is there any way to make lilypond complaint with a compilation error/warning in case I don't specify a \keepWithTag or \removeWithTag? For example: \version "2.19.81" var = { a \tag#'vera a

\pushToTag and \appendToTag help

I didn't understand what I can do and how to use the \pushToTag and \appendToTag. Do you have a very simple example? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

note duration without note name

I would expect the two scores generated by the following code were the same. \version "2.19.81" {a8 8} {a 8} Why lilypond treats them differently? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

variable and tie

I would like to tie the last note contained in a variable like this \version "2.19.81" var = {a b a} {\var ~ a} but this generates an error. This is just a simple example, the reason why I would like to do this is because the variable in the real piece is used many times without the tie except

Re: tag and default

On 12 April 2018 at 14:16, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 12 April 2018 at 11:42, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> > >> What are you trying to do? Basically you are asking

Re: tag and default

On 12 April 2018 at 11:42, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > This code ... > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > var = { > > \tag #'mya {a} > > \tag #'myb {b} > &g

tag and default

This code ... \version "2.19.81" var = { \tag #'mya {a} \tag #'myb {b} } { \keepWithTag #'mya \var } { \keepWithTag #'myb \var } { \var} creates three scores: 1) a 2) b 3) a b In the third case, where no \keepWithTag is specified, lilypond returns all elements (a and b). Is there any way

Re: Using articulate.ly without modifying the visual output

On 4 April 2018 at 13:50, David Kastrup wrote: > Paolo Prete writes: > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to produce from the same .ly file, a .midi file with the > > articulate.ly script and a .pdf WITHOUT the articulate.ly script. > > > > How can I do that?

frescobaldi png output

Hello, Using lilypond-book-preamble.ly like in the following example \include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly" \version "2.19.81" { c' d' a2 } I have been to make Frescobaldi output a score that just fit the size of what is written (and not an entire a4 paper). I know Frescobaldi has a nice

Re: c#(+6 2)

On 14 March 2018 at 10:13, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 12 March 2018 at 10:06, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 12 March 2

Re: c#(+6 2)

On 12 March 2018 at 10:06, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 12 March 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On 11 March 2018 at 10:58, David K

Re: c#(+6 2)

On 12 March 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 11 March 2018 at 10:58, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > >> Then Scheme expressions written using # in the middle of mu

Re: c#(+6 2)

On 11 March 2018 at 10:58, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Just to understand how does it work the relation between scheme and > > lilypond. Why this does not work? > > > > \version "2

c#(+6 2)

Just to understand how does it work the relation between scheme and lilypond. Why this does not work? \version "2.19.81" { c#(+6 2) } I would expect this compile to \version "2.19.81" { c8 } Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: scheme modalTranspose

On 10 March 2018 at 02:59, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Gianamari, > > Add a numerical parameter. > > > \version "2.19.81" > multiModal = #(define-music-function (scale patternMelodic num) > (ly:music? ly:music? number?) >#{ >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >