Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its fifth year! - - Now includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the
Add this line to the end.
insmod_opt=-f
BTW, in modules.conf must be line
alias eth0 qeth
Then, let's go to your chandev.
_I_ think must be
noauto
qeth0,0x0700,0x0701,0x0702,0,0
add_parms,0x10,0x0700,0x0702,portname:LNXDQ
Yes, also the same :)
After that, provide log.
ps: did you do
I run Linux on an iMac as well. My research pointed me to using
YellowDog Linux rather than SuSE. Once you read the install instructions
and do the pre-install planning, it works pretty well (including KDE,
GNOME, music etc.) although I strongly suggest that if you're running OS
9 or OS X that you
We currently have WAS 1.2 and 3.5 in production on OS/390 and are in
progress of installing WAS 4 on the system programmer test LPAR. WAS 4
alternate configuration is the same as 3.5, which is to say a relatively
modest footprint but no J2EE. Full-blown WAS 4 J2EE environment seems like
it's
Does anyone know a link to get
zebra for Linux S390 as a rpm Package.
Didn't find it at www.zebra.org or
Redhat's rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/rawhide/1.0/s390/RedHat/RPMS ?
Also not at rpmseek.com
--
Harald Seifert
Informatik-Systemprogrammierung
HUK Coburg
Bahnhofsplatz
96444 Coburg
Phone
In my honest opinion, you should start with WAS 5. Skip 4 ESPECIALLY if you
are going to deploy it on OS/390 or Z/OS. WAS 4 on os/390 was/is a huge
pain in the ass compared to distributed. WAS 5 will not be.
|-+
| | Steven A. Adams|
|
What is the best way to change the machine name and IP address of linux
system? I built a replacement for 'rockhopper' which is currently called
'nokomis' . I know that the httpd server got customized tor the 'nokomis'
name and IP address. Fairly trivial to change. What I'm mostly concerned
with
I had been using this mirror for downloading RPM's that I felt were needed:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/os/s390/RedHat/RPMS/
However, they apparently do not allow anonymous logins anymore. It has been a while
since I needed any RPM's. But, I used to be able to check the
Ken,
That's not a mirror site, that's Red Hat's primary FTP server. More than
likely the number of anonymous connections was maxed out when you tried to
connect. Go to http://www.redhat.com/download/mirror.html and you'll find a
list of mirror sites. Be aware that for S/390, all the links are
Perhaps, but at that point you've got a working network connection, and it's
a pretty simple matter to do what has to be done. Fooling around with
initrd files, etc., is a lot more tedious.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Rob van der Heij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Since yesterday the error has been:
421 There are too many connected users, please try later.
This is for updates.redhat.com and ftp.redhat.com.
I think IE just lets you know anonymous login failed, not why.
Perhaps they reduced the number of allowed connected users? Every so
often I can still
Once again, Thanks Mark.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/06/03 10:01AM
Ken,
That's not a mirror site, that's Red Hat's primary FTP server. More than
likely the number of anonymous connections was maxed out when you tried to
connect. Go to http://www.redhat.com/download/mirror.html and you'll find a
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:54:21AM -0500, Alan Altmark wrote:
If you don't want to share an OSA, don't. Then you are free to be primary
router on it an all of these problems go away.
Very true. If only we could convince everyone to dedicate an OSA to
their Linux/390 implementation.
On Thursday, 03/06/2003 at 12:02 EST, Adam Thornton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very true. If only we could convince everyone to dedicate an OSA to
their Linux/390 implementation.
I have been convincing customers. You can, too.
1. There needs to be more than one path out of the box (high
Hi Ken,
Anonymous logins do work, but ftp.redhat.com is the main site and almost
always near the user connection limit ... :(
Brock
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 09:44, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
I had been using this mirror for downloading RPM's that I felt were needed:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:02:42PM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
Also, I don't think I ever described the hypothetical person as my
special friend, indeed, I don't think of him as very friendly at all.
All will be well if you think of special friend in the way Yakko Warner
does.
Phil,
No.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Phil Tully [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IFL speed.
Hello all,
Are IFL engines slowed down compared to a GP engine?
Phil
They are supposed to be the same speed as the other engines. Except in the
case of the MP3000, which has a full speed IFL (as opposed to the H30 engine
which is half speed)
On Thursday 06 March 2003 11:04 am, you wrote:
Hello all,
Are IFL engines slowed down compared to a GP engine?
Phil
Rich:
They are not just supposed to be the same speed - they are :-)
(with the exception you noted).
Romney
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:21:10 -0600 Rich Smrcina said:
They are supposed to be the same speed as the other engines. Except in the
case of the MP3000, which has a full speed IFL (as opposed
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 16:09, Alan Schilla wrote:
Using /lib/modules/2.4.7-timer-SMP/misc/qdio.o
Warning: kernel-module version mismatch
/lib/modules/2.4.7-timer-SMP/misc/qdio.o was compiled for kernel
So you force loaded a driver for one kernel into another. That doesn't
work very
Robert,
Since we're chatting... :)
I just validated that the following URLs have at least some part of the 7.2
S/390 platform. Perhaps they can be added as well.
ftp://redhat.netnitco.net/pub/mirrors/redhat/redhat/linux/7.2/en/os/s390/
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Would somebody please comment? I thought all of the necessary modules
that are necessary for using the networking peripherals on a Z-box, or
his relations, were no longer distributed in binary only form.
---
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello again from Gregg C Levine
First define special friend, and second what's a Yakko Warner?
---
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Force will be with you...Always. Obi-Wan Kenobi
Use the Force, Luke. Obi-Wan Kenobi
We were pricing a z800 early last year and I remember somewhere in the reams of
paper we
were given that one IFL on a 0A1 was rated at 192 mips. I checked the entries in the
Public
Library link at:
http://www.tech-news.com/
and they show that a z800 for Linux single processor system is
On Thursday, 03/06/2003 at 12:33 EST, Gregg C Levine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Would somebody please comment? I thought all of the necessary modules
that are necessary for using the networking peripherals on a Z-box, or
his relations, were no longer distributed in
We have a 2066-0A1 and the s390 engine came with an 80mip limit.
-Original Message-
From: Phil Tully [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IFL speed.
Hello all,
Are IFL engines slowed down compared to a GP engine?
Phil
Hi Phil,
We' have a Zserie 900 with 1 IFL.
IBM said me: 1IFL=250 MIPS.
Brgds
Néstor Rubén Acosta
BAPRO Informática Y Comunicaciones SA
Gerencia de Infraestructura Tecnológica
Dto. de Soporte Técnico Mainframe
System Programmer Senior TP
Tel/Fax:54-11-51667831
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
This is most excellent!
I am installing Redhat, and the image files are different..
Should I replace
SYS1.LINUX.TAPEIPL.IKR and SYS1.LINUX.INITRD
with tapeinrd.img tapekrnl.img?
And will the boot process be expecting to read the parmfile in ASCII?
Thanks
Bill
-Original
the oa1 is 80 mips but the ifl is a full 182 mips
-Original Message-
From: Duff Sr., David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IFL speed.
We have a 2066-0A1 and the s390 engine came with an 80mip limit.
Change the names to match what ever you called the files. The parmfile can
be in ASCII or EBCDIC. (At least that _used_ to be true.)
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Beinert, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Harald,
I don't believe Red Hat included a binary RPM for zebra in their 7.2
distribution. Oddly enough, there is a source RPM for it:
ftp://rufus.w3.org/linux/redhat/7.2/en/os/s390/SRPMS/zebra-0.91a-6.src.rpm
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Seifert, Harald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric,
1. Linux/390 looks at all the devices on all the CHPIDs it can find. One
of the reason why it is highly recommended to have the I/O gen only contain
the devices you want Linux to see. Doing so will definitely speed up your
IPL time.
2. Don't know.
3. BogoMIPS = bogus MIPS.
192 ? :)
-Original Message-
From: Noll, Ralph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IFL speed.
the oa1 is 80 mips but the ifl is a full 182 mips
-Original Message-
From: Duff Sr., David [mailto:[EMAIL
I hate to sound stupid but due to age it will be OK. We have just started
installing a z800 which has an IFL engine that is rated at 192 MIPS and a
standard engine rated at 80 MIPS. Are you saying that the IFL speed will
revert to 80 MIPS on this box? If so, then I have been duped big time by
RedHat provide 2 sets of images, one for tape, one for DASD...
07/29/2002 02:57p 4,779,688 initrd.img
07/29/2002 01:28p 2,639,360 kernel.img
07/29/2002 02:59p 4,713,676 tapeinrd.img
07/29/2002 01:32p 2,631,168 tapekrnl.img
I just want to confirm that
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:43:06 -0800, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
Are you telling me that you can guarantee that this will work on any system?
No. But the fact that it works on my 5 year old Toshiba laptop seems a
good indication. Laptops have always been difficult at best, so when
knoppix installed
Loren,
No, your IFL will run at its rated speed, and not revert to 80 MIPS.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Loren Charnley, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IFL speed.
I hate to sound stupid but due to age it
Bill,
Since you're not using VM, yes, use the tape images. Note that this means
the parmfile must be _one_ record long, with a max length of 1020 (??)
bytes.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Beinert, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL
Hi Loren,
From the meetings we had with IBM the IFL speed will remain at 192 mips. The basic
difference between a CP engine and an IFL engine is that the microcode for the IFL
engine is modified to only except Linux workloads not legacy stuff. If there is
more magic at the hardware level it
No not at all. The MP3000 is another special case where the standard engine
is slower than the IFL. Your z800 IFL will run at full speed, just like the
MP3K IFL.
On Thursday 06 March 2003 01:19 pm, you wrote:
I hate to sound stupid but due to age it will be OK. We have just started
On Thursday, 03/06/2003 at 02:19 EST, Loren Charnley, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate to sound stupid but due to age it will be OK. We have just
started
installing a z800 which has an IFL engine that is rated at 192 MIPS and
a
standard engine rated at 80 MIPS. Are you saying that the IFL
So, in theory, the CP engine can also run at 192 MIPS, but is
intentionally restrained?
Garry E. Ward
Senior Software Specialist
Maritz Research, Automotive Research Group
419-725-4123
-Original Message-
From: Bill Stermer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:31
Lpar 1 uses devices 830 and 831 and port 0 of an ENTR card. LPAR 2 is using
devices 832 and 833 and port 1.
I have been able to see where to change all the other TCP/IP configuration
stuff except the device numbers and port number. LPAR 2 should ideally be
moved to LPAR 1 (or they have to
Mark,
Thanks for the answers. I like the BogoMips link you gave. How many times per second
you can do nothing! Now, all I need is the answer to #2.
Actually, the Chpids attached to Linux have access to all our dasd - 900 to 9FF and
A00 to A6C. Only A5F-A6C came up with messages. Could
There are (I think) three models of the z800 where the standard engines run
slower. Also the MP3K H30.
On Thursday 06 March 2003 01:43 pm, you wrote:
So, in theory, the CP engine can also run at 192 MIPS, but is
intentionally restrained?
Garry E. Ward
Senior Software Specialist
Maritz
On Thursday, 03/06/2003 at 02:43 EST, Ward, Garry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, in theory, the CP engine can also run at 192 MIPS, but is
intentionally restrained?
Right. If you pay more, you get different microcode that yields a faster
machine.
Alan Altmark
Sr. Software Engineer
IBM z/VM
As far as I know, that only applies to the 2066-0A1 in the z800 series.
From: Ward, Garry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, in theory, the CP engine can also run at 192 MIPS, but is
intentionally restrained?
On SLES 8 I am trying to get the command line mail program (/bin/mail) to send
mail to a different machine running sendmail. From what I'm reading this
type of configuration is called a null client, it simply routes the email to
another server instead of having a local copy of sendmail running.
So, I looked at the patch, and pulled out the
EBC_TOLOWER(from[last], i);
line, so that my parm line will not be forced to lower case.
Then I have EBCASC(from[last], i);
All well and good, except that
Now everything's uppercase.
debian:/devel/kernel/scratch/linux-2.4.19/arch/s390/kernel#
Jim,
The port number is most likely part of the parms in /etc/chandev.conf
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I think I have the IP stuff figured out...one question remains
Lpar
Leland ...
Another thing to consider is non-printables.
The kinds of parameters we're likely to enter for Linux
would consist entirely of printable characters. So anything below
0x40 (EBCDIC blank space) would imply that it is *not* parm data.
This goes for the high byte as well as all the
A bigger question might be
why must vmpoff be in upper case??
debian:/devel/kernel/scratch/linux-2.4.19/arch/s390/kernel#
cmsfscat -a -f /dev/dasd/0191/disc ipllin.exec
Nice to see someone is using CMS FS!;-)
/* */
iplline = 'CP IPL DEB24M PARM LINE vmpoff=IPL CMS'
say
Another question. I booted Linux in my Linux Lpar. I formatted 4 disks, and I
created file systems on 2 of them using the mke2fs command. Now, the book on the
Marist system that I'm using says:
You can transfer these files by either using FTP or by copying them into and
NFS-mounted
Thanks Jay. The qdio, qeth drivers used are the drivers you indicate. Also,
I cannot say for sure but I believe the timer kernal is 20020502 so I will
look at updating that to the more current 20020708.
Thanks,
Al
-Original Message-
From: Robert J Brenneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Sorry, Eric. NFS requires a network, too.
--Jim--
James S. Tison
Senior Software Engineer
TPF Laboratory / Architecture
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also be sure to have you VM system up to date. I have used this kernel and
driver set successfully on z/VM 4.3 RSU 0202
Jay Brenneman
Alan Schilla
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
te.mn.us
If I understand your question I think you change /etc/rc.config IPADDR_n for
the net config to the different IP address, change the IFCONFIG_n and the
FQHOSTNAME to your new name. Run SuSEconfig then edit your /etc/hosts and
/etc/routes.conf. At least thats what I remember doing under SuSE 2.4.7
Eric.
the HMC is an OS/2 based application. If you can locate the OS/2 desktop,
you should be able to go into the System folder and from there select the
mouse settings folder and change the cursor tracking speed.
Dave Jones
Sine Nomine
Houston
- Original Message -
From: Eric Bielefeld
-Forwarded Message-
From: Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FTP #10179] RPM mirror site for RH v7.2
Date: 06 Mar 2003 12:26:53 -0500
I just validated that the following URLs have at least some part of the 7.2
S/390 platform. Perhaps they can be
On 07.03.2003 at 06:09:43, Duff Sr., David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As far as I know, that only applies to the 2066-0A1 in the z800 series.
There is also 0B1 and 0C1, and the recently-introduced 0E1, all of which are
sub-uniprocessor.
In addition, there is a 0A2 (I think), a sub-dyadic, so
- Original Message -
From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: Kernel patch to add VM IPL PARM support
So, I looked at the patch, and pulled out the
EBC_TOLOWER(from[last], i);
line, so that my parm line will not
Hi Phil,
We' have a Zserie 900 with 1 IFL.
IBM said me: 1IFL=250 MIPS.
Brgds
Nistor Rubin Acosta
Yes, that's correct. The z900 uses the same processor chip as the z800, but it's
clocked
faster and better packaged.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.com
+44 7785 302 803
+49
A bigger question might be
why must vmpoff be in upper case??
Well, I reckon cause the book says so, but you're right about what you say
below. The VMPOFF and VMPHALT processing could convert the command to
uppercase since it is a requirement. How about a nice 1 liner to rememdy
that?
H. I guess I will have to get a release of Linux that has the Claw driver already
built in.
How does a CTC connection work. Can I define 2 escon channels on my MP3000 as CTC
type devices, and just plug an escon cable between them? I know there is a lot of
configuring to be done after
Yes, that's correct. The z900 uses the same processor chip
as the z800, but it's clocked
faster and better packaged.
Think there's a jumper or two we could use on the z8s to overclock 'em? ;-)
Leland
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:23, Post, Mark K wrote:
Brock,
Cool. Thanks for following up on that. (What you found is exactly the
reason I phrased at least some part of 7.2 the way I did.)
Right. :)
I'm afraid at least some confusion occurs from folks downloading
old/incomplete trees (without
On Thursday, 03/06/2003 at 11:06ZE10, Vic Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can someone remind me what the PORTNAME is actually for, again?
There is a physical, architected meaning to it within OSA, but I prefer to
think of it as the moral equivalent of the Accept button on a PC
software install.
On 07.03.2003 at 05:16:13, Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe Red Hat included a binary RPM for zebra in their 7.2
distribution. Oddly enough, there is a source RPM for it:
ftp://rufus.w3.org/linux/redhat/7.2/en/os/s390/SRPMS/zebra-0.91a-6.src.rpm
Just did a RH 7.2
One of the results of the way Linux is developed is that old hardware tends to work
better than new hardware. Try knoppix on a new notebook and it is less likely to work.
At some point I will probably put a second drive in my Dell and try Linux again. I
probably will not try to download a
I was afraid of that, but that's fine. Thanks!
On Thursday 06 March 2003 03:30 pm, you wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:29:07PM -0600, Rich Smrcina wrote:
On SLES 8 I am trying to get the command line mail program (/bin/mail) to
send mail to a different machine running sendmail. From what
Brock,
Cool. Thanks for following up on that. (What you found is exactly the
reason I phrased at least some part of 7.2 the way I did.)
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Brock Organ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
Eric,
What book are you referring to, and what files is the book talking about.
If you booted the 3 starter files for the Marist system, the first thing
that _should_ have happened is a bunch of questions get asked about network
parameters, etc. Did that not happen?
Mark Post
-Original
That's interesting. Since it's so hard to get connected to the official Red
Hat server, I wasn't able to tell if it's there or not. It doesn't show up
on a lot of the Red Hat mirrors.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Vic Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003
Eric,
There are no Linux/390 distributions that include the CLAW driver in the
installation starter files (yet), so that isn't an option.
Yes, you can hook two ESCON channels together to get a communication path
going. It's a _little_ more involved that what you said, but not a lot.
You need to
Well, I've looked in the source code for Hercules/390 again. It appears that
the B220 (SERVC) instruction, which is undocumented anywhere that I can
find, returns the Service Call Control Block. One of the fields in the
SCCB, mapped by the IHASCCB macro in z/OS, is a byte field labelled SCCBRCC.
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 23:38, Post, Mark K wrote:
Eric,
There are no Linux/390 distributions that include the CLAW driver in the
installation starter files (yet), so that isn't an option.
I was going to merge it into the base code but the GPL seems to have
mysteriously vanished and I don't
Alan,
I have a copy of the source, so that's not a problem, if you need it, but
I'm not sure what you mean by the GPL seems to have mysteriously vanished.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott wrote:
I'm trying to automate the install by using the parameters in the
parmfile. I finally have all of them except for the last response:
1) X-Window
2) VNC (VNC-Client or Java enabled Browser)
3) ssh
Choice:Which terminal do want to use?
I can't find the parameter for this one. Did
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 00:07, Post, Mark K wrote:
Alan,
I have a copy of the source, so that's not a problem, if you need it, but
I'm not sure what you mean by the GPL seems to have mysteriously vanished.
The GPL version sorry. It was on their ftp site. If you care to send me a copy
of the GPL
Yes, that's correct. The z900 uses the same processor chip as the
z800, but it's clocked faster and better packaged.
Rather than better packaged let us say packaged differently. The z900
use a closed loop cooling system while z800 is air cooled. Running the
z900 module close to 0c allows us to
I wrote:
Scott (or anyone), have you figured this out yet? I'm revisiting
this install after having worked on other stuff for a while...
I found that some parms have to be in upper case like:
INST_INFO=SAMBA
works and INST_INFO=samba causes loops like yours. INST_INFO=smbfs
like the doc
G'day all,
Just went through the process of building a new 2.4.19 kernel with timer patch
applied (linux-2.4.19-timer-1-may2002 from DevWorks). I wonder if anyone has
seen the /proc/sys/kernel/hz_timer pseudofile, and can describe its function.
Full story, read on...
When building the kernel,
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:27:30 -0600, Lucius, Leland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that's correct. The z900 uses the same processor chip
as the z800, but it's clocked
faster and better packaged.
Think there's a jumper or two we could use on the z8s to overclock 'em?
;-)
Unfortunately it's in the
See:
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/news/pressreleases/2003/z_linux
_grid_03-06-03.html?ca=zseriesme=Wmet=from_zvm
Armonk, N.Y. and Gainesville, Fla., March 6, 2003 - IBM announced today
that
the University of Florida has selected the Linux-only IBM eServer zSeries
800
as the heart
I have two machines running the 2.4.19 SLES 8 kernel. When I put 0 into
hz_timer, I can see the utilization drop off the radar. When set to 1, it
is at the usual .3% (on a MP3000, G5).
According to ESAMON, the machines sit in Q3 58% of the time.
On Thursday 06 March 2003 08:34 pm, you wrote:
Vic,
If the system is really idle, then it would be safe and easy to do a
#cp cpu all trace ext 1004 run
command and see if you're getting a hundred of them a second, or just a
dribble.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Vic Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 20:57, Rich Smrcina wrote:
This is one that is looking to be all over the map. If you have data entry or
transactional type workload on WAS, Linux for zSeries is a great fit. Fast,
small transactions that do some database activity on the back end and send
back a web
Mark,
There is a approximately 200 page manual on installing the Marist Linux on the Marist
Linux for S390 homepage. I'm at home now, so I don't have the bookmark. The files I
was talking about is the tar file that comes with the Marist Linux that is used to
create the file system.
The
Mark,
Thanks. I guess I will have to do another IOCDS change. I think I'll try to install
this one dynamically, instead of with a power on reset.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/06/03 17:40 PM
Eric,
There are no Linux/390 distributions that include the CLAW driver in the
installation starter files
Are IFL engines slowed down compared to a GP engine?
Phil:
Amazing the amount of incorrect info on the list on this subject.
IFLs run at rated speed of the processor. That is to say, they run as
fast as the standard (or general purpose) processor on the system can
run. Basically find the speed
90 matches
Mail list logo
