Stumbled across a interesting putty alternative:
https://github.com/kingToolbox/WindTerm
VERY good vtxxx emulation (good enough for use with OpenVMS which seriously
exploits VTxxx features) and approximately double the file transfer speed.
On 12/8/20, 5:42 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Paul Gilmartin"
wrote:
> z/VM doesn't hide the hardware. In just about all cases, if it won't run
> in an LPAR, it also won't run under z/VM.
I recall a counterexample was OpenSolaris. It wouldn't run in
an LPAR, but only
Should have been. I'll poke the infrastructure guys.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
We're in the middle of moving to ARIN-registered IP addresses in production and
a few hiccups have surfaced with some of our Kerberos infrastructure that got
resolved midday-ish. Give it a few hours for the old DNS entries to time out,
and everything should be ok.
On 2/12/21, 1:15 PM, "Linux
Update your phone to the current IOS. This is a known bug in IOS 14 GA.
You'd think after a while, they'd quit fooling with their MIME implementation.
Ain't broke, don't fix it.
On 12/8/20, 1:20 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Paul Gilmartin"
wrote:
Your mailer or your
On 12/8/20, 5:42 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Paul Gilmartin"
wrote:
> On 2020-12-08, at 14:12:21, Bruce Hayden wrote:
>
> z/VM doesn't hide the hardware. In just about all cases, if it won't run
> in an LPAR, it also won't run under z/VM.
>I recall a counterexample
On 10/7/20, 12:53 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Alan Altmark"
wrote:
> I have talked up DHCP's ability to use a user ID instead of a
> MAC address
Option 61 (the DHCP option that allows the string option) can be any unique
arbitrary string. It can be used to request information for
> If you can login to root at the 3270 console, you can issue an ifconfig (or
> an ip)
> command to change the address, then a route command to set the default route.
Or make sure you set a unique MAC address for each network adapter in the CP
directory and use DHCP to assign a static address
> Can Spectrum Scale (GPFS) be used as the disk to install z/VM?
Implementing a hardware-based FCP target on Linux on Intel or Windows is
possible (the code for Linux is in the iscsi-support package for specific
Qlogic brand FCP adapters on Intel), but I suspect it would take some
development
With z/VM 7.2, IBM has withdrawn support for the last non-English language for
help files and messages. Is there any real need for continuing to support the
German, Japanese and uppercase English help files and messages for SWAPGEN? If
the general consensus is no, then I’ll put that on the list
> I have been asked to look for an alternative to Cisco’s Tetration product that
> will run on s390x, they apparently no longer support the platform.
Tetration is a pretty big package of functions; some of the individual pieces
can be replaced by open-source tools that build and run on zLinux,
> Not so sure about the format, though - the one above is hard to read, and I
> would claim it might be prone to produce errors on all parties involved - e.g.
> whenever we add further fields. Something that correlates the values to a
> field
> name is preferable - maybe something like JSON could
On 7/22/20, 9:29 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Stefan Raspl"
wrote:
> Would people find it helpful if a command is introduced to the
> s390-tools package that will return one or more of the following data
> points:
> 1. z/VM or KVM Guest name
> 2. z/VM Host name
> 3. KVM Host name
> 4.
>I have a customer that recently installed a new z/14.
>They are a relatively small shop, they currently run z/VM and a couple of
>z/VSE guests.
>The z/14 has an IFL.
>The manager asked me 'what can we do with that IFL?'
* Run NJE software on Linux and use it to drive printing for
On 6/1/20, 12:20 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Mark Post"
wrote:
> this was from David Boyes on February 21, 2000:
> "... I have successfully (albeit slowly) booted NT Server 4.x (Intel)
> under bochs on L/390, and successfully run MS Exchange for Intel
> stra
On 4/30/20, 10:41 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rick Troth"
wrote:
somebody please make it stop
+1.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu
Let's also not forget Eric Thomas's other popular tool: CHAT (so that you
didn't have to TELL RELAY AT message. I think of all those bits, only CHAT
survives in the VM Workshop tapes.
Still works after all these years.
On 2/14/20, 6:35 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rob van der
> Is there anyone who has built SMS server in Linux server running on Z/VM ?
Slight variation on the idea: have you considered using something like XMPP aka
Jabber for this? There are good XMPP clients for most smartphones, and C/Python
clients and it’s much simpler to implement.
This article
Ooh, telephony stuff. :)
First: talk this over with your telecom people. It’s possible to do this, but
you’re gonna need them to do stuff to their gear to make it work.
Second: this deals with analog serial connections for maximum compatibility.
This is a case where it’s possible to do this,
On 9/9/19, 11:49 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Jake Anderson"
wrote:
ro ramdisk_size=4 cio_ignore=all,!condev"
I should have seen this earlier. Duh. There's your missing quote - at the end
of the above line.
> On Sep 11, 2019, at 12:04 AM, Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> Ok there was an error with the subnet mask and it is going fine, but find
> some message which am not sure from Linux point of view .
>
> Warnings : can't find installer main page path in .treeinfo
>
> AnacondaY1787 : raise Value
On 9/10/19, 11:58 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Jake Anderson"
wrote:
Is there anyone who have attempted to install redhat from windows instead
of mounting in Linux server ?
Just wanted to understand your experience ? If this is doable or not ?
You may have more
I’m really curious how the embedded systems folks took this latest
“improvement”.
By this argument, Intel and ARM systems running from EPROM are no longer
viable, or at least will require a forklift upgrade - are they expecting to
always copy the entire kernel into RAM and allow it to modify
On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 13:48, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
> HUH? A UNIX with no vi? NEVER seen that before.
> -bash: man: command not found
Well, you did say "minimal". Neither of those are necessary to get the system
multi-user.
Somebody probably intended that particular configuration to
On 5/27/19, 10:48 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Philipp Kern"
wrote:
>Technically the acquired ticket is not two-factor, though. Instead it's
>a bearer token that does not require reauth for the validity of the ticket.
True per se, however the process of acquiring the ticket can mandate
>
> From my perspective, check the the PAM configuration for the SSH server and
> the common-auth* PAM configuration files in /etc/pam.d/. For example, you
> might have a look at pam-oath which handles OTP tokes for 2FA (never tried
> that so far).
Consider also investigating using Kerberos
On 5/24/19, 9:16 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Alan Altmark"
wrote:
>While I've always wanted to see it virtualized and the VM telnet server
>given a way to connect to it (meaning no client/host translations or
>conversions)
Amen to both. Constructing an analogue to a
On 5/23/19, 11:18 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Will, Chris"
wrote:
>Is there any advantage to setting up a terminal server
Yes. Think of it as analogous to attaching the console ports of your discrete
servers without built-in management processors to a hardware terminal server so
you
If you’ve been running in NTLM compatibility mode for nigh on 20 years (1999
was a long time ago), you’ve got much, much bigger headaches to worry about.
There is a chapter in the document I referenced on what to do with NTLM-based
authentication sources. Linux is actually a pretty decent AD
> Is it technically possible to authenticate logon with Active Directory LDAP
AD is just LDAP + Kerberos.
Cookbook for doing this at
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/windows_integration_guide/introduction.
There's also a simple open source CMS-based server in the Bacula source tree
(www.bacula.org) that handles mount/dismount and tape attaches runnable from
Linux guests. Might work for your purposes; Adam and I wrote it ages back for a
purpose like this. I believe it's in a directory called
On 12/27/18, 11:16 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rob van der Heij"
wrote:
> I don’t see how specifying the size should make a difference, apart from
> the last odd blocks when an arbitrary size does not make a full number of
> cylinders.
Apparently there are still a fair number of people
I'm trying to tackle some of the backlogged nits with SWAPGEN, and wanted to
get opinions on a couple of changes.
1. Right now, the size of the swap disk is specified in # of blocks. Would
it be valuable to be able to specify this in megabytes/gigabytes and let
SWAPGEN worry about the
On 10/29/18, 11:37 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Mark Post"
wrote:
> I don't think that matches the reality of the market place, however,
> considering that Red Hat's market share with mainframe customers has been
> _far_ less than 50%.
If you limit it to Z, true. I was thinking of the
On 10/28/18, 6:42 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Harder, Pieter"
wrote:
> In the past IBM has been extremely reluctant to outright own a Linux distro.
> Likely for fear of alienating the Linux people by corporate behaviour. Why
> now?
My guess is that Red Hat probably is the most
On 7/24/18, 9:33 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Brimacomb, Brent (TPF)"
wrote:
> Anyone hosting a LDAP server on z/Linux?Assume you're running OpenLDAP?
Yes and yes. Same as all our other Linux platforms in order to not confuse the
mundanes. Everything's in the same places and it
In passing, I think you said this was a minidisk that was 1 cylinder short. Is
cyl 0 the missing cyl, and the rest of the disk from 1-end the location of the
minidisk? If so, there’s no label on the minidisk part to preserve- you need to
supply one. The minidisk can’t see the real volume label
Haven’t done it myself, so just speculating, but:
Do you have a tape manager, like VM:Tape? Standalone it’s pretty grim, but it
might work better if you were able to manage it via that route. The CA folks
are used to weird tape configurations, and since they go through the DFSMSrmm
interface
On 4/13/18, 3:22 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Gibney, Dave"
wrote:
> I FIND THIS DISCUSSION TROUBLING. It will not likely ever affect me of my
> installation, has we haven't (and unfortunately are not likely to) used
> zLinux and
Given that IBM is now allowing 3rd party vendors to use the SCRT processing
infrastructure to collect usage data, the thought occurred to me: could this be
used to do usage-based pricing for Linux and Linux-based applications? Some
mapping of Linux features/functions to SMF type 70 and 89
We've cracked the mainstream media.
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/2018_cve_list.png
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> Recently we're testing Mellanox 10GbE performance with Ubuntu 17.04 s390x
> on z13. During the test, we found that interrupt affinity cannot be set
> like other platforms.
I/O-related hacks for other platforms are unlikely to work in the same way on
this hardware; the underlying I/O subsystem
> I suspect the solution is not going to be on the LISTSERV side, but on each
> poster's client.
Yeah, that's what I finally concluded as well.
Apparently, Microsoft has removed the option to set the message format sent on
a per-contact basis in Outlook 2016, so the solution that used to
Let’s try that again. Plain text version.
On 6/8/17, 11:05 AM, "David Boyes" <dbo...@sinenomine.net> wrote:
This is a tangent, but more and more postings to this and other lists
appear like this in digest mode:
Date:Wed, 7 Jun 2017 08:53:15 +
From
This is a tangent, but more and more postings to this and other lists appear
like this in digest mode:
Date:Wed, 7 Jun 2017 08:53:15 +
From:Tore Agblad
Subject: Re: Anyone running IBM BigFix client on z?
> From:Timothy Sipples
>To be clear, I'm not asserting that my idea is "useful." I'm just answering
> the question, that's all. The range of new use cases for Oracle Database
>10g R2 for z/OS on z/VM is likely to be extremely limited at best,
>especially given that Oracle
> I do not know if Kimchi can be deployed onto Ubuntu for s390x
> http://kimchi-project.github.io/kimchi/ it looks kind of cool.
If you build from source, it seems to work (they don't know what s390x is, so
no packages). I'd probably agree with Rick, though -- you end up ignoring most
of the
> I gotta say that the option Tim Sipples, proposed of running Oracle in a=20
> zOS guest under VM is a bit more practical than running Oracle 7, I just=20
> find it fascinating that Oracle appears to have abandoned VM, but not MVS.
Oracle had (and I suppose, still have) some large customers
> Am I dreaming to assume that Oracle would actually=20 support 7 on a current
> z/VM?
Probably not. I'm sure if you a) managed to find a copy, and b) threw large
bales of cash at them, they'd find a way, but Oracle 7 was long, long ago. I
doubt any modern application would be able to connect
> I realize that this may be a genuinely stupid question, but is it possible
> to run Oracle directly under IBM z/VM like you can with DB2?
Not anymore. The last version of Oracle to run as a CMS application was Oracle
7. Current versions of Oracle on z/VM all require a Linux guest.
Second the recommendation for RT if you want simple and Linux based. It's
fairly flexible, comes with useful defaults, and is both mail and web friendly
(for those of us who don't spend our whole day buried in a browser). GNATS is
more programmming-oriented; it works, but it works best when
I think we dealt with this already. Check the help files; toward the end of the
help file there are some new options to deal with the new swap signature.
Otherwise, let's take this off list; don't need to bore everyone with the
debugging details.
From The Register:
True believers mind-meld FreeBSD with Ubuntu to burn systemd
'UbuntuBSD' promises the best of several possible bootloading
worlds
http://go.reg.cx/tdml/5c138/5719697f/0227c57e/2kjP
Interesting to see if the System z port appears.
KMCSL, a CSL library for ciphering data using the KM, KMC, MMF, MNO, and KMCTR,
has been added to the VM Workshop 2015 tools tape.
Example code using REXX and PL/I is included.
http://www.vmworkshop.org/node/472
Thanks to Dave Jones for the submission.
Mike McIsaac's contributions to this year's VM Workshop tools tape are
available at http://www.vmworkshop.org/node/471.
Several assorted utilities:
*CHPW630.XEDIT - An XEDIT macro to change passwords in a z/VM 6.3 USER
DIRECT file
*CPFORMAT.EXEC - Wrapper around CPFMTXA to
In 2008, I looked at several options to backup the machines on my home
network. I settled on bacula, because at the time it had the most
options and was the easiest to configure(from my point of view).
Since that time, I've been backing up Linux clients and servers,
Windows servers and
I was in the middle of something else and had to transfer a couple 3390 disk
images to another system. By the time I dumped them with DDR and VMARCed them,
they were just a little bit too large to transfer using FTP - the system has
only 3390 mod 3s, and the files were too big for one volume.
I finally got a few minutes to complete the VM Workshop tools tapes collection.
All the still-readable VM Workshop tapes from 1985 to current are now online
(note the gap from 1998 to 2012 - no VM Workshops were held from 1998 to 2011,
and the 2011 VM Workshop at Ohio State did not produce a
(recall the initial UNIX model had ri= ngs of privileges or was that just
Dante and the Seven levels of hell?)
No, that was MULTICS. UNIX V6 and earlier always only had 1 privilege flag
(superuser/general user) due to hardware I/D protection limitations on early
model PDPs (pre-11), and
Thanks to Perry Ruiter and several testers, version 2.3 of LXFMT is available
for download. This version is a substantial rework of how disk geometry
handling and volume formatting on occurs, which should adapt better to new DASD
types and be a bit more resilient to odds-and-ends that used to
What is the preferred method for backing up and restoring Linux for Disaster
Recovery purposes.
You have to do it in two stages.
Suspend/stop and flashcopy doesn't work reliably/cleanly because Linux caches
the heck out of stuff, so what's on disk at any given second is NOT the current
I'm not sure I like this or not
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ibm-share-technology-china-strategy-
120007774.html
It's unavoidable -- welcome to the post-NSA spying disclosure world. If IBM
wants to continue to do business in the world's largest market, they have to do
it with Chinese
Leap seconds become important when you start reaching back in the time. If
you reach past the most recent leap second insertion point, the wall clock
or TOD clock conversations start being off by one second per insertion.
For many things, that's close enough. For others (e.g. financial
I am in the middle of discussion about how to package and install software =
on Linux for System z. There are people new to Linux involved and things li=
ke InstallAnywhere are coming up. What is your experience with non-RPM
inst= allers?
In a phrase: utterly unacceptable for commercial
I now want to install some tools from the VM downloads web pages. Is there
a= standard or commonly used convention for where such tools should be
stored?= I found some sample instructions for installing pipeddr where the
code was i= nstalled on the MAINT 191 for instance. I would not expect
When building some packages from source with yum-builddep, we are seeing the
following more frequently:
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Sat Aug 10 2014 Patsy Franklin
pfran...@redhat.commailto:pfran...@redhat.com - 2014f-1
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu May 28 2014 Patsy
From:Chu, Raymond raymond@pseg.com
Subject: Looking for a site name that has the following code such as
swapgen.exec
I am looking for the site that I can download such as callsm1.exec, cpfor=
mat.exec and ssicmd.exec to maint and profile.exec, rhel64.exec, sample.=
conf-rh6,
Several folks commented that in these days of WWW-focused access methods, a lot
of new folks don't know what anonymous FTP is. In the interest of easier
access, the tools archive pages now have a link added to open an anonymous FTP
session to the respective file directories from the page for
With Fran Hensler's permission, I've added a final snapshot of the zvm.sru.edu
FTP site that Fran's maintained over the years to vmworkshop.org.
The files are available by anonymous FTP from vmworkshop.org, directory 'sru'.
Best wishes on your retirement, Fran. Somewhere, there will always be a
With a great deal of help from Dave Elbon, Mike Walter, George Shedlock, Dave
Jones and a lot of creative procrastination to avoid doing the stuff I'm
*supposed* to be working on, the VM Workshop tools tape archive now contains
the VM Workshop, Waterloo, and PC SIG tools tapes from 1985 up to
I've just posted new information for SNA's high-availability option (HAO) for
RHEL on System z to http://download.sinenomine.net/publications/hao
If interested, please contact me off-list.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff /
From:Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
Subject: openssl CA certificate maintenance
I (think I) know that openSSL provides two ways to manage certificates:
1. A single PEM file that has all of your CA certificates in it. I say
single as a
matter of practice.
2. A single
But it's the question itself that disturbs me. What would software
(as opposed to a license agreement) do with explicit information about
CPU type?
First guess would be to permit the software to enforce a license agreement. The
honor system is no longer reliable (and never was) in some
From:Mike Shorkend mike.shork...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Running on CP or IFL ?
Is anybody doing that? Running Linux natively in an LPAR?
If yes, why?
There are some applications (*cough* SAP *cough*) that demand every single
cycle you can give them and still want more. VM does add a
I'm still of the opinion that the hardware guys need to step up. The fact that
you have to go and do multitrack writes of count-key-data with zero filled
records for the extent you're interested in seems like a huge waste of
channel bandwidth and controller activity. Unlike the old days we're
I have no idea, if this is being investigated. For myself, I found a different
solution. You can dasdfmt one disk, and then do a flashcopy to all other disks
of the same size that should be formatted.
The Cornell Minidisk Manager code lives again 8-)
However which distribution is currently being used on those 31 bit only
machines? As far as I know there is no plain 31 bit distribution left.
Even Debian switched to a 64 bit kernel since Debian Squeeze.
I'd have to check, but if I remember correctly, most are running late versions
of lenny
If the person is interacting ONLY with the Linux portion, you need to learn a
few things about the mainframe but not a lot -- you could compare the problem
to learning/understanding a new BIOS. The stuff inside the Linux guest is the
same as on other platforms.
If the person is responsible for
After the removal of the 31 bit kernel support it is not possible to
run new Linux kernels on old 31 bit only machines. The only
supported 31 bit only machines were the G6 and Multiprise 3000
introduced in 1999. However after nearly 15 years it seems
reasonable to remove support
OK, dumb question of the day.It's linux right? Why would you keep one of
those machines for Linux when you could go down to best buy and get
something with more horsepower?
Unless you lost the source code or something...
Short answer: by now, the H30/H50 is almost always completely paid
putting a
modern Linux on 15 year old machines seems weird when you can buy an
intel or maybe if thats too much maybe recycle a PC that was running
windows XP?
It's not that weird if it's the most stable system you have and it has enough
spare capacity to do the job adequately. As you know
The largest ECKD volume I've seen anyone define was 100G. Most people just give
up on ECKD disk and use FCP disk for chunks larger than a mod 54 -- too much
hassle to manage LVM devices to get large contiguous chunks.
Somewhat off topic - my storage admins are looking at defining the largest
Another side effect of System z = z/OS mentality. This request makes no sense
at all. If it's a direct attach FCP device, you'll have to run the trace in
Linux, and the GTF utilities don't run there. Look at the CP TRACE command and
then process the resulting CP monitor data if this is an EDEV.
We have a linux guest that got really busy for about 10-15 minutes
nightly. Oracle process. Guest has 2 virtual CPU's defined.
1) Our Oracle DBA (consultant and I believe he is coming from an intel
world) says we need more CPU's. I say no. Who's right and why?
This is not a
Make sure your DVD creator software finalizes the disc before you take it out
of the PC. DVDs aren't readable on arbitrary systems until the disk is
finalized.
It'd be a lot more useful if IBM shipped a DVD image instead of the raw files.
Most DVD creation software automatically does the Right
Ø If backleveling the kernel makes the problem go away, then it's clearly a
kernel logic problem in the s390x port.
Thanks! That was my logic too; it's nice to have it validated by someone who
knows more about the kernel than I do.
When you eliminate the impossible, what remains -- no
I'm not sure what you would expect VM to be able to do here. All OSes pretty
much suspend operations while this kind of what can I do without
decision-making is going on inside the kernel. If the Linux kernel is taking
it's time sorting out what pages are clean/dirty/pageable, the only thing
I have a request for a linux server that will be hosting an oracle data base.
The requestor has requested 8G of main memory and 8G of swap (Our
normal server usually has 1.5G of swap - .5 on dasd and 1G on vdisk).
Does anyone have any thoughts about giving this person 8G of swap ?
First
Thanks for all your answers. I guess I'll give him another vdisk of 4G and if
he
needs more, I can swapgen another vdisk.
Yeah, small incremental increases usually are good thing.
Is one 8G swap device better than 4 2G swap devices ? It's a lot easier adding
another swap device than
One more thing: check to see if your VM LPAR has some XSTOR defined. VM paging
implements a main store- XSTOR- real disk data migration path that helps a
lot with high paging levels and VDISK.
Your VM performance monitor will tell you lots of interesting stuff wrt paging
performance.
Only for z/VM 6.2 and previous..with 6.3, XSTOR is no longer
recommended, and in fact will be the last release to support it.
Good point.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
See the help file for v1310 of SWAPGEN... 8-)
If you haven't already done so, make sure the VDISK system and per-user limits
are set to Infinite in SYSTEM CONFIG and that you have enough VM page space to
back the demand.
I tried using swapgen to define a 2G (4194304 blks) space and it says
Thanks - I ended up having 4 swap disks (1 500M dasd, one 1G vdisk and 2 2G
vdisks - total of 5.5G). I just hope that it's enough. Time will tell.
Just make sure that the real DASD one is used last by making sure the VDISK
ones are prioritied.
. The script is now packaged as a noarch RPM, so that it will show up in
the rpm software inventory with correct versioning.
The code is available from http://download.sinenomine.net/smaclient
Happy holidays to all of you.
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
You can also use LVM itself to mirror the data. See man lvcreate for the -
m/--mirrors option.
Either way, I don't see any reason why you shouldn't use the SVC itself to
mirror the disk(s).
I'd second this approach. One less thing to deal with in software configuration
management.
Yum is the functional equivalent. zypper is SuSE-specific.
I'm on RHEL... so this option may not be available to me.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with
on distributed - except with the security benefits of
full virtualization under z/VM.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.netwrote:
SFS pretty much does exactly that -- for CMS users. You can provide
access to files stored in SFS for Linux via the CMS NFS server
SFS pretty much does exactly that -- for CMS users. You can provide access to
files stored in SFS for Linux via the CMS NFS server. Not exactly
high-performance (dispatching 2 or 3 virtual machines to handle each
transaction is kinda heavyweight), but it works.
Working on something better.
Use sudo.
I have a non-root UserID that needs to be able to execute VMCP commands.
I've tried a lot of things, but it has not yield much success. Any
suggestions??
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
If you want both of the servers live at the same time, you need the content
volume r/o to both systems, or a cluster file system, or to mount the content
from a 3rd machine via NFS.
If you're OK with a single point of failure, you can set up one system as a NFS
master and then mount the
1 - 100 of 2841 matches
Mail list logo