Simon Cozens wrote:
One of the things I plan to do on my way around America after TPC is sit
down with Kevin and DHD and start writing some funky robots. sphinx +
infobot + reefknot + festival -- why hire a secretary when you can write
one? :)
I've been meaning to have a crack at hooking
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:27:47AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Fairly easy to write your own 'Wildfire'-esque system with this. Hook it
into Mister House (open source home automation program,
http://misterhouse.net/) and you could do some really funky things by
just phoning up your house
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 10:41:03PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:59:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 05:43:52PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
nokia 9210
Which is still, AFAIK, unobtainium.
I know someone who knows someone who
* Neil Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 10:41:03PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:59:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 05:43:52PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
nokia 9210
Which is still, AFAIK,
At 21:08 15/05/01 +0100, you wrote:
They already offer it.
You can bar up to ten numbers (IIRC). I don't know how it deals
with withheld numbers. Never checked.
I'm sure I remember reading somewhere that you always send your CID when
you make a phone call. If you choose to withhold the ID, it
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:59:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 05:43:52PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
nokia 9210
Which is still, AFAIK, unobtainium.
I know someone who knows someone who has a test model - I'll
Jonathan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sure I remember reading somewhere that you always send your CID when
you make a phone call. If you choose to withhold the ID, it still gets
sent, it just gets sent with a 'do not disclose' flag set, which all (BT
approved) phones and
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the
stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats in there ... but time has
prevented it etc.
I'd be interested to hear how you get on... I was under the
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the
stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats in there ... but time has
prevented it etc.
I'd be
* Steve Mynott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:59:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 05:43:52PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
nokia 9210
Which is still, AFAIK, unobtainium.
I know
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the
stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats in there ... but time has
prevented it etc.
I'd be
Matthew Byng-Maddick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the
stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats in there
Steve Mynott wrote:
I have heard of people using the D channel signalling to communicate
for free.
I've also heard of phone companies cursing such users and trying to ban
programs that support that.
At least in Germany, there was a program (or several?) that took advantage
of the fact that
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:04:43PM +0100, Natalie Ford wrote:
At 15:09 14/05/01, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Please, would you take the politics elsewhere? Some of us really don't
give a shit either way.
Hear hear! I am getting tired of hitting delete... :)
procmail++
If anybody wants a hand
* Steve Mynott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Personally I find discussion of politics more interesting than
American TV shows about vampires.
I enjoy aspects of the thread about politics, but get bored when it
all goes down old roads. However what i'd really hate is any
restrictions placed
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
and before simon gets there:
use Mail::Audit;
To which Johan Vromans would probably reply:
use Mail::Procmail;
Chacun à son goût.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the
From: Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However what i'd really hate is any restrictions placed
on the topics of London.pm , politics should be just as
welcome as BtVS.
Or, even, Perl :)
Dave...
--
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 09:57:03AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
and before simon gets there:
use Mail::Audit;
Mail::Audit is for *weaklings*. My first act as Benevolent Dictator will
be to ban it, and mandate procmail. I have been discussing this with my
soon-to-be-announced Post
- Original Message -
From: David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:10 AM
Subject: Re: Enough!
Mail::Audit is for *weaklings*. My first act as Benevolent Dictator will
be to ban it, and mandate procmail. I have been discussing this with my
David Cantrell wrote:
a delightfully Heath-Robinson mechanical whatsit which will clip on to
the inside of your letter box, and will reject spam with
GREAT VENGEANCE and FURY.
For GREAT JUSTICE.
Cheers,
Phi how do smurfs make little smurfs? lip
--
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All
Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I enjoy aspects of the thread about politics, but get bored when it
all goes down old roads. However what i'd really hate is any
restrictions placed on the topics of London.pm , politics should
be just as welcome as BtVS.
It is with me.
--
Dave
are kind enough to include a freepost return envelope, the machine
should carefully tear up all the accompanying glossies and return them
in it at their expense.
For great justice...
Martin
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote:
From: Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However what i'd really hate is any restrictions placed
on the topics of London.pm , politics should be just as
welcome as BtVS.
Or, even, Perl :)
Oh, please, we have *some*
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 10:10:23AM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
we are considering funding the development of a procmail-a-like for
snail-mail.
I want a procphone.
--
VMS must die!
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:49:18AM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:33:07AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 10:10:23AM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
we are considering funding the development of a procmail-a-like for
snail-mail.
I want a
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:04:24PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
Heh, don't forget to have a RBL-like list of source telephone numbers.
Definitely. A whitelist too, of course.
And if it's withheld, answer with a terse message and disconnect.
No; many people withhold automatically, it a
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:04:24PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
Heh, don't forget to have a RBL-like list of source telephone numbers.
Definitely. A whitelist too, of course.
Now *this* is why I want programmable mobile phones.
--
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:22:35PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
Definitely. A whitelist too, of course.
Now *this* is why I want programmable mobile phones.
The particularly (interesting|annoying) bit is that recent phones have
hardware capabilities sufficent for a procphone - same code as
* Simon Cozens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:04:24PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
Heh, don't forget to have a RBL-like list of source telephone numbers.
Definitely. A whitelist too, of course.
Now *this*
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:30:59PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
The particularly (interesting|annoying) bit is that recent phones have
hardware capabilities sufficent for a procphone - same code as does the
voice dialling.
Ho hmm... Nokia appealing to Linux coders to help with their new
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:30:59PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
Ho hum. If I wasn't trying to get some work done, I'd grab sphinx and
write some code.
One of the things I plan to do on my way around America after TPC is sit
down with Kevin and DHD and start writing some funky robots. sphinx +
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:38:16PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
Now *this* is why I want programmable mobile phones.
nokia 9210
Bleh, wearable and a GSM card.
Martin
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:04:24PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
Heh, don't forget to have a RBL-like list of source telephone numbers.
Definitely. A whitelist too, of course.
And if it's withheld, answer with a terse message
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:04:24PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
Heh, don't forget to have a RBL-like list of source telephone numbers.
Definitely. A whitelist too, of course.
And if it's withheld, answer with a terse message and disconnect.
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:43:59PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
No; many people withhold automatically, it a legitimate privacy concern.
That's what the terse message is for (reveal yourself, or bugger off).
I suppose it could go to answerphone.
Caller detect doesn't work for international
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:43:59PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
No; many people withhold automatically, it a legitimate privacy concern.
That's what the terse message is for (reveal yourself, or bugger off).
I suppose it could go to answerphone.
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 01:25:23PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Caller detect doesn't work for international calls either.
Untrue. When I get calls from friends in Sweden I can see who they
are.
And when I get calls from Japan, which happens about
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 01:25:23PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Caller detect doesn't work for international calls either.
Untrue. When I get calls from friends in Sweden I can see who they
are.
And
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:48:26PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
No; many people withhold automatically, it a legitimate privacy concern.
??? ... its simple. If they choose to withhold their number I choose to
reject their call.
Okay, whatever, I don't, it's an *option*.
Martin
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:43:59PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
No; many people withhold automatically, it a legitimate privacy concern.
That's what the terse message is for (reveal yourself, or bugger off).
I suppose it could go to answerphone.
Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:43:59PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
No; many people withhold automatically, it a legitimate privacy concern.
That's what the terse message is for (reveal yourself, or bugger
At 12:48 15/05/01 +0100, you wrote:
extension number. I simply don't want people phoning me up who refuse to
own up to who they are before they invade my privacy.
This response inspired by not directed at previous poster i.e. not
personal
Yeah, me neither. Damn strangers, I don't talk to
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Robin Szemeti wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:04:24PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
Heh, don't forget to have a RBL-like list of source telephone numbers.
Definitely. A whitelist too, of course.
And if it's withheld,
From: Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
well .. I believe you have extended the analogy just a little bit too far
:) . .the main reason _I_ decline to answer 'withheld number' calls is
because almost every single one is a halfwit trying to sell me
insurance/glazing/burglar alarms/toilet roll
Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Simon Cozens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:04:24PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
Heh, don't forget to have a RBL-like list of source telephone numbers.
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:04:24PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
And if it's withheld, answer with a terse message and disconnect.
No; many people withhold automatically, it a legitimate privacy concern.
And me refusing to
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:38:16PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Simon Cozens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Now *this* is why I want programmable mobile phones.
nokia 9210
Which is still, AFAIK, unobtainium.
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 01:15:57PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:43:59PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
No; many people withhold automatically, it a legitimate privacy concern.
That's what the terse message is for (reveal yourself, or bugger off).
I suppose it could
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 02:08:31PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 01:38:26PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Ok, so you should have said Caller detect doesn't work for some
international calls either.
But, you see, if a call ID is withheld, you can't tell whether they're
* Steve Mynott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Simon Cozens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:04:24PM +0100, James Powell wrote:
Heh, don't forget to have a
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 02:09:47PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
yeah .. thats fine .. it doesn't work from creaky old strowger exchanges
either (are there any of those left ? ) but there is a subtle difference
between 'number withheld' and 'number
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 05:00:28PM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote:
I have worked as a telemarketer, so feel a bit sorry for them as it's a shit
job, so I just say No thanks and hang up.
You can buy these little devices that emit a canned request to be
removed from the lists which these people are
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 05:43:52PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
nokia 9210
Which is still, AFAIK, unobtainium.
I know someone who knows someone who has a test model - I'll prod on
programmability.
Martin
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:59:32PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 05:43:52PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
nokia 9210
Which is still, AFAIK, unobtainium.
I know someone who knows someone who has a test model - I'll prod on
programmability.
Greg has (had?) one to
Please, would you take the politics elsewhere? Some of us really don't
give a shit either way.
Unless Robin writes a Democracy::Approx module.
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com
Dave Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please, would you take the politics elsewhere? Some of us really don't
give a shit either way.
Dave (the other one) told us to!
--
1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody
On 14 May 2001, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Please, would you take the politics elsewhere? Some of us really don't
give a shit either way.
I did warn them but they appeared to ignore me ...
/J\
At 15:59 14/05/01 +0100, you wrote:
On 14 May 2001, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Please, would you take the politics elsewhere? Some of us really don't
give a shit either way.
I did warn them but they appeared to ignore me ...
Actually I think we can be very proud of ourselves for having had
Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 14 May 2001, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Please, would you take the politics elsewhere? Some of us really don't
give a shit either way.
I did warn them but they appeared to ignore me ...
Can't you just kill on politics subject?
(I will try
At 15:09 14/05/01, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Please, would you take the politics elsewhere? Some of us really don't
give a shit either way.
Hear hear! I am getting tired of hitting delete... :)
-
Natalie Ford
Iterative Software Ltd. http://www.iterative-software.com
Yet Another
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:31:07PM +, Steve Mynott wrote:
Can't you just kill on politics subject?
(I will try and use the subject header in my posts anyway so people
can)
Personally I find discussion of politics more interesting than
American TV shows about vampires.
Concur.
I
61 matches
Mail list logo
