TPC5 Attendees

2001-04-25 Thread Barbie
Just had a look at the registration for the forthcoming TPC5, and notice a fair few London.pm'ers are attending. Nice :) However, also had a look at the Hotel costs. Thankfully I wasn't drinking anything at the time. Seeing as I'm having to pay for this years trip out of my ow

Re: TPC5

2001-01-29 Thread DJ Adams
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 12:28:03PM -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote: > I want tutorial, paper, and talk proposals. Tutorials are a half- or > full-day. Papers are 25 minutes long, and intended to be high-quality > and academicish. Talks can be more informal and are either 25, 40, or > 90 minutes

Re: TPC5

2001-01-28 Thread DJ Adams
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 02:26:07PM +, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > > > > > If you're prepared to consider locations a little out of > > > central London > > > > there are lots of large hotels around Heathrow that have > > > sizeable conference > > >

Re: TPC5

2001-01-26 Thread Chris Benson
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:08:04PM +, David Cantrell wrote: > > Good point. Sometimes it's hard to remember that there is life outside > the M25. Errm ... if you *really* want to have it in the UK, consider > manchester and birmingham. Both have international airports, large hotels > and c

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > potential london clients will be put off dealing with a company not in london > > > > I think Location in this day an age is a little irrelivant. The choice > will be made on quality of service - not where the office is based. > ... and all the

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg Cope
Greg McCarroll wrote: > > * Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Andrew Bowman wrote: > > > > > > From: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels > > > > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us, in >

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg Cope
Jonathan Peterson wrote: > > > > If you're prepared to consider locations a little out of > > central London > > > there are lots of large hotels around Heathrow that have > > sizeable conference > > > type facilities (also handy for the airport!). > > > > FWIW, I know my mother has booked some l

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg Cope
Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > Greg Cope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The Beach. > > For some values of beach not including sand. > Don't start that argument. I spend many an hour - recently opcodes clicked whilst on the beach - and watching three nutters go for a swim ! Greg > -- > Dav

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg Cope
Jonathan Stowe wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > > > > > If you're prepared to consider locations a little out of > > > central London > > > > there are lots of large hotels around Heathrow that have > > > sizeable conference > > > > type facilities (also handy for the a

Re: Conultancy discussion (was Re: TPC5)

2001-01-21 Thread Michael Stevens
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 04:50:39PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote: > * Neil Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >potential london clients will be put off dealing with a company not in london > > Seeing as this was about TPC, interesting subject change :-) > apologise for that i've rejoined (void) and

Re: Conultancy discussion (was Re: TPC5)

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Neil Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >potential london clients will be put off dealing with a company not in london > > > Seeing as this was about TPC, interesting subject change :-) apologise for that i've rejoined (void) and once again regard all mailing lists as one big holistic stream ;-)

Conultancy discussion (was Re: TPC5)

2001-01-21 Thread Neil Ford
>* Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Andrew Bowman wrote: >> > >> > From: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels >> > > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us, in >> > > fact, how difficult

RE: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > > > If you're prepared to consider locations a little out of > > central London > > > there are lots of large hotels around Heathrow that have > > sizeable conference > > > type facilities (also handy for the airport!). > > > > FWIW, I know my mothe

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, David H. Adler wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:28:06PM -, Andrew Bowman wrote: > > From: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels > > > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us,

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Andrew Bowman wrote: > > There are also a number of large and large-ish venues in London offering a > variety of halls and facilities, e.g. Earls Court, Olympia, Wembley > Conference Centre[1], The Business Design Centre in Islington, The Royal > Horticultural Halls, Queen El

RE: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Jonathan Peterson
> > If you're prepared to consider locations a little out of > central London > > there are lots of large hotels around Heathrow that have > sizeable conference > > type facilities (also handy for the airport!). > > FWIW, I know my mother has booked some largish meetings outside of > London. Of c

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll
* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 09:22:07PM -0500, David H. Adler wrote: > > > FWIW, I know my mother has booked some largish meetings outside of > > London. Of course, I don't remember offhand how large, or, for that > > matter, what kind of numbers you're l

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
Greg Cope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The Beach. For some values of beach not including sand. -- Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com Apache, mod_perl, MySQL, Sybase hired gun for,

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Andrew Bowman wrote: > > > > From: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels > > > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us, in > > > fact, how difficult it has been

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread David Cantrell
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 09:22:07PM -0500, David H. Adler wrote: > FWIW, I know my mother has booked some largish meetings outside of > London. Of course, I don't remember offhand how large, or, for that > matter, what kind of numbers you're looking at. Good point. Sometimes it's hard to rememb

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg Cope
Andrew Bowman wrote: > > From: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels > > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us, in > > fact, how difficult it has been to find a place to hold it in London. > > What sor

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Aaron Trevena
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Nathan Torkington wrote: > (update on the OScon in Europe thing--London in August seems to be > a bad idea, so we're looking elsewhere and elsewhen ...) In case anybody is interested the Devon & Cornwall LUG will be helping organise a S/West UK OSS Conference for local busine

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Andrew Bowman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > From: "Paul Makepeace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Where you'll be consulting for a munitions firm? :-) > > Nah, I don't know enough about encryption ;-) > > But then again, ignorance doesn't seem to be an obstacle to most lobbyists > or salesmen! Reminds

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Redvers Davies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels > > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us, in > > fact, how difficult it has been to find a place to hold it in London. > > One of the hotels in London I have h

Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Nathan Torkington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us, in > fact, how difficult it has been to find a place to hold it in London. > Really? Why does this not surprise ab

Re: TPC5

2001-01-20 Thread Redvers Davies
> Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us, in > fact, how difficult it has been to find a place to hold it in London. One of the hotels in London I have had dealings with has conference facilities and over 20

Re: TPC5

2001-01-20 Thread David H. Adler
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:28:06PM -, Andrew Bowman wrote: > From: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels > > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us, in > > fact, how difficult it has been to find a pl

Re: TPC5

2001-01-20 Thread Andrew Bowman
From: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels > capable of supporting such an event. It's quite amazing to us, in > fact, how difficult it has been to find a place to hold it in London. What sort of numbers are we talking about th

Re: TPC5

2001-01-20 Thread Andrew Bowman
From: "Paul Makepeace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Where you'll be consulting for a munitions firm? :-) Nah, I don't know enough about encryption ;-) But then again, ignorance doesn't seem to be an obstacle to most lobbyists or salesmen! Reminds me of ye olde joke: Q. What's the difference between a

Re: TPC5

2001-01-20 Thread Nathan Torkington
Andrew Bowman writes: > London in September would be really good - the weather is generally very > pleasant (not too hot, not too cold, not too wet) and accomodation and > travel is cheaper for those coming from out of town... > > Even October would be okay - so long as it doesn't clash with the

Re: TPC5

2001-01-20 Thread Paul Makepeace
From: "Andrew Bowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Even October would be okay - so long as it doesn't clash with the Liberal > Democrat Party Conference (okay, only joking! :-) Where you'll be consulting for a munitions firm? :-) Paul

Re: TPC5

2001-01-20 Thread Andrew Bowman
From: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (update on the OScon in Europe thing--London in August seems to be > a bad idea, so we're looking elsewhere and elsewhen ...) London in September would be really good - the weather is generally very pleasant (not too hot, not too cold, not too wet)