Re: Technical Meeting - 21st June

> Oh... er... it's only three days to the technical meeting and so far I don't > seem to have any talks for it. Err, I have to produce 3 hours of material so I don't think that the technical meeting would be the right place for it. Apart from that it isn't finished

Re: Technical Meeting - 21st June

Leo Lapworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 07:15:32PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > > Oh... er... it's only three days to the technical meeting and so far I don't > > seem to have any talks for it. > > Thursday.. what, this thursday wh

Re: Technical Meeting - 21st June

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 07:15:32PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > Oh... er... it's only three days to the technical meeting and so far I don't > seem to have any talks for it. Thursday.. what, this thursday where does the time go. Assuming I can make it (have to check something), I&

Technical Meeting - 21st June

Oh... er... it's only three days to the technical meeting and so far I don't seem to have any talks for it. I'll write my "Perl for the People" talk tonight and give that, and I think that Robin wanted to do something. There must be others out there who want to pract

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 05:18:43PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > > > It's a TRAP! > > > > You been playing wy too much nethack recently. > > That was a tough level with

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:26:08 +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:14:41 +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > > > Well, er..., there will be a meeting on the 21st. I spoke to Alex last > > > night and he said we could hold it

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > It's a TRAP! > > You been playing wy too much nethack recently. That was a tough level with comfy sofa and the drinks cabinet. -- Dave Hodgkinson,

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:40:44PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night, > > > I'm sure we can collectively

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night, > > I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your > > passport, we'll even let y

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night, > > I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your > > passport, we'll even let y

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night, > I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your > passport, we'll even let you south of the river and my sofa is very > comfortable and has a well-stoc

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:14:41 +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > > > Well, er..., there will be a meeting on the 21st. I spoke to Alex last > > night and he said we could hold it at State 51. > > Sadly, I can't make it to the meeting after

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:14:41 +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:34:28PM +0100, Peter Haworth > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Can someone please remind me about the technical meeting on the 21st? Now > > that it looks like I might be in London at the time, I

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

Leon Brocard wrote: > Registration might happen pretty soon too. Ooh, goody. People at work (who fortunately will be paying for me to go to yapc::Europe again this year) have said they'll want to start to get down details. Probably better to book hotel, travel, etc. *after* I register for the con

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote: > * Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Redvers Davies sent the following bits through the ether: > > > > > I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps > > > about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

* Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Redvers Davies sent the following bits through the ether: > > > I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps > > about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the > > list will be published. [1] > > Speaker

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

Redvers Davies sent the following bits through the ether: > I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps > about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the > list will be published. [1] Speakers will be told Real Soon Now. Registration might happen

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 07:23:32AM +, Redvers Davies wrote: > I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps > about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the > list will be published. [1] I had an e-mail from Ann Barcomb yesterday saying that my

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

> We'll start at about 7pm and people will be practiving TPC and YAPC::E > talks. I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the list will be published. [1] Red

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:34:28PM +0100, Peter Haworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Can someone please remind me about the technical meeting on the 21st? Now > that it looks like I might be in London at the time, I find I've deleted > all the relevant messages and can't rem

Upcoming technical meeting

Can someone please remind me about the technical meeting on the 21st? Now that it looks like I might be in London at the time, I find I've deleted all the relevant messages and can't remember if there's an archive. -- Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... You're

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

* at 17/04 14:09 +0100 Mark Fowler said: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote: > > surely there should be a better way than this? after all the > > combinations involved are quite numerous. is the notion of something > > that does : > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > if [ -e /usr/bin/perl ]; then >

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote: > * at 17/04 14:00 +0200 Philip Newton said: > > Mark Fowler wrote: > > > 3) Write a set of scripts that are all basically the same but have > > > different #!/usr/bin/perl lines on the top and tell you the > > with a bunch of different extensions suc

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

* at 17/04 14:00 +0200 Philip Newton said: > Mark Fowler wrote: > > 3) Write a set of scripts > > ...with a bunch of different extensions such as .pl .plx .cgi for > combinations of "operating system" + web server that map scripts to > interpreters by extension and/or directory rather than by sh

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

Mark Fowler wrote: > 3) Write a set of scripts ...with a bunch of different extensions such as .pl .plx .cgi for combinations of "operating system" + web server that map scripts to interpreters by extension and/or directory rather than by shebang line... >that are al

RE: Technical Meeting Agenda

From: Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:20 AM > On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 10:15:13AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > Committee Reports: > > Canel Visitation Committee > ^ > > God we're going down market... ;) You didn't think I'd actually have anything to re

Re: Technical Meeting Agenda

On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 10:15:13AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > Committee Reports: > Canel Visitation Committee ^ God we're going down market... ;) Dean -- Profanity is the one language all programmers understand --- Anon

Technical Meeting Agenda

Here's the agenda(!) for the technical meeting on 19th April (a week today) at State 51. Committee Reports: T-Shirt Committee Server Committee Canel Visitation Committee Lightning Talks: Not Matt's Scripts/TT Views - Mark Why Perl Advocacy is Bad - Dave Talks: "101 fun th

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

> 4) Install Apache::Template, Bundle-XML, Template Toolkit 2.02 on penderel > I think this has already been mostly done, but I could be wrong. after much grappling with CPAN shell trying to upgrade us to 5.6.1, this is all done now, though a couple of newer versions of XML modules - not th

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

> over the weekend so if there's anything that needs doing on this i could > have a bash. Just to preempt all I was going to say next technical meeting ;-) Website is going fairly well, if not slowly. The backend bits for churning out the HTML are nearly done (or will be nearly done by

NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

* at 11/04 08:28 +0100 Mark Fowler said: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > I'll also be able to give a quick status update on the website for NMS > (probably at the same time as I'll be using it as my example) what is the status of the NMS thing. i'm liable to have some s

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: > As usual I'll aim at having four or five lightning talks and two or three > longer talks. I could do a lightening talk on playing around with skinning stuff with Template Toolkit's brand spanking new VIEW directive. This would be very quick as w

RE: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On 10/04/2001 at 10:55 +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: >From: Robert Shiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> What is the design that you have agreed on? I will probably want one. > >There are five. So you'll probably want somewhere between one and five of >them :) > >Are the designs on the web anywhere?

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 10:31:11PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > At 22:10 09/04/2001, Neil Ford wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > > > > If anyone doesn't know (or has forgotten), there will be a technical > >

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > As usual I'll aim at having four or five lightning talks and two or three > longer talks. I'd like to give a (preferably "longer") talk about parsing and semantic transformation of Perl code. I promise to think of a less scar

RE: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On 10/04/2001 at 10:55 +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: >From: Robert Shiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> What is the design that you have agreed on? I will probably want one. > >There are five. So you'll probably want somewhere between one and five of >them :) > >Are the designs on the web anywhere?

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote: > * Matthew Byng-Maddick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote: > > > I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he > > > doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowards. > > Can we all

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:04:07AM +0100, Neil Ford wrote: > Do we need to dig up the original meeting notes regarding .pm/colour > combinations or is Simon to 'wing it'? I forwarded it to him, along with the designs that Paul did. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.or

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

dcross - David Cross sent the following bits through the ether: > Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to consider doing talks for us, Righto, I'd like to do talks on the following subjects: o Creating an optimising compiler and interpreter for a toy language o More Graphing Perl (cra

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

Neil Ford wrote: > Do we need to dig up the original meeting notes regarding .pm/colour > combinations or is Simon to 'wing it'? Got em, cheers.

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

jo walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to consider doing talks for us, > > but I can't remember who they were. This is your opportunity to step > > forward. > > i recall promising to do 20 minutes on '101 fun things to do with > Tangram', or something

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:05:51AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: > dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > Mr Cantrell has them I believe. > > I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he > doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowards. > > And yea it shall be so.

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

* Matthew Byng-Maddick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote: > > dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > Mr Cantrell has them I believe. > > I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he > > doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowar

RE: Technical Meeting - 19th April

From: Robert Shiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:19 AM > > > might be nice to have status reports from: > > > > > * The t-shirt committee > > What is the design that you have agreed on? I will probably want one. There are five. So you'll probably want somewhere between on

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote: > dcross - David Cross wrote: > > Mr Cantrell has them I believe. > I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he > doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowards. Can we all join in? :) MBM -- Matthew Byng-Maddick

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

> > > > > might be nice to have status reports from: > > > > > > * The t-shirt committee > > What is the design that you have agreed on? I will probably want one. http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/things/321a.html is a fairly new addition I think. /Robert

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

> Does anyone want to take on the task of being projector monitor and picking > it up from Sussex? Normally I would but i'm buried under the New York contingent for the next few weeks so can't really go anywhere. Red

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

dcross - David Cross wrote: > Mr Cantrell has them I believe. I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowards. And yea it shall be so. Or something. > You're missing the fact that by the meeting you'll have 9

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

* at 10/04 09:15 +0100 Greg McCarroll said: > * Marcel Grunauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:56:28PM +0100, Struan Donald wrote: > > > > > > nowhere we might be tempted to sit by the thames till the wee small > > > hours generating tremendous hangovers :) > > > > "si

RE: Technical Meeting - 19th April

From: Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:17 AM > Dave Cross wrote: > > > I understood that you had delegated the actual work to someone else. > > > > Can you ensure that your vice-chair is able to speak in your place. > > Umm. Ok. > > Somebody give me the design

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

Dave Cross wrote: > I understood that you had delegated the actual work to someone else. > > Can you ensure that your vice-chair is able to speak in your place. Umm. Ok. Somebody give me the designs and I'll get them printed. Talk over. Or am I missing something?

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:56:28PM +0100, Struan Donald wrote: > > nowhere we might be tempted to sit by the thames till the wee small > hours generating tremendous hangovers :) "sit"? IIRC, you tried to lean against a bench but unfortunately were standing between two benches, landing on the gro

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

At 22:10 09/04/2001, Neil Ford wrote: >On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > > If anyone doesn't know (or has forgotten), there will be a technical > meeting > > on Thursday 19th April. It will be at State 51[1] and we'll

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > If anyone doesn't know (or has forgotten), there will be a technical meeting > on Thursday 19th April. It will be at State 51[1] and we'll start at about > 7pm. Details on how to get to State 51 will

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

At 19:16 09/04/2001, David Cantrell wrote: >On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > might be nice to have status reports from: > > > > * The t-shirt committee > >There has been movement on this! > >I, however, will not be able to attend cos I have a visitor from

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > might be nice to have status reports from: > > * The t-shirt committee There has been movement on this! I, however, will not be able to attend cos I have a visitor from the darker regions of the galaxy. -- David Cantrell

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

> Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to consider doing talks for us, > but I can't remember who they were. This is your opportunity to step > forward. i recall promising to do 20 minutes on '101 fun things to do with Tangram', or something like that. am still happy to do this, but also h

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: > Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to consider doing talks for > us, but I can't remember who they were. This is your opportunity to > step forward. i'll do some more music for a bit. alex -- here they come lalalalala la lalalalala

Technical Meeting - 19th April

If anyone doesn't know (or has forgotten), there will be a technical meeting on Thursday 19th April. It will be at State 51[1] and we'll start at about 7pm. Details on how to get to State 51 will appear on the web site... er... soon. Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to cons

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

* at 09/04 16:09 +0100 dcross - David Cross said: > > > p.s Next social meeting is on Thur 3rd May. Suggestions for venues would be > most welcome. nowhere we might be tempted to sit by the thames till the wee small hours generating tremendous hangovers :) struan

Re: Technical Meeting

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > The next meeting is on Thursday 5th April and the next technical > meeting is Thursday 19th April. Suggestions for venues for both are > welcomed. i think some little birdie told me dean was booking the cittie of yorke (or however

Technical Meeting

Just a quick reminder that there will be _no_ technical meeting next Thursday. We've seen far too much of each other and it wouldn't be healthy :) The next meeting is on Thursday 5th April and the next technical meeting is Thursday 19th April. Suggestions for venues for both are welc

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

On or about Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:50:40PM +, Matthew Robinson typed: >Here you go, directions to Torrington. The address is: > >Torrington Interactive >2 Printing House Yard >London >E2 7PR http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?G2M?X=533478&Y=182733&A=Y&Z=1 >Printing House Yard is on

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

[ Editors note I have changed the attachment its contents can be found at http://www.gellyfi.sh/stuff/torridirections.pdf /J\ ] Here you go, directions to Torrington. The address is: Torrington Interactive 2 Printing House Yard London E2 7PR Printing House Yard is on the junction of Old Stre

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

>At 21:04 12/02/2001, Neil Ford wrote: >>>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:59:55AM +, Neil Ford wrote: Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (projector, PA, wireless microphones?) >>> >>>FWIW, damian has (IIRC) requested a vga connection for ny. >>> >>>(will try to

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +, Dave Cross wrote: > And isn't the VGA connection a requirement for the projector? Or the > laptop? Or something other than the room itself? My assumption is that that describes what is needed to connect the projector and laptop. I just had him talk to t

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

At 21:04 12/02/2001, Neil Ford wrote: >>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:59:55AM +, Neil Ford wrote: >>> >>> Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (projector, PA, >>> wireless microphones?) >> >>FWIW, damian has (IIRC) requested a vga connection for ny. >> >>(will try to remember t

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:59:55AM +, Neil Ford wrote: >> >> Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (projector, PA, >> wireless microphones?) > >FWIW, damian has (IIRC) requested a vga connection for ny. > >(will try to remember to confirm this at some point...) > >Your best

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:59:55AM +, Neil Ford wrote: > > Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (projector, PA, > wireless microphones?) FWIW, damian has (IIRC) requested a vga connection for ny. (will try to remember to confirm this at some point...) Your best bet is to

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:49:04 +, Matthew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >How many people can we get in the room at Torrington? I guess we'll > >be expecting ~30. Maybe a bit more. > > 30 people should be no problem, over 40 and it will probably start > getting a little personal.

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

At 10:31 12/02/01 -0500, you wrote: >At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:25:34 +, Matthew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.). >> > >> >I assume we'll need the usual. Projecter, Screen (or white wall!), >> >net connectivity. Can someone

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

>At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:25:34 +, Matthew Robinson ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.). >> > >> >I assume we'll need the usual. Projecter, Screen (or white wall!), >> >net connectivity. Can someone at Torrington please confirm

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

>At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:17:14 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >[kit for Damian's talk] > >> >I'll be able to answer that better after I've visited tomorrow. I >> >strongly suspect that we'll be asking to borrow you prjector again >> >tho' Neil. >> >> Shall I come along tomorrow?

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:25:34 +, Matthew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.). > > > >I assume we'll need the usual. Projecter, Screen (or white wall!), > >net connectivity. Can someone at Torrington please confirm which of >

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

>> >> What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.). > >I assume we'll need the usual. Projecter, Screen (or white wall!), >net connectivity. Can someone at Torrington please confirm which of >that list they can supply. Thanks. Sorry, been busy all morning. We can supply either a sc

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:17:14 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [kit for Damian's talk] > >I'll be able to answer that better after I've visited tomorrow. I > >strongly suspect that we'll be asking to borrow you prjector again > >tho' Neil. > > Shall I come along tomorrow? If you have

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

>At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:59:55 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >I'm assuming that Matt won't want to talk for the _whole_ evening :) >> >So anyone got a short talk they want to give as a support act? >> > >> >Cheers, >> > >> >Dave... >> >> Related question: >> >> What kit are

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:59:55 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'm assuming that Matt won't want to talk for the _whole_ evening :) > >So anyone got a short talk they want to give as a support act? > > > >Cheers, > > > >Dave... > > Related question: > > What kit are we going to need

Re: Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

>I'm assuming that Matt won't want to talk for the _whole_ evening :) >So anyone got a short talk they want to give as a support act? > >Cheers, > >Dave... Related question: What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.). Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (project

Technical Meeting 22nd Feb

I'm assuming that Matt won't want to talk for the _whole_ evening :) So anyone got a short talk they want to give as a support act? Cheers, Dave...

RE: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

At 14:24 06/02/2001, Clyne, Richard wrote: >If it was at Conway Hall could PC Bookshop be persuaded to sponsor it - >after all they are very local. That's a very interesting idea, but I think we have plenty of private sponsors to raise the money for the Conway Hall. Cheers, Dave... --

RE: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

If it was at Conway Hall could PC Bookshop be persuaded to sponsor it - after all they are very local. Richard -Original Message- From: Steve Mynott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2001 13:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship It would also be

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

At Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:49:17 +0100, Merijn Broeren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can jot me down for a personal sponsorship of £50. No way I can > get a corporate sponsorship in time. Most kind. Thank you. Once again we see the awesome power of the Perl communities bottomless pockets :) I've

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

Quoting Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > It would be spectacularly appropriate :) > I agree :-) > > I can't remember exactly what the email I got from them said, but they > were _far_ cheaper than the Commonwealth Institute (which I also > investigated). There was a larger room for ~500 and

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 22:26 06/02/2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > > >Oi! Davorg! stop posting to the wrong list and confusing everyone :) > > You're the third person to point this out to me - and it wasn't me who > started it. The culprit has been identified and told off :)

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

At 22:26 06/02/2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote: >Oi! Davorg! stop posting to the wrong list and confusing everyone :) You're the third person to point this out to me - and it wasn't me who started it. The culprit has been identified and told off :) Dave... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ICQ: 34465585] Lon

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

On 6 Feb 2001, Piers Cawley wrote: It was Piers that started posting to the wrong list guv honest ... /J\ -- Jonathan Stowe | http://www.gellyfish.com | I'm with Grep on this one http://www.tackleway.co.uk |

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Dave Cross wrote: Oi! Davorg! stop posting to the wrong list and confusing everyone :) /J\ -- Jonathan Stowe | http://www.gellyfish.com | I'm with Grep on this one http://www.tackleway.co.uk |

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Robin Houston wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 07:29:53AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote: > > I've been investigating places to hold Damian's meeting and I've already > > got some interesting leads (the Conway Hall looks like it might well > > work out!) > > Conway Hall would be a gr

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 07:29:53AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote: > I've been investigating places to hold Damian's meeting and I've already > got some interesting leads (the Conway Hall looks like it might well > work out!) Great! Can you ship it over to nyc by next week??? dha, still looking... :-/

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

Robin Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 07:29:53AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote: > > I've been investigating places to hold Damian's meeting and I've already > > got some interesting leads (the Conway Hall looks like it might well > > work out!) > > Conway Hall would be a

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

At Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:12:24 +, Robin Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 07:29:53AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote: > > I've been investigating places to hold Damian's meeting and I've already > > got some interesting leads (the Conway Hall looks like it might well > > work

Re: Technical Meeting Sponsorship

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 07:29:53AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote: > I've been investigating places to hold Damian's meeting and I've already > got some interesting leads (the Conway Hall looks like it might well > work out!) Conway Hall would be a great venue, for the name alone! It can't be too expen

Technical Meeting Sponsorship

I've been investigating places to hold Damian's meeting and I've already got some interesting leads (the Conway Hall looks like it might well work out!) The problem with moving from a room in someone's office to a 'real' meeting room is that we'll probably have to pay for it. I'm therefore touti

Re: Technical Meeting Venues

Matthew Jones wrote: > So how do That.pm feel about some northern tyke scuttling down to join you > for the odd beer and tech meeting on a sort of semi-regular basis? For the love of God NO! Every time you're down in This I end up the next morning feeling fragile wearing nothing but a traffic c

Re: Technical Meeting Venues

* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > From: Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: 29 January 2001 15:34 > > > > > just think of the sitcom possibilities if i lived above you > > > Dave? heh? heh? ;-) ;-) > > > > Bit tricky that

Re: Technical Meeting Venues

* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > As I skuttled off to Nottingham[1] this morning, Philip Newton wrote: > > > that I wrote: > > > > > [2] Bath.pm roots showing. We used to discuss a fair amount > > > of technical (but not necessary perl related) stuff. From > > > this, I quickly progr

RE: Technical Meeting Venues

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: > From: Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 29 January 2001 15:34 > > > just think of the sitcom possibilities if i lived above you > > Dave? heh? heh? ;-) ;-) > > Bit tricky that. What with us living in a house and all that. > We have seag

Re: Technical Meeting Venues

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:57:00PM +, Chris Benson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:48:33PM +, Richard Clamp wrote: > > > > I'm from Birmingham damnit[0], which though north of the M25, is nowhere near > > as grim as proper up north. > > Oi! where you calling grim http://www.cantrell

Re: Technical Meeting Venues

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:48:33PM +, Richard Clamp wrote: > > I'm from Birmingham damnit[0], which though north of the M25, is nowhere near > as grim as proper up north. Oi! where you calling grim ... though 5-7 hour GNER magical mystery tours instead of the usual 3h is pretty grim. It m

  1   2   >