Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
| I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
| of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
| latex
Hi all,
you won't believe it, but some people are paranoid
enough to think that using LyX to write a document
somehow 'infects' the document with the GPL.
That is, the document and its contents automatically
become GPL too. I know this is stupid.
Could anyone point me to a suitable legal document
Iwo Mergler wrote:
Could anyone point me to a suitable legal document
which states this isn't the case under GPL? It would
help me resolve a dispute I still can't belive I'm having.
The GPL itself?
§0: [...] Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are
not covered by this
Dear LyX developers,
thank you (again) for your LyX development.
After some pause I'm again with LyX (hoping) to stay :-)
Since it is such a good program I'd liek to share it with some friends who are
still on Win32 platform.
It's not easy to persuade Word user in a LaTeX/TeX world, but LyX
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 6:45 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 6:27 pm, Timm Danker wrote:
Angus,
I just realised that I get the same error message regardless
whats in the lyxpreview2bitmap.sh. its sufficient that it is just
there in the ./lyx/scripts directory. its not
Angus Leeming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No. But a gtk port has made progress. (gtk is licensed under the LGPL
and has been ported to Win32.) The main LyX window is functional and
a couple of the dialogs have been ported. The rest of the dialogs are
from the XForms frontend.
Thank you for
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Angus Leeming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No. But a gtk port has made progress. (gtk is licensed under the LGPL
and has been ported to Win32.) The main LyX window is functional and
a couple of the dialogs have been ported. The rest of the dialogs are
from the
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:01:24 +0200
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason why wxWidgets toolkit is (somehow) avoided?
Well, I think someone would have to do it :)
It's not that I'm pushing it, but, imho, it looks like a mature
multi-platform toolkit with a fair licence.
The more
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 11:00:13AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
My make of up-to-date LyX-CVS ends with:
| Me too (well, something similar) gcc 3.5.0cvs
I don't get either.
I need this, to successfully compile CVS:
Index:
Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 11:00:13AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
My make of up-to-date LyX-CVS ends with:
| Me too (well, something similar) gcc 3.5.0cvs
I don't get either.
| I need this,
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
Georg I found and fixed some bugs during this process (also the
Georg environment nesting bug that was the only remaining one that
Georg showed up when
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars What is this?
Lars TOC_top/ru_TOC_top.lyx
TOC_top files are documents with the proper language setting and title
that are use to generate the corresponding TOC file.
Does this answer your question?
JMarc
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 11:00:13AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
My make of up-to-date LyX-CVS ends with:
| Me too (well, something similar) gcc 3.5.0cvs
I don't get
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Timm confirms that this works on Win32 also, so it seems that
Angus we have a way out: when invoking an external script, we should
Angus wrap the argument in quotes (using QuoteName) if we have
Angus replaced one of the placeholders $$a,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars What is this?
| Lars TOC_top/ru_TOC_top.lyx
| TOC_top files are documents with the proper language setting and title
| that are use to generate the corresponding TOC file.
| Does this
Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| autogen.sh:
| Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.53
| gmake:
| [...snip...]
| gmake[4]: Entering directory `/home/lahaye/SOFTWARE/lyx-devel/boost/libs/regex/src'
| source='cpp_regex_traits.cpp' object='cpp_regex_traits.lo' libtool=yes \
|
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Timm confirms that this works on Win32 also, so it seems that
Angus we have a way out: when invoking an external script, we
should Angus wrap the argument in quotes (using QuoteName) if we
have Angus replaced one of the placeholders $$a, $$i, $$o, $$p,
$$s,
Lars Gullik Bjnnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| Is there any reason why wxWidgets toolkit is (somehow) avoided?
Only that nobody has done, or been interested enough to do the actual
work.
Good to know that. Seeing qt port done, hearing about gtk...I thought maybe is
something wrong with
Karsten Heymann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The more natural Toolkit for LyX would be FLTK I think, because it
seems to be quite close to xforms. But that would have to be done as
well...
Why do you think it is more 'natural'?
Since LyX is going into GUI-independence territory, can we say
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Since LyX is going into GUI-independence territory, can we say that some
| toolkit is 'more natural'?
I'd say that a C++ toolkit is more natural, other than that it
really doesn't matter...
--
Lgb
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars | Lars What is this?
Lars | Lars TOC_top/ru_TOC_top.lyx
Lars | TOC_top files are documents with the proper language setting
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus The alternative is to escape 'special chars', so 'Dokumente und
Angus Einstellungen' becomes 'Dokumente\ und\ Einstellungen'.
This is probably more complicated and error prone.
JMarc
Karsten Heymann wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:01:24 +0200
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason why wxWidgets toolkit is (somehow) avoided?
Well, I think someone would have to do it :)
It's not that I'm pushing it, but, imho, it looks like a mature
multi-platform toolkit
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus The alternative is to escape 'special chars', so 'Dokumente
und Angus Einstellungen' becomes 'Dokumente\ und\ Einstellungen'.
This is probably more complicated and error prone.
Agreed. So we need:
string const subst_filename(string const input,
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| autogen.sh:
| Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.53
| gmake:
| [...snip...]
| gmake[4]: Entering directory `/home/lahaye/SOFTWARE/lyx-devel/boost/libs/regex/src'
| source='cpp_regex_traits.cpp' object='cpp_regex_traits.lo'
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Grand. Patch committed.
Angus Jean-Marc, attached is the equivalent patch against 1.3.x.
Angus Please add to your list of pending patches.
Angus, I think you have been too fast for me there... I did not have
time to tell you so, but I do
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars | Lars What is this?
| Lars | Lars TOC_top/ru_TOC_top.lyx
| Lars | TOC_top
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Should we be interested in supporting a frontend based on Yet Another
| Toolkit? IMO, no. We should not waste our effort carelessly. The goal
| should be a more powerful tool accessible to more people.
But we won't actively hinder it.
Similar to the
Hello Gour,
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:15:07 +0200
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karsten Heymann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The more natural Toolkit for LyX would be FLTK I think, because it
seems to be quite close to xforms. But that would have to be done as
well...
Why do you think it
Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, it must be FreeBSD that is the problem
Is uintmax_t a macro? Or uint32_t?
Has inttypes.h on FreeBSD changed recently?
(upgraded libc perhaps?)
What is uintmax_t/uint32_t typdeffed/defined as in inttypes.h
| This is what I get:
| $ grep -n uintmax_t
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Somehow my lyxdoc checkout don't have all the files...
Lars I don't know why...
Lars But now... when I check:
Lars ll -aR | wc -l 121
Lars and
Lars find . -name \*.lyx | wc 80 80 1313
Lars Is this correct or am I missing 5 files.
Anyone have any ideas about this? Strangely, this is only happening on one
of my Cygwin systems.
make install-recursive
make[5]: Entering directory `/home/ksylvan/src/lyx-build/src/frontends/xforms'
Making install in forms
make[6]: Entering directory
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| fantomas[ssh]: ls -r | grep -v '\.lyx$'
| TOC_top
missing
| README.Documentation
missing
| platypus.eps
missing
| mobius.eps
missing
| Makefile.depend
is this really in lyxdoc at all?
| Makefile
missing, cannot just copy
|
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus, I think you have been too fast for me there... I did not have
time to tell you so, but I do not think this patch is appropriate
after all.
Then I'll revert it this evening.
1/ the focus problem that this patch fixes is gone with qt 3.3.x.
This is good,
Lars Gullik Bjnnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'd say that a C++ toolkit is more natural, other than that it
really doesn't matter...
One more point. Although I know that the choice of GUI toolkit is evoking
religious war, I'm just thinking that at the present moment there are (maybe)
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars | Makefile.depend
Lars is this really in lyxdoc at all?
No, it is autogenerated by a ad-hoc dependency tracking mechanism.
JMarc
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus, I think you have been too fast for me there... I did not
have time to tell you so, but I do not think this patch is
appropriate after all.
Angus Then I'll revert it this evening.
Thanks.
1/ the focus
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Anyone have any ideas about this? Strangely, this is only happening on one
| of my Cygwin systems.
have you tried a clean distclean maintianerclean to see if that
helps?
Or are there different versions of cygwin?
--
Lgb
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Anyone have any ideas about this? Strangely, this is only happening
on one of my Cygwin systems.
{ [ ../../../../../lyx/src/frontends/xforms/forms != . ]
[ ! -a form_aboutlyx.fd ]
[: form_aboutlyx.fd: unknown operand
Lars has added this bit of magic recently to
Angus Leeming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So, should we be interested in supporting a gtk frontend in the 1.5.x
cycle? IMO, yes. If development goes the way I've outlined above,
then it may also make sense to consider 'retiring' the XForms
frontend.
Should we be interested in supporting a
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:56:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Ok, it must be FreeBSD that is the problem
No, I have recently started seeing a very similar problem on Linux.
/usr/local/gcc-cvs/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src
-I../../../../boost -I/usr/X11R6/include
Gour wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'd say that a C++ toolkit is more natural, other than that it
really doesn't matter...
One more point. Although I know that the choice of GUI toolkit is
evoking religious war,
I don't think so. The Qt frontend exists, so we
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:56:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Ok, it must be FreeBSD that is the problem
| No, I have recently started seeing a very similar problem on Linux.
Completely different you mean...
| /usr/local/gcc-cvs/bin/g++
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Good. Note that this focus thing is not confined to the Mac.
Angus The change worked also under linux. I take it that qt 3.3.x
Angus does the right thing for all supported OSes?
Did you notice a difference with your patch? I did not see any.
Yes. I followed
This patch adds code for LyX/Mac to find its locale files correctly
and changes the default user directory from .lyx to
~/Library/Preferences/LyX (for Qt/Mac too).
Lars, this changes some of your code in message.C. Is it OK with you?
JMarc
Index: src/ChangeLog
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Good. Note that this focus thing is
Angus not confined to the Mac. The change worked also under linux. I
Angus take it that qt 3.3.x does the right thing for all supported
Angus OSes?
Did you notice a difference
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| My copy of 'unix in a nutshell' tells me that 'test -a' is
| specific to ksh, so this is going to break on systems where sh
| means sh, not bash.
So I can use -e instead?
Not if you want plain old 'sh' to understand
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Sure it did. Or do you have a goblin in your box?
(you installed gcc 3.5 right? But I don't see these errors with 3.5...)
I previously compiled CVS lyx fine with the same GCC version. A cvs
update then caused it to fail.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Good. Note that this focus thing
is Angus not confined to the Mac. The change worked also under
linux. I Angus take it that qt 3.3.x does the right thing for all
supported Angus
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This patch adds code for LyX/Mac to find its locale files correctly
| and changes the default user directory from .lyx to
| ~/Library/Preferences/LyX (for Qt/Mac too).
| Lars, this changes some of your code in message.C. Is it OK with you?
It
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Good. Note that this focus thing is not confined to the Mac.
Angus The change worked also under linux. I take it that qt 3.3.x
Angus does the right thing for all supported OSes?
Did you notice a difference with your patch? I did not see any.
Yes. I followed the
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| My copy of 'unix in a nutshell' tells me that 'test -a' is
| specific to ksh, so this is going to break on systems where sh
| means sh, not bash.
So I can use -e instead?
|
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Sure it did. Or do you have a goblin in your box?
(you installed gcc 3.5 right? But I don't see these errors with 3.5...)
| I previously compiled CVS lyx fine with the same GCC version.
Bennett Helm wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Good. Note that this focus thing is not confined to the
Mac. Angus The change worked also under linux. I take it that qt
3.3.x Angus does the right thing for all supported OSes?
Did you notice a difference with your patch? I did not see
Angus Leeming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Angus!
The Qt toolkit is cross platform and the frontend works. We'll keep
it working. It's up to you to decide whether you want to help port
lyx to another toolkit.
The whole thread has started (see the subject) with the question of win32 port.
Angus Leeming wrote:
The more natural Toolkit for LyX would be FLTK I think, because it
seems to be quite close to xforms. But that would have to be done as
well...
I don't think that is true any longer. The LyX core sees absolutely
nothing of the GUI toolkit. All toolits are, therefore,
Gour wrote:
Qt is not free for win32 and therefore further development is stalled, and
my initial point in bringing wxWidgets as a free cross-platform toolkit
was with the idea to solve the future of win32 port as a mean of further
propagation of LyX LaTeX/TeX typesetting in a win32 world
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| My copy of 'unix in a nutshell' tells me that 'test -a' is
| specific to ksh, so this is going to break on systems where sh
| means sh, not bash.
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've tried the patch on LyX/Mac. While it doesn't seem to affect
the focus issue (which, as Jean-Marc noted, is not a problem with
qt-3.3.x), it does change dialogs to be always on top -- to be
modal -- which is not desirable on the Mac, at
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does old 'sh' has a test built-in?
| No, the bourne shell uses /bin/test.
| test -f file ...
| [ -f file ] ...
| are equivalent. Is that what you mean?
No, I just thought that /bin/test had '-e', but I use '-r' instead in
the what I
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Incidentally, Angus: Since xforms was the base of fltk, it aims to
be highly compatible to xforms (synonymous functions etc.). It even
provides a tool for converting *.fd files to fltk dialogs. Do you
know if this statement is still true for xforms 1.x? Just
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars, this changes some of your code in message.C. Is it OK with you?
Lars It might be
Lars I am not overly fond of the inOSXbundle stuff.
OK, let's see...
Lars | char * old = strdup(setlocale(LC_ALL, 0)); | char * n =
Lars
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:12:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
of gcc or lyx?
lyx
nothing in lyx/boost changed... automake/autoconf differences?
I haven't changed versions of that.
Your is some syntax problem, the one on FreeBSD is redefinition of a
type.
Either way, I can't do any
On Jun 2, 2004, at 10:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've tried the patch on LyX/Mac. While it doesn't seem to affect
the focus issue (which, as Jean-Marc noted, is not a problem with
qt-3.3.x), it does change dialogs to be always on top -- to
Angus Leeming wrote:
However, fltk version 2 no longer aims to provide this compatibility.
Hmm, the fltk2 docs still state this to be true, and fluid also seems to
work with fltk2. Moreover I found this message (and nothing contrary):
http://www.fltk.org/newsgroups.php?s1+gfltk.general+Gfltk+v6
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've tried the patch on LyX/Mac. While it doesn't seem to affect
the focus issue (which, as Jean-Marc noted, is not a problem with
qt-3.3.x), it does change dialogs to be always on top -- to be
modal -- which is
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Perhaps there's some vague hope, although the development of
Juergen this seems to be very slow:
Juergen http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net/qt3-win32/
Did anyone try that? How far is it from usefulness? This is not very
clear from
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus I'm not very good at bitwise fields, but a quick google turns
Angus up this if you want to ensure that your dialog is always on
Angus top. (QDialog dervies publicly from QWidget.)
Angus QWidget::setWFlags(Qt::WType_Dialog |
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:12:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
of gcc or lyx?
| lyx
nothing in lyx/boost changed... automake/autoconf differences?
| I haven't changed versions of that.
Your is some syntax problem, the one on FreeBSD is
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Did anyone try that? How far is it from usefulness? This is not
very clear from the status pages or the mailing lists.
Juergen Indeed. I wouldn't count on it yet. The clearest statement I
Juergen
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:19:50PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
How can I help when you clam up on the info I need!
What info do you want?
john
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:56:23AM +0100, Iwo Mergler spake thusly:
Hi all,
you won't believe it, but some people are paranoid
enough to think that using LyX to write a document
somehow 'infects' the document with the GPL.
Of course this is true... and viruses infect your machine through
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:19:50PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
How can I help when you clam up on the info I need!
| What info do you want?
Tell me everything.
But something _must_ have change I can't belive that it is lyx (sure
it could be ...)
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:35:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
But something _must_ have change I can't belive that it is lyx (sure
it could be ...)
Nothing's changed, honest. No RPMs have been updated. GCC 3.5 is the one
that previously compiled lyx successfully. LyX is CVS up to date.
Lars?
--
Angus
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:35:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
But something _must_ have change I can't belive that it is lyx (sure
it could be ...)
| Nothing's changed, honest. No RPMs have been updated. GCC 3.5 is the one
| that previously
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:48:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
How updated are your 3.5?
Very. The problem is that the gettext.m4 changes are doing:
typedef int ptrdiff_t
into config.h. However, the check is going wrong because of course
ptrdiff_t is defined fine on my system, so you e
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:48:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
How updated are your 3.5?
| Very. The problem is that the gettext.m4 changes are doing:
| typedef int ptrdiff_t
| into config.h. However, the check is going wrong because of course
|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| I do this:
| #!/bin/bash
| export PATH=/opt/gcc-head/bin:$PATH
| export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/gcc-head/lib
| exec bash -i
| Does that make a difference? (change to fit of course)
| Do you have any clues why configure thinks your ptrdiff_t is
|
Angus Leeming wrote:
Angus Yes. I followed the prescription outlined in the bug report.
Angus Without the patch, keyboard input went to the lyx screen.
With Angus the patch, it went to the index dialog.
And does it give you a 'stay on top' behaviour?
Yes, so I've reversed the patch.
Am I
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:46:51PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
I can only find ptrdiff_t in linux/types.h and in
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.3.2/include/stddef.h
(which leads me to suspect your way of calling the compiler...)
It seems that STDC_HEADERS is undefined with your
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:46:51PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
I can only find ptrdiff_t in linux/types.h and in
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.3.2/include/stddef.h
(which leads me to suspect your way of calling the compiler...)
It seems
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 12:31:01AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Ha! I win!
I gracefully concede (this one).
But only because I appear to have burnt my nose.
john
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, it must be FreeBSD that is the problem
Is uintmax_t a macro? Or uint32_t?
Has inttypes.h on FreeBSD changed recently?
(upgraded libc perhaps?)
What is uintmax_t/uint32_t typdeffed/defined as in inttypes.h
| This is what I get:
|
Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, it must be FreeBSD that is the problem
Is uintmax_t a macro? Or uint32_t?
Has inttypes.h on FreeBSD changed recently?
(upgraded libc perhaps?)
What is uintmax_t/uint32_t typdeffed/defined
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
>
| I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
| of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
| latex
Hi all,
you won't believe it, but some people are paranoid
enough to think that using LyX to write a document
somehow 'infects' the document with the GPL.
That is, the document and its contents automatically
become GPL too. I know this is stupid.
Could anyone point me to a suitable legal document
Iwo Mergler wrote:
> Could anyone point me to a suitable legal document
> which states this isn't the case under GPL? It would
> help me resolve a dispute I still can't belive I'm having.
The GPL itself?
§0: "[...] Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are
not covered by
Dear LyX developers,
thank you (again) for your LyX development.
After some pause I'm again with LyX (hoping) to stay :-)
Since it is such a good program I'd liek to share it with some friends who are
still on Win32 platform.
It's not easy to persuade Word user in a LaTeX/TeX world, but LyX
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 6:45 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 June 2004 6:27 pm, Timm Danker wrote:
> > Angus,
> > I just realised that I get the same error message regardless
> > whats in the lyxpreview2bitmap.sh. its sufficient that it is just
> > there in the ./lyx/scripts directory.
Angus Leeming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> No. But a gtk port has made progress. (gtk is licensed under the LGPL
> and has been ported to Win32.) The main LyX window is functional and
> a couple of the dialogs have been ported. The rest of the dialogs are
> from the XForms frontend.
Thank you
Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> No. But a gtk port has made progress. (gtk is licensed under the LGPL
>> and has been ported to Win32.) The main LyX window is functional and
>> a couple of the dialogs have been ported. The rest of the dialogs are
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:01:24 +0200
Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any reason why wxWidgets toolkit is (somehow) avoided?
Well, I think someone would have to do it :)
> It's not that I'm pushing it, but, imho, it looks like a mature
> multi-platform toolkit with a fair licence.
The
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 11:00:13AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
My make of up-to-date LyX-CVS ends with:
| Me too (well, something similar) gcc 3.5.0cvs
I don't get either.
I need this, to successfully compile CVS:
Index:
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 11:00:13AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>>
My make of up-to-date LyX-CVS ends with:
>>>
>> | Me too (well, something similar) gcc 3.5.0cvs
>> I don't get
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
Georg> I found and fixed some bugs during this process (also the
Georg> environment nesting bug that was the only remaining one that
Georg>
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> What is this?
Lars> TOC_top/ru_TOC_top.lyx
TOC_top files are documents with the proper language setting and title
that are use to generate the corresponding TOC file.
Does this answer your question?
JMarc
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 11:00:13AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
My make of up-to-date LyX-CVS ends with:
| Me too (well, something similar) gcc 3.5.0cvs
I don't get
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
