Re: tex2lyx Feature Request

Jean-Marc Let's make it --list-textclasses -l that was just an example. The request concerns tex2lyx. I am getting the available textclasses out of it. el n 30/06/2023 11:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 30/06/2023 à 11:07, Dr Eberhard Lisse a écrit : >> so I wonder if one should

Re: tex2lyx Feature Request

Le 30/06/2023 à 11:07, Dr Eberhard Lisse a écrit : so I wonder if one should not implement a similar switch like --list-modules [--list-layouts, right?] or similar which would do just that and return something like AEA IEEEtran-CompSoc IEEEtran-TransMag [

tex2lyx Feature Request

Hi, I am doing an exercise of translating OpenOffice formatted files into Lyx via pandoc and tex2lyx. The LyX file is readable but when I use scrlettr it wants Koma Letter V1 which is not installed. I had to do find /Applications/LyX.app/ -name 'scrl*' to find /Applications/L

Re: feature request: text search in LaTex Preamble

On 03/31/2018 04:32 PM, David Pesetsky wrote: > I often find myself hunting for something in the preamble and having to cut > and paste the contents of the "Document Settings/LaTex Preamble" window into > a text processing program to search for what I want. (And then I sometimes > tinker with it

feature request: text search in LaTex Preamble

I often find myself hunting for something in the preamble and having to cut and paste the contents of the "Document Settings/LaTex Preamble" window into a text processing program to search for what I want. (And then I sometimes tinker with it in the text processing program, forgetting that this

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

l" Cc: "Richard Heck" ; "lyx-users Users" ; Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file type* in LyX under Preferences > File Handling > Fi

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

: "Alex Vergara Gil" Cc: "Richard Heck" ; "lyx-users Users" ; Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file type* in LyX under Preferences >

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

"Alex Vergara Gil" writes: > From: "Richard Heck" > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM >>> I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via >>> defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which >>> "converts" plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. i

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: "Richard Heck" Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM >> I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via >> defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which >> "converts" plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. it defines the >> call to compile the

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code > within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? > This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by > matp

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 04:57 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: "Alex Vergara Gil" writes: Richard you obviously miss the point here, or I was not very clear! it is not a different format, is a facility to have python scripts running within LyX framework, you have to see ipython notebook to understand what I m

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 05:34 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: *From:* Richard Heck *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code wit

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

"Alex Vergara Gil" writes: > From: Richard Heck > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM > > > On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of > python code within its own framework, like ipython n

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allow

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package.

[Feature Request] python binding

From: "Steve Litt" Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:35 PM On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:36:29 -0500 "Alex Vergara Gil" wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to

[Feature Request] quality ePub export: Was [Feature Request] python binding

On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:36:29 -0500 "Alex Vergara Gil" wrote: > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python > code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? > This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one > produced b

[Feature Request] python binding

Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package. I know there already exists a similar binding for R

Re: Feature request

Thanks Jim. I just responded to your feature request. Let's continue the conversation on the trac ticket. Scott On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Jim Rockford wrote: > Thanks for your attention Scott. I just submitted the enhancement request > you suggested. > > Best, > Jim

Re: Feature request

n explicitly. I find this a bit of a nuisance and thus > make the feature request. > > Thanks to the Lyx team for their great work and their consideration of user > feature requests. > > Jim

Feature request

specify the dimension explicitly. I find this a bit of a nuisance and thus make the feature request. Thanks to the Lyx team for their great work and their consideration of user feature requests. Jim

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 16/10/2013 7:02 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Guenter Milde users.sf.net> writes: On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: ... However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth of the i

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Guenter Milde users.sf.net> writes: > > On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: > >> Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: > > ... > > >> However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth > >> of the initial Table of contents.

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: >> Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: ... >> However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth >> of the initial Table of contents. > This is controlled in LyX by going to Document > Sett

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: Nevertheless I have continued to work in TeXworks to see how far I can get. With the Tables of Contents and have got quite far… The new mini TOC’s seem to be behaving ok, and respond to depth changes, but the i

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 14/10/2013 4:08 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Andrew Parsloe clear.net.nz> writes: On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I tr

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: > Nevertheless I have continued to work in TeXworks to see how far I can get. > With the Tables of Contents and have got quite far… > The new mini TOC’s seem to be behaving ok, and respond to depth changes, > but the initial Table of Contents still lists eve

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Andrew Parsloe clear.net.nz> writes: > > > On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > >> Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. > >> Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly > >> suggested I try to find out about installi

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing packages with MikTeX. Having so far managed to produce a

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing packages with MikTeX. Having so far managed to produce a pretty impressive document (if only by weight) in

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: > > stefano franchi gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton > yahoo.co.uk> wrote:I found the "package" to do the job called Minitoc. >  Unfortunately being anignorant beginner in this field  I don't know how to >

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

stefano franchi gmail.com> writes: > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> wrote:I found the "package" to do the job called Minitoc.  Unfortunately being anignorant beginner in this field  I don't know how to "Install it " and make > it work from Latex. > > > >

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton wrote: > I found the "package" to do the job called Minitoc. Unfortunately being an > ignorant beginner in this field I don't know how to "Install it " and make > it work from Latex. > > Mark, installation of a Latex package is usually done, nowadays,

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Guenter Milde users.sf.net> writes: > > On 2013-10-06, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: > >>> Hi Developers > > >>> It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the > >>> the ability to

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 2013-10-06, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >> On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: >>> Hi Developers >>> It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the >>> the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. >>> Plus

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: > Hi Developers > > It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the > the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. > > Plus a more detailed contents page at the start of each Chapter. This is a LaTeX issue, first

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more detailed contents page at the start of each Chap

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more detailed contents page at the start of each Chapter. This is a LaTeX issue, first and forem

New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more detailed contents page at the start of each Chapter. Best Regards Mark Horton

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On 4 April 2013 07:11, Richard Heck wrote: > On 04/03/2013 04:41 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: >> >> >>> Alex Vergara Gil wrote: I don´t know if thi request can be made inside Qt (I think there should be some package for this in the nokia library!). >>> >>> Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> No i

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Nico Williams wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Nico Williams wrote: >>> textual user, I prefer everything as textual as possible. I'd even >>> like a search feature for menus/functions, and in gener

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Nico Williams wrote: >> textual user, I prefer everything as textual as possible. I'd even >> like a search feature for menus/functions, and in general I'd like >> > That's a good idea and easy to pull-off: P

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Nico Williams wrote: > textual user, I prefer everything as textual as possible. I'd even > like a search feature for menus/functions, and in general I'd like > That's a good idea and easy to pull-off: Put in a search box that will filter UI-elements given a keywor

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

Since we're piling on... I don't mind the sort of ribbon menu as they've evolved to be at MSFT, but I do prefer pull-down menus with *text* instead of icons. I'm a textual user, I prefer everything as textual as possible. I'd even like a search feature for menus/functions, and in general I'd lik

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

As someone who routinely uses LyX on different platforms between Mac OS X and Windows 7 I just wanted to say that I think the LyX interface is beautiful. It strikes a great balance of feeling native and attractive on all platforms in my opinion, and with the higher resolutions many displays have th

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

PLEASE DO NOT CONSIDER RIBBON MENUS-- they are (one of the many) reason(s) I switched from MS-WORD to Lyx in the first place! They hide what you are looking for! Ehud Kaplan On 04/07/2013 04:05 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Pers

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

> Personally, I hate ribbon menus from the bottom of my heart. This is also my personal oppinion. I have to use Office-2010 sometimes, and whenever I can I revert to LibreOffice mostly because of the awkward UI ms office has. Regards

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

> > Personally, I hate ribbon menus from the bottom of my heart. I find > > them quite difficult to use, it takes ages to find what you are > > looking for. Quite probably they are ok when you get used to them, > > but there is really no need for all to go the M$ way. > > This is also my judgeme

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

> I have a feature request if this is not already requested to you: > Ribbon Menus. > What are your opinions about this? Is this approach correct to you? Anti-ergonomic garbage. "Ribbon menus" are a cerebral flatulance emanating from some product manager's "brain" at MS. Sincerely, Wolfgang

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

- Original Message - From: "Jürgen Spitzmüller" To: Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 11:16 AM Subject: Re: feature request: ribbon menus Well, this is an open source project. So if there are no license issues, everybody who is motivated enough to implement and maintain suc

Curses front end to LyX: was feature request: ribbon menus

On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:10:48 +0200 Walter van Holst wrote: > Or a curses front-end to LyX. Wow. What would *that* look like? /* Litt can't help getting interested */ Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On 2013-04-05 16:49, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: As I said this is my personal opinion so I migth be wrong, but I haven´t received any useful opinion (besides M$ patent) of why not doing such a thing just a few user complaining they will affect some how what they feel is comfortable. Regarding the p

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

- Original Message - From: "Steve Litt" To: Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 7:38 PM Subject: Re: feature request: ribbon menus On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:31:07 +0200 (CEST) Csikos Bela wrote: Alex Vergara Gil írta: >Hello developers! > >I have a feature req

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

From: stefano franchi To: Csikos Bela Cc: "lyx-users@lists.lyx.org" Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 10:04:41 AM Subject: Re: feature request: ribbon menus On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Csikos Bela wrote: If ribbon menus is what Windows ha

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:31:07 +0200 (CEST) Csikos Bela wrote: > Alex Vergara Gil írta: > > >Hello developers! > > > >I have a feature request if this is not already > > >requested to you: Ribbon Menus.> > > I don't know what ribbon menus is, a

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Csikos Bela wrote: > If ribbon menus is what Windows has in their menus, that is only the first > few items are shown and then you have to click an arrow to make other > menu items visible, > That used to be what ribbon menus were all about, hence the name. They n

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

Alex Vergara Gil írta: >Hello developers! > >I have a feature request if this is not already > >requested to you: Ribbon Menus.> I don't know what ribbon menus is, and I may not be the only one. You should have explained it, attached an image, or given a link where

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:47:25 +0200 "Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org" sent this: >Juha Meriluoto wrote: >> Personally, I hate ribbon menus from the bottom of my heart. I find >> them quite difficult to use, it takes ages to find what you are >> looking for. Quite probably they are

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

Juha Meriluoto wrote: > Personally, I hate ribbon menus from the bottom of my heart. I find > them quite difficult to use, it takes ages to find what you are looking > for. Quite probably they are ok when you get used to them, but there is > really no need for all to go the M$ way. This is also

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On 3.4.2013 19:20, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > Hello developers! > > I have a feature request if this is not already requested to you: Ribbon > Menus. > > The actual look of lyx makes duplicate functions in text menus and icon > menus, besides there is a lot of space was

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On 04/03/2013 04:41 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Alex Vergara Gil wrote: I don´t know if thi request can be made inside Qt (I think there should be some package for this in the nokia library!). Pavel Sanda wrote: No it isn't. Mr Google suggest that "Qt team at one point stopped developing th

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:20:24 -0500 "Alex Vergara Gil" wrote: > Hello developers! > > I have a feature request if this is not already requested to you: > Ribbon Menus. > > The actual look of lyx makes duplicate functions in text menus and > icon menus, besides th

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

Alex Vergara Gil wrote: I don´t know if thi request can be made inside Qt (I think there should be some package for this in the nokia library!). Pavel Sanda wrote: No it isn't. Mr Google suggest that "Qt team at one point stopped developing the control due to Microsoft licensing." This sound

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > I don´t know if thi request can be made inside Qt (I think there should be > some package for this in the nokia library!). No it isn't. Mr Google suggest that "Qt team at one point stopped developing the control due to Microsoft licensing." This sounds funny given the fa

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

Opinions are cheap, so I guess I'll offer mine. Patents are one thing I know next to nothing about, so that may be a game stopper to begin with, as Richard pointed out. I may be in the minority here, but in general I think the ribbon toolbar is a useful improvement for Microsoft products (at least

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On 04/03/2013 12:20 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello developers! I have a feature request if this is not already requested to you: Ribbon Menus. If someone wanted to code these as an option, I'd have no objection, except for the fact that Microsoft appears to have patented this:

feature request: ribbon menus

Hello developers! I have a feature request if this is not already requested to you: Ribbon Menus. The actual look of lyx makes duplicate functions in text menus and icon menus, besides there is a lot of space wasted by allocating the icon menus. This has nothing to do with intrinsic code but

Re: lyx feature request: view preamble only

Richard Heck írta: >On 10/26/2011 02:37 PM, Csikos Bela wrote:> > Hello lyx users and developers:> >> > In lyx the total preamble is different from the preamble which can be edited> > in Document>Settings>LaTeX preamble as lyx adds its own code to the> > preamble.> >> > Occasionally it is good to

Re: lyx feature request: view preamble only

On 10/26/2011 02:37 PM, Csikos Bela wrote: > Hello lyx users and developers: > > In lyx the total preamble is different from the preamble which can be edited > in Document>Settings>LaTeX preamble as lyx adds its own code to the > preamble. > > Occasionally it is good to have a look at the full prea

lyx feature request: view preamble only

Hello lyx users and developers: In lyx the total preamble is different from the preamble which can be edited in Document>Settings>LaTeX preamble as lyx adds its own code to the preamble. Occasionally it is good to have a look at the full preamble including lyx inserted code. Currently the full pr

Re: Feature request

On 29. sep. 2011 00:22, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2011-09-28, ehud.kap...@gmail.com wrote: [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] Every time Latex is updated, Lyx must be reconfigured. Is there a way for Lyx to check whether Latex has been updated since the last time it was reconfigured, and

Re: Feature request

On 2011-09-28, ehud.kap...@gmail.com wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] > Every time Latex is updated, Lyx must be reconfigured. > Is there a way for Lyx to check whether Latex has been updated > since the last time it was reconfigured, and if so, to reconfigure itself? Just an id

Feature request

Every time Latex is updated, Lyx must be reconfigured. Is there a way for Lyx to check whether Latex has been updated since the last time it was reconfigured, and if so, to reconfigure itself? Thanks- Ehud Kaplan

Re: small feature request - center graphics

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:42 PM, James Sutherland wrote: > I would like to request that floating graphics and table environments be > centered by default.  They are currently left-justified.  This is > particularly awkward since the caption is centered. > Is this a setting that can be changed local

small feature request - center graphics

I would like to request that floating graphics and table environments be centered by default. They are currently left-justified. This is particularly awkward since the caption is centered. Is this a setting that can be changed locally? If not, can we have a "vote" on changing the default behavi

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 5/7/2011 1:30 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Neal Becker wrote: No File> Import> Gnumeric here (fedora 14 lyx-2.0.0-0.21.rc3.fc14.x86_64) What am I missing? Maybe Gnumeric. And perhaps LyX 2.0. Liviu After installing Gnumeric, path to its executable must be a

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > No File > Import > Gnumeric here (fedora 14 lyx-2.0.0-0.21.rc3.fc14.x86_64) > > What am I missing? > Maybe Gnumeric. And perhaps LyX 2.0. Liviu

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 6/05/2011 10:26 a.m., Julien Rioux wrote: On 05/05/2011 12:22 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 5/05/2011 12:32 p.m., Charlie wrote: If a vote is being taken on this feature request. I would rather that it doesn't happen, so please put me down as a "no". Please don't do i

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 05/05/2011 12:22 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 5/05/2011 12:32 p.m., Charlie wrote: If a vote is being taken on this feature request. I would rather that it doesn't happen, so please put me down as a "no". Please don't do it. There are plenty of spreadsheet program

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

Oh, I see, gnumeric will pull ODS or XLS in as well as its own. This is non-intuitive, but I haven't read the manual yet:-)-O el On 5/5/11 2:46 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: >> on 2.0 RC3 on 10.6.7 I can't see the OOo or Excell formats o

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: > on 2.0 RC3 on 10.6.7 I can't see the OOo or Excell formats offered unter > External Material. > > Please advise. > You should see the Gnumeric external material. It supports files saved under Gnumeric, OOo or Excel spreadsheet formats (y

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

Liviu, on 2.0 RC3 on 10.6.7 I can't see the OOo or Excell formats offered unter External Material. Please advise. greetings, el On 5/4/11 10:18 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: >> The current lack of even a basic 'active' table in LyX, where yo

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 5/05/2011 7:49 p.m., Liviu Andronic wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: LyX doesn't need to acquire spreadsheet capabilities. I have no wish to see it heading down the road of OpenOffice. But I am pretty sure that, when this support is implemented, there will be re

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 5/05/2011 7:39 p.m., Guenter Milde wrote: On 2011-05-05, Andrew Parsloe wrote: I think I have confused people, perhaps because I used the phrase 'LyX office suite' (but in quotes -- it was meant with a certain tongue-in-cheek quality) and mentioned the word spreadsheet. ... My request

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: >> LyX doesn't need to acquire spreadsheet capabilities. I have no wish to >> see it heading down the road of OpenOffice. > > But I am pretty sure that, when this support is implemented, there will > be requests that LyX displays the calculated

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 2011-05-05, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > I think I have confused people, perhaps because I used the phrase 'LyX > office suite' (but in quotes -- it was meant with a certain > tongue-in-cheek quality) and mentioned the word spreadsheet. ... > My request was for a button on the table toolbar that

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > I meant something more on these lines: you have a table in LyX with a few > columns of figures; you want the totals of the columns, perhaps a grand > total. The numbers aren't at this point fixed. New data may arise as you > work on your docu

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 5/05/2011 12:32 p.m., Charlie wrote: If a vote is being taken on this feature request. I would rather that it doesn't happen, so please put me down as a "no". Please don't do it. There are plenty of spreadsheet programs and if you haven't completed your work in

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On Wednesday 04 May 2011 20:32:03 Charlie wrote: > If a vote is being taken on this feature request. > > I would rather that it doesn't happen, so please put me down as a "no". > > Please don't do it. Context? What are we talking about? Do I really need

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

If a vote is being taken on this feature request. I would rather that it doesn't happen, so please put me down as a "no". Please don't do it. There are plenty of spreadsheet programs and if you haven't completed your work in the program you use, why would you place i

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > For a computer with limited memory (1 GB seemed big when I bought it), where > there's a lot of disk activity with multiple programs running, being able to > work in LyX alone would be helpful. > If computer resources are your biggest concer

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 04/05/2011 18:42, Pavel Sanda wrote: Andrew Parsloe wrote: Yes, but it would be nice to be able to sum a table in LyX without having to fire up Gnumeric or Excel or whatever. (To take matters to extremes, you this is the same as request that we should introduce some 'simple' graphics editor

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 05/04/2011 12:33 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote: On May 4, 2011, at 3:26 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 4/05/2011 9:59 p.m., Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: Yes, but it would be nice to be able to sum a table in LyX without having to fire up Gnumeric or

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On Wed, 4 May 2011, Pavel Sanda wrote: i think we should be good at editing text and typesetting. preparing the basic material like drawings, tables, computing numbers etc should do different apps which do it much better then we will ever do. we can create some reasonable binding to them, but th

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

Andrew Parsloe wrote: > Yes, but it would be nice to be able to sum a table in LyX without having > to fire up Gnumeric or Excel or whatever. (To take matters to extremes, you this is the same as request that we should introduce some 'simple' graphics editor for pictures. after simple editor is

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On May 4, 2011, at 3:26 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > On 4/05/2011 9:59 p.m., Liviu Andronic wrote: >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Parsloe >> wrote: >>> Yes, but it would be nice to be able to sum a table in LyX without having to >>> fire up Gnumeric or Excel or whatever. >>> >>

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 4/05/2011 9:59 p.m., Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: Yes, but it would be nice to be able to sum a table in LyX without having to fire up Gnumeric or Excel or whatever. It sure would. (To take matters to extremes, you could even fire up an

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > Yes, but it would be nice to be able to sum a table in LyX without having to > fire up Gnumeric or Excel or whatever. > It sure would. > (To take matters to extremes, you > could even fire up an external wordprocessor and create a pdf or l

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On 4/05/2011 9:18 p.m., Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: The current lack of even a basic 'active' table in LyX, where you can sum a column of figures for instance, This is not accurate. In 2.0 you can: File> Import> Table (CSV) File> Import> xl

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > The current lack of even a basic 'active' table in LyX, where you can sum a > column of figures for instance, > This is not accurate. In 2.0 you can: File > Import > Table (CSV) File > Import > xls File > Import > Gnumeric Insert > File > Ex

  1   2   3   >