Chris Carlen schrieb:
Hi:
I have Lyx 1.3.1 with Qt interface on Suse 8.1
I typed a multiline equation, then wanted to put a left brace delimiter
around it. I tried to select the whole thing, but when I inserted the
delimiter it replaced my equation instead of wrapping it on the left
side as
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:45:17AM -0700, Chris Carlen wrote:
> I have Lyx 1.3.1 with Qt interface on Suse 8.1
>
> I typed a multiline equation, then wanted to put a left brace delimiter
> around it. I tried to select the whole thing, but when I inserted the
> delimiter it repla
Hi:
I have Lyx 1.3.1 with Qt interface on Suse 8.1
I typed a multiline equation, then wanted to put a left brace delimiter
around it. I tried to select the whole thing, but when I inserted the
delimiter it replaced my equation instead of wrapping it on the left
side as I expected.
So I did
ome times one get frustrated when small things do not work
> (especially coming from the MS WORD side). The big things of course are
> the real reason for using LyX: Nice typesetting, automatic sorting of
> references, equation numbering, cross references etc.
>
See the links on
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:53:58PM +0900, Jorgen Johansson wrote:
Is there a way of automatically getting parenthesis around cross
referenced equation number? I.e. not typing the left and right
parenthesis around the cross reference.
Use a label beginning with eq: for the
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:53:58PM +0900, Jorgen Johansson wrote:
> Is there a way of automatically getting parenthesis around cross
> referenced equation number? I.e. not typing the left and right
> parenthesis around the cross reference.
Use a label beginning with eq: for the equa
Hello,
Is there a way of automatically getting parenthesis around cross
referenced equation number? I.e. not typing the left and right
parenthesis around the cross reference.
I am using lyx 1.3.0 under Cygwin.
Thanks for a great piece of software.
/jorgen
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:53:09PM +0200, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> As the subject says, how can I insert big parentheses into my
> multiline equation such that the left parenthesis is on line before the
> right parenthesis? Using the standard parenthesis instead of Alt-M ( works
> b
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:53:09PM +0200, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> As the subject says, how can I insert big parentheses into my
> multiline equation such that the left parenthesis is on line before the
> right parenthesis? Using the standard parenthesis instead of Alt-M ( works
> b
As the subject says, how can I insert big parentheses into my
multiline equation such that the left parenthesis is on line before the
right parenthesis? Using the standard parenthesis instead of Alt-M ( works
but gives too small parenthesis. I don't mind too much even if I have to
size th
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:04:47PM -0500, William O. Bray wrote:
> Okay, I should know the answer to this, in LaTex I do. Using Lyx, ams article
> style, with ams packages, what modification is needed to get the equation
> numbers on the right? I know that righttag is an option for t
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:04:47PM -0500, William O. Bray wrote:
> Okay, I should know the answer to this, in LaTex I do. Using Lyx, ams article
> style, with ams packages, what modification is needed to get the equation
> numbers on the right? I know that righttag is an option for t
Okay, I should know the answer to this, in LaTex I do. Using Lyx, ams article
style, with ams packages, what modification is needed to get the equation
numbers on the right? I know that righttag is an option for the amstex
package but it is not clear how to obtain this in Lyx.
best regards
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:37:47AM -0500, Frederic Leymarie wrote:
> could someone tell me how to make an equation
> take the full page width in a 2-column article document ?
Insert the equation into a wide figure float:
In LyX 1.2.x: Insert->Floats->Wide figure
In LyX 1.3.x: In
Hi
could someone tell me how to make an equation
take the full page width in a 2-column article document ?
Thank you,
Frederic
--
Frederic FOL LEYMARIE, Ph.D., Manager of the SHAPE Lab.
http://www.lems.brown.edu/shape/
Brown University, Division of Engineering, LEMS, Box D
182-4 Hope Street
> I would like the equation numbers to appear in brackets in the text
> when I reference them. How can this be done?
>
I use the Prettyref option and that puts in the parantheses around the
eqn. number when you reference an equation.. if you click on the
reference inset, in &quo
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Paul Medwell wrote:
| I would like the equation numbers to appear in brackets in the text when
| I reference them. How can this be done?
why you don't just put "(" reference-box ")" (remove quote).
like in multiple citation, e.g.
(\citeautho
Paul Medwell wrote:
> I would like the equation numbers to appear in brackets in the text when
> I reference them. How can this be done?
Try to redefine [EMAIL PROTECTED] macro from
$TEXMF/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx in the preamble of your document.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger: 89EF 4BC
I would like the equation numbers to appear in brackets in the text when
I reference them. How can this be done?
Cheers,
Paul
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:41:03AM -0600, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
> I'm having some difficulty getting equations numbered. Toggeling
> Edit->Math->Toggle numbering does not seem to do anything. I am using
> lyx 1.2.3. I have tried both the menue and alt-m n. Is this a known bug
> or am I missing so
ug
> or am I missing something here?
You can only number display equations, so you need to convert your formula
to a display equation either by the menu, or by pressing ctrl+shift+m.
I'm having some difficulty getting equations numbered. Toggeling
Edit->Math->Toggle numbering does not seem to do anything. I am using
lyx 1.2.3. I have tried both the menue and alt-m n. Is this a known bug
or am I missing something here?
--
Kirk R. Wythers Department of Forest Re
Myriam Abramson schrieb:
How do I remove an equation labeling?
Clearing the label does not seem to do the trick.
alt-m n
toggles numbering/labeling on/off
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
Hi!
How do I remove an equation labeling?
Clearing the label does not seem to do the trick.
Lyx 1.2.2
Thanks,
myriam
Myriam Abramson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Hi!
>
> Do you always have to number your equations or only when they are
> referred to in the text?
>
> For example, if I introduce an equation thusly:
>
&
Myriam Abramson schrieb:
Do you always have to number your equations or only when they are
referred to in the text?
in very short articles with only few equations it makes
sense without a numbering. But in long articles and books
or articles with a lot of euqations I always have them
numbered.
Hi!
Do you always have to number your equations or only when they are
referred to in the text?
For example, if I introduce an equation thusly:
The bang-bang force is applied to the right if
equation here in display mode
Do I need to number it?
Please help me
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 03:56:52PM +0100, Robert Neumann wrote:
> I have some pictures size about 5 x5 cm which I try to place in a text. Is
> there any way to place an array or a multiline equation besides the picture.
> With a table there is no chance and when I use Hfills, the p
Hello,
I have some pictures size about 5 x5 cm which I try to place in a text. Is
there any way to place an array or a multiline equation besides the picture.
With a table there is no chance and when I use Hfills, the problem is, that
the array ia not at the same height as the picture, the
M-m c i does the job fine.
many thanks
Morgan
On Tue 17 Dec 2002 12:23, you wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:06:38PM +, Morgan Kelly wrote:
> > What do I do?
>
> You could start with telling us the version of LyX you use.
>
> M-m c i for 'math column insert' might help in a few cases
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:06:38PM +, Morgan Kelly wrote:
> What do I do?
You could start with telling us the version of LyX you use.
M-m c i for 'math column insert' might help in a few cases.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do
Hi
how do I input equations into the AMS align, alignat etc environments?
reLyX can import these fine from latex files but when I go to use the align
environment, all I get are two blue boxes corresponding to a single equation.
I can replicate these in new rows by CTRL-ENTER but I clearly need
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:10:29AM -0600, Kent Kostuk wrote:
> Here is a link to a minimal example file. I get an error when I try to
> include the LaTeX preamble commands to change the equation numbering format.
>
> http://homepage.usask.ca/~kjk340/ch3_dekel_tsur.lyx
You haev a
>= Original Message From Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:45:52AM -0500, sucho2 wrote:
>> I am using for the document layout, AMS article. However, I'm getting left
>> aligned equation numbers. How do I get the right aligned equ
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:45:52AM -0500, sucho2 wrote:
> I am using for the document layout, AMS article. However, I'm getting left
> aligned equation numbers. How do I get the right aligned equation numbering?
Open the document dialog, and add 'reqno' to the 'Extra options' field.
Here is a link to a minimal example file. I get an error when I try to
include the LaTeX preamble commands to change the equation numbering format.
http://homepage.usask.ca/~kjk340/ch3_dekel_tsur.lyx
Kent Kostuk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:42:31AM -0600, Kent Kostuk wrote:
> When I try this in one of my chapters or my master file when I am trying
> to check the layout of my whole thesis I get an error.
I can't tell from this what is the error. Send a minimal example file.
> \usepackage{natbib}
> \usepack
[\theequation]}%
}
What this does is it places my equation numbers on the left margin and encloses them
with squared brackets.
When I try this in one of my chapters or my master file when I am trying to check the
layout of my whole thesis I get an error.
The LaTeX preamble in my master file has
Hello,
I am using for the document layout, AMS article. However, I'm getting left
aligned equation numbers. How do I get the right aligned equation numbering?
Also, anyone here publishing mathematical physics articles to iop? If you
are, are you able to incorporate the latex class
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 02:59:23PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> This is the way I am using. It is kind of 'real ERT' in math mode. Why
> cannot we use ERT in math mode?
The problem in this case is that \intertext switches from math mode to text
mode but the command is unknown to mathed and so it assum
Bo Peng schrieb:
As I have said in one of my previous emails, \intertext is supposed to
be used like the following:
\intertext {and because $\xi_{k}$ and $U_k$ are iid}
However, lyx puts text in \textrm and formula without $$ and generates
latex code:
\intertext {\textrm{and because }\xi _{
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:34:11PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> \intertext is for real textmode. If you want text and math, then use
> \text{...}
> inside your mathstuff
> Herbert
As I have said in one of my previous emails, \intertext is supposed to
be used like the following:
\intertext {an
Bo Peng schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:14:49PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
look at attached file. the only problem are the spaces. You still
have
to insert them as \ because you cant switch to textmode inside
intertext.
Herbert
This only solves part of the problem. I still
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:14:49PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> look at attached file. the only problem are the spaces. You still
> have
> to insert them as \ because you cant switch to textmode inside
> intertext.
> Herbert
This only solves part of the problem. I still can not enter any math
s
Bo Peng schrieb:
This is the way I am using. It is kind of 'real ERT' in math mode. Why
cannot we use ERT in math mode? Currently, TeX botton only insert a \ in
math mode.
look at attached file. the only problem are the spaces. You still have
to insert them as \ because you cant switch to te
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:44:01PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 02:07:00PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> > There is a serious problem (a bug?) with this solution: I can not enter
> > math in \intertext{}. Lyx treats text in \intertext as math but it
> > should be treated as text.
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 02:07:00PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> There is a serious problem (a bug?) with this solution: I can not enter
> math in \intertext{}. Lyx treats text in \intertext as math but it
> should be treated as text. For example,
>
> I enter
> \intertext{
> C-M to text mode
> and
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 08:31:21PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:15:10AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> You don't need to have a the ERT on a line of its own
> Write \intertext{ at the first cell of the first line after the text.
> See attached file.
There is a serious problem (a
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 08:31:21PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:15:10AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> You don't need to have a the ERT on a line of its own
> Write \intertext{ at the first cell of the first line after the text.
> See attached file.
> Using this has a limitation:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:15:10AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> Hi, Everyone,
>
> I checked the tip and trick page and lyx mathed manual, \intertext is
> not supported by lyx. However, is there a way to use ERT to do this? I
> could not let the ERT have its own line (without alignment). I am using
>
Bo Peng schrieb:
I checked the tip and trick page and lyx mathed manual, \intertext is
not supported by lyx. However, is there a way to use ERT to do this? I
could not let the ERT have its own line (without alignment). I am using
lyx-1.2.1.
the example from the manual written in ert:
\[
\beg
Hi, Everyone,
I checked the tip and trick page and lyx mathed manual, \intertext is
not supported by lyx. However, is there a way to use ERT to do this? I
could not let the ERT have its own line (without alignment). I am using
lyx-1.2.1.
BTW, link "multline environment" in "math-tips" page (
h
> Text can have a binary flag called 'special'. If you set this and
> choose'Combined Latex/EPS export', the text will be put in the LaTeX
> part...
>
Great. This is cool.. I just tried this out now but looks like there's
some problem with the combined export from xfig since I get this latex
err
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 06:14:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:11:00PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> > >
> > > xfig and pstricks or xfig and "special text" in xfig.
> > >
> >
> > By "special text" in xfig, do you mean the Ctrl^ and Ctrl_ ? Or is there
> > something
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:11:00PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> >
> > xfig and pstricks or xfig and "special text" in xfig.
> >
>
> By "special text" in xfig, do you mean the Ctrl^ and Ctrl_ ? Or is there
> something else in xfig that can do all the latex math?
Text can have a binary flag ca
>
> xfig and pstricks or xfig and "special text" in xfig.
>
By "special text" in xfig, do you mean the Ctrl^ and Ctrl_ ? Or is there
something else in xfig that can do all the latex math?
nirmal
Yann Collete schrieb:
> If you do a view ps inside lyx, you'll have a beautiful equation inside
> your figure.
an two-liner with pstricks:
\psellipse[linewidth=2pt](0,0)(2,1)
\rput(0,0){$\dfrac{x^2}{a}+\dfrac{y^2}{b}=1$}
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:03:05AM +0800, Hisyam Lee wrote:
>>
>>>What is the best way to draw an ellipse and write an lyx/latex equation
>>>
>>> x^2 y^2
>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:03:05AM +0800, Hisyam Lee wrote:
> > What is the best way to draw an ellipse and write an lyx/latex equation
> >
> > x^2 y^2
> > - + - = 1 beside the graphic?
>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:03:05AM +0800, Hisyam Lee wrote:
> What is the best way to draw an ellipse and write an lyx/latex equation
>
> x^2 y^2
> - + - = 1 beside the graphic?
> a^2 b^2
xfig and pstricks or xfig and "special text" in xfig.
Andre&
Hisyam Lee schrieb:
>
> What is the best way to draw an ellipse and write an lyx/latex equation
>
> x^2 y^2
> - + - = 1 beside the graphic?
> a^2 b^2
f.ex.:
in preamble
\usepackage{pst-col,pstricks}
\usepackage{amsmath}% or activate button in layout->d
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 04:03, Hisyam Lee wrote:
[...]
> What is the best way to draw an ellipse and write an lyx/latex
> equation
>
> x^2 y^2
> - + - = 1 beside the graphic?
> a^2 b^2
If its only a small formula you may add it directly into the
LyX-figur
Hi Folks,
What is the best way to draw an ellipse and write an lyx/latex equation
x^2 y^2
- + - = 1 beside the graphic?
a^2 b^2
Thank you very much.
H Lee
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:55:14AM +0200, Jan Smid wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got a question concerning biochemical equations in lyx 1.2.1:
>
> how can I do somthing like this:
>
> enzyme
> adp + p --> atp? I just found a doubledirection arrow <-->.
> (the formula is an example, it is pr
Hello,
I got a question concerning biochemical equations in lyx 1.2.1:
how can I do somthing like this:
enzyme
adp + p --> atp? I just found a doubledirection arrow <-->.
(the formula is an example, it is probably incorrect :-) )
TIA!
-j
at least two patches to fix this on the list,
> so it should be fixed somehow in 1.2.2
>
> > -Are spaces, dashes, underscores forbidden in equation labels?
>
> They are not really forbidden, but they tend to screw up "external
> helpers". LyX got that status lately as
should be fixed somehow in 1.2.2
> -Are spaces, dashes, underscores forbidden in equation labels?
They are not really forbidden, but they tend to screw up "external
helpers". LyX got that status lately as you noticed...
> and if so:
>-what can I use to separate my words?
se LyX). Untill yesterday, I used spaces,
underscores and dashes in my figure(floats), sections or equation
labels. Everything was working fine.
But yersterday, all the spaces present in my equation labels vanished,
thus breaking all the referencing of the thesis.
Besides, the equation labels that had
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:19:42PM +0200, Koen Vanbleu wrote:
> Just installed LyX1.2.1 and ran into troubles (a bug?) with equation
> labels containing underscores.
I understand that this is indeed a bug and I'll promise to have a look.
Note, however, that underscores in labels
Just installed LyX1.2.1 and ran into troubles (a bug?) with equation
labels containing underscores.
When inserting an equation and giving it a label like
"eq:interesting_equation", the next time you open the document
containing the equation, the label is changed to
"eq
Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
> When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as
> postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going
> until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx
> automatically wrap a long equa
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
> Hi,
> When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as
> postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going
> until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? s
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 10:10:01AM -0500, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
> I want to import an equation I created in LyX into staroffice. Trouble
> is (after exporting as ps, the equation prints as an entire page) I
> don't want to import an entire page 8.5 by 11, for a one line equation.
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
> When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as
> postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going
> until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug?
Yes.
> s
You need to put \sloppy in your preamble for Latex to wrap the long
equation.. It might affect spacing at other places too but I haven't had a
problem with this...
nirmal
At 08:05 AM 5/22/2002 -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
>Hi,
>When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and t
Hi,
When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as
postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going
until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx
automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?
Thanks.
Reu
>>Subject: cropping an equation for import
>>From: "Kirk R. Wythers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Date: 21 May 2002 10:10:01 -0500
>>
>>I want to import an equation I created in LyX into staroffice. Trouble
>>is (after
I want to import an equation I created in LyX into staroffice. Trouble
is (after exporting as ps, the equation prints as an entire page) I
don't want to import an entire page 8.5 by 11, for a one line equation.
Is there any way to crop the equation so that it can be imported as the
size
cross-referencing, and probably have a couple exceptions and
> turn
> > > off the numbering for that equation only.
> >
> > http://www.lyx.org/help/mathstuff/numbering.php3
>
> This won't allow disable the numbering for some equations.
>
> A different solution
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 07:29:56PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
>
> > Is there any way I can keep the equation numbering on automatically for the
> > whole document? I read through the user guide, but it seems that the only way
> > to have a
Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
> Is there any way I can keep the equation numbering on automatically for the
> whole document? I read through the user guide, but it seems that the only way
> to have a numbered equation is by either insert a label for that equation, or
> by typing ma
Is there any way I can keep the equation numbering on automatically for the
whole document? I read through the user guide, but it seems that the only way
to have a numbered equation is by either insert a label for that equation, or
by typing math-number in the mini buffer.
What I'd li
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:08:19AM -0700, Sachin V. Shah wrote:
> I belive I was finally able to figure out what the problem was. When
> trying to make a labelled equation, I would bring up a math box (C-m in
> CUA mode, English version), intentionally move it to the next line and
>
Hello,
I belive I was finally able to figure out what the problem was. When
trying to make a labelled equation, I would bring up a math box (C-m in
CUA mode, English version), intentionally move it to the next line and
then go to the paragraph layout window and center it manually.
Approximately
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:59:03PM -0700, Sachin V. Shah wrote:
> One thing I did notice (just as I was typing this email) is that if I open
> up the User Guide (Help->User's Guide) and try to add a number/label to an
> equation in there, it works. This is extremely puzzling,
rl-M),
only for display equations (Alt-m d on my German LyX).
> My exact steps were:
>
> 1) Be in math editing mode.
>
> 2) Click on the bottom bar and type in "math-number".
>
> 3) All I get is the message "(math-number: [M-m n])" in the status bar,
>
the bottom bar and type in "math-number".
3) All I get is the message "(math-number: [M-m n])" in the status bar,
then nothing happens.
I also tried:
1) Be in math editing mode (I tried with the cursor in various parts of
the equation and with none of/some of/whole equati
Joeri Verbiest wrote:
> Can anybody help my with how I number my equations. I have read the page
> http://www.lyx.org/help/mathstuff/numbering.php3
> and follow some instruction, but I get no numbering. Can anybody tell
> step by step what I must do
> Thanks
>
this may help:
http://www.lyx.or
Hi,
Can anybody help my with how I number my equations. I have read the page
http://www.lyx.org/help/mathstuff/numbering.php3
and follow some instruction, but I get no numbering. Can anybody tell
step by step what I must do
Thanks
Joeri
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Matias Freytes wrote:
>
> > I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
> > write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
> > both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?
>
> as far as I k
Matias Freytes wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>
>>Matias Freytes wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
>>>write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
>>>b
Matias Freytes wrote:
> I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
> write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
> both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?
as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
Hello,
I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?
Thank you,
Matias.
Thanks!!
On Sunday 31 March 2002 14:45, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
> Le Dimanche 31 Mars 2002 21:15, vous avez écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a multiline equation. How can I cross-reference inside the
> > equation, such as:
> >
> > x=y+5 by equation 1.2
>
Le Dimanche 31 Mars 2002 21:15, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have a multiline equation. How can I cross-reference inside the
> equation, such as:
>
> x=y+5 by equation 1.2
> z=t+r
> ...
>
> I tried tusing a table, but then I couldn't have the display formula
&
Hi,
I have a multiline equation. How can I cross-reference inside the equation,
such as:
x=y+5 by equation 1.2
z=t+r
...
I tried tusing a table, but then I couldn't have the display formula feature
inside a table... Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Remzi
Torsten Hahn wrote:
> in section 5.4 in he lyx user guide (german) is a eq_array shown, where the
> 1. and 2. equation is numbered and the 3 is not. How can i do that ?
> Pressing "alt m n" like described there turns only all numbers on or of. What
> is the trick ?
h
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:50:31AM +0100, Torsten Hahn wrote:
> in section 5.4 in he lyx user guide (german) is a eq_array shown, where the
> 1. and 2. equation is numbered and the 3 is not. How can i do that ?
> Pressing "alt m n" like described there turns only all numbers o
Hi,
in section 5.4 in he lyx user guide (german) is a eq_array shown, where the
1. and 2. equation is numbered and the 3 is not. How can i do that ?
Pressing "alt m n" like described there turns only all numbers on or of. What
is the trick ?
CU,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Hahn
TU Be
; C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r), & w_r' < \alpha_r(\vec{w})
> \vee w_r' > \beta_r(\vec{w})
> \end{cases}
> \]
>
> What is the best way to label it?
It was a silly question, sorry! I only need to substitute "\[" "\]"
wit
501 - 600 of 725 matches
Mail list logo
