On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400
rgheck wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > The method proposed by Siegfried works if (and only if) you do not
> > use a new feature of LyX 1.6 and if you do not use a feature whose
> > semantics was changed (which is the case for many features).
> >
> >
>
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
The method proposed by Siegfried works if (and only if) you do not use a
new feature of LyX 1.6 and if you do not use a feature whose semantics was
changed (which is the case for many features).
Let me just clarify what Jurgen means by this by giving an example. In
ossible cause for
bug http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5822. (I mean the different
OS'es and lyx2lyx).
Vincent
M-L wrote:
> I created some files on LyX 1.6.1 in windows XP and then went to:
>
> File - then to Export - then to LyX 1.5.x
>
> With each of them.
>
> Then emailed them as an attachment and later picked it up on my Linux
> Debian Lenny machine and tried to open it with LyX 1.5.5
>
> It wouldn't op
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:21:45 +0100
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> M-L wrote:
> > I recall that I once had to change many documents from LyX 1.6.1 and
> > deleted the first 6 or so lines at the top of the documents and
> > replaced them with 6 or so lines of the older version. I didn't
> > realise it
M-L wrote:
> I recall that I once had to change many documents from LyX 1.6.1 and
> deleted the first 6 or so lines at the top of the documents and replaced
> them with 6 or so lines of the older version. I didn't realise it was this
> simple. Anything that works is a nice workaround.
Note that th
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Siegfried Meunier-Guttin-Cluzel engaged keyboard and
shared this with us all:
>--} Since I often have this problem, I've found a workaround ( not a nice
>--} one, but it works when the formats aren't too different).
>--} I simply change the number of the LyX format.
>--} Open y
Since I often have this problem, I've found a workaround ( not a nice
one, but it works when the formats aren't too different).
I simply change the number of the LyX format.
Open your file with a text editor and see the second line e. g.
\lyxformat 276
Change this number to match the number used
M-L wrote:
> I've tried that but it doesn't work, or it doesn't work from LyX 1.6.1
> windows converting to LyX 1.5.x to be read by LyX 1.5.5 debian Lenny.
What exactly doesn't work?
Jürgen
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:35:40 +0100
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> > Is there a way to tell lyx 1.6.1 to save in an older lyx format?
>
> File>Export>LyX 1.5.x
>
> Jürgen
I've tried that but it doesn't work, or it doesn't work from LyX 1.6.1
windows converting to LyX
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> Is there a way to tell lyx 1.6.1 to save in an older lyx format?
File>Export>LyX 1.5.x
Jürgen
ried to open the document I was informed that it had
> been created by a different version of lyx. And that the lyx2lyx script
> had failed.
> I'm reasonably certain I hadn't used any new advanced features from
> ver 1.6.1 that ver 1.5.6 doesn't have.
...
> So I was a
to modify one of the .lyx files
on a different linux box. But the available version of lyx was only
1.5.6 and when I tried to open the document I was informed that it had
been created by a different version of lyx. And that the lyx2lyx script
had failed.
I'm reasonably certain I hadn'
Joachim Osnabryg wrote:
Question: What would be a correct command to "run lyx2lyx from the
terminal"
(for future problems)?
cd /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/
./lyx2lyx
Konrad Hofbauer schrieb weiter:
2) re-select Apple's built-in python as defau
Konrad Hofbauer schrieb:
But probably an incomplete python25 installed by macports, i.e., you are
missing some modules (the py25- stuff in macports).
You can either
1) run lyx2lyx from terminal, try to find out which modules it is
missing and install those from macports or
I tried that
.2.1_0+darwin_8 (active)
So, not python3.
But probably an incomplete python25 installed by macports, i.e., you are
missing some modules (the py25- stuff in macports).
You can either
1) run lyx2lyx from terminal, try to find out which modules it is
missing and install those from macports o
So, not python3.
But probably an incomplete python25 installed by macports, i.e., you are
missing some modules (the py25- stuff in macports).
You can either
1) run lyx2lyx from terminal, try to find out which modules it is
missing and install those from macports or
2) re-select A
Konrad Hofbauer schrieb:
Have you changed something in your python installation
(e.g., installed python3)?
Months ago, I installed MacPorts, because I wanted to use
rtf2latex2e (with LaTeX and LyX).
I did some other install and uninstall with MacPorts meanwhile,
the uninstalls I did careful
Joachim Osnabryg wrote:
Yesterday, I still produced lyx letters with my own templates. Today -
whyever - I wanted to start with File => New and got the error message:
/LyX-1.6/templates/defaults.lyx
is from another LyX-Version, but the lyx2lyx script could not convert
the document.
H
ion, aber das lyx2lyx-Skript
konnte das
Dokument nicht konvertieren.
=
.../LyX-1.6/templates/defaults.lyx
is from another LyX-Version, but the lyx2lyx script could not
convert the document.
This is rather cryptic for me. I neit
Samuel Russell wrote:
ImportError: No module named zlib
I had the same problem with a macports-installed python 2.5.
The problem is that the basic macports-python packeage misses a lot of
things. In this particular case, you also need to install py25-zlib from
macports.
HTH,
Konrad
Dear lyx users,
with OS X 10.4.11 + Texlive2008 (MacTex) + LyX 1.6.1 opening lyx
files from 1.5 I got lyx2lyx failures, and invoking lyx2lyx at the
command line results in:
/Applications/TeX/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx "being
classylyx.lyx"
Traceback (most r
Marcus Glöder schrieb:
Hello and a nice day,
Hello,
now I have solved my problem. I had installed LyX 1.6.1 by
LyX-161-4-16-AltInstaller-Small.exe
After I deleted LyX 1.6.1 and reinstalled it with the installation file
LyX-1.6.1-1-Installer.exe,
it works. Both installation files you can do
: Das Konvertierungsscript ist fehlgeschlagen
C:\Dokumente\lyx\dateiname.lyx stammt von einer anderen LyX-Version,
aber das lyx2lyx-Script konnte das Dokument nicht konvertieren.
--- \end{quote} ---
(In English approximately:
LyX: The conversion script failed
C:\documents\lyx\filename.lyx comes from anothe
The LyX terminal output:
D:\Programme\LyX 1.5.7\bin>lyx
Menu warning: menu entries "Spalte anfügen|S" and "Swap Rows|S" share the
same
shortcut.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "D:/Programme/LyX 1.5.7/Resources/./lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx", line 83, in
main
mrg wrote:
> I have changed to the new LyX-157-3-27-AltInstaller-Small but the
> lyx2lyx-Script-Error still exists.
Did you try to start LyX from a terminal and check its output?
Jürgen
I have changed to the new LyX-157-3-27-AltInstaller-Small but the
lyx2lyx-Script-Error still exists.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/LyX-1.5.7-and-lyx2lyx-Script-tp1612843p1618572.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 06:20:40PM -0500, Michael Wojcik wrote:
> This has gone on far too long, and I'm not really interested in
> arguing the point.
When I am not really interested in arguing a point anymore, I just
stop doing it. I don't consider that a bad habit.
> [...]
> So, for the record:
This has gone on far too long, and I'm not really interested in
arguing the point. But some of your response is simply factually
incorrect. So, for the record:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:21:27AM -0500, Michael Wojcik wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at
mrg wrote:
> After I changed to the new LyX 1.5.7 (LyX-157-3-26-AltInstaller-Small.exe)
> I receive a lyx2lyx-Script-Error if I open the MiKTeX 2.7 beamer examples
> like beamerexample-lyx.lyx, conference-ornate-20min.en.lyx ...
There's an updated version (LyX-157-3-27-AltInstaller
After I changed to the new LyX 1.5.7 (LyX-157-3-26-AltInstaller-Small.exe) I
receive a lyx2lyx-Script-Error if I open the MiKTeX 2.7 beamer examples like
beamerexample-lyx.lyx, conference-ornate-20min.en.lyx ...
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/LyX-1.5.7-and-lyx2lyx-Script
> > - The 4.3 BSD kernel. Extended multihead support in the console driver
> > and wrote some drivers for new hardware. Enhanced the shared memory
> > kernel option. Nothing that didn't want to use the new features needed
> > to be recompiled.
>
> Spring (?) 2001 - January 2002.
Sorry to jump int
On 23/11/2008 16:26, Michael Wojcik wrote:
In older versions of the Microsoft toolchain, you could just drop the
MSVC DLLs into the same directory as your executable. That's no longer
allowed (I think as of Visual Studio 2005 and Platform SDK 6.0). Now
they have to be installed into the SxS tree.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:21:27AM -0500, Michael Wojcik wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 03:42:52PM -0500, Michael Wojcik wrote:
> >> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> >> I've worked on many projects that maintained
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:26:30AM -0500, Michael Wojcik wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Completely infeasible on Windows. The loss of shared text would make
> >> the working set of the typical application mix grossly exceed even the
> >> absurd amounts of RAM available in typical machine
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 03:47:45PM -0500, Michael Wojcik wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> What's wrong with static linking? At least it goes away when the
>>> application goes away.
>> Completely infeasible on Windows. ...
>> Many people have done
>> back-of-the-enve
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 03:42:52PM -0500, Michael Wojcik wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
>> I've worked on many projects that maintained backward compatibility
>> with new releases of the API, and seen a great
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Completely infeasible on Windows. The loss of shared text would make
>> the working set of the typical application mix grossly exceed even the
>> absurd amounts of RAM available in typical machines today. The disk
>> space problem would be even worse.
>
> I meant jus
Andre Poenitz wrote:
PPS: I cut a few smileys from the mail to avoid the embarassing ranking
in the 1.7 smiley-per-mail statistics.
Best to start now, eh?
rh
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:43:34PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > PPS: I cut a few smileys from the mail to avoid the embarassing ranking
> > > in the 1.7 smiley-per-mail statistics.
> >
> > feel free to uncover yourself, users list is not evaluated...
>
> Nobody expected the Spanish Inquisiti
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:43:34PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > PPS: I cut a few smileys from the mail to avoid the embarassing ranking
> > in the 1.7 smiley-per-mail statistics.
>
> feel free to uncover yourself, users list is not evaluated...
Nobody expected the Spanish Inquisition...
Andre'
> PPS: I cut a few smileys from the mail to avoid the embarassing ranking
> in the 1.7 smiley-per-mail statistics.
feel free to uncover yourself, users list is not evaluated...
pavel
Completely infeasible on Windows. The loss of shared text would make
the working set of the typical application mix grossly exceed even the
absurd amounts of RAM available in typical machines today. The disk
space problem would be even worse.
I meant just for application which feel that they hav
PPS: I cut a few smileys from the mail to avoid the embarassing
ranking
in the 1.7 smiley-per-mail statistics.
Chicken! Does not even dare to be rude anymore.
JMarc
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 03:47:45PM -0500, Michael Wojcik wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> > What's wrong with static linking? At least it goes away when the
> > application goes away.
>
> Completely infeasible on Windows. The loss of shared text would make
> the working set of the typic
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 03:42:52PM -0500, Michael Wojcik wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> >> I wonder if disk manufacturers are paying M$ to do this? I've got about
> >> 54MB of crap in %windir%\winsxs, with multiple versions of e
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> What's wrong with static linking? At least it goes away when the
> application goes away.
Completely infeasible on Windows. The loss of shared text would make
the working set of the typical application mix grossly exceed even the
absurd amounts of RAM available in
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
>> I wonder if disk manufacturers are paying M$ to do this? I've got about
>> 54MB of crap in %windir%\winsxs, with multiple versions of each set of
>> files. Presumably there's no way for Windoze to know th
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 09:58:50PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In fact that's actually the most sensible behaviour since there are only
> > very few cases where a new version indeed can replace an older one
> > without any existing or imagined
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In fact that's actually the most sensible behaviour since there are only
> very few cases where a new version indeed can replace an older one
> without any existing or imagined problem.
What's wrong with static linking? At least it goes away when the
ap
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> I wonder if disk manufacturers are paying M$ to do this? I've got about
> 54MB of crap in %windir%\winsxs, with multiple versions of each set of
> files. Presumably there's no way for Windoze to know that something
> depending
Michael Wojcik wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
there
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
>
>> On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
>> failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
>> suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I thi
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
there is a problem with the python.exe and/or pyt
ave Python 2.5.1 installed but the installer didn't
> recognize it.
No, I think I was not clear enough. The second sentenc you cited above
bear on my insallation on a WinXP system, where your installer worked
perfectly.
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx scr
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
>> Should I try to install Python on Vista and try to convert
>> from LyX 1.5 to 1.6 again?
> That would likely work. Alternatively, you might install the M$ VC++
> redistributable package
> (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyi
I wrote:
p.s. I'll provide a new installer version within the next 2 hours that
fixes some Vista-specific bugs.
You can now download this version from:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=15417
That fixes the following bugs:
- fix a bug in the Romanian
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
In the bin directory is a python26.dll file.
Oh -- I just saw that I have a full Python installed on the WinXP
machine (I didn't realize that, sorry...). It's Python 2.5.1
This means that you have Python 2.5.1 installed but the installer didn't
recognize it.
I'm c
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Also, you might check try converting a file manually on the Vista box,
using a DOS shell. This would look something like
"C:\Program Files\LyX16\python\python.exe" "C:\Program
Files\LyX16\Resources\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx" doc.lyx
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Also, you might check try converting a file manually on the Vista box,
> using a DOS shell. This would look something like
>> "C:\Program Files\LyX16\python\python.exe" "C:\Program
>> Files\LyX16\Resources\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx" doc.lyx
&g
.x files.
>> I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
> Opening a 1.5.x doc requires that lyx2lyx, a Python script, be run. Do
> you have the same installation of Python on both boxes (just the subset
> that Uwe bundles, or a full install on both)?
I have only the Python that Uwe bundles
I have the same problem in Windows Vista with the Uwe's AltInstaller.
Sergio
Dominik Waßenhoven escribió:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
rea
uires that lyx2lyx, a Python script, be run. Do
you have the same installation of Python on both boxes (just the subset
that Uwe bundles, or a full install on both)? Also, you might check try
converting a file manually on the Vista box, using a DOS shell. This
would look something like
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
> I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
> of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
> read 1.5.x files.
I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
Regards,
Dominik.-
Hi all,
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I attach a file example which could not be opened on Vista, but could on
WinXP:
8<-
On Saturday 19 April 2008 11:36:19 Carlos Sosa Paz wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I wrote my lyx file in 1.4.2 lyx version but when i try to open it in 1.4.3
> version i got the following error message lyx2lyx failed to convert. Find
> attach the file.
Correction, your lyx files says that
Carlos Sosa Paz wrote:
> I wrote my lyx file in 1.4.2 lyx version but when i try to open it in 1.4.3
> version i got the following error message lyx2lyx failed to convert. Find
> attach the file.
LyX 1.4.3 is very old.
Anyway, the file opens fine in LyX 1.5.4.
Jürgen
Dear all
I wrote my lyx file in 1.4.2 lyx version but when i try to open it in 1.4.3
version i got the following error message lyx2lyx failed to convert.
Find attach the file.
Thanks
Carlos Sosa Paz
setofcost.lyx
Description: setofcost.lyx
On Monday 07 April 2008 16:39:25 José Matos wrote:
> This problem happens both for lyx 1.5.5svn and 1.6.0svn.
>
> > best,
> > rené toth
In order not to forget this bug I filled this in bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4719
--
José Abílio
On Monday 07 April 2008 15:21:07 René Toth wrote:
> hello,
>
> it seems that i've got a problem with lyx2lyx, when i try to import .tex
> documents which i've created with openoffice.
> lyx always reports an error to me, that the conversion-script failed,
> because the
hello,
it seems that i've got a problem with lyx2lyx, when i try to import .tex
documents which i've created with openoffice.
lyx always reports an error to me, that the conversion-script failed,
because the created .lyx file comes from a different
lyx-version and the lyx2lyx scrip
our advice, then LyX read it perfectly, no lyx2lyx
> > failure.
> >
> > I have other LyX files on the removable disk (created with 1.5.3 on
> > Ubuntu) which open with no problems. I don't quite follow the details
> > of what is happening, but if I copy the
G. Jay Kerns wrote:
Thanks! As it turns out, when I copied the file from my removable
SanDisk to follow your advice, then LyX read it perfectly, no lyx2lyx
failure.
I have other LyX files on the removable disk (created with 1.5.3 on
Ubuntu) which open with no problems. I don't quite f
G. Jay Kerns wrote:
Dear Paul,
Thanks! As it turns out, when I copied the file from my removable
SanDisk to follow your advice, then LyX read it perfectly, no lyx2lyx
failure.
I have other LyX files on the removable disk (created with 1.5.3 on
Ubuntu) which open with no problems. I don&#
Dear Paul,
Thanks! As it turns out, when I copied the file from my removable
SanDisk to follow your advice, then LyX read it perfectly, no lyx2lyx
failure.
I have other LyX files on the removable disk (created with 1.5.3 on
Ubuntu) which open with no problems. I don't quite follow the de
rsion of LyX, but
lyx2lyx failed to convert the file." I found an earlier post from
December that suggested changing
\language default
to
\language english
but this doesn't work for me because my file already has \language
english. I checked the top of my file and it says
#LyX 1.
Dear LyX users,
I am in the process of graduating from Windows to Linux. I installed
LyX 1.5.3 on an Ubuntu Gutsy using the Synaptic Package Manager.
Now it seems that I cannot open any of my old LyX files (<= 1.5.2).
It says that "(Myfile) came from an earlier version of LyX, but
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:02:43 rgheck wrote:
> If the file is from 1.5, upgrade to 1.4.5.1: It can read files from 1.5.
> If the problem is file corruption, we can try to solve the problem if
> you post the file here.
Sometimes that is not possible due to privacy reasons, in some cases you c
Myriam Abramson wrote:
Hello,
I have 1.4.3. I get a message that lyx2lyx cannot convert from an
earlier version of lyx. What should i do?
There are two possibilities: The file is actually from an older version
of LyX (1.5), or the file is corrupt. To find out, open the file in a
text
Hello,
I have 1.4.3. I get a message that lyx2lyx cannot convert from an
earlier version of lyx. What should i do?
TIA
--
myriam
Jim Burton schrieb:
I'm unable to open a file created in a 1.5.x version of Lyx in my older
one (1.4.3).
You need to export your file in LyX 1.5.x as LyX-file in the format of LyX 1.4.x. The resulting file
gets then the file extension ".lyx14" and this can you can open with LyX 1.4.x.
regar
I'm unable to open a file created in a 1.5.x version of Lyx in my older
one (1.4.3). The error message is that the file is from an older version
of Lyx and lyx2lyx failed to convert it, but I understand that's a bug
in the message. This is the same problem as seen on the list he
On Dec 8, 2007, at 4:06 AM, José Matos wrote:
On Friday 07 December 2007 19:47:25 Christopher Menzel wrote:
Howdy,
I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format
version 215)
A fix to this problem was committed to the next version (1.5.3).
Excellent.
Meanwhile a simp
>(MyFile) is from a different version of LyX, but the lyx2lyx script
> failed to convert it.
>
> When I try to run lyx2lyx from the command line I get the following
> debug info:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "./lyx2lyx", line 101, in
>
Howdy,
I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format
version 215) and I'm not finding any solutions on the web or the LyX
archives or Wiki. Inside LyX, I get the following msg:
(MyFile) is from a different version of LyX, but the lyx2lyx script
failed to co
Marcelo Acuña
Wed, 30 May 2007 14:03:06 -0700
> Then, can you manually convert your file? I mean,
> under a command prompt, run
>
> python -tt
> /usr/local/share/lyx-1.5.0b3/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
> yourfile.lyx > newfile.lyx
>
> Bo
With this command I can run lyx2l
> > What is RC2, RC1?
>
> Lyx 1.5.0 is now at beta3 testing stage. The next
> testing release will
> be called release candidate 1 (RC1), which is
> planned to be released
> soon (this weekend?). There will likely to be a RC2
> release before
> 1.5.0 is officially released.
>
> Cheers,
> Bo
>
What is RC2, RC1?
Lyx 1.5.0 is now at beta3 testing stage. The next testing release will
be called release candidate 1 (RC1), which is planned to be released
soon (this weekend?). There will likely to be a RC2 release before
1.5.0 is officially released.
Cheers,
Bo
> > With this command I can run lyx2lyx but I get
> several
> > errors and I can´t get a file correctly exported.
> > I get this message:
> >
> > UnicodeEncodeError: "latin-1" codec can´t encode
> > character u"\u0301" in position 0: or
With this command I can run lyx2lyx but I get several
errors and I can´t get a file correctly exported.
I get this message:
UnicodeEncodeError: "latin-1" codec can´t encode
character u"\u0301" in position 0: ordinal not in
range(256)
I also see this with a few other file
> Then, can you manually convert your file? I mean,
> under a command prompt, run
>
> python -tt
> /usr/local/share/lyx-1.5.0b3/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
> yourfile.lyx > newfile.lyx
>
> Bo
With this command I can run lyx2lyx but I get several
errors and I can´t get a
> > I am sure that is
> > python -tt "usr/local/share/lyx-1.5.0b3/lyx2lyx/l
> >
> > without " at the end, but may be 1 o l the final
>
> Then, can you manually convert your file? I mean,
> under a command prompt, run
>
> python -tt
>
I am sure that is
python -tt "usr/local/share/lyx-1.5.0b3/lyx2lyx/l
without " at the end, but may be 1 o l the final
Then, can you manually convert your file? I mean, under a command prompt, run
python -tt /usr/local/share/lyx-1.5.0b3/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
yourfile.lyx > newfile.lyx
Bo
> > opensuse 10.2, kde 3.5, the file is big file
> (300.000
> > words) in koma script style
> > Marcelo
>
> There are some known problems with back conversion,
> but your problem
> seems to be with how lyx2lyx is called. Are you sure
> the error message
>
opensuse 10.2, kde 3.5, the file is big file (300.000
words) in koma script style
Marcelo
There are some known problems with back conversion, but your problem
seems to be with how lyx2lyx is called. Are you sure the error message
is
python -tt "usr/local/share/lyx-1.5.0b3/lyx2lyx/l&
> > Hello,
> > I want to export an example in beta 3 format to
> 1.4.x
> > or 1.3.x format. When I make an export I get an
> error:
> >
> > An eror ocurred whiist running phthon -tt
> > "usr/local/share/lyx-1.5.0b3/lyx2lyx/l
> >
>
On 5/30/07, Marcelo Acuña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I want to export an example in beta 3 format to 1.4.x
or 1.3.x format. When I make an export I get an error:
An eror ocurred whiist running phthon -tt
"usr/local/share/lyx-1.5.0b3/lyx2lyx/l
Is this a know bug?
No.
Ple
Hello,
I want to export an example in beta 3 format to 1.4.x
or 1.3.x format. When I make an export I get an error:
An eror ocurred whiist running phthon -tt
"usr/local/share/lyx-1.5.0b3/lyx2lyx/l
Is this a know bug?
Ma
ed by an earlier version,
> lyx2lyx failed to import ...)
run lyx from a terminal window and show us the error message printed by
lyx2lyx. Otherwise we cannot help.
Georg
-files (the error message
was something like: your file was generated by an earlier version,
lyx2lyx failed to import ...)
does anyone know how i could either get the new version up and running
or how i could back my beloved pdflatex abilities in the old version?
thanks in advance,
jan
--
Dr
101 - 200 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
