Julio, David:
I do not have the ubuntu-provided install of texlive. However, I do
have 2 working texlive installs: the 2010 texlive and the 2011
texlive. I need to keep the older one around for a while until a book
I wrote with it is actually printed.
I have no problems from the command line. I
that caches the results?
There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
Otherwise, I'm curious how can you tell that LyX is using the wrong texlive?
Cheers,
Stefano
--
Julien
,
perhaps there is a config somewhere file that caches the results?
There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
Otherwise, I'm curious how can you tell that LyX is using the wrong texlive?
Cheers,
Stefano
--
Julien
On 15/09/2011 7:27 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
I see that now, thanks for the info. But what am I suppose to write
there? The dialog calls it a PATH prefix. I tried adding
/usr/share/texlive/2011/ but it has no effect on my
the PATH variable to search for executables? If so,
perhaps there is a config somewhere file that caches the results?
There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
Otherwise, I'm curious how can you tell that LyX is using the wrong texlive?
Cheers,
Stefano
--
Julien
there.
Is LyX using the PATH variable to search for executables? If so,
perhaps there is a config somewhere file that caches the results?
There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
Otherwise, I'm curious how can you tell that LyX is using the wrong
texlive?
Cheers
In LyX, could Tools Preferences Paths PATH prefix be pointing to the old
version?
Paul
Problem solved :-)
Thanks to everyone, and particularly to Julio for pointing me in the
right direction. As he guessed, the problem was not with Lyx, but with
the environment that Kde works with. I always launch my applications
from Krunner (the little Kde app that offer a command line-like
to use a newly
installed Texlive system?
My user case:
a. I used to have Texlive 2010 installed. I upgraded to TexLive 2011
(better late than never...). I set up paths, etcetera
post-installation. (I did NOT erase my old Texlive 2010 installation,
because I still need it for older projects.) Now
have a generic answer but can write that I've had no problems
upgrading TeXLive. I run Slackware and there's a SlackBuild script that
correctly compiles everthing. Of course, one compressed source file is 1.2G
in size so it takes a while to download, and the build also takes a long
time, a lot
he
>> correct place if I am wrong. Or enlighten me and I'll a dd a wiki page if
>> none exists).
>
> Stefano,
>
> I don't have a generic answer but can write that I've had no problems
> upgrading TeXLive. I run Slackware and there's a SlackBuild script that
> correctl
st
>>> and the wiki did not produce any result. (please redirect me to the
>>> correct place if I am wrong. Or enlighten me and I'll a dd a wiki page if
>>> none exists).
>>
>> Stefano,
>>
>> I don't have a generic answer but can write that
Julio, David:
I do not have the ubuntu-provided install of texlive. However, I do
have 2 working texlive installs: the 2010 texlive and the 2011
texlive. I need to keep the older one around for a while until a book
I wrote with it is actually printed.
I have no problems from the command line. I
that caches the results?
There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
Otherwise, I'm curious how can you tell that LyX is using the wrong texlive?
Cheers,
Stefano
--
Julien
LyX using the PATH variable to search for executables? If so,
>> perhaps there is a config somewhere file that caches the results?
>>
>
> There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
>
> Otherwise, I'm curious how can you tell that LyX is using th
On 15/09/2011 7:27 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
I see that now, thanks for the info. But what am I suppose to write
there? The dialog calls it a "PATH prefix." I tried adding
"/usr/share/texlive/2011/" but it
LyX using the PATH variable to search for executables? If so,
perhaps there is a config somewhere file that caches the results?
There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
Otherwise, I'm curious how can you tell that LyX is using the wrong texlive?
Cheers,
Stefano
re.
>>>> Is LyX using the PATH variable to search for executables? If so,
>>>> perhaps there is a config somewhere file that caches the results?
>>>>
>>>
>>> There's a PATH setting in LyX' Preferences, you could check that.
>>>
>>> O
In LyX, could Tools > Preferences > Paths > PATH prefix be pointing to the old
version?
Paul
Problem solved :-)
Thanks to everyone, and particularly to Julio for pointing me in the
right direction. As he guessed, the problem was not with Lyx, but with
the environment that Kde works with. I always launch my applications
from Krunner (the little Kde app that offer a command line-like
Hi
I am under ubuntu and have texlive installed via apt-get but also manually
installed texlive2011 in $HOME/texlive.
I adjusted the paths and the binaries are found from LyX, but I can't
convince LyX to find the LaTeX classes and styles in the installation of
texlive2011. How can I tell LyX
OK - found it.
Had to run
mktexlsr
and it is working.
If I just could understand what these commands (texhash, mktexlsr, ..) are
doing, then I would no why...
Cheers,
Rainer
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am under ubuntu and have texlive
Rainer M Krug r.m.krug at gmail.com writes:
If I just could understand what these commands (texhash, mktexlsr, ..) are
doing, then I would no why...
I'm no TeXpert, but TeX maintains a database of package locations, which it uses
when searching for a particular package. The texhash and
Hi
I am under ubuntu and have texlive installed via apt-get but also manually
installed texlive2011 in $HOME/texlive.
I adjusted the paths and the binaries are found from LyX, but I can't
convince LyX to find the LaTeX classes and styles in the installation of
texlive2011. How can I tell LyX
OK - found it.
Had to run
mktexlsr
and it is working.
If I just could understand what these commands (texhash, mktexlsr, ..) are
doing, then I would no why...
Cheers,
Rainer
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am under ubuntu and have texlive
Rainer M Krug r.m.krug at gmail.com writes:
If I just could understand what these commands (texhash, mktexlsr, ..) are
doing, then I would no why...
I'm no TeXpert, but TeX maintains a database of package locations, which it uses
when searching for a particular package. The texhash and
Hi
I am under ubuntu and have texlive installed via apt-get but also manually
installed texlive2011 in $HOME/texlive.
I adjusted the paths and the binaries are found from LyX, but I can't
convince LyX to find the LaTeX classes and styles in the installation of
texlive2011. How can I tell LyX
ubuntu and have texlive installed via apt-get but also manually
> installed texlive2011 in $HOME/texlive.
>
> I adjusted the paths and the binaries are found from LyX, but I can't
> convince LyX to find the LaTeX classes and styles in the installation of
> texlive2011. How can I
Rainer M Krug gmail.com> writes:
>
> If I just could understand what these commands (texhash, mktexlsr, ..) are
doing, then I would no why...
I'm no TeXpert, but TeX maintains a database of package locations, which it uses
when searching for a particular package. The texhash and mktexlsr
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater
problem than having to
manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the
classes/modules employed by the
document.
The transition F14 - F15 was also uneventful.
On Sunday, July 17, 2011 02:02:10
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no
greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual
packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The
transition F14 - F15 was also
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater
problem than having to
manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the
classes/modules employed by the
document.
The transition F14 - F15 was also uneventful.
On Sunday, July 17, 2011 02:02:10
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no
greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual
packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The
transition F14 - F15 was also
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater
problem than having to
manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the
classes/modules employed by the
document.
The transition F14 -> F15 was also uneventful.
On Sunday, July 17, 2011 02:02
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no
greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual
packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The
transition F14 -> F15 was a
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722.
LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's
due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit
one during a critical event (such as a deadline to produce a document
On 07/17/2011 01:02 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722.
LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential
gotcha's
due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit
one during a critical event
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, David L. Johnson wrote:
I did that transition some time ago, since AFAIK tetex is no longer
supported, and texlive is. I do not recall any problems with the
transition.
David,
Yes, Thomas dropped support for tetex last year. Since it worked for me I
saw no need
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722.
LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's
due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit
one during a critical event (such as a deadline to produce a document
On 07/17/2011 01:02 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722.
LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential
gotcha's
due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit
one during a critical event
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, David L. Johnson wrote:
I did that transition some time ago, since AFAIK tetex is no longer
supported, and texlive is. I do not recall any problems with the
transition.
David,
Yes, Thomas dropped support for tetex last year. Since it worked for me I
saw no need
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722.
LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's
due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit
one during a critical event (such as a deadline to produce a document
On 07/17/2011 01:02 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722.
LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential
gotcha's
due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit
one during a critical event
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, David L. Johnson wrote:
I did that transition some time ago, since AFAIK tetex is no longer
supported, and texlive is. I do not recall any problems with the
transition.
David,
Yes, Thomas dropped support for tetex last year. Since it worked for me I
saw no need
on Windows?
Yes, I need to test the installer together with TeXLive (how can we install all the packages used by
LyX, the LyX-specific package, how can I uninstall packages via the command line, etc.
But at first I need to finish the new installer. Later we can add new features.
regards Uwe
together with TeXLive (how can we install
all the packages used by LyX, the LyX-specific package, how can I uninstall
packages via the command line, etc.
For Windows, it would probably be a good idea to have TL with its
tlmgr Package Manager. (Linux distributions omit it, since it seems to
clash
manually because the MiKTeX developer doesn't support packages and fonts that are not under a free
license because some authors of non-free stuff made trouble.
For Windows, it would probably be a good idea to have TL with its
tlmgr Package Manager.
tlmgr is by default part of any TeXLive
on Windows?
Yes, I need to test the installer together with TeXLive (how can we install all the packages used by
LyX, the LyX-specific package, how can I uninstall packages via the command line, etc.
But at first I need to finish the new installer. Later we can add new features.
regards Uwe
together with TeXLive (how can we install
all the packages used by LyX, the LyX-specific package, how can I uninstall
packages via the command line, etc.
For Windows, it would probably be a good idea to have TL with its
tlmgr Package Manager. (Linux distributions omit it, since it seems to
clash
manually because the MiKTeX developer doesn't support packages and fonts that are not under a free
license because some authors of non-free stuff made trouble.
For Windows, it would probably be a good idea to have TL with its
tlmgr Package Manager.
tlmgr is by default part of any TeXLive
on Windows?
Yes, I need to test the installer together with TeXLive (how can we install all the packages used by
LyX, the LyX-specific package, how can I uninstall packages via the command line, etc.
But at first I need to finish the new installer. Later we can add new features.
regards Uwe
t;> drawbacks in using TeX Live instead of MikTeX on Windows?
>
> Yes, I need to test the installer together with TeXLive (how can we install
> all the packages used by LyX, the LyX-specific package, how can I uninstall
> packages via the command line, etc.
>
For Windows, it wou
manually because the MiKTeX developer doesn't support packages and fonts that are not under a free
license because some authors of non-free stuff made trouble.
For Windows, it would probably be a good idea to have TL with its
tlmgr Package Manager.
tlmgr is by default part of any TeXLive
? Are there any
drawbacks in using TeX Live instead of MikTeX on Windows? Cheers
Liviu
[1] http://wiki.lyx.org/Glossary/TeXLive
--
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http
? Are there any
drawbacks in using TeX Live instead of MikTeX on Windows? Cheers
Liviu
[1] http://wiki.lyx.org/Glossary/TeXLive
--
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http
? Are there any
drawbacks in using TeX Live instead of MikTeX on Windows? Cheers
Liviu
[1] http://wiki.lyx.org/Glossary/TeXLive
--
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http
On 2011-06-24, Terrance Wickman wrote:
I am using lyx 2.0. I have installed all packages and files from texlive
2011 (2000 something of them). I am using the fedora stack of both of
them. The latex styles and classes are in my
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ folder. I have texhash
On 2011-06-24, Terrance Wickman wrote:
I am using lyx 2.0. I have installed all packages and files from texlive
2011 (2000 something of them). I am using the fedora stack of both of
them. The latex styles and classes are in my
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ folder. I have texhash
On 2011-06-24, Terrance Wickman wrote:
> I am using lyx 2.0. I have installed all packages and files from texlive
> 2011 (2000 something of them). I am using the fedora stack of both of
> them. The latex styles and classes are in my
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ folder. I
Dear all,
I am using lyx 2.0. I have installed all packages and files from texlive
2011 (2000 something of them). I am using the fedora stack of both of
them. The latex styles and classes are in my
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ folder. I have texhash several times. I
have set the path
Dear all,
I am using lyx 2.0. I have installed all packages and files from texlive
2011 (2000 something of them). I am using the fedora stack of both of
them. The latex styles and classes are in my
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ folder. I have texhash several times. I
have set the path
Dear all,
I am using lyx 2.0. I have installed all packages and files from texlive
2011 (2000 something of them). I am using the fedora stack of both of
them. The latex styles and classes are in my
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ folder. I have texhash several times. I
have set the path
the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
and then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
After installing the repo file and updating the system lyx will work
normally using the new system latex. There is no need to change lyx.
Eventually, just
the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
and then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
After installing the repo file and updating the system lyx will work
normally using the new system latex. There is no need to change lyx.
Eventually, just
t uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
> > and then force the installation of 2010?
> > Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
>
> After installing the repo file and updating the system lyx will work
> normally using the new system l
Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and
then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007? I'm mainly interested in the
reverse
[texlive]
name=TeX Live
baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
enabled=0
metadata_expire=1d
gpgcheck=0
On Wednesday 02 March 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:56:35 Neal Becker wrote:
[texlive]
name=TeX Live
baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
enabled=0
metadata_expire=1d
gpgcheck=0
If you want to use you should define enabled=1 in the above repo file.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
and then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
After installing the repo
Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and
then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007? I'm mainly interested in the
reverse
[texlive]
name=TeX Live
baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
enabled=0
metadata_expire=1d
gpgcheck=0
On Wednesday 02 March 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:56:35 Neal Becker wrote:
[texlive]
name=TeX Live
baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
enabled=0
metadata_expire=1d
gpgcheck=0
If you want to use you should define enabled=1 in the above repo file.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
and then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
After installing the repo
Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and
then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007? I'm mainly interested in the
reverse
[texlive]
name=TeX Live
baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
enabled=0
metadata_expire=1d
gpgcheck=0
On Wednesday 02 March 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Can you please tell me what did you do?
> Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come wi
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:56:35 Neal Becker wrote:
> [texlive]
> name=TeX Live
> baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
> enabled=0
> metadata_expire=1d
> gpgcheck=0
If you want to use you should define enabled=1 in the above repo file.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Can you please tell me what did you do?
> Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
> and then force the installation of 2010?
> Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
Afte
On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
texlive 2010 work very well
On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
texlive 2010 work very well
On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
> On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
>> > This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
>> > package from Jindrich Novy
>> > <jn...@redhat.com>
>> >
>> > checking for a Latex2e program...
>> >
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
>> On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
>>> > This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
>>> > package from Jindrich Novy
>>> > <jn...@redhat.com>
>>> >
>>>
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
checking for a DVI postprocessing program...
+checking for pplatex... no
checking for pLaTeX, the Japanese LaTeX...
+checking for platex... yes
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8
versions.
I have debian lenny.
Marcelo
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8
versions. I
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
checking for a DVI postprocessing program...
+checking for pplatex... no
checking for pLaTeX, the Japanese LaTeX...
+checking for platex... yes
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8
versions.
I have debian lenny.
Marcelo
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex... yes
texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8
versions. I
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy
<jn...@redhat.com>
checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for "latex"... yes
checking for a DVI postprocessing program...
+checking for "pplatex"... no
checking for pLaTeX, the Japanese LaTe
> This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
> package from Jindrich Novy
> <jn...@redhat.com>
>
> checking for a Latex2e program...
> +checking for "latex"... yes
texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8
versions.
I have debian lenny.
Marcelo
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
> > This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
> > package from Jindrich Novy
> > <jn...@redhat.com>
> >
> > checking for a Latex2e program...
> > +checking for "latex"... yes
>
> texlive
Use the TeXLive Utility and update.
Thanks. I'll try this.
Cheers, Sam
Use the TeXLive Utility and update.
Thanks. I'll try this.
Cheers, Sam
> Use the TeXLive Utility and update.
Thanks. I'll try this.
Cheers, Sam
Dear All,
This is slightly off-topic.
I have successfully used biblatex with LyX for a long time. Today after
changing my TexLive DVD installation from 2009 to 2010, I am not able to
compile documents anymore that use the biblatex package. I now get a fatal
error message that elatex
Use the TeXLive Utility and update.
el
On 1/13/11 12:33 AM, Sam Lewis wrote:
Dear All,
This is slightly off-topic.
I have successfully used biblatex with LyX for a long time. Today
after changing my TexLive DVD installation from 2009 to 2010, I am
not able to compile documents anymore
Dear All,
This is slightly off-topic.
I have successfully used biblatex with LyX for a long time. Today after
changing my TexLive DVD installation from 2009 to 2010, I am not able to
compile documents anymore that use the biblatex package. I now get a fatal
error message that elatex
Use the TeXLive Utility and update.
el
On 1/13/11 12:33 AM, Sam Lewis wrote:
Dear All,
This is slightly off-topic.
I have successfully used biblatex with LyX for a long time. Today
after changing my TexLive DVD installation from 2009 to 2010, I am
not able to compile documents anymore
Dear All,
This is slightly off-topic.
I have successfully used biblatex with LyX for a long time. Today after
changing my TexLive DVD installation from 2009 to 2010, I am not able to
compile documents anymore that use the biblatex package. I now get a fatal
error message that elatex
301 - 400 of 794 matches
Mail list logo
