>> They were going to get a 4xx anyway. I changed the message to *help*
>> SendGrid.
Yes but if you can change the message for SendGrid only, you can accept the
mail and let it through
>> Where do I find out what the IP/domain is? Is it in my mail logs,
Apparently you were a
On 2023-06-22 02:05:40, Sebastian Nielsen via mailop wrote:
> >> They were going to get a 4xx anyway. I changed the message to *help*
> >> SendGrid.
>
> Yes but if you can change the message for SendGrid only, you can
> accept the mail and let it through... Apparen
They are not known for having a positive reputation in general. If you search
the archives of this list, you will see various experiences people have had.
I have a vendor who used SendGrid to send notifications for their app to my
agency. The SendGrid mail server ip’s would be blacklisted
Hi,
Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look
fairly convincing.
A few paypals, and a few amazons.
I thought sendgrid were ok? Has somebody leaked a big pile of
sendgrid usernames and passwords or something?
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
page, they are sent a
> confirmation via a Smartertools email.
> 2.) We use SendGrid to email them in the future with newsletters, tools, and
> other marketing information.
> 3.) We just aren't inboxing with Gmail. Never have, despite the customer
> opting in.
>
> Questions:
>
On 3/22/24 14:58, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
If they are 'dedicated', doesn't matter if they are coming from
SendGrid, the PTR should reflect your clients domain.
host 149.72.234.90
90.234.72.149.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
wrqvzxrx.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net
Simon Greenwood via mailop skrev den 2023-02-24 22:09:
This (which I didn't know) adds a whole different aspect to the issue
- much has been said about how email is now centralised and is almost
impractical to run as a small operator level, but if a company like
Shopify and indeed Sen
Hi everyone,
Is anyone from SendGrid on-list that can help with an abuse report that has
gone unanswered?
We have two tickets with SendGrid that have *no response: *4218173 and
4278230.
This fraud account is phishing our users, so there's no reason SendGrid
shouldn't be able to sus
Smartertools email.
2.) We use SendGrid to email them in the future with newsletters, tools,
and other marketing information.
3.) We just aren't inboxing with Gmail. Never have, despite the customer
opting in.
Questions:
1.) Can anyone recommend a solution?
2.) Should we be integrating Smarter
of the few things that is specifically illegal under
CAN SPAM.
Perhaps we can collect them all and then sue both Sendgrid and Zoom.
So, just an update...
I can confirm, for sure, that there's no actual Zoom / Sendgrid
unsubscribe link in the spams based on the most recent spams that I
allowe
On 2020-08-18 20:23:37 (+0800), Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
The one I've seen most often is 12340469 with 9789821 a close second and
8512936 in third place.
Given that these are so blatant, I don't believe there'
> Interesting to me Atro said this is sendgrid. I saw sendgrid format
> sender address but headers do no show any sendgrid. So now its
> harder to give due suspision on sendgrid because they give full
> infrastructure to rent for other domain like intuit?
Yes.
Full headers (munged of
ded.
>
> Thanks, everyone.
>
> Luke
>
I have a hunch that some time ago (just before the increased spam via SendGrid
started) there might have been an
unauthorized access to SendGrid customer data which allowed hackers to
bruteforce hashed passwords and use valid
accounts to send
On 11/08/2020 20:41, Matt Harris via mailop wrote:
We'd been using sendgrid in production for some stuff, but we're
looking at changing that now because it seems like their lack of
concern regarding abuse on their platform will lead to more and more
deliverability issu
On 10/19/2020 8:29 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> I'm getting a steady stream of spam from Sendgrid purporting to be
> Efax messages, with what appears to be an XLS spreadsheet attached.
> The return addresses are all over the place but they all come through
> Sendgrid, e.g.
,
email geeks, maawg slack, linkedin, abuse@, support@. I bet you'd find
someone willing to help correct the issue.
I work at sendgrid and manage response handling. If someone were to reach
out with an obvious problem, I'd be willing and able to adjust our response
handling appropriate
I've instituted short-term blocks of Sendgrid mail several times this year
and started another today because it looks like as much as a third of the
mail they've sent us in the past week has been evil -- mostly phishing.
This is a problem for me because some of the mail Sendgrid sends
level, but if a company like
Shopify and indeed Sendgrid can't assure mail delivery because the
largest mail operators will reject mail sporadically based on
non-specific criteria, and more that someone in Christine's position
doesn't have someone they can call at Google or Microso
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
If you block only spammers you'd be right. But SendGrid is one of the
sorry cases where you have spam and legit, sometimes important e-mails
coming from the same network. Your users won't be happy if you reject
their order con
Am 11.08.20 um 16:53 schrieb Benoit Panizzon via mailop:
> Hi List
>
> o1678912x138.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net [167.89.12.138] and IP under
> control of sendgrid was repeatedly involved in phishing and other spam
> since June.
>
> It ended up being blacklisted @ SWINO
Huh, I'm not seeing that Sendgrid account ID in my traps at all in the
last few days. Different traps for different folks, I guess?
Cheers,
Al
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:06 PM Luke via mailop wrote:
>
> In the Return-Path. "bounces+1234567" the number following bounce
just block them completely?
>
I've been very saddened. Sendgrid was a reputable ESP that has fallen
from grace. About 6-7 months ago, we started seeing pretty large
amounts of spam from them. I've personally tried reaching out to Twilio
/ Sendgrid leadership to alert them to the issue.
Hi Sendgrid and Zoom,
We've been over this before, multiple times... But alas, it looks like
that you neither of you seem to care a single bit about your services
being used to send spams that can't be unsubscribed from.
Yep, I know you, Sendgrid, told me that you'd be wor
On 2020-08-11 16:53:46, Benoit Panizzon via mailop wrote:
>
> Now a sendgrid customers complains to us, that his emails are being
> rejected because of this listing.
>
> But that makes me wonder: Doesn't sendgrid deal with such issues like
> asking for delisting after blo
In the Return-Path. "bounces+1234567" the number following bounces+ is the
SendGrid account ID.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:57 AM Carl Byington via mailop
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:23 +0300, Atro Tossavainen via
[167.89.93.232])
Yes, the mail arrives from systems with rdns of *.sg.zoom.us, but my
understanding is that the X-Entity-ID points to a sendgrid user. And the
headers include stuff like:
Received: by filter1889p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id
filter1889p1las1-10585-60DE6FD0-E
2021-07-02 01:45
> Yep, I know you, Sendgrid, told me that you'd be working on it with
> Zoom. And, as expected, nothing ever happened and they still keep
> coming.
About 0.3% of the spams that Koli-Lõks spamtraps got from SendGrid
in December 2021 matched .zoom.us.
It's large enough to
On 6/17/20 1:50 PM, Robert L Mathews via mailop wrote:
> Several months ago I suggested (among other things) that SendGrid block
> "From" headers matching prominent domain names until the messages have
> been manually reviewed. The fact that "don't let random customers
These still seem to be coming in quite consistently... Same Zoom
sendgrid account.
Any updates on whats going on with this, Luke?
On 7/6/21 2:44 PM, Brielle via mailop wrote:
Here's the two that they all share:
Return-path:
Return-path:
(original unmunged version sent directly t
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:00:35 +0100
From: Tim Bray
To: mailop
Subject: [mailop] Sendgrid and phishing
Message-ID: <1f6aca35-94ef-70a0-bd75-49a5d632d...@kooky.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi,
Anybod
turned 1 object
>
>refer:whois.arin.net
>
>as-block: 10240-12287
>organisation: Assigned by ARIN
>
>whois:whois.arin.net
>descr:Assigned by ARIN
>
>source: IANA
>
># whois.arin.net
>
>ASNumber: 11377
>ASName: S
Hello,
At 05:23 AM 18-08-2020, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
I am receiving emails from Sendgrid about "Nedbank Credit Card
monthly Charges eStatement". The account is 17343945. It looks like
a phishing attempt. Th
ed on."
Best,
Faisal
PGP Key: [C8FD029B](https://pgp.faisal.ec/)
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:00 AM, Tim Bray via mailop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look
> fairly convincing.
>
> A few paypals, and a few amazons.
>
> I thou
Hi List
o1678912x138.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net [167.89.12.138] and IP under
control of sendgrid was repeatedly involved in phishing and other spam
since June.
It ended up being blacklisted @ SWINOG.
Now a sendgrid customers complains to us, that his emails are being
rejected because of this
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
Method: get all SendGrid mail from yesterday and today, restrict to
anything that says "quota full" in the subject, look at accounts sending.
Sample size is measured in the dozens, across about ten recipient domains.
They were a
> You think we would be done with SendGrid conversations two years ago..
No such thing.
> And two hours later, a phishing attempt from a SendGrid IP hit the
> spam folder...
>
> Return-Path:
> Received: from wrqvndzq.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net (HELO
> wrqvndzq.outbo
hat they are doing with that
> > mail stream, but it doesn't look good.
> >
> > Both of the accounts reported by Michael have been suspended.
> >
> > Thanks, everyone.
> >
> > Luke
> >
> I have a hunch that some time ago (just before the incr
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 07:48:12AM -0700, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> Since on the topic of SendGrid..
http://mainsleaze.spambouncer.org/2019-11-to-2020-04-in-spamtraps-esps/
The trends for Salesforce and SendGrid are remarkably upwards...
--
Atro Tossavainen, Chairman of the Bo
il_signature>
EMAIL l...@twilio.com
TWITTER @LenShneyder <https://twitter.com/LenShneyder>Message: 6
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:53:46 +0200
From: Benoit Panizzon
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] Delisting request from sendgrid customer about ip
used in recent phishing campaign.
Mes
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 08:03:40PM +0200, Carsten Schiefner via mailop wrote:
> how about elaborating a bit further on the whats and whys of your setup?
Maybe some of us could learn something from that, or maybe SendGrid
would consider that to be giving an advantage to competitors. Rea
Thank you everyone. Is there any recommendation on other 3rd party senders that
can be trusted instead of SendGrid. My last resort will be to setup some MTA's
with the few free IP they have from the Datacenter.
I also understand that the client is in the middle of a catch-22 in ter
Hello,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:00:44AM +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> Any chance SendGrid might amend its ticket system so that there would
> be autoreplies when tickets are created that showed issue numbers
> connected with the original request
It would also be great if
Hi
> Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look
> fairly convincing.
>
> A few paypals, and a few amazons.
Add Netflix
Add Joe-Jobs
> I thought sendgrid were ok? Has somebody leaked a big pile of
> sendgrid usernames and passwords or something?
an not in any reasonable stretch be put into the same bucket as child
pornography and beheading videos. Trying to make /that/ argument is what
is really irresponsible.
> As someone else already said, Sendgrid is not the government. They
> have every right to decline to sign up undesirable custome
correspond to the SendGrid user IDs
Return-Path: Here's the two that they all share:
>
> Return-path:
> Return-path:
>
> (original unmunged version sent directly to you, Luke)
>
> I've got zoom messages via sendgrid being rejected via a system
> filter curr
On 12/23/2019 10:42 PM, Carl Byington via mailop wrote:
> The spam was sent with a From: header of @email.chase.com.
> _dmarc.email.chase.com. has a txt record with p=reject, so it was
> rejected here. Sendgrid - you should be able to check that at your end,
> and just not send a
; Hi everyone,
>
> Is anyone from SendGrid on-list that can help with an abuse report that
> has gone unanswered?
>
> We have two tickets with SendGrid that have *no response: *4218173 and
> 4278230.
>
> This fraud account is phishing our users, so there's no reason Sen
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:49, Rob McEwen via mailop wrote:
> These questions! WOW! IS THIS FOR REAL? Don't get me wrong, I like Len
> Shneyder
> and I think he's a good person TRYING to do the right thing - but -
> considering what is coming
> FROM SendGrid in recent
>>The RFC forbids doing that, and I argued against it
The RFC and reality is two different things. If a client don't want to retry, I
think they are free to choose to not retry.
Why even send retry requests to SendGrid?
Just accept the email, whats the problem?
If your antivi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:23 +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
Where do you find that account number in the headers? I see some from
today with "Upgrade (FINAL WARNING)
.us [149.72.199.144])
> >
> >> Received: from o12.ptr3622.sg.zoom.us (o12.ptr3622.sg.zoom.us
> >> [167.89.93.232])
> >
> > Yes, the mail arrives from systems with rdns of *.sg.zoom.us, but my
> > understanding is that the X-Entity-ID points to a s
So, hey, yeah, Sendgrid and Zoom...
It's still going on even though it was 'being looked into'.
Why do you not respect permanent errors when delivering? My system is
rejecting the mails, so Sendgrid's systems should be marking the mails
as undeliverables and removing the
Hello,
> It would also be great if SendGrid would include an abuse reporting
> URL in the headers of each message, specific to that message, i.e.
> that passes along all info that SendGrid would need to identify that
> campaign/client.
I’m not so sure about that, having in mind t
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:00:35 +0100, Tim Bray via mailop
wrote:
>Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look
>fairly convincing.
General spam (several per week) and phishing, especially some very nicely done
"Reconfirm you Netflix payment method" at
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 14:34 -0700, Carl Byington via mailop wrote:
>
> dhl is asking folks to reject that mail, but sendgrid tries to send it
> anyway.
>
Sendgrid doesn't seem to do any From: address authentication. They're sending
email pretending to be from all kinds
I'm getting a steady stream of spam from Sendgrid purporting to be
Efax messages, with what appears to be an XLS spreadsheet attached.
The return addresses are all over the place but they all come through
Sendgrid, e.g.,
Subject: E-FAX - 963554 DNW
You have a new fax! Click the attachme
Bulk mail, email marketing, consumer email, enterprise email. Those are
all different businesses. Just because a company does one thing doesn't
mean it should be doing (or be good at) the other.
That's correct, but in that case what Sendgrid should do is to use a
specific sub
Hello,
Anyone here have a contact for Zoom in re of webinar spam being sent
from their platform via Sendgrid owned IPs?
I'm rather unhappy with the fact they're allowing people to spam with no
unsubscribe or report feature.
I know Sendgrid is a hot steaming pile of dog excrement
ANNOUNCEMENT: The NEW invaluement "Service Provider DNSBLs" - 1st one
for Sendgrid-spams!
...a collection of a new TYPE of DNSBL, with the FIRST of these having a
focus on Sendgrid-sent spams. AND - there is a FREE version of this -
that can be used NOW! (/well... might need a Sp
Are you sure that it was Sendgrid that blocked the message ? Looks to
me as if ab...@sendgrid.com is hosted at gmail and it was *gmail* that
objected to the content ...
Or am I misunderstanding something ?
No, of course you're right.
But forwarding an abuse address that is som
Hi Everyone,
I am wondering if someone here might have some insight into an issue I am
experiencing with Gmail customers. Here are the details:
1.) When the customers click to opt-in on our form page, they are sent a
confirmation via a Smartertools email.
2.) We use SendGrid to email them in the
67.89.93.232])
Yes, the mail arrives from systems with rdns of *.sg.zoom.us, but my
understanding is that the X-Entity-ID points to a sendgrid user. And the
headers include stuff like:
Received: by filter1889p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id
filter1889p1las1-10585-60DE6FD0-E
2021-07-02 01:45:
On 4/19/22 1:46 PM, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
They're definitely the biggest ESP in our spamtraps, have been
for more than a year solid.
Yep. As most probably remember, someone from SendGrid came on the list
for a while, made some noises about cleaning things up, and
Here's the two that they all share:
Return-path:
Return-path:
(original unmunged version sent directly to you, Luke)
I've got zoom messages via sendgrid being rejected via a system filter
currently, so there should be a bit of bounce messages going back at
Zoom/Sendgrid, but yet
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 2:21 PM Michael Orlitzky via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> In the past few months there have been several threads on mailop and
> similar lists (sdlu, spamassassin-users, nanog, ...) complaining about
> how SendGrid doesn't seem to do anythin
t: Re: [mailop] Contact for Zoom webinar spam sent via Sendgrid
> (ugh)
> Message-ID: <737bf486-f945-c64b-a7ef-9575e1f6d...@2mbit.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> These still seem to be coming in quite consistently... Same Zoom
> sendg
On 09/01/2022 13:44, Brie via mailop wrote:
Hi Sendgrid and Zoom,
We've been over this before, multiple times... But alas, it looks like
that you neither of you seem to care a single bit about your services
being used to send spams that can't be unsubscribed from.
Yep,
These questions! WOW! IS THIS FOR REAL? Don't get me wrong, I like Len
Shneyder and I think he's a good person TRYING to do the right thing -
but - considering what is coming FROM SendGrid in recent years, is this
the right time to be giving OTHERS anti-abuse/security advice? Just.
It appears that Kelly Molloy via mailop said:
>On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 7:14 PM Matt Palmer via mailop
> wrote:
>> That's something to talk to your ESP about. They're in charge of retrying.
>
>Christine *is* the ESP.
She's at Shopify, but Sendgrid is the E
On 2023-06-22 00:32:37, Sebastian Nielsen via mailop wrote:
> Why even send retry requests to SendGrid?
> Just accept the email, whats the problem?
>
> If your antivirus or mail scanning solution requires some time,
> buffer the email at your server instead. I do understand i
cket numbers to follow up.
Thanks Will for picking up.
Any chance SendGrid might amend its ticket system so that there would
be autoreplies when tickets are created that showed issue numbers
connected with the original request, and/or that any further
correspondence would similarly include anything from
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 02:15:07PM +, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:00:44AM +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> > Any chance SendGrid might amend its ticket system so that there would
> > be autoreplies when tickets are crea
a good person TRYING to do the right thing - but -
>> considering what is coming
>> FROM SendGrid in recent years, is this the right time to be giving OTHERS
>> anti-abuse/security
>> advice? Just... wow! I think they should instead consider trying to "lead by
>&g
x27;d like to confirm that Zoom is sending quite
a bit to our spamtraps too.
Unredacted headers are not forthcoming as we're not interested in
revealing spamtraps.
I should also say that I find it offensive for SendGrid support employees
to ask for the same in support responses, which seems t
On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 08:42 +, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
>
> In the specific case at hand it seems that the OP is greylisting
> SendGrid for being on some sort of blocklist, and the specific
> mention of "blacklist" in the 4xx response is hitting a SendGrid
> h
On 3/22/23 01:35, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
I tried to report a phishing spam to Sendgrid, and look what I got:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
(reason: 552-5.7.0 This message was blocked because its content presents a
potential
On 1/22/21 10:51 AM, Gregory Heytings via mailop wrote:
That's correct, but in that case what Sendgrid should do is to use a
specific subdomain for abuse reports, e.g. use ab...@abuse.sendgrid.com
instead of ab...@sendgrid.com, and run their own mailserver on
abuse.sendgrid.com. If two
-0800 (PST)
> X-Received: by 10.107.10.233 with SMTP id
> 102mr38147900iok.31.1447771620037;
> Tue, 17 Nov 2015 06:47:00 -0800 (PST)
> Return-Path: sendgrid@email.domain.com>
> Received: from o1.mail_sg1.DOMAIN.com (o1.mail_sg1.DOMAIN.com.
> [167.89.67.18
The very first reply to this thread was from a SendGrid representative.
They generally respond pretty quickly any time they are mentioned here.
Luke
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:24 AM Brielle via mailop
wrote:
> On 5/11/2020 11:45 AM, Matt V via mailop wrote:
> > On 2020-05-05 11:09 p
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 08:55 -0500, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:00:35 +0100, Tim Bray via mailop w
> rote:
> > Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look fairly
> > convincing.
>
> General spam (several per week) and p
Am 22.01.21 um 15:22 schrieb Andrew C Aitchison via mailop:
>
> Are you sure that it was Sendgrid that blocked the message ?
> Looks to me as if ab...@sendgrid.com is hosted at gmail and
> it was *gmail* that objected to the content ...
>
> Or am I misunderstanding something
On 10/14/2024 at 05:31, Paul Menzel via mailop wrote:
Since at least September 17th, 2024, we receive a lot of unsolicited
messages from SendGrid. I forwarded five to ab...@sendgrid.net, but
there was no reply and the problem persists. Today at least five
messages from xvfrkpcc.outbound
;
TWITTER @LenShneyder <https://twitter.com/LenShneyder>
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:53:46 +0200
From: Benoit Panizzon <mailto:benoit.paniz...@imp.ch>>
To: mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
Subject: [mailop] Delisting request from sendgrid customer abou
Dnia 7.10.2019 o godz. 10:43:14 Scott Techlist via mailop pisze:
>
> What about relaying outbound mail via services like Sendgrid? Not sure it
> that will make it better, or worse since they send marketing stuff. And
> Google probably looking at the source server headers anyway.
M
eed caused by
> mails actually sent from sendgrid. For example,
> and +6019856-0d96-@sg.e.doodle.com> are doodle notifications
> sent to two different mail addresses. I don't know whether the time
> also takes part in the hash computation (as in SRS).
I see the same later
> I've been very saddened. Sendgrid was a reputable ESP that has fallen
> from grace. About 6-7 months ago, we started seeing pretty large
> amounts of spam from them.
Exactly - this tracks with the timeline when a) they ceased being certified by
us, b) certain key people
On 2022-08-15 17:42, Stuart Henderson via mailop wrote:
yes yes, but the point is that Twilio SendGrid are allowing their services
to be used by whoever is sending this. With a website saying things like
"We take trust and security seriously" and "With the industry’s largest
t
?
>
> this is softfails not hardfails, so mail in queue will try next 5 days
> to deliver it, if that expire it would be returned to sender
It is transient, but they are blocks and are not retried. Weird,
right?
That's something to talk to your ESP about. They're in char
I'm seeing a very significant drop off of sendgrid-originated spam.
Couple of minor phish/419 in the past 24 hours.
Anybody else?
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 12:03 +, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> From: "chiark.greenend.org.uk"
So sendgrid account 15204622 was sending mail as:
Received: from dhl.com (unknown)
by ismtpd0005p1lon1.sendgrid.net (SG)
ten very subjective opinion - against
> another' subjective opinion - about the content. So I 100% strongly
> disagree with this opinion that Sendgrid should be the political
> "thought police" for LEGAL content that is sent from their platform.
I've never understood this line
Hello Tobi,
Your friendly sendgrid community member here. Could you send me headers off
list? Would love to see what you are experiencing.
Thanks for your help.
Ryan
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, 6:02 AM Tobi via mailop wrote:
> We're currently seeing quite a bunch of messages from
On 5/5/2020 5:50 PM, Carl Byington via mailop wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 07:48 -0700, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> > This is a little too obvious, and while historically SendGrid ran a
> > tight ship, and got a little lee way from spam auditors.. it's getting
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 15:06 -0700, Jay Hennigan via mailop wrote:
> On 5/5/20 14:30, Blake Hudson via mailop wrote:
> > Been getting a variety of Amex scams for several weeks via SendGrid.
> > Wish they had a better reporting me
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:23 +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
Where do you find that account number in the headers? I see some from
today with "Upgrade (FINAL WARNING)" in the subject, but no indication
h of what comes from Sendgrid, is bulk unsolicited email. Sendgrid
are spammers. It doesn't matter whether they spam encouraging or
discouraging COVID vaccination, it's still spam.
--
Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7
7;t technically
Sendgrid who perform the filtering this approach has the effect of putting a
content filter on the abuse mailbox.
You're assuming that Sendgrid actually cares about or reads abuse
complaints in the first place. The spam is a steady flow, nothing new.
In Sendgrid's case, f
On 12/02/2021 04:26, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:49, Rob McEwen via mailop
He's not even trying to let people guess Sendgrid is good at preventing
abuses.
Why would he? because they are not good at it, sendgrid are blocked
here, have been for w m
If you could share the return-path of the offending message, I can have it
looked at.
Cheers,
Luke
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 11:39 AM Brielle via mailop
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone here have a contact for Zoom in re of webinar spam being sent
> from their platform via Sendgrid owned
st seemed to say that it was all sendgrid, not taking into
> account whether it was spam or not. Correct?
Any mail received at our spamtraps, of whose composition you might
have a fairly decent idea, identified as being sent by SendGrid. As
I said and you quoted it back at me,
>> So,
1 - 100 of 746 matches
Mail list logo
