Hi,
Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look
fairly convincing.
A few paypals, and a few amazons.
I thought sendgrid were ok? Has somebody leaked a big pile of
sendgrid usernames and passwords or something?
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
Hi everyone,
Is anyone from SendGrid on-list that can help with an abuse report that has
gone unanswered?
We have two tickets with SendGrid that have *no response: *4218173 and
4278230.
This fraud account is phishing our users, so there's no reason SendGrid
shouldn't be able to suspend / ban
They are not known for having a positive reputation in general. If you search
the archives of this list, you will see various experiences people have had.
I have a vendor who used SendGrid to send notifications for their app to my
agency. The SendGrid mail server ip’s would be blacklisted
Hello,
> It would also be great if SendGrid would include an abuse reporting
> URL in the headers of each message, specific to that message, i.e.
> that passes along all info that SendGrid would need to identify that
> campaign/client.
I’m not so sure about that, having in mind t
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 07:48:12AM -0700, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> Since on the topic of SendGrid..
http://mainsleaze.spambouncer.org/2019-11-to-2020-04-in-spamtraps-esps/
The trends for Salesforce and SendGrid are remarkably upwards...
--
Atro Tossavainen, Chairman of the Bo
Hello,
At 05:23 AM 18-08-2020, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
I am receiving emails from Sendgrid about "Nedbank Credit Card
monthly Charges eStatement". The account is 17343945. It looks like
a phishing attempt. Th
On 2020-08-18 20:23:37 (+0800), Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
The one I've seen most often is 12340469 with 9789821 a close second and
8512936 in third place.
Given that these are so blatant, I don't believe there's any point
On 10/19/2020 8:29 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> I'm getting a steady stream of spam from Sendgrid purporting to be
> Efax messages, with what appears to be an XLS spreadsheet attached.
> The return addresses are all over the place but they all come through
> Sendgrid, e.g.,
Jo
On 2020-05-05 11:09 p.m., Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
I've been told by at least one Sendgrid person that they have requested
membership to the list and are awaiting administrator approvals...
--
~
MATT
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
I'm seeing a very significant drop off of sendgrid-originated spam.
Couple of minor phish/419 in the past 24 hours.
Anybody else?
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Good day Guys
Got this off Hackernews. Thought I would share the link.
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2020/08/sendgrid-under-siege-from-hacked-accounts/
Interesting comments too.
Regards
Brent
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https
On 2021-05-05 14:43:35, Brian Weir via mailop wrote:
> I would definitely stay away from SendGrid unless you get a dedicated IP.
Can you say more about why that is? I'm curious to know more about
how blocked/unblocked SendGrid is
___
mailop mailing l
m page, they are sent a
> confirmation via a Smartertools email.
> 2.) We use SendGrid to email them in the future with newsletters, tools, and
> other marketing information.
> 3.) We just aren't inboxing with Gmail. Never have, despite the customer
> opting in.
>
> Questions:
> 1.) C
On 2021-10-20 18:12:32, Luke via mailop wrote:
> For clarification, it has been 12 years. But point taken. Thanks.
>
The causal relationship may be me editorializing, but prior to the
Twilio acquisition, I held no strong opinions about SendGrid and
that's probably the best that can be said
m completely?
>
I've been very saddened. Sendgrid was a reputable ESP that has fallen
from grace. About 6-7 months ago, we started seeing pretty large
amounts of spam from them. I've personally tried reaching out to Twilio
/ Sendgrid leadership to alert them to the issue.
The KAM.cf ruleset has
On 11/08/2020 20:41, Matt Harris via mailop wrote:
We'd been using sendgrid in production for some stuff, but we're
looking at changing that now because it seems like their lack of
concern regarding abuse on their platform will lead to more and more
deliverability issues as time
Hi Sendgrid and Zoom,
We've been over this before, multiple times... But alas, it looks like
that you neither of you seem to care a single bit about your services
being used to send spams that can't be unsubscribed from.
Yep, I know you, Sendgrid, told me that you'd be working
things that is specifically illegal under
CAN SPAM.
Perhaps we can collect them all and then sue both Sendgrid and Zoom.
So, just an update...
I can confirm, for sure, that there's no actual Zoom / Sendgrid
unsubscribe link in the spams based on the most recent spams that I
allowed in to analyze
I'm getting a steady stream of spam from Sendgrid purporting to be
Efax messages, with what appears to be an XLS spreadsheet attached.
The return addresses are all over the place but they all come through
Sendgrid, e.g.,
Subject: E-FAX - 963554 DNW
You have a new fax! Click the attachment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:23 +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
Where do you find that account number in the headers? I see some from
today with "Upgrade (FINAL
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 14:34 -0700, Carl Byington via mailop wrote:
>
> dhl is asking folks to reject that mail, but sendgrid tries to send it
> anyway.
>
Sendgrid doesn't seem to do any From: address authentication. They're sending
email pretending to be from all kinds of random
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:00:35 +0100, Tim Bray via mailop
wrote:
>Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look
>fairly convincing.
General spam (several per week) and phishing, especially some very nicely done
"Reconfirm you Netflix payment method" at
Am 22.01.21 um 15:22 schrieb Andrew C Aitchison via mailop:
>
> Are you sure that it was Sendgrid that blocked the message ?
> Looks to me as if ab...@sendgrid.com is hosted at gmail and
> it was *gmail* that objected to the content ...
>
> Or am I misunderstanding something
Bulk mail, email marketing, consumer email, enterprise email. Those are
all different businesses. Just because a company does one thing doesn't
mean it should be doing (or be good at) the other.
That's correct, but in that case what Sendgrid should do is to use a
specific subdomain
Hello,
Anyone here have a contact for Zoom in re of webinar spam being sent
from their platform via Sendgrid owned IPs?
I'm rather unhappy with the fact they're allowing people to spam with no
unsubscribe or report feature.
I know Sendgrid is a hot steaming pile of dog excrement these days
On 1/22/21 10:51 AM, Gregory Heytings via mailop wrote:
That's correct, but in that case what Sendgrid should do is to use a
specific subdomain for abuse reports, e.g. use ab...@abuse.sendgrid.com
instead of ab...@sendgrid.com, and run their own mailserver on
abuse.sendgrid.com. If two other
These questions! WOW! IS THIS FOR REAL? Don't get me wrong, I like Len
Shneyder and I think he's a good person TRYING to do the right thing -
but - considering what is coming FROM SendGrid in recent years, is this
the right time to be giving OTHERS anti-abuse/security advice? Just...
wow! I
On 12/23/2019 10:42 PM, Carl Byington via mailop wrote:
> The spam was sent with a From: header of @email.chase.com.
> _dmarc.email.chase.com. has a txt record with p=reject, so it was
> rejected here. Sendgrid - you should be able to check that at your end,
> and just not s
one,
>
> Is anyone from SendGrid on-list that can help with an abuse report that
> has gone unanswered?
>
> We have two tickets with SendGrid that have *no response: *4218173 and
> 4278230.
>
> This fraud account is phishing our users, so there's no reason SendGrid
> shou
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
Method: get all SendGrid mail from yesterday and today, restrict to
anything that says "quota full" in the subject, look at accounts sending.
Sample size is measured in the dozens, across about ten recipient domains.
They wer
In the Return-Path. "bounces+1234567" the number following bounces+ is the
SendGrid account ID.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:57 AM Carl Byington via mailop
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:23 +0300, Atro Tossav
ANNOUNCEMENT: The NEW invaluement "Service Provider DNSBLs" - 1st one
for Sendgrid-spams!
...a collection of a new TYPE of DNSBL, with the FIRST of these having a
focus on Sendgrid-sent spams. AND - there is a FREE version of this -
that can be used NOW! (/well... might need a Sp
On 2020-08-11 16:53:46, Benoit Panizzon via mailop wrote:
>
> Now a sendgrid customers complains to us, that his emails are being
> rejected because of this listing.
>
> But that makes me wonder: Doesn't sendgrid deal with such issues like
> asking for delisting after blocking
Hi List
o1678912x138.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net [167.89.12.138] and IP under
control of sendgrid was repeatedly involved in phishing and other spam
since June.
It ended up being blacklisted @ SWINOG.
Now a sendgrid customers complains to us, that his emails are being
rejected because
on."
Best,
Faisal
PGP Key: [C8FD029B](https://pgp.faisal.ec/)
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:00 AM, Tim Bray via mailop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look
> fairly convincing.
>
> A few paypals, and a few amazons.
>
> I thought s
Are you sure that it was Sendgrid that blocked the message ? Looks to
me as if ab...@sendgrid.com is hosted at gmail and it was *gmail* that
objected to the content ...
Or am I misunderstanding something ?
No, of course you're right.
But forwarding an abuse address that is somewhat
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:49, Rob McEwen via mailop wrote:
> These questions! WOW! IS THIS FOR REAL? Don't get me wrong, I like Len
> Shneyder
> and I think he's a good person TRYING to do the right thing - but -
> considering what is coming
> FROM SendGrid in recent years, is
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
If you block only spammers you'd be right. But SendGrid is one of the
sorry cases where you have spam and legit, sometimes important e-mails
coming from the same network. Your users won't be happy if you reject
their order confirmations
> You think we would be done with SendGrid conversations two years ago..
No such thing.
> And two hours later, a phishing attempt from a SendGrid IP hit the
> spam folder...
>
> Return-Path:
> Received: from wrqvndzq.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net (HELO
> wrqvndzq.outbo
On 4/19/22 1:46 PM, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
They're definitely the biggest ESP in our spamtraps, have been
for more than a year solid.
Yep. As most probably remember, someone from SendGrid came on the list
for a while, made some noises about cleaning things up
On 5/5/20 14:30, Blake Hudson via mailop wrote:
Been getting a variety of Amex scams for several weeks via SendGrid.
Wish they had a better reporting mechanism.
The reporting mechanism is fine. There just isn't anyone who cares on
the other end of it.
--
Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net
Network
On 5/11/2020 11:45 AM, Matt V via mailop wrote:
On 2020-05-05 11:09 p.m., Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
I've been told by at least one Sendgrid person that they have requested
membership to the list and are awaiting administrator approvals...
Better late than never I guess...
--
Brielle
> I don't see any drop in volumes here. I just spent 10 minutes
> looking at anything hitting traps today from Sendgrid ASN and soon
> found plenty of concern:
I concur with Steve.
http://www.atro.fi/sendgrid.png
Y axis is linear, thin line is trendline.
--
Atro Tossavainen
On 12/21/20 17:21, John Levine via mailop wrote:
Now they're sending antivax spam from the pseudoscientific Weston A. Price
foundation.
As long as the checks don't bounce, I don't think Sendgrid really cares
if the mail does.
--
Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
e already said, Sendgrid is not the government. They
have every right to decline to sign up undesirable customers.
R's,
John
PS: As we all know, every complex problem has an answer that is clear,
simple, and wrong.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:11 AM Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
>
> Strange that Sendgrid, being an email company, does not even self-host it's
> company email, but resorts to Google for this. Doesn't look very
> professional...
>
Bulk mail, email marketing, consumer email, e
It appears that Luke via mailop said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>If you could share the return-path of the offending message, I can have it
>looked at.
I have a banking phish from dorfj-emigrant@dr.com sent to
nob...@johnlevine.com
and an invitation from m...@ippodogallery.com to an art
> Thanks, everyone.
>
> Luke
>
I have a hunch that some time ago (just before the increased spam via SendGrid
started) there might have been an
unauthorized access to SendGrid customer data which allowed hackers to
bruteforce hashed passwords and use valid
accounts to send spam
hat they are doing with that
> > mail stream, but it doesn't look good.
> >
> > Both of the accounts reported by Michael have been suspended.
> >
> > Thanks, everyone.
> >
> > Luke
> >
> I have a hunch that some time ago (just before the increased spam v
gal under
CAN SPAM.
Perhaps we can collect them all and then sue both Sendgrid and Zoom.
R's,
John
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Like the title asks?
Still seeing it daily in my logs hitting the system filters... Same
source accounts, same general bodies with no unsubscribes, sent through
Zoom's accounts at Sendgrid...
I don't mean to be impatient and all, but it has been a while...
--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open
:
* the headers imply Mailgun instead of SendGrid
* the sending IP was O365, unrelated to Mailgun itself
--
Alex
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Hello,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:00:44AM +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> Any chance SendGrid might amend its ticket system so that there would
> be autoreplies when tickets are created that showed issue numbers
> connected with the original request
It would also be great if
I've instituted short-term blocks of Sendgrid mail several times this year
and started another today because it looks like as much as a third of the
mail they've sent us in the past week has been evil -- mostly phishing.
This is a problem for me because some of the mail Sendgrid sends is
wanted
Am 11.08.20 um 16:53 schrieb Benoit Panizzon via mailop:
> Hi List
>
> o1678912x138.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net [167.89.12.138] and IP under
> control of sendgrid was repeatedly involved in phishing and other spam
> since June.
>
> It ended up being blacklisted @ SWINO
On 6/17/20 1:50 PM, Robert L Mathews via mailop wrote:
> Several months ago I suggested (among other things) that SendGrid block
> "From" headers matching prominent domain names until the messages have
> been manually reviewed. The fact that "don't let random customers send
easonable stretch be put into the same bucket as child
pornography and beheading videos. Trying to make /that/ argument is what
is really irresponsible.
> As someone else already said, Sendgrid is not the government. They
> have every right to decline to sign up undesirable customers.
Yes,
a Smartertools email.
2.) We use SendGrid to email them in the future with newsletters, tools,
and other marketing information.
3.) We just aren't inboxing with Gmail. Never have, despite the customer
opting in.
Questions:
1.) Can anyone recommend a solution?
2.) Should we be integrating SmarterTools
These still seem to be coming in quite consistently... Same Zoom
sendgrid account.
Any updates on whats going on with this, Luke?
On 7/6/21 2:44 PM, Brielle via mailop wrote:
Here's the two that they all share:
Return-path:
Return-path:
(original unmunged version sent directly to you
2.199.144])
> >
> >> Received: from o12.ptr3622.sg.zoom.us (o12.ptr3622.sg.zoom.us
> >> [167.89.93.232])
> >
> > Yes, the mail arrives from systems with rdns of *.sg.zoom.us, but my
> > understanding is that the X-Entity-ID points to a sendgrid us
[167.89.93.232])
Yes, the mail arrives from systems with rdns of *.sg.zoom.us, but my
understanding is that the X-Entity-ID points to a sendgrid user. And the
headers include stuff like:
Received: by filter1889p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id
filter1889p1las1-10585-60DE6FD0-E
2021-07-02 01:45
> Yep, I know you, Sendgrid, told me that you'd be working on it with
> Zoom. And, as expected, nothing ever happened and they still keep
> coming.
About 0.3% of the spams that Koli-Lõks spamtraps got from SendGrid
in December 2021 matched .zoom.us.
It's large enough to be n
So, hey, yeah, Sendgrid and Zoom...
It's still going on even though it was 'being looked into'.
Why do you not respect permanent errors when delivering? My system is
rejecting the mails, so Sendgrid's systems should be marking the mails
as undeliverables and removing the address or flagging
rs to follow up.
Thanks Will for picking up.
Any chance SendGrid might amend its ticket system so that there would
be autoreplies when tickets are created that showed issue numbers
connected with the original request, and/or that any further
correspondence would similarly include anything from the initi
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 02:15:07PM +, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:00:44AM +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> > Any chance SendGrid might amend its ticket system so that there would
> > be autoreplies when tickets are crea
Huh, I'm not seeing that Sendgrid account ID in my traps at all in the
last few days. Different traps for different folks, I guess?
Cheers,
Al
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:06 PM Luke via mailop wrote:
>
> In the Return-Path. "bounces+1234567" the number following bounces+ is
Here's the two that they all share:
Return-path:
Return-path:
(original unmunged version sent directly to you, Luke)
I've got zoom messages via sendgrid being rejected via a system filter
currently, so there should be a bit of bounce messages going back at
Zoom/Sendgrid, but yet they still
Hello,
Ryan Harris, Manager of Compliance with SendGrid here. I wanted to close
the loop on this thread. We spoke with our client Nationbuilder and
informed them that their client was no longer able to send with SendGrid
due to bad practices and violating our ToS. Nationbuilder agreed
ending though a shared range with
Sendgrid. Nothing in their deliverability stack has changed recently. Good
transactional senders and in address books etc. Sendgrid shared IP
(167.89.100.239) being used in the bounces has a good reputation with AOL.
Have not encountered that exact message from AOL befor
Hello Tobi,
Your friendly sendgrid community member here. Could you send me headers off
list? Would love to see what you are experiencing.
Thanks for your help.
Ryan
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, 6:02 AM Tobi via mailop wrote:
> We're currently seeing quite a bunch of messages from
>
On 2020-05-11 14:15, Brielle via mailop wrote:
On 5/11/2020 11:45 AM, Matt V via mailop wrote:
On 2020-05-05 11:09 p.m., Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
I've been told by at least one Sendgrid person that they have
requested membership to the list and are awaiting administrator
approvals
The very first reply to this thread was from a SendGrid representative.
They generally respond pretty quickly any time they are mentioned here.
Luke
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:24 AM Brielle via mailop
wrote:
> On 5/11/2020 11:45 AM, Matt V via mailop wrote:
> > On 2020-05-05 11:09 p
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:25:38PM +0200, Alexander Zeh via mailop wrote:
> > It would also be great if SendGrid would include an abuse reporting
> > URL in the headers of each message, specific to that message, i.e.
> > that passes along all info that S
On 5/5/2020 5:50 PM, Carl Byington via mailop wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 07:48 -0700, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> > This is a little too obvious, and while historically SendGrid ran a
> > tight ship, and got a little lee way from spam auditors.. it's getting
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 15:06 -0700, Jay Hennigan via mailop wrote:
> On 5/5/20 14:30, Blake Hudson via mailop wrote:
> > Been getting a variety of Amex scams for several weeks via SendGrid.
> > Wish they had a better repo
Hello Steve,
I'm seeing a very significant drop off of sendgrid-originated spam. Couple
of minor phish/419 in the past 24 hours.
Anybody else?
I don't see any drop in volumes here. I just spent 10 minutes looking at
anything hitting traps today from Sendgrid ASN and soon found plenty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 12:03 +, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> From: "chiark.greenend.org.uk"
So sendgrid account 15204622 was sending mail as:
Received: from dhl.com (unknown)
by ismtpd0005p1lon1.sendgrid.net (SG)
, 2020-08-18 at 15:23 +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
Where do you find that account number in the headers? I see some from
today with "Upgrade (FINAL WARNING)" in the subject, but no indication
of any sendgrid acco
Atro, what was Y axis? Individual emails? 10's? 100's?
And you just seemed to say that it was all sendgrid, not taking into
account whether it was spam or not. Correct?
Um.
On 2020-05-21 05:01, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
Hey Ray,
I checked again this morning and its 'back
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 08:55 -0500, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:00:35 +0100, Tim Bray via mailop w
> rote:
> > Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look fairly
> > convincing.
>
> General spam (several per week) and p
> Il 23/12/2020 13:13 Laura Atkins via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
>
> The discussion is simpler than that. Sendgrid owns their network.
> Sendgrid gets to make the rules about what is allowed on their network.
>
> Spam isn’t illegal, yet they prohibit it.
&
from Sendgrid, is bulk unsolicited email. Sendgrid
are spammers. It doesn't matter whether they spam encouraging or
discouraging COVID vaccination, it's still spam.
--
Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
ery subjective opinion - against
> another' subjective opinion - about the content. So I 100% strongly
> disagree with this opinion that Sendgrid should be the political
> "thought police" for LEGAL content that is sent from their platform.
I've never understood this line of thinking. Se
Sendgrid who perform the filtering this approach has the effect of putting a
content filter on the abuse mailbox.
You're assuming that Sendgrid actually cares about or reads abuse
complaints in the first place. The spam is a steady flow, nothing new.
In Sendgrid's case, filtering abuse complaints
If you could share the return-path of the offending message, I can have it
looked at.
Cheers,
Luke
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 11:39 AM Brielle via mailop
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone here have a contact for Zoom in re of webinar spam being sent
> from their platform via Sendgrid owned
is somewhat expected to receive
>> problematic content to a service that tries to keep
>> such content out of their users' mailboxes doesn't really look very
>> professional, and even if it isn't technically
>> Sendgrid who perform the filtering this approach has the effect
On 12/02/2021 04:26, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:49, Rob McEwen via mailop
He's not even trying to let people guess Sendgrid is good at preventing
abuses.
Why would he? because they are not good at it, sendgrid are blocked
here, have been for w months
ING to do the right thing - but -
> considering what is coming FROM SendGrid in recent years, is this the right
> time to be giving OTHERS anti-abuse/security advice? Just... wow! I think
> they should instead consider trying to "lead by example". The world would
> certa
I'm in a good mood this morning.
Going through my logs and rspamd console, still seeing webinar spams via
abused Zoom sendgrid account.
Yeah, the same ones from last year that I keep reporting. And the same
ones with no unsubscribe, or any kind of footers to allow for reporting
as abuse
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 2:21 PM Michael Orlitzky via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> In the past few months there have been several threads on mailop and
> similar lists (sdlu, spamassassin-users, nanog, ...) complaining about
> how SendGrid doesn't seem to do anything
==
These correspond to the SendGrid user IDs
Return-Path: Here's the two that they all share:
>
> Return-path:
> Return-path:
>
> (original unmunged version sent directly to you, Luke)
>
> I've got zoom messages via sendgrid being rejected via a system
> filter currently,
act for Zoom webinar spam sent via Sendgrid
> (ugh)
> Message-ID: <737bf486-f945-c64b-a7ef-9575e1f6d...@2mbit.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> These still seem to be coming in quite consistently... Same Zoom
> sendgrid acc
On 09/01/2022 13:44, Brie via mailop wrote:
Hi Sendgrid and Zoom,
We've been over this before, multiple times... But alas, it looks like
that you neither of you seem to care a single bit about your services
being used to send spams that can't be unsubscribed from.
Yep, I know you
nsfer-Encoding: binary
boundary belongs to Content-Type.
This will cause problems with any message parsing application that
expects proper mime structure.
Anyone else seeing such broken headers from sendgrid?
--
tobi
___
mailop mailing list
m
In article <545fde17-9db1-4f90-a253-0eed52057...@graemef.net> you write:
>That looks remarkably like Sendgrid use ZenDesk for their abuse desk platform,
>and they’re replying to or otherwise acknowledging your
>ticket. That they include the original email body isn’t that surprising
Hi!
On Tue Dec 24 16:43:39 GMT 2019 Kevin A. McGrail wrote
> We've been seeing the same over the past few weeks as a growing threat.
> They are abusing sendgrid and the SPF records and the envelope from to
> mimic some big players.
When I report spam to ab...@sendgrid.com
on Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:45:42PM -0400, Matt V via mailop wrote:
> On 2020-05-05 11:09 p.m., Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
>
> I've been told by at least one Sendgrid person that they have
> requested membership to the list and are awaiting administrator
> approvals...
Yep, appar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 07:48 -0700, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> This is a little too obvious, and while historically SendGrid ran a
> tight ship, and got a little lee way from spam auditors.. it's getting
> very bad, and going o
Hai!
I don't see any drop in volumes here. I just spent 10 minutes
looking at anything hitting traps today from Sendgrid ASN and soon
found plenty of concern:
I concur with Steve.
http://www.atro.fi/sendgrid.png
Y axis is linear, thin line is trendline.
Thanks Atro!
I checked again
On 10/5/20 6:02 PM, Eric Tykwinski via mailop wrote:
> I’m not sure about SendGrid per say, but Twilio is mainly an API provider, so
> full OAUTH, private keys, et al, as I’m a customer of their SMS, phone
> service, et al.
> As far as I know SendGrid is the same, but not saying
1 - 100 of 540 matches
Mail list logo
