I'm not sure what is relevant to this inquiry,
but my web pages related to Husserl and phenomenology are:
http://www.autodidactproject.org/other/farber7.htmlExperience
and Subjectivism (Sections I.F-II.D) by Marvin Farber
http://www.autodidactproject.org/other/farber1.htmlThe
Issue of
that he was closer to Popper than
A.J. Ayer.
Paddy Hackett
- Original Message -
From: Jim Farmelant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 2:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc
Hi
Given that Bertrand Russell rejected verificationism as the criterion as to
what is science, can you tell me what was his criterion or criteria for
identifying science as against non-science was?
Paddy Hackett
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
On Vygotsky:
http://www.mail-archive.com/marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu/msg01947.html
-- CeJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JF:
I am interested in them because of my general interest
in the philosophy of science and the broader implications:
culturally, socially and politically of differing
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph
Dumain
Sent: 03 April 2008 05:08
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
I wonder if this is unequivocally true about the Frankfurters. For
sure, Adorno
Sent: 03 April 2008 05:08
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
I wonder if this is unequivocally true about the Frankfurters. For
sure, Adorno, Horkheimer, and Marcuse had an animus against
positivism, but it is not necessarily the case
, April 03, 2008 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:53:37 +0100 rasherrs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Thank you for the help in relation to the Vienna Circle. It is a
circle
that has been much misunderstood in radical left circles. When I was
in my
late
03, 2008 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:53:37 +0100 rasherrs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Thank you for the help in relation to the Vienna Circle. It is a
circle
that has been much misunderstood in radical left circles. When I was
in my
late
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph
Dumain
Sent: 03 April 2008 08:45
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
Bad grammar aside, I thought my point was non-mysterious. If, after
I've given a detailed argument as to why some philosophy is false
Ralph Dumain
I would like to point out for the general purpose of such
discussions, I am not terribly impressed to show a favorable attitude
towards philosophies just because some of their proponents were
political progressive individuals. This shows a rather provincial
approach to
Sent: 03 April 2008 05:08
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
I wonder if this is unequivocally true about the Frankfurters. For
sure, Adorno, Horkheimer, and Marcuse had an animus against
positivism, but it is not necessarily the case
-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
I am interested in them because of my general interest
in the philosophy of science and the broader implications:
culturally, socially and politically of differing
supported the breakaway Social Democratic
Party.
Paddy Hackett
--
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
I am interested in them
JF:
I am interested in them because of my general interest
in the philosophy of science and the broader implications:
culturally, socially and politically of differing
philosophies of science. Concerning the Vienna Circle,
I am in agreement with George Reisch that because of
the peculiarities of
(and was down officially as an opponent of the logical positivists),
they published at least of his books, didn't they?
I meant to say here that the VC published at least TWO of Popper's books.
CJ
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
PROTECTED]
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Cc: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
Interesting. I wonder if I should put this or similar items into my
bibliography. This is a Marxist advocating
I wonder if this is unequivocally true about the Frankfurters. For
sure, Adorno, Horkheimer, and Marcuse had an animus against
positivism, but it is not necessarily the case that they viewed the
neopositivists themselves as reactionaries. The closest approach to
specific animosity I can
Popper at one time had wanted to join the Circle and was evidently
very envious of the admiration Wittgenstein received from them (though
by most accounts, Wittgenstein did not see himself as engaged in their
scientific world view and did not encourage their acclaim of him).
Here is a nice
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:19:46 +0900 CeJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Popper at one time had wanted to join the Circle and was evidently
very envious of the admiration Wittgenstein received from them
(though
by most accounts, Wittgenstein did not see himself as engaged in
their
scientific
The VC didn't include Husserl in their manifesto, but I think he
represents an important alternative in this discussion, if we want to
reconcile 'human' and natural sciences.
See, for example,
http://pos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/27/3/328
Husserl, Weber, Freud, and the Method of the
Also worth of consideration are Piaget's discussions on the philosophy
of science (especially its turn to 'sociology of knowledge'
post-Kuhn). This article (which I managed to get online for free
somewhere, but I can now only find the abstract for) has been
influential in pushing forward a
Interesting. I wonder if I should put this or similar items into my
bibliography. This is a Marxist advocating the Popperian approach as
a way of circumventing doctrinal rigidification. Can you think of
other Marxists who have taken this road?
At 07:41 PM 4/1/2008, Jim Farmelant wrote:
On
This must be the document I downloaded earlier today. It was linked
from the Wikipedia article on the Vienna Circle, if I recall
correctly. It is rather confusing in its structure. Someone should
check the print source to see if the whole manifesto is here included.
I always remember this
23 matches
Mail list logo
