On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 14:04 +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
He probably mean MS Mail, an ancient Microsoft mail system
that no sane person should be running in 2007.
Regardless, if NOOP is in the SMTP standard, and spamd does not handle
it correctly, that is a bug that needs to be fixed.
--
Shawn
hi all,
i found it interesting that cat.c compiles after removing these
includes:
#include ctype.h
#include err.h
#include errno.h
#include string.h
#include unistd.h
im just curious to hear opinions and learn something ;)
--
Hiren Patel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi !
Maybe this is newbie question, but i cant find answer.
I try to make redirection, the destination server is not in Lan, but in
public Internet.
Public Internet Router/PF with
real IP Server with real IP in Public Internet
http://flirble.disruptiveproactivity.com/rss/
/Markus
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
The latest entry in
http://www.vuxml.org/openbsd/
is
2006-01-10 clamav -- heap overflow in the UPX code
more than a year now?
is there any other place to get updated RSS feed for the same thing?
Thankyou
Dear list members,
how could i adjust my mbuf size? Need i to compile a news kernel ?
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 14:04 +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
He probably mean MS Mail, an ancient Microsoft mail system
that no sane person should be running in 2007.
Regardless, if NOOP is in the SMTP standard, and spamd does not handle
it correctly, that
SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Free as in FreeBSD (and NetBSD and DragonFly BSD etc.).
War is peace, freedom is freebsd...
//art
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 05:56:04PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-18 16:16]:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 08:57:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/03/18 16:35, Peter wrote:
On OpenBSD 4.0, how do I specify what port spamlogd should consider
Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 3/18/07, Sid Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
greylisting. On further investigation, we found out that the MS Mail
servers send a NOOP before they start sending other SMTP commands and
spamd returns a 451 even for a NOOP causing the SMTP connection to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/18/2007 02:22:39 PM:
I'm running an OpenBSD 4.0 system (generic kernel), fitted with an
Adaptec
29160 SCSI card (so using the ahc driver), with the intention of running
an
external 3Tb RAID5 array (a Nexsan ATAboy). The intention is to setup a
variety of
On 3/19/07, hiren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i found it interesting that cat.c compiles after removing these
includes:
#include ctype.h
#include err.h
#include errno.h
#include string.h
#include unistd.h
im just curious to hear opinions and learn something ;)
Have you tried to run it
* SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 03:21]:
Free as in FreeBSD
ahh, I finally get it.
dry like water
hot like ice
free like freebsd
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated
#dmesg
OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC) #1: Mon Mar 19 00:36:34 PHT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (GenuineIntel
686-class) 1.50 GHz
cpu0:
Hello,
In the changelog from 4.0 to 4.1, I read:
# In pf.conf(5), make 'flags S/SA keep state' the implicit default for
filter rules.
Does this only apply to tcp (as suggested by the flags) or to all
protocols? Also, is there a way to specify that there should be no state
kept?
I am trying to
On 2007/03/19 12:09, Renaud Allard wrote:
In the changelog from 4.0 to 4.1, I read:
# In pf.conf(5), make 'flags S/SA keep state' the implicit default for
filter rules.
Does this only apply to tcp (as suggested by the flags) or to all
protocols?
you can see for yourself with pfctl -vf
Renaud Allard wrote:
Hello,
In the changelog from 4.0 to 4.1, I read:
# In pf.conf(5), make 'flags S/SA keep state' the implicit default for
filter rules.
Does this only apply to tcp (as suggested by the flags) or to all
protocols? Also, is there a way to specify that there should be no
* Renaud Allard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 12:22]:
In the changelog from 4.0 to 4.1, I read:
# In pf.conf(5), make 'flags S/SA keep state' the implicit default for
filter rules.
Does this only apply to tcp (as suggested by the flags) or to all
protocols?
all protocols.
flags only apply
Renaud Allard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to make pptp VPN pass through my nat firewall, it worked
great with 3.9 and is not working anymore with 4.1. I know that when I
put a keep state for GRE protocol it didn't work and without the keep
state it worked, but that may be unrelated.
Hi,
Can anybody tell me, what configuration options openNTPD supports?
Does it support anything additional to the documentations of ntpd and
ntpd.conf on openntpd.org?
especially im interested in the option peer known with NTPD.
Thanks and regards,
Lorenz
Artur Grabowski wrote:
SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Free as in FreeBSD (and NetBSD and DragonFly BSD etc.).
War is peace, freedom is freebsd...
freedom is regime change, war is profit.
//art
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:14:00AM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrote:
On 3/19/07, hiren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i found it interesting that cat.c compiles after removing these
includes:
#include ctype.h
#include err.h
#include errno.h
#include string.h
#include unistd.h
im just
On 3/19/07, hiren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i found it interesting that cat.c compiles after removing these
includes:
#include ctype.h
#include err.h
#include errno.h
#include string.h
#include unistd.h
im just curious to hear opinions and learn something ;)
That's probably because
Hello,
I am using an OpenBSD 4.0 box connected to a 2Mbit SDSL line in
Germany (using user space PPP).
When pinging a host across the SDSL line, I get an occasional
sendto: No buffer space available message:
64 bytes from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: icmp_seq=566 ttl=254 time=62.674 ms
64 bytes from
On 3/19/07, Rafael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/19/07, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.genesis.com.hk/
Uh, doesn't look like they're selling OpenBSD reallly...
Nonetheless when I enter the site my account was created and I could
access my website right away using
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:36:00PM -0500, R. Fumione wrote:
Hello,
I am using OpenBSD on server since few years now, and I am very happy
with it's easy maintenance and it's stability. I want to try on
desktop, and I am
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:31:14PM +0200, Marius ROMAN wrote:
Programming documentation is restricted also because the hardware is
full of bugs and like Theo said there is no errata for a lot of
hardware.
On the other hand, some vendors go as far as releasing even the schematics and
gerbers
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Nick ! wrote:
On 3/19/07, hiren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i found it interesting that cat.c compiles after removing these
includes:
#include ctype.h
#include err.h
#include errno.h
#include string.h
#include unistd.h
im just curious to hear
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:38:02AM +0800, ronald jiang wrote:
I want to compiling firefox in obsd4.0.
I've installed obsd fully.
What else do I need to compile firefox?
If you want to compile and not install from binary, read about the ports
on openbsd.org faq page I think it's section 5. Be
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:34:52PM -0800, zion wrote:
Hello list,
Having serious problems with Sony PCG-V505EX laptop.
Basically, sound doesn't work unless there is some activity (traffic) on
fxp0 or iwi0 interfaces. Even if there is some traffic, sound grinds to
a halt after few seconds.
On Monday 19 March 2007 6:51:37 am Jay Jesus Amorin wrote:
iwi0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:12:f0:c7:30:a9
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect
status: no network
ieee80211: nwid my_net nwkey 0x1deadbeef1 -50dBm
inet 192.168.1.1
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:36:00PM -0500, R. Fumione wrote:
Hello,
I am using OpenBSD on server since few years now, and I am very happy
with it's easy maintenance and it's stability. I want to try on
desktop, and I am
snip
Everything is much slower than existing Linux system. For example,
Firefox takes 3-5 seconds to start on Linux but ~10 seconds on
OpenBSD on same machine!
I have the same problem. The FFS doesn't seem to be as fast as ext2.
The issue is not filesystem speed, but rather prelinking
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:23:28PM +0100, Vim Visual wrote:
Agreed. It's not the lawsuit that makes people use Linux instead of the
BSD's; it's the holier-than-thou,
fuck-'em-if-they-dare-question-our-judgement attitude.
Jeff
indeed...
actually, I was curious to see what answers
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:43:27AM +0100, Alexander Farber wrote:
FYI (sorry if this already been mentioned here):
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/03/prweb509818.htm
In order to use the firmware provided by Intel, FreeBSD users must
first agree with the license. FreeBSD developers have
On 3/19/07, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear list members,
how could i adjust my mbuf size? Need i to compile a news kernel ?
kern.maxclusters allows setting new limits for mbufs.
This would supposedly go out with the same tuning warnings as usual;
you may find you need a very
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 13:53:00 +0100:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:36:00PM -0500, R. Fumione wrote:
(...)
I would like to point out here that the idea of optimization is
Hi Lorenz,
Can anybody tell me, what configuration options openNTPD supports?
First guess:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ntpd.confsektion=5arch=i386apropos=0manpath=OpenBSD+Current
For the latest and greatest.
Normally, around here the mantra is something like If it's not in
daniele.pilenga wrote:
First, those SCSIFORCELUN* options are no longer used in 4.0... this cost
me a few days to figure out! :-\
I did wonder about that; those options are missing from the manpage, but
used to be there...
All I was able to do was make my server see the first lun, but not the
I have the same problem. The FFS doesn't seem to be as fast as ext2.
Since OpenBSD sucks so hard it might be time to upgrade to something
much more feature rich. I suggest Linux or OSX or Vista.
Suggesting things is fun!
Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
TIA
John
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:36:00PM -0500, R. Fumione wrote:
Hello,
I am using OpenBSD on server since few years now, and I am very happy
with it's easy maintenance and it's stability. I want to try on
desktop, and I am having trouble.
Everything is much slower than
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:35:14AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 03:21]:
Free as in FreeBSD
ahh, I finally get it.
dry like water
hot like ice
free like freebsd
FreeBSD is released under BSD licence and therefore is free software, see
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether the
result of optimization is correct. Therefore it's not the optimizations that
are source of bugs, but bugs in GCC.
But if you write a program and the user
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:36:00PM -0500, R. Fumione wrote:
Hello,
I am using OpenBSD on server since few years now, and I am very happy
with it's easy maintenance and it's stability. I want to try on
desktop, and I am having trouble.
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:36:00PM -0500, R. Fumione wrote:
Hello,
I am using OpenBSD on server since few years now, and I am very happy
with it's easy maintenance and it's stability. I want to try on
desktop,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:06:31AM +0100, SW wrote:
I have a feeling that the campaign means We don't want vendors to require
us to use a blob but we'll ocassionally use them when we have to other way,
while Theo means I don't want vendors to require us to use a blob and I refuse
to use them even
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:38:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
So isn't it rather hypocritical to have a anti-Blob campaign, backed
by projects which embrace the Blob?
So isn't it rather hypocritical to claim GPL license is bad and BSD
license is good and ship operating system with GPLed code?
Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether the
result of optimization is correct. Therefore it's not the optimizations that
are source of bugs, but bugs in GCC.
Good thing we're not just programmers, but actually
Not if he makes his saving throw! I bet you he has a cloak of infinite
karma too. So not hit-points lost!
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:57:58AM +, Jason George wrote:
Hi,
this is the conversation I had with Theo:
You just made private emails public, almost certainly without the
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:23:43AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether the
result of optimization is correct. Therefore it's not the optimizations that
are
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:26:56AM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
Aggressive compiler optimizations are not generally a good idea. The
developers believe they are an unnecessary
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:40:02PM +0100, Walter Doerr wrote:
Hello,
I am using an OpenBSD 4.0 box connected to a 2Mbit SDSL line in
Germany (using user space PPP).
When pinging a host across the SDSL line, I get an occasional
sendto: No buffer space available message:
64 bytes from
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:41:06AM -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:
On 3/19/07, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear list members,
how could i adjust my mbuf size? Need i to compile a news kernel ?
kern.maxclusters allows setting new limits for mbufs.
this will set a new limit for
Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:35:14AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 03:21]:
Free as in FreeBSD
ahh, I finally get it.
dry like water
hot like ice
free like freebsd
FreeBSD is released under BSD licence
Jason George wrote:
This was sabre-rattling. Daniel made a pre-emptive tactical strike.
There's a big difference.
No, there's not a difference. Theo said he was willing to take the
emails public; this Daniel guy took him at his word, and made them
public. The only foul I see is Theo
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:06:31AM +0100, SW wrote:
I have a feeling that the campaign means We don't want vendors to require
us to use a blob but we'll ocassionally use them when we have to other way,
while Theo means I don't want vendors to require us to use a blob and
I thought it was free as in beer, but because of the blobs, not
necessarily free as in you can do whatever you want with it...
Because what can you do with a blob? Are you allowed to use a blob
anywhere you want, in any situation? Are you allowed to crack open a
blob and use parts of its code to
JOHN LUCKEY wrote:
Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
It isn't different from any UNIX system with BIND. So just google for
the words dns howto, links to
* Sid Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 03:25]:
Regardless, if NOOP is in the SMTP standard, and spamd does not handle
it correctly, that is a bug that needs to be fixed.
Bullshit. that's not a good enough reason - spamd does not
implement all of smtp, and never will. saying it's
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:06:31AM +0100, SW wrote:
I have a feeling that the campaign means We don't want vendors to require
us to use a blob but we'll ocassionally use them when we have to other way,
while Theo means I don't want vendors to
Really?
I have a completely different experience: I never managed to completely loose
a filesystem, except by on OpenBSD...
I've been using slackware linux on reiserfs and xfs for many years now, on my
home PCs and company laptop (so, no real production environment) and I'm
happy with both their
You are so uninformed that it isn't even funny to pick on you.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:04:46PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:06:31AM +0100, SW wrote:
I have a feeling that the campaign means We don't want vendors to require
us to use a blob but we'll ocassionally
On 03/19/07 at 7:33, JOHN LUCKEY wrote:
Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/dns/index.html
JOHN LUCKEY wrote:
Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
bind is part of the base system @ OpenBSD (default install).
These manuals should help.
man named
Hey Michael,
I use OpenBSD from 3.6, when every release is pre-ordered, i can't find a
easy way to
own a set.
I live in China, Is it possible to have a OpenBSD store in Asia?
China? Japan? Korean? or other coutries?
Did you contact http://www.genesis.com.hk/ in Hong Kong?
Or should we
Hi,
FreeBSD sysctl supports hw.snd.pcm0.vchans and hw.snd.maxautovchans.
With this variables user may hear sound from many apps at one time.
How I can do this in OpenBSD.
My friend says that this possible only when current app link with
lossaudio(3). Maybe there is another way?
Sorry for my
** Reply to message from Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19
Mar 2007 15:04:46 +0100
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:06:31AM +0100, SW wrote:
I have a feeling that the campaign means We don't want vendors to require
us to use a blob but we'll ocassionally use them when we have to other way,
On 3/19/07, JOHN LUCKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
TIA
John
an unofficial source, but it was very usefull to me..
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have also a feeling that deleting huge files or large directories with
loads of tiny files in subdirectories is slower.
A feeling?? Entirely subjective readings like this mean nothing and
are at best noise and at worst FUD. Come on, be
If you like losing data ext3 and reiserfs work just fine. I manage to
lose Linux installations pretty often by doing crazy things like
rebooting.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:41:05PM +0100, RedShift wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:42:26PM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
JOHN LUCKEY wrote:
Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
It isn't different from any
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:23:43AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether the
result of optimization is correct. Therefore it's not the optimizations that
are
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:26:56AM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
Aggressive compiler optimizations are not generally a good idea.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Wilson wrote:
I dunno. Am I being overly paranoid, or should I stick with nice
dependable old-fashioned malloc?
I usually take dependable and slightly slower over faster and nastier
any day. Especially if it's fast enough.
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:38:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
So isn't it rather hypocritical to have a anti-Blob campaign, backed
by projects which embrace the Blob?
So isn't it rather hypocritical to claim GPL license is bad and BSD
license is good and
In epistula a Manuel Ravasio [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon,
19 Mar 2007 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT):
Really?
I have a completely different experience: I never managed to
completely loose a filesystem, except by on OpenBSD...
I've been using slackware linux on reiserfs and xfs for many years
Sorry, I've asked this before and didn't get a response.. am I asking
this incorrectly - or in the wrong place?
Hello all,
I'm trying to get a mini pci card working on OpenBSD 4.0. I ripped this
card out of a dlink router that we weren't using. From what I understand
it's supposed to use the
In epistula a Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 10:54:24 -0500:
Jason George wrote:
This was sabre-rattling. Daniel made a pre-emptive tactical strike.
There's a big difference.
No, there's not a difference. Theo said he was willing to take the
emails
Jason George wrote:
This was sabre-rattling. Daniel made a pre-emptive tactical strike.
There's a big difference.
No, there's not a difference. Theo said he was willing to take the
emails public; this Daniel guy took him at his word, and made them
public. The only foul I see is Theo
Sorry, I've asked this before and didn't get a response.. am I asking
this incorrectly - or in the wrong place?
Hello all,
I'm trying to get a mini pci card working on OpenBSD 4.0. I ripped this
card out of a dlink router that we weren't using. From what I understand
it's supposed to use the
Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:23:43AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether
the
result of optimization is correct.
In epistula a Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 15:02:47 +0100:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:38:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
So isn't it rather hypocritical to have a anti-Blob campaign, backed
by projects which embrace the Blob?
So isn't it rather
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:33:42AM -0700, JOHN LUCKEY wrote:
Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
Sure, I have that exact setup running. I've pasted a
Hi Pawel,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek schrieb am Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:02:47PM +0100:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:38:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
So isn't it rather hypocritical to have a anti-Blob campaign, backed
by projects which embrace the Blob?
So isn't it rather hypocritical to claim
JOHN LUCKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
Assuming that you don't need dynamic updates, Dan Bernstein has EXACT
guidelines for his djbdns:
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html
Look for How to
Marco Peereboom wrote:
If you like losing data ext3 and reiserfs work just fine. I manage to
lose Linux installations pretty often by doing crazy things like
rebooting.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:41:05PM +0100, RedShift wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100,
It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether
the
result of optimization is correct. Therefore it's not the optimizations
that
are source of bugs, but bugs in GCC.
But if you write a program and the user finds it full of bugs, are they
going to care that
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 15:59:06 +0100:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:15:16AM -0400, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
snip
Everything is much slower than existing Linux system. For
example, Firefox takes 3-5 seconds to start on Linux but ~10
Might be a dumb question, but what's the equivalent of
neighbor ip address remove-private-as
in OpenBGPD
I've just noticed we're advertising prefixes 65xxx to our upstream
providers when we should be stripping them from our advertisements.
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 15:27:29 +0100:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:35:14AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 03:21]:
Free as in FreeBSD
ahh, I finally get it.
dry like water
hot like ice
free like
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 16:00:49 +0100:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:26:56AM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
Aggressive compiler
Yeah but what die is he rolling? I'm tired of rolling a six-sided die
against blobs and hobgoblins when all the level 23 developer-clerics are
using a 20-sided die... simply not fair!!!
danno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Marco
On 2007/03/19 11:14, Steve Glaus wrote:
I'm trying to get a mini pci card working on OpenBSD 4.0. I ripped this
card out of a dlink router that we weren't using. From what I understand
it's supposed to use the acx driver.
Knowing that minipci can be fiddly, I would double-check it's
inserted
Are you looking to make the DNS server a caching-only DNS server or are
you going to have be authoritative for a domain (or set of domains?) (If
you don't know the answer to this question then any 'examples' are going
to be lost on the ignorant... no offense, you should understand this
before
Tobias Weingartner wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Wilson wrote:
I dunno. Am I being overly paranoid, or should I stick with nice
dependable old-fashioned malloc?
I usually take dependable and slightly slower over faster and nastier
any day. Especially if it's fast enough.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 04:19:11PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
We can analogically use this argument for ocassional errors in memory, too. If
We can, but we won't.
Yes, the GCC bugs should be fixed. Yes, it's important to communicate
with the GCC people that -O2 breaks things sometimes.
This
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Nick ! wrote:
On 3/19/07, hiren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i found it interesting that cat.c compiles after removing these
includes:
#include ctype.h
#include err.h
#include
Ok,
Here is my output of netstat:
$ netstat -m
331 mbufs in use:
326 mbufs allocated to data
2 mbufs allocated to packet headers
3 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses
72/152/6144 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
420 Kbytes allocated to network (53% in use)
0
On 3/19/07, mail-lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I've asked this before and didn't get a response.. am I asking
this incorrectly - or in the wrong place?
This is the right place, you just haven't done your research so no one
bothered to answer. You might want to look into
[EMAIL
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
What about Charlie Root testing something remotely through cron and then
Ok, I'll bite. This is not hard. Here's something I did real quick.
Use at your own risk. Replace XXX with your closest ftp mirror from
http://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html.
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
