Re: opensmtpd: sendmail: command failed: 421 4.3.0: Temporary Error

Hi again, Mystery solved. According to /var/log/maillog, it was because the system only had 3% storage left. Yours sincerely, Xianwen On 10/18/19, Xianwen Chen (陈贤文) wrote: > Hi, > > I was able to sendmail correctly until a couple of hours ago. > > In the past couple of hours, I

opensmtpd: sendmail: command failed: 421 4.3.0: Temporary Error

Hi, I was able to sendmail correctly until a couple of hours ago. In the past couple of hours, I was installing and setting up mu4e. mu / mu4e is set to read directly ~/Maildir. I did not change any setting in /etc but did manually edit /etc/passwd. Here is the setting of /etc/mail/smtpd.conf

Re: Migrate Mailserver from sendmail/Curier/LDAP to OpenSMTP/Dovecot/LDAP

Hi Craig, I will check it out, for now Im glad about the input I got here from all of you :) The list ist in a lot of cases the right place to get help! For me its hard to battle with some of these things because its not my main focus. In the end I try to write some code in c# or python. But

Re: Migrate Mailserver from sendmail/Curier/LDAP to OpenSMTP/Dovecot/LDAP

Hi Markus, On 2017-01-27 Fri 12:24 PM |, Markus Rosjat wrote: > I dont like the idea of one single virtual user handling all the traffic to > the maildirectories. Me neither. Here, all users have proper shell accounts & SSH access, for mutt, etc. Stop Dovecot, unmount /var/mail (where mail

Re: Migrate Mailserver from sendmail/Curier/LDAP to OpenSMTP/Dovecot/LDAP

On 2017-01-27, Markus Rosjat wrote: > Hi Kim, > > I dont like the idea of one single virtual user handling all the traffic > to the maildirectories. I did read about it but it feels strange to me. It makes things a lot simpler in some cases (e.g. if you share some folders

Re: Migrate Mailserver from sendmail/Curier/LDAP to OpenSMTP/Dovecot/LDAP

Hello, ros...@ghweb.de (Markus Rosjat), 2017.01.27 (Fri) 09:44 (CET): > so my question is what is the best strategy to migrate an exsiting LDAP > directory from a system that has sendmail and courier running to a system > with openSMTP and Dovecot. > > Old system: > >

Re: Migrate Mailserver from sendmail/Curier/LDAP to OpenSMTP/Dovecot/LDAP

10:48 schrieb Kim Zeitler: Hi Markus On 01/27/17 09:44, Markus Rosjat wrote: Hi there, so my question is what is the best strategy to migrate an exsiting LDAP directory from a system that has sendmail and courier running to a system with openSMTP and Dovecot. Couple of years ago we changed from

Re: Migrate Mailserver from sendmail/Curier/LDAP to OpenSMTP/Dovecot/LDAP

Hi Markus On 01/27/17 09:44, Markus Rosjat wrote: > Hi there, > > so my question is what is the best strategy to migrate an exsiting LDAP > directory from a system that has sendmail and courier running to a > system with openSMTP and Dovecot. > Couple of years ago we ch

Migrate Mailserver from sendmail/Curier/LDAP to OpenSMTP/Dovecot/LDAP

Hi there, so my question is what is the best strategy to migrate an exsiting LDAP directory from a system that has sendmail and courier running to a system with openSMTP and Dovecot. Old system: - Has systemaccount that match LDAP account - system accounts to handle access to the filesystem

Re: Sendmail on OpenBSD 6.0

mail not wanted > hereViews & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present > employer Saw your message in the OpenSMTPd list about having problems with sendmail. I am not using sendmail on 6.0 at the moment but used it last year following all the instructions within /usr/

Sendmail on OpenBSD 6.0

Is anybody using this configuration, i.e. not OpenSMTPD? Regards - Damian Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037 Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present

[solved] sendmail mx question

on my end. Regards Am 06.04.2016 um 16:25 schrieb Craig Skinner: Hi Markus, On 2016-04-06 Wed 09:29 AM |, Markus Rosjat wrote: Okay with some help from Christoph Viethen I did some testing and connfirmed a few things - sendmail -bt gave me the right order of the mx to talk to - I couldn

Re: sendmail mx question

On 2016-04-06 Wed 09:29 AM |, Markus Rosjat wrote: Okay with some help from Christoph Viethen I did some testing and connfirmed a few things - sendmail -bt gave me the right order of the mx to talk to - I couldn't connect to the server with nc - I couldn't ping the server - nslookup gave me the

Re: sendmail mx question

Hi Markus, On 2016-04-06 Wed 09:29 AM |, Markus Rosjat wrote: > Okay with some help from Christoph Viethen I did some testing and connfirmed > a few things > > - sendmail -bt gave me the right order of the mx to talk to > - I couldn't connect to the server with nc > - I couldn

Re: sendmail mx question

Okay with some help from Christoph Viethen I did some testing and connfirmed a few things - sendmail -bt gave me the right order of the mx to talk to - I couldn't connect to the server with nc - I couldn't ping the server - nslookup gave me the correct IP to the server what really confuses me

Re: sendmail mx question

> so the real smtp has the lower number but higher priority but like I said my > sendmail always ends up with shit.example.not.nz. What does "sendmail always ends up with shit.example.not.nz." mean? Of course sendmail tries the secondary MX after trying the main MX. Still n

Re: sendmail mx question

> > so the real smtp has the lower number but higher priority but like I said my > sendmail always ends up with shit.example.not.nz. > Can you ping & connect to their primary MX? $ nc smtp.example.not.nz 25 It could be a routing or packet filtering fault somewhere. Cheers. --

Re: sendmail mx question

hi there, no the real setup is the other way arround 1 shit.example.not.nz. 10 # <<--- always defering server 2 smtp.example.not.nz. 5 # <<--- real server so the real smtp has the lower number but higher priority but like I said my sendmail always ends up with shit.ex

Re: sendmail mx question

your server tries again > later!!! It has no need to try the backup MX machine, it got told to try Really? Which MTA does that? sendmail 8.x? Well, it would be nice if the OP provides some real info, but since he didn't do that, I didn't reply...

Re: sendmail mx question

Hi Markus, On 2016-04-05 Tue 14:22 PM |, Markus Rosjat wrote: > > yeah my server does retries but always ends up on the mailserver with the > lower priority :( > That is the correct behaviour. Without the domain name, I'm guessing with English words what you mean;- Pretending their broken

Re: sendmail mx question

is spamd(8), but stil l) So far so good the priority on the 2nd mx is also lower so my sendmail daemon should figure to send to the server with the highest priority but it does not. So here is what I have done to get my server to try to deliver the mail to the right server: - restarted sendmail

Re: sendmail mx question

nce right there. If it's an MX, it needs to actually handle mail. (Ok, there is the slightly perverse case where the only thing actually listening on port 25 is spamd(8), but stil l) > So far so good the priority on the 2nd mx is also lower so my > sendmail daemon should figure to sen

sendmail mx question

on the 2nd mx is also lower so my sendmail daemon should figure to send to the server with the highest priority but it does not. So here is what I have done to get my server to try to deliver the mail to the right server: - restarted sendmail - restarted named Is there something I can do still

Re: OpenBSD 5.7 Asterisk sendmail voice mail as email

On 2015-05-28, Peter Fraser p...@thinkage.ca wrote: Asterisk seems to run fine on 5.7 with one exception. I normally have voice mail messages send as emails. These emails are not being send. It's fixed in -current, for 5.7 try adding this to modules.conf and restarting asterisk: noload =

Re: OpenBSD 5.7 Asterisk sendmail voice mail as email

On 2015-05-29, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2015-05-28, Peter Fraser p...@thinkage.ca wrote: Asterisk seems to run fine on 5.7 with one exception. I normally have voice mail messages send as emails. These emails are not being send. It's fixed in -current, for 5.7 try

OpenBSD 5.7 Asterisk sendmail voice mail as email

Asterisk seems to run fine on 5.7 with one exception. I normally have voice mail messages send as emails. These emails are not being send. /usr/local/share/examples/asterisk/default/voicemail.conf has a variable ;mailcmd=/usr/sbin/sendmail -t which I believe will end up using smptd since I

Re: OpenBSD 5.7 Asterisk sendmail voice mail as email

On Thu, 28 May 2015, Peter Fraser wrote: Asterisk seems to run fine on 5.7 with one exception. I normally have voice mail messages send as emails. These emails are not being send. /usr/local/share/examples/asterisk/default/voicemail.conf has a variable ;mailcmd=/usr/sbin/sendmail

Re: OpenBSD 5.7 Asterisk sendmail voice mail as email

-Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Peter Fraser Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:18 PM To: 'misc@openbsd.org' Subject: OpenBSD 5.7 Asterisk sendmail voice mail as email Asterisk seems to run fine on 5.7 with one exception. I

Re: Openbsd 5.7 and sendmail

Thanks I managed to miss noting that I should look at /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/sendmail-* -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of John Merriam Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 12:20 PM To: Peter Fraser Cc: 'misc@openbsd.org

Re: Openbsd 5.7 and sendmail

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:11:24PM +, Peter Fraser wrote: I put OpenBSD 5.7 up, but because we make use of the SpamHaus I didn't want to move to smtpd. It was easy enough to put sendmail in but I found I could not rebuild my /etc/mail/access.db makemap did not like the To: prefix

Openbsd 5.7 and sendmail

I put OpenBSD 5.7 up, but because we make use of the SpamHaus I didn't want to move to smtpd. It was easy enough to put sendmail in but I found I could not rebuild my /etc/mail/access.db makemap did not like the To: prefix in the /etc/mail/access file. being somewhat slow to took me a couple

Re: Openbsd 5.7 and sendmail

On Tue, 26 May 2015, Peter Fraser wrote: I put OpenBSD 5.7 up, but because we make use of the SpamHaus I didn't want to move to smtpd. It was easy enough to put sendmail in but I found I could not rebuild my /etc/mail/access.db makemap did not like the To: prefix in the /etc/mail

Re: Simple sendmail configuration

Hi, On 12/20/14 21:48, Vijay Sankar wrote: I would like to try to help -- but not sure that I have understood your problem correctly, so here is a guess. To clarify: Out of the box OpenBSD5.6 uses /usr/share/sendmail/cf/openbsd-localhost.mc as the config source for its mail system

Re: Simple sendmail configuration

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 09:59:27PM +0100, Ulrich Grassberger wrote: Hi, On 12/20/14 21:48, Vijay Sankar wrote: I would like to try to help -- but not sure that I have understood your problem correctly, so here is a guess. To clarify: Out of the box OpenBSD5.6 uses /usr/share/sendmail

Simple sendmail configuration

Hello, i installed OpenBSD5.6 on a laptop, because Windows is too insecure and commercial, and Linux is too radical. I am trying to use $mail for receiving and sending e-mails over the remote e-mail account at my internet service provider. With the default sendmail configuration, i can mail only

Re: Simple sendmail configuration

internet service provider. With the default sendmail configuration, i can mail only locally. So i rewrote the config with masquerading but could not figure out how to link local users to their remote mail accounts. And i made a mistake, for now local mailing is also broken. I figure

Re: Simple sendmail configuration

provider. With the default sendmail configuration, i can mail only locally. So i rewrote the config with masquerading but could not figure out how to link local users to their remote mail accounts. And i made a mistake, for now local mailing is also broken. I figure, that there are many people like

Help w/ masquerade feature now that sendmail[1] has been removed from base

sendmail's masquerade function is missing from OpenSMTPD. What are the plans for masquerade? Update OpenSMTPD or create a sendmail port or document the smtpd filter API or ??? I've previously asked for help on the opensmtpd-misc mailing list[2]. Searching the archives shows that work

Re: Help w/ masquerade feature now that sendmail[1] has been removed from base

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:41:20AM -0400, RD Thrush wrote: sendmail's masquerade function is missing from OpenSMTPD. What are the plans for masquerade? Update OpenSMTPD or create a sendmail port or document the smtpd filter API or ??? I've previously asked for help on the opensmtpd-misc

Re: Help w/ masquerade feature now that sendmail[1] has been removed from base

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:41:20AM -0400, RD Thrush wrote: sendmail's masquerade function is missing from OpenSMTPD. What are the plans for masquerade? Update OpenSMTPD or create a sendmail port or document the smtpd filter API or ??? I've previously asked for help on the opensmtpd-misc

Re: sendmail cannot deliver to cyrus-imapd(solved?)

You didn't provide a dmesg so I don't know what architecture you're on, but that code will certainly fail on i386 and other ILP32 archs because it assumes time_t is the same size as long. As of OpenBSD 5.5 it's now a long long, which is larger on ILP32 archs. That and other printing/scanning

sendmail cannot deliver to cyrus-imapd(solved?)

Hello I updated to 5.5 i386 and built from stable source OPENBSD_5_5. pkg_delete cyrus-imapd and rebuild from ports. cyrus-imapd lmtpd crash and sendmail can not deliver to cyrusv2. — Jun 15 00:17:14 saturn master[7397]: about to exec /usr/local/libexec/cyrus-imap d/lmtpd Jun 15 00:17:14 saturn

sendmail cannot deliver to cyrus-imapd(solved?)

Hello I update to 5.5 and build from stable source OPENBSD_5_5. pkg_delete cyrus-imapd from rebuild from ports. cyrus-imapd lmtpd crash and sendmail can not deliver to cyrusv2. — Jun 15 00:17:14 saturn master[7397]: about to exec /usr/local/libexec/cyrus-imap d/lmtpd Jun 15 00:17:14 saturn

Re: sendmail cannot deliver to cyrus-imapd(solved?)

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Takaaki Kobayashi takaaki.kobaya...@nifty.com wrote: I update to 5.5 and build from stable source OPENBSD_5_5. pkg_delete cyrus-imapd from rebuild from ports. cyrus-imapd lmtpd crash and sendmail can not deliver to cyrusv2. — Jun 15 00:17:14 saturn

Re: sendmail in afterboot(8)

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 07:51:55AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: After installing a fresh system (current/amd64), I noticed that afterboot(8) still mentions Sendmail as the default mailer: Sendmail The default mail agent on OpenBSD is sendmail(8). Details on how

sendmail in afterboot(8)

After installing a fresh system (current/amd64), I noticed that afterboot(8) still mentions Sendmail as the default mailer: Sendmail The default mail agent on OpenBSD is sendmail(8). Details on how to configure an alternative mailer

Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote: So $riva is a member of $lokisafe, right? Bingo! I knew it would be something trivial that I'd overlooked. All working now. Thanks, Tet -- Java is a DSL for taking large XML files and converting them to stack traces -- Bulat

Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

On 2013-12-18, Tethys tet...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote: block in log block out log on $ext How could anyone help you knowing just these two lines? Show your pf.conf I was trying to show that I only had two block lines and that they

Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

i think that u will have to track down the packets tcpdump can be the solution, or disable blocking while u find the offensive rule then fix it! Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:56:33 + To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction From: skin...@britvault.co.uk On 2013-12

Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

My firewall died recently, so I replaced it with a new machine. Since I needed to reinstall the OS, I naturally went for 5.4, rather than whatever obsolete version I'd been using on the old machine. But now I can't get incoming email. My setup is something like: public mx --- firewall ---

Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Aaron kmiy...@comcast.net wrote: Did you enable forwarding? net.inet.ip.forwarding Yes. Packets are being forwarded without problems, and it's working as a firewall exactly as you'd expect for outbound traffic. I can browse the web etc. But something strange

Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

Did you enable forwarding? net.inet.ip.forwarding Aaron On 12/17/13 11:25, Tethys wrote: My firewall died recently, so I replaced it with a new machine. Since I needed to reinstall the OS, I naturally went for 5.4, rather than whatever obsolete version I'd been using on the old machine. But

Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

On 2013-12-17 Tue 17:05 PM |, Tethys wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Craig R. Skinner skin...@britvault.co.uk wrote: I guess you have net.inetsomething.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf Yes, I do. I can browse the web etc from inside the firewall without problems. Does the

Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote: block in log block out log on $ext How could anyone help you knowing just these two lines? Show your pf.conf I was trying to show that I only had two block lines and that they both should log when blocking packets. My rules are

Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

instead doesn't prompt the same behaviour. Tet this shouldn't be this hard.. can we see output from netstat -rnf inet, pfctl -vvsr, maybe output from dmesg? You never indicated what MX server you're running. postfix, actual sendmail, opensmtpd... ?? Your config from the smtp server would

Re: Bizarre pf/sendmail interaction

On Dec 18 02:11:55, tet...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote: block in log block out log on $ext How could anyone help you knowing just these two lines? Show your pf.conf I was trying to show that I only had two block lines and that

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

execute sendmail, or handle the socket connections themselves, or use a library (phpmailer etc). @owner ${DRUPAL_OWNER}

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

but it's rather limited (on unix, it just pipes to a program and can't do smtp-auth), also some server hosts disable it, so in practice most larger PHP apps have another way of sending mail where they either execute sendmail, or handle the socket connections themselves, or use a library (phpmailer etc

php sending mail via sendmail

Dear group, when trying different php based open source packages on a chrooted 5.2 box, I was faced with the problem not being able to send email from their php script. All the times I get following entry in the maillog: w...@example.com [x.x.x.x] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:38:37PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote: Dear group, when trying different php based open source packages on a chrooted 5.2 box, I was faced with the problem not being able to send email from their php script. All the times I get following entry in the maillog:

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

On 09/02/13 14:46, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:38:37PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote: Dear group, when trying different php based open source packages on a chrooted 5.2 box, I was faced with the problem not being able to send email from their php script. All the times I get

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 02:53:09PM -0400, Scott McEachern wrote: The problem there is that femail-chroot requires putting a shell into that chroot, which is something I personally avoid. Well, whether you need a shell depends on how scripts run external programs. E.g. PHPMailer uses popen(),

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

did install both. Now, what are the settings in order to make them work? Found following for femail: http://rilk.com/en/doc/node/48 but these changes didn't have any effect. I still get the same error. Thanks On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote: On Mon,

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:23:46PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote: did install both. Now, what are the settings in order to make them work? Depends on your php application. It will probably try to run /usr/sbin/sendmail, in which case you should ensure that exists in the chroot. In my case I had

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

work? Depends on your php application. It will probably try to run /usr/sbin/sendmail, in which case you should ensure that exists in the chroot. In my case I had to copy /var/www/bin/femail to /var/www/usr/sbin/sendmail, and copy /bin/sh to /var/www/bin/sh to make PHPmailer happy. You'll also

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

in the PHP application in order to find the reason of the problem? Also, what about the pear-Mail package? Is there something I should adapt? The log message you showed earlier seems to be from sendmail complaining that someone trying to relay mail is not doing smtp correctly. It comes from

Re: php sending mail via sendmail

? Is there something I should adapt? The log message you showed earlier seems to be from sendmail complaining that someone trying to relay mail is not doing smtp correctly. It comes from the function smtp() in sendmail, see /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail/srvrsmtp.c but aaah my eyes! Perhaps

Sendmail not working on 5.3

I upgraded to OpenBSD 5.3 on the release day, I've since updated to the latest patch branch (not that there is any related errata to this question). I can't seem to send mail out with a server, it is not my pf rules. It was indicated by phpmailer not working. I can't find my sendmail logs. John

Re: Sendmail not working on 5.3

with a server, it is not my pf rules. It was indicated by phpmailer not working. I can't find my sendmail logs. John -- www.johntate.org -- www.johntate.org

Re: smtpd vs sendmail cronjob

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:20:21PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: The smtpd(8) manpage documents the steps needed to replace the default sendmail with smtpd. However, it does not mention the sendmail clientmqueue runner cronjob. That should probably be edited from the root's cronjob, right

Re: sendmail config [solved]

Thanks for all the prompt replies. The MUA is indeed the place to do the modifications. Just for the records, in SqurrelMail I had to modify the file 'class/deliver/Deliver.class.php' Tony On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, James Griffin j...@kontrol.kode5.netwrote: Fri

Re: sendmail config

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm running a 386 5.2 OpenBSD box with sendmail and would like to strip following headers from the outgoing e-mails: *Received:* from x.x.x.x (SquirrelMail authenticated user user) by new.host.name

Re: sendmail config

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm running a 386 5.2 OpenBSD box with sendmail and would like to strip following headers from the outgoing e-mails: *Received:* from x.x.x.x

Re: sendmail config

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:27, Tony Berth wrote: I want to display the IP of the mail server only, as client IPs isn't a relevant info for the 'outside world'. The same applies to the 'User-Agent' field. Wouldn't a more reasonable approach be to fix the squirrel mail config to do what you

Re: sendmail config

good point indeed. I tried with conf.pl but didn't have any effect. For example, I turned version info off but still, sendmail propagates the complete info. Thanks Tony On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:27, Tony Berth wrote

Re: sendmail config

Fri 12.Apr'13 at 9:27:14 +0300 Tony Berth I want to display the IP of the mail server only, as client IPs isn't a relevant info for the 'outside world'. The same applies to the 'User-Agent' field. Concerning the 'References', It was just an idea but still I

Re: sendmail config

On 04/12/13 09:57, Tony Berth wrote: Dear group, I'm running a 386 5.2 OpenBSD box with sendmail and would like to strip following headers from the outgoing e-mails: *Received:* from x.x.x.x (SquirrelMail authenticated user user) by new.host.name with HTTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013

Re: sendmail config

You need to utilize sendmail's milter interface to write an application to strip out these headers. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:21:14PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm running a 386 5.2 OpenBSD box with sendmail

sendmail config

Dear group, I'm running a 386 5.2 OpenBSD box with sendmail and would like to strip following headers from the outgoing e-mails: *Received:* from x.x.x.x (SquirrelMail authenticated user user) by new.host.name with HTTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:31:59 +0300 [from the above I would like

smtpd vs sendmail cronjob

The smtpd(8) manpage documents the steps needed to replace the default sendmail with smtpd. However, it does not mention the sendmail clientmqueue runner cronjob. That should probably be edited from the root's cronjob, right? Jan

sendmail stops remote delivery when PTR for local IP points to domain-part

For the sendmail heroes out there... Let's say I have the following in DNS: $ORIGIN example.com. @ IN MX 10 mx1 @ IN A 192.0.2.1 @ IN 2001:db8::1 mx1 IN A 192.0.2.2 mx1 IN 2001:db8::2 www

Re: sendmail stops remote delivery when PTR for local IP points to domain-part

Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl writes: For the sendmail heroes out there... Let's say I have the following in DNS: $ORIGIN example.com. @ IN MX 10 mx1 @ IN A 192.0.2.1 @ IN 2001:db8::1 mx1 IN A 192.0.2.2 mx1 IN

Re: sendmail stops remote delivery when PTR for local IP points to domain-part

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:23:18PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote: For the sendmail heroes out there... Let's say I have the following in DNS: $ORIGIN example.com. @ IN MX 10 mx1 @ IN A 192.0.2.1 @ IN 2001:db8::1 mx1IN A 192.0.2.2

Re: sendmail stops remote delivery when PTR for local IP points to domain-part

mailertable should work in this case, I think. Vijay Sankar ForeTell Technologies Limited vsan...@foretell.ca Sent from my iPhone On 2013-03-21, at 7:23 AM, Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl wrote: For the sendmail heroes out there... Let's say I have the following in DNS: $ORIGIN

Re: sendmail stops remote delivery when PTR for local IP points to domain-part

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:40:11PM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote: Are you sure this is becaus of the PTR record (according to the subject of your email)? I think sendmail looks up the A and MX record for example.com and sees that the A record is a local IP. So, do you need the A record

Re: sendmail stops remote delivery when PTR for local IP points to domain-part

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:40:11PM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote: | Are you sure this is becaus of the PTR record (according to the subject of | your email)? I think sendmail looks up the A and MX record for | example.com and sees that the A record is a local IP. Yes, I'm sure. I'm moving

Re: sendmail stops remote delivery when PTR for local IP points to domain-part

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 07:32:46AM -0400, Vijay Sankar wrote: | mailertable should work in this case, I think. That's not how I read the comments in /etc/mail/mailertable: # The sendmail(8) mailer table is used to override routing for particular # non-local hostnames and domains (i.e., names

Re: sendmail stops remote delivery when PTR for local IP points to domain-part

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:11:36PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: | - change PTR records to www.example.com | | I'd really go with this. That's what I'll do if I can't resolve this in another (nice) way... | http://weldon.whipple.org/sendmail/removew.html discusses this and gives

Re: sendmail stops remote delivery when PTR for local IP points to domain-part

/mailertable: # The sendmail(8) mailer table is used to override routing for particular # non-local hostnames and domains (i.e., names other the local hostname # or names listed in local-host-names). The way I understand the mailertable is to do the exact opposite of what I want (so you're

Re: enabling sendmail

- Marc Espie es...@nerim.net [2013-02-24 13:21:09 +0100] - : On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 08:57:14AM +, James Griffin wrote: - rich...@thornton.net rich...@thornton.net [2013-02-21 00:29:45 +] - : Is sendmail enabled by default? If not, how do I do that? It's

Re: enabling sendmail

- rich...@thornton.net rich...@thornton.net [2013-02-21 00:29:45 +] - : Is sendmail enabled by default? If not, how do I do that? It's not enabled by default. And you need to copy /usr/share/sendmail/cf/openbsd-proto.mc to your hostname.mc; edit it with your requirements, then use

Re: enabling sendmail

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 08:57:14AM +, James Griffin wrote: - rich...@thornton.net rich...@thornton.net [2013-02-21 00:29:45 +] - : Is sendmail enabled by default? If not, how do I do that? It's not enabled by default. And you need to copy /usr/share/sendmail/cf/openbsd

enabling sendmail

Is sendmail enabled by default? If not, how do I do that?

Re: enabling sendmail

Yes and you don't have to do anything, unless you need to enable a different set of sendmail rules but that will depend on what you want to accomplish. -luis On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:29 PM, rich...@thornton.net wrote: Is sendmail enabled by default? If not, how do I do that?

Re: enabling sendmail

On 02/24/13 12:54, Luis Coronado wrote: Yes and you don't have to do anything, unless you need to enable a different set of sendmail rules but that will depend on what you want to accomplish. -luis On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:29 PM, rich...@thornton.net wrote: Is sendmail enabled by default

Re: enabling sendmail

In addition to what others have said, default sendmail listens on 127.0.0.1, so you will require configuration to get it going. On that note, also look at smtpd - it's sendmail without the complexity! -ag -- sent via 100% recycled electrons from my mobile command center. On Feb 20, 2013, at 4

Re: man -k sendmail in section 1

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:23:15PM -0700, Chris Hettrick wrote: I noticed that apropos sendmail states that it is from Section 1 of the man pages, but it should be in Section 8. This is found on an AMD64 5.2 and also on the web interface. man 8 sendmail works, but man 1 sendmail doesn't

man -k sendmail in section 1

I noticed that apropos sendmail states that it is from Section 1 of the man pages, but it should be in Section 8. This is found on an AMD64 5.2 and also on the web interface. man 8 sendmail works, but man 1 sendmail doesn't (as expected). Chris

Sendmail ignore the /etc/hosts file!

Hi! Can someone please confirm that this method is working: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#SendmailDNS Running on 5.1-RELEASE! Thanks! Br/Anders

opensmtpd php_mail /usr/sbin/sendmail

Hello misc. There are many web applications that used php_mail function, which points to /usr/sbin/sendmail on localhost. In some case sendmail used with smart_host+masquerade options to deliver email via gmail for example. Configure sendmail to work with gmail (SMTP AUTH/TLS) is hard for me

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >