On Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:45:00 +0100,
"Corey Hickman" wrote:
>
> does it have policy server included? for instance, when DKIM fails, the
> policy can be set up to deny the message.
>
Right now it ignores DMARC as if it doesn't exist.
Doing a DMARC lookup for domain and inserting it's results in
Greetings,
I'd like to announce a two new filters for OpenSMTD which better to use
together: auth and sign.
auth is a filter which verify DKMI, ARC and SPF, and iprev. It adds
Authentication-Results header or ARC-Authentication-Results.
sign is a filter which adds DKMI or ARC signature, o
wondering if i could make opensmtpd completely bypass filters
(especially the rspamd filter).
Here is my smtpd config :
# This is the smtpd server system-wide configuration file.
# See smtpd.conf(5) for more information.
srs key REDACTED
srs key backup REDACTED
## Certs
pki gamindustri.fr
I should have included more information. OS is FreeBSD 13.2. smtpd is 7.3.0
which is the latest in the pkg collection.
Originally, the only change I made to the filter, was add
#!/usr/local/bin/python3.9 and made afilter.py executable.
All other filters terminate correctly when smtpd exits
be used w/
PR_SET_PDEATHSIG.)
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:53:39AM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
April 2, 2024 4:47 AM, and...@tekrealm.net wrote:
What signals a termination for smtpd filters?
I'm using the code at
https://github.com/Beutlin/howto-opensmtpd-filters-and-reports,
Which work
April 2, 2024 4:47 AM, and...@tekrealm.net wrote:
> What signals a termination for smtpd filters?
>
> I'm using the code at
> https://github.com/Beutlin/howto-opensmtpd-filters-and-reports,
> Which works great, except for when smtpd gets shutdown. The script continues
> to
What signals a termination for smtpd filters?
I'm using the code at
https://github.com/Beutlin/howto-opensmtpd-filters-and-reports,
Which works great, except for when smtpd gets shutdown. The script continues
to run and
consumes up to 100% cpu time, while keeping the smtpd parent? pr
#x27;d like to stress the point that a key difference of OpenSMTPD'
filters is that they DO NOT EXIT. A filter is just a program (or a
script) that is executed by smtpd at start and never exits. If a
filter quits, it's a non-recoverable failure and smtpd dies too.
The filter and smtp
You basically write a script that processes incoming lines on stdin, and
writes back to stdout. The protocol is described in smtpd-filters(7).
This basic idea in lua would be something like:
for line in io.lines() do
if line == 'in' then
io.write('out')
end
tains bar, accept.
>>
>> Such a sample script would help very much to support users write their own
>> custom filters. Thanking you
>> Sagar Acharya
>> https://humaaraartha.in/selfdost/selfdost.html
>>
myfilter.lua within /etc/smtpd/
Can one please help with a sample whose pseudocode goes like
fetch(mail)if mailbody contains foo, reject,
else if mailbody contains bar, accept.
Such a sample script would help very much to support users write their own custom filters.
Thanking you
Sagar Acharya
https
script would help very much to support users write their own
custom filters.
Thanking you
Sagar Acharya
https://humaaraartha.in/selfdost/selfdost.html
ATA which contains the headers is emitted
by the client AFTER
that MAIL FROM and RCPT TO are both accepted, so it's already too late to
rewrite them.
> From reading the smtpd-filters man page, and the palant.info article [1] it
> seems that the filter
> would first receive the
Hello,
Is it possible to configure OpenSMTPD in some way so that it would grab a
specific header from an email message, and use it in the MAIL FROM field?
>From reading the smtpd-filters man page, and the palant.info article [1] it
>seems that the filter would first receive the MAIL FROM
Heho,
i am currently looking at adding MTA-STS/DANE support to my mailer;
However, these are not supported in opensmtpd.
Given my limited coding abilities, i figured it might make more sense
to try implementing that as a filter, given that [1] mentions outbound
filters. however, man smtpd-filters
I'm new to OpenSMTPd (on OpenBSD 7.0-release) and when I started looking
into filters I came up with some questions that the smtpd.conf manpage
doesn't seem to answer.
- for 'filter ... proc ...' and 'filter ... proc-exec ...' where in the
processing of the mes
Hi Martin,
thank you very much for your response. I stumbled over this
lost man page looking for additional information about the
filters mentioned on https://man.openbsd.org/smtpd.conf.
Apparently there are a few more unused source files in the git
repository. They are very hard to detect
filters are implemented in lka_filter.c.
According to cvs log filter.c is removed in 2017 and was probably part
of the first filter attempt.
smtpd-filters.7 has never been hooked up to the build. Probably
because it needs a little more scrutiny. But most in there can be
used.
martijn@
On Fri
Hi folks,
looking at github there is a file "smtpd-filters.7" and "filter.c"
in smtpd, but apparently they are not used at build or install time.
configure.ac doesn't mention them, either, so I wonder whats the
story here? Have they been forgotten? Obsolete code?
Regards
Harri
On 1/7/21 3:03 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
Could you show your config, steps to reproduce and expected behaviour?
Because I'm not entirely sure what you try to achieve.
I was trying to see which rules in smtpd.conf match. "smtpctl trace all"
didn't work.
Problem was, I hadn't enabled debug l
On Jan 7, 2021 5:45 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:Hi folks,
for debugging I would like to know which "match" line does
actually match the incoming EMails. Is there some option for
opensmtpd to watch it? "-v" seems to be insufficient.
Every insightful comment would be highly appreciated.
Reg
Could you show your config, steps to reproduce and expected behaviour?
Because I'm not entirely sure what you try to achieve.
On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 13:24 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 1/7/21 1:03 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > Your question isn't really specific, but my best guess is that -Tf
On 1/7/21 1:03 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
Your question isn't really specific, but my best guess is that -Tfilters
will do the trick.
I tried "smtpctl trace all", but there was no visual effect.
Regards
Harri
Your question isn't really specific, but my best guess is that -Tfilters
will do the trick.
martijn@
On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 12:45 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> for debugging I would like to know which "match" line does
> actually match the incoming EMails. Is there some option for
>
Hi folks,
for debugging I would like to know which "match" line does
actually match the incoming EMails. Is there some option for
opensmtpd to watch it? "-v" seems to be insufficient.
Every insightful comment would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Harri
porting is informative only.
I felt that the line stating it was a one-way stream covered it.
Mainly it just made me stumble on the line and have to reread it a
couple of times.
Edgar
diff --git a/smtpd/smtpd-filters.7 b/smtpd/smtpd-filters.7
index 1e1a27ef..bf563174 100644
--- a/smtpd/smtpd
On 01/25/20 14:08, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
The diff reads ok but I wonder why you removed this sentence:
-No decision is ever taken by the report stream.
I think it made it a bit more clear that reporting is informative only.
I felt that the line stating it was a one-way stream covered it.
The diff reads ok but I wonder why you removed this sentence:
-No decision is ever taken by the report stream.
I think it made it a bit more clear that reporting is informative only.
diff --git a/smtpd/smtpd-filters.7 b/smtpd/smtpd-filters.7
index 1e1a27ef..3cdb10e1 100644
--- a/smtpd/smtpd-filters.7
+++ b/smtpd/smtpd-filters.7
@@ -89,22 +89,21 @@ to inform
in real-time about events that are occurring in the daemon.
The report events do not expect an answer from
.Nm ,
-it
) we check (match) if reverse dns is invalid (!rdns) and
if so then disconnect the session. For invalid, this would mean no reverse dns,
or an incorrectly configured reverse dns.
I did read the man page about ’smtpd.conf’, more so about filters and wanted be
sure I comprehend it.
Thanks
Nin
January 4, 2020 12:25 AM, "Antonino Sidoti" wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
> I have some basic questions about filters?
>
> What do we need to negate the rdns for the following command?
>
> filter f01 phase connect match !rdns disconnect "550 missing rD
Hello,
I have some basic questions about filters?
What do we need to negate the rdns for the following command?
filter f01 phase connect match !rdns disconnect "550 missing rDNS”
Can someone please explain the difference between reject and disconnect when
used in a filter?
On 8/21/19 12:50 PM, Michiel van Es wrote:
I am running a small VPS with 1 GB memory with Debian 10 amd64 with OpenSMTPD
(6.0.3)
Hello, can you really use Buster's official opensmptd package? I tried
it about 3 weeks ago and it was broken out of the box for me (can't
really remember what
On 9/9/19 7:16 PM, Reio Remma wrote:
> On 09.09.2019 20:03, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>>> I'm currently using amavisd-new with the quarantine feature, but I'm
>>> itching to switch to Rspamd (greylisting here I come!).
>>>
>> amavisd-new 2.12 has rspamd support, have you tried it ?
>
> Curious! I se
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 07:48:16PM +0300, Reio Remma wrote:
> On 09.09.2019 18:13, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 9/9/19 3:37 PM, Reio Remma wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Slowly digging into filters.
>>
>> Now I'm curious if it's possible to modify the rec
On 09.09.2019 20:03, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
I'm currently using amavisd-new with the quarantine feature, but I'm itching to
switch to Rspamd (greylisting here I come!).
amavisd-new 2.12 has rspamd support, have you tried it ?
Curious! I see the project has again switched hands, if you mean t
On 9/9/19 6:48 PM, Reio Remma wrote:
> On 09.09.2019 18:13, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> On 9/9/19 3:37 PM, Reio Remma wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> Slowly digging into filters.
>>>
>>> Now I'm curious if it's possible to modify the recip
On 09.09.2019 18:13, Martijn van Duren wrote:
On 9/9/19 3:37 PM, Reio Remma wrote:
Hello!
Slowly digging into filters.
Now I'm curious if it's possible to modify the recipient after say spam
check in data-line? I get the impression that rewriting rcpt-to at that
stage is impossib
September 9, 2019 3:37 PM, "Reio Remma" wrote:
> Hello!
>
Hello,
> Slowly digging into filters.
>
> Now I'm curious if it's possible to modify the recipient after say spam check
> in data-line? I get
> the impression that rewriting rcpt-to at that
Hello!
Slowly digging into filters.
Now I'm curious if it's possible to modify the recipient after say spam
check in data-line? I get the impression that rewriting rcpt-to at that
stage is impossible, but my goal would be to redirect/quarantine high
scoring spam to a special e-ma
ate email and am looking what my best options are
>> to limit spam.
>> I know there are some filters from Joerg
>> (https://www.mail-archive.com/misc@opensmtpd.org/msg04402.html) but am not
>> sure if these will work with my version of OpenSMTPD (I get a syntax error
>>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:50:10PM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote:
> Hi!
>
Hi,
> I am running a small VPS with 1 GB memory with Debian 10 amd64 with OpenSMTPD
> (6.0.3) for private email and am looking what my best options are to limit
> spam.
> I know there are some
Hi!
I am running a small VPS with 1 GB memory with Debian 10 amd64 with OpenSMTPD
(6.0.3) for private email and am looking what my best options are to limit spam.
I know there are some filters from Joerg
(https://www.mail-archive.com/misc@opensmtpd.org/msg04402.html) but am not sure
if these
able release is out I will start documenting and making
some of the changes I wanted so that it's "stable" in 6.6.
If you're a developer, you can use filters in 6.5, you just need to be
advanced enough to read code.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:03:57AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wro
See https://poolp.org/, there are some things available, but as far as
I'm aware everything is still experimental.
martijn@
On 4/26/19 9:45 PM, Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
> Namaste misc,
>
> I was wondering whether the absence of filters on the 6.5 [1] and
> current smtpd.con
Namaste misc,
I was wondering whether the absence of filters on the 6.5 [1] and
current smtpd.conf(5) [2] manpages along with the modest OpenSMTPD 6.5.0
release notes [3] should be read into.
In other words, are filters ready for general use?
Dhanyavaad.
Regards,
ab
[1] - https
Yay, Christmas is pretty early this year. ;)
> Hi,
> I have started committing filters support to OpenBSD today in order
> to get them nice and ready for the next major release.
> The only part missing at this point is DATA filtering which I'll
> probably finish by
Hi,I have started committing filters support to OpenBSD today in order to get them nice and ready for the next major release.The only part missing at this point is DATA filtering which I'll probably finish by the end of November.Filters are in development meaning that keywords will c
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> we have something else which we will disclose shortly
Cool, looking forward!
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:41:51PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I noticed you've removed support for filters in the latest CVS. Does
> this mean that avenue of development is totally dead? Or do you have
> something else that will be released with the next vers
Hey,
I noticed you've removed support for filters in the latest CVS. Does
this mean that avenue of development is totally dead? Or do you have
something else that will be released with the next version?
Jason
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.o
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 07:42:50PM +1000, Damian McGuckin wrote:
>
> Where are simple filters at? I noticed they are still experimental? Has
> anything progressed recently?
>
> Just looking for something that will allow blocking on Sender, Recipient,
> and Subject (with patter
Where are simple filters at? I noticed they are still experimental? Has
anything progressed recently?
Just looking for something that will allow blocking on Sender, Recipient, and
Subject (with pattern matching for all of these).
As a potential alternative, how much extra load is placed on
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Nope but you'd have better luck asking on m...@openbsd.org rather than
this list which is unrelated to sendmail :-)
Thanks.
I will be one of the first testers of OpenSMPTD once there is a mechanism
(integral to it) which can filter on RBLs.
Regards
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:16:04PM +1100, Damian McGuckin wrote:
>
> I was looking to run with 'OpenSMTPD' but I really need the ability to use
> RBLs.
>
> Anyway, if I turn off and 'smtpd' daemon by setting
>
> smtpd_flags=NO
>
> in
>
> /etc/rc.conf.local
>
> and install the 'sen
I was looking to run with 'OpenSMTPD' but I really need the ability to use
RBLs.
Anyway, if I turn off and 'smtpd' daemon by setting
smtpd_flags=NO
in
/etc/rc.conf.local
and install the 'sendmail' package, nothing, I firstly had to manually
create
/var/log/maillog
;m actually very surprised to see that simple filters like regexp, or
> > the very useful spamassassin are gone.
> >
>
> This experimental API has been enabled for developers to help us find if
> there are shortcomings, design errors and bugs in the filter layer so we
> can m
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:57:18PM +0200, Thuban wrote:
> Hello,
> I just upgraded openbsd 5.9 to 6.0. As announced on the upgrade page,
> some parts of opensmtpd-extras disappeared. Okay.
>
> I'm actually very surprised to see that simple filters like regexp, or
> the v
* Thuban [160902 13:57]:
> Hello,
> I just upgraded openbsd 5.9 to 6.0. As announced on the upgrade page,
> some parts of opensmtpd-extras disappeared. Okay.
>
> I'm actually very surprised to see that simple filters like regexp, or
> the very useful spamassassin are gon
Hello,
I just upgraded openbsd 5.9 to 6.0. As announced on the upgrade page,
some parts of opensmtpd-extras disappeared. Okay.
I'm actually very surprised to see that simple filters like regexp, or
the very useful spamassassin are gone.
Anyway, is there any plan to include them in open
Ehlo,
With last release we made the experimental filters API available so that
developers could start writing filters, spot shortcomings in the API and
let people test them to try to spot bugs we missed.
As we expected, several issues were spotted and we work on fixing them.
This is all great
o
> > store a per-session dictionnary where i can store stuff I want to
> > retain between callbacks
> >
>
> Thanks, I'll give it a try.
>
> Btw: why do I not see the filter log calls (e.g. from filter-trace), if I use
> $ echo "foo" | mail -s "b
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:49:24AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:21:03AM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:57:00PM +0100, frit...@alokat.org wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > is it possible to share data between callback functions in a python-based
> >
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:21:03AM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:57:00PM +0100, frit...@alokat.org wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is it possible to share data between callback functions in a python-based
> > filter?
> > I'm looking for something like this one (from the clamav filt
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:57:00PM +0100, frit...@alokat.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to share data between callback functions in a python-based
> filter?
> I'm looking for something like this one (from the clamav filter):
> - filter_api_set_udata
> - filter_api_get_udata
I think you coul
Hi,
is it possible to share data between callback functions in a python-based
filter?
I'm looking for something like this one (from the clamav filter):
- filter_api_set_udata
- filter_api_get_udata
If it's not, how can I compile a C-based filter?
gcc(1) says: smtpd-api.h no such file or director
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 04:44:09PM +1100, Damian McGuckin wrote:
>
> I would like to read something before 'playing' is done.
Old, but still mostly valid:
https://poolp.org/0xa871/The-state-of-filters
Also, all you need can be found in man pages and
the most recent opensmtpd-e
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Sunil Nimmagadda wrote:
Filters require you to be -current. On OpenBSD the simplest way to test...
Thanks. That's extremely very useful. That was never mentioned anywhere.
I'll wait until 5.9 comes out.
We never run '-current' to protect sites.
Regar
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Sunil Nimmagadda wrote:
>
> >> Also, in the package you mention, there appears to be no documentation
> >> about how to use the filters.
> >
> > man smptd.conf, specifically these sections...
> > filter name filter [arguments]
&
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Sunil Nimmagadda wrote:
Also, in the package you mention, there appears to be no documentation
about how to use the filters.
man smptd.conf, specifically these sections...
filter name filter [arguments]
listen on [filter name] ...
I pulled down 5.7.3, from October
>
> Hi guys,
>
> If you do not mind, I will answer both in one.
>
> Giovanni:
>
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Giovanni .. wrote:
>
> > You should at least pkg_add opensmtpd-extras to start playing with
> > filters. In base there is only the opensmtpd core i
Hi guys,
If you do not mind, I will answer both in one.
Giovanni:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Giovanni .. wrote:
You should at least pkg_add opensmtpd-extras to start playing with
filters. In base there is only the opensmtpd core implementation.
Yes. I noticed that. But on the web-site
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Bechis [mailto:giova...@paclan.it]
Sent: Friday, January 1, 2016 12:34 PM
To: Damian McGuckin ; misc@opensmtpd.org
Subject: Re: Filters
Il 1 gennaio 2016 08:09:17 CET, Damian McGuckin ha scritto:
>
>Hi everybody,
>
>New to this list although
l I
>can
>do that, I do not want to deploy it.
>
>I can see the API code in the source try but not the instructions on
>how
>to use it.
>
>I found the document 'opensmtpd-LinuxCon2015.conf' by Giovanni Bechis
>and
>it seems to imply that filters are operati
but not the instructions on how
to use it.
I found the document 'opensmtpd-LinuxCon2015.conf' by Giovanni Bechis and
it seems to imply that filters are operational. In fact, it says
"there are filters available for dnsbl, regex matching,
Spam Assassin, and Cla
Hello.
Ist there any good beginner howto the filter in the add-on package
should work?
Thx.
Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
> smtpd -d gives me this:
> [...]
> info: filter-clamav: result stream: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
> warn: clamav_filter: on_eom: REJECT virus id=44fa746c81ec2474
> [...]
> But i can't get any logging from it in syslog. Is that by design, or
> am i missing something obvious
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 08:01:52AM BST, Pete wrote:
> >> But i can't get any logging from it in syslog. Is that by design, or
> >> am i missing something obvious?
>
> > Yes, you are :^)
>
> > man 5 syslog.conf
>
> > Hint: facility, level and prog.
>
> Well, probably not something _that_ obvious
>> But i can't get any logging from it in syslog. Is that by design, or
>> am i missing something obvious?
> Yes, you are :^)
> man 5 syslog.conf
> Hint: facility, level and prog.
Well, probably not something _that_ obvious. ;)
Even with below config nothing turns up.
But when looking at the co
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:16:54PM BST, z...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have filter-clamav (and others) plugged into 5.7.1 (OpenBSD 5.7) and
> it's working fine so far. Thanks for that, it's awesome.
>
> smtpd -d gives me this:
> [...]
> info: filter-clamav: result stream: Eicar-Test-
Hi,
I have filter-clamav (and others) plugged into 5.7.1 (OpenBSD 5.7) and it's
working fine so
far. Thanks for that, it's awesome.
smtpd -d gives me this:
[...]
info: filter-clamav: result stream: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
warn: clamav_filter: on_eom: REJECT virus id=44fa746c
ohai,
I know some of you are _VERY_ interested in filters, so I wrote a blurb
on my blog to discuss the state of filters in OpenSMTPD.
https://poolp.org/0xa871/The-state-of-filters
Feel free to react here ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
Hello misc@,
I'm trying to set up the filter-dkim-signer from the OpenSMTPD-extras
repository on my OpenBSD 5.5 machine.
Unfortunately I can't seem to find the instructions to hook it up in my
smtpd.conf.
It would be much appreciated if someone could inform me on how to set
this up, or at le
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:20:27PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Ohai,
>
> In June, we will be having a private hackathon with Charles and Eric, to
> work on the filter API and infrastructure. This will happen at my place,
> it's kind of unofficial and it's unrelated to OpenBSD's hackathons.
>
>
Count me in.
Bryan
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:18:59PM +0200, Mathieu - wrote:
> You can count me in. Been quite busy these days, hence I couldn't help,
> it will be a good way to step in again.
>
> Btw, do you have ideas of filters or will we have to come up with some?
>
you will have
You can count me in. Been quite busy these days, hence I couldn't help,
it will be a good way to step in again.
Btw, do you have ideas of filters or will we have to come up with some?
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to:
Count me in.
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:20:27PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> In June, we will be having a private hackathon with Charles and Eric, to
> work on the filter API and infrastructure. This will happen at my place,
> it's kind of unofficial and it's unrelated to OpenBSD's hackathons.
>
[...]
>
> L
unofficial and it's unrelated to OpenBSD's hackathons.
>
> Why do you care ?
>
> If you want filters support in OpenSMTPD, well ...
>this is a great opportunity for you to actually help us !
>
> During this hackathon, we intend to make the API usable by the public
Ohai,
In June, we will be having a private hackathon with Charles and Eric, to
work on the filter API and infrastructure. This will happen at my place,
it's kind of unofficial and it's unrelated to OpenBSD's hackathons.
Why do you care ?
If you want filters support in
the very clean filter API with some example
> code. However, it's not mentioned in the man pages and even a "grep
> filter" hardly returns anything from the build/make scripts. What's
> the easiest way to build with filters to already play around with them
> a little bi
e great work!
After running it successfully for some time, I browsed the sources
today and discovered the very clean filter API with some example
code. However, it's not mentioned in the man pages and even a "grep
filter" hardly returns anything from the build/make scripts. What's
93 matches
Mail list logo
