DeMoN LaG wrote:
Bamm Gabriana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:a6jf24$4cb3
@ripley.netscape.com, on 11 Mar 2002:
Bundy sincerely believes he is right and wants Mozilla to succeed,
but he believes the developers are taking Mozilla in the wrong
direction.
Then Bundy is just a delusional
Netscape Basher wrote:
Are there mirror sites besides ftp.mozilla.org?
http://www.mozilla.org/mirrors.html . But not all of them have picked up
0.9.9 yet.
Gerv
Hello,
Please visit the website http://www.dcview.com.tw
and see if it display correctly ?
Nestcape 4.78 IE5.5 display correctly, but Mozilla 0.9.9 0.9.8+
(build 2002031008) don't. Before these release, Mozilla displayed correctly.
Thanks a lot.
¿Is there someone near to mozilla, who speak or know French?
I'd appreciate if can help me to translate few things from english to
french.
/.lancer
¿Is there someone near to mozilla, who speak or know French?
I'll appreciate if can help me to translate few things from english to
french.
/.lancer
I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https
doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the time
its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed.
Why isnt it installed by default?
At the very least, more needs to be done to make the if you dont
Income in the Information Age Give Yourself an Instant Pay RaiseHow would you like to double your income instantly and permanently?With twice the income, you could: Retire EarlyHave 4 day weekends for the rest of your lifeRaise your own childrenGet out of debtTake vacations anywhere in the
¿Is there someone near to mozilla, who speak or know French?
I'll appreciate if can help me to translate few things from english to
french.
/.lancer
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/11/2002 3:30 PM, Erik Corry wrote:
Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Also, according to your're explanation, if we list groups from our ISP,
then these very same groups should appear. They don't ... Why not? It's
usenet
I just tried accessing bugzilla to file a new 0.9.9 bug and the server
appears to be down. Can anyone else reach the webserver?
Geraint
--
Vizimarks - the Internet Scrapbook!
Visual Bookmarks, Online Favorites, and an Online Scrapbook.
Visit http://www.vizimarks.com today.
Hello,
Today I installed Mozilla 0.9.9 and had some test about Mail/News.
I found that attach as inline is not perfect as Mozilla 0.9.8+
(2002031008). The 0.9.9 just show strange codes, not words(Chinese)
after clicking Forward as inline. The 0.9.8+(2002031008) is ok to do
this.
Now I go back
Hello.
I would very much like to add the -fomit-frame-pointer compiler switch to
my Mozilla build (GNU compiler, Linux client) but cannot because it breaks
the regxpcom program. The program segfaults when run if it was built
with this compiler switch. So how can I specify the compiler
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geraint Edwards wrote:
I just tried accessing bugzilla to file a new 0.9.9 bug and the server
appears to be down. Can anyone else reach the webserver?
it does appear to be down, yes. i'm getting connection refused.
haven't managed to get 0.9.9 yet either - the
No problem here!
Yeh You-Ying wrote:
Hello,
Today I installed Mozilla 0.9.9 and had some test about Mail/News.
I found that attach as inline is not perfect as Mozilla 0.9.8+
(2002031008). The 0.9.9 just show strange codes, not words(Chinese)
after clicking Forward as inline. The
No problem for me!
Yeh You-Ying wrote:
Hello,
Today I installed Mozilla 0.9.9 and had some test about Mail/News.
I found that attach as inline is not perfect as Mozilla 0.9.8+
(2002031008). The 0.9.9 just show strange codes, not words(Chinese)
after clicking Forward as inline. The
Stosh wrote in message a6ivsn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a6ivsn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Which to do? If download, which do I get? MacroMedia can't make up
it's mind for me.
Help appreciated
Download the NS one, it will give you an error when you run it, but will
extract the required plugin to a
The Financial News, March 2002
Production Mini-plants in mobile containers. Co-investment Program
"...Science Network will supply to countries and developing regions the technology and the necessary support for the production in series of Mini-plants in mobile containers (40-foot). The
Lassie wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a spelling checker module in Moz 0.9.8 ?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
joel [:)
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https
doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the time
its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed.
Why isnt it installed by default?
At the very least, more needs to be
Kryptolus wrote:
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https
doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the
time its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed.
Why isnt it installed by default?
At the very
On 03/12/2002 5:23 AM, Erik Corry wrote:
Yes, thanks for the confirmation.
There was no confirmation that I was aware of. I don't think you
understood what I wrote.
I understood exactly what you wrote. You are reading this group from
your ISP's news feed or other feed OTHER than logging
Till wrote:
Stosh wrote in message a6ivsn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a6ivsn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Which to do? If download, which do I get? MacroMedia can't make up
it's mind for me.
Help appreciated
Download the NS one, it will give you an error when you run it, but will
extract the
On 03/12/2002 7:35 AM, Jay Garcia wrote:
I'll reply to this reply using COX's feed and we'll see what's different
in the header info. I'm curious as well.
The reply I mentioned was done at approximately 7:37 CST on the COX group.
Still waiting to see it here at 7:50 am CST which should prove
On 03/12/2002 7:52 AM, Jay Garcia wrote:
This reply should be seen immediately upon refreshing the group while
logged in to THE server.
It is, as witnessed by the posted time of this reply.
--
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI
UFAQ -
On 03/12/2002 7:35 AM, Jay Garcia wrote:
On 03/12/2002 5:23 AM, Erik Corry wrote:
Yes, thanks for the confirmation.
There was no confirmation that I was aware of. I don't think you
understood what I wrote.
I understood exactly what you wrote. You are reading this group from
your ISP's
Hi All-
JUst got 0.9.9, man, it rendersfast, has a new mail notification on the
system tray, and fixes many of the buggy news and mail interface things
I saw with 0.9.8. It even picked up shockwave!
I love it so far
Stan
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä?
^^¹é¸¸ÀåÀÚŬ·´ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
µ·ÀÌ ¸ðÀ¸°í ºÎÀÚ°¡ µÇ´Â
°Í¿¡´Â ÁöÇý¿Í ¹ýÄ¢ÀÌ ÀÖ´õ±º¿ä.
±× ÁöÇý¿Í ¹ýÄ¢À»
¿©·¯ºÐ°ú °°ÀÌÇÏ·Á°í ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³Â½À´Ï´Ù.
¸¹ÀººÐµéÀÌ µ·À»
¹ú°ÔµÇ¼, ÇູÇØÁö¸é Àú¶ÇÇÑ ±â»Ú´Ï±î¿ä^-^
´Ô°ú ¸¹ÀººÐµéÀÇ ÁöÇýµµ
°°ÀÌ ÇßÀ¸¸é ÇÏ´Â ¹Ù·¥ÀÔ´Ï´Ù^-^
Jason Parker wrote:
One step closer to 1.0! Eee! :)
So will the next release be 1.0 because they are out of digits?
Or will it be 0.9.10, 0.9.9.1 or 0.10.0?
On 03/12/2002 10:58 AM, Sauron wrote:
Jason Parker wrote:
One step closer to 1.0! Eee! :)
So will the next release be 1.0 because they are out of digits?
Or will it be 0.9.10, 0.9.9.1 or 0.10.0?
No if necessary there might be a 0.9.10. But drivers@mozilla don't think
its necessary.
James Duberg wrote:
It sounds like it creates an installation in one user's home directory,
that everyone else uses. Is it better to wait until the rpm file is
available from Linux-Mandrake (or whatever file from whatever distro),
or does the tar.gz get you the same thing?
I don't remember
For several releases of Mozilla Mail, the Sender column in the list view
shows the recipient, not the sender. How do I fix this?
(I'm using 0.9.9, btw).
Thanks!
Blake Ross wrote:
You're so naive to believe that any of the 30 million users will even
notice the switch. Sounds like you're preparing your backup story
should this story turn out to be true. Worried, are we? ;-)
What bothers me is that a person with an netscape.com email address is
Lancer wrote:
¿Is there someone near to mozilla, who speak or know French?
I'll appreciate if can help me to translate few things from english to
french.
/.lancer
Sur quelle fenetre tu veux une traduction ?
En général, c'est assez clair, même en Anglais
Lassie
Stosh wrote in message news:a6l57n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Stosh wrote:
Hi All-
JUst got 0.9.9, man, it rendersfast, has a new mail notification on the
system tray, and fixes many of the buggy news and mail interface things
I saw with 0.9.8. It even picked up shockwave!
I love it so
Steve Snyder wrote:
I would very much like to add the -fomit-frame-pointer compiler switch to
my Mozilla build
No you wouldn't. Mozilla won't work. It's not just regxpcom that would
segfaults when you use that switch.
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002:
What bothers me is that a person with an @netscape.com email
address is saying should this turn out to be true. If an
@netscape person who *works* on gecko hasn't had it confirmed to
him, it
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https
doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the time
its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed.
Why isnt it installed by default?
It is. The only way to avoid
I downloaded mozilla-0.9.9.src.rpm and rebuilt it on one RH6.2 (with
upgraded ximian) box. I installed it on another RH6.2 box with
upgraded redhat gnome rpm's.
When I run mozilla from the command line, it returns an exit value of
127 without opening the browser.
When I run mozilla url I get:
I don't think he is complaining about the association, but rather that
usually in windows the icon for an image file is a thumbnail of the image...
Johnny Yen wrote:
Stosh wrote in message news:a6l57n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Stosh wrote:
Hi All-
JUst got 0.9.9, man, it rendersfast, has a new
Stosh wrote:
Stosh wrote:
Mozilla has
taken over my icons! When I try to assign an icon to a shortcut, I have
a bunch saved in a folder, and the attachment shows what it looks like
Please LMK what I need to do, I'll report a 'feature' or bug if I have
to
Stan
Since you've
Travis Crump wrote:
I don't think he is complaining about the association, but rather
that usually in windows the icon for an image file is a thumbnail of
the image...
But in the thumbnails apparently won't display unless IE is associated
with those image files. (See my previous post in
Preferences - Privacy Security - Cookies - Enable cookies based on
privacy levels [View]
Where is it? Anyhow, I want it back! :(
I can't get any response out of the ftp server to download 0.9.9, either
directly to the ftp or through http. Does that mean it's busy, or is there
a problem?
Title: Break the FREE!
Joseph N. wrote:
I can't get any response out of the ftp server to download 0.9.9, either
directly to the ftp or through http. Does that mean it's busy, or is there
a problem?
It's just busy. Try one of the mirrors:
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:http://mozilla.org/mirrors.html
On 03/12/2002 11:04 AM, DeMoN LaG wrote:
Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002:
What bothers me is that a person with an @netscape.com email
address is saying should this turn out to be true. If an
@netscape person who *works*
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 03/12/2002 11:04 AM, DeMoN LaG wrote:
Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002:
What bothers me is that a person with an @netscape.com email
address is saying should this turn out to be true. If an
@netscape
Parish wrote:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-857681.html
Source is Reuters
...although it only talks about the switch to Linux, not Mozilla
--
Software is like sex, it's better when it's free - Linus Torvalds
Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience
Up until 0.9.8 the sidebar search facility worked well for me. The
results came back split into 2 panes, the top half with a list of hits,
the bottom half with the actual list of hits as it would be shown by the
target search engine, Google for example.
Since 0.98 what happens is the bottom
Besides the are called .msf files now for Moz and N6 instead of .snm
which they had been calle since Communicator 4.0.0 days.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Joyce Severt wrote:
Can someone tell me if there is a way to recapture a message folder if
that folder is gone but I still have the
Hi everyone:
I installed Mozilla .9.9 yesterday and lost the use of the front and
back buttons .. I then removed and re-installed Netscape 6.2.1 but the
buttons still did not work. Is there any way of regaining the use of
these buttons.
Thanks for all of your help.
Marc Paré
Neil M. wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If that's the case why can't live connect be used in Mozilla so that
Communicator plugins can be used?
As a matter of fact, I have wondered this as well.
Live connect can't be used with plugins because
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
Having to register it? That is a big issue
You don't have to register it.
He's right on this one. I tried to install Netscape 6.2.1 on my
friend's new computer. Netscape will not open the first time
until you sign up with a Netcenter account. But my friend
could not
Just a test to see if the system is working. I havn't seen a new note
for fpour days now.
Howie
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
sorry, that was kinda harsh.. I meant to just say that you dont have to
go around removing code like a Hack when you can just hit the cancel
buttons to get out of activation..
Try installing Netscape 6 in a computer without an internet connection
like I did in my
I suggest the mozilla-win32-installer-sea.exe download because if you
download mozilla-win32-installer.exe, it will attempt to download the
rest from ftp.mozilla.org which current is being pounded by request,
probably by microsoft.com people trying to bog down the server. :)
--
Kyle
And it came to pass that David Grant wrote:
Is there any way to get Mozilla Mail to open URL links in a
different browser? This applies to Linux and Windows.
Thanks.
David Grant
No. Mail is a component of Mozilla, not a seperate program;
since Mozilla is all ready running, it will
Netscape Basher wrote:
PeEmm typed:
Red wrote:
We all know Bundy is a troll. However I am disappointed at the
behavior of Jay Garcia and the fact that Kyle Bundy has made some
points about Jay Garcia not knowing what he was talking about and
giving out bad answers. However, Bundy
And it came to pass that Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Kryptolus wrote:
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
I notice a lot of people that post in various places
saying https doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure
site etc etc and half the time its because they didnt
know that PSM needed to be installed. Why
Hi,
It seems the the dialogue box under:
Print... Properties... Gap from edge...
is not labelled correctly. The fields read:
Top: [ ] Bottom: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ]
when apparently they should be:
Top: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ] Bottom: [ ]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gunnm: Broken Angel
Hi,
just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany
( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem:
with the realease 0.9.8 I have no problems at all, 0.9.9 can't open the
site, it stays blank with no comment (but there is a lot of activity in
form of sending
Max Bentz wrote:
Hi,
just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany
( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem:
with the realease 0.9.8 I have no problems at all, 0.9.9 can't open the
site, it stays blank with no comment (but there is a lot of
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Neil M. wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If that's the case why can't live connect be used in Mozilla so that
Communicator plugins can be used?
As a matter of fact, I have wondered this as well.
Live connect can't be used
Howard M. Stark typed:
Just a test to see if the system is working. I havn't seen a new note
for fpour days now.
Howie
I noticed you are using Netscape's secure server to read this group. I
use the one from my provider and it works fine. The problem seems to be
on Netscape's secure
bico wrote:
I tried the full screen option with 0.9.9 just now, it's nice but I have
a problem on a Windows 98se box.
I run 2 monitors, a 15 lcd on the left running at 1024x768 which is the
main monitor running the task bar and a 19 monitor on the right running
at 1280x1024.
I always
Parish wrote:
According to the Release Notes for 0.9.9:
You now have the option of installing plugins in your Mozilla user
directory ($HOME/.mozilla/plugins on Unix). These plugins are loaded in
addition to those in your Mozilla install directory.
I take it that this means
\Documents
Christian Emig wrote:
Parish wrote:
According to the Release Notes for 0.9.9:
You now have the option of installing plugins in your Mozilla user
directory ($HOME/.mozilla/plugins on Unix). These plugins are loaded in
addition to those in your Mozilla install directory.
I take it that
tis embarrassing to see suntrust talk about standards. Just run
http://www.suntrust.com through http://validator.w3.org and it will
tell you about who's keeping to standars and who isn't.
Eric
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that Frank Sfalanga wrote:
According to this
hello,
i'm designing a page wich lay-out will completely been done in css...
don't mention the lay-out, it's just for checking out things...
the page in wich the problem occurs
http://islink.nl/paf/
the in the center positioned div (with a text about cascading
stylesheets in dutch) has the
The XSLT is run but you output xml in the null namespace. So the
result-document are not interpreted as html at all, but rather as plain XML.
To fix this either change
xsl:output method=xml
to
xsl:output method=html/
or
xsl:output/ (autodetect will do the trick for you)
to output html. Or
Kryptolus wrote:
Max Bentz wrote:
Hi,
just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany
( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem:
with the realease 0.9.8 I have no problems at all, 0.9.9 can't open the
site, it stays blank with no comment (but there
browser is very impressive, and I can't wait to see the progress that's
been made in Mozilla reflect in Netscape 6.x. I've been looking at the
new (that is, finally fixed) features in Mozilla, and I have a few brief
(mainly cosmetic) comments:
Regarding the mail notification... IT'S ABOUT
One other thing I forgot to mention (and also a way for me to mark my
thread as watched and actually be able to see it ;-)), It would be
incredibly useful if there were an option to make labeled messages bold
(as though they were unread mail). Talk about make it easy to spot!
Best regards,
Just downloaded Mozilla (Win32) 0.9.9. Has anyone had any problems
trying to drag a message to the Saved Message folder. I've tried it
several time but there is nothing in the Saved Message folder - no
message is saved. I had no problems with this feature in Mozilla 0.9.8.
Perhaps it's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
No problem here!
Yeh You-Ying wrote:
Hello,
Today I installed Mozilla 0.9.9 and had some test about Mail/News.
I found that attach as inline is not perfect as Mozilla 0.9.8+
(2002031008). The 0.9.9 just show strange
Hi all.
I am using moz 0.9.9 and I am having a problem with a java pluggin. I go
here: http://www.dslreports.com/stest?loc=2 to run a speed test for my
cable modem, it works fine with NS 4.79 but with moz it tells me to
download a pluggin. Anyway I download the pluggin using the software
WDA wrote:
Just downloaded Mozilla (Win32) 0.9.9. Has anyone had any problems
trying to drag a message to the Saved Message folder. I've tried it
several time but there is nothing in the Saved Message folder - no
message is saved. I had no problems with this feature in Mozilla 0.9.8.
Visit page with java applet (say http://www.javasoft.com). Click to
download plug-in. Download and install plug-in. Browser window reports
success. Restart Mozilla. Visit page with Java applet. No applet.
Plug-in download icon still there. What gives?
I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as
well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render
fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.
But, despite following the instructions carefully
On 03/12/2002 3:32 PM, kimji wrote:
Hi,
It seems the the dialogue box under:
Print... Properties... Gap from edge...
is not labelled correctly. The fields read:
Top: [ ] Bottom: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ]
when apparently they should be:
Top: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ] Bottom: [ ]
Hello,
I uninstalled .9.8 and loaded .9.9 tabbed browsing function is now
messed up
If I go to the preferences an uncheck the boxes for tabbed browsing a
single tab appears in the navigator, no addittional tabs appear. If I
check the boxes, the single tab disappears altogether.
Behaviour is
No one else sees this? It's fine in newsgroups, but in all my mail
accounts, the To address is in the Sender column. It's quite annoying as
I can't see who is sending me mail.
troy hakala wrote:
For several releases of Mozilla Mail, the Sender column in the list view
shows the recipient,
Richard wrote:
Hello,
I uninstalled .9.8 and loaded .9.9 tabbed browsing function is now
messed up
If I go to the preferences an uncheck the boxes for tabbed browsing a
single tab appears in the navigator, no addittional tabs appear. If I
check the boxes, the single tab disappears
Joao Rodrigues wrote:
I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as
well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render
fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.
But, despite following the instructions carefully
Just a test to see if the system is working. I havn't seen a new note
for fpour days now.
Howie
Same here. Which server are you connecting to? I'm on
secnews.netscape.com. Maybe I should change servers?
Is it possible to make Mozilla 0.99 to look like Netscape 4.75?
I think it is called Motif Look Feel.
It's really great that Moz now has a neat print preview, but has anyone
else noticed the following behavior? IMO these are really serious.
Try viewing a site like my.yahoo.com and then preview it. Why is only
one column shown at a time instead of the actual front page?
Going out of print
RTH wrote:
Hi all.
I am using moz 0.9.9 and I am having a problem with a java pluggin. I go
here: http://www.dslreports.com/stest?loc=2 to run a speed test for my
cable modem, it works fine with NS 4.79 but with moz it tells me to
download a pluggin. Anyway I download the pluggin using
Is there a special trick to getting the new Windows system tray mail
alert in 0.9.9 working?
I have been getting a lot of questions about Mozilla lately from my
computer user group. I use it on my machine with is the one usually
hooked up to the projector for our meetings. They seem to think it's
IE with a skin. I would like to do a full on 20 min talk about the
cool features of the
Kryptolus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Kryptolus wrote:
Max Bentz wrote:
Hi,
just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany
( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem:
with the realease 0.9.8 I have no
isu0 wrote:
Is it possible to make Mozilla 0.99 to look like Netscape 4.75?
I think it is called Motif Look Feel.
May be if you use Netscape 4.75 youll get the look and UI of Netscape 4.75.
And it came to pass that isu0 wrote:
Is it possible to make Mozilla 0.99 to look like Netscape
4.75? I think it is called Motif Look Feel.
The closest you'll get is to use the Classic theme.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
We don't morally censure you. We
I DONT BELIEVE YOU
MOST RECOMMENDED ADULT ENTERTAINMENT
FUCK ME TONIGHTIf you are a man looking for sex with married women - not just photos but REAL SEX - then you have to visit Sex2go. Over 100,000 women are waiting for a real man to fuck them hard; and more than 32,000
PeEmm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on
12 Mar 2002:
They
think that uttering a negative word about Mozilla is like peeing
at the Holy Bible.
Negative words are ok, for example:
Mozilla is slow at DHTML, is anything being done to fix this?
Not:
I've been considering upgrading from my Netscape 6.2.1 to Mozilla .99
for the speed improvements that I have been hearing about.
1) Is it as stable / problem free as my current Netscape installation?
2) Can I still access my Netscape WebMail account with it? (Important)
3) Is jumping from
Max Bentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002:
Maybe someone could please check this too, if the same problem
appears ? Or missed I something?
The problem is:
if (document.location.host != www.sparkasse-aachen.de)
document.location.host =
troy hakala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002:
No one else sees this? It's fine in newsgroups, but in all my mail
accounts, the To address is in the Sender column. It's quite
annoying as I can't see who is sending me mail.
Try deleting
Kryptolus wrote in message...
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https
doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the time
its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed.
Why isnt it installed by default?
At
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
