Lots of smiles watching that video. I learned that I don't shudder anymore at
the reminder of SMS 2.0 RTM or SP1.
ConfigMgr street cred: Upgraded a 1.1 instance to 1.2 in about 1996/7. Never
stopped. Although I admit I don't own CM personally anymore here, but my team
does! Ah, management!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 1:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Help! WSUS mai
We have a Premier case open for very similar issues. 60% of the clients never
finish scanning. We've been performing WSUS maintenance for 3 months with MSFT
guidance. Our WSUS is clean and shiny.
Engineer handed the case over to another engineer yesterday who suggested we
pull the Windows
According to current documentation you only get a few features with CMG. The
only ways to get full SCCM client functionality is IBCM or Remote Access.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of SCCM FUN
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 3:04 PM
To:
We're on the cutting edge of Intune hybrid and you, sir, are out on the razor's
edge. 1702 gives you AfW, we won't be there until End of quarter. :)
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Monday, May 1,
environments just saying that Hybrid wasn't as responsive
as Intune Web when it came to device wipes and such. Have you seen that?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Lindenfeld, Ivan
<ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com<mailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com>> wrote:
Hybrid. One pane of glass. Also we own EM
Hybrid. One pane of glass. Also we own EMS licenses for other reasons as well
as Intune.
Have staff trained on SCCM, easy to KT to the Intune stuff.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: Tuesday, January 24,
Do I have this right, conceptually? If we need to upgrade .Net Framework on
Windows 10, we need to wait for the update to be included in a rollup in the
Update stream?
We need .Net FW 4.6.2 on Win 10 1511 and are not prepared to upgrade the OS to
1607 to get it natively.
Thanks
[FNF Logo]
Setting up hybrid Intune is very doable, but seems like massive overkill for a
few Surface Hubs that are on Prem. Meraki doesn’t help?
You need a license for each user, and they can have up to 15 devices.
I don’t think there is any point in using Intune with SCCM for on premise only
Windows
I can't find any that are in that condition in our installation, but I guess it
could happen if multiple users signed into Intune Client on that one device ?
In some kind of troubleshooting situation?
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
was unable to compile the file SmsClient.mof
The error code is 80041002
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Thursday, 25 August 2016 12:07 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mai
probably should be seeing it.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Lindenfeld, Ivan
<ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com<mailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com>> wrote:
This is not the definitive answer OP is demanding, but our production 1511 site
is showing 1610 under Updates and Ser
This is not the definitive answer OP is demanding, but our production 1511 site
is showing 1610 under Updates and Servicing after running the Powershell script
to trigger it. All prerequisites have passed.
We are upgrading next Monday evening, so you will have an answer then! ☺
Ivan
We have an open MW pointed to a collection that server builders populate with
new servers. They then depopulate when done. Who am I kidding, we monitor the
collection loosely and do it for them.
Ivan Lindenfeld
Fidelity National
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Adding a couple of things I haven’t read in this thread…
We have 25,000 clients. SCCM is virtualized, as I imagine most sites are.
Clients are spread across 1,200 locations in the US. When the SQL team asked
us to put the SQL database in their cluster I was allergic. Not just hesitant.
Friggin' awesome. I love dumps like that. Been missing a lot of this.
Thanks, Marcum.
Ivan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:58 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE:
...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2016 10:25 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Client Cache Location and Si
um.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 11:51 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Client Cache Location and Size incorrect following upgrade
to 1511 and then 1602
Call Premier. This is a bug. There is no perman
?
Von: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] Im Auftrag von Lindenfeld, Ivan
Gesendet: Montag, 22. August 2016 21:31
An: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Betreff: RE: AW: [mssms] M
.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com><mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>]
On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Thursday, August 1
Evidently not.
First thing I would do is to look at the membership a different way, such as a
report (one in Software Distribution - Package and Program Deployment Status)
or SQL query, which are realtime. The Deployment Status is not live. It is
Summarized and the summarizations are
Seconded.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 2:21 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Windows 7 IE11 emulation mode changed to Edge
You need to use the IE Site List.
<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 11:51 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Client Cache Location and Size incorrect following upgr
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 11:51 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Client Cache Locat
Call Premier. This is a bug. There is no permanent solution as yet.
We have seen it twice in the lifecycle of SCCM, once in 2007, and right now,
1511. Very disappointed to hear it is not fixed in 1602 but based on the
timing of our report of the bug (with 2 other reports coming in that week
Our environment is somewhat different than yours, in the we don’t use IBCM.
However, have you considered that someone initiated a manual Windows Update at
the computer? I had this come up on Tuesday where SCCM was being blamed for
taking down the bandwidth at the remote office. I was able to
I couldn't solve for this chicken and egg scenario so I deploy IE11
prerequisites (including Enterprise Mode prereqs), IE11 then the regkeys for
Enterprise Mode in a task sequence.
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Kevin
message about it being OK and actually installed didn't (and isn't) going
from the client to the mp to the database?
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 1:34 PM, Lindenfeld, Ivan
ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com wrote:
I am troubleshooting a strange situation. 100 computers in one
I am troubleshooting a strange situation. 100 computers in one area of the
country show patch non-compliance. Upon investigation, they are out one patch,
the one in the Subject line.
As I trace the installation of the patch, I see that windowsupdate.log and
WUAHandler.log say it installed
Hire a consultant. Get a throat to choke. Make it a line item on the MA
balance sheet.
Why are you responsible for splitting SCCM and then (you imply) the half of it
you won’t own going forward? Sounds uncomfortable at best.
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:57 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] (OT) Vendor list for Ignite?
I have a colleague in the ITAM space wanting
I have a colleague in the ITAM space wanting to shop but needs to make sure
hunting will be rich. We don't see a vendor list on the Ignite web site.
It would go a long way toward justifying the trip.
Thanks for any pointers.
Ivan Lindenfeld
NOTICE: The
There are a few things that can be in play here, but a recent one we ran into
was a highly inefficient WSUS database. Had not maintained it for a while and
clients were timing out getting patch metadata and asking for a
retransmit...repeatedly.
Performing the built-in WSUS maintenance twice
Hi folks,
I did a deep dive into the frequency of update of HINV in the collection
columns recently. While I never proved a refresh for the summarization, it was
long enough that it made using those HINV dates not useful within about a week.
I did discover that the Policy Request column is
We are.
We are in the process of slowly rolling out IE11. 3008923 upgrades it to
11.0.15. If you are at the latest prior version this is 11.0.14.
For new installs and upgrades of IE11, Enterprise Mode no longer appears on the
Tools menu. We just implemented a list of production sites into
...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 4:13 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] KB3008923 you're gonna have a bad time
We are.
We are in the process of slowly rolling out IE11. 3008923 upgrades it to
11.0.15
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally!
Are you now on the run from the law?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf
of Lindenfeld, Ivan [ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com]
Sent: 21 November 2014 20:26
To: mssms
: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally!
I rest easy knowing you would still post on mssms if you were on the run.
-Original Message-
From: Lindenfeld, Ivan [ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2014 09:33 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: mssms
I like the Devolutions offering so much I gave them my company's money.
Ivan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Aakash Shah
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 3:07 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally!
Amazing.
1997, SMS 1.1 to 1.2 upgrade was my first introduction. First wife, just
before I married my actual wife. Still have both marriages.
Ivan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 9:50 AM
To:
I didn’t offer up my script since Microsoft made me promise not to share it.
Hemsell’s script is identical.
It will take a long time if you haven’t run it for a long time. It was 2 years
for us and it took about 14 hours.
It will run great when you are done.
Ivan
From:
We are much like Marable's setup.
SCCM Team: everything but patching
Security team: patching
We'll say 6 FTE's are involved since there are a few systems engineers around
the company that do their own packaging and deployment related to their apps.
Our scale is around 20K clients. Fortune
I use the ones from Now Micro, too. Powershell based.
I also use Roger’s tools. Thanks Roger!
Ivan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Dwayne Allen
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:39 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms]
the spiral of doom we were experiencing. :)
We had just done our WSUS cleanup the Friday before... so... bloated wsus from
no cleanup being run wasn't considered to be a contributing factor.
On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 3:47 PM, Lindenfeld, Ivan
ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf
Can you elaborate? What other ways did it go out previously?
Thanks,
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 1:35 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Unusually
We have another issue THIS month (WSUSPOOL keeps abending) but last month we
saw that traffic increase.
I opened a case with Premier and they had me do the cleanup on WSUS...it had
never been done in almost 2 years. Oops.
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Since maintenance windows are policy based, I don't think there is a way to
script an opening from the client. Am I right?
I'm just playing...
Ivan Lindenfeld
Manager, Enterprise Deployment/SCCM
Fidelity National Financial | Jacksonville, Florida
NOTICE: The
be used. So I have to ask, why are you planning a CAS?
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on
behalf of Lindenfeld, Ivan
ivan.lindenf
...@lists.myitforum.com on
behalf of Lindenfeld, Ivan
ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 10:36 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] MOF import fails
I was actually baiting you, Jason. :)
New Primary
] MOF import fails
Grabbing some popcorn now
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 12:17 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
3, 2014 at 3:21 PM, April Cook
uge...@gmail.commailto:uge...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't this why RBA in ConfigMgr was introduced?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Lindenfeld, Ivan
ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com wrote:
I was crossing over into hourly rates for Jason so I think
We are moving toward upgrading SCCM 2012 to R2. Our SCOM team won't be ready
to upgrade before we do SCCM, which is against the order prescribed by
Microsoft.
I cannot see why SCCM has a dependency on SCOM being first. Anyone with
experience able to enlighten me? We don't have any
ROFL. Cloudy with a chance of System Center
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:04 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises
I’ve
I imaging him as an introverted narcissist basking in the glow of all of the
attention but without the emotional tools to participate in the conversation.
Or maybe I am just trolling him.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Ewing, Scott L
Strong endorsement for Ola’s script. It’s so good our DBA’s stole it.
Ivan Lindenfeld
FNF Jacksonville
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of David O'Brien
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:22 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE:
I could use a sounding board.
Thanks,
Ivan Lindenfeld
Manager, Enterprise Deployment/SCCM
Fidelity National Financial | Jacksonville, Florida
NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or
confidential and may be privileged. If you are
...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:04 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Is anyone else attempting to work with IE11 Enterprise Mode?
I could use a sounding board.
Thanks,
Ivan Lindenfeld
Manager
Microsoft provides IE11 version 11.0.9600.17107 via direct download.
This is the minimum version that supports Enterprise Mode.
When I create a package with the IEAK the version that downloads is
11.0.9600.16428CO.
This does not support Enterprise Mode.
We intend to use Enterprise Mode.
Has
Look at c:\windows\windowsupdate.log to see if it finished or what the status
is.
I recently performed the same deployment.
Also, c:\windows\logs\cbs\cbs.log
I didn't know about the cbs.log until a few weeks ago.
Ivan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
I need to deploy IE11 in a mode where it doesn't go to the internet during
installation.
Based on my work so far, IE11 needs multiple hotfixes prior to deployment (or
you're gonna have a bad time).
As I dug deep into this, all but 3 are either in Software Update or are .cab
files that can be
, May 09, 2014 7:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM 2012 SP1 client won't install on Domain Controller
long shot but is remote registry enabled?
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Lindenfeld, Ivan
ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com wrote:
I added the site
client won't install on Domain Controller
there is no local admins on a DC. Only domain admins.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Lindenfeld, Ivan ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com
wrote:
Hi Folks. Bing-Fu or Technet is not helping. Here is my issue, hope
you can help…
SCCM 2012 SP1 CU3
Site Server
Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 2:42 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 SP1 client won't install on Domain Controller
I stand corrected. Linear thinker multitasking. Thanks, Todd.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad
Seem to have it setup correctly...nada.
Ivan Lindenfeld
Manager, Enterprise Deployment/SCCM
Fidelity National Financial | Jacksonville, Florida
NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or
confidential and may be privileged. If you are
I am having similar funniness. I have both %programfiles% and
%programfiles(x86) as paths for *.exe on separate entries.
I first thought I was having a client side SINV issue but I disproved that
yesterday.
I am trying to verify a deployment based on an .exe and I am showing 2000
missing or
Hi Robert,
I have two MP's in the same domain and they both appear in the nslookup list
that is a result of the command in your link.
SCCM 2012 SP1 CU3
I don't remember if I requested the second to be registered in DNS manually or
if it just did based on the checkbox. (Checkbox may not be
The symptom I see is the Client policy for workstations is set to No for
limiting BITS bandwidth. The applied policy as seen in GPResult has this set
to Yes with the remainder of the BITS settings set to default settings from
the Client settings. These settings may be the default for this
Thanks for this info. Is IE11 similarly endowed?
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Schwan, Phil
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:55 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: IE10 and the Troubles of
Trevor,
Curious as to why you killed CCMSETUP first? As a best practice just in case
it's running still from a previous attempt?
Thanks.
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014
One thing you'll need is to add RESETKEYINFORMATION=TRUE to the install
command line. This is from personal experience going from 2007 to 2012
clients. It was also recommended by a Sr. PFE recently which is to say it's
possibly a best practice.
The client install needs to forget the old
This is a SCOM alert that keeps popping. We checked
All certificates related to SCCM
On all site servers including the database servers
Data is flowing from all site roles to the database and back
SCCM 2012 SP1 CU3
SCOM 2012 SP1 (unknown CU)
SCOM Management Pack for SCCM 2012 RTM. My SCOM
=postst=145897
Mike D-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:15 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] The database
If I read your post well enough, which is debatable, I think it's all related
to the inability for the client to get to the new site, DP, MP, etc due to an
attempt to communicate with the wrong certificate.
Ivan Lindenfeld
Sr. Systems Engineer
Enterprise Deployment / SCCM
Fidelity National
We are somewhat interested in reporting on our display monitor population. In
looking around the internet, I found very little that looks like it effectively
collects this data so that it gets picked up by hardware inventory.
What is the state of the art on this topic?
Thanks. We have SCCM
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 2:40 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] State of the Art in collecting
It is my opinion as well that IBCM is hard to set up. We have aborted our
effort for now.
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:29 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE:
Matt,
Is multicast enabled on your network? It's been a few years since we attempted
this but I think there was also a DHCP or DNS setting that needed to be
changed/added.
It's not just SCCM setting unfortunately.
Ivan Lindenfeld
Sr. Systems Engineer
Enterprise Deployment / SCCM
Fidelity
I always ran the built in Asset Intelligence reports, but you have to plan
ahead to enable the feature.
They don't work well for accuracy, but for reporting Microsoft licenses to
Microsoft, as long as they are inaccurate in your favor, hey, you're using a
Microsoft product so they can't
We have a big complex environment. I think we're prepared. But we sure could
use some well wishes!
We already pre-staged the client to 18,000 PCs. That went well.
Is a troll for luck on topic?
Thanks in advance!
Ivan Lindenfeld
Sr. Systems Engineer
Enterprise Deployment / SCCM
Infrastructure - Windows Hosting
[cid:image002.gif@01CDF887.776259A0]
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 12:12 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms
] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 12:31 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Rolling with SCCM 2012 SP1 tonight
Many thanks.
Ivan Lindenfeld
Sr. Systems Engineer
Enterprise Deployment / SCCM
Fidelity National Financial
Update client upgrades. It
only works for Service Pack upgrades (I think).
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 2:39 PM
To: mssms
What is the consequence of not upgrading to WMF 3.0 on my clustered SQL Server
2008 R2 before upgrading SCCM 2012 to SP1?
Thanks.
Ivan Lindenfeld
Sr. Systems Engineer
Enterprise Deployment / SCCM
Fidelity National Financial | Jacksonville, Florida
/2012/11/21/configmgr-2012-ccmeval-exe-causing-client-corruption/
Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2014 5:55 PM
To: mssms
We saw that symptom with the November patches for about 200 servers. Went to
Microsoft for root cause. The Discovery/client push fixed them (on retry of
ccmsetup, the aggressive command line.)
No symptom so Premier de-prioritized it. No answer.
Possible these are computers where the
I discovered when trying to fix some clients that the CCMSETUP process invokes
a more aggressive command line upon retry.
I ran CCMSETUP manually. It failed due to WMI missing information. After 120
minutes CCMSetup automatically retried with these parameters and successfully
fixed the
Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:59 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Aggressive CCMSetup command line
I discovered when trying to fix some clients that the CCMSETUP process invokes
a more aggressive command line upon retry.
I
Scott,
Did you ever figure this out? We are stuck in a pattern of circular logic on
this one. Microsoft provides the standalone SkyDrive Pro installers but the
silent switches don't work. I found examples that support this on
social.microsoft.com.
The official answer seems to be to use the
Two related to Software Metering:
Summarize Software Metering File Usage Data
Summarize Software Metering Monthly Usage Data
CM12
Ivan Lindenfeld
Sr. Systems Engineer
Enterprise Deployment / SCCM
Fidelity National Financial
Jacksonville, Florida
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
I've got an HP ElitePad 900 to test with. I'm going to try to upgrade over
Windows 8 Pro on it. I'll post my results.
I do not do OSD, this will be manual.
Ivan Lindenfeld
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Ed Aldrich
Sent: Monday,
The article is (still) lacking detail.
For every computer with WMF 3.0 where you have CCMEVAL set to Repair if it
finds an issue (which is the default), if a WMI repair is initiated by the
CCMEVAL it will corrupt WMI.
This is because WMF 3.0 is makes fundamental and permanent changes to WMI
Users. Who needs software RIGHTNOWRIGHTNOW?
I would ignore them. OR remind then how long it used to take for the helpdesk
to sneakernet stuff.
There is some time built into the content download process even with 1E
deployed, so I wouldn't think anything lower than 15 would show any benefit.
). Torsten or Kenny would know off-hand.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 4:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms
I just deleted 5,000 SCNotify and _SCNotify files from the SCCM client logs
folder on a Citrix server. This was 300MB of files.
What can be done to mitigate this? It was not the first time, so I don't think
this is a one-off.
Thanks.
Ivan Lindenfeld
Fidelity National Financial
Jacksonville
ask for a good solution, just what could be done)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:38 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Or Software Update deployment state by date
I don't see built in reports for this.
I need to know which computers in a collection that installed patches today
(bonus: and rebooted.)
Thank you!
Ivan Lindenfeld
We ripped out Altiris in 2006/7 and installed SMS 2003. Then SCCM 2007 and
SCCM2012 we evaluated Landesk, in a very serious way. You can't beat the
ecosystem Microsoft has built around Office/SCCM/System Center. We have 27,000
clients.
Landesk is a good product. I have heard nothing buy
he see anything different?
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 2:42 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject
Latisha,
Look for duplicate objects in the console using collections.
select
SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client
from SMS_R_System where SMS_R_System.Name in (select
This is really odd. I proved through running procmon.exe that that IIS and
SMSEXEC.EXE were contending for files and folders in C:\SMS\CCM\Incoming.
I removed the MP, removed IIS, re-added both and it seems to have fixed it.
This server is dedicated as an MP.
I am watching PROCMON roll with
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
