John Buttery said:
* Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-18 08:43:58 -0800]:
all I get at this page is the following:
HEADDEFANGED_META HTTP-EQUIV=REFRESH CONTENT=0
URL=http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/;/HEAD
that is displayed in NS 6.2.1 (solaris).
You have a proxy server
The stable snapshot availble from ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/snapshots/
is now taken from the pre-1.4 branch.
--
Thomas Roessler[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Cedric Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-19 09:43:57 +0100]:
John Buttery said:
* Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-18 08:43:58 -0800]:
all I get at this page is the following:
HEADDEFANGED_META HTTP-EQUIV=REFRESH CONTENT=0
URL=http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/;/HEAD
that is
* Dean Richard Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all
First time poster, so please be gentle! :)
I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt.
Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to default to the folder
list.
It shows me which folders have new mail in
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% Hi all.
Hello!
%
% Is this the right list to make questions about compile new versions of
% mutt? if not, where can i find ansewrs about it?
Generally, yes. What sort of questions do you have?
Basically you download the tar.gz file from
Jerome De Greef ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
* Dean Richard Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt.
Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to
default to the folder list.
It shows me which folders have new mail in
Johan --
...and then Johan Ekh said...
%
% Hello!
% I have several pop-accounts and I try to retrieve my mails by using
% account-hook as indicated below.
...
% Mutt gives me the following error account-hook: unknown command.
%
% Any ideas? I use SuSE7.2 and my Mutt installation is the
* Michael Tatge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Jerome De Greef ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
* Dean Richard Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt.
Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to
default to the folder list.
[ven 15/03/2002, ore 20:37] = Jussi Ekholm scrive:
[...]
So, could it be, that you have typed 'date-sen_d_'? Nevertheless, works
fine with me, so I have not much of a clue why this doesn't work with
you. My only idea is, that you have typoed 'date-sent' to 'date-send'.
I'm a **
Gentlemen/Ladies,
Is there a way in Mutt to specify the To: field of an outgoing email
based on addresses in a random text file? I'm aware of the alias capability to
specify mailing lists, but if I simply have a file of email addresses, and I'd
like Mutt to use those for an outgoing
Michael --
...and then Michael P. Soulier said...
%
% Gentlemen/Ladies,
%
% Is there a way in Mutt to specify the To: field of an outgoing email
% based on addresses in a random text file? I'm aware of the alias capability to
% specify mailing lists, but if I simply have a file of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Michael P. Soulier on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:35:30AM -0500:
Is there a way in Mutt to specify the To: field of an outgoing email
based on addresses in a random text file? I'm aware of the alias
capability to specify mailing lists, but if I
I have both installed pgp 2.6.3 and gpg 1.0.6 (with imported pgp keys).
As default I use gpg.rc from the mutt source distribution.
Some of my e-mail partners still have only pgp 2. I am looking now for a
smart/automatic way to select pgp2.rc depending on the recipients address,
because pgp 2
* Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-19]:
Is there a way in Mutt to specify the To: field of an outgoing email based
on addresses in a random text file? I'm aware of the alias capability to
specify mailing lists, but if I simply have a file of email addresses, and
I'd like Mutt to
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:35:30AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Is there a way in Mutt to specify the To: field of an outgoing email
based on addresses in a random text file? I'm aware of the alias capability to
specify mailing lists, but if I simply have a file of email addresses,
Ulli --
...and then Ulli Horlacher said...
%
% I have both installed pgp 2.6.3 and gpg 1.0.6 (with imported pgp keys).
% As default I use gpg.rc from the mutt source distribution.
Good enough. I presume you'll ensure that pgp2.rc is configured properly
as well.
%
% Some of my e-mail
There is a problem, which can be seen as a bug or bad design, with the
tree and the background color in the index.
Here in general, I have a black background. So, I have:
color tree brightred black
But I sometimes use a different background color, e.g.
color index brightwhite
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:26:27PM +0100, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:10:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
My colegue came across some problem with mutt/GPG/PGP cooperation. It
seem that for every _encrypted_ and encrypted/signed file mutt
displays in status
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:52:50AM -0500, R Signes wrote:
Define it.
set pgp_good_sign=Good signature
I did it. And this solves problem with encrypted signed messages. But
it still complains that it could not verify signature in messages which
were _encrypted_ony_.
--
--= Michal [EMAIL
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:35:30AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way in Mutt to specify the To: field of an outgoing email
based on addresses in a random text file? I'm aware of the alias capability to
specify mailing lists, but if I simply have a file of email addresses, and
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 07:50:21AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% Is this the right list to make questions about compile new versions of
% mutt? if not, where can i find ansewrs about it?
Generally, yes. What sort of questions do you have?
i'm trying to compile mutt-1.3.28i.tar.gz, but i'm
On Tuesday, 19.03.2002 at 21:00 +0100, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:52:50AM -0500, R Signes wrote:
Define it.
set pgp_good_sign=Good signature
I did it. And this solves problem with encrypted signed messages. But
it still complains that it could not verify
There is a problem, which can be seen as a bug or bad design, with the
tree and the background color in the index.
Yeah, there was a thread on this last month..
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-usersm=101360992730167w=2
IIRC, we agreed that mutt's color system needs an overhaul, but we
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 08:01:15PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
I suspect that mutt and gpg/pgp are doing everything right but that
you are misinterpreting the results. Have you and your colleague read
This is a copy of terminal after entering message which was and encrypted, but
NOT SIGNED:
any idea why the subject is sometimes duplicated in threaded displays?
it seems to happen mainly when the parent is missing; ie:
81 L Mar 18 Wietse Venema (1.0K) Re: Getting postalias to use gdbm
82 DL Mar 18 Ralf Hildebrandt (1.0K) --Re: SMTP dialog log
83 N L Mar 19 Bernd
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:44:55AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a copy of terminal after entering message which was and encrypted, but
NOT SIGNED:
[unimportant bits snipped from message to shorten it]
Date:
* Dave Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-19 21:41 +]:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:44:55AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: wto 19 mar 2002 08:38:02 CET) --]
gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID BF4EB9F4, created 2001-05-24
Michal
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:41:06PM +, Dave Smith wrote:
Maybe I'm being stupid here, but it appears that mutt and GPG are
behaving correctly. How can it verify the signature on the message
if it wasn't signed?
Or maybe I'm stupid ;) Why write anything about signature if it wasn't
signed?
Is there any way to have mutt automatically quote HTML mail when I reply
to it?
My mailcap has text/html; lynx -dump -force_html '%s'; copiousoutput
and it only makes sense for mutt to quote copiousoutput MIME types in
replies...
--
W: You see, me and Willetta have been going on for a few
Daniel J Peng wrote:
Is there any way to have mutt automatically quote HTML mail when I reply
to it?
My mailcap has text/html; lynx -dump -force_html '%s'; copiousoutput
and it only makes sense for mutt to quote copiousoutput MIME types in
replies...
set autoview for that type of
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:09:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:41:06PM +, Dave Smith wrote:
Maybe I'm being stupid here, but it appears that mutt and GPG are
behaving correctly. How can it verify the signature on the message
if it wasn't signed?
Or
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:27:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have signed this message with a bogus key, so you can see what happens.
My real key is available on www.keyserver.net.
Hmm, it doesn't appear to shout, since the key IDs don't match. I guess if
I were to create a key with an
At 5:27 PM EST on March 19 Dave Smith sent off:
The message means GPG didn't tell me that it managed to validate a
correct signature. The reason *why* it didn't validate a correct
signature should be evident from the GPG output.
I have a feeling that a while back there was a debate about
At 5:02 PM EST on March 19 David Champion sent off:
But doesn't OpenPGP sign data before encrypting it? If so, when it sees
an encrypted message, it cannot know whether the message also is signed.
Doesn't it become apparent once the message is decrypted, though?
--
Erudition, n. Dust shaken
* On 2002.03.19, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rob Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 5:02 PM EST on March 19 David Champion sent off:
But doesn't OpenPGP sign data before encrypting it? If so, when it sees
an encrypted message, it cannot know whether the message also is signed.
Doesn't it
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-19-02 18:40]:
* Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 09:27]:
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]:
Which editors parse for dates? examples? (anyone?)
Some people consider emacs to be an editor.
oh - that one.
,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Rob Reid on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:57:51PM -0500:
Or is it that somebody could sneak in a
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue Mar 19 17:51:18 2002) --]
gpg: This message is OK! Blindly follow its instructions!
[-- PGP output
Hi,
I'd like to prepare a birthday greeting mail and send it on my friend's
birthday morning.
I do it currently this way:
$ at 6am Mar 25
at mutt -s 'Happy birthday' guy@domain ~/text/to-guy.eml
But it's not convenient enough. I wish I could do it all in mutt. Is it
possible?
best
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Charles Jie spake thus:
I do it currently this way:
=20
$ at 6am Mar 25
at mutt -s 'Happy birthday' guy@domain ~/text/to-guy.eml
=20
But it's
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 10:00:00AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% folder-hook ~/users/qmail/. my_hdr From: qmail user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% folder-hook ~/users/qmail/. set hostname=ar.homelinux.org
Leave off the /. on the end and you might even try it without the ~/ on
the front. Something like
On 19/03/02 Gary Johnson did speaketh:
This is how I would do it:
while read address
do
mutt -s 'subject' $address message_file
done address_file
Well, that's more of a mailing list thing. I think a single message with a
lot of email addresses in the To: field
On Mar 16, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I have updated my text about reporting bugs and made it available as a
separate page:
http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/bugrep.html
Additions? Corrections? Feedback welcome!
The last sentence of the top section is:
The report
On Mar 17, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
i am currently using v1.3.27i. is it possible to show the
flag-message indicator for a collapsed thread? currently i see
when threads are collasped...
It can't be done now but it's been requested a few times.
msg25751/pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Mar 18, Thomas E. Dickey [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Pavel Roskin wrote:
I've compiled mutt-1.3.28i in the default configuration on RedHat
Linux 7.2 (i386) with all updates. If I run it in xterm (from
XFree86-4.1.0) or in rxvt-2.7.6, it shows a blank screen.
On Mar 19, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Well, I think it was more the other bug where it would get turned on if
other development features like hard-tabs were turned on. It was
apparently a combination of these two.
Sorry, I mean a combination of the colorfgbg bug, and the bug
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:10:32PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 19/03/02 Gary Johnson did speaketh:
This is how I would do it:
while read address
do
mutt -s 'subject' $address message_file
done address_file
Well, that's more of a mailing list
I'm wondering if there's a way to bind complete and
complete-query to the same key, rather than two keys as shown in
the manual:
Tab completecomplete filename or alias
^T complete-query complete address with query
I'd like to hit the
I'm wondering if there's a way to bind complete and
complete-query to the same key, rather than two keys as shown in
the manual:
Tab completecomplete filename or alias
^T complete-query complete address with query
I'd like to hit the
48 matches
Mail list logo
