Any inputs on the correct format of IPv6 address that needs to be passed to
the following function?
Or is there a bug here?
*netsnmp_ds_set_string(NETSNMP_DS_LIBRARY_ID,NETSNMP_DS_LIB_CLIENT_ADDR_V6,effective_ipv6);*
We tried to pass the following format of IP address to the above function,
but
Hi
This query is regarding setting ipv6 source ip for traps.
*Query 1*
We are using this api
*netsnmp_ds_set_string(NETSNMP_DS_LIBRARY_ID,NETSNMP_DS_LIB_CLIENT_ADDR_V6,effective_ipv6);*
to set the source-ip.Currently we are passing the ipv6 address as 2001::1
(without enclosing in brackets
Hi,
I was reached with question about $SUBJ, that I am not sure, if it's possible.
Imagine this situation.
Someone have linux system, on which is disabled IPv6 support via grub file
(/etc/default/grub -> ipv6.disable=1). After reboot, this will cause following
error message by snmpd [
d version (5.7.2), and with a somewhat
>recent installation of the 5-8-patches branch.
Actually I do too :) I was mistaken when I stated that I did not see
ipAddressPrefix.
So If I want to get "interface name" to "ipv6 address" mapping, I need to
get
1. ifIndex = 2 from
IP-MIB:
Den 27-02-2020 kl. 18:40 skrev Michael Wu:
Dear Net-Snmp coders:
I am using net-snmp v5.8 with ipv6 enabled. Trying to get interface's
ipv6 addresses. I tried a couple of oids but could not figure out how to
map the ifindex to the ipv6 address assigned to the interfaces. All
interfaces
Dear Net-Snmp coders:
I am using net-snmp v5.8 with ipv6 enabled. Trying to get interface's ipv6
addresses. I tried a couple of oids but could not figure out how to map the
ifindex to the ipv6 address assigned to the interfaces. All interfaces have
both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses assigned.
1
*Question : Does netsnmp support IPv6 varbind as type IPAdress?*
1- *I "get bad notation" error when I am trying to send trap having IPv6
address with type IPAdress(a) as highlighted(in red italics underlined)*
[root@IWFVM00141 ~]# snmptrap -d -v 2c -c public 16.166.98.19
Thank you Bart. I will check.
Regards,
Pushpa.T
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:34 AM Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/29/18 9:34 PM, Pushpa Thimmaiah wrote:
> > Thank you. I will verify. Does the patch works for IPv6 too?
>
> Oops, I had overlooked that your example uses an IPv6
On 10/29/18 9:34 PM, Pushpa Thimmaiah wrote:
Thank you. I will verify. Does the patch works for IPv6 too?
Oops, I had overlooked that your example uses an IPv6 client address.
Can you verify whether the following (untested) patch helps (checked
in yesterday on the v5.8 and master branches
Hi Bart,
Thank you. I will verify. Does the patch works for IPv6 too?
Regards,
Pushpa. T
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:27 AM Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 09:52 +0530, Pushpa Thimmaiah wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I am using option 'clientAddr' with IPv6 addre
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 09:52 +0530, Pushpa Thimmaiah wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am using option 'clientAddr' with IPv6 address and noticed that it is not
> working.
> so I applied patch
> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/33064273/ on 5.7.3 but It
> seems
Hi All,
I am using option 'clientAddr' with IPv6 address and noticed that it is
not working.
so I applied patch
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/33064273/ on 5.7.3 but
It seems not working.
Kindly let me know if I am missing any configurations.
Eg:
linux machine has
On 08/14/18 08:56, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> As one can see on
>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/BVanAssche87257/net-snmp
>> the build of the Net-SNMP master branch
>> passes for MSVC-2017,
>
> Really? From:
>
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/BVanAssche87257/net-snmp/buil
ig type:release
[00:00:28] SDK:enabled
[00:00:28] Link type: dynamic
[00:00:28] Prefix / Destdir: c:/usr
[00:00:28] OpenSSL:enabled
[00:00:28] IPv6 transport: enabled
[00:00:28] winEx
On 08/13/18 05:37, Gisle Vanem via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
It's been > 3 years since I've compiled using MinGW.
Now I'm sticking more to clang-cl and MSVC and notice
the support for MSVC wrt. to IPv6 is in a real (excuse my
French) shitty state. E.g. the '{ }' s
Hello list.
Just subscribed; my first message on the Net-SNMP list in
several years.
It's been > 3 years since I've compiled using MinGW.
Now I'm sticking more to clang-cl and MSVC and notice
the support for MSVC wrt. to IPv6 is in a real (excuse my
French) shitty state. E.g
>>
>> SNMP Versions Supported:1 2c 3
>> Building for: linux
>> Net-SNMP Version: 5.8.pre1
>> Network transport support: Callback Unix Alias TCP UDP TCPIPv6 UDPIPv6
>> IPv4Base SocketBas
lback Unix Alias TCP UDP TCPIPv6 UDPIPv6
> IPv4Base SocketBase TCPBase UDPIPv4Base UDPBase IPv6Base
>
> How did you build your net-snmp? Is there any chance that you built the
> agent/ subdirectory without IPv6 support, and the snmplib/ subdirectory
> with IPv6 support? That would caus
SocketBase TCPBase UDPIPv4Base UDPBase IPv6Base
How did you build your net-snmp? Is there any chance that you built the
agent/ subdirectory without IPv6 support, and the snmplib/ subdirectory
with IPv6 support? That would cause “rocommunity6” to not work but
“agentaddress udp6:…” would work.
Bill
nfig, and accordingly it
does not support community access for IPv6.
Are you sure you are running the version compiled with --enable-ipv6?
What other config options did you use?
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - [email protected]
The purpose of computing is insight, no
Seems like --enable-ipv6 is not enough to make SNMPv2 work with IPv6 since:
# ./snmpd -H 2>&1 | grep community
trapsink host [community] [port]
trap2sinkhost [community] [port]
informsink host [community] [port]
trapco
I am sure about the compilation with --enable-ipv6 because it works with
snmp v3
# snmpget -v 3 -u Admin -a MD5 -A Admin-00 -l authNoPriv 172.27.42.15
MPBC-1RU-MIB::mpbc1RUNEID.0 -Oqv
"VERSA_199"
# snmpget -v 3 -u Admin -a MD5 -A Admin-00 -l authNoPriv
[fe80::6eff:beff:fe02:d0%eth0] MP
nfig, and accordingly it
does not support community access for IPv6.
Are you sure you are running the version compiled with --enable-ipv6?
What other config options did you use?
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - [email protected]
The purpose of computing is insight, no
Hi Simon,
Read
https://serverfault.com/questions/242013/difference-between-link-local-and-global-link-addresses-in-isatap/242014
Regards
Anders
Den ons 24 jan. 2018 02:13Simon Chamlian skrev:
> Since there is no reply, let me ask a different question:
>
> Was anyone able to use
Since there is no reply, let me ask a different question:
Was anyone able to use IPv6 with SNMPv2?
IPv4
# snmpget -v 2c -c public 172.27.42.199 MPBC-1RU-MIB::mpbc1RUNEID.0
MPBC-1RU-MIB::mpbc1RUNEID.0 = STRING: "VERSA_199"
works fine
IPv6
# snmpget -v 2c -c pu
h
> implement the EGP". Can you find a system that implements EGP? (Hint: the
> last one was probably turned off in the 1990s)
>
> #
>> # IPV6
>> #
>>
>> ipv6IfTableLastChange OBJ
find a system that implements EGP? (Hint: the
last one was probably turned off in the 1990s)
#
> # IPV6
> #
>
> ipv6IfTableLastChange OBJECT-TYPE1.3.6.1.2.1.55.1.4.0 - not implemented
> ipv6IfIndex
1.3.6.1.2.1.8 - not implemented
#
# IPV6
#
ipv6IfTableLastChange OBJECT-TYPE1.3.6.1.2.1.55.1.4.0 - not implemented
ipv6IfIndex OBJECT-TYPE 1.3.6.1.2.1.55.1.5.1.1 - not implemented
ipv6IfReasmMaxSize
I got the Ipv6 working finally with SNMP v3. I had to add:
agentaddress udp:161
agentaddress udp6:161
in snmpd.conf.
Now the problem is SNMPv2 that does not work with IPv6.
I added:
rocommunity6 public
rwcommunity6 private
but these tokens are not recognized
d the agent by enabling IPv6 ( --enable-ipv6).
>
> The agent is working fine but don't seem to be able to use IPv6.
>
> Example:
>
> # snmpget -v 3 -u Admin -a MD5 -A Admin-00 -l authNoPriv 172.27.42.199
> MPBC-1RU-MIB::mpbc1RUNEID.0 -Oqv
> "TestNew"
>
> works
Hi,
Just recompiled the agent by enabling IPv6 ( --enable-ipv6).
The agent is working fine but don't seem to be able to use IPv6.
Example:
# snmpget -v 3 -u Admin -a MD5 -A Admin-00 -l authNoPriv 172.27.42.199
MPBC-1RU-MIB::mpbc1RUNEID.0 -Oqv
"TestNew"
works fine.
In Ipv6:
Hi Coders,
I need details on how to configure */var/net-/snmp/snmpd.conf* to set IPV6
IP address as a target destination so that the snmp master agent can
forward the traps to the configured IPV6 target destination.
We have the below version of net-snmp with RHEL 7.1 :-
*net-snmp-agent-libs
Den 05-08-2015 kl. 11:01 skrev Spandana Kadiri:
> I used Net-SNMP 5.7.3 source and created an application that receives traps.
> But when a V1 trap with IPV6 address in agent-addr field arrives,
> sess_snmp_read() is dropping the packet due to parse error.
> The following error is gi
Hi,
I used Net-SNMP 5.7.3 source and created an application that receives traps.
But when a V1 trap with IPV6 address in agent-addr field arrives,
sess_snmp_read() is dropping the packet due to parse error.
The following error is given:
*Bad parse of ASN.1 type (parse string length 16 too large
On Thu, 28 May 2015 18:41:04 +0530 Ajit wrote:
AA> I have successfully configured and run snmptrapd to capture
AA> snmp v2 and v3 traps. But, the agent_addr field from snmp_pdu
AA> doesn't contain ip address in case of ipv6. So, How can I get
AA> the ip address ?
What release a
Hi,
I have successfully configured and run snmptrapd to capture snmp v2 and v3
traps. But, the agent_addr field from snmp_pdu doesn't contain ip address
in case of ipv6. So, How can I get the ip address ?
Also, is there any way to capture the traps whithout using engine id ?. It
gives me &qu
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:11:32 +0530 Rizwan wrote:
RA> Under IPv6 environment, sent snmptrap after setting clientaddr in
RA> snmp.conf, It is sent from another interface.
RA> [...]
RA> I looked into IPv4 code and feel like same code is missing under IPv6
RA> section.
Yes, I'd
Hi all,
Under IPv6 environment, sent snmptrap after setting clientaddr in
snmp.conf, It is sent from another interface.
Test Details.. (*net-snmp-5.7.2.1)*
[root@cghvhp1 ~]# cat /etc/snmp/snmp.conf
clientaddr 2001:ccc1::2
[root@cghvhp1 ~]#
[root@cghvhp1 snmp]# ifconfig eth3
eth3 Link
Hello,
could, please, someone sched light on how to get IPv6 addressess list
from FreeBSD interfaces. It's just not working and the code claims that
this feature is supported only on Linux.
Thank you.
-
s:/root # pkg_info | grep snmp
net-snmp-5.7.2_3An extendable SNMP implementation
12.07.2013 1:38, Niels Baggesen пишет:
> Den 09-07-2013 00:02, Alexander Kalashnikov skrev:
>> Thank you for pointing me out.
>> I was speaking about how to get IPv6 address list from all interfa
Den 09-07-2013 00:02, Alexander Kalashnikov skrev:
> Thank you for pointing me out.
> I was speaking about how to get IPv6 address list from all interfaces by
> only using SNMP.
Using the current V5-7-patches or master branch, on FreeBSD 9:
> $ snmpwalk nba-fbsd9 ipAddressPre
Hello Niels,
Thank you for pointing me out.
I was speaking about how to get IPv6 address list from all interfaces by
only using SNMP.
08.07.2013 19:20, Niels Baggesen пишет:
> Den 07-07-2013 13:02, Alexander Kalashnikov skrev:
>> could, please, someone sched light on how to get IPv6 a
Den 07-07-2013 13:02, Alexander Kalashnikov skrev:
> could, please, someone sched light on how to get IPv6 addressess list
> from FreeBSD interfaces. It's just not working and the code claims that
> this feature is supported only on Linux.
I don't quite know what data you are l
Hello,
could, please, someone sched light on how to get IPv6 addressess list
from FreeBSD interfaces. It's just not working and the code claims that
this feature is supported only on Linux.
Thank you.
--
This S
Hi Magnus,
Thanks for the input.
Will get back to you after testing .
Thanks
Giridhar
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Fromreide [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 3:33 AM
To: AR, Giridhar
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IPV6
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:43 +, AR, Giridhar wrote:
> ...
>
> But select system call is getting timedout for ipv6 address, Due to
> this traps are not received.
> timeout is set to 5 seonds, its code looks like
I assume the following is running inside of an infinite loop,
Den 02-03-2013 14:51, Claus Klein skrev:
> I noticed that on my macbook, there is no ipv6 MIBII table available
> from snmpd:
>
> for m in $MIBTABLES ; do build/apps/snmptable -Cibw 123 -m ALL -M ./
> mibs -v3 -u clausklein -l noAuthNoPriv localhost $m ; done
> IP-FORWARD-MIB::
1390898 0 894438 0 0
fw04078 0 0 0 0 0
I noticed that on my macbook, there is no ipv6 MIBII table available
from snmpd:
for m in $MIBTABLES ; do build/apps/snmptable -Cibw 123 -m ALL -M ./
mibs -v3 -u clausklein -l noAuthNoPriv localhost $m
On Mar 2, 2013, at 3:44 AM, Niels Baggesen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:29:40AM -0500, Bill Fenner wrote:
>> What do you think about updating the "old" support to use
>> ipCidrRouteTable, since ipRouteTable has been obsolete since 1997, and
>> dropping support for ipRouteTable?
>
> It isn
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:29:40AM -0500, Bill Fenner wrote:
> What do you think about updating the "old" support to use
> ipCidrRouteTable, since ipRouteTable has been obsolete since 1997, and
> dropping support for ipRouteTable?
It isn't that big a deal to add ipCidrRouteTable as a primary fall
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 08:29 +, AR, Giridhar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are not able to receive traps on ipv6 address in my application.
> Our application is not able to open the Traplistener on IPv6 on Suse
> SLES 11, Redhat 5.6 and Windows Server 2008 R2.
> We have set the pr
Hello,
We are not able to receive traps on ipv6 address in my application.
Our application is not able to open the Traplistener on IPv6 on Suse SLES 11,
Redhat 5.6 and Windows Server 2008 R2.
We have set the preferred address as IPV6. Port 162 is not getting banded to
IPV6 address.
The think
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Niels Baggesen wrote:
> Den 23-02-2013 20:54, Claus Klein skrev:
>> is it planed to extend snmpnetstat to show ipv6 address info, ipv6
>> routing table entries, and ipv6 active sockets info too?
>>
>> It seems that the current version
Den 23-02-2013 20:54, Claus Klein skrev:
> is it planed to extend snmpnetstat to show ipv6 address info, ipv6
> routing table entries, and ipv6 active sockets info too?
>
> It seems that the current version show only the ipv4 related infos from
> mib2 tables.
A couple of months ago
Hi all,
is it planed to extend snmpnetstat to show ipv6 address info, ipv6
routing table entries, and ipv6 active sockets info too?
It seems that the current version show only the ipv4 related infos
from mib2 tables.
//Regards
Claus
I think parts of my last message were cut off. I'll try again.
We are in the process of updating our agent/MIB to support both IPv4 and IPv6
addresses. As well as the agent itself,
our proprietary MIB specifies a number of external IP addresses e.g. the
address of a syslog client. Looki
We are in the process of updating our agent/MIB to support both IPv4 and IPv6
addresses. As well as the agent itself, our proprietary MIB specifies a number
of external IP addresses e.g. the address of a syslog client. Looking at the
ways to specify addresses, there seems to be the approach
Hi,
I am using net-snmp 5.6.2 version on Linux system. Need information about
ipIfStatsTable of IP-MIB.
Earlier I posted a thread related to IP-MIB & UDP-MIB, some one told to see
all the tables (including ipifStatsTable) we need to enable ipv6.
I enabled ipv6 using ( --enable-ipv6 ) in
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:42:38 +0200, Martin Knappe
>>>>> said:
MK> I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
MK> connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
MK> I was not able to:
Did you run co
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Martin Knappe wrote:
> I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
> connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
No.
> I was not able to:
>
> 1) set up the snmp-agent to listen on v
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Steve Friedl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Martin Knappe wrote:
> > I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
> > connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
> &
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Martin Knappe wrote:
> I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
> connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
> I was not able to:
>
> 1) set up the snmp-agent to listen on v6-addresses
I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
I was not able to:
1) set up the snmp-agent to listen on v6-addresses and respond to requests
2) send snmp traps with snmptrap or from within my own code
On 19 August 2011 10:32, xhao wrote:
> Anyone knows can snmptrap v2 support ipv6?
Yes.
As long as the toolkit has been compiled with IPv6 support,
you should be able to use all three versions (v1, v2c and v3)
and all SNMP commands (get*, set, trap and inform) over IPv6
D
Anyone knows can snmptrap v2 support ipv6?
--
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
the hassle out of deploying and managing
I have upgraded to current git version. Now the ipv6 entries are ready
filled.
But "make test" fails for 9 test cases!
This was the requested part of config.log:
configure:17870: checking for mib2_ipIfStatsEntry_t
configure:17870: result: no
configure:17900: checking ipv6
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:26:58 +0200 Claus wrote:
CK> while working on my UBUNTU linux system with net-snmp V5.7 I missed most
CK> of the IPv6 configuration at the MIBII if, ip, and route-tables.
CK> So I tested the the net-snmp V5.6 with the same configuration and it
CK> works fi
Hi,
while working on my UBUNTU linux system with net-snmp V5.7 I missed most
of the IPv6 configuration at the MIBII if, ip, and route-tables.
So I tested the the net-snmp V5.6 with the same configuration and it
works fine!
I noted too that there are problems to load the installed mibs with
Hi,
We want to use this library for IPV6 support of our product.
How to use it?
Regards,
S.M.BASHA.
--
10 Tips for Better Web Security
Learn 10 ways to better secure your business today. Topics covered
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:29:35AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:22:16 +0100, Magnus Fromreide
> > said:
>
> MF> * Split DTLSUDPDomain
>
> FYI, I think this is a bad idea... Though it wouldn't hurt (if I'm
> predicting what you want to do correctly), it'd actual
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:22:16 +0100, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> * Split DTLSUDPDomain
FYI, I think this is a bad idea... Though it wouldn't hurt (if I'm
predicting what you want to do correctly), it'd actually be a fair
amount of work for a short-term gain. It's expected that event
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 23:09 +, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 17 March 2011 19:23, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:59:14PM -0400, Lee wrote:
> >> I finally figured out that I needed the "--enable-ipv6" configure
> >> option to build net
On 17 March 2011 19:23, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:59:14PM -0400, Lee wrote:
>> I finally figured out that I needed the "--enable-ipv6" configure
>> option to build net-snmp with IPv6 support. It would be nice if
>> configure trie
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:59:14PM -0400, Lee wrote:
> I finally figured out that I needed the "--enable-ipv6" configure
> option to build net-snmp with IPv6 support. It would be nice if
> configure tried to enable IPv6 by default and disabling it required a
> "--di
I finally figured out that I needed the "--enable-ipv6" configure
option to build net-snmp with IPv6 support. It would be nice if
configure tried to enable IPv6 by default and disabling it required a
"--disable-ipv6" option
If it makes a difference, source code was 5.6.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 02:17:48PM -0800, Tarun Kumar wrote:
> 2. Now when I run with
> #snmpd udp6:161 -L -f -d -Dall
This look very strange:
> 2011-03-04 14:19:46 tdomain: tdomain_transport_full("snmp", " udp6:161", 1,
> "[NIL]", "[NIL]")
> 2011-03-04 14:19:46 trace: find_tdomain(): snmp_tr
Hi,
I am trying to work with net-snmp on ipv6. I have done all the required steps
to make it work but somehow it is still not working.
Here are the steps which I did:
1. Configured with ipv6 options:
--with-mib-modules="mibII/ipv6 host notification snmpv3mibs" \
--wi
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:38:04 +0200, Niels Baggesen
> said:
NB> I count +3 (my self, Wes, Magnus), and two abstain (Dave and Bart), so I
NB> will go ahead and commit it when I have got the proper autoconf tools in
NB> place :-)
Please do! I just got the rest of my plate cleared and
Den 28-09-2010 15:20, Niels Baggesen skrev:
> IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d rewrite.
> The following patch re-enables it.
I count +3 (my self, Wes, Magnus), and two abstain (Dave and Bart), so I
will go ahead and commit it when I have got the proper autoconf to
> Yes, and the (frightening) result is that --enable-ipv6 is silently
> ignored. I could fear that this means that IPv6 has not been compiled on
> the BSD platforms for quite some time. (I don't have a BSD system handy
> any more, but I assume that they use use this generic br
Den 29-09-2010 18:02, Wes Hardaker skrev:
> I agree... the issue is that the current symbol being checked for in
> the if statement doesn't match the symbol that is actually being set
> previously.
Yes, and the (frightening) result is that --enable-ipv6 is silently
ignored. I c
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:51:06 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> There is only one place mentioning
MF> ac_cv_have_struct_sockaddr_in6_sin6_addr in the configure script
MF> (the one Niels is removing) but there is code to set
MF> ac_cv_member_struct_sockaddr_in6_sin6_addr so I'd say it
On 28 September 2010 14:20, Niels Baggesen wrote:
> IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d rewrite.
> The following patch re-enables it.
My main concern about this patch is that it amends the configure script,
and hence potentially affects all builds, regardl
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 17:33 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Niels Baggesen
> wrote:
> IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d
> rewrite.
> The following patch re-enables it.
>
>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Niels Baggesen
wrote:
> IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d rewrite.
> The following patch re-enables it.
>
> --- configure.d/config_project_ipv6_types (revision 19393)
> +++ configure.d/config_project_ipv6_types
IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d rewrite.
The following patch re-enables it.
--- configure.d/config_project_ipv6_types (revision 19393)
+++ configure.d/config_project_ipv6_types (working copy)
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
#endif
Thanks Dave ...
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 21 July 2010 14:16, Manjit wrote:
>
>> Yes, i have configured the ipv6.
>> ./configure --with-mib-modules="mibII/ipv6"
>>
>
> That includes support for the IPv6 MIB modules.
> It does not include support
Yes, i have configured the ipv6.
./configure --with-mib-modules="mibII/ipv6"
make
make install
then i run the snmptrapd from /usr/local/sbin :
[r...@localhost sbin]# ./snmptrapd -c snmptrapd.conf -f -Lo udp6:162
getaddrinfo: udp6 Name or service not known
couldn't open udp6
On 21 July 2010 14:16, Manjit wrote:
> Yes, i have configured the ipv6.
> ./configure --with-mib-modules="mibII/ipv6"
That includes support for the IPv6 MIB modules.
It does not include support for SNMP over IPv6 as a transport mechanism.
$ ./configure --help
:
On 21 July 2010 11:27, Manjit wrote:
> I want to run snmptrapd to accept traps coming from agent in IPV6.
> Please provide me the command used for that.
> I am trying the below command but it is failing:
> [r...@101/udp sbin]# ./snmptrapd -d -c snmptrapd.conf -f -Lo udp6:162
Did you
Hi All,
I want to run snmptrapd to accept traps coming from agent in IPV6.
Please provide me the command used for that.
I am trying the below command but it is failing:
[r...@101/udp sbin]# ./snmptrapd -d -c snmptrapd.conf -f -Lo udp6:162
getaddrinfo: udp6 Name or service not known
couldn't
On 4 May 2010 14:00, Ron Bets wrote:
> Thanks. I am not tied specifically to the 5.4.x stream. My main requirement
> is support for
> IPv6 transport on Windows, Solaris, and Linux. Would I be better off with a
> different release?
I've just put together the latest (hop
tting me as far as I am now. I hope I can proceed with fewer difficulties
now.
Cheers,
Ron
--
From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: May 4, 2010 11:48 AM
To: Ron Bets
Cc: Net SNMP Coders ([email protected])
Subject: Re: Problems building 5.2.4.1 with
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
> Thanks. I am not tied specifically to the 5.4.x stream. My main
> requirement is support for IPv6 transport on Windows, Solaris, and Linux.
> Would I be better off with a different release? I only selected 5.4.2.1
> becaus
Thanks. I am not tied specifically to the 5.4.x stream. My main requirement
is support for IPv6 transport on Windows, Solaris, and Linux. Would I be
better off with a different release? I only selected 5.4.2.1 because the
readme mentioned that 5.4 finally support IPv6 on Solaris.
I have
me to update both
> libraries and make corresponding changes, if any, to our s/w, including
> enabling IPv6 transport. Hopefully I won't run in to similar problems when
> I do the Solaris (SPRO) and Linux builds ;-)
>
One way to make sure that MSVC 6 uses the PSDK headers during a batch bui
ork.
Still, I think I might be able to proceed with the rest of my task now. We
have an old legacy product that used link with an old version of OpenSSL
(0.9.8b) and NetSnmp (5.2.2), and it has fallen on me to update both libraries
and make corresponding changes, if any, to our s/w, includin
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
> Thanks again. I had noticed that in the readme, and the project is
> apparently attempting to link against the open ssl lib, but there seems to
> be an additional external dependency that is not met. Here is an example of
> the actual linker er
[email protected])
Subject: Re: Problems building 5.2.4.1 with IPv6 support on Windows
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
Thanks. The PSDK include directory does come before the VC98 include dirs. I
*think* I was successful building the libs from the IDE, but the errors persist
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
> Thanks. The PSDK include directory does come before the VC98 include dirs.
> I *think* I was successful building the libs from the IDE, but the errors
> persist from the cmd line. However, when I try to build an executable,
> e.g., snmpwalk, I
1 - 100 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
