I can tell you that there are two separate providers. A 64-bit provider and a
32-bit provider. If you need to use the 32-bit provider on a 64-bit OS, you
have to do some extra configuration work.
(I remember this coming up in a SCRUM meeting, but it wasn't my part of the
project, I didn't pay
These solutions look very intriguing. I'll probably pick up one of their
AP devices.
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
Ya, at the time my primary
No, as long as there were no issues with the promotion of this machine to
a DC and you aren't seeing any issues with replication, you can do it any
time. No need to wait.
Chris Bodnar, MCSE, MCITP
Technical Support III
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life
Great, thanks Chris
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: 11 January 2012 14:20
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Changing Schema Master
No, as long as there were no issues with the promotion of this machine to a DC
and you aren't seeing any issues
Thanks!
Those docs will be revised soon as TLS 1.0 has also been cracked. (My ancient
server does not yet use TLS 1.1, which is currently still secure.)
Now to deal with the TLS Renegotiation...
I found a Citrix patch (PSE450R06W2K3030). Now this is where inheriting a
Citrix system comes to
Use either license server 11.6.1 or better 11.9. 11.9 may require you to
return, reallocate and re download your license file(s). But that is a 2
minute project at worst. 1.9 is required for XenApp 6.5 and XenDesktop 5.5
(and maybe 5.0) as Citrix has implemented new licensing features. 11.9
There's the Windows Installer Cleanup tool, that may help (or not)
Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:34:41
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin
I think it's more to do with leftovers than anything else - add/remove seems
clean in that there is nothing left from GFI or Sunbelt in the list and there
no errors uninstalling, but Avira seems convinced there is something left.
From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 11
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
It's a two-minute project FOR YOU! :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IIS 6.0 Security
Use
Process Explorer and Process Monitor may help then
On 11 January 2012 15:51, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote:
I think it’s more to do with leftovers than anything else – add/remove
seems clean in that there is nothing left from GFI or Sunbelt in the list
and there no errors
Search the registry for Vipre and/or Sunbelt. Perhaps GFI but that's
likely to return random hits.
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 7:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Uninstalling Vipre?
I think it's more to do with leftovers
I wouldn't wait much. as long as Repadmin, DCdiag and the EventViewer are
clear it's a GO for me.
~d
From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Changing Schema Master
Hi All,
I wonder if you
Navigating Citrix's licensing website is less than easy the first few
times. However, like many dark arts, it becomes easier.
On 11 January 2012 15:54, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
** **
It’s a two-minute project FOR YOU! J
** **
Regards,
**
I think we're sorted. Doesn't look like Vipre was the culprit and it was a
corrupt Avira install, which we've now sorted.
Paul
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: 11 January 2012 16:01
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Uninstalling Vipre?
Search the registry for Vipre
Well, this is where I got stalled yesterday...
First, my system is so old that it still says Presentation Server, and it is
4.5. How does one determine the version of license server?
In my assorted Citrix apps and consoles, I cannot find license server version
information.
If I go to the
http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/lic-find-by-version/lic-find-doc-by-version-c.html
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Richard McClary
richard.mccl...@aspca.orgmailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org
The License Server will be set in Farm Properties. Log onto that server and
open the Licensing Console, then observe the version
On 11 January 2012 16:43, Richard McClary richard.mccl...@aspca.org wrote:
Well, this is where I got stalled yesterday…
** **
First, my system is so old that
Did you reboot between the uninstall the reinstall? It's possible
something needs cleaning upon the boot-up process.
Sean Rector, MCSE
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Uninstalling
That is technically true but not 100% accurate. While you CAN set the license
server at the farm level (which is preferred), you CAN also set each server to
use its own license server (which is stupid IMNSHO).
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
Thanks! They do not make it easy (at least, WAY BACK in 4.5 they didn't).
Any issues in upgrading from 11.3 to 11.6?
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IIS 6.0 Security
I am not aware of any issues when upgrading from 11.3 to 11.6 or 11.9.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Richard McClary
richard.mccl...@aspca.orgmailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org
Reply-To: NT Issues
Thanks...
Well, you did mention that 11.9 may then require a license file re-load.
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IIS 6.0 Security
I am not aware of any issues when upgrading from 11.3 to 11.6 or
May require a reload if you will be using XenApp 6.5 and or XenDesktop 5.5.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Richard McClary
richard.mccl...@aspca.orgmailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org
Reply-To: NT Issues
This article says Microsoft Visual Studio(r) 2008 - The software is required
_before_ you can proceed to Step 1. Step 1 is at the very top. Taken literally
(you know, like computers do) it would indicate you need to install VS 2008
before installing .NET 3.5. but VS 2008 REQUIRES .NET.
That is technically true but not 100% accurate
Somehow this reminds me of the joke about a plane flying around a Microsoft
hi-rise. Pilot yells to someone in the building I'm lost, can you tell me
where I am?. Reply: In a plane
Technically true but not real useful.
From: Webster
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
This article says “Microsoft Visual Studio® 2008 - The software is required
_before_ you can proceed to Step 1”. Step 1 is at the very top. Taken
literally (you know, like computers do) it would indicate you need to
install
I remember my very first CD-ROM drive. All the use and installation (and
drivers) were on a CD.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: LOL.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM,
Wasn't that on the box for one of the first Lotus 1-2-3 packages? I.e.
You must agree to the enclosed license agreement before opening the
package.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com http://www.carlwebster.com/
On 1/11/12 12:57 PM, Ben
Still common. And still silly.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: LOL.
Wasn't that on
Anyone else seeing this?
After installing 2585542 on Windows 7, (32 or 64) users can no longer
access some https sites.
page cannot be displayed
.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage
Yes. It's being widely reported.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: KB2585542 stops access to
Hmm.. This is listed as a known issue for KB2643584
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Not for 3585542. However, for 2643584:
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/window-on-windows/its-microsoft-patch-tuesday-january-2012/5547?tag=content;blog-list-river
MS12-006http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-006/KB2643584http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2643584
- Important
This is a known issue. See the MS12-006 Article for additional information and
possible workarounds.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2643584
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Lovely.
I just tried this, and it appears work... for now:
Uncheck ALL TLS (1.0, 1.1, and 1.2) in IE settings for secure sites to
work again
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 3:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
They outline some steps to disable/enable the update if needed: (Via
Registry, which also means GPO)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2643584
From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
On 1/11/2012 3:28 PM, Sam Cayze wrote:
They outline some steps to disable/enable the update if needed: (Via
Registry, which also means GPO)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2643584
So the work-around is .. to not use this critical patch. Turn it off
via registry, GPO, or FixMeNow.
Which
It does say 'some'. I put this on my system last night and it hasn't
affected any of our internal sites that I normally connect to.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Mike Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/11/2012 3:28 PM, Sam Cayze wrote:
They outline some steps to disable/enable the
On 1/11/2012 5:08 PM, Steven Peck wrote:
It does say 'some'. I put this on my system last night and it hasn't
affected any of our internal sites that I normally connect to.
I installed it this morning, and I haven't been blocked, either.
Of course, that's no comfort to the folks who have to
Does anyone know what would be blocked? I'd rather not install it if there's a
chance it's going to break website access. Most of our work is through
websites.
Joe Heaton
ITB - Windows Server Support
-Original Message-
From: Mike Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
From the artcle it seems more that the sites do not respond 'as expected'
to https requests. So it seems it would be more on specific web site
configurations then a 'general' thing.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Heaton, Joseph@DFG jhea...@dfg.ca.govwrote:
Does anyone know what would be
You know, I've been hearing advances in hotmail are making feature parity
happen, so, time to check it out and see. Maybe switch over.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
Going one
I have an Enterprise CA and 2 Sub-CA's.
One domain has the Enterprise CA, the other 2 domains have the Sub-CA's.
One Sub CA certificate in one domain has expired. I can't seem to get it
renewed. What am I missing?
The cert is used for wireless access certificate. I can authenticate with
a
Thanks for the heads up on this patch and its malfesance
It aint the first or last time its going to happen.
EZ
Edward E. Ziots
Senior Informational Security Engineer
CISSP,Security +,Network+
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:07:18 -0500
From: oozerd...@gmail.com
To:
Out of curiousity, when was the last time you had a real 'patched' caused
issue? Ours was the patch that reset OCS which was a few years ago. It
had a limited impact. Since then we've had no patches which nuked
anything. (Disclaimer, we can only put approved patches on certain telecom
servers
I agree with this but I too have to limit my scope to only a few machines
(not Telecom servers) about 15 servers over maybe the last 8 years or so.
Even this one does not seem to be a general thing and more towards HTTPS
web servers that are not responding as expected. It will take a while for
http://support.microsoft.com/common/international.aspx?RDPATH=dm;en-us;selecttarget=assistance
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Eldridge, D K, [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Well, I am curious. We have ~1500 servers here and monthly patch them all
over the last few years and whenever some developer 'claims' it's 'the
patch' after MS involvement we have always found no, no it's not.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with
It's been about 5 years since I've had the last patch related problem --
not to say I haven't seen other people with them, but they haven't been
widespread enough for me to be impacted. I had one in 2006 or 2007 which
was XML related and impacted BES.
Oh, and I had a machine with a Vista SP1
I have done a bunch of reading at this point but all of it Microsoft
documents. I am still doing research but I am hoping this will turn out to
be a non-issue.
From reading the Microsoft documents on Bitlocker I see notations of
issues related to updating certain software breaking (trashing from
So...what's in the event log on the sub CA?
- WJR
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 18:30, Troy Adkins tadk...@house.virginia.govwrote:
I have an Enterprise CA and 2 Sub-CA's.
One domain has the Enterprise CA, the other 2 domains have the Sub-CA's.
One Sub CA certificate in one domain has expired.
Wasn't there one that screwed up the NTFS system on some machines a couple
years ago...compression or reset ACL's some such thing?
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 6:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: KB2585542 stops access to websites
Step 1: Remove engine
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 1:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: LOL.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
This article says Microsoft Visual
Man... this makes me yearn for EULA discussions of yore...
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: LOL.
Still common. And still silly.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Me as well
Guido Elia
HELPPC - HELPPC SERVICE
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Mike Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
Inviato: mercoledì 11 gennaio 2012 22.07
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: Re: KB2585542 stops access to websites
On 1/11/2012 3:28 PM, Sam Cayze wrote:
They outline some
55 matches
Mail list logo
