Re: [OctDev] octave fixed point package: from where to download ?

On 09/12/2011 11:17 AM, Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Dario Cardini > wrote: >> Dear Michael, >> do you know if there is any plan to port it to 3.4.x ? > I have no idea, I'm not the package maintainer. > David Bateman hasn't been v

Re: [OctDev] Goin the developer team of octave

On 05/30/2011 03:10 PM, santiago reyes wrote: > for i=1:fila > for j=1:columna > im_out(i,j,1) = uint8(floor(77*im_cal(i,j,1)+ > 150*im_cal(i,j,2) + 29*im_cal(i,j,3))); Can't that be written as im_out(:,:,1) = uint8(floor(77*im_cal(:,:,1)+150*im_cal(:,:,2)+29*im_cal(:,

Re: [OctDev] PKG: Communications

On 05/21/2011 10:37 PM, David Bateman wrote: > Getting rid of the short-circuit warnings is easy, as these are just | > to replace with || and & with && (in code I didn't write btw). Though > fixing the dispatch warning is going to be a pain. Its easy enough to > fix

Re: [OctDev] PKG: Communications

On 05/21/2011 05:54 AM, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:52 AM, David Bateman wrote: >> On 05/19/2011 05:45 PM, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> Any news on this? Thanks >>> >>> I cannot install the communications pac

[OctDev] Octave-Forge FTP package

As of Octave 3.4, octave now has an ftp function in the core of Octave. I propose to change the dependency line in the ftp package description to Depends: octave (>= 2.9.12) Depends: octave (< 3.4.0) After that we can upload one last version of the ftp package so that it won't accidentally be ins

Re: [OctDev] PKG: Communications

On 05/19/2011 05:45 PM, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > Dear all, > Any news on this? Thanks > > I cannot install the communications package (octave 3.5.0+). > > octave:133> pkg install -forge communications Yeah I haven't updated for Octave 3.4. I've pushed a fix to the SVN and will send you a cop

Re: [OctDev] Another Sparse Matrix problem

w4nderlust wrote: > Il giorno 09/gen/2011, alle ore 00.06, David Bateman ha scritto: > > >> w4nderlust wrote: >> >>> That's the way i'm working right now. >>> Really not right now, because i discovered a bug in the single thread >>>

Re: [OctDev] Another Sparse Matrix problem

w4nderlust wrote: > That's the way i'm working right now. > Really not right now, because i discovered a bug in the single thread > version and i'm correcting it at this time. Can you help me about it? > The problem is this: if the result matrix is a vector 1xn or nx1 the > final c.transpose() give

Re: [OctDev] Another Sparse Matrix problem

w4nderlust wrote: > Il giorno 06/gen/2011, alle ore 22.27, David Bateman ha scritto: > > >> w4nderlust wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone. >>> >>> I'm still working with sparse matrices in oct-file, but i've got some >>&g

Re: [OctDev] Another Sparse Matrix problem

w4nderlust wrote: > Hello everyone. > > I'm still working with sparse matrices in oct-file, but i've got some > problems: i'm doing some multithread and as the octave libraries > revealed to be not really thread safe (some unexpected crashed ofter > repeating executions) i did the dirty work by han

Re: [OctDev] Sparse matrix assign problem

Please keep responses on the list as the list is an invaluable source of information for people that have similar problems, and going offline deprives them of this information. w4nderlust wrote: > First thing: Thanks really much :) > then some questions: > 1) what's the difference between .cdx and

Re: [OctDev] Sparse matrix assign problem

e the a(i,b.xridx(k)) call. This might be done by either working with the transpose of a, though at the cost of more memory. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home) 92100 Boulogne-Billancour

Re: [OctDev] To register as a developer

bruno brouard wrote: > Hello > > > I would like to register as a developer to the GNU octave software. > > My aim is to try to translate to french the help message that appear in > octave. > > best regard > > Bruno Brouard > > PS. : my sourceforge username is: annoab > > > Bruno, We usually as

Re: [OctDev] Use of MATLAB Central (was Re: GPL violations)

Joe Vornehm Jr. wrote: > License discussions seem to generate a lot of bandwidth! I believe Judd is > correct that this is off-topic, so I will try to fork the discussion by > changing the subject line. > > I spoke today with a representative from The MathWorks who works with MATLAB > Central

Re: [OctDev] GPL violations

Judd, I prepared a long answer to you, addressing each of your point individually, but decided not to send it. Frankly yes I understand the subtleties of the GPL, BSD license and the mathcentral ToS and I stand by my original mail D. --

Re: [OctDev] GPL violations

Martin Helm wrote: > Wouldn't that logic mean that the validity of a BSD or GPL license depends on > the fact from where the source code is downloaded? > Then nobody can ever use any GPL or BSD licensed code, since it nether can be > asured that such a code is not at any time in the past download

Re: [OctDev] GPL violations

Judd Storrs wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, David Bateman wrote: > > >> The author of this package has been approached in the past about the >> compatibility of his code with the GPL and he had no desire to change his >> license or allow distribut

Re: [OctDev] GPL violations

Judd Storrs wrote: > Sorry to be the hatchet man, but... I'll tear the band-aid quickly: > > The following packages violate the licensing terms of the various octave > releases (GPLv2,3) and cannot be distributed even as source code. > > GPC :: http://octave.sourceforge.net/gpc/index.html > The

Re: [OctDev] Data Acquisition Package

Pablo Daniel Pareja Obregón wrote: > In order to do so, I must implement my own user defined types, as I > read in [2]. However, after googling a while, I haven't found much > documentation and examples on how programming my own types (besides > [2]). The Coda document was written against 2.1.x a

Re: [OctDev] cellfun and parcellfun

still have enough difference too ensure that the forked processes have different random sequences. It might be nice to add a feature like rand("state", "reset") or rand("state", []) that would reinitialize the state of the generator so

Re: [OctDev] A few (Octave) ideas

Thomas Treichl wrote: > On 04/06/10 20:44, Jake wrote: > >> I've seen some of the Octave m files...what is this Octave-style coding? >> The two space indentation? >> > > If I remember correctly then this is explained in the Octave manual, > examples are: > > I used (# is not known by Matla

Re: [OctDev] Export control

Judd Storrs wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM, David Bateman wrote: > >> I've never had to export to one of these six countries so don't know the >> details, but I suspect they block almost everything... Perhaps some things >> exported under the US EC

Re: [OctDev] Export control

Carnë Draug wrote: > On 28 April 2010 12:23, David Bateman wrote: > >> Errr, except that there exists the concept of reexportation. If Octave is >> deemed as a projet to reside in the US (and I'd say that it does), >> reexportation in contravention of the ex

Re: [OctDev] Export control

Judd Storrs wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Carnë Draug > wrote: > >> I am not spreading misinformation. David said it himself, that it's >> only the USA who blocks these countries. >> > > I don't think you understood David's response, then. Apparently, the > US does *not* have

Re: [OctDev] Export control

Carnë Draug wrote: > On 28 April 2010 10:54, Judd Storrs wrote: > >> Please read David's responses and stop spreading baseless >> misinformation. The laws seem to be fairly uniform throughout the >> world by international treaty. Perhaps you can tell us which country >> you inhabit and why you

Re: [OctDev] Export control

Søren Hauberg wrote: > tir, 27 04 2010 kl. 19:20 -0400, skrev Carnë Draug: > >> On 27 April 2010 17:11, Søren Hauberg wrote: >> tor, 22 04 2010 kl. 07:38 +0200, skrev David Bateman: >> > Octave includes the MD5 hashing algorithm and >

Re: [OctDev] Export control

Søren Hauberg wrote: > Personally, I find the US Export control to be stupid at best, but I am > not going to break it. I am also ridiculously low on time, so I am not > going to spend hundreds of hours migrating to a different host unless we > really have to. > Soren, The EC export control rul

Re: [OctDev] Export control

Carnë Draug wrote: > On 27 April 2010 17:11, Søren Hauberg wrote: > > >> tor, 22 04 2010 kl. 07:38 +0200, skrev David Bateman: >> >>> Octave includes the MD5 hashing algorithm and uses /dev/random if >>> available in the core of Octave and there

Re: [OctDev] UTF-8 vs ISO-8859-1

ish language itself. It can either be at the root of the package, in the inst/ directory or as a comment in one of the src files or m-files. The command in this file are run each time the package is loaded. D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambett

Re: [OctDev] UTF-8 vs ISO-8859-1

other issue found in Windows, how can I set the code page to a given > value (i.e., > dos("chcp 65001"); ) and keep it after Octave restarts? > > Thanks for your collaboration. > > Javier > > > -- David Batemandbate..

Re: [OctDev] Export control

Søren Hauberg wrote: > Hi All > > Carnë just mentioned that SourceForge blocks users from certain > countries. They do this to comply with US export regulations. As a > project administrator I can disable this blocking. This, however, > requires that I agree to the following text: > > This

Re: [OctDev] Openmp in Octave

Miguel A. Vázquez wrote: > The command > > cat config.h | grep HAVE_OPENMP > > doesn't give me any answer. > > M. A. > hg pull hg up ./autogen.sh ./configure make clean make and retest D. -- Download Intel® Paralle

Re: [OctDev] Openmp in Octave

Miguel A. Vázquez wrote: > Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > >> 2010/4/16 "Miguel A. Vázquez" : >> >> >>> 2010/4/16 "Miguel A. Vázquez" >> >: >>> >>> Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > 2010/4/15 "Miguel A. Vázquez"

Re: [OctDev] lists in 'optim'

Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:28 AM, David Bateman wrote: > >> Michael Creel wrote: >> >>> Internally, __bfgsmin.c uses feval to compute the function value. Perhaps >>> that could be changed to work with anonymous functions. I thin

Re: [OctDev] lists in 'optim'

Michael Creel wrote: > Internally, __bfgsmin.c uses feval to compute the function value. Perhaps > that could be changed to work with anonymous functions. I think that this > would be the hardest part of making the change. > > Here is a code snippet that is needed to accept a function as the fir

Re: [OctDev] block sparse matrices

Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:52 PM, David Bateman wrote: > >> Yeah, things like UMFPACK internally block the sparse matrices and treat the >> sub-blocks with blas (ie dense kernels), so its a well known trick. >> > > Internally? Or ca

Re: [OctDev] block sparse matrices

Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:14 PM, David Bateman wrote: > >> Jaroslav Hajek wrote: >> >>> I think I looked into those sources briefly (because I also noticed >>> that it implements basic ops), but indeed there seems to be not

Re: [OctDev] block sparse matrices

Jaroslav Hajek wrote: I think I looked into those sources briefly (because I also noticed that it implements basic ops), but indeed there seems to be nothing magical (read: no assembler). Some operations we need (such as transpose-multiply or diagonal scaling) were not even there, I think. That d

Re: [OctDev] block sparse matrices

Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > hi all, > > I contributed a toy implementation of block sparse matrices to the > linear-algebra package (also attached). > This is probably not meant for serious business, as all the code is > m-files only, but is rather a demonstration of what can now be done in > Octave. >

Re: [OctDev] New release system and web page up and running

Søren Hauberg wrote: > ons, 10 02 2010 kl. 00:09 +0100, skrev David Bateman: > >> Another nice feature of the old site was the link on the >> function pages to the SVN/HG repository copy of the file containing the >> definition of the function. This made quickly

Re: [OctDev] New release system and web page up and running

Carlo de Falco wrote: > On 12 Feb 2010, at 23:13, Søren Hauberg wrote: > > >> I don't think an elegant solution to this problem is feasibly. What I >> have written is quite a hack, but it works most of the time. We >> could in >> principle introduce a new texinfo macro that marks the first sen

Re: [OctDev] New release system and web page up and running

Søren Hauberg wrote: > tir, 09 02 2010 kl. 01:08 +0100, skrev David Bateman: > >> The site looks good, but a few simple bugs I noticed >> >> * On the the page http://octave.sourceforge.net/links.html the packages >> link points to packages.html and not packages.ph

Re: [OctDev] New release system and web page up and running

Søren Hauberg wrote: > man, 08 02 2010 kl. 20:08 +0100, skrev Javier Enciso: > >> It would be very nice if you or someone else from Octave's localization >> team can figure out what the problem is and how to solve it. >> >> I hope after that, everything would be in place for releasing the >> S

Re: [OctDev] How are md5 checksums generated in the translations?

Javier Enciso wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Søren Hauberg wrote: > > >> Hi All >> >> I just had a quick look at how we could possibly move the code for >> dealing with translations to m-files. I think it should be >> straight-forward, except I can't figure out how the md5 checksums i

Re: [OctDev] New release system and web page up and running

ve.sourceforge.net/communications/index.html no longer has a link to the comms toolbox manual as it used to have. Cheers David -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home) 92100 B

Re: [OctDev] New release system and web page up and running

Søren Hauberg wrote: > comm > The SVN version doesn't compile for me due to changes in > the unwind_protect API. > > fixed > The SVN version doesn't compile for me. > > triangular > Version 1.0.4 of the package doesn't build for me. > Are you building with 3.2.x or the deve

[OctDev] disabled yahoo e-mail accounts

I just received more than 20 messages from sourceforge announcing that an e-mail address at yahoo has been disabled due to excessive bounces.. Should I re-enable these accounts D. -- Throughout its 18-year history, RSA

Re: [OctDev] I want to contribute to octave project.

陈锟 wrote: > 2009/12/26 陈锟 > > >> Hi, >> My friends and I have finished the translation of the Preface and >> Chapter 1 of the octave mannual to Chinese. >> Welcome to give some suggestions! >> >> chenkun >> This is great and I congratulate you. At the moment the Octave manual is bui

Re: [OctDev] MarkerSize has no effect

Phil Fong wrote: > It does not seem possible to draw filled in circle markers of different > sizes. "plot(0:10,0:2:20,'o','MarkerSize',10, 'MarkerFaceColor', 'b')" gives > circles with a dot in the center. But that seems to be due to MarkerFaceColor > having no effect. "plot(0:10,0:2:20,'s','M

Re: [OctDev] Advice needed on contribution of .xls (Excel) access scripts

Philip Nienhuis wrote: >> I tend to use texinfo so that help pages appear correctly and I can >> include all of the documentation in a *.info in the directory with >> the functions and "doc " can give more complete documentation >> including examples and context than the help file can. > > Hmmm,

Re: [OctDev] Advice needed on contribution of .xls (Excel) access scripts

Philip Nienhuis wrote: > Hi, > > At my employer's office we use Matlab intensively and many, many data > are kept & handled in Excel spreadsheet files. So to be able to use > octave there I've made xlsread / xlswrite / xlsfinfo scripts as > octave drop-in replacements for use in procedures otherwis

Re: [OctDev] Release system / web page generation

categories and alphanumeric in the navbar isn't quite as nice as it used to be though.. Any chance of having the old navbar back, or does that go against each package is managed separately? D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta

Re: [OctDev] fixed-0.7.10.tar.gz with octave-3.2.2

SVN with a patch form the 13 June.. The last release of octave-forge was 8 June and so the difference is the instantiation.. So this seems to already be patched.. The next release of octave-forge will fix this issue. D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35

Re: [OctDev] fixed-0.7.10.tar.gz with octave-3.2.2

able to reproduce this problem I don't see how I can fix it. Note that I had no other packages installed when installing the fixed package. D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta

Re: [OctDev] proposed patch: qamdemod() fix and speed up

David Bateman wrote: Christian Neumair wrote: Thank you for the link. Comparing qaskenco() from MATLAB R2008 / 7.7.0.471 and the code written by you (octave 3.0.1), it looks like a) MATLAB's version *always* returns column vectors while octave's automatically returns row vectors

Re: [OctDev] proposed patch: qamdemod() fix and speed up

ctave? Where should they be documented? Shouldn't there be a > website and doc page listing the differences package-wise? > In the docstring of the function itself is the best place. D. -- David Batemandbate

Re: [OctDev] proposed patch: qamdemod() fix and speed up

d at the time I wrote them so this code might serve as a basis, but it probably makes sense to check that the same gray mappings are used in the matlab versions of qaskenco and qammod before doing this.. See the thread http://www.nabble.com/qammod-proposed-update-to24420799.html that prop

Re: [OctDev] qammod proposed update

. Basically, type I's are circular constellations, > and they're useful in fading channels if you use a differential coding > scheme. > > You can use the qamdemod that already exists in the communications > package, though you may have to chang

Re: [OctDev] access to svn

; forge name is "paramaniac". > > Regards, > Lukas > Done D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home) 92100 Boulogne-Bi

Re: [OctDev] Error installing fixed pkg under octave 3.2.0

ary-expression before 'd' > fixedMatrix.cc:874: error: 'retval' was not declared in this scope > fixedMatrix.cc:874: error: 'i' was not declared in this scope > fixedMatrix.cc:874: error: 'd' was not d

Re: [OctDev] arpack: eigs crash with octave 3.0.5 compiled with --enable-64

LOGICALs in external interfaces at > all and just use INTEGERs. > > cheers > > Then the pgf90 compiler with the -i8 flag is not standards compliant. Given that, then yes just using octave_idx_type is the right thing D. -- David Bateman

Re: [OctDev] Installing forge packages from svn

> benjamin > > ./autogen.sh ./configure mkdir packages cd main make pkg/optim cd ../packages/main octave --eval "pkg install optim-1.0.6.tar.gz" D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta

Re: [OctDev] arpack: eigs crash with octave 3.0.5 compiled with --enable-64

Alexander Barth wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:20 PM, David Bateman wrote: > >> Why not just use >> octave_idx_type if the fortran logical index is 8bit with --enable-64? >> >> > > This is in the end what I did, but I declared a macro > octave_f

Re: [OctDev] Error building combinatorics-1.0.8 on octave 3.2.0

; +++ combinatorics-1.0.8b/src/partint.cc 2009-06-06 22:29:04 +0200 > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > > > #include > +#include > > #include "partint.h" > This is already fixed in the SVN D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org

Re: [OctDev] arpack: eigs crash with octave 3.0.5 compiled with --enable-64

t; octave_idx_type (which becomes 64 bit with --enable-64). If other > fortran compiler work differently, it would be easier to modify the > code. > > If people are fine with the attached patch, I can apply it to octave-forge. > > Cheers, > Alex >

Re: [OctDev] Compilation fails for fixed 0.7.9

Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * David Bateman [2009-05-17 17:46]: > > >> Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >> >>> Compilation against Octave 3.0.5 of the fixed package version 0.7.9 fails >>> on my Debian sid system with: >>> >&g

Re: [OctDev] Compilation fails for fixed 0.7.9

gt; [with MT = FixedMatrix]’: > ov-fixed-mat.cc:59: instantiated from here > ov-base-fixed-mat.cc:109: error: ‘class FixedMatrix’ has no member named > ‘assign’ > > Any hint? > > Funny I've almost finished porting the fixed package to 3.1.55 so I don&#

Re: [OctDev] New release of Octave-forge packages

quite a number of functions other than imread and imwrite that were ported to the Octave core. So even if a package supports 3.0.x its possible that there'll be a regression in the functionality. Other function that I know moved from octave-forge are csvread, cvswrite, and dlmwrite, though the

Re: [OctDev] New release tomorrow

Søren Hauberg wrote: > tor, 07 05 2009 kl. 01:24 +0200, skrev David Bateman: > >> What I did in this case was to try and make a release for a particular >> version of Octave (3.1.55 in this case) and so the fact that all >> packages could be build with a single ver

Re: [OctDev] [gnu.org #432927] Can a Windows installer include both VC++ libs and GPLed libs?

no system libraries or bundling exceptions of the gpl are invoked.. This is essentially the same binary that is distributed with a shared version of octave with the exception that the runtime is not distributed as a separate library.. I fail to see why this is allowed whi

Re: [OctDev] [gnu.org #432927] Can a Windows installer include both VC++ libs and GPLed libs?

no system libraries or bundling exceptions of the gpl are invoked.. This is essentially the same binary that is distributed with a shared version of octave with the exception that the runtime is not distributed as a separate library.. I fail to see why this is allowed whi

Re: [OctDev] New release tomorrow

ising the next > system. > What I did in this case was to try and make a release for a particular version of Octave (3.1.55 in this case) and so the fact that all packages could be build with a single version of Octave wasn't an issue.. As you say this often meant quite a bit of bu

Re: [OctDev] Question on performance, coding style and competitive software

hat function even if all the code in it was mine.. Perhaps matlab's license manager has improved but if it hasn't your idea of getting matlab users to use matlab compatible octave-forge toolboxes might be dead in the water.. Frankly I always considered this behavior of matlab

Re: [OctDev] I want to get octave developer for Communications Toolbox

ation later. > > regards, > Martin A colleague of mine at Motorola wrote Octave versions of these function a while back and he felt he couldn't share them.. Perhaps his opinion has changed now that he no longer works there.. In any case vitdec basically has to be an oct-file if you wan

Re: [OctDev] Question on performance, coding style and competitive software

Alois Schlögl wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Bateman wrote: > >> Alois Schlögl wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> >>> As some of you might know,

Re: [OctDev] Question on performance, coding style and competitive software

> I'm not sure how this point differs from your second point.. Again to me its up to the toolboxes/packages author to decide whether they want matlab compatibility or not. If a toolbox is compatible I see no issue sending matlab users to octave-forge for code.. D. -- Dav

Re: [OctDev] No symbolic package in future (Windows/VC++) releases

ired to download the additional components themselves So accepting the CLN's developers position has ramifications beyond the octave symbolic package... So getting the FSF's position is important. D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambe

Re: [OctDev] No symbolic package in future (Windows/VC++) releases

eing part of the compilation process. D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home) 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE+33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) ---

Re: [OctDev] No symbolic package in future (Windows/VC++) releases

s thread the CLN author won't accept any of our muses as evidence one way or the other and his position puts in doubt the use of VC++ for any binary GPL distribution, CLN, Octave or otherwise, so we should bump this to licens...@fsf.org and get a definitive opinion. Cheers David

Re: [OctDev] creating an matrix from C++ array

*p = A.fortran_vec (); Note the const version is useful if "A" comes from somewhere else in Octave and you'll only be reading the data. You can avoid a copy of A internally in Octave in that way if the reference point to the underlying data of "A" is greater than

Re: [OctDev] Register as a developer

is in fact added by the "octlang tag" script so you don't need to add it yourself as you seem to have done. Cheers David -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta +33

Re: [OctDev] HTML documentation

rceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev > There seems to be a lot of extra $ symbols in the operator overloading section of http://hauberg.org/manual//chapter/oop.html Also why ".../manual//chapter..." and not ".../manual/chapter..." Cheers David -- David Bateman

Re: [OctDev] Small change request

r code? > > Thanks, Stephen > As its a C++ file I included instead Thanks David -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home) 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

Søren Hauberg wrote: > søn, 08 02 2009 kl. 09:05 +0100, skrev David Bateman: > >> We could perhaps even allow >> the package manager to do that.. >> > > I don't really understand what you're hinting at. > Just that if we are allows the pac

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

rse the webpages installed on octave-forge and create the alphabetical function-reference in place. We could perhaps even allow the package manager to do that.. D. -- David Batemandbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Ho

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

Søren Hauberg wrote: > lør, 07 02 2009 kl. 18:07 +0100, skrev David Bateman: > >> I'm not sure I like the way the manual is displayed as one of the side >> menus of the function reference. Sure have a side menu for the manual >> on the web site, but a di

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

s. > > > I'm not sure I like the way the manual is displayed as one of the side menus of the function reference. Sure have a side menu for the manual on the web site, but a different one from the function reference and then readd the alphabetical tab to the side menu. Also menu

Re: [OctDev] trouble copying sparse matrix

dx(0) = jj; for (octave_idx_type j = 0; j ::const_iterator p = TNT::Sparse_Matrix::S_[j].begin(); p value();; sparseOctaveMatrix.xridx(jj++) = p->index();; } sparseOctaveMatrix.xcidx(j + 1) = jj; } sparseOctaveMatrix = sparseOctaveMatrix.transpose (); } will do what you want.. Maybe it'll give you ideas f

Re: [OctDev] Request for password

> > Eh, is this a real request? I'm surprised by the second sentence. > > Thomas > > I suspect its a real request as Ludwig Kanzler wrote a set of econometric functions from matlab/octave and his code is listed on the wiki.. D. -- David Bateman

Re: [OctDev] Audio package

educed his effort significantly.. He is still subscribed to this list and so might respond.. In any case why not discuss your ideas directly here.. I don't believe anyone is working on the audio package at the moment.. D. -- David Batemandbate...@d

Re: [OctDev] [patch] a lot of work on the control package, please review it

Luca Favatella wrote: On 27/12/2008, David Bateman wrote: Luca, I think the control toolbox might be considered as orphaned as not much has been done on it for a few years, as you are interested in making it more compatible then you should probably be made the maintainer of this package

Re: [OctDev] [patch] a lot of work on the control package, please review it

David Bateman wrote: > > That being the case and as you don't yet have an octave-forge account, > what is your sourceforge username and I'll add you as a developer to > octave-forge and you can commit this change yourself.. > opps yes you do have an octave-forge accoun

Re: [OctDev] [patch] a lot of work on the control package, please review it

ould probably be made the maintainer of this package.. The changes you propose to my naive eye all seem to make sense... That being the case and as you don't yet have an octave-forge account, what is your sourceforge username and I'll add you as a developer to octave-forge and you c

Re: [OctDev] octave filtfilt

Citi, Luca wrote: > Dear David Bateman, > I am an octave user. I write you because you committed a change to the > filtfilt function lately. > I found a problem with filtfilt. I posted a message to the octave-dev mailing > list on Nov 3rd. > http://sourceforge.net/maila

Re: [OctDev] Invalid order 18 for Galois Field

d > > > Note that the galois field is represented internally as an Array2. So on a 32-bit platform I'd say grade 31 is the maximum supported, on a 64-bit platform it would be grade 63.. To go above that the code would need significant changes D. -- David Bateman

Re: [OctDev] bug in gram(a, b) and/or lyap(a, b) + proposed xtest patch for gram

ans you've inherited the lyap and gram functions :-) D. -- David Bateman[EMAIL PROTECTED] 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home) 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE+33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) --

Re: [OctDev] nnet bugs: package version and sim texinfo

Søren Hauberg wrote: > The third line says '@{mInput}' which should be '@var{mInput}'. I've > fixed this in SVN. > > I actually just realized my commit failed as yours was underway at the same time.. Oh well, I combined my change

Re: [OctDev] nnet bugs: package version and sim texinfo

gt; @code{net} is created with newff(..) and @{mInput} should be the corresponding > input data set! > @end deftypefn > Ok, fixed that and the version number and committed the fix to the SVN.. Cheers David -- David Bateman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Motorola La

Re: [OctDev] pdist uploaded

than in the svn log? > The SVN log is used to create the ChangeLog file on the website and manually at the time of a release to create the NEWS entries. So no you don't need to log the changes anywhere else, but ensure that the SVN log entries are relatively complete. Regards David

Re: [OctDev] pdist function

point in the future. Your choice, of > course. Or just assume that the next octave-forge release will be for 3.2 :-) At least that was the aim, though 3.2 is seeming further away at the moment. D. -- David Bateman[EMAIL PROTECTED] 35 rue Gambetta

  1   2   3   >