[onap-tsc] Casablanca Participation

Dear TSC, VNFSDK plans to participate in the Casablanca release. Chris ___ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-usecasesub] [**EXTERNAL**] The summary of Usecase subcommittee meeting 14/05/2017 - Casablanca use cases/functional requirements endorsement

Agreed. This appears to be a significant change to the existing architecture, and should be discussed with the wider community. Let me know when you're ready, and I'll allocate a slot on the agenda. Chris From: mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of Stephen Terrill

Re: [onap-tsc] [ARCH] Request scope change review: POMBA introduction in Logging project for Casablanca

quest the first hour – as we have our logging meeting in the 2nd hour of the Arch meeting Thank you /michael From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Michael O'Brien Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018

Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Members Composition Survey RFC - Respond by 18:00 Pacific time, May 7

If we do proceed with this motion, I think we should separate out PTLs from the other positions. PTLs are responsible for managing a single project, whereas the other positions are responsible for cross-project leadership. In some cases, it makes sense that one of the project leaders also

Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Members Composition Survey RFC - Respond by 18:00 Pacific time, May 7

Thanks Kenny. Our suggestion could be paraphrased as "one of anything that shows up on Bitergia" (except email, which we thought was too low a bar). 1 wiki page would be sufficient. Chris From: Kenny Paul > Date: Friday, May 4, 2018

[onap-tsc] Proxy for May 10 meeting

Dear Team, I will be traveling internationally next week from 5/9-13. During my absence, Chaker Al Hakim will serve as my proxy on the TSC. Thanks, Chris ___ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org

Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal

Kenny, I think that's the wrong way to frame this. I don't object to any company being represented on the TSC, but I think we need to look at the needs of the community and what leadership structure would best support it. Earlier, Mazin expressed his principles for the new TSC. Here are mine:

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-lf-announce] Jenkins and Nexus downtime

+1  From: Gildas Lanilis To: Kenny Paul; onap-tsc; Cc: onap-lf-annou...@lists.onap.org; Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-lf-announce] Jenkins and Nexus downtime Time: 2018-04-17 18:29:51 Dear TSC member, Nexus 3 is so slow that it will really help the ONAP community to have that work done

Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal

TSC meeting next week. Thanks in advance for your feedback. Best, Phil. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Christopher Donley (Chris) <christopher.don...@huawei.com<mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com>> wrote: Alex, That’s the intention (same with use case, etc.). We want a way to measure

[onap-tsc] ONAP TSC Feedback Session

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=Christopher Donley (Chris):MAILTO:christopher.don...@huawei.co m ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-tsc@l

Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal

eading the next slides it seems that only active contributors will be able to vote, so there is no guarantee operators who did not contribute yet will get a seat at the TSC. Would you care to elaborate on this please? Thanks, Ranny. From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists

Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal

. From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris) Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 1:58 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Action Plan towards Casablanca

Mazin, As we discussed, please make sure that we follow the charter in proposing the end-user advisory committee (I.e, formal documentation of the purpose, scope, membership, etc) so that the TSC can review and vote on it. I think it’s a good idea, but I want to see the details and make sure

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-tsc-vote] ONAP Beijing Architecture Approval (ends 5PM Pacific, March 20)

Let’s put it on the agenda for this week’s call and hold the vote in real time. I don’t see any value in delaying. The issue, as I see it, is that the TSC has a difficult time achieving quorum for votes. At least since the beginning of the year, we have missed quorum a number of times, and

[onap-tsc] Creation request for coordination area: Infrastructure

Dear TSC, As I mentioned in my previous email, I would like to propose the creation of an Infrastructure Coordinator role to manage repository creation requests and other LF infrastructure issues on behalf of the TSC. I think the current repository creation process is too slow, and a

Re: [onap-tsc] Committer Promotion Request for [appc]

+1 From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gadiyar, Rajesh Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 10:11 PM To: aayush.bhatna...@ril.com; lxin...@vmware.com; rx1...@att.com; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; kp...@linuxfoundation.org Cc:

Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP Representative to the LFN TAC

Thanks Phil. I agree with your recommendation – I would prefer #2, as well. Thanks, Chris From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Phil Robb Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 7:08 AM To: onap-tsc Subject: [onap-tsc] We

Re: [onap-tsc] Next week f2f meeting

We’ll be talking about this on Monday. Jason Hunt is conducting a survey of where each component is along the S3P continuum. The goal of Beijing will be to improve on where we are, not necessarily to target a set level across the board. Aiming for a fixed target would jeopardize our six-month

Re: [onap-tsc] Project part of Wiki

I think we should have four sections for projects: *Draft (a sandbox for developing proposals) *Proposed (for TSC review - once someone sends the required email to the TSC) *Approved (all currently approved projects, independent of releases) *Closed (all

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-arc] ONAP Architecture presentation

It's available under the Architecture Subcommittee page on the wiki (with recording): https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/November+21 Some of the slides have already been uploaded, but I received two last-minute requests for slots and I haven't seen those slides yet. LiZi and Maopeng, would you

[onap-tsc] VNFSDK intention to participate in Beijing release

Dear ONAP TSC, As we have now passed the M0 milestone, the VNFSDK team would like to formally announce that we plan to participate in the Beijing release. Chris ___ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

The architecture subcommittee is working on the high-level architecture. See http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guides/onap-developer/architecture/onap-architecture.html Projects themselves are publishing the more detailed architecture, APIs, etc. on readthedocs. Chris From:

[onap-tsc] Oct 6 status

Team, This week, the ARC team worked on the whitepaper and diagrams documenting the R1 architecture. We also began the discussion of S3P and planned next steps for the next few weeks. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/October+3 Chris ___ ONAP-TSC

Re: [onap-tsc] [tsc]Vote: ONAP Deployment Proposal for Amsterdam Release

By when do we need to make this decision? I thought we said we'd wait until the code freeze next week to see how much progress we've made. Chris From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Roger Maitland Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 1:13

Re: [onap-tsc] R2 non-functional requirements

Also, the recordings from the call are posted on the wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Joint+meetings. Chris From: onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 11:43 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P

[onap-tsc] Joint Architecture/Use Case meeting

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=Christopher Donley (Chris):MAILTO:christopher.don...@huawei.co m ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Alla Goldn

[onap-tsc] Architecture subcommittee update

This week on the architecture call, we reviewed the R1 and R2 diagrams, and prepared for the joint Architecture/Use Case call. Notes, material, and recording: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=11929318 On the joint architecture/use case call, we discussed the VoLTE and

Re: [onap-tsc] Leadership Diversity Language

: Phil Robb [mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:14 PM To: Christopher Donley (Chris) <christopher.don...@huawei.com> Cc: Stephen Terrill <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>; Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; t...@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [on

Re: [onap-tsc] Usecase/Arch subcommittees joint meeting on Wednesday

Thanks to all who joined today's joint ARC/usecase meeting. The Zoom recording is now available https://zoom.us/recording/play/EZc2tN4iOTpsqZzkywoCrsdQg9kLjKSOshwnzG9dvQAfb1CesU8N3sHqvkWyaU0a Chris From: onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of

[onap-tsc] FW: Joint Architecture/Use Case meeting

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=Christopher Donley (Chris);SENT-BY="MAILTO:Alla.Goldner@amdocs. com":MAILTO:christopher.don...@huawei.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NE

Re: [onap-tsc] Vote on Date & Location of Next ONAP Developer Face To Face

+1 From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Phil Robb Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 2:49 PM To: onap-tsc Subject: [onap-tsc] Vote on Date & Location of Next ONAP Developer Face To Face Hello ONAP TSC Members: As

Re: [onap-tsc] Leadership Diversity Language

I agree that this topic would be more appropriate as a TSC policy than as text in the Charter. Chris From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 12:22 AM To: Kenny Paul ;

Re: [onap-tsc] Architecture meeting tomorrow

Just to confirm, due to other overlaps, I'm afraid I can't re-arrange the schedule for tomorrow. We will use the original schedule as shown below. Chris From: Yoav Kluger [mailto:yoav.klu...@amdocs.com] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 12:16 PM To: Christopher Donley (Chris) <christopher.

[onap-tsc] Joint Architecture/Use Case meeting

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=Christopher Donley (Chris):MAILTO:christopher.don...@huawei.co m ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-arc@l

[onap-tsc] Architecture meeting tomorrow

Dear ONAP Community, We will be holding our next ARC meeting tomorrow from 1400-1600 UTC. The agenda is as follows: *Update on SDC VoLTE onboarding gap analysis and open issues (Michael - 1 hr) *VF-C/A (Victor/Lingli - 30 min) *SO/APP-C/VF-C perspective from Orange

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Architecture Progress

target, and did agree to look at their code and try to identify any "baby steps" they could take in that direction for the Amsterdam release. Chris From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 9:46 AM To: Christopher Donley (Chris) <ch

Re: [onap-tsc] TSC VOTE on Repos for AAI, AAF, Modeling & MSB

+1 All From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 11:49 AM To: onap-tsc Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC VOTE on Repos for AAI, AAF, Modeling & MSB As mentioned we have several repository

Re: [onap-tsc] Architecture Progress

from Tuesday's call. If you have concerns, please share them during the meeting. I'll be happy to reserve a slot on the agenda. Chris From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:59 AM To: Christopher Donley (Chris) <christopher.don...@huawei.

Re: [onap-tsc] REMINDER - Re: Irregularities in the Use Case Subcommittee Chair Election

I’m happy to help, but I’ll be traveling internationally starting Wednesday, so my participation will be limited after tomorrow. I would like to make sure we differentiate between eligibility for participation and eligibility for voting. For participation, I agree with Bob. As a general rule,

Re: [onap-tsc] YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED: A Project needs new repos for microservices

+1 From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gildas Lanilis Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 3:27 PM To: 'onap-tsc@lists.onap.org' Subject: [onap-tsc] YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED: A Project needs new repos for microservices Importance: High Dear TSC

Re: [onap-tsc] Corrective Action on Approved Project Proposals

+1 From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 12:13 PM To: onap-tsc Subject: [onap-tsc] Corrective Action on Approved Project Proposals TSC Members: The following are discrepancies and/or change requests

Re: [onap-tsc] Optimization framework

Thanks Oliver. That works for me. Chris -Original Message- From: SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) [mailto:spat...@research.att.com] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 12:50 PM To: Christopher Donley (Chris) Cc: Stephen Terrill; PUTHENPURA, SARAT (SARAT); onap-tsc Subject: Re: [onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Invitation: ONAP Architecture Subcommittee WeeklyMeeting @ Weekly from 08:00 to 09:00 on Tuesday (PDT)(christopher.don...@huawei.com)

e Architecture Subcommittee call. Please advise. Thanks Vladimir From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris) Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:52 PM To: Vul, Alex <alex@intel.com>; Yoav Kluger <

Re: [onap-tsc] Special (and longer) TSC meeting this Thursday 6/22/17

+1, since we scheduled this week’s Architecture meeting to start at 8. Chris From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Ed Warnicke Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 6:35 AM To: Phil Robb Cc: onap-tsc Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Special (and longer) TSC

Re: [onap-tsc] Invitation: ONAP Architecture Subcommittee Weekly Meeting @ Weekly from 08:00 to 09:00 on Tuesday (PDT) (christopher.don...@huawei.com)

:25 AM To: Yoav Kluger; Christopher Donley (Chris); cc...@linuxfoundation.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Invitation: ONAP Architecture Subcommittee Weekly Meeting @ Weekly from 08:00 to 09:00 on Tuesday (PDT) (christopher.don...@huawei.com) +1 From

Re: [onap-tsc] Invitation: ONAP Architecture Subcommittee Weekly Meeting @ Weekly from 08:00 to 09:00 on Tuesday (PDT) (christopher.don...@huawei.com)

As a reminder, the ARC meeting this week has been moved to Thursday during this timeslot. Chris -Original Appointment- From: ONAP Meetings and Events Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 7:44 PM To: ONAP Meetings and Events; onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Christopher Donley

Re: [onap-tsc] Invitation: ONAP Architecture Subcommittee Weekly Meeting @ Weekly from 08:00 to 09:00 on Tuesday (PDT) (christopher.don...@huawei.com)

Dear Team, Due to the OPNFV Summit, I need to cancel this week’s Architecture meeting. Our next call will focus on VF-C/APP-C, and several people critical to this discussion are unavailable this week. We will resume our calls next week. Chris -Original Appointment- From: ONAP

Re: [onap-tsc] Usage of commercial VNF and NFVI+VIM solutions for ONAP R1 use cases, and open lab

I think there’s a difference between using proprietary software in the production of the platform (e.g., incorporating proprietary code into ONAP) and testing to make sure that ONAP will work in an ecosystem including commercial products (e.g., bringing commercial VNFs, VIMs, etc. into the

Re: [onap-tsc] project proposal: VNF SDK

Erik Sundelof from AT is putting that proposal together. Chris From: Andrei Kojukhov [mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com] Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 4:07 AM To: Christopher Donley (Chris) Cc: Alla Goldner; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: FW: project proposal: VNF SDK Hi Chris, Where and when

[onap-tsc] project proposal: VNF SDK

Dear ONAP TSC, The VNF SDK team would like to formally propose the VNF SDK project: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VNF+SDK. Note that we have adjusted the scope of this project and split the original proposal into three parts. VNF SDK (this project) is focused on developing tools for VNF

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] ONAP Architecture subcommittee kickoff

:17 PM To: denghui (L); Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] ONAP Architecture subcommittee kickoff Hui, Thanks for the clarification. Sorry for the confusion. Lingli From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com

Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee

) [mailto:ranny.ha...@nokia.com] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 11:33 AM To: Alla Goldner; Christopher Donley (Chris); SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER); aayush.bhatna...@ril.com Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee Chris, I am having a hard time figuring

Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee

: Alla Goldner [mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 9:59 PM To: Kanagaraj Manickam; Bob Monkman; Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc Subject: RE: Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee Hi, According to the Charter, It is expected that subcommittee membership shall

Re: [onap-tsc] CI/CD

Gildas and I have been participating in the group, representing OPEN-O, and Phil has been active, as well. This group is working more along the lines of harmonizing tools, labs, and processes, rather than Integration. I would recommend whomever is maintaining the CI/CD tooling and

Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee

Bob, I propose that it's open to anyone, regardless of membership level (if any). Thanks, Chris From: Bob Monkman [mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:32 AM To: Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee Chris

[onap-tsc] TSC Charter

Dear TSC, For your reference, here is the TSC Charter we approved yesterday. The team and I made the updates we discussed in the meeting and cleaned up the formatting. We have asked LF to post a copy of this to the website. Chris -- next part -- An HTML attachment was

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP TSC VICE-CHAIRPERSON ELECTION] Kickoff of the ONAP TSC Vice-Chairperson Election

Dear ONAP TSC, I am interested in serving as ONAP’s TSC Vice-Chairperson. In this role, I will focus on two priorities: community and cadence. I am committed to openness and transparency, making room for other people’s contributions, and recruiting new developers and new companies. Also, I

[onap-tsc] Repo Question

+1 Chris From: onap-tsc-bounces at lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 10:06 AM To: Ed Warnicke; SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) Cc: Phil Robb via onap-tsc Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Repo Question +1 Alla Goldner

[onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter

, April 21, 2017 12:56 PM To: Christopher Donley (Chris) Cc: SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER); Ed Warnicke; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; onap-tsc at lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter I'd suggest distributing responsibilities at bit more (rather than centralizing in a Release Manager

[onap-tsc] Project proposal training material

] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 8:28 AM To: Christopher Donley (Chris) Cc: onap-tsc at lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Project proposal training material Chris, Was there a Project proposal Wiki template page in https://confluence.open-o.org/? If so, I could easily duplicate this page

[onap-tsc] Project proposal training material

Team, As we discussed on today's TSC call, here is a presentation from OPEN-O on how to put together a project proposal. While we haven't specifically discussed the format for ONAP proposals, I expect it will be similar (ODL, OPNFV, OPEN-O, and FD.IO all share a common format with minor

[onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter

be jettisoned if the team starts to fall behind. Chris From: Dhananjay Pavgi [mailto:dp00476...@techmahindra.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 5:12 AM To: Stephen Terrill; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc at lists.onap.org Cc: Ed Warnicke Subject: RE: Updated TSC Charter

[onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter

] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 4:55 AM To: GOLDNER, ALLA Cc: Don Clarke; Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc at lists.onap.org; Ed Warnicke Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter I would have expected to have at least a coordinator focused on this or even better a project which builds risk

[onap-tsc] May face-to-face: NA location?

Many of our Chinese colleagues already have multi-entry visas into the US, but not necessarily into Canada. While the Canadian visa process may be faster, there isn?t time to go through the application process due to upcoming travel for ONS. My Huawei colleagues from China would prefer New

[onap-tsc] ONAP Project: TSC Meeting Minutes 3 //Canada Visa request 4 weeks, we can not attend the F2F meeting in Canada.

The first week in May is problematic for me, particularly if we hold it on the East Coast. We have an OPEN-O minisummit at the Layer123 conference (SJC) on Wednesday, May 3 from 4-6 pm, and I have another speaking slot Thursday from 12:30-1:30. We are planning to announce our second release

[onap-tsc] ONAP TSC Policies & Processes

Ed, Phil, and ONAP TSC, Thanks for starting the discussion. I?d also like to point to OPEN-O?s TSC Charter: https://wiki.open-o.org/display/TSC/TSC+Charter. It?s similar to the ODL and FD.IO charters (and OPNFV), but has a few differences that may be relevant here: ?Terminology and