I recall the discussion about the BerkeleyDB. However, the dots with respect
to the current state and consequences for users were not connected for me until
I saw Jürgen Schmidt's reply today concerning the experience of Larry Gusaas.
My creation of this derivative thread was immediate. It
, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I recall the discussion about the BerkeleyDB. However, the dots with respect
to the current state and consequences for users were not connected for me
until I saw Jürgen Schmidt's reply today concerning the experience of Larry
Gusaas.
My
Subject: Re: Symantec WS.Reputation.1 Errors: What we can do
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Out of curiosity I just did another download of the OOo-dev 3.4 Windows MSI
r1293550 to see if the popularity contest had been won yet.
Not yet
-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 12:39
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Signing DLLs EXEs and Copyright Notices (was RE: Symantec
WS.Reputation.1 Errors: What we can do)
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 14:19
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Signing DLLs EXEs and Copyright Notices (was RE: Symantec
WS.Reputation.1 Errors: What we can do)
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Just to be clear, further
First, the safest way to avoid those problems on Windows is to install the
OOo-dev 3.4 developer builds. These do not overload on existing OpenOffice.org
installations.
If the system integration builds are used, they identify themselves as OOo 3.4
and this will indeed cause collisions. They
The reported bug is about a date conversion error on loading of a stored ODP
file. It appears from the description that the conversion fails and a
serial-date number of 0 results.
If it can be confirmed that the error is localized to that case, the fix has to
be benign. This would be
The Apache OOo PPMC announces the addition of committer
and PPMC member Regina Henschel, regina@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache
Software Foundation:
-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 14:12
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Nominate release blocker: 118999 - Leap year not correctly
calculated
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
The reported
No, this is definitely not the Excel leap-year bug.
Compensation for the [Visicalc?]/Lotus/Excel Leap-Year bug is what has the
default OO.o Calc serial-day for 1899-12-30 be 0 rather than have 1899-12-31 be
serial-day 0 as it is in Excel. This way, all dates starting with March 1,
1900 have
...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 17:25
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Nominate release blocker: 118999 - Leap year not correctly
calculated
On 03/03/12 17:34, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Amen on understanding the scope of the bug!!
As promised, I built a smoke-test
I agree with Oliver that it is INVALID.
This means using metadata in valid ODF files as a way of discriminating against
the producer. That sucks. The generator marker is explicitly not for this
purpose.
How unsupported features are dealt with when opening such a file is a different
matter
I can also confirm that the OOO-dev 3.4 x86_install_en-US r1293550 downloaded
2012-02-28 installs perfectly on a fresh Windows 8 Consumer Preview (64 bit)
running under VirtualBox 4.1.8 on Windows 7 (64 bit). The registration of
start-menu entries is automatically turned into tiles on the
The web-based downloader in Internet Explorer 9 also warns about the .exe files
(not the tar.gz or Zip ones). The message is clearly a no-reputation-yet
warning.
This is an on-line check. When the file is known to be regularly downloaded,
the report will change automatically.
I have
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 11:12
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Test results: AOO run on Windows 8
I can also confirm that the OOO-dev 3.4 x86_install_en-US r1293550 downloaded
2012-02-28 installs
that is downloaded. (It
appears that LibreOffice has changed that.) It strikes me that using external
digest values (md5 and sh1 digests) on the download requires a super-user skill
set and should not be the only thing relied upon for project binary releases.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton
I don't want to touch the draft.
I have but one suggestion:
Move the most important and actionable information to the very top. That is,
background and related elaboration should follow for the curious.
I think this is also important for non-native-English recipients who attempt to
figure
All right, let's get specific:
I propose that Hagar Delest be invited to become a Committer and PPMC Member.
As soon after midnight Thursday, 2012-02-23T24:00Z that this discussion quiets,
I will review the discussion and determine whether there is sufficient
consensus to undertake a [VOTE].
of the PPMC to conduct all
personnel matters privately and in confidence.
I screwed up.
The offending message cannot be removed.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 15:46
To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator
This event is in Bellingham, Washington, on April 28-29.
Bellingham is between Seattle, Washington US, and Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada on US Interstate I-5.
I expect to be around at that time though I am probably not a good candidate
for a LinuxFest. I believe there are a few others
Last week I received the MSDN Membership offer for Apache Committers. It is an
MSDN Ultimate, which is surprising and far more than I can use. The current
interest on MSDN is in Visual Studio 2010 and the 2011 upgrades for Azure,
WindowsPhone, etc. But older versions can be downloaded.
*,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If Regina were the LO committer or the creator of the patches that were
committed,
She is.
author Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de 2011-06-06 17:31:56
(GMT)
committerFridrich Štrba
+1
- Dennis
(It reminded me that there were different rules for the best viewed using
, download it now buttons and that had me smile. I am not suggesting any
sort of parity here.)
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.r...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, February
Ji Yan,
I don't think the situation is that bad:
Progression through an instance of a test can be handled by comments and
managing the state of the bugzilla issue.
That may be too crude, and it doesn't deal with the need to automatically
populate a set of open tests for a new release.
Some
; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: Integration of my chart features
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If Regina has the right to submit the patches anywhere of her choosing, it
seems to me that her submitting them here is automatically covered
Not to muddy the waters, but I see ALv2 a lot and I tend to use it myself
after seeing it so often.
If apache-2.0 fits and it is the designation used by the Open Source
Initiative, I would use that, since it is from an authoritative registry for
open-source licenses,
Rob,
I haven't added any alias to try that, but I bet it is updated automatically in
its new location. (The old location of Alias.txt is now a one-liner that
directs users to a new location in id.apache.org.)
I also notice an improvement in the updating of Alias.txt by folks changing the
reference
These section gets always updated after a new release. It's the same
documentation that is also part of the SDK
I hope that make it a little bit more clear
Juergen
Regards,
Dave
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I am not clear what is what would
There is a committer-community maintained file called Alias.txt.
This is a private file that requires logon by a committer's SVN credentials to
accessed. The file was recently moved to
https://id.apache.org/info/MailAlias.txt.
This file is where a committer can list all e-mail addresses
I agree with Kay that one reason someone may want to contact us is because
there is a problem with the web site itself. I also think that going directly
to the mailing list page is perhaps too abrupt. Some free analysis from the
top of orcmid's head:
For issues about the site(s) itself, I
, February 10, 2012 12:51
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Committers and Alias.txt
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
There is a committer-community maintained file called Alias.txt.
This is a private file that requires logon by a committer's SVN
I finally nerved-up to figure out how to make the bookmarklet work in IE 9. It
took a little effort, but I managed it.
It is an interesting way to tell that a web page was published via the CMS, or
not.
Having looked around a little, I can understand why there are not many folks
who have the
I am not clear what is what would be called the maintainable source in the case
of the ooo-site.
It is useful to know that some of the pages are generated automatically as
byproducts of other processes (such as an IDL processor/generator) and are not
the maintainable source.
I wonder if there
illumination for you?
AFAIK - api is a special case and was discussed in the past. I'll find the
thread if needed.
Regards,
Dave
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I am not clear what is what would be called the maintainable source in the
case of the ooo-site
Louis,
Are you suggesting that extensions, the format of .oxt files, and the means by
which extensions can integrate into operation of an ODF processor should be the
subject of the ODF specification or some other interoperability agreement?
At the moment it is all OpenOffice.org-specific under
Subject: Re: 2012-02-01 PPMC Status: End of Initial Committer Establishment
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
As of the end of day, 2012-01-31, the Apache OpenOffice podling has 85
committers, with 67 on the PPMC.
Since the previous, 2011-11-17, report
authz - awaiting completion of authorizations
17 PPMC? - eligible for serving on PPMC
80 complete
25 other - special status - declined, retired, etc.
123 TOTAL
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 21:00
To: ooo-dev
For any situations of this kind, it is always appropriate to direct folks to
ooo-private @incubator.apache.org when someone has a request for which they
want discrete resolution.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Florian Effenberger [mailto:flo...@documentfoundation.org]
Sent:
If the welcome document is stored locally in the installation locally, having
it as an ODT might work.
It does mean that translations will be required.
Opening of a web page has the advantage of being able to adapt to browser
language settings on a server and also being able to update the
Subject: Re: [CODE]: Registration... menu entry in the Help menu
Hi, all! Comments in-line.
On 1/28/2012 14:23, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
If the welcome document is stored locally in the installation
locally, having it as an ODT might work.
It does mean that translations will be required
+1 on Regina's comments in general.
I think that the default owner name should be unassigned. That works fine in
other issue-management systems.
The question on what requires committer karma is one that will require more
consideration.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Regina
Can you provide a link to António's site please. If not, can you describe
whether both spellers can be installed at the same time, and how they are
distinguished? (What names are used for them.)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Marco A.G.Pinto [mailto:marcoagpi...@mail.telepac.pt]
01:55, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
If they've registered a separate language code for one or the other,
that should be the answer. Also, is the agreement just with respect to pt-PT
or does it apply to pt-BR, etc.?
Both dictionaries could be added to the same OXT, just
Is this the SMART Notebook that is being talked about?
http://smarttech.com/us/Support/Browse+Support/Download+Software (English)
http://smarttech.com/Home%20Page/Solutions/Education%20Solutions/Content%20and%20Resources
(French - Canadian)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: eric b
Don,
What's your understanding of the connection between open-source encryption
algorithms and SOPA/PIPA? Where is there more information available?
Are you talking about the encryption methods themselves or the *use* of
encryption in support of piracy. Those are different.
With regard to
It's not clear to me that the DOCX files are broken. It is that import into
OOo and LO is unsuccessful. (People will say that is because DOCX is not OOXML
but I've never seen actual evidence for that, simply the claim as a weak
justification for why DOC should be used instead. There's no
11:39
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 18 Jan 2012: SOPA and PIPA Protest Banner
Including the list this time. Watch those reply-tos, Dennis...:)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Don,
What's your understanding of the connection
implementers of the encryption provisions be
worried? Probably not.
[It may still be very sloppy law and any self-deputizing of vigilante
enforcers is a terrible notion.]
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18
@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: Has docs converter been created?
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
It's not clear to me that the DOCX files are broken. It is that import
into OOo and LO is unsuccessful. (People will say
Thank you. I found out what I needed to know by downloading both pt-PT and
pt-PT (pre-ao) versions.
-Original Message-
From: Marco A.G.Pinto [mailto:marcoagpi...@mail.telepac.pt]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 16:45
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Double dictionaries
-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RELEASE]: help wanted to define default dictionaries for languages
Hi Dennis,
On 17.01.2012 02:14, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
If you look at the localization languages that are on the current list for
built-by-AOO packages as part of a release
[mailto:a...@a-w-f.de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 04:18
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RELEASE]: help wanted to define default dictionaries for
languages
Hi Dennis,
On 17.01.2012 02:14, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
If you look at the localization languages
If they've registered a separate language code for one or the other, that
should be the answer. Also, is the agreement just with respect to pt-PT or
does it apply to pt-BR, etc.?
Both dictionaries could be added to the same OXT, just as is done for en-*, but
somehow the user has to have a way
I just downloaded the complete 70MB Zip of the complete set from the first link
on this page: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc313118.aspx.
The [MS-DOC].pdf is over 600 pages. So it is not a treat to implement from
scratch, especially with figuring out how to map into/from the
OT:
http://www.amazon.com/Allegro-non-troppo-Contrappunti-Italian/dp/8815019804/?
It is conceivable that Cipola produced the English versions himself. A number
of his papers have English-language titles.
But the Italian title, leads to these:
+1 on our own BZ Admin list.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 14:39
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
[ ... ]
I would like to discuss what the policy should become.
If you look at the localization languages that are on the current list for
built-by-AOO packages as part of a release, that effectively identifies the
*minimum* set of languages that writing tools are required for.
In addition, some of the built packages cover other languages by default simply
Take a look at this provisional page for unofficial developer snapshots started
by Jürgen today:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots
This seems like an easier place to do this. (I didn't know about it until I
saw a commit message about
I see no effort to weaken affiliation with LibreOffice. I see prominent
affiliation by participants on Apache OpenOffice with LibreOffice (and
consequently vice versa). That there are individuals on each project that find
cooperation unappealing has not hindered cross-contribution.
Perhaps
Oracle required copyright assignment and had all the rights it needed to
license the code base to the ASF. That is a different conversation than the
honoring of licenses and directing ones contributions under one license or
another.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Bjoern
+1
There is a similar situation with some JIRA systems that I work on. VERIFIED
is a nice condition. My understanding is that RESOLVED means that there is a
resolution, with FIXED meaning it has been applied, with VERIFIED needed to be
satisfied that the issue can be closed. There is still
Jürgen,
I'm going to see if I can move Drew's two images for this particular case onto
that page also. There is a cross-reference now. It would be good to have all
of the proposed images for the same use to be together for easy comparison and
mutual appraisal.
- Dennis
-Original
Pedro,
That seems like a silly reason to step down from the PPMC.
Nothing discussed here has involved a vote and it is not an ooo-private
discussion.
There is no obligation to vote on any issue and an abstention can be cast with
no need for explanation.
On a vote carried out on ooo-dev,
For David McKay, see if thegur...@apache.org is registered.
On the other hand, I would not elevate his privileges or ask that he be set up
as administrator without having his confirmation that he's still interested and
available.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir
Some externally-sourced images do not present properly in all browsers that
visit the AOO blog.
I notice this especially with IE 9 and IE 8. The root source is apparently
violation of browser privacy rules (even set to medium or low) when accessing
the image file attempts to deliver cookies
Drew,
1. I notice that Jürgen's MAC image still has Open.Office.org in places
(e.g., under the Orb and in the title of the screen). I like it too.
2. The new install images are interesting. When you are satisfied with the
set, I am going to add the applicable ones (preferably the PNGs)
Yes, the imported image works just great.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 07:55
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Images in AOO Blog Posts
[ ... ]
OK. I saved the image from the forums to disk,and
Apparently, the bugzilla-ad...@apache.org e-mail is an alias for an
infrastructure list, perhaps infrastructure@ itself. Issues that are specific
to the AOO Podling bugzilla don't reach a project designee, if there is one, in
any direct way.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From:
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving ahead with the AOO logo and rebranding
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Apparently, the bugzilla-ad...@apache.org e-mail is an alias for an
infrastructure list, perhaps infrastructure@ itself
I noticed two things in the preview:
1. It would be good to emphasize more sharply that this is for the English
Language Community Forums. Either in the title or in a simple lede.
2. The graphic is not coming through. It is evidently on the Forum site and
it doesn't seem to be including
, the blocking
continues. So there is more to it.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:apa...@robweir.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 17:24
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: EN Forum Activity Summary
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
I see the same thing when I attempt to use the Login on that QA/TestResults
page. My login is accepted but I am not shown as logged in and the Edit tab
does not show up. This seems to be very specific to that page.
- Dennis
FURTHER EXPLORATION
If I navigate to the Main Page via the
At some point it would be good to return to the use cases that are of concern
and what they represent:
1. There are extensions that are bundled in the setup that is delivered as
part of the install process for a binary release. These extensions are
installed in a specific place while the
1. I think there should be agreement on the design and not the fine
technicalities (is the font and its license, is there one or more SVG masters,
what are the crafted bitmap renderings, etc.).
2. It should also be clear what situations a particular image is intended to
be employed in to
) that are not provided in the corresponding Apache
OpenOffice release and should not be regarded as having the same provenance and
being the responsibility of the Apache OpenOffice project.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 12:17
Subject: RE: [forums] Two Branding / Migration Issues
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 18:20 -0800, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I have nothing new on this beyond the issue at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-104
and the related discussion at
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118518
I think there are three concerns regarding the substitution of ICU regexp (a
move that I favor):
1. There are whatever the internal usages are within AOO. Those don't need to
be documented externally.
2. There are the places where users may specify regular expressions,
especially in Calc
Agreed. The misconception is that the last guy to modify some code not created
by that person gets to put his license over all of it.
From that point on, there are no valid deductions.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
+1
I am not disagreeing with Drew. I am agreeing that it is important to shed
critical path wherever possible.
Because there are different contributors involved, the critical path that Drew
sees is not impacted by folks working on getting the site rebranded and
managing whatever the
+1
To be clear, I assume the discussion is about the single logo that is at the
top of the page (Example column) and made available in two download formats
(Logo-AOO-dj.tar.bz2 and Logo-AOO-dj.zip).
I also assume that it is the essential design that is being approved. There is
need for
Let's take this knot apart and work it more systematically.
1. I think there is alignment on what the logo is for Apache OpenOffice
(incubating), in terms of text with gulls. That takes care of the one main
logo.
2. With regard to branding on the web properties, and the references to Apache
I've lost track of who is keeping track of this.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: floris v [mailto:floris...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 07:33
To: ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Error message on Oracle's templates repository
The website where Oracle still hosts
There are, of course, some cautious folks who still see their incoming mail as
plaintext regardless of how it is sent. It matters, in that case, that the
plaintext rendering be sufficient for the links to the full, formatted content
to be seen and followed at the option of the recipient. The
+1
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2012 11:48
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: draft - Website migration(+) announcement - draft
Hi,
On Jan 1, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[ ... ]
1
For resiliency testing of the font-embedding provisions in ODF, I am going to
use the M+ font faces which are under a BSD-equivalent license.
M+ appears to have characters for enough Unicode points for useful testing.
This is not enough variety of font styles for a default set, though. There
I see a number of factors related to the bug report, below:
1. The high search-result placement for a pay-for-download site
2. The prospect that the download is not authentic
3. The collection of a payment for the download
It is unclear what appropriate actions are available.
- Dennis
Well, it is not a www.openoffice.org page, so the whole behavior is
interesting.
If I go from that page (with its missing formatting) to Browse an Archive, and
come back, backing into the page has it show up with the correct format.
I can also log in under my existing OOo ID and it works.
If
First, I want to congratulate Dave, Kay, Gavin, and Joe for all of the work and
no small amount of sleep-deprived nail-biting to kick off the cut-over to ASF
custody and operation of the openoffice.org static web site.
This is a big day.
The journey of the site through Apache OpenOffice
I just subscribed and everything worked.
You may need to check your spam or junk mail folder for the echo message.
Also, the spam filter at the list service may have dropped your request for
some reason. Check for a bounce message of some sort.
And yes, try again.
The response might not be
I notice that a bugzilla report on WhiteLabel Office 3.3.1 was received and
closed as invalid: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118695.
I wonder if there is something more generous that can be provided here while
the relationship between WLO 3.3.x, OO.o and AOO is sorted out.
One
-
From: TJ Frazier [mailto:tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 13:11
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Early User-QA Engagement (was RE: Ip Clearance: 1st version of Svg
replacement available)
On 12/26/2011 15:06, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I think that is a good idea
: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks!
On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
orcmid comments=in-line /
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 22:55
To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator
Subject: [WWW
Subject: Re: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks!
Exactly. It doesn't exist on Apache Infra. It's Kenai. What do we do? Do we
care? I don't. Who will change the site and how? Should it be before the
migration or after?
Regards,
Dave
On Dec 22, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I
It has to do with this page and all of the other pages like it for the lists
that each of the OpenOffice.org projects (and NL projects) have:
http://openoffice.org/projects/www/lists.
If you have an OpenOffice.org login, you will see Subscribe and (if already
subscribed) Unsubscribe buttons
monochrome icons
Hello;
--- Gio 22/12/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org ha scritto:
48 hours is too short. The
practice is a minimum of 72 hours for a lazy consensus. (I
am not arguing against your proposal.)
I have no hurry to see this in but I do have to note
?
From: Dennis E. Hamilton hims...@orcmid.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; 'Joe Schaefer' joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 2:46 PM
Subject: RE: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks!
It has to do with this page and all of the other
/.
would be welcome additions. CTR people!
Regards,
Dave
From: Dennis E. Hamilton hims...@orcmid.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; 'Joe Schaefer' joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 2:46 PM
Subject: RE: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final
and I'll respond to that now.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:34
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks!
On Dec 22, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
work.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:42
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks!
On Dec 22, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Now I'm even more
.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 13:28
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks!
On Dec 22, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
All I know is that
http://openoffice.org
301 - 400 of 1112 matches
Mail list logo
