On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.orgwrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com
wrote:
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com
Hi,
first of all, I feel sorry, that I did forward the request to this list.
Seems you feel more disturbed than than realizing the chance to help
someone with his thesis.
Regarding questions about Oracle:
I already asked Fabian if it was not better to ask about Apache, not
Oracle. He then
hi,
why can't I access this address
http://tools.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/
thanks
mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com
tel:54747
Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8,
Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193,
P.R.China
Hi all,
The forums not reachable, at least to me, on address
http://user.services.openoffice.org
Somebody knows why?
Thanks,
Zoltan
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:50:41 +0200
Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu wrote:
The forums not reachable, at least to me, on address
http://user.services.openoffice.org
Somebody knows why?
Not reachable here either, Zoltan, for at least the last 36 hours. A posting
on oooforum.org notes
Hi,
I am building frequently on Windows 7 using the Microsoft Visual Studio
2008 Express together with Microsoft SDK for Windows Server 2008.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 28.09.2011 01:15, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi at all
To ensure that the code is buildable on any System, we should have
I'm working on a local copy. So far I haven't changed much code in the
extension. The extender is a separate project, because it could be be
used without the extension.
Given time I'm planning to add a better code editor. But first I have
to overcome some idiotic problems in Eclipse.
Greetings
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'd recommend supporting Windows XP and beyond. XP is officially
supported by Microsoft until April 2014. I'm certainly not making
any effort to maintain or test support for earlier versions. Of
course, that doesn't
Hi,
on http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html it is said:
quote
Asking Questions
Please submit questions to the Legal Affair Committee JIRA space.
/quote
Thus, I expect that people from the Legal Affair Committee will response.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 28.09.2011 04:13, Shao Zhi Zhao
Hi,
Eike posted on 2011-09-11 that this service has stopped working - see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201109.mbox/%3c20110911141738.gc15...@kulungile.erack.de%3E
But, I have no answer for the question why this service is gone.
Best regards, Oliver.
On
Probably the machine was turned off. You can see the source here:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/DEV300/summary
also in Apache:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
Eike posted on
Hi Jean-Philippe
Thanks for highlighting the need for IA2 support in AOO.
I agree that IBM offering the Symphony support for the IA2 [1]
accessibility API will 'potentially' make AOO available to a much
wider user base by providing vital support to NVDA and other assistive
technology running on
Hi,
i am not really new here and be one of the initial committers but i would
take the opportunity to let you know that i got the chance to work fulltime
on the project in the future as an IBM employee.
After 14 years with Sun and Oracle and working on the OOo project since the
beginning i was
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Sep 28, 2011 3:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So total silence. Is that the best we can come up with?
One problem is that what is being asked for here is a voluntary time
commitment. Typically volunteers don't want to
Already published on users ML
- Mail transféré -
De: drew d...@baseanswers.com
À: ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org
Envoyé: Mardi 27 Septembre 2011 22:27:54
Objet: Re: Forum outage
OK - quick update - received an email from Andrew R. at Oracle a few
minutes ago and he is working to get
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So total silence. Is that the best we can come up with?
hopefully not
I'll sign up for the next post, planning on one related to the IP
review of AOOo, to give the reader some sense of what we're doing and
why we can't
On 28 September 2011 07:33, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote:
2011/9/28 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net
Hi,
first of all, I feel sorry, that I did forward the request to this list.
Seems you feel more disturbed than than realizing the chance to help
someone with
2011/9/28 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
Hi,
i am not really new here and be one of the initial committers but i would
take the opportunity to let you know that i got the chance to work fulltime
on the project in the future as an IBM employee.
Hi Jurgen, great to see you coming
Op 28-9-2011 8:58, Rory O'Farrell schreef:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:50:41 +0200
Reizinger Zoltánzreizin...@hdsnet.hu wrote:
The forums not reachable, at least to me, on address
http://user.services.openoffice.org
Somebody knows why?
Not reachable here either, Zoltan, for at least the last 36
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 12:00 +0200, floris v wrote:
Op 28-9-2011 8:58, Rory O'Farrell schreef:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:50:41 +0200
Reizinger Zoltánzreizin...@hdsnet.hu wrote:
The forums not reachable, at least to me, on address
http://user.services.openoffice.org
Somebody knows why?
Hi Jürgen,
first off, glad to hear you stay with our code the ecosystem! :)
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
From my point of view the reasons for the fork are not longer
valid and it should be possible to continue one project, one
office together.
I don't believe it's helpful to start a discussion by
On 20.09.2011 16:36, Pavel Janík wrote:
Have we ever considered using version control to...uh...manage file
versions?
Just an idea.
Maybe Heiner will say more, but in the past, we have had the external
tarballs in the VCS, but then we moved them out and it worked very
well. There never was a
On 28 September 2011 11:53, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.orgwrote:
Hi Jürgen,
first off, glad to hear you stay with our code the ecosystem! :)
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
From my point of view the reasons for the fork are not longer
valid and it should be possible to continue one
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Sep 28, 2011 3:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So total silence. Is that the best we can come up with?
One problem is that what is
2011/9/28 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So total silence. Is that the best we can come up with?
hopefully not
I'll sign up for the next post, planning on one related to the IP
review of AOOo, to give the
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi at all
To ensure that the code is buildable on any System, we should have
frequently builds on any system. I ask here who does frequently builds, and
on wich system.
Normaly I make one build per day if I see same
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I don't think the vendor support lifetime for a consumer OS has bring the
end of application support on that OS. What is known is that there will
be further service packs, maybe not even OS security patches, but
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
on http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html it is said:
quote
Asking Questions
Please submit questions to the Legal Affair Committee JIRA space.
/quote
Thus, I expect that people from the Legal
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Matt Richards mricha...@gmail.com wrote:
heh, when did that happen? Must have missed the email about the ooo-issues
list.
ooo-issues was created when the podling was initially created. Since
it was part of the initial configuration, like ooo-dev, there was
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 12:28 +0100, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 28 September 2011 11:53, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.orgwrote:
Hi Jürgen,
first off, glad to hear you stay with our code the ecosystem! :)
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
From my point of view the reasons for the fork are
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
first off, glad to hear you stay with our code the ecosystem! :)
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
From my point of view the reasons for the fork are not longer
valid and it should be possible to
or why not just shake hands and part as friends.
Of course we can but that makes inefficient use of the resources and is less
good for Open Source in general. Fine strategy if we had thousands of
developers in each project and a MS size budget.
Two projects and two applications.
- if AOO
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 13:05 +0100, Ian Lynch wrote:
or why not just shake hands and part as friends.
Of course we can but that makes inefficient use of the resources and is less
good for Open Source in general.
Well, as you can guess I disagree - it's only inefficient if one
doggedly
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
It is still early enough to reunify the code base and use the well
known brand OpenOffice for a binary release. It would be the best
choice for our users.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but binary releases bearing that
name can only be made by the ASF, or can
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
It is still early enough to reunify the code base and use the well
known brand OpenOffice for a binary release. It would be the best
choice for our users.
Please correct me if
Hi,
I will now join the folks who are working on the clean up regarding
non-Apache license conform stuff.
Looking at the wiki - http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration -
provides some low-hanging fruits for me for a start.
I will create patches for the following Apache license
On 28 September 2011 13:31, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 13:05 +0100, Ian Lynch wrote:
or why not just shake hands and part as friends.
Of course we can but that makes inefficient use of the resources and is
less
good for Open Source in general.
Well,
On 28 Sep 2011, at 13:45, Rob Weir wrote:
If you have a specific proposal for use of Apache-owned trademarks,
then you are welcome to submit it to this list. We can then review,
discuss and make a recommendation to Apache branding.
I believe it was Juergen who was proposing this, not
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 09/27/2011 08:58 PM, schrieb Jean-Philippe MENGUAL:
Hi Jean-Philippe,
As ordinary blind user, I work very much to promote OOo and
accessibility free software for blind people. The current problem is
that public
On 28 September 2011 13:45, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
It is still early enough to reunify the code base and use the well
known brand OpenOffice for a binary release. It
Am 09/28/2011 03:03 AM, schrieb Maho NAKATA:
From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmannorwittm...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: Introduction and start working
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:08:01 +0200
Hi Nakata Maho,
thanks for the welcome.
Until last Friday I had a 21 iMac PowerPC on my home desk, but now it
Hi,
Very interesting answer, thanks:
I say 'potentially' as the developers in the community will make it a
priority if, and only if, it is clear there is a strong demand for IA2
and someone leads the work and use of it. So I would encourage you to
continue your work of letting us know of
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 September 2011 13:45, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
It is still early enough to reunify the code
2011/9/28 Jean-Philippe MENGUAL mengualjean...@free.fr
I will try doing that. But I'd like to mention one problem and several
elements which make me think I represent an enormous part of users who want
IA2 to be integrated. The problem is that I have feedbacks essentially from
France or
Hi;
There was an interesting cross-posting by Malte Timmermann
not long ago:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201109.mbox/ajax/%3c4e6dc5c3.9050...@gmx.com%3E
I am not suggesting it should be done now but perhaps
committing accfixes2 would help the IBM IA2 integration.
Slightly off-topic.
Wasn't there going to be a proposal from the Forum community regarding moving
the Forums to Apache Infrastructure?
I recall activity on the the CWiki about it, but nothing has happened here to
move the process forward.
Regards,
Dave
On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:28 AM, drew
Wasn't there going to be a proposal from the Forum community regarding moving
the Forums to Apache Infrastructure?
I recall activity on the the CWiki about it, but nothing has happened here to
move the process forward.
The proposal is still in progress. There is still no agreement on if
it
FWIW;
I don't like the patches because I can't really examine well
the code, besides this is something the VCS handles acceptably:
commit the original sourcecode and then apply the patches in a
different commit. If we start with up to date versions there
would not be much trouble.
just my $0.02,
Hi Oliver-Rainer;
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
I will now join the folks who are working on the clean up
regarding non-Apache license conform stuff.
Looking at the wiki - http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration -
provides some low-hanging fruits for me
Hi there!
There is now no one anymore activly maintaining the EIS server, EIS
software and EIS database.
At Oracle some of my duties where just these tasks but I now have no
longer access to this service.
It may have worked some time without maintenance but now it´s gone.
That means that
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 September 2011 13:31, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 13:05 +0100, Ian Lynch wrote:
or why not just shake hands and part as friends.
Of course we can but that makes inefficient use of
Jürgen,
Herzlichen Glückwunsch!
Regards,
Dave
On Sep 28, 2011, at 1:50 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
i am not really new here and be one of the initial committers but i would
take the opportunity to let you know that i got the chance to work fulltime
on the project in the future as an
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
If TDF wants to take the AOOo source code and build it, with or
without enhancements, and release it under the name LibreOffice for
use with Linux distros, then they are welcome to do that. They need
no additional
I come back to the point that if division is intrinsically good, why not
fork Inkscape, Audacity, Gimp, etc etc.
GIMP has been forked for quite some time... Read up on the history of
CinePaint (formerly known as Film GIMP) and its disagreements with
GIMP. Here the reasons for the fork were mostly
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
2011/9/28 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
You would need to open a JIRA ticket with Infra, to request names.
Maybe start with a call on this list for
Hi there!
There is now no one anymore activly maintaining the EIS server, EIS
software and EIS database. At Oracle some of my duties was just this but
I now have no longer access to this service.
It may have worked some time without maintenance but now it´s gone.
That means that neither the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
2011/9/28 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So total silence. Is that the best we can come up
On 9/28/2011 11:58 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
...snip...
Andy Brown and I volunteered to be Admins for the blog. Here are the steps to
become an author.
Thanks, Dave!
One note: once the podling gets some more posts out there, we'll likely
also need volunteers (with accounts on blogs.a.o) to
Am 09/28/2011 10:50 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
i am not really new here and be one of the initial committers but i would
take the opportunity to let you know that i got the chance to work fulltime
on the project in the future as an IBM employee.
Congratulations for the new job at IBM and for
On Sep 28, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
2011/9/28 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
You would need to open a JIRA ticket with Infra, to request
On Sep 28, 2011, at 2:38 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 28 September 2011 07:33, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote:
2011/9/28 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net
Hi,
first of all, I feel sorry, that I did forward the request to this list.
Seems you feel more disturbed than
Hi Bern;
From what I read, I don't think we want to get into all that
complexity right now. We have enough work already developing
OpenOffice to start developing something like EIS from
scratch :-(.
Perhaps there something opensource already that we can use to
some of the EIS functionality?
I
Am 09/28/2011 01:39 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I don't think the vendor support lifetime for a consumer OS has bring the
end of application support on that OS. What is known is that there will
be further service
If you mean ODMA.h, I don't believe there is any dependency on it and you
should just get rid of it.
If you need to deal with it as third-party code, I can get you a version with a
BSD-variant license that applies, although the header itself has not been
touched. AIIM approved the license
Am 09/28/2011 09:13 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 09/28/2011 01:39 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.orgwrote:
I don't think the vendor support lifetime for a
Well... now that I think about it ...
The linux header (which is actually an GNU iconv header),
can probably be dealt without too. The MIT licensed header
in XFree86 is not on X.Org anymore so they did something
about it.
Is OOo on a opengrok anywhere? It would be good to see where
such headers
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If you mean ODMA.h, I don't believe there is any dependency on it and you
should just get rid of it.
If you need to deal with it as third-party code, I can get you a version with
a BSD-variant license that
The problem with bringing the 3rd party software completely into the SVN tree
and modifying it in the tree has to do with the license the updated software is
under. In that case, there *is* a code provenance issue and I believe it
crosses a line that the Apache Software Foundation is unwilling
On 19.09.2011 02:27, Rob Weir wrote:
1) We need to get all files needed for the build into SVN. Right now
there are some that are copied down from the OpenOffice.org website
during the build's bootstrap process. Until we get the files all in
one place it is hard to get a comprehensive view
On 27.09.2011 04:36, Carl Marcum wrote:
As of Repo version 1175305 I can Build on Fedora 14 and 15 x86_64.
Thank you Ariel for helping me get the first one completed.
I found that there is a problem trying to to build hsqldb using java 1.7
due to the build.xml only having targets for java up
Am 09/28/2011 03:47 PM, schrieb Jean-Philippe MENGUAL:
Hi,
Very interesting answer, thanks:
I say 'potentially' as the developers in the community will make it a
priority if, and only if, it is clear there is a strong demand for IA2
and someone leads the work and use of it. So I would
The idea (not originally mine) is to have keep only compatible
licensed code under an isolated (3rdparty) directory.
I think on the long run we should try to use the system versions
of such software when available, and every linux/bsd distribution
is probably doing that for LO already.
Pedro.
ODMA.h would not be a contribution to Apache. It would be an updated file with
a BSD-license adaptation notice and an AIIM Copyright Notice. (Only my
urologist gets to do cavity searches.)
If I spiffed up the files and reference code that are actually needed to have a
production-quality
What is not obvious in the survey is that the answer to the first question
apparently branches you to a different remainder of the survey. It also
doesn't even consider folks who contribute to both projects until near the end.
I have communicated my feedback on the survey itself privately.
Marcus,
I share your thinking about this.
If you or Oliver or someone can put a recent successful trial build where I can
get my hands on the installer version, I will be happy to perform
platform-confirmation installs. This would help me set up a routine for doing
that kind of QA in the
On 28.09.2011 17:32, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
FWIW;
I don't like the patches because I can't really examine well
the code, besides this is something the VCS handles acceptably:
commit the original sourcecode and then apply the patches in a
different commit. If we start with up to date
Christian--
Can you supply an update to whatever is going on on this wiki page?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Community+Forums
The issue Terry refers to has been closed and the response is confusing to
me, but perhaps it makes sense to someone else.
After my panic about
On 28.09.2011 21:52, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Is OOo on a opengrok anywhere? It would be good to see where
such headers are used.
this one still seems to work:
http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok
there is also this one, but of course it has a rather different source
tree so such
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Well... now that I think about it
...
The linux header (which is actually an GNU iconv header),
can probably be dealt without too. The MIT licensed header
in XFree86 is not on X.Org anymore so they did something
about it.
X.Org uses git and
Am 09/28/2011 11:56 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Marcus,
I share your thinking about this.
If you or Oliver or someone can put a recent successful trial build where I can
get my hands on the installer version, I will be happy to perform
platform-confirmation installs. This would help me
It is unlikely that machine-generated files of any kind are copyrightable
subject matter. I would think that files generated by Visual Studio should
just be regenerated, especially if this has to do with preprocessor
pre-compilation, project boiler-plate (and even build/make) files,
EIS seems to be dead.
some months ago somebody (and i'm too lazy to dig up who to thank)
uploaded a dump of the CWS data here, guess that's all we have now:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1792694/cws.ods
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
It is unlikely that machine-generated files of any kind are copyrightable
subject matter. I would think that files generated by Visual Studio should
just be regenerated, especially if this has to do with
On 09/28/2011 04:41 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 27.09.2011 04:36, Carl Marcum wrote:
As of Repo version 1175305 I can Build on Fedora 14 and 15 x86_64.
Thank you Ariel for helping me get the first one completed.
I found that there is a problem trying to to build hsqldb using java 1.7
due to
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
It is unlikely that machine-generated files of any kind are copyrightable
subject matter.
I'd imagine that Pixar, for instance, would have a problem with that
blanket statement...
The very existence of this
On 09/28/2011 01:29 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Carl Marcumcmar...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to gauge the interest in including Groovy [1] as a scripting
language.
For those not familiar, Groovy is a dynamic language for the JVM that
includes
I want to know since when is the wiki in the apache server been on the
server. Is there any plans to sync it with the one on the
wiki.services.openoffice.org.
I got some ongoing work and would need to sync it down to the apache
location at ooo-wiki.apache.org.
Regards
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
I'll stand by my original statement.
I'm not going to get into the Pixar case since it doesn't apply here.
The Bison manual may have license conditions on what can be done with the
generated artifact, but I suggest that is not about copyrightable subject
matter in the artifact. A similar
The only reason for testing the installer on Win32 platforms older than Windows
2000 is to find out how they fail. If they don't fail that is interesting too,
but I understand it is not part of any agreed support. If they fail, they
won't be fixed.
I guess Oliver is our source for fresh
FWIW;
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
...
If you mean ODMA.h, I don't believe
there is any dependency on it and you should just get rid of
it.
If you need to deal with it as third-party code, I can get
you a version with a BSD-variant license that
Is there a way i can test de OOo CSS skin on the apache implementation?
I had been tweaking to the current theme of the site. Also would be doing some
custom imaging.
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
...
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:42 PM,
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
It is unlikely that machine-generated files of any
kind are copyrightable subject matter.
I'd imagine that Pixar, for instance, would have a problem
with that
blanket statement...
Right,
So Odma.h cannot be in the grant, of course.
The #include in odma_lib.hxx is only used for the type definitions, since the
entry points need to be something that can be bound to pointers in a LoadLib of
odma32.dll, and odma_lib.hxx does that. The usage is perfectly fine, even with
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.comwrote:
Alejandro;
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Is there a way i can test de OOo CSS
skin on the apache implementation?
I had been tweaking to the current theme of the site. Also
would be doing some
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:47:10 -0500, Alexandro Colorado
j...@openoffice.org wrote:
.
Ok I create INFRA-3970, feel free to add yourself to it. I would need
to
verify the version of the OOo's BZ vs the one in Apache (which I
think is
the latest). -- Anyone knows?
4.0 (or so it says in the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I'll stand by my original statement.
I'm not going to get into the Pixar case since it doesn't apply here.
I did not say it applied to the Visual studio generated cruft... I
merely commented on the blanket
96 matches
Mail list logo
