Did you review this page:
http://wiki.opencog.org/wikihome/index.php/EquivalenceLink
Most of what is done there is done without the LambdaLink ... but then,
that wiki page was written before LambdaLink existed, and the vairable
scoping is implicitly assumed.
If you expect PLN to manipulate these
ke Error at opencog/atoms/cmake_install.cmake:36 (file):
> file INSTALL cannot set permissions on
> "/usr/local/include/opencog/atoms/NumberNode.h"
> Call Stack (most recent call first):
> opencog/cmake_install.cmake:37 (include)
> cmake_install.cmake:38 (include)
; detector gave way too many false positives Having a degree lets
> us tune a threshold denoting what is salient enough to bother doing
> anything about...
>
> ben
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Oops, hit
Perhaps these papers will help clarify the nature of physical law, raised
in the emails below:
Axel Kleidon
Non-equilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in the Earth
system
http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgc-theory/uploads/Pubs/2009-NaWi-AK.pdf
-- or other writings by Kleidon e.g.
seems to be working now ... "server resource overage" -- was it DOS'ed?
Something else? --linas
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Ruiting Lian
wrote:
> http://wiki.opencog.org/ seems not usable now. Can anyone who has the
> account fix it soon? Thanks.
>
> "
> The web
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Gaurav Gautam wrote:
> (use-modules (opencog exec))
There error message
mentions /home/gaurav/Codes/AI/OpenCog/WORKSPACE/AtomTypes/links.scm but
you did not say what it contains.
--linas
--
You received this message because you are
Add to the pattern
(InheritanceLink
(VariableNode "$color")
(ConceptNode "Color")
)
and
InheritanceLink
(ConceptNode "British")
(VariableNode "$man")
)
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Gaurav Gautam
Re pattern mining in general:
The vision I had for pattern mining had more to do with observation, than
with exploration. So, for example, a child watches an adult perform some
task, and tries to copy that performance. Its easier to find out what's
important by watching many performances: one
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:32 AM, 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog <
opencog@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Shujing,
>
> I might start hacking the pattern miner on the master soon. Once I do that
> there's is no coming back, I mean that merging the pattern miner from the
> PatternMinerEmbodiment branch
slash-dot? Hmm, I wonder if the slashdot.org domain name is available.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Gaurav Gautam wrote:
> Hi
>
> How about simply calling it root? Even better just /. Read it as root but
> always
> write it out as /.
>
> The message being: CogPrime is
arn various shades of
> "in", which could allow it to learn 1000s of context-specific senses
> not just 75 ...
>
> ben
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The below is an old presentation, from 2009,
The below is an old presentation, from 2009, but its the first I've seen of
it. Its long, I have not read it yet. However, I suspect that it
probably says good things (I hope; else that would be something else that
CYC did wrong...)
Hi,
I'm currently re-starting an old project to induce grammar in opencog,
it is described here:
http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Language_learning
I'm still at the very early stages. If you can share the Tamil corpus,
I could start running it through the pipeline and share the results;
I would need
However, that example should be changed to load all modules that it
needs, instead of leaving the user to guess what needs to be done.
Its not a very user-friendly example.
Perhaps you could try to do this?
Ideally, one should be able to just run "guile -l someexample.scm" and
have it just work,
It looks like you did not actually define node1 before using it.
--linas
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Vishnu Priya wrote:
>
> Hi Nil,
> Thanks.
> I also got an exception when i typed the following line in scheme as in
>
>
Yeah.
pattern mining ... placing on my todo list.
--linas
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Matthew Ikle wrote:
> Hmmm. I’m wondering if this is another project I could assign to my AI class
> to provide some preliminary experimentation.
>
> —matt
>
>> On Feb 8, 2017, at
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 7:59 AM, 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog
wrote:
>
> The spread of the second order distribution shrinks as more evidence
> accumulates, so it depends on the number of observations. There is a
> function to translate the count N (number of
d KB is just
>>> the wrong thing to be doing...
>>>
>>> For instance he notes they have had to add 75 kinds of "in" to handle
>>> different sorts of "in" relationship ... but doesn't question whether
>>> it might be smarter to have th
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Ed Pell wrote:
> All three of my answers did not come from inference. They came from a
> lifetime of experience with cats, boxes, and mice. It was 90% memory bases
> with maybe 10% logic/inference to gue the pieces together.
>
I suppose. A lot
this emergence
>>> occures contains the ability of auto organisation (not self organisation,
>>> because at this stage there is no self that could do organisation).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Die
Unless you are running some learning algorithm then nothing at all is being
learned.
--linas
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:34 PM, wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> According to, https://github.com/opencog/opencog/tree/master/opencog/
> nlp/chatbot,
> if i am not wrong, currently
Sure. Not sure what to say. The human brain certainly has the ability to
perform affine transformations at 60 frames per second. Presumably, babies
learn how to do this by moving their heads around, and seeing how the
visual input changes. I'm not a physio-psychologist, but if i recall
unproductive, and just doesn't lead
anywhere. Its not interesting, its not constructive, it doesn't solve any
of the current problems in front of us.
--linas
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Ben Goertzel <b...@goertzel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Linas Vepstas &
Hi Nil,
> Observe that the triple above is an arrow: the tail of the arrow is
>> "some subset of the atomspace", the head of the arrow is "the result of
>> applying PLN rule X", and the shaft of the arrow is given a name: its
>> "rule X".
>>
>
> Aha, I finally understand what you meant all
now.
--linas
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Ben Goertzel <b...@goertzel.org> wrote:
> Linas,
>
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Today, by default, with the way the chainers are designed, the various
> &
well, its hard to guess where it is, without a backtrace. You should add
these lines to your `~/.guile` file:
```
(debug-enable 'backtrace)
;;; Record positions of source code expressions.
(read-enable 'positions)
```
I believe that the above should be enough to pinpoint the issue.
--linas
ip back
to PLN, and that misses the point of it all.
-- linas
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > And so here is the blog post -- its a lightly reformatted version of this
> > email, with lots of links to wiki
Sigh. I guess the catch was suppressing the print. The following will
print this:
https://github.com/opencog/opencog/commit/251baccce6cb51bea92bdce5771d2be87fdd9e6b
--linas
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 5:00 PM, wrote:
>
>
> My .guile file is as follows :
>>
>
>
Here: this commit should fix this problem (and Nil's original problem)
https://github.com/opencog/opencog/commit/260f95a01af82ff47b56bfa4405a9dcca6b4d7ef
--linas
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:44 P
Hi,
You appear to be compiling some stunningly ancient version of opencog. I
don't know how you did that. Where did you find this beast? How did you
find it?
You should go to github, and follow the instructions there.
--linas
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:41 AM,
Yes, good point. I will add that.
--linas
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Ed Pell wrote:
>
> Linas, I would added a third model other. The three would be self, world,
> other. Where "other" my have two versions a generic other (person) and many
> copies of specific other
Ah! Now we're getting somewhere!
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:55 AM, wrote:
>
> I just took a simple sentence "apple is fruit"
> ---> (nlp-parse "apple is fruit")
> ---> (parse-get-r2l-outputs (ParseNode
> "sentence@2ac41081-45a2-44c6-aae4-a95451a9ae21_parse_0"
> (stv 1
Attached is a pre-pre-draft of a description of what the current
embodiment-language system does, including a walk-through of the current
code, and how that code could be extended.
It might be that I am too early in sending this out, and I should have
written more first. C'est la vie. Release
What Ben said -- you should run your data through the NLP pipeline.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:50 PM, wrote:
> Hi Linas,
>
>
> (EvaluationLink
> (PredicateNode "sentence, location and body")
> (ListLink
> (EvaluationLink
> (PredicateNode
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:28 AM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my ~/.guile has
>
> (use-modules (ice-9 readline)) (activate-readline)
> (add-to-load-path "/usr/local/share/opencog/scm")
> (add-to-load-path ".")
> (use-modules (opencog))
> (use-modules (opencog query))
>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:12 AM, wrote:
>
> So should i post this segmentation fault in github?
>
Sure. It would be better if you fixed it!
>
> --Thanks
> Vishnu
>
>
>
>>
>> :-(
>> OK, so .. here's the deal:
>>
>> -- Clearly, the segfault is bad, and needs to be
Yes, git-rebase sounds like it could work. If you manage to get it to work,
please create a pull request. I'd like to review and merge it.
--linas
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:37 AM, wrote:
> Thanks Linas for the reply.
>
> yeah!!! i can copy the contents of pattern
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
> when i did ldd -r /usr/local/lib/opencog/libquery.so, i got few
> undefined symbols, which i think probably linkage errors.
>
> undefined symbol: _ZN7opencog14EvaluationLink15do_eval_scratchEPNS_
>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 8:36 AM, wrote:
>
> Thanks Linas for your reply. Actaully, it guides me well !! :-)
> One more question!
> My data has timestamps and latitude, longitude info along with text. Is
> it still possible to get the data into opencog?
>
Sure. You
uot;)
(ListLink
(TimeNode "Fri Aug 26 18:18:56 CDT 2016")
(ConceptNode "51.9244° N")
(ConceptNode "4.4777° E")
)))
which allows you to use the same location in multiple sentences. You can
inv
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Ed Pell wrote:
> Linas, does it pump into the atomspace or into a working-memory-atomspace?
>
It does not seem like information you want to retain for the long term.
>
Right. We don't have any particularly clear-cut answer on this; it remains
Hi Ed,
Yeah, well, there is opencog (cog prime??) the abstract architecture, and
opencog the actual code base. I presume that the abstract architecture can
be mapped to various nifty algos. (e.g. scatter-gather map-reduce type
broadcasting that you allude to) although figuring out how to do this
laces to look if you are a
> long time project participant but it is confusing to the uninitiated.
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I was not aware we even had a docs.opencog.org ... perhaps you are
>
The cog-incoming-set will return all links that contain some given atom.
>From this, you can build simple utilities that do what you want. In fact,
many of those simple utilities have been built. See
cog-get-partner cog-chase-link cog-get-link cog-get-pred cog-get-reference
Look in the file
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Vishnu Priya
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying the following:
>
> As sentences come in, it should go through NLP pipeline i.e. parsed by
> Relex and should be stored in DB automatically.
> Because i can't manually do all the time giving
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Vishnu Priya
wrote:
>
> Thnaks Linas for the reply.
>
>
>> I would like to know some more info about Truth values.
>>
>
> How is atom's truth value is updated based on new observations?
>
They are not. Only PLN updates TV's and some
A better design would be to explicitly acknowledge that words have
meanings. The way that this is currently done looks roughly like this:
(EvaluationLink
(PredicateNode "is")
(ListLink
(ConceptNode "apple@meaning-42")
(ConceptNode "fruit@meanning-66")
)
)
I hope the above
Hi Ben,
Can you explain why you need to have a ChineseWordNode?
A simpler solution is to use EvaluationLinks, as normal:
e.g.
EvaluatinoLink
PredicateNode "Cantonese"
ListLink
WordNode "jau mou wifi-aaa"
which has the same form as marking the tense, number, mood, etc.
Rule.h
talking about a work-around to ScopeLinks -- perhaps that is a good
starting point. What is it that you want to do, and why is the scope link
preventing you from doing it?
--linas
> Nil
>
> On 11/17/2016 05:13 AM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
>> Look, if there is a bug, open a b
eNode "ppp")
(PredicateNode "qqq"))
(cog-execute! g)
;; returns the expected result. What is the problem?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 5:34 AM, 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog
That makes the problem harder. You still have to somehow deal with
different word-senses for "apple", and in addition, you also need to create
a a model of the mental state of id1. So, if id1 is a child, the
word-sense for "apple" and "sweet" is probably different than if id1 is an
iphone fanboi.
itial learning curve.
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The pre-HEAD docker containers are here: https://github.com/openc
>> og/docker/tree/master/indigo which contains a sequence of containers,
>>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
>
>
> > x1 utters verbally/says/phonates/speaks x2.
>
> for each Lojban word So he is simply facing the small programming
> task of translating these definitions into sets of English sentences,
> i.e. in the above
Not sure I understand the question.
You can use WordNet to look up synonymous words/phrases. it has perl,
python, java and other APIs.
NLTK is in python only but its a huge swiss-army knife of tools.
Perhaps you want to create a lojban parser? There are probably
off-the-shelf solutions for
Hi Matt,
haven't forgotten about your bot, its here I have to find a moment.
I don't know what Senna is using but there are a bunch of
wikipedia-article-parsing & management scripts here:
https://github.com/opencog/relex/tree/master/src/perl U sed to use those
scripts to strip out html markup,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Apil Tamang
wrote:
> This page begins with the following statements:
>
> Using C++ for opencog is possible, but not generally recommended. This is
> because the whole point of OpenCog is to represent knowledge in terms of
>
Nil,
Can you explain the intent of ImplicationLink?
You made it inherit from ScopeLink, thus making the variables in it
implicitly scoped. Then you added the file ImplicationLink.cc, and have
notes in there, complaining about how variables are implcitly scoped. The
wiki page for it,
I can't reproduce it wither, but the error message is clear:
no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘opencog::NodePtr {aka
std::shared_ptr}’ to ‘opencog::AtomPtr& {aka
std::shared_ptr&}’
It this automatically for us, but not for jenkins .. a different compiler,
maybe? Or a different version of
eis...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Are these unit tests still failing?
>
> Nil
>
>
> On 10/11/2016 08:36 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
>> 47 unit tests fail ... I'm not sure if they all fail for the same
>> reason, though.
>>
>> For example PutLink
>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:48 AM, vishnu wrote:
>
>
> With attention values, i thought i could do the following:
> I have 24x7 tweets coming. So i thought, I can send them to NLP pipeline
> and get Atoms. Let's say most of the people tweet about Presidential
> Election.
nse in some way?
--linas
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> OK, I'll defer the conversation. Sooner or later, Amen will open another
> bug report once again titled "question: feature or bug?" and I guess we can
> de
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Nil Geisweiller <ngeis...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 10/12/2016 06:55 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
>> Well, yes, but Nil,, look at the core issue: the variable X in the
>> Implication link is bound, but the unit test is pr
12, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Nil Geisweiller <ngeis...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> OK, when they fail again I guess you might feel free to push to the
> master, as we're apparently using as a dev branch, and then I'll fix that.
>
> Nil
>
> On 10/12/2016 06:17 PM, Linas Vepstas wro
Oops I forgot the URL
http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/~girard/0.pdf its from 2001
I suspect that there are later, more approachable/readable intros to
the topic from other authors. The wikipedia coverage sucks, though.
--linas
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Apil Tamang
wrote:
> Trying to open a pull request didn't work for me.
> I guess the repository is
> locked (and for good reasons, I'm sure).
It should not be ... it should just work. I crawled through the
github admin menus
they should all be in /usr/local/lib/opencog
Did you run 'make install'? I'm pretty sure that none of the scheme
modules work, until you install them.
--linas
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Shujing Ke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone know is there a file or somewhere that
well, the error message is very precise .. can you figure out why you can't
copy that file?
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Nageen Naeem wrote:
> yes installing as root screen shot is attached
>
> On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 8:04:31 AM UTC-7, linas wrote:
>>
>> did you
I extended the wiki page http://wiki.opencog.org/w/GlobNode to describe how
to control the number of matches being made. Let me know if this is what
you wanted, if this is enough.
--linas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To
did you remember to install as root?
--linas
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Nageen Naeem wrote:
> Hey,
> I'm installing OpenCog, during installing "Cloning and building MOSES"
> I got an error in make installation and the error snip is attached to it,
> please give me a
Hi Nil, Hi everyone,
Sorry, yes, its intentional, got discussed in a meeting here last week,
and therefore "everybody knew about it" ... except, of course you :-)
To recap, this is https://github.com/opencog/opencog/pull/2641 which
resolves a circular dependency between opencog and the
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There can be modalities (which are usually expressed as diamonds or boxes
> (operators) in modal logic):
> DUTY_TO_PERFORM_ACTION(agent, action, time horizone) - agent should
> perform action within time horizon
>
Here:
this page tells you about how to repesent the internal state of other
speakers (this includes beleifs, demands, ettc.)
http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Claims_and_contexts
---linas
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:51 PM, 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog <
opencog@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> PLN doesn't have any rule to reason about AssociativeLinks. To have some
> we'd need to define its semantics.
>
I think they're called association links.
It might be interesting to have a demo
There are many ways of doing this. The simplest one is probably this:
(EvaluationLink
(PredicateNode "Vishnu's special ID43")
(InheritanceLink (stv 0.9 0.9)
(ConceptNode "Einstein")
(ConceptNode "man"
which is conceptually the same thing as
(VishnuSpecialLink
dogs can fly".
And then there is premonition, because that wiki page was written before
Pumpkin jumped out the window of the moving car and broker her leg...
--linas
>
> ben
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> &
thing for someone to do, and then write associated
> unit tests.
>
> -- Ben
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Alex <alexander153...@gmail.com>
> wr
formulas to
> work sensibly for these modal-logic operators (belief, etc.). That
> part was solid and I remember it. But the choice of link types he
> used, I don't remember well and would need to revisit... probably
> you're right that it needs revisiting...
>
>
>
> On Wed
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:10 AM, 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog <
opencog@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I'm not extremely familiar with the NLP code, but I think it can already
> produce such knowledge (probably as implication links without variables,
> but as explained here
Hi Adam,
My personal instinct is that a human-curated KR system is kind-of
pointless. Let me explain why. I've actually tired to create one several
times now, and have been dis-satisfied with the results.
The first time, I thought Icould do it with "semantic triples" --
subject-verb-object type
Hi Ben,
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> So e.g. if we find X+Y is roughly equal to Z in the domain
> of semantic vectors,
>
But what Jesus is saying (and what we say in our paper, with all that
fiddle-faddle about categories) is precisely that while
My quick, informal gut-feel sense of this is that the right answer is to
replace "vector" part of word2vec by that *actual data structure* that
*actually occurs in language". It's kind of hard to explain how to do
this, but let me give it a whirl.
Note how vectors are "symmetric", in the sense
Hi Alex,
I'm hoping for a two-prong approach for some of the simpler stages of what
you talk about: hand-coded rules, for now, to get some things going, and
then also some automatically-learned ... uhh .. things.
The hanson-robots chatbot consists of multiple parts, some of which are
very
That's exactly it! --linas
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Vishnu Priya
wrote:
>
> I tried like this and it worked !! :-)
>
> echo -e "(define out (open-output-file \"/opt/opencog/file.txt\"))\n(write
>> (nlp-parse \"hello world.\") out)\n(close-output-port out)\n"
well, we have a pile of python bugs that need fixing...
-- linas
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Nived Narayanan wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm Nived doing my junior year in IIT Madras. I am an open source
> enthusiast and have done courses in machine learning and
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Misgana Bayetta
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Alex wrote:
>
>> OK, I followed with updated tutorial https://github.com/opencog/ato
>> mspace/tree/master/examples/rule-engine/chaining and I
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Alex wrote:
> Well, the mentioned book has chapter about inheritance, but it is in no
> way connected with the terms of intensional and extensional inheritance.
> So, this book is not usable.
>
Sure, its usable. Opencog inheritance is
s: source Universe and target
> Universe. And even when we reach target Universe, there are options to
> define ambiguities of a single target expression, I agree.
>
> So the question we have to ask when we seek for *a* semantics of an
> expression should have the following form: What
Maybe the (List) should have been a node?? At any rate, cog-fc should check
its arguments for validity, before proceeding.
--linas
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Vishnu Priya
wrote:
>
>
> I installed the recent version and tried FC. Previously i used to work
>>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Daniel Gross wrote:
> so i wonder where is the meaning in this kind of machine . -- if the
> semantic graph is actually constructed out of the machine learned parse of
> natural language text without a predefined mapping to a semantic graph
>
Ivan, I mostly agree (superficially) with most of what you are saying, but:
I notice you avoid or over-simplify the issues mentioned in the wikipedia
article "upper ontology". The points are two fold: different human beings
have subtley different "upper ontologies", they tend to change over time,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:34 PM, AT wrote:
> It is quite obvious we are not really in OpenCog territory here
Why would you say that? The current coding task, in opencog, is to write
the code that can perform the things that you describe, that I talk about.
Although all
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Daniel Gross wrote:
> In context of A one morphism may hold, in context B another -- and you
> indicated two kinds of contexts, ) domains (swimming, rowing) and
> human-introspective-valueladen interpretive context.
To return to Alex's
I assume that this is a bug somewhere, in the example, or wherever, and Nil
is the one to look at it. If this is in regard to a block of code in some
examples directory, open a bug report. If you want to be totally awesome
then track down the bug, and provide a patch?
--linas
On Fri, Apr
I don't know that book but it's probably adequate.
Opencog contains a potpourri of ideas from logic, prolog, lambda calculus,
relational algebra. There's usually several ways to solve any problem in
opencog. Many or most of the link types in opencog are not used for basic
KRR, but are there to
Semantics and syntax are two different things. Syntax allows you to parse
sentences. Semantics is more about how concepts inter-relate to each other.
-- a network. A sentence tends to be a quasi-linearized walk through such
a network. For example, take a look at the "deep" and the "surface"
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Daniel Gross wrote:
> Hi Linas,
>
> How do you propose to learn an ontology from the data --
>
The simplest approach is to simply read english-langage sentences that
encode an ontology: for example, an early version of MIT ConceptNet
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Gross wrote:
> Hi Linas,
>
> Thank you for your responses, and the pointer.
>
> It seems to me that your example further pin-points my question:
>
> A quasi-linear walk through a semantic network is essentially a
> constructed
Containers?
I also do not want to clobber my current system install, and so I
frequently use containers (lxc or docker) for running foreign
environments. This may be too much to ask for pasberry pi, and migh be
daunting if you are not yet familiar with lxc or docker (they're not hard,
but it
while you are defining modules, you are in a module context, and that is
confusing. Best to work at the top level, and not inside of any module at
all.
(for c++ this would be like calling main inside of a function ... it would
just be .. weird)
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Alex
What Ben said. And some other remarks
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 4:31 AM, wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There can be modalities (which are usually expressed as diamonds or boxes
> (operators) in modal logic):
> DUTY_TO_PERFORM_ACTION(agent, action, time horizone) - agent should
>
1 - 100 of 793 matches
Mail list logo