qfe (same hardware, different package) are supported
on x86 yet. These two are CRs 6342827 and 6401215.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757
stable, and
documented facility, such as FMA or SNMP. Getting the right answer
though costs far more than getting an expedient and fragile one.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR0
oreground. That's unlikely to be what you want. It'll block the SMF
start method from completing, and when that times out, it'll go into
maintenance state.
Remove the '-d' (just use syslog for debugging) and you should be
fine.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Netw
.
But if you have an S10 subscription, then talking with your Sun
representative about the features you want to see in future updates
would probably be the best approach.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71
n is simple:
>Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC
[...]
> Can anyone please let me know where I can find SUNWlucfg package?
There is no SUNWlucfg package on Solaris 10 Update 3. It first showed
up in Solaris 10 Update 4.
Just install SUNWluu and SUNWlur, and continue with your upgrade.
--
James
l will become 36GB in size once the 18GB drive is gone.
That's all there is to it.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burli
in the first place ...
> Thus anyone know where the WEP key is kept in Vista ... is the question.
Google seems to suggest this:
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/wireless_key.html
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive
ort that virtual instance
> into xVM Server.
Neat idea ... though I think you need PSARC 2008/597 'vdiskadm', which
doesn't seem to have integrated just yet.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.
restore operation.
This list is rather high-volume, and doesn't necessarily have all (or
any) of the Xen folks subscribed. You may want to consider contacting
the Xen OpenSolaris community:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/xen/
irc://irc.oftc.net/solaris-xen
[EMAIL PROTEC
spec = speculation();
speculate(spec);
trace(execname);
ustack();
}
fbt:winlock:lock_giveup:entry
/arg1==1/
{
commit(spec);
}
fbt:winlock:lock_giveup:entry
/arg1!=1/
{
discard(spec);
}
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAI
right or not, is someone's words against mine, but this
> matter is so farking significant enough that someone with the real power to
> effect "change" should be aware of it.
Forward the message any way you like. The email address should be
obvious. If it isn't, then feel f
s Solaris 8 6/00 and Solaris 10/00 respectively. I
> can not find anything earlier other than Solaris 8 beta CDROMs and thus I
> think that WOS version of "s28_38shwp2" is the lowest common denominator.
Actually, that stamp is put there by ON build, not by the WOS. :-/
--
James C
Bill Shannon writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > Is there still a problem here in the networking component itself
> > (other than the GUI)? If so, I'd like to help solve it.
>
> No, after configuring it all by hand, networking is working fine.
> The question is
we ever did it) would
essentially imply legal advice, "beware the bandersnatch ... and oh,
yeah, GPLv2 as well." If we're going into that business, why not go
all out and provide full legal services? Why is this one special case
encoded in the system architecture?
Obviously, I jus
... do you have that
installed?
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
___
o
any interfaces that claim to do hardware
checksum offload just don't work.)
As for the static network configuration logic, there's nobody working
on that, so it's static.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Driv
27; service and reenabled
the 'physical:default' one, the rest of the networking system works
exactly as it has for many, many years on Solaris.
Thus, if you're running into trouble here, and if you're already
familiar with that system (enough so that you consider it "easie
nfiguration error.
Do you have 'hosts' and 'ipnodes' set to 'files dns' in
/etc/nsswitch.conf? If not, then do this:
# cp /etc/nsswitch.dns /etc/nsswitch.conf
Do you have DNS server addresses from your ISP configured in
/etc/resolv.conf? If not, then you&#x
t nge"
... there'll be a lot of it, but it should show error counters
increasing if there are low-level problems.
How old is the software you're using? There were serious problems
with 'nge' quite some time ago -- bad enough that I gave up and
plugged in an old 3c509 car
vailable.
Another option would be to upgrade to Solaris Express Community
Edition.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA
the
> Network admin GUI working to allow me to configure the network?
No idea; contact the desktop group.
As for the complexity, this is why we strongly recommend using DHCP
for configuration. That's what it's designed to do, and it makes
things much simpler.
--
James Carlson
tuck.
For now, most folks are told either to bury a private copy (ick!) or
use libtecla instead.
> > libnet-1.0.2,REV=2004.04.08_rev=a-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> I don't know what this is and don't see anything obvious
> in nv_98.
PSARC 2008/409. It's presumably
n/stories/news/0,4586,2345514,00.html
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
___
the least capable configuration -- usually half-duplex.
Thus, the paradoxical result of "forcing" full-duplex on one side of
an Ethernet link is that the other side drops to half-duplex, and you
get a lot of errors and dropped packets.
That might not be your problem (looking at stat
folder.
Does this help?
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/ds/zfs.jsp#1
The directory entry limit is documented as 2^64. In practice, you'll
likely run out of other things before you get there.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystem
Tai writes:
> P.S. And how would I know which OpenSolaris version I am running?
This should tell you what you want to know:
% uname -v
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS U
d.
> How about JDS marketing?
> Is there plan to go away from JDS name and use in all place GNOME?
I'm not sure that's on-topic for any OpenSolaris list (why would Sun's
marketing be an open source issue?), but if it is, I'd guess that'd
also be something for the des
program for it
If you've got the ISO file, then something like this should do it:
% pfexec cdrw -C -i solaris10.iso
There's also 'cdrecord,' which is a more feature-rich recording program.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
il than that, you'll need to explain exactly what
drive you're mounting and on what kind of system, what commands you've
tried, and what error(s) you've seen.
We can't see your system from here.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hout an engine restart.
3. Using simple arithmetic to arrive at interval deltas is simpler
and more effective anyway, so there's just no need.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442
at boot.
Similarly, creating those files will cause an interface to be plumbed
at boot. (You can have as many as you like configured this way.)
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS
nfig rtls0 plumb
> I might have to do a
> re-install and see what I can do. Only problem is my install images were
> on that server so I'll have to download the dvd again on my 0.5Mb
> dsl...oh joy
I wouldn't expect reinstall to change anything. That's an
administrat
can be looked at by
> the experts?
bugs.opensolaris.org
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
what I was going to
recommend -- along with filing a bug. (I would have recommended a
trusty old Intel PPRO [e1000g] or 3COM [elxl] card, but that RTL8139
[rtls] should work as well.)
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Netwo
I'll see if i can come up with any more info
Make sure you file a bug on it.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-27
d enough that I
plugged in an old 3c509 card to deal with it -- but it hasn't happened
in quite a while.
> What could be happening?
Most likely driver problems.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232
existing S9 system to S10, preferably using
Live Upgrade (since it seems you have at least one spare disk slice).
If you want to copy over to a new system anyway, I think you're
probably on your own.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems
least. Better would be to put a stake through it during the day
when it's safe.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 0180
> have been done because of, say, a motherboard failure. I think I rmember
> seeing it can be done even without the export?
That's true. It "just works." The export step is needed just to
remove that pool from the previous machine.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
istrator installed the
patches he claims to have installed.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
_
t's in the SUNWCsma cluster -- SUNWsmmgr
SUNWsmagt, and SUNWsmcmd packages.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757
x27;d suggest contacting Sun's support group for
further help in obtaining patches and maintaining your system.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212
download restrictions. ANY
> IDEAS
Finding out what went wrong with those earlier trials might help point
out what to do in the future.
(Unfortunately, this might not be the best place to get help with
Windows programs ... but perhaps someone else will add some clues
there.)
--
Jame
ving, it
sounds like that (misconfigured name services) is a possible source of
the problem.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBU
David Clack writes:
> If you come up into single user mode and do a chmod 777 /, everything
> starts working again.
Yikes.
> If anyone could explain what the real permissions for / are, I'd love
> to here from you.
755 and root:root.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
t
that there are other things that are more pressing and it'll happen
eventually. You'd find out more by talking with them.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232
many more ways to hurt yourself.
- I'm not so sure SVM does a great job using incrementally-added
drives with RAID-5 ... I seem to recall needing to set up a
concatenation of RAID-5 volumes in order to get it to work well.
(But my memory could be faulty there. I mostly just don&#
w, and I
haven't noted any loss of control over the root file system, or
problems with having the file systems grow.
Please clarify: what are you trying to do, what do you expect to see
happen, and what problem are you encountering? Be as specific as
possible.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networki
#x27;t necessarily give you 64-bit binaries, and a 32-bit
compiler doesn't restrict you from producing valid 64-bit binaries.
What matters are the options used.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox
lans.
The current 2008.05 CD has the beadm command and does not have the lu*
commands.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 7
o go if you want to talk about planning issues related to one
vendor's distribution. The right folks might be listening here, but
they might not. It's a wide-ranging and noisy list.
(In general, I'd say that the more targeted a list you can find, the
better off you'
staller (the graphic portion)
eventually led to the current Indiana work. That's why SXDE is
finished.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-
Kill off the /usr/lib/inet/in.mpathd process and restart it
manually with the "-d" flag to enable debug. This will print all
of its activity in excruciating detail on standard output.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Micros
wn process
rules generally forbid us from removing things unless there's a viable
replacement -- even if the existing one is rotting away.
(This one is probably a more extreme example than most.)
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems
general use.
As I would with SXDE, I'd recommend that users of SXCE make use of LU,
so that -- if something *does* go south for some unforeseen reason --
they can roll back to a previous working environment.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Micro
.
> Don't you think this is the same issue ?
It certainly looks like it. It was fixed in Solaris 10 by patch ID
123324-01, which was released about two years ago.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W
quot; and "zfs receive" commands.
> Also, would it more efficient if I just mirrored the two drives?
It might be slow and difficult, given that one is USB. Transferring
sounds smarter to me.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsy
uding names of parties and terms. :-<
That's why there's no helpful list of organizations to blame in the
sad list of "encumbered" sources.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/no_source/
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun
Rich Reynolds writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > No. As previously mentioned, we do not have the right to publish the
> > source. It belongs to someone else. It will _never_ be open.
> >
> that said - LARGE portions of the LiveUpgrade system are simply shell
> scrip
e right to publish the
source. It belongs to someone else. It will _never_ be open.
Sorry.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fa
series of builds code-named "Nevada," and a project "Indiana" that
produces a distribution out of those bits.)
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Bur
em (including an
incorrect default), file a bug on it. Go ahead and work around the
problem until a fix is found (of course), but don't alter your
lifestyle to assume that everything around you is infested with bugs.
It's not.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EM
of thing would be in
the Indiana project team. They're removing *ALL* of the old LU stuff,
and would likely be happy to discuss the new installer and boot
environment manager, and how it works.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35
> I still trust the defaults; it's much more likely that you've seen
> additional lookups even using that same name, especially when running
> snoop.
It's possible that the previous poster is seeing reverse lookups
... and it's also possible that he modified "hosts&
do so, we move software out to the right
place.
This takes time. It can't be changed overnight because you have to
chase down dependencies and make sure you're not going to break
anything by the move and because it does require some work to change
the packaging, and we don't have that
cation within a range specified by the network administrator.
If you're using static allocation, then either (a) update
/etc/nwam/llp to specify static allocation for the IP address or (b)
turn off NWAM and use the old-style /etc/hostname.* files. If you're
using DHCP, it should generally
a
> 15 bytes files.
> any idea what i am doing wrong?
That's a known temporary problem with the web site. If you look at
the contents of the file, you'll see that it says "File not found."
I hope the broken link will be fixed soon.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
> file or directory]
'pkg search' indicates that /lib/cpp comes from SUNWlibms. Do you
have that package installed on this system?
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS U
oesn't support SPARC. But the
SX:CE is built from essentially the same source code.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fa
om people here are *NOT* necessarily the
support folks paid to do that job (and thus pretty much like all those
with [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses), and the answers might not apply to the
release you happen to be running, then go ahead and ask here.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
omes up with a bunch of packages, but
> none of the un-installed ones look relevant. Is it one of the headers
> that isn't opened yet ?
No, it's definitely open source. It's just not packaged.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
usly, other distributions
based on the OpenSolaris source code can do as they see fit, but I'd
expect most to follow suit.)
Basically, /usr/sfw was a mistake. When we realized that, we fixed it.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
rt
services with Sun's commercial Solaris 10 product, then I suppose it's
fair to ask for problem reports submitted however you're willing to
give them.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Netwo
ment has happened
> in this area :(
I haven't seen any talk of it. It might be better to start a
discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than on this
list.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vo
. The harder one avoids a reboot. First, plumb up
everything, then list the results:
% pfexec /sbin/ifconfig -a plumb
% /sbin/ifconfig -a
The second command should show an Ethernet adapter plumbed. Once you
find the name (something like "rtls0"), do this:
% pf
irectory names
> > and symlinks ... if it's done well.
>
> Understood and agreed. Hence the "complicated" comment. However a logical
> directory structure makes things quite a bit more simple for a packaging
> system
> to handle.
I'd just say it
than just directory names
and symlinks ... if it's done well.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
__
Mr. Z writes:
> Is there a keyboard command to switch between workspaces? I'm using OS
> 2008.05.
Click on "System" -> "Preferences" -> "Keyboard Shortcuts."
Workspace switching is near the bottom of the list.
--
James Carlson, Solaris
ings that someone has tested and reports to work.
Things not listed are not necessarily known to _not_ work.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757
installed on S9.
For one thing, your preinstall scripts are gone.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
t; and "device" values, which you should report
to the folks who maintain the driver. The right mailing list for that
is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No, if the driver doesn't want to load, you can't "force" it to load.
Drivers load only when they recognize the attach
ftware should be installed. Can someone point me to an Open Source A/V
> application that I can install and run on OpenSolaris?
Good luck on that. Unless you're scanning for viruses in Windows
files that you're storing on your OpenSolaris system, I don't think
such a thing re
k you very mcuh.
OpenSolaris comes with "pkgadd." If you have a common application
already in System V package format, just run "pkgadd" to install it.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71
em is the grub loader itself, and it causes a "can't
mount root" panic early in boot.
There are many references to this problem in the archives, but the
short answer is that you need to run:
/boot/solaris/bin/update_grub
or use installgrub to reinstall the booter using the lates
this should fix the problem:
% pfexec pkg install SUNWscp
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-275
em to S10.
If you're going to do a regular system upgrade from S9 to S10, why
wouldn't the packaging information for your unbundled software be
expected to remain intact?
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive
defined, the leading edge is definitely _already_
OpenSolaris. Besides the fact that all of our own development is done
there, you might want to check out sites such as www.joyent.com --
businesses that are running it in production _today_.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EM
quot;ISO image."
> I want to install this in my desktop. My sys is having pentium dual core and
> 1GB Ram Shall i proceed to install. Is their any precaution to be taken
> before installing the OS.
Unless you're planning to purchase support from Sun for S10, I'd
recomme
it.d/gswgdaemon /etc/rc3.d/S99gswgdaemon
ln -s ../init.d/gswgdaemon /etc/rc0.d/K00gswgdaemon
See the /etc/rc3.d/README file for more information.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442
蓖申藺___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Moinak Ghosh writes:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:39 PM, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No matter _what_ packaging mechanism is used, that's a tall order. I
> > certainly don't blame anyone for not tackling it. I suspect it might
> > no
27;m missing the point, but I thought that's exactly what the
OpenSolaris distribution (and IPS repository) folks were attempting to
do.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR0
ing it. I suspect it might
not be fixable in any real sense at all.
Merely adopting RPM or any other random packaging technology won't fix
the dependencies that are built into the binaries that are being
delivered. Packaging is just a container.
For me, the right solution is to throw more disk sp
ne are on
the mark, though. Besides lofs, a better way to do this is with zfs
and delegated datasets.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N
ve
ld-linux.so.2 and the other required libraries installed.
If you're trying to run a Linux application in a native Solaris zone,
that's not going to work.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W
soft.html#openoffice
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
___
open
ve run into the same problem that many others have run
into. The updater is supposed to update the grub booter, but
doesn't. You need to boot into the previous environment, mount up the
new one and run $ROOT/boot/solaris/bin/update_grub.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <
Wonchang Song writes:
> But! some strange error occured.
> Next is error message.
> cc: 筝___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
irtual memory subsystem?)
DLPI just has nothing to do with BSD sockets. That's the root
problem.
> Sufficiently recent versions of SXCE/SXDE/Nevada/OpenSolaris have
> libdlpi (see the man page for this and for the individual functions) which
It's also in progress now for
I recall
correctly) host itself. It's a good proof that you've got all of the
virtual details right, and can be useful in debug, but you're right
that the usual PC-type environments just don't bother going that far
... and probably need not do so.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Ne
101 - 200 of 1013 matches
Mail list logo
