I suggest you remove all files in include/openssl/, then rebuild.
The reason for your problem is that the distribution contains a bunch
of symlinks, like this:
lrwxrwxrwx openssl/openssl 0 2011-02-08 18:13
openssl-1.0.0d/include/openssl/opensslconf.h - ../../crypto/opensslconf.h
On
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:17:00 +0200 (CEST),
Dhaval Rao via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Platform: OpenVMS
rt Query: I can see that OpenSSL could be built on
rt OpenVMS Alpha VAX.
rt Is OpenSSL supported on OpenVMS Itanium (IA64)
rt platform. If not, could you
[Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket
database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte]
[And I did it wrong the first time. Appologies for the dupliactes]
Hi Richard,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
[guest - Thu Oct 6 11:55:10 2005]:
[Additional note to get the proposal itself into this ticket's history]
From: Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:24:58 +0200
Subject: Proposal for symbol versioning of openssl
Hi folks,
openssl has evolved to a very important library in Linux distribution. A
lot of
Kamalesh Nandi via RT writes:
I was trying to build openssl-0.9.7e in Windows Visual Studio 2005 Beta2
Environment. I was getting an error. But the same openssl-0.9.7e builds fine
in Windows Visual Studio 2003 Environment. Is there any additional steps to
be performed specific to Visual
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:30:40 -0700, nagendra
modadugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nagendra It turns out that the Version field was omitted from the
nagendra HelloVerify message in the internet draft. The document
nagendra will be corrected.
So the bug report can be
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e
rt it fails with:
rt
rt ..
rt + gcc -shared -o libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-soname=libfips.so.0.9.7
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:51:46 +0100 (MET), Jens
Elkner via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt 'Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:'
rt
rt
rt In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:18:35 +0200 (METDST), Andreas
M. Kirchwitz via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi,
I just found an email discussion that seems to cover what's happening
to you:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-glibc/2000-01/msg00046.html
rt On Solaris,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:44:56 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt This may be old news, but there is a typo in openssl.cnf included with
rt the latest version of openssl that will error out the cert creation.
rt
rt line 46 is:
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:30:44 -0700, Lev Walkin [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
vlm Marcus Carey via RT wrote:
vlm Windows 2000
vlm MS VC++ .NET
vlm OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004
vlm
vlm
vlm FILE *fp;
vlm X509 *cert;
vlm
vlm
vlm fp = fopen(SomefFile,r);
vlm cert
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:46:35 +0200 (METDST), Roman
Pletka via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt | Your patch is flawed. At that point, there has been a test to check if
rt | ctx-buf_len is non-zero already, and an error is generated if it is.
rt | At the point of your
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 21 Jun 2004 08:49:26 +0200 (METDST), Tim Rice
via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt The FIPS stuff needs a little tune up.
rt
rt Makefile.org
rt - if ! egrep 'define OPENSSL_FIPS' ..; then \
rt + if egrep 'define OPENSSL_FIPS' ...; then \
rt +
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:56:12 +0200 (METDST), Stefan
Farfeleder via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt the functions get_cryptodev_ciphers() and get_cryptodev_digests() should
rt set the pointer *cnids to NULL rather than the first member of the array
rt nids.
Why?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:58:00 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt On June 11, 2004 03:00 am, Jack Lloyd via RT wrote:
rt Summary: Threaded applications using the AEP engine break badly
rt on Linux.
rt
rt I see. The problem seems
If you could please send the new patch as an update to this ticket
(for example by replying to this message and making sure it reaches
[EMAIL PROTECTED]), that would be the best way.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 7 Jun 2004 21:33:49 +0200 (METDST), Green,
Paul via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, Fiel, what's up with this? The last post in ticket 862 shows that
you acknowledged the bug has been fixed, and now you send in the
*exact* same bug report again?
I'm killing this ticket, as I assume it was a mistake...
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:23:29 +0200 (METDST), Simon
Josefsson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rt
rt I'm honestly very unsure about this one. After all, openssl ca
rt already covers this, so I wonder why
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:51:13 +0200 (CEST), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
levitte In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:23:29 +0200 (METDST),
Simon Josefsson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
levitte
levitte rt
levitte rt Richard
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:33:59 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Libeay32 linked fine. I got the problems when linking ssleay32. It
rt complained about 2 unresolved symbols. I ended up copying the
rt asn1_lib.obj line from the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:00:24 +0100 (MET), Stephen
Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt [levitte - Fri Feb 27 00:04:45 2004]:
rt
rt I noticed the EVP_dss1() hack, and am pondering about something a bit
rt mkore generic. Could you test if the following
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:09:07 +0100 (MET), Stephen
Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt The workaround we use is to #undef these first in the relevant header
rt file but as the OP reports this only works if you #include windows.h
rt (which includes wincrypt.h)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:42:51 +0100 (CET), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
levitte In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:32:26 +0100 (MET),
Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
levitte
levitte rt If windows.h is not
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:40:26 +0100 (MET), Dave Roberts
via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt It also copes if they have the same Serial Number as well.
The only way to cope with that situation is to return an error. The
serial number must be unique for each
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:31:16 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt fixed it by adding #include e_os.h to crypto/des/des_locl.h
rt and adding a link ../../e_os.h in include/openssl/
It's better if you add a '#include ../e_os.h'
-
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:20:47 +0100 (MET), OpenMacNews
via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt the following changes seem to cure the problem ...
rt
rt (EDITOR) Makefile.org
rt @ 304
rt --- -compatibility_version ${SHLIB_MAJOR}.`echo ${SHLIB_MINOR} | cut
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 29 Nov 2003 13:17:26 +0100 (MET), Stephen
Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Unless you feel some compulsion to look into this I'd rather
rt handle it myself.
Go ahead, my compulsions lie somewhere else right now :-).
-
Please consider sponsoring
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:38:04 +0100 (MET), Andy
Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt Now, the really cool thing would be if someone (you?) could provide us
rt with some sh code that identifies 64bit HP/UX so we could set that up
rt in the script
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:42:39 +0100 (MET), Jeffrey
Altman via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt The inclusion of e_os.h in crypto\des\cfb_enc.c must be specified as
rt either
rt
rt #include openssl/e_os.h
Absolutely not!
rt or
rt
rt #include ../e_os.h
I'd
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:46:42 +0100 (MET), ho k via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt Dear
rt
rt I would like to ask may it possible to downgrade to
rt lower version of openssl if my system has already been
rt install openssl-0.9.7c
There's no problem with
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:34:49 +0100 (MET), ho k via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt It is because of compability problem with existing
rt program. May I delete libcrypto.so and libssl.so, then
rt restore the lower verion for downgrade clearly.
If your programs
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:59:47 +0100 (MET), ho k via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I have concern that just as MS-windows, the newer
rt version file can be overwrited by the elder verion
rt ones. Is it true for program running on unix
The Unixly installation does it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:36:20 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Also, line 8 of ui.pod needs a comma on the end, I keep finding them.
rt Also, this is kind of cosmetic and makes it easier, but in des_modes.pod
rt could you change the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:01:19 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt That's an OK solution, but what are the feelings towards those
rt commas? Are those left out on purpose or were they typos?
They were typos, and have already been
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 28 Sep 2003 04:44:29 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
rt
rt I applied your changes to 0.9.8-dev and 0.9.7-stable. Thank you.
rt
rt Ticket resolved.
rt
rt
What's the *real* problem here? krb5.h should only be included of
OpenSSL has been configured to build with Kerberos, something you
currently have to configure explicitely. If you get inclusion
problems in spite of not having configured OpenSSL to use Kerberos,
please send us a log of your
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 5 Jul 2003 08:24:45 +0200 (CEST), Frédéric
Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups That's pretty much what I asked from the beginning, the
groups possibility to use ERR_set_implementation and to have ERR_FNS
groups public. But because of (if (!err_fns)) on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 4 Jul 2003 00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups The problem is the following, yes your code (ERR_pop_to_mark/ERR_set_mark)
groups is fine when a child function is adding a new error, however, what happends
groups when it calls
OK, what stops you from creating your own implementation table and
fill that with whatever you want, and give that as an argument to
ERR_set_implementation(). I know, it means you have to look in
crypto/err/err.c for each version to see if there's been a change to
ERR_FNS. Guess what? It
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:09:05 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups As I said earlier, you don't have to implement it, however
groups that would be nice if you could make the cutsom error handling
groups code work, which would allow me to implement
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:51:58 +0200 (METDST), Bob
Hepple via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I am busy porting OpenSSL to the Eracom hardware engine and have run into
rt a problem when entering PINS (ie using fgets() without echo). Thought I'd
rt share the workaround
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:21:49 +0200 (METDST), Charles B
Cranston via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt Possible bug in OpenSSL 0.9.6h on Solaris 2.8 with /dev/urandom
rt
rt The rsa command fails strangely when attempting to use
rt both -passin fd:int and -passout
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:23:17 +0200 (METDST), Matthew
Fleming via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I am using openssl v. 0.9.7a. I have compiled static libraries and am
rt trying to create an application that links to those libraries. I am
rt developing with Visual
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:15:51 +0100 (MET), via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt ld: error: libc.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/libdl.so, conflicts with
rt libc.so.5
Eeeep, looks like you have a dirty installation...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:46:04 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt All the tests run fine until the final apps/openssl version -a
rt
rt
rt make[1]: Leaving directory
rt `/usr/local/src/openssl/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030323/test'
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:51:20 +0100 (MET), Alexey
Semenov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I'll try as soon as fix will be available with new release -
rt 0.9.7b I suppose.
I'd like to ask you to please consider fetching
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:34:52 +0100 (MET), via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt ./config shared
rt
rt make test fails as we use LD_LIBRARY_PATH
rt
rt The Makefiles in ./ and ./tests set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to `pwd`
rt rather than `pwd`:$$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
rt
rt Is this a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:16:25
+0100 (MET), Alexey Semenov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt try ./config shared no-engine, then compile.
rt Apache 1.3.27/mod_ssl crashes with segmentation fault.
rt if i remove 'no-engine' - all ok,
rt linux 2.4.19/gcc 2.95.3/glibc
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:18:45
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt Hi,
rt
rt I'm using the latest (0.9.7) Crypto lib to encrypt a string of clear
rt text, by using CBC mode with IV preset to 8 bytes of 0x00.
rt When the encrypted text was decrypted
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:36:54
+0100 (MET), Holger Sesterhenn via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt PKCS7_sign() uses SMIME_crlf_copy() to assure '\r\n' at EOL before signing.
rt BIO_write() is used. Does BIO_write() use the C library? If it does, we
rt have the same
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:50:06
+0100 (MET), Bodo Moeller via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt A second theory is that OpenSSL should always clear the error queue by
rt calling ERR_clear_error() if stuff left in the error queue might cause
rt confusion later.
The problem
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 31 Jan 2003 04:59:36
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt [steve - Thu Jan 30 20:44:34 2003]:
rt
rt However no version of OpenSSL will currently display that correctly.
rt
rt This isn't very friendly and proper IPv6 support will be added
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:33:24
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Actually, I'd prefer that I wouldn't have to relink and
rt redistribute my application every time a security patch comes out
rt for OpenSSL. I haven't seen any issues in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:40:24
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Currently, on many Unix platforms I link my application against
rt libssl.so and libcrypto.so. Typically, these are links set to resolve
rt down to the versioned types of these files,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:26:40
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Current version,
rt openssl-0.9.7, does not support shared libraries on AIX platform.
rt
rt To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:01:39
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt rt To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
rt rt treatment? I mean SHAREDFLAGS being hardcoded directly in Makefile.org?
rt rt Just wondering...
I just test, with OpenSSL 0.9.7a-dev (fresh checkout), the command to
generate a self-signed cerificate according to the example in
x509.pod:
openssl x509 -in cert.pem -addtrust sslclient \
-alias Steve's Class 1 CA -out trust.pem
I expected it to fail because it wouldn't find those
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:49:31
+0100 (MET), Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I've analysed this further and the cause seems to be that it bcc 5.5
rt complains about taking the address of a structure that doesn't have a
rt complete definition.
rt
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:43:26
+0100 (MET), Jimmy Cheng Sze Ngee via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Problem had been resolved. Thanks.
OK. Thanks.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52
OK, I've hacked a little. Please try the following patch on a 0.9.7
snapshot, and put the attached openssl-shared.txt in doc/:
Index: Makefile.org
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/Makefile.org,v
retrieving revision 1.154.2.49
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:57:59
+0100 (MET), Ricardo Ariel Gorosito via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt [openssl-097-snap 2002-12-28 build on RedHat8 with MIT's krb5 libs]
rt
rt When I try to build packages that include ssl.h, it fail on:
rt
rt ---START
rt In file
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:26:48
+0100 (MET), Jeff A. Earickson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt No, you can assume that I've been on vacation for the week.
OK, my appologies, and I hope you had a good vacation.
Can you do a test run on the latest snapshot, please?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 26 Dec 2002 22:38:42
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Richard! How come this ticket made to 0.9.[78] STATUS? The question was
rt originally about 0.9.6h[-engine] and the issue is not relevant in
rt 0.9.[78] context.
Because I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 24 Dec 2002 16:59:34
+0100 (MET), Verdon Walker via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt This does not seem to have shown up in the contributions area. Are we
rt still waiting for an update or did something go wrong?
Something went wrong, index.html wasn't
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 24 Dec 2002 18:46:47
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt $ ./tx509
rt testing X509 conversions
rt p - d
rt p - n
rt p - p
rt d - d
rt n - d
rt p - d
rt d - n
rt n - n
rt p - n
rt d - p
rt n - p
rt p - p
No error, eh? Can you try to download
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 24 Dec 2002 21:57:42
+0100 (MET), Mohler, Bruce via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt test BN_sqr
rt Square test failed!
rt
rt In the test sub-directory, there is an output file called tmp.bntest. The
rt very end of that file contains:
rt
rt print test
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 20 Dec 2002 22:09:03
+0100 (MET), Jeff A. Earickson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
rt 0xc002ea68 in kill ()
rt (gdb) backtrace
rt #0 0xc002ea68 in kill ()
rt #1 0xc002de2c in raise ()
rt #2 0xc00282a8 in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 23 Dec 2002 15:14:46
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Danm! The very same thing happened to me earlier! You have to 'find .
rt -name lib -size 0 -exec rm {} \;' if you delete libcrypto.a. Sorry:-)
rt Alternative is to start from
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:01:40
+0100 (MET), Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt * lots of messages during 'make depend' apparently from the pre-processor:
rt ../util/domd .. -MD makedepend -- -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DL
-DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5
The problem is when an EDIV will produce a negative quotient from the
division of two positive numbers. An example is the following call:
q = bn_div_words(0xC0171716, 0xAB9A, 0xC0171717);
q is supposed to get the result 0x. Unfortunately, the way
the numbers are handled to
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from slim.vsm.com.au (slim.vsm.com.au [150.101.13.2])
by brev.stacken.kth.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA25429
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:57:05 +0100 (MET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from vsm.com.au by vsm.com.au
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:03:14
+0100 (MET), amjad qurum via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt dear sir
rt i had the following error while trying to run the
rt OPENSSL on my sun solaries 8 server .
The error shown means you don't have a C compiler installed. I'll
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:17:52
+0100 (MET), David Asher via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt ummm... I think you sent this to the wrong person... I reported the bug.
Don't worry about it. You're the registered requestor, that's why you
got a copy directly. Andy is a
I can see that happening. Would the following patch help?
Index: ssl/ssl_ciph.c
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/ssl/ssl_ciph.c,v
retrieving revision 1.33.2.3
diff -u -u -r1.33.2.3 ssl_ciph.c
--- ssl/ssl_ciph.c 19 Jul 2002
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:24:09
+0100 (MET), Jeyalakshmi via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Please resend those questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This kind of post does not belong in our request tracker (the
intention of the request tracker is to track down bugs in OpenSSL,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
rt -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
rt -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -c hw_cryptodev.c
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:36:15 +, Joe
Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jorton Ah, I've found this in sys/param.h:
jorton
jorton #define OpenBSD 200105 /* OpenBSD version (year month). */
jorton #define OpenBSD2_9 1/* OpenBSD 2.9 */
jorton
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:36:56 -0500, Rich
Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rsalz If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the
rsalz code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error
rsalz is generated. How much does that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:24:39
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Could someone verify independently that SSL_CERT_FILE doesn't
rt allow reading certificates in non-default locations?
I can verify, by looking at the code, that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:08:25
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I can go and cripple the engine.pod documentation if absolutely necessary,
rt but it simply seems a somewhat shortsighted solution (even if
rt alliterative :-). IIRC
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:24:30
+0100 (MET), Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt The existing code could be fixed to handle other cases, for example by
rt dumping that BIO_gets() replacing with a BIO_read() loop and converting
rt the buffer in place.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 2 Dec 2002 22:30:20
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Ah, that is a good point in the case where we saw
rt this, the source bio was a bio_s_mem, i.e. a memory
rt bio, so it was not doing r text-mode eol
rt translation. In
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:48:27
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt happy to try the attached file ... as soon as you attach it!
Don't use any of them. It still doesn't work for all numbers. EDIV
is very hard to use for divisors that it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 1 Dec 2002 01:02:16
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt It seems as if you have answered your own earlier suggestion to me. I
rt can confirm this. With OPSNSSL_NO_ASM defined true BETA 4 builds, tests
rt and works with WASD OK
The vms.mar I sent you had a small but important bug. Please try this
one instead.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex
I just started working on making symlinks for all names in the NAME
section of every .pod file we're converting into manpages. The
benefit is that the manuals are available by function name, and users
won't have to try to guess the name of the manpage any more.
Applying some changes on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:35:29
+0100 (MET), Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 03:23:02PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
wrote:
rt
rt I just started working on making symlinks for all names in the NAME
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:56:16
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Builds OK on
rt
rt Compaq C V6.4-005 on OpenVMS VAX V7.3
rt Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS VAX Version V5.3
rt on a VAXstation 4000-60 running OpenVMS V7.3
rt
In message 001601c2940a$deed1b60$06a8a8c0@dell8200 on Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:43:12
-0600, pobox [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ghstark What will the current implementation of thedecompressor in
ghstark OpenSSL do in each of these cases?
Unless this can be determined, it can be tested by having several
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:32:30
+0100 (MET), Jeffrey Altman via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt What is the appropriate size for 'buf' in DSA_size()?
rt
rt 4 bytes is certainly not correct. My guess is that we want to support at
rt least 256 bits and so it needs to
Heimdal support is not, unfortunately. I once tried to do a port, and
what you see is the result as far as I came. Unfortunately, I didn't
get all the way, there are some things I wasn't able to map. MIT KRB5
and Heimdal differ more than one might expect.
So, perfectly honestly, Heimdal
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:23:17
+0100 (MET), Wieckowski, Tom via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Can't locate strict.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
rt /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0/alp
rt ha-dec_osf /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0
rt /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/site_perl/5.6.0
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:40:15
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Currently using ...
rt
rtCompaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.3
rton a AlphaServer 1200 5/533 4MB running OpenVMS V7.3-1
rtCompaq C V6.5-001 on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:55:26
+0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt * Wed Sep 25 2002 Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt - Don't do an explicit make build-shared, it's not needed and could only
rt cause harm (link libssl against libcrypto
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:54:31 +0300,
Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solar I've now tried removing the patch from our 0.9.6g package and what I
solar get is:
solar
solar 1. Both versions appear to produce a working library now, however:
solar
solar 2. The
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:26:26
+0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Well, I left it in because the original Makefile would build it too.
rt Is that just to support Configure rsaref?
Yes.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:33:29
+0100 (MET), Michael Bell via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Thanks a lot. It looks great. One question - I checked
rt crypto/objects/objects.txt and see that the OIDs for Microsoft's
rt smartcardlogin are still not present. Can
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:57:10
+0100 (MET), Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt What about trying to do the following before running nmake:
rt
rt C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .Net\VC7\bin\VCVARS32
rt
rt If this doesn't work
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:24:16
+0100 (MET), Ernst G Giessmann via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Run in your doc/apps directory
rt
rt fgrep =head1 NAME *.pod
rt
rt you'll get
rt
rt CA.pl.pod:=head1 NAME
rt asn1parse.pod:=head1 NAME
rt ...more files
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:54:21
+0100 (MET), Jack Lloyd via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Looks like the 1.1 TLS draft spec uses the same wording. Perhaps someone
rt should contact the TLS WG and ask for a clarification on this issue? [I'll
rt do it if nobody else is
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
