On 08/07/15 18:12, Steve Baker wrote:
On 09/07/15 04:39, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 08/07/15 09:03, Sean Dague wrote:
Personally, I'm running out of steam on tags for this cycle, but Zane
brought up a good point in the TC meeting yesterday, which was that it
would be nice to have tags for criteria
On 26/06/15 15:14, Hongbin Lu wrote:
Hi team,
I would like to start my question by using a sample template:
heat_template_version: 2014-10-16
parameters:
count:
type: number
default: 5
removal_list:
type: comma_delimited_list
default: []
resources:
Every day I get an email about broken dependencies for the group-based
policy Heat plugin in Fedora (openstack-heat-gbp), because the version
of Heat it depends on is capped. Two points:
1) Would whoever maintains that package (Bob?) please fix it :)
2) Why was this plugin not submitted to
This thread kind of deteriorated a bit (though it looks like it's
hopefully recovering), so I'd just like to add some observations.
What we have here is a classic case of a long-running fork, with all
that that entails. In this case the fork is a public one, but that
actually makes very
On 11/06/15 09:38, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
Yesterday we landed the infrastructure for Grenade external plugins -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185050/
The first user of this is the Heat project,
Ever since we established[1] a format for including metadata about bugs
in Git commit messages that included a 'Partial-Bug' tag, people have
been looking for a way to do the equivalent for partial blueprint
implementations. A non-exhaustive search of a small number of projects
reveals at
On 28/05/15 03:35, Jan Provaznik wrote:
On 05/28/2015 01:10 AM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 28/05/15 10:54, Richard Raseley wrote:
Zane Bitter wrote:
Steve is working on a patch to allow package-based updates of overcloud
nodes[1] using the distro's package manager (yum in the case of RDO
On 27/05/15 12:42, Clint Byrum wrote:
== Crazy idea section ==
One thing I never had a chance to discuss with any of the Zaqar devs that
I would find interesting is an email-only backend for Zaqar. Basically
make Zaqar an HTTP-to-email gateway. There are quite a few hyper-scale
options for
Steve is working on a patch to allow package-based updates of overcloud
nodes[1] using the distro's package manager (yum in the case of RDO, but
conceivable apt in others). Note we're talking exclusively about minor
updates, not version-to-version upgrades here.
Dan mentioned at the summit
multi-tenant capable and authenticated (if it's so safe why not use the
same RabbitMQ as all the other services?), but it would be less of an
'immediate uninstall' case.
cheers,
Zane.
Thanks,
Kevin *
*
*From:* Zane Bitter
On 22/05/15 11:48, Amrith Kumar wrote:
I’m posting this to the mailing list to summarize my notes from a
meeting at 5pm yesterday at Summit relative to Zaqar and lightweight
multi-tenant messaging and how it may be applicable to a number of projects.
I’ll begin by saying these are not ‘minutes’
On 14/05/15 23:38, Adam Young wrote:
So the mechanisms are there. In the short term we'd need some
cross-project co-operation to define a system through which we can do
this across projects (i.e. Murano or any other service can create a
user and have Zaqar authorise it for listening on a
On 15/05/15 11:57, Adam Young wrote:
It's kind of unfortunate IMHO that the default policy.json files tend
to give all users access to non-admin APIs, rather than requiring a
specific role (like Member).
Working on that. Come to my policy session!
This one, I assume:
On 14/05/15 10:39, Geoff Arnold wrote:
+1
There seems to be a significant disconnect between Heat, Horizon and
Keystone on the subject of multi-region configurations, and the
documentation isn’t helpful. At the very least, it would be useful if
discussions at the summit could result in a decent
offers support for dealing with multiple
regions within a single cloud. It also offers an option to switch
between multiple different clouds using an option unfortunately called
AVAILABLE_REGIONS, which is a total misnomer.
- ZB
Geoff
On May 14, 2015, at 7:56 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
is restricted to be authenticated to
specific API URL like GET /v1/queues/queue-id/
Thanks
Gosha
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov
mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
+1
From: Zane Bitter [zbit...@redhat.com
.
Sincerely yours,
Stan Lagun
Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis
mailto:sla...@mirantis.com
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com
mailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote:
Zane,
Fully agree with you vision here.
On 12 May 2015, at 07:15, Zane Bitter
On 11/05/15 05:49, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 08/05/15 00:45 -0700, Nikhil Manchanda wrote:
3) The trove-guest-agent is in vm. it is connected by taskmanager
by rabbitmq. We designed it. But is there some prectise to do this?
how to make the vm be connected in vm-network and
all of the many groups who need it so
that they can prioritise the work appropriately :)
cheers,
Zane.
Thanks
Gosha
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov
mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
+1
From: Zane Bitter
Hello!
This looks like a perfect soapbox from which to talk about my favourite
issue ;)
You're right about the ssh idea, for the reasons discussed related to
networking and a few more that weren't (e.g. users shouldn't have to and
generally don't want to give their private SSH keys to cloud
On 06/05/15 08:25, ICHIBA Sara wrote:
hey there,
Please I wanna know if their is anyway I can have cpu, ram and network
meters for each VM returned by ceilometer to heat for autoscaling tasks?
In advance, thank you for your response,
Sara
The openstack-dev list is for discussing future
On 06/05/15 09:13, Anne Gentle wrote:
Hi all,
In the interest of communicating sooner rather than later, I wanted to
write a new thread to say that Flavio Percoco and I are going to work on
a TC communications plan as co-chairs of a TC communications working group.
I think we can find a happy
On 28/04/15 03:56, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:41:52PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 27/04/15 13:38, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:46:20PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
AFAICT there's two options:
1. Update the stack.Stack so we store now at every transition
On 27/04/15 13:38, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:46:20PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
AFAICT there's two options:
1. Update the stack.Stack so we store now at every transition (e.g in
state_set)
2. Stop trying to explicitly control updated_at, and just allow the oslo
On 24/04/15 09:00, Ed Leafe wrote:
I'm not sure what you see as the difference between the end users and the
operators of OpenStack, because in my mind they are one and the same. I don't consider
the people using, say, public cloud services to be OpenStack end users, because ultimately they
On 24/04/15 07:21, Amrith Kumar wrote:
Julien,
We had a similar discussion within Trove several months ago and agreed to a
convention that if you have a question, that should not warrant a -1 unless, as
you indicate there's a strong reason to believe that the code is wrong and the
question
On 24/04/15 09:52, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/24/2015 08:30 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
I'm not sure what you see as the difference between the end
users and the operators of OpenStack, because in my mind they
are one and the same. I don't consider
On 24/04/15 20:00, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov
mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
Notification might be a good way to integrate with nova. Individual
tenants might want to do things as vm's come up/down, etc. Right
now, you need
On 24/04/15 19:02, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like my first action as Zaqar's PTL to be based on reflections and
transparency with regards to what our past has been, to what
On 23/04/15 12:14, Chris Dent wrote:
This might be a bit presumptuous, but why not give it a try...
Not at all, we should *strongly* encourage people to ask questions of
the candidates.
In fact, I think we should encourage everyone to contribute to the
discussion, not just the candidates.
Hello Stackists,
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee.
I'm running because I don't think that the diversity of perspectives
amongst TC members reflects the diversity of our community. We're
fortunate to have a few people whose brilliance often transcends the
On 17/04/15 10:11, VACHNIS, AVI (AVI) wrote:
Hi,
@Ashish, if the limitation you've mentioned for #1 still exists, I join
your question how heat auto-scale-group may work w/o ceilometer being
able to collect docker metrics?
Yeah, you're correct. Approach #2 has exactly the same problem as
On 17/04/15 13:54, Matt Fischer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 17/04/15 12:46, Matt Fischer wrote:
The wiki for Using Cloudwatch states:
This feature will be deprecated or removed during
On 16/04/15 04:05, Anant Patil wrote:
Hi,
Sometime back we had a discussion on IRC regarding sqlite migration
scripts. Since sqlite is mostly used for testing, we were thinking
about moving the sqlite migration related code to tests folder and
keep the migrate_repo sane (with only production
On 17/04/15 12:46, Matt Fischer wrote:
The wiki for Using Cloudwatch states:
This feature will be deprecated or removed during the Havana cycle as
we move to using Ceilometer as a metric/alarm service instead. [1]
However it seems that cloudwatch is still being developed.
It doesn't seem
On 08/04/15 21:51, Miguel Grinberg wrote:
Hi Angus,
Regarding this:
As Zane suggested, you should think of autoscaling as been in a
different service.
It's not that I can't see your point of view. I can imagine an
autoscaling service. I agree with you guys that if we had that, then
none of
On 06/04/15 22:55, Angus Salkeld wrote:
Hi all
For quite some time we (Heat team) have wanted to be able to send
messages to our
users (by user I do not mean the Operator, but the User that is
interacting with the client).
What do I mean by user messages, and how do they differ from our
On 07/04/15 22:02, Miguel Grinberg wrote:
Hi,
The OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup resource is somewhat limited at this
time, because when a scaling even occurs it does not notify dependent
resources, such as a load balancer, that the pool of instances has changed.
As Thomas mentioned, the
On 08/04/15 18:03, Miguel Grinberg wrote:
Here is where we disagree. In my opinion this is broken functionality.
It's not broken functionality, it's functionality that never existed.
Spontaneous stack updates are just not part of the CloudFormation model,
and they've never been a part of
On 07/04/15 05:13, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:31:39PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
A few of us have been looking for a way to perform software updates to
servers in a TripleO Heat/Puppet-based overcloud that avoids an impedance
mismatch with Heat concepts and how Heat runs its
On 03/04/15 01:29, Giulio Fidente wrote:
hi there,
thanks for sharing this, I have a
On 04/03/2015 12:31 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
A few of us have been looking for a way to perform software updates to
servers in a TripleO Heat/Puppet-based overcloud
[...]
Here's a trivial example of what
On 02/04/15 20:31, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
I'm not sure how to feel about this... Its clever...
That's... unfortunate ;)
Ideally this would sound like something that is a natural fit for Heat's
data model. The reason it's not is that config management tools like
Puppet are less sophisticated
A few of us have been looking for a way to perform software updates to
servers in a TripleO Heat/Puppet-based overcloud that avoids an
impedance mismatch with Heat concepts and how Heat runs its workflow. As
many talented TripleO-ers who have gone before can probably testify,
that's
On 26/03/15 15:30, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
I attached an example of the template which is hanging right now in my
Juno environment. I believe it hangs because of floating ip stuff and
the way how it is attached to a VM.
It is autogenerated, so please don't be disturbed by strange resource
On 30/03/15 03:51, BORTMAN, Limor (Limor) wrote:
Hi,
I noticed the we can't use network name under OS::Neutron::Port (only
network_id) as a valid neutron property, and I was wondering why?
IIRC it was something weird about how python-neutronclient worked at the
time.
I expected it to be
On 26/03/15 15:56, Matt Fischer wrote:
We don't have heat stack-abandon enabled. It's marked as a preview
feature, have you had any issues?
It's fairly safe for this use case. If it's important for you that you
don't lose track of your resources and you want to adopt them again
later, it's a
On 26/03/15 10:38, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
Hi all,
following IRC discussion here is a summary of what I propose can be done
in this regard, in the order of increased decoupling:
1) make a separate requirements.txt for integration tests and modify the
tox job to use it. The code of these
On 19/03/15 06:17, VACHNIS, AVI (AVI) wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at this interesting blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-lifecycle-plugpoint and I
hope you can easily clarify some things to me.
I see the following statements related to this BP:
* [in problem description
On 20/03/15 14:33, Rob Pothier (rpothier) wrote:
Hi All,
It was brought to my attention that the recent changes with the vnic_type
possibly should not include the colon in the property value.
In the earlier versions of the review the colon was not in the property,
and was appended later.
On 16/03/15 16:38, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:53 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote:
On 03/10/2015 05:53 PM, James Slagle wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Jan Provazník jprov...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
it would make sense to have a library for the code shared by Tuskar UI and
CLI (I mean
On 09/03/15 23:47, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com
mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Magnum Team,
In the following review, we have the start of a discussion about how
to tackle bay status:
On 10/03/15 12:26, Manickam, Kanagaraj wrote:
Hi,
I observed in one of the patch mentioned below, OS::Heat::ScaledResource
is reported as unknown, could anyone help here to resolve the issue. Thanks.
On 10/03/15 12:29, Russell Bryant wrote:
I feel that we're at a very vulnerable part of this transition. We've
abolished the incubation process and integrated release. We've
established a fairly low bar for new projects [2]. However, we have not
yet approved*any* tags other than the one
On 25/02/15 19:15, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 25/02/15 15:37, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch
mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch
On 25/02/15 15:37, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch
mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
A few inline comments and a general point
How do we handle scenarios like volumes when we have a per-component
janitor rather than a single co-ordinator
On 16/02/15 16:06, Dmitri Zimine wrote:
2) Use functions, like Heat HOT or TOSCA:
HOT templates and TOSCA doesn’t seem to have a concept of typed
variables to borrow from (please correct me if I missed it). But they
have functions: function: { function_name: {foo: [parameter1, parameter
2],
On 03/02/15 14:12, Clint Byrum wrote:
The visible change in making things parallel was minimal. In talking
about convergence, it's become clear that users can and should expect
something radically different when they issue stack updates. I'd love to
say that it can be done to just bind
On 05/02/15 12:23, James Denton wrote:
Hello all,
Regarding
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/router-properties-object
Does anyone know if there are plans to implement this functionality in
an upcoming release?
Unlikely - unfortunately the Neutron API for extra routes makes it
On 02/02/15 19:52, Steve Baker wrote:
A spec has been raised to add a config option to allow operators to
choose whether to use the new convergence engine for stack operations.
For some context you should read the spec first [1]
Rather than doing this, I would like to propose the following:
I
On 30/01/15 02:19, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 29/01/2015 17:47
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Keystone] Native keystone resources in
Heat
I got a question today about creating
On 26/01/15 19:04, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm also prepared to propose specs for all of these _if_ people
think that would be helpful. I see three options here:
- Propose 18 fairly
On 30/01/15 05:20, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:31:17PM -0500, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 29/01/15 12:03, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:41:36AM -0500, Zane Bitter wrote:
IIUC keystone now allows you to add users to a domain that is otherwise
backed by a read-only
I got a question today about creating keystone users/roles/tenants in
Heat templates. We currently support creating users via the
AWS::IAM::User resource, but we don't have a native equivalent.
IIUC keystone now allows you to add users to a domain that is otherwise
backed by a read-only
On 29/01/15 12:03, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:41:36AM -0500, Zane Bitter wrote:
IIUC keystone now allows you to add users to a domain that is otherwise
backed by a read-only backend (i.e. LDAP). If this means that it's now
possible to configure a cloud so that one need
On 27/01/15 20:36, Angus Salkeld wrote:
Hi all
After having a look at the stats:
http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/heat-group/90
http://stackalytics.com/?module=heat-groupmetric=person-day
I'd like to propose the following changes to the Heat core team:
Add:
Qiming Teng
Huang
On 25/01/15 00:03, Hongbin Lu wrote:
Hi Heat team,
I am looking for a solution to bridge between OpenStack and EC2.
According to documents, it seems that Heat has multicloud support but
the remote cloud(s) must be OpenStack.
It actually doesn't, although it is planned. (We have multi-region
On 25/01/15 10:41, Dmitry wrote:
Hello,
I need to receive instance id as part of the instance installation script.
Something like:
params:
$current_id: {get_param: $this.id http://this.id}
I have no idea what this is supposed to mean, sorry.
Is it possible?
The get_resource
I've mentioned this in passing a few times, but I want to lay it out
here in a bit more detail for comment. Basically we're implementing
convergence at a time when we still have a lot of 'unit' tests that are
really integration tests, and we don't want to have to rewrite them to
anticipate
Hi folks,
I'd like to come to agreement on the last major questions of the
convergence design. I well aware that I am the current bottleneck as I
have been struggling to find enough time to make progress on it, but I
think we are now actually very close.
I believe the last remaining issue to
On 13/01/15 11:58, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
I also had a chat with Steve Hardy and he suggested adding a STOPPED
state to the stack (this isn't in the spec). While not strictly
necessary to implement the spec, this would help people figure out that
the stack has reached a breakpoint instead of just
On 13/01/15 10:01, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-01-13 07:46:38 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote:
Why doesn't rally just remove itself from projects.txt, then there
would be no restrictions on what it adds.
I second this recommendation. If Rally wants to depend on things
which are not part of
On 12/01/15 10:49, Ryan Brown wrote:
On 01/12/2015 10:29 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hey folks,
I did a quick proof of concept for a part of the Stack Breakpoint
spec[1] and I put the does this resource have a breakpoint flag into
the metadata of the resource:
On 12/01/15 13:05, Steven Hardy wrote:
I also had a chat with Steve Hardy and he suggested adding a STOPPED state
to the stack (this isn't in the spec). While not strictly necessary to
implement the spec, this would help people figure out that the stack has
reached a breakpoint instead of just
On 08/01/15 05:39, Anant Patil wrote:
1. The stack was failing when there were single disjoint resources or
just one resource in template. The graph did not include this resource
due to a minor bug in dependency_names(). I have added a test case and
fix here:
On 09/01/15 01:07, Angus Salkeld wrote:
I am not in favor of the --continue as an API. I'd suggest responding to
resource timeouts and if there is no response from the task, then
re-start (continue)
the task.
Yeah, I am not in favour of a new API either. In fact, I believe we
already have
On 24/12/14 05:17, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 03:42:37PM -0500, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 22/12/14 13:21, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
So, lately I've been having various discussions around $subject, and I know
it's something several folks in our community are interested in, so I
The -dev mailing list is not for usage questions. Please post your
question to ask.openstack.org and include the text of the error message
you when trying to add a RouterInterface.
cheers,
Zane.
On 22/12/14 04:18, Rao Shweta wrote:
Hi All
I am working on openstack Heat and i wanted to
On 22/12/14 13:21, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
So, lately I've been having various discussions around $subject, and I know
it's something several folks in our community are interested in, so I
wanted to get some ideas I've been pondering out there for discussion.
I'll start with a proposal of
On 15/12/14 07:47, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
We have similar questions regarding other
areas in your implementation, which we believe if we understand the outline of
your implementation. It is difficult to get
a hold on your approach just by looking at code. Docs strings / Etherpad will
help.
On 17/12/14 13:05, Gurjar, Unmesh wrote:
I'm storing a tuple of its name and database ID. The data structure is
resource.GraphKey. I was originally using the name for something, but I
suspect I could probably drop it now and just store the database ID, but I
haven't tried it yet. (Having the
On 15/12/14 09:32, Anant Patil wrote:
On 12-Dec-14 06:29, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 11/12/14 01:14, Anant Patil wrote:
On 04-Dec-14 10:49, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote:
On GitHub:https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc
I'm trying to review this code
, that goes without saying. In my implementation
Stack._create_or_update() handles all three operations.
It would be great if we can freeze a stable approach by mid-week as Christmas
vacations are round the corner. :) :)
-Original Message-
From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com]
Sent
On 15/12/14 10:15, Anant Patil wrote:
On 13-Dec-14 05:42, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 12/12/14 05:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:37 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re
On 12/12/14 05:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:37 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept
showdown
On 11/12/14 08:26
On 11/12/14 01:14, Anant Patil wrote:
On 04-Dec-14 10:49, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote:
On GitHub:https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc
I'm trying to review this code at the moment, and finding some stuff I
don't understand:
https://github.com
On 11/12/14 08:26, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
[Murugan, Visnusaran]
In case of rollback where we have to cleanup earlier version of resources,
we could get the order from old template. We'd prefer not to have a graph
table.
In theory you could get it by keeping old templates around. But that
You really need to get a real email client with quoting support ;)
On 10/12/14 06:42, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Well, we still have to persist the dependencies of each version of a resource
_somehow_, because otherwise we can't know how to clean them up in the correct
order. But what I think
On 09/12/14 03:48, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
Hey,
I think it’s a question of what the final goal is. For just creating security
groups as a resource I think Georgy and Zane are right, just use Heat. If the
goal is to try Mistral or have this simple workflow as part of more complex
then it’s
On 08/12/14 09:41, Sushma Korati wrote:
Can we create multiple resources using a single task, like multiple
keypairs or security-groups or networks etc?
Define them in a Heat template and create the Heat stack as a single task.
- ZB
___
On 08/12/14 07:00, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi Zane Michael,
Please have a look @
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/execution-stream-and-aggregator-based-convergence
Updated with a combined approach which does not require persisting graph and
backup stack removal.
Well, we still have to
On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote:
On GitHub:https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc
I'm trying to review this code at the moment, and finding some stuff I
don't understand:
https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc/blob/master/heat/engine/stack.py#L911-L916
This
On 01/12/14 18:34, Angus Salkeld wrote:
I'd suggest a combination between A and B.
We may not be as far apart as I thought.
1) Separate some of the autoscaling logic into libraries in Heat
2) Get the separated REST service in place and working (using the above
heat library)
3) Add an
On 13/11/14 13:59, Clint Byrum wrote:
I'm not sure we have the same understanding of AMQP, so hopefully we can
clarify here. This stackoverflow answer echoes my understanding:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17841843/rabbitmq-does-one-consumer-block-the-other-consumers-of-the-same-queue
Not
On 26/11/14 09:13, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
Thanks Pavlo.
Is there any reason why FIFO was chosen?
I believe that this was the original termination policy on AWS, and that
was the reason we chose it. It was used on AWS because if you deleted an
instance that was just created you would be
On 26/11/14 09:33, Louis Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 08:54:35AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
It's not about an equality condition.
It's about the message that is produced by testtools.TestCase.assertEqual(),
and the helpfulness of that message when the order of the arguments is
reversed.
On 26/11/14 05:20, Pradip Mukhopadhyay wrote:
Hello,
Any pointer (document and/or code pointer) related to how the different
overridden methods are getting called when a custom resource is getting
deployed in the heat stack?
Basically just tried to annotate the h-eng log on a simple,
A bunch of us have spent the last few weeks working independently on
proof of concept designs for the convergence architecture. I think those
efforts have now reached a sufficient level of maturity that we should
start working together on synthesising them into a plan that everyone
can forge
On 13/11/14 06:52, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Murugan, Visnusaran
visnusaran.muru...@hp.com mailto:visnusaran.muru...@hp.com wrote:
Hi all,
__ __
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource
actions over RPC for any
On 13/11/14 03:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi all,
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource actions
over RPC for any heat-engine to execute. Entire stack lifecycle will be
controlled by worker/observer notifications. This distributed model has
its own advantages and
On 13/11/14 09:31, Jastrzebski, Michal wrote:
Guys, I don't think we want to get into this cluster management mud. You say
let's
make observer...and what if observer dies? Do we do observer to observer? And
then
there is split brain. I'm observer, I've lost connection to worker. Should I
401 - 500 of 779 matches
Mail list logo
