Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Oslo] Federation and Policy

2014-09-23 Thread David Chadwick
Hi Doug thanks. We will test this next week regards David On 19/09/2014 18:43, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 6:56 AM, David Chadwick wrote: > >> >> >> On 18/09/2014 22:14, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 18, 2014, at 4:34 PM, David Chadwick >>> wrote: >>> O

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-23 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > On Sep 22, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Devananda van der Veen > wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 22, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Devananda van der Veen >>> wrote: >>> One of the primary effects of integ

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Stepping down as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread Henry Nash
Agree with all the comments made - Dolph, you really did a great job as PTL - keeping the balanced view is a crucial part of the role. Keystone is the better for it. Henry On 23 Sep 2014, at 17:08, Yee, Guang wrote: > ++ Amen, brother! > > From: Lance Bragstad [mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com]

Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Kilo release cycle schedule proposal

2014-09-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:42:30AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 09/23/2014 02:56 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Rather than waste a design summit session about it, I propose we review >>> the proposed Kilo release cy

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Not seeking another term as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 23 September 2014 15:57, John Griffith wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > I've been kinda mixed on this one, but I think it's a good time for me to > not run for Cinder PTL. I've been filling the role since we started the > idea back at the Folsom Summit, and it's been an absolute pleasure and honor >

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 22 September 2014 23:14, Robert Collins wrote: > I am not at all sure we've prevented other flowers blooming - > and I hate the idea that we have done that. I've certainly sat around at discussions which shut down hard with somebody making the statement that 'that is TripleO's field and they d

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-23 Thread Zane Bitter
On 22/09/14 22:04, Joe Gordon wrote: To me this is less about valid or invalid choices. The Zaqar team is comparing Zaqar to SQS, but after digging into the two of them, zaqar barely looks like SQS. Zaqar doesn't guarantee what IMHO is the most important parts of SQS: the message will be delivere

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Stepping down as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread Yee, Guang
++ Amen, brother! From: Lance Bragstad [mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:52 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Stepping down as PTL On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrot

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation

2014-09-23 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/22/2014 05:29 AM, Kenichi Oomichi wrote: -Original Message- From: Alex Xu [mailto:x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 3:40 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation Close to Kilo, it i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation

2014-09-23 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/22/2014 04:27 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Alex Xu mailto:x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: Close to Kilo, it is time to think about what's next for nova API. In Kilo, we will continue develop the important feature micro-version. In previous v2

[openstack-dev] [Murano] weekly meeting cancelled

2014-09-23 Thread Ruslan Kamaldinov
Since there are no major updates and some folks will not be able to join Murano weekly meeting, we've decided to skip it for today. Short update: 1. The only remaining major item left for juno is documentation and everyone is pretty aware about items we need to have in our docs: https://etherpad.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Kilo release cycle schedule proposal

2014-09-23 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-09-23 15:26:20 + (+), Amir Sadoughi wrote: > Instead of moving the Kilo cycle a week later (April 23 -> April > 30), would it be possible to move the "L" design summit a week > ahead (May 18-22 -> May 11-15). This would extend the L-cycle a > week. Additionally, this would also help

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sep 22, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >> On Sep 22, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Devananda van der Veen >> wrote: >> >>> One of the primary effects of integration, as far as the release >>> process is concerned, is being

Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Kilo release cycle schedule proposal

2014-09-23 Thread Amir Sadoughi
Instead of moving the Kilo cycle a week later (April 23 -> April 30), would it be possible to move the "L" design summit a week ahead (May 18-22 -> May 11-15). This would extend the L-cycle a week. Additionally, this would also help with return travel as the following Monday is Memorial Day; I'd

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sep 23, 2014, at 5:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Devananda van der Veen wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> On Sep 22, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Devananda van der Veen >>> wrote: >>> One of the primary effects of integration, as far as the release proces

Re: [openstack-dev] Could we please use 1.4.1 for oslo.messaging *now*? (was: Oslo final releases ready)

2014-09-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sep 23, 2014, at 4:35 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 09/18/2014 10:04 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> All of the final releases for the Oslo libraries for the Juno cycle are >> available on PyPI. I’m working on a couple of patches to the global >> requirements list to update the baseline in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-23 Thread Zane Bitter
On 23/09/14 08:58, Flavio Percoco wrote: I believe the guarantee is still useful and it currently does not represent an issue for the service nor the user. 2 things could happen to FIFO in the future: 1. It's made optional and we allow users to opt-in in a per flavor basis. (I personally don't l

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Not seeking another term as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I've been kinda mixed on this one, but I think it's a good time for me to not run for Cinder PTL. I've been filling the role since we started the idea back at the Folsom Summit, and it's been an absolute pleasure and honor for me. I don't plan on going anywhere and will still be in

Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Kilo release cycle schedule proposal

2014-09-23 Thread Thierry Carrez
Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/23/2014 02:56 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Rather than waste a design summit session about it, I propose we review >> the proposed Kilo release cycle schedule on the mailing-list. See >> attached PDF for a picture of the proposal. >> >> The hard date the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Stepping down as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread Lance Bragstad
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Adam Young wrote: > > OpenStack owes you more than most people realize. > > +1 > > Dolph did a great job of keeping the fundamental piece that is Keystone > safe from a release management perspective, by consistently hitting all > the deadl

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
confirmed On 23/09/14 10:19 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > This is an announcement of my standing for PTL of the Cinder project. > > I've been an active member of the Cinder core team from day one, and > I've had the pleasure of working closely with John Griffith, the > incumbent PTL, and a large and

[openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
This is an announcement of my standing for PTL of the Cinder project. I've been an active member of the Cinder core team from day one, and I've had the pleasure of working closely with John Griffith, the incumbent PTL, and a large and varied collection of contributors for that period. My job is r

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL Non-Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Brian Rosmaita
I am really sorry to see you step down, but congratulations! cheers, brian From: Mark Washenberger [mark.washenber...@markwash.net] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 12:22 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL Non-Candidacy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Designate] DNS Services PTL Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/23/2014 05:11 AM, Mac Innes, Kiall wrote: Hi all, I'd like to announce my candidacy for the DNS Services Program PTL position. I’ve been involved in Designate since day one, as the both original author and as pseudo-PTL pre-incubation. Designate and the DNS Services program have come

Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Kilo release cycle schedule proposal

2014-09-23 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-09-23 12:53:42 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > I didn't really notice anyone stop working in the last off-week we > had. Changes kept being submitted at normal rate, people kept talking > on IRC, etc, etc. An off-week is a nice idea in theory but it didn't > seem to have much eff

Re: [openstack-dev] [Designate] DNS Services PTL Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
confirmed On 23/09/14 07:11 AM, Mac Innes, Kiall wrote: > Hi all, > > > I'd like to announce my candidacy for the DNS Services Program PTL position. > > > I've been involved in Designate since day one, as the both original author > and as pseudo-PTL pre-incubation. Designate and the DNS Servi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence: Backing up template instead of stack

2014-09-23 Thread Anant Patil
On 23-Sep-14 09:42, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2014-09-22 20:15:43 -0700: >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Anant Patil wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> One of the steps in the direction of convergence is to enable Heat >>> engine to handle concurrent stack operations

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTL Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
confirmed On 23/09/14 12:58 AM, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello all, > > My name is Mike Perez, and I would like to be your next PTL for the OpenStack > block storage project Cinder. > > I've been involved with the OpenStack community since October 2010. I'm > a senior developer for Datera, which cont

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] PTL Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
confirmed On 23/09/14 05:10 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > Folks, > > I'd like to continue serving as Telemetry PTL for a second cycle. > > When I took on the role for Juno, I saw some challenges facing the > project that would take multi-cycle efforts to resolve, so I'd like to > have the opportu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - what integration with Keystone is allowed?

2014-09-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 22 September 2014 21:49, Mark McClain wrote: > Ideally, I think something that provides proper sync support should exist in > Keystone or a Keystone related project vs multiple implementations in > Neutron, Cinder or any other multi-tenant service that wants to provide more > human friendly na

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-23 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 09/23/2014 10:58 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 09/22/2014 05:58 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: >> On 22/09/14 10:11, Gordon Sim wrote: >>> As I understand it, pools don't help scaling a given queue since all the >>> messages for that queue must be in the same pool. At present traffic >>> through different

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation

2014-09-23 Thread Alex Xu
On 2014年09月23日 17:12, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:29:26 + Kenichi Oomichi wrote: Before discussing how to implement, I'd like to consider what we should implement. IIUC, the purpose of v3 API is to make consistent API with the backwards incompatible changes. Through huge

[openstack-dev] [Neutron]Dynamically load service provider

2014-09-23 Thread Germy Lure
Hi stackers, I have an idea about service provider framework. Anyone interested in this topic can give me some suggestions. My idea is that providers report their services capability dynamically not configured in neutron.conf. See details by the link below. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/

Re: [openstack-dev] Oslo messaging vs zaqar

2014-09-23 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
On 23/09/2014 12:58 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: > > Excerpts from Geoff O'Callaghan's message of 2014-09-22 17:30:47 -0700: > > On 23/09/2014 1:59 AM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: > > > > > > Geoff, do you expect all of our users to write all of their messaging > > > code in Python? > > > > > > oslo.messagi

Re: [openstack-dev] Could we please use 1.4.1 for oslo.messaging *now*? (was: Oslo final releases ready)

2014-09-23 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Zigo, Ouch! Can you please open a bug in oslo.messaging, i'll mark it critical thanks, dims On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 09/18/2014 10:04 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> All of the final releases for the Oslo libraries for the Juno cycle are >> available on PyPI. I’m

Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Kilo release cycle schedule proposal

2014-09-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:42:30AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/23/2014 02:56 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Rather than waste a design summit session about it, I propose we review > > the proposed Kilo release cycle schedule on the mailing-list. See > > attached PDF for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Kilo release cycle schedule proposal

2014-09-23 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/23/2014 02:56 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Rather than waste a design summit session about it, I propose we review > the proposed Kilo release cycle schedule on the mailing-list. See > attached PDF for a picture of the proposal. > > The hard date the proposal is built around

[openstack-dev] [Designate] DNS Services PTL Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Mac Innes, Kiall
Hi all, I'd like to announce my candidacy for the DNS Services Program PTL position. I've been involved in Designate since day one, as the both original author and as pseudo-PTL pre-incubation. Designate and the DNS Services program have come a long way since the project was first introduced

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL Non-Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread stuart . mclaren
Hi Mark, Many thanks for your leadership, and keeping glance so enjoyable to work on over the last few cycles. -Stuart From: Mark Washenberger To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL Non-Candidacy Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" G

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Deprecating localfs?

2014-09-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:27:52PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Michael Still wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > I know we've been talking about deprecating nova.virt.disk.vfs.localfs > > for a long time, in favour of wanting people to use libguestfs > > instead. However, I can't immediately find an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] REST API style guide (Re: [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation)

2014-09-23 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:00:26 +0900 "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" wrote: \> > So how about just using HTTP 200(OK) only for status codes? > That would give up providing accurate internal status to clients but > backwards backwards incompatibilities never happen. > No I think that we should where possible re

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation

2014-09-23 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:27:47 -0500 Brant Knudson wrote: > > > > > Did you consider JSON Home[1] for this? For Juno we've got JSON Home > support in Keystone for Identity v3 (Zaqar was using it already). We > weren't planning to use it for microversioning since we weren't > planning on doing micro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation

2014-09-23 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:47:50 -0500 Anne Gentle wrote: > > > > (1) Input/Output attribute names > > (1.1) These names should be snake_case. > > eg: imageRef -> image_ref, flavorRef -> flavor_ref, hostId -> > > host_id (1.2) These names should contain extension names if they > > are provided in ca

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][horizon] Dependency freeze exceptions: django-openstack-auth

2014-09-23 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Sorry for the delay. django-openstack-auth 1.1.7 was released last Friday and it seems David forgot to update global requirements. Now let me clarify how to handle this kind of bugs which requires a fix in a library after the release. What is the appropriate way to fix a bug depending on libraries

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Deprecating localfs?

2014-09-23 Thread Roman Bogorodskiy
Michael Still wrote: > Hi. > > I know we've been talking about deprecating nova.virt.disk.vfs.localfs > for a long time, in favour of wanting people to use libguestfs > instead. However, I can't immediately find any written documentation > for when we said we'd do that thing. > > Additionally,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Deprecating localfs?

2014-09-23 Thread Michael Still
I am ok with a staged approach, although I do think its something we should start in Kilo. That said though, we emit a warning if the installation doesn't have a working libguestfs in juno. Michael On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:53:36AM +1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Request for python-heatclient project to adopt heat-translator

2014-09-23 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message on 23/09/2014 11:37:42: > > > > On the other hand, there is a big downside to having it (only) in Heat also > > - you're dependent on the operator deciding to provide it. > > > > >- You prempt the decision about integration with any higher levelservices, > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Deprecating localfs?

2014-09-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:53:36AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: > Hi. > > I know we've been talking about deprecating nova.virt.disk.vfs.localfs > for a long time, in favour of wanting people to use libguestfs > instead. However, I can't immediately find any written documentation > for when we said

[openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar's path cleared out

2014-09-23 Thread Flavio Percoco
Greetings, I recently published a post[0] about Zaqar's path going forward with the hope to clarify a bit the project's vision and guarantees as a service - I didn't mention API features. Since we've been talking about this lately, I thought to share the post here to ease the discussion and to ki

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] No one replying on tempest issue?Please share your experience

2014-09-23 Thread Denis Makogon
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Nikesh Kumar Mahalka < nikeshmaha...@vedams.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am able to do all volume operations through dashboard and cli commands. > But when i am running tempest tests,some tests are getting failed. > For contributing cinder volume driver for my client in

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][horizon] Dependency freeze exceptions: django-openstack-auth

2014-09-23 Thread Thierry Carrez
Akihiro Motoki wrote: > I would like to request dependency freeze exceptions for > django-openstack-auth. > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123101/ This arguably counts as an internal library. We are freezing those now (well, last Friday was the deadline), so +1 on this one. -- Thierry Carrez

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-23 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 09/23/2014 05:13 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2014-09-22 19:04:03 -0700: [snip] >> >> To me this is less about valid or invalid choices. The Zaqar team is >> comparing Zaqar to SQS, but after digging into the two of them, zaqar >> barely looks like SQS. Zaqar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] No one replying on tempest issue?Please share your experience

2014-09-23 Thread Nikesh Kumar Mahalka
Hi, I am able to do all volume operations through dashboard and cli commands. But when i am running tempest tests,some tests are getting failed. For contributing cinder volume driver for my client in cinder,do all tempest tests should passed? Ex: 1) ./run_tempest.sh tempest.api.volume.test_volumes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Request for python-heatclient project to adopt heat-translator

2014-09-23 Thread Steven Hardy
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 06:54:27PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 09/09/14 05:52, Steven Hardy wrote: > >Hi Sahdev, > > > >On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:52:30AM -0400, Sahdev P Zala wrote: > >>Hello guys, > >> > >>As you know, the heat-translator project was started early this year > >> with

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-23 Thread Thierry Carrez
Robert Collins wrote: > On 19 September 2014 22:29, Thierry Carrez wrote: > ... >> current Heat team is not really interested in maintaining them. What's >> the point of being under the same program then ? And TripleO is not the >> only way to deploy OpenStack, but its mere existence (and name) >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-23 Thread Thierry Carrez
Devananda van der Veen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> On Sep 22, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Devananda van der Veen >> wrote: >> >>> One of the primary effects of integration, as far as the release >>> process is concerned, is being allowed to co-gate with other >>> inte

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation

2014-09-23 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:29:26 + Kenichi Oomichi wrote: > > Before discussing how to implement, I'd like to consider what we > should implement. IIUC, the purpose of v3 API is to make consistent > API with the backwards incompatible changes. Through huge discussion > in Juno cycle, we knew that

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] PTL Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Folks, I'd like to continue serving as Telemetry PTL for a second cycle. When I took on the role for Juno, I saw some challenges facing the project that would take multi-cycle efforts to resolve, so I'd like to have the opportunity to see that move closer to completion. Over Juno, our focus as

[openstack-dev] [requirements][horizon] Dependency freeze exceptions: django-openstack-auth

2014-09-23 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi, I would like to request dependency freeze exceptions for django-openstack-auth. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123101/ django-openstack-auth is developped along with Horizon and the recent release 1.1.7 of django-openstack-auth has good fixes which affect Juno Horizon, especially from the f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-23 Thread Gordon Sim
On 09/22/2014 05:58 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 22/09/14 10:11, Gordon Sim wrote: As I understand it, pools don't help scaling a given queue since all the messages for that queue must be in the same pool. At present traffic through different Zaqar queues are essentially entirely orthogonal streams

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Deprecating localfs?

2014-09-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:53:36AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: > Hi. > > I know we've been talking about deprecating nova.virt.disk.vfs.localfs > for a long time, in favour of wanting people to use libguestfs > instead. However, I can't immediately find any written documentation > for when we said

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Stepping down as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread Thierry Carrez
Adam Young wrote: > OpenStack owes you more than most people realize. +1 Dolph did a great job of keeping the fundamental piece that is Keystone safe from a release management perspective, by consistently hitting all the deadlines, giving time for other projects to safely build on it. > Don't yo

Re: [openstack-dev] Could we please use 1.4.1 for oslo.messaging *now*? (was: Oslo final releases ready)

2014-09-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 09/18/2014 10:04 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > All of the final releases for the Oslo libraries for the Juno cycle are > available on PyPI. I’m working on a couple of patches to the global > requirements list to update the baseline in the applications. In all cases, > the final release is a seco

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] libvirt boot parameters

2014-09-23 Thread Angelo Matarazzo
Hi, I think that this variable is useful for me cfg.IntOpt("reboot_timeout", default=0, help="Automatically hard reboot an instance if it has been " "stuck in a rebooting state longer than N seconds. " "Set to 0 to disable."), cfg.Int

<    1   2