On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:41:49AM +1100, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and
haven’t kept
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:37 AM, henry hly henry4...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
[..]
The problem is that we effectively prevent running an out of tree Neutron
driver (which *is* perfectly legitimate) if it uses a VIF plugging
Hello, Russell,
Many thanks for your reply. See inline comments.
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 5:22 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [PTL] Cascading vs. Cells – summit
Hi,Fox Kevin M
Thanks for your help.
Also,I want to know whether these features will be implemented in Ironic?
Do we have a plan to implement them?
Thanks
Xianchaobo
From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 5:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
Hi!
I recommend you to create separate user and password in Rabbit MQ and do
not use 'quest' user.
Don't forget to edit config file.
I recommend you to go to our IRC channel #murano Freenode. We will help you
to set up your environment step by step!
Regards,
Kate.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:12
On Wed, Dec 10 2014, Joshua Harlow wrote:
[…]
Or in general any other comments/ideas about providing such a deprecation
pattern library?
+1
* debtcollector
made me think of loanshark :)
--
Julien Danjou
-- Free Software hacker
-- http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 09:37:31AM +0800, henry hly wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
On 10 December 2014 at 01:31, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
So the problem of Nova review bandwidth is a constant problem across all
Hey guys sorry for the delayed reply. The problem was with the whitelist. I
had whitelisted the id of the physical function instead of the virtual
function.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:33 AM, shihanzhang ayshihanzh...@126.com wrote:
I think the problem is in nova, can you show your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
+100. I vote -1 there and would like to point out that we *must* keep
history during the split, and split from u/s code base, not random
repositories. If you don't know how to achieve this, ask oslo people,
they did it plenty of times when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/12/14 22:12, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-12-10 16:07:35 -0500 (-0500), Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/10/2014 04:05 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
I think the bigger question is whether the lack of a quota
implementation for everything a tenant
Hi Yamamoto,
XenAPI and Neutron do work well together, and we have an private CI that is
running Neutron jobs. As it's not currently the public CI it's harder to
access logs.
We're working on trying to move the existing XenServer CI from a nova-network
base to a neutron base, at which point
On 12/11/14, 12:50 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
+100. I vote -1 there and would like to point out that we *must* keep
history during the split, and split from u/s code base, not random
repositories. If you don't know how to
On 12/10/2014 10:34 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:43 PM, George Shuklin wrote:
I have some small discussion in launchpad: is lack of a quota for
unprivileged user counted as security bug (or at least as a bug)?
If user can create 100500 objects in database via normal API and ops
have
Hello everyone!
In neutron there is a rather old bug [1] about adding uniqueness for
security group name and tenant id. I found this idea reasonable and started
working on fix for this bug [2]. I think it is good to add a
uniqueconstraint because:
1) In nova there is such constraint for security
Kyle Mestery wrote:
Folks, just a heads up that we have completed splitting out the services
(FWaaS, LBaaS, and VPNaaS) into separate repositores. [1] [2] [3]. This
was all done in accordance with the spec approved here [4]. Thanks to
all involved, but a special thanks to Doug and Anita, as
George Shuklin wrote:
On 12/10/2014 10:34 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:43 PM, George Shuklin wrote:
I have some small discussion in launchpad: is lack of a quota for
unprivileged user counted as security bug (or at least as a bug)?
If user can create 100500 objects in database
-Original Message-
From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:17 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept
showdown
You really need to get a real email client with quoting
On 11/12/2014 13:16, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
George Shuklin wrote:
On 12/10/2014 10:34 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:43 PM, George Shuklin wrote:
I have some small discussion in launchpad: is lack of a quota for
unprivileged user counted as security bug (or at
On 12/11/2014 07:22 AM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
Hello everyone!
In neutron there is a rather old bug [1] about adding uniqueness for
security group name and tenant id. I found this idea reasonable and
started working on fix for this bug [2]. I think it is good to add a
uniqueconstraint
Good day Stackers.
I’d like to raise question about implementing custom pipelines for Zuul.
For those of you how’s pretty familiar with project-config and infra
itself it wouldn’t be a news that for now Zuul layout supports only few
pipelines types [1]
I would hope yes to all, but there is a lot of hard work there. Some things
there require neutron to configure physical switches. Some require a guest
agent in the image to get cinder working, or cinder controlled hardware. And
all require developers interested enough in making it happen.
No
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 03:39:35PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:33:47PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote:
Hello!
There is a feature in HypervisorSupportMatrix
(https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix) called Get Guest
Info. Does anybody
Hi all!
As you know I actively promote ironic-discoverd project [1] as one of
the means to do hardware inspection for Ironic (see e.g. spec [2]), so I
decided it's worth to give some updates to the community from time to
time. This email is purely informative, you may safely skip it, if
*Client just needs to know which URL to hit in order to invoke a certain
API, and does not need to know the procedure name or parameters ordering.*
That's where the difference is. I think the client has to know the
procedure name and parameters. Otherwise we have a translation factory
On Dec 11, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm generally in favor of making name attributes opaque, utf-8 strings that
are entirely user-defined and have no constraints on them. I consider the
name to be just a tag that the user places on some resource. It is the
Surprisingly deprecator is still available on pypi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10 2014, Joshua Harlow wrote:
[…]
Or in general any other comments/ideas about providing such a deprecation
pattern library?
+1
* debtcollector
made
Hi.
Why we filter out some fields from keeper object in create and list
operations?
in module nova.api.openstack.compute.plugins.v3.keypairs
class KeypairController(wsgi.Controller):
# ...
def _filter_keypair(self, keypair, **attrs):
clean = {
'name': keypair.name,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 09:37:31AM +0800, henry hly wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
On 10 December 2014 at 01:31, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 04:15:00PM +0100, Maxime Leroy wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 09:37:31AM +0800, henry hly wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
On 10 December
Hi,
I am trying to configure Barbican with an external HSM that has a PKCS#11
provider and just wondering if someone can point me in the right direction
on how to configure this type of environment?
Regards,
Ivan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
wrote:
The Neutron mid-cycle [1] is now complete, I wanted to let everyone know
how
it went. Thanks to all who attended, we got a lot done. I admit to
On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and
haven’t kept up with the review
On Dec 11, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com
mailto:mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
This all sounds like good work. Did you manage to progress the
nova-network to neutron migration tasks as well?
I
In today's early Nova meeting (UTC 1400), we realized that there no
longer is a conflicting meeting in #openstack-meeting.
I've adjusted the location here -
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Nova_team_Meeting
Also added a formula based on date +%U to let you figure out if it's
an early or
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014, Mark McClain m...@mcclain.xyz wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm generally in favor of making name attributes opaque, utf-8 strings that
are entirely user-defined and have no constraints on them. I
Perhaps this is a historical question, but I was wondering how the
default OpenStack flavor size ratio of 2/1 was determined? According to
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/, ec2 defines the flavors for
General Purpose (M3) at about 3.7/1, with Compute Intensive (C3) at
about 1.9/1 and
Also I’m just wondering how do we keep upstream modules in our repo? They
are not submodules, so how is it organized?
Currently, we don't have any automatic tracking system for changes we apply
to the community/upstream modules, that could help us to re-apply them
during the sync. Only git or
Which HSM do you have?
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 07:24 -0800, Ivan Wallis wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to configure Barbican with an external HSM that has a
PKCS#11 provider and just wondering if someone can point me in the
right direction on how to configure this type of environment?
Regards,
On 12/11/2014 09:36 AM, Jon Bernard wrote:
Heya, quick Ceph CI status update. Once the test_volume_boot_pattern
was marked as skipped, only the revert_resize test was failing. I have
submitted a patch to nova for this [1], and that yields an all green
ceph ci run [2]. So at the moment, and
On 12/11/2014 09:36 AM, Jon Bernard wrote:
Heya, quick Ceph CI status update. Once the test_volume_boot_pattern
was marked as skipped, only the revert_resize test was failing. I have
submitted a patch to nova for this [1], and that yields an all green
ceph ci run [2]. So at the moment, and
Please submit the blueprint and set the target for the milestone you are
targeting. That will add it the the blueprint review process for Horizon.
Seems like a minor change, so at this time, I don't foresee any issues with
approving it.
David
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Xin, Xiaohui
I'm probably not understanding the nuance of the question but moving the
_scripts.html file to openstack_dashboard creates some circular
dependencies, does it not? templates/base.html in the horizon side of the
repo includes _scripts.html and insures that the javascript needed by the
existing
We are looking for ten individuals to participate in a usability study
sponsored by the Horizon team. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the
proposed Launch Instance workflow. The study will be moderated remotely via
Google Hangouts.
Participant description: individuals who use cloud
On 12/11/2014 04:02 AM, joehuang wrote:
[joehuang] The major challenge for VDF use case is cross OpenStack
networking for tenants. The tenant's VM/Volume may be allocated in
different data centers geographically, but virtual network
(L2/L3/FW/VPN/LB) should be built for each tenant automatically
This is a notification that at the start of next week, all projects under the
Identity Program are going to see a cleanup of old/lingering open reviews. I
will be reviewing all reviews. If there is a negative score (this would be, -1
or -2 from jenkins, -1 or -2 from a code reviewer, or -1
We also spent a half day progressing the Ipam work and made a plan to move
forward.
Carl
On Dec 10, 2014 4:16 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
The Neutron mid-cycle [1] is now complete, I wanted to let everyone know
how it went. Thanks to all who attended, we got a lot done. I admit
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-12-11-17.59.html
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-12-11-17.59.log.html
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Sahara team
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
had a lot of
Renat,
Here's the blueprint.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-runtime-context
I'm proposing to add *args and **kwargs to the __init__ methods of all
actions. The action context can be passed as a dict in the kwargs. The
global context and the env context can be provided
On 12/11/2014 04:02 AM, joehuang wrote:
Hello, Russell,
Many thanks for your reply. See inline comments.
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 5:22 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
The dashboard is really cool, although I had to fix the spelling error...
Michael
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
It would not create a circular dependency, dashboard would depend on horizon - not the latter.Scripts that are library specific will live in horizon while scripts that are panel specific will live in dashboard.Let me draw a more concrete example.In Horizon We know that _script and _conf are
On Dec 11, 2014, at 2:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 09:37:31AM +0800, henry hly wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
On 10 December 2014 at 01:31, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
So
On Dec 11, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014, Mark McClain m...@mcclain.xyz wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm generally in favor of making name attributes opaque, utf-8 strings
Probably just a historical artifact of values that we thought were reasonable
for our machines at NASA.
Vish
On Dec 11, 2014, at 8:35 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
Perhaps this is a historical question, but I was wondering how the default
OpenStack flavor size ratio of 2/1 was
Ya,
I to was surprised by the general lack of this kind of library on pypi.
One would think u know that people deprecate stuff, but maybe this isn't
the norm for python... Why deprecate when u can just make v2.0 ;)
-Josh
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Surprisingly deprecator is still available on
On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/11/2014 04:01 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014, Mark McClain m...@mcclain.xyz wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Jay Pipes
On 12/11/2014 04:07 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/11/2014 04:01 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014, Mark McClain m...@mcclain.xyz wrote:
On 12/11/2014 04:16 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/11/2014 04:07 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/11/2014 04:01 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11,
On 2014-12-11 8:43 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
I'm generally in favor of making name attributes opaque, utf-8 strings
that are entirely user-defined and have no constraints on them. I
consider the name to be just a tag that the user places on some
resource. It is the resource's ID that is unique.
I
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:02 AM, joehuang joehu...@huawei.com wrote:
Hello, Russell,
Many thanks for your reply. See inline comments.
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 5:22 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Pasquale Porreca
pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au wrote:
Well, one of the main reason to choose an open source product is to avoid
vendor lock-in. I think it is not
advisable to embed in the software running in an instance a call to
OpenStack specific
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-12-11 05:43:46 -0800:
On 12/11/2014 07:22 AM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
Hello everyone!
In neutron there is a rather old bug [1] about adding uniqueness for
security group name and tenant id. I found this idea reasonable and
started working on
First, I agree that it's much friendlier to have unique security group names
and not have to use UUIDs since when there is a need for more than a default,
the Tennant admin will want to be able to easily track info related to it, plus
in the GUI, if it allows a new one to be created, it should
On 11/12/14 01:14, Anant Patil wrote:
On 04-Dec-14 10:49, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote:
On GitHub:https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc
I'm trying to review this code at the moment, and finding some stuff I
don't understand:
On 11/12/14 08:26, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
[Murugan, Visnusaran]
In case of rollback where we have to cleanup earlier version of resources,
we could get the order from old template. We'd prefer not to have a graph
table.
In theory you could get it by keeping old templates around. But that
Hi guys,
I apologize for taking so long to get to this, but I think once we start
meeting, our momentum will build.
I'm cross posting this to dev and operators so anyone who is interested can
participate. I've set up a Doodle to vote on the first set of times (these
happen to work for me and
Got it. Thanks! We will soon add the blueprint for IPMI meters in Horizon.
Thanks
Xiaohui
From: David Lyle [mailto:dkly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 1:10 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Proposal to add
Hi, Jay,
Good question, see inline comments, pls.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 1:58 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [PTL] Cascading
So I think u mean 'proprietary'?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/proprietary
-Josh
joehuang wrote:
Hi, Jay,
Good question, see inline comments, pls.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday,
Tihomir,
Your comments in the patch were the actually the clearest to me about ease of
customizing without requiring upstream changes and really made me think more
about your points.
Here are a couple of bullet points for consideration.
* Will we take on auto-discovery of API extensions
Hello, Andrew,
Thanks for your confirmation. See inline comments, pls.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 3:56 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [PTL] Cascading vs.
Hello, Joe
Thank you for your good question.
Question:
How would something like flavors work across multiple vendors. The OpenStack
API doesn't have any hard coded names and sizes for flavors. So a flavor such
as m1.tiny may actually be very different vendor to vendor.
Answer:
The flavor is
Hello, Joshua,
Sorry, my fault. You are right. I owe you two dollars.
Best regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:harlo...@outlook.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 9:47 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
+100!
So, for the vif-type-vhostuser, a general script path name replace the
vif-detail vhost_user_ovs_plug, because it's not the responsibility
of nova to understand it.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 04:15:00PM +0100,
On Fri Dec 12 2014 at 1:06:08 PM Tripp, Travis S travis.tr...@hp.com
wrote:
Do we really need the lines:
project = api.keystone.tenant_get(request, id)
kwargs = _tenant_kwargs_from_DATA(request.DATA, enabled=None)
I agree that if you already have all the data it is really bad to have
Hi,
Now We can deploying Docker containers in an OpenStack environment using Heat.
But I feel confused.
Could someone can tell me does the heat-docker supports monitoring the Docker
container in a stack and how to monitor it?
Does it supports auto-scaling the Docker container?
Best Regards,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:25 PM, joehuang joehu...@huawei.com wrote:
Hello, Joe
Thank you for your good question.
Question:
How would something like flavors work across multiple vendors. The
OpenStack API doesn't have any hard coded names and sizes for flavors. So a
flavor such as
[joehuang] Could you pls. make it more clear for the deployment mode
of cells when used for globally distributed DCs with single API. Do
you mean cinder/neutron/glance/ceilometer will be shared by all
cells, and use RPC for inter-dc communication, and only support one
vendor's OpenStack
So you are using heat docker driver but not nova docker driver, right?
If you are using nova docker driver, then the container was treated as VM
and you can do monitoring and auto scaling with heat.
But with heat docker driver, it talk to docker host directly which you need
to define in HEAT
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
Yes, I really think this is a key point. When we introduced the VIF type
mechanism we never intended for there to be soo many different VIF types
created. There is a very small, finite number of possible ways to
HI,
I want your thoughts on blueprint 'Log Request ID Mappings' for cross projects.
BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/log-request-id-mappings
It will enable operators to get request id's mappings easily and will be useful
in analysing logs effectively.
For logging 'Request ID
Maybe put all these different context under a kwarg called context?
For example,
ctx = {
env: {...},
global: {...},
runtime: {
execution_id: ...,
task_id: ...,
...
}
}
action = SomeMistralAction(context=ctx)
IMO, that is a nice idea. I
Filed spec @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141220/
Comments welcome :-)
-Josh
Joshua Harlow wrote:
Ya,
I to was surprised by the general lack of this kind of library on pypi.
One would think u know that people deprecate stuff, but maybe this isn't
the norm for python... Why deprecate
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
[joehuang] Could you pls. make it more clear for the deployment mode
of cells when used for globally distributed DCs with single API. Do
you mean cinder/neutron/glance/ceilometer will be shared by all
cells, and use RPC for
hi,
good to hear.
do you have any estimate when it will be available?
will it cover dom0 side of the code found in
neutron/plugins/openvswitch/agent/xenapi?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
Hi Yamamoto,
XenAPI and Neutron do work well together, and we have an private CI that is
running Neutron jobs. As
Hi Joe,
Thank you to lead us to deep diving into cascading. My answer is listed below
your question.
I don't think this is sufficient. If the underlying hardware the
between multiple vendors is different setting the same values for
a flavor will result in different performance
Hello, Dan,
Correct, cells only applies to single-vendor distributed deployments.
In both its current and future forms, it uses private APIs for
communication between the components, and thus isn't suited for a
multi-vendor environment.
Thank you for your confirmation. My doubt is what's
88 matches
Mail list logo
