Hi Sean,
Will be great to meet in person and discuss QoS adoption path.
Count me in,
Irena
-Original Message-
From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 8:17 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject:
I believe Déjà vu is an appropriate term here. :-)
Count me in.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Collins, Sean
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Hi,
Like Atlanta, I will be at the summit. If there is interest, I can
schedule a time to talk about the QoS API extension.
--
Sean M.
This is very interesting problem to solve.
I am curious to know how the reachability is provided across different
Datacenter.
How to know which VM is part of which Datacenter?
VM may be in different Zone but under same DC or in different DC itself.
How this problem is solved?
thanks regards,
Some of us are looking at a different model. I’d be interested in your thoughts.
The premise in this is that a great deal of the complexity in OpenStack is
basically working around the deficiencies of IPv4, especially its address space
and issues in multicast deployment. IPv6 actually addresses
Hi,
I'm not sure whether following issue is problematic, and both, our team do some
effort, so I submit two blueprints:
[1.] optimize dvr flows:
Currently, accurate ovs flows in terms of full mac are used to communicate
among distributed router, but here comes problem : (1)the more distributed
Hi all,
first of all, it was bad idea to get FF and TechPreview at the same day. We
are in rush with merging last features, so master often becomes unstable.
Tech Preview still implies that there is something deployable at least to
see Juno in action. As we planned to do a tech preview on this
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 20:01:40, Kevin Benton wrote:
I think the simplest use case is just that a provider doesn't want to
deal with extending L2 domains all over their datacenter.
This is the core motivation. As mentioned in Fred Baker's internet draft[0],
extending layer 2 domains can be
joehuang wrote:
Is the cascading included in the session Approaches for scaling out [1] ?
Yes it is. The goal of the session is to get the proponents of the
various scaling out approaches in the same room so that they compare
notes and potentially converge.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
On 28/10/14 21:23 +0100, Philip Cheong wrote:
Hi all,
In preparation of the OpenStack Summit in Paris next week, I'm hoping to speak
to some people in the OpenStack foundation about the benefits of a partnership
with Hashicorp, who make fantastic tools like Vagrant and Packer (and others).
As
Hi Ricardo,
thanks a lot for your help and detailed instructions. It will surely
come in handy when I will need to do something like that. I am looking
also into this possibility.
But the actual reason I need to sync our central developer repo with the
Gerrit repo is a problem when the
Thanks for the feedback.
OK, got it, nova networking is not a requirement for a CI. Then I'll see
not a single reason to support it. We will investigate in the neutron
way for our CI and also for production.
Now coming back to the Hypervisorsupportmatrix
(
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:09:44PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote:
The API provides an endpoint for querying the serial console of an
instance ('os-getSerialConsole'). The nova-client interacts with this
API endpoint via the command `get-serial-console`.
nova get-serial-console myInstance
Hi,
I am using all-in-one Havana on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, working on Ceilometer and
Heat. I want to launch an instance based on a threshold defined in alarm.
My question is where and how am I supposed to define the webhook URL for
--alarm-actions argument. I am creating threshold alarm with the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:52:34AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote:
On 29/10/14 09:28, Steve Baker wrote:
snip
I've looked at the tripleo templates now, and they create ports which are
resources in their own right, so switching to replacement_policy:AUTO is
entirely appropriate. However
Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our
commit messages sets a bad precedent? Or was there a discussion on this topic
that I missed?
Maru
On Jun 17, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
There is an action for creating a Gerrit
On Oct 29, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Yangxurong yangxur...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
I’m not sure whether following issue is problematic, and both, our team do
some effort, so I submit two blueprints:
[1.] optimize dvr flows:
Currently, accurate ovs flows in terms of full mac are used to
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:19:49PM +0500, david jhon wrote:
Hi,
I am using all-in-one Havana on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, working on Ceilometer
and Heat. I want to launch an instance based on a threshold defined in
alarm. My question is where and how am I supposed to define the webhook
Yeh, this seems incredibly poluting, don't do this. That's not something
I want in our long term git history without conversation about the
policy. Every other Impact flag that we use in OpenStack had a pretty
long conversation about it's addition.
The issue arrises because the NFV team has
On 10/28/2014 10:03 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 10/14/2014 04:03 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
Maybe it is time for a release? One thing; does the pre-release check
run over TOT devstack and ensure there are no errors? We don't want
to release and then 10 minutes later gate jobs start failing.
I have also started to capture some of our discussions here.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RoutedNetworking
Thanks
Rohit
On 10/29/14 1:32 AM, Cory Benfield cory.benfi...@metaswitch.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 20:01:40, Kevin Benton wrote:
I think the simplest use case is just that a
On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa
If you have any schedule changes to propose for really bad conflicts,
please let me
Hello,
it seems like the BGP dynamic routing it is in a good shape to be included
in Neutron during Kilo[1]. There is quite interest in offer BGP-VPN too.
Mathieu Rohon's spec[2] goes in this direction. Of course it makes sense
that his development leverages the BGP one.
I would like to have a
- Original Message -
From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our
commit messages sets a bad precedent? Or was there a
On 10/29/2014 07:25 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our
commit
On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary
- Original Message -
From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 10/29/2014 07:25 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
- Original Message -
From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maru Newby
Hi Alex,
You can continue the work https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88983/ from here
;-)
2014-10-29 13:42 GMT+08:00 Chen CH Ji jiche...@cn.ibm.com:
Yes, I remember that spec might talk about local storage (in local db?)
and it can be the root cause
And I think we need persistent storage
I find our current design is remove all flows then add flow by entry, this
will cause every network node will break off all tunnels between other
network node and all compute node.
Perhaps a way around this would be to add a flag on agent startup
which would have it skip reprogramming
On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa
If you have any schedule changes to propose
Sent from my iPad
On 2014-10-29, at 下午8:01, Robert van Leeuwen robert.vanleeu...@spilgames.com
wrote:
I find our current design is remove all flows then add flow by entry, this
will cause every network node will break off all tunnels between other
network node and all compute node.
On 10/29/2014 08:20 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
Sent from my iPad
On 2014-10-29, at 下午6:33, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 29, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Yangxurong yangxur...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
I’m not sure whether following issue is problematic, and both, our team do
some effort, so I submit two blueprints:
[1.] optimize
Hah, thanks :), Let me see if I can help on that.
2014-10-29 19:59 GMT+08:00 Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com:
Hi Alex,
You can continue the work https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88983/ from
here ;-)
2014-10-29 13:42 GMT+08:00 Chen CH Ji jiche...@cn.ibm.com:
Yes, I remember that spec might
2014-10-29 13:42 GMT+08:00 Chen CH Ji jiche...@cn.ibm.com:
Yes, I remember that spec might talk about local storage (in local db?)
and it can be the root cause
And I think we need persistent storage otherwise the scheduler hints can't
survive in some conditions such as system reboot or
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Ondrej Wisniewski
ondrej.wisniew...@dektech.com.au wrote:
Hi Ricardo,
thanks a lot for your help and detailed instructions. It will surely come
in handy when I will need to do something like that. I am looking also into
this possibility.
But the actual
On 10/28/2014 02:50 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Dan Genin daniel.ge...@jhuapl.edu
mailto:daniel.ge...@jhuapl.edu wrote:
Great, thank you, Duncan. I will then proceed with the shared
volume group.
Dan
On 10/28/2014 02:06 PM, Duncan Thomas
Hi everyone,
Less than one week from the Kilo design summit start, the schedule is
almost final. You can start planning your week and access it at:
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/
It should also be mirrored to the mobile Guidebook app. In doubt, sched
is always more current.
We still expect
On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa
If you have any schedule changes to propose
Hi Dolph,
I guess it sounds complicated but in the end our setup is really not
much different from the community workflow, a least this is the
intention. What I am trying to achieve is a possibility for the team of
developers to share code among each other by using a central Git
repository.
Nope, there isn't a puppet module for deploying Tuskar, but starting one
makes sense.
On 10/28/2014 06:04 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at deploying Tuskar API with Puppet and I was wondering if
you guys have already worked on a Puppet module.
If not, I think we could start
Hi
I want to use both ipv4 and ipv6 for floating ip at the same time. However,
I have the following issue when setting router gateway or associate
floating ip to an instance.
Is it supported in the first place? What should I do to make it work?
Thanks!
neutron router-list
Yes, the aim is to get a vagrant-openstack provider plugin under
Hashicorp's or Mitchellh's github account. Whether you call that official
or blessed, doesn't really matter.
In order for Vagrant to integrate with other tools such as Packer there
needs to be a preferred plugin. Hopefully the
Hi everyone,
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
tomorrow Thursday, October 30th at 22:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting
channel.
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
Anyone is welcome
Yes, actually, we have done some effort and practice to ensure that dvr has
a better performance and stability, but i am not sure whether it would be
accepted, so that's why i say : (I’m not sure whether the following issue
is problematic…). in my opinion, i think it's very helpful.
2014-10-29
Hi,
+1
thanks
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe Déjà vu is an appropriate term here. :-)
Count me in.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Collins, Sean
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Hi,
Like Atlanta, I will be at the summit. If
On Oct 29, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Hly henry4...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPad
On 2014-10-29, at 下午6:33, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 29, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Yangxurong yangxur...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
I’m not sure whether following issue is problematic, and both,
Based on the thread this morning around the NFVImpact flag [1], I saw
this commit [2] into the neutron-specs repository to add an APIImpact
flag. Given the discussion around NFVImpact, and the move away from
it, I just wanted to bring this up in the broader community context
and make sure everyone
Hi,
thanks jaume for planning this bof.
the bgpvpn spec [2] has been initiated by nati ueno. I hope nati will
attend this bof too.
our proposal is to try to implement this spec with existing Neutron
components [4].
Me and thomas will also have a tech talk about BGPVPN on tuesday, 1:15 PM. [5]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Hly henry4...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPad
On 2014-10-29, at 下午8:01, Robert van Leeuwen
robert.vanleeu...@spilgames.com wrote:
I find our current design is remove all flows then add flow by entry, this
will cause every network node will break off
On Oct 28, 2014, at 12:44 AM, A, Keshava keshav...@hp.com wrote:
Here thinking OpenStack cloud as hierarchical network instead of Flat
network ?
A routed network has one lookup just like a bridged network. The difference is
that the router operates as a host in the L2 domain - it only
On 29/10/14 15:30 +0100, Philip Cheong wrote:
Yes, the aim is to get a vagrant-openstack provider plugin under Hashicorp's or
Mitchellh's github account. Whether you call that official or blessed,
doesn't really matter.
In order for Vagrant to integrate with other tools such as Packer there
Team,
See below. For those of us attending the OpenStack Summit in Paris, please be
sure to plan your schedule so you can attend this session.
Thanks,
Adrian
Begin forwarded message:
From: Chris Hoge ch...@openstack.org
Subject: Solum Design Session at OpenStack Summit
Date: October 22,
Hey,
this is just a friendly reminder that we're skipping the meeting this
week as it is so close to the summit and many are travelling already.
We also wont have one the week of the summit for obvious reasons.
See you all in Paris!
Michael
--
Rackspace Australia
Hi everyone,
Before we start the larger discussion at summit next week about the future of
testing in OpenStack - specifically about spinning up functional testing and how
it relates to tempest - I would like to share some of my thoughts on how we can
get things started and how I think they'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 25/10/14 00:16, James E. Blair wrote:
Andrea Frittoli andrea.fritt...@gmail.com writes:
I also believe we can find ways to make post-merge / periodic
checks useful. We need to do that to keep the gate to a sane
scale.
Yes, we have a plan
I'm sorry I've missed the email that you referred to before. Indeed,
it looks like I'm not the first one who started to think about the
matter. Summit wise, will there be any sessions where the subject will
be discussed?
Yes.
About post merge CI:
Hi,
I've just swapped the functional testing and object status sessions in
our track. This was done so that the QA team could attend the
functional testing session, which originally conflicted with their
sessions. Hopefully this doesn't create problems for anyone else, but
I figured an
Noted. Looking forward to the face time.
Lee
On 10/29/14, 9:30 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Team,
See below. For those of us attending the OpenStack Summit in Paris,
please be sure to plan your schedule so you can attend this session.
Thanks,
Adrian
Begin forwarded
On 10/29/2014 11:05 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
Based on the thread this morning around the NFVImpact flag [1], I saw
this commit [2] into the neutron-specs repository to add an APIImpact
flag. Given the discussion around NFVImpact, and the move away from
it, I just wanted to bring this up in the
+1
Thanks for the heads up! See you there!
On 29 October 2014 19:15, Lee Calcote (lecalcot) lecal...@cisco.com wrote:
Noted. Looking forward to the face time.
Lee
On 10/29/14, 9:30 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Team,
See below. For those of us attending the
I must admit I haven't digged up too much, but this might also look
suspicious:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96782/
Perhaps it's a combination of both? :)
On 29 October 2014 08:17, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Hly henry4...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of us are looking at a different model. I’d be interested in your
thoughts.
Fred,
Thanks for the link to the drafts. They look extremely similar to the
approach we've been pursuing for Project Calico, and it's good to see
that we're not the only people thinking in this direction.
It
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Andreas Scheuring
scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
OK, got it, nova networking is not a requirement for a CI. Then I'll see
not a single reason to support it. We will investigate in the neutron
way for our CI and also for
Certainly, let’s talk next week in Paris.
On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Cory Benfield cory.benfi...@metaswitch.com
wrote:
Some of us are looking at a different model. I’d be interested in your
thoughts.
Fred,
Thanks for the link to the drafts. They look extremely similar to the
On 29/10/14 23:22, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:52:34AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote:
On 29/10/14 09:28, Steve Baker wrote:
snip
I've looked at the tripleo templates now, and they create ports which are
resources in their own right, so switching to
On 10/29/2014 07:02 AM, Ondrej Wisniewski wrote:
If I understand correctly, we cannot use the OpenStack community Git
servers as our central Git repository since developers cannot push to
them. And we don't want to go through Gerrit and the code review
procedure just to share a bit of code
Folks,
I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent TC election,
so I quickly ran the numbers myself.
Voter Turnout
=
The turnout rate continues to decline, in this case from 29.7% to 26.7%.
Here's how the participation rates have shaped up since the first TC2.0
On Oct 29, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Philip Cheong philip.che...@elastx.se wrote:
Yes, the aim is to get a vagrant-openstack provider plugin under Hashicorp's
or Mitchellh's github account. Whether you call that official or blessed,
doesn't really matter.
In order for Vagrant to integrate with
Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack session or the
logging session from their current joint (and conflicting) time (15:40)? QA
really would be appreciated at both. And I'd really like to be at both. I'd
say the Refstack one would go better in the debug slot, as the
On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Folks,
I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent TC election,
so I quickly ran the numbers myself.
Voter Turnout
=
The turnout rate continues to decline, in this case from 29.7% to
On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Folks,
I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent TC election,
so I quickly ran the numbers myself.
Voter Turnout
=
The turnout rate continues to decline, in this case
On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack
session or the logging session from their current joint (and
conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both.
And I'd really like to be at both. I'd say the
Excerpts from Eoghan Glynn's message of 2014-10-29 16:37:42 -0700:
On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Folks,
I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent TC election,
so I quickly ran the numbers myself.
Voter Turnout
+1, the hint should be persistent as other server instance metadata.
From: Alex Xu [sou...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:11 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Add scheduler-hints
On 2014-10-29 18:27:48 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
IIRC, there is no method for removing foundation members. So there
are likely a number of people listed who have moved on to other
activities and are no longer involved with OpenStack. I'd actually
be quite interested to see the turnout
Hi Matt,
Thanks for bringing this up, I am so interested in.
2014-10-30 1:30 GMT+09:00 Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org:
Before we start the larger discussion at summit next week about the future of
testing in OpenStack - specifically about spinning up functional testing and
how
it
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Eoghan Glynn's message of 2014-10-29 16:37:42 -0700:
On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Folks,
I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent
Hi keshava,
Thanks for interested in Cascading. Here are some very simple explanation:
Basically Datacenter is not in the 2-level tree of cascading. We use term POD
to represent a cascaded child openstack (same meaning of your term Zone?).
There may be single or multiple PODs in one
On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack
session or the logging session from their current joint (and
conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both.
And I'd
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2014-10-29 18:37:42 -0700:
On 2014-10-29 18:27:48 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
IIRC, there is no method for removing foundation members. So there
are likely a number of people listed who have moved on to other
activities and are no longer
Hi,
Thank you Steven,
I followed templates given there in examples, created one for me(see
attached), but I am getting following error in /var/log/heat/heat-api.log
file:
2014-10-30 10:07:44.749 30476 TRACE root
2014-10-30 10:07:44.749 30476 TRACE root File
Thanks for your confirmation.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
From: Thierry Carrez [thie...@openstack.org]
Sent: 29 October 2014 16:55
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit
Hello, Keshava,
Wu described the simplified pictures of cascading as following, if you attend
Paris summit, you can join the cross-project design summit session approached
for scaling out, cascading will also be discussed in this session, we can have
f2f talk in more detail.
Best Regards
84 matches
Mail list logo