Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit

2014-10-29 Thread Irena Berezovsky
Hi Sean, Will be great to meet in person and discuss QoS adoption path. Count me in, Irena -Original Message- From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 8:17 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit

2014-10-29 Thread Kevin Benton
I believe Déjà vu is an appropriate term here. :-) Count me in. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Hi, Like Atlanta, I will be at the summit. If there is interest, I can schedule a time to talk about the QoS API extension. -- Sean M.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-29 Thread keshava
This is very interesting problem to solve. I am curious to know how the reachability is provided across different Datacenter. How to know which VM is part of which Datacenter? VM may be in different Zone but under same DC or in different DC itself. How this problem is solved? thanks regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] New specs on routed networking

2014-10-29 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
Some of us are looking at a different model. I’d be interested in your thoughts. The premise in this is that a great deal of the complexity in OpenStack is basically working around the deficiencies of IPv4, especially its address space and issues in multicast deployment. IPv6 actually addresses

[openstack-dev] [Neutron]issue about dvr flows and port timestamp

2014-10-29 Thread Yangxurong
Hi, I'm not sure whether following issue is problematic, and both, our team do some effort, so I submit two blueprints: [1.] optimize dvr flows: Currently, accurate ovs flows in terms of full mac are used to communicate among distributed router, but here comes problem : (1)the more distributed

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Feature Freeze Fuel Technical Preview

2014-10-29 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Hi all, first of all, it was bad idea to get FF and TechPreview at the same day. We are in rush with merging last features, so master often becomes unstable. Tech Preview still implies that there is something deployable at least to see Juno in action. As we planned to do a tech preview on this

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] New specs on routed networking

2014-10-29 Thread Cory Benfield
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 20:01:40, Kevin Benton wrote: I think the simplest use case is just that a provider doesn't want to deal with extending L2 domains all over their datacenter. This is the core motivation. As mentioned in Fred Baker's internet draft[0], extending layer 2 domains can be

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

2014-10-29 Thread Thierry Carrez
joehuang wrote: Is the cascading included in the session Approaches for scaling out [1] ? Yes it is. The goal of the session is to get the proponents of the various scaling out approaches in the same room so that they compare notes and potentially converge. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Bringing some DevOps love to Openstack

2014-10-29 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 28/10/14 21:23 +0100, Philip Cheong wrote: Hi all, In preparation of the OpenStack Summit in Paris next week, I'm hoping to speak to some people in the OpenStack foundation about the benefits of a partnership with Hashicorp, who make fantastic tools like Vagrant and Packer (and others). As

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][all] Synchronizing local Git and Gerrit repositories

2014-10-29 Thread Ondrej Wisniewski
Hi Ricardo, thanks a lot for your help and detailed instructions. It will surely come in handy when I will need to do something like that. I am looking also into this possibility. But the actual reason I need to sync our central developer repo with the Gerrit repo is a problem when the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][CI] nova-networking or neutron netwokring for CI

2014-10-29 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Thanks for the feedback. OK, got it, nova networking is not a requirement for a CI. Then I'll see not a single reason to support it. We will investigate in the neutron way for our CI and also for production. Now coming back to the Hypervisorsupportmatrix (

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to connect to a serial port of an instance via websocket?

2014-10-29 Thread Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:09:44PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote: The API provides an endpoint for querying the serial console of an instance ('os-getSerialConsole'). The nova-client interacts with this API endpoint via the command `get-serial-console`. nova get-serial-console myInstance

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Heat]Defining a webhook URL for alarm-actions

2014-10-29 Thread david jhon
Hi, I am using all-in-one Havana on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, working on Ceilometer and Heat. I want to launch an instance based on a threshold defined in alarm. My question is where and how am I supposed to define the webhook URL for --alarm-actions argument. I am creating threshold alarm with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][nova] Changing default replacement_policy for Neutron port?

2014-10-29 Thread Steven Hardy
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:52:34AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: On 29/10/14 09:28, Steve Baker wrote: snip I've looked at the tripleo templates now, and they create ports which are resources in their own right, so switching to replacement_policy:AUTO is entirely appropriate. However

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Maru Newby
Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our commit messages sets a bad precedent? Or was there a discussion on this topic that I missed? Maru On Jun 17, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, There is an action for creating a Gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]issue about dvr flows and port timestamp

2014-10-29 Thread Maru Newby
On Oct 29, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Yangxurong yangxur...@huawei.com wrote: Hi, I’m not sure whether following issue is problematic, and both, our team do some effort, so I submit two blueprints: [1.] optimize dvr flows: Currently, accurate ovs flows in terms of full mac are used to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Heat]Defining a webhook URL for alarm-actions

2014-10-29 Thread Steven Hardy
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:19:49PM +0500, david jhon wrote: Hi, I am using all-in-one Havana on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, working on Ceilometer and Heat. I want to launch an instance based on a threshold defined in alarm. My question is where and how am I supposed to define the webhook

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Sean Dague
Yeh, this seems incredibly poluting, don't do this. That's not something I want in our long term git history without conversation about the policy. Every other Impact flag that we use in OpenStack had a pretty long conversation about it's addition. The issue arrises because the NFV team has

Re: [openstack-dev] [bashate] towards inbox zero on bashate changes, release?

2014-10-29 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/28/2014 10:03 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: On 10/14/2014 04:03 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: Maybe it is time for a release? One thing; does the pre-release check run over TOT devstack and ensure there are no errors? We don't want to release and then 10 minutes later gate jobs start failing.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] New specs on routed networking

2014-10-29 Thread Rohit Agarwalla (roagarwa)
I have also started to capture some of our discussions here. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RoutedNetworking Thanks Rohit On 10/29/14 1:32 AM, Cory Benfield cory.benfi...@metaswitch.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 20:01:40, Kevin Benton wrote: I think the simplest use case is just that a

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

2014-10-29 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track: http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa If you have any schedule changes to propose for really bad conflicts, please let me

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP - VPN BoF session in Kilo design summit

2014-10-29 Thread Jaume Devesa
Hello, it seems like the BGP dynamic routing it is in a good shape to be included in Neutron during Kilo[1]. There is quite interest in offer BGP-VPN too. Mathieu Rohon's spec[2] goes in this direction. Of course it makes sense that his development leverages the BGP one. I would like to have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our commit messages sets a bad precedent? Or was there a

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/29/2014 07:25 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our commit

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Maru Newby
On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On 10/29/2014 07:25 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Maru Newby

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Add scheduler-hints when migration/rebuild/evacuate

2014-10-29 Thread Jay Lau
Hi Alex, You can continue the work https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88983/ from here ;-) 2014-10-29 13:42 GMT+08:00 Chen CH Ji jiche...@cn.ibm.com: Yes, I remember that spec might talk about local storage (in local db?) and it can be the root cause And I think we need persistent storage

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Clear all flows when ovs agent start? why and how avoid?

2014-10-29 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
I find our current design is remove all flows then add flow by entry, this will cause every network node will break off all tunnels between other network node and all compute node. Perhaps a way around this would be to add a flag on agent startup which would have it skip reprogramming

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

2014-10-29 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track: http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa If you have any schedule changes to propose

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Clear all flows when ovs agent start? why and how avoid?

2014-10-29 Thread Hly
Sent from my iPad On 2014-10-29, at 下午8:01, Robert van Leeuwen robert.vanleeu...@spilgames.com wrote: I find our current design is remove all flows then add flow by entry, this will cause every network node will break off all tunnels between other network node and all compute node.

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

2014-10-29 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/29/2014 08:20 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]issue about dvr flows and port timestamp

2014-10-29 Thread Hly
Sent from my iPad On 2014-10-29, at 下午6:33, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: On Oct 29, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Yangxurong yangxur...@huawei.com wrote: Hi, I’m not sure whether following issue is problematic, and both, our team do some effort, so I submit two blueprints: [1.] optimize

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Add scheduler-hints when migration/rebuild/evacuate

2014-10-29 Thread Alex Xu
Hah, thanks :), Let me see if I can help on that. 2014-10-29 19:59 GMT+08:00 Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com: Hi Alex, You can continue the work https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88983/ from here ;-) 2014-10-29 13:42 GMT+08:00 Chen CH Ji jiche...@cn.ibm.com: Yes, I remember that spec might

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Add scheduler-hints when migration/rebuild/evacuate

2014-10-29 Thread Alex Xu
2014-10-29 13:42 GMT+08:00 Chen CH Ji jiche...@cn.ibm.com: Yes, I remember that spec might talk about local storage (in local db?) and it can be the root cause And I think we need persistent storage otherwise the scheduler hints can't survive in some conditions such as system reboot or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][all] Synchronizing local Git and Gerrit repositories

2014-10-29 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Ondrej Wisniewski ondrej.wisniew...@dektech.com.au wrote: Hi Ricardo, thanks a lot for your help and detailed instructions. It will surely come in handy when I will need to do something like that. I am looking also into this possibility. But the actual

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Enable LVM ephemeral storage for Nova

2014-10-29 Thread Dan Genin
On 10/28/2014 02:50 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Dan Genin daniel.ge...@jhuapl.edu mailto:daniel.ge...@jhuapl.edu wrote: Great, thank you, Duncan. I will then proceed with the shared volume group. Dan On 10/28/2014 02:06 PM, Duncan Thomas

[openstack-dev] Kilo Design Summit schedule

2014-10-29 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, Less than one week from the Kilo design summit start, the schedule is almost final. You can start planning your week and access it at: http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/ It should also be mirrored to the mobile Guidebook app. In doubt, sched is always more current. We still expect

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

2014-10-29 Thread Jay Pipes
On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track: http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa If you have any schedule changes to propose

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][all] Synchronizing local Git and Gerrit repositories

2014-10-29 Thread Ondrej Wisniewski
Hi Dolph, I guess it sounds complicated but in the end our setup is really not much different from the community workflow, a least this is the intention. What I am trying to achieve is a possibility for the team of developers to share code among each other by using a central Git repository.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tuskar] Puppet module

2014-10-29 Thread Jay Dobies
Nope, there isn't a puppet module for deploying Tuskar, but starting one makes sense. On 10/28/2014 06:04 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hi, I was looking at deploying Tuskar API with Puppet and I was wondering if you guys have already worked on a Puppet module. If not, I think we could start

[openstack-dev] ipv6 and ipv4 dual stack for floating IP

2014-10-29 Thread Jerry Xinyu Zhao
Hi I want to use both ipv4 and ipv6 for floating ip at the same time. However, I have the following issue when setting router gateway or associate floating ip to an instance. Is it supported in the first place? What should I do to make it work? Thanks! neutron router-list

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Bringing some DevOps love to Openstack

2014-10-29 Thread Philip Cheong
Yes, the aim is to get a vagrant-openstack provider plugin under Hashicorp's or Mitchellh's github account. Whether you call that official or blessed, doesn't really matter. In order for Vagrant to integrate with other tools such as Packer there needs to be a preferred plugin. Hopefully the

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday October 30th at 22:00 UTC

2014-10-29 Thread Matthew Treinish
Hi everyone, Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be tomorrow Thursday, October 30th at 22:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting Anyone is welcome

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]issue about dvr flows and port timestamp

2014-10-29 Thread Xurong Yang
Yes, actually, we have done some effort and practice to ensure that dvr has a better performance and stability, but i am not sure whether it would be accepted, so that's why i say : (I’m not sure whether the following issue is problematic…). in my opinion, i think it's very helpful. 2014-10-29

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit

2014-10-29 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi, +1 thanks On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: I believe Déjà vu is an appropriate term here. :-) Count me in. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Hi, Like Atlanta, I will be at the summit. If

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]issue about dvr flows and port timestamp

2014-10-29 Thread Maru Newby
On Oct 29, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Hly henry4...@gmail.com wrote: Sent from my iPad On 2014-10-29, at 下午6:33, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: On Oct 29, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Yangxurong yangxur...@huawei.com wrote: Hi, I’m not sure whether following issue is problematic, and both,

[openstack-dev] [all] Commit flags

2014-10-29 Thread Kyle Mestery
Based on the thread this morning around the NFVImpact flag [1], I saw this commit [2] into the neutron-specs repository to add an APIImpact flag. Given the discussion around NFVImpact, and the move away from it, I just wanted to bring this up in the broader community context and make sure everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP - VPN BoF session in Kilo design summit

2014-10-29 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi, thanks jaume for planning this bof. the bgpvpn spec [2] has been initiated by nati ueno. I hope nati will attend this bof too. our proposal is to try to implement this spec with existing Neutron components [4]. Me and thomas will also have a tech talk about BGPVPN on tuesday, 1:15 PM. [5]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Clear all flows when ovs agent start? why and how avoid?

2014-10-29 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Hly henry4...@gmail.com wrote: Sent from my iPad On 2014-10-29, at 下午8:01, Robert van Leeuwen robert.vanleeu...@spilgames.com wrote: I find our current design is remove all flows then add flow by entry, this will cause every network node will break off

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] New specs on routed networking

2014-10-29 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
On Oct 28, 2014, at 12:44 AM, A, Keshava keshav...@hp.com wrote: Here thinking OpenStack cloud as hierarchical network instead of Flat network ? A routed network has one lookup just like a bridged network. The difference is that the router operates as a host in the L2 domain - it only

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Bringing some DevOps love to Openstack

2014-10-29 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 29/10/14 15:30 +0100, Philip Cheong wrote: Yes, the aim is to get a vagrant-openstack provider plugin under Hashicorp's or Mitchellh's github account. Whether you call that official or blessed, doesn't really matter. In order for Vagrant to integrate with other tools such as Packer there

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Solum Design Session at OpenStack Summit

2014-10-29 Thread Adrian Otto
Team, See below. For those of us attending the OpenStack Summit in Paris, please be sure to plan your schedule so you can attend this session. Thanks, Adrian Begin forwarded message: From: Chris Hoge ch...@openstack.org Subject: Solum Design Session at OpenStack Summit Date: October 22,

[openstack-dev] [Nova] No meeting this week

2014-10-29 Thread Michael Still
Hey, this is just a friendly reminder that we're skipping the meeting this week as it is so close to the summit and many are travelling already. We also wont have one the week of the summit for obvious reasons. See you all in Paris! Michael -- Rackspace Australia

[openstack-dev] [QA][All] Prelude to functional testing summit discussions

2014-10-29 Thread Matthew Treinish
Hi everyone, Before we start the larger discussion at summit next week about the future of testing in OpenStack - specifically about spinning up functional testing and how it relates to tempest - I would like to share some of my thoughts on how we can get things started and how I think they'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] periodic jobs for master

2014-10-29 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 25/10/14 00:16, James E. Blair wrote: Andrea Frittoli andrea.fritt...@gmail.com writes: I also believe we can find ways to make post-merge / periodic checks useful. We need to do that to keep the gate to a sane scale. Yes, we have a plan

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] periodic jobs for master

2014-10-29 Thread Andrea Frittoli
I'm sorry I've missed the email that you referred to before. Indeed, it looks like I'm not the first one who started to think about the matter. Summit wise, will there be any sessions where the subject will be discussed? Yes. About post merge CI:

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Summit track scheduling tweak

2014-10-29 Thread Michael Still
Hi, I've just swapped the functional testing and object status sessions in our track. This was done so that the QA team could attend the functional testing session, which originally conflicted with their sessions. Hopefully this doesn't create problems for anyone else, but I figured an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Solum Design Session at OpenStack Summit

2014-10-29 Thread Lee Calcote (lecalcot)
Noted. Looking forward to the face time. Lee On 10/29/14, 9:30 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Team, See below. For those of us attending the OpenStack Summit in Paris, please be sure to plan your schedule so you can attend this session. Thanks, Adrian Begin forwarded

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Commit flags

2014-10-29 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/29/2014 11:05 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: Based on the thread this morning around the NFVImpact flag [1], I saw this commit [2] into the neutron-specs repository to add an APIImpact flag. Given the discussion around NFVImpact, and the move away from it, I just wanted to bring this up in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Solum Design Session at OpenStack Summit

2014-10-29 Thread Philip Cheong
+1 Thanks for the heads up! See you there! On 29 October 2014 19:15, Lee Calcote (lecalcot) lecal...@cisco.com wrote: Noted. Looking forward to the face time. Lee On 10/29/14, 9:30 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Team, See below. For those of us attending the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Clear all flows when ovs agent start? why and how avoid?

2014-10-29 Thread Armando M.
I must admit I haven't digged up too much, but this might also look suspicious: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96782/ Perhaps it's a combination of both? :) On 29 October 2014 08:17, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Hly henry4...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] New specs on routed networking

2014-10-29 Thread Cory Benfield
Some of us are looking at a different model. I’d be interested in your thoughts. Fred, Thanks for the link to the drafts. They look extremely similar to the approach we've been pursuing for Project Calico, and it's good to see that we're not the only people thinking in this direction. It

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][CI] nova-networking or neutron netwokring for CI

2014-10-29 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Andreas Scheuring scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Thanks for the feedback. OK, got it, nova networking is not a requirement for a CI. Then I'll see not a single reason to support it. We will investigate in the neutron way for our CI and also for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] New specs on routed networking

2014-10-29 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
Certainly, let’s talk next week in Paris. On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Cory Benfield cory.benfi...@metaswitch.com wrote: Some of us are looking at a different model. I’d be interested in your thoughts. Fred, Thanks for the link to the drafts. They look extremely similar to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][nova] Changing default replacement_policy for Neutron port?

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Baker
On 29/10/14 23:22, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:52:34AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: On 29/10/14 09:28, Steve Baker wrote: snip I've looked at the tripleo templates now, and they create ports which are resources in their own right, so switching to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][all] Synchronizing local Git and Gerrit repositories

2014-10-29 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On 10/29/2014 07:02 AM, Ondrej Wisniewski wrote: If I understand correctly, we cannot use the OpenStack community Git servers as our central Git repository since developers cannot push to them. And we don't want to go through Gerrit and the code review procedure just to share a bit of code

[openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

2014-10-29 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Folks, I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent TC election, so I quickly ran the numbers myself. Voter Turnout = The turnout rate continues to decline, in this case from 29.7% to 26.7%. Here's how the participation rates have shaped up since the first TC2.0

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Bringing some DevOps love to Openstack

2014-10-29 Thread Jim Meyer
On Oct 29, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Philip Cheong philip.che...@elastx.se wrote: Yes, the aim is to get a vagrant-openstack provider plugin under Hashicorp's or Mitchellh's github account. Whether you call that official or blessed, doesn't really matter. In order for Vagrant to integrate with

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

2014-10-29 Thread Rochelle Grober
Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack session or the logging session from their current joint (and conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both. And I'd really like to be at both. I'd say the Refstack one would go better in the debug slot, as the

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

2014-10-29 Thread John Dickinson
On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Folks, I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent TC election, so I quickly ran the numbers myself. Voter Turnout = The turnout rate continues to decline, in this case from 29.7% to

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

2014-10-29 Thread Eoghan Glynn
On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Folks, I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent TC election, so I quickly ran the numbers myself. Voter Turnout = The turnout rate continues to decline, in this case

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

2014-10-29 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack session or the logging session from their current joint (and conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both. And I'd really like to be at both. I'd say the

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

2014-10-29 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Eoghan Glynn's message of 2014-10-29 16:37:42 -0700: On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Folks, I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent TC election, so I quickly ran the numbers myself. Voter Turnout

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Add scheduler-hints when migration/rebuild/evacuate

2014-10-29 Thread Wuhongning
+1, the hint should be persistent as other server instance metadata. From: Alex Xu [sou...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:11 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Add scheduler-hints

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

2014-10-29 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-10-29 18:27:48 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote: IIRC, there is no method for removing foundation members. So there are likely a number of people listed who have moved on to other activities and are no longer involved with OpenStack. I'd actually be quite interested to see the turnout

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][All] Prelude to functional testing summit discussions

2014-10-29 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi Matt, Thanks for bringing this up, I am so interested in. 2014-10-30 1:30 GMT+09:00 Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org: Before we start the larger discussion at summit next week about the future of testing in OpenStack - specifically about spinning up functional testing and how it

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

2014-10-29 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Eoghan Glynn's message of 2014-10-29 16:37:42 -0700: On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Folks, I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-29 Thread Wuhongning
Hi keshava, Thanks for interested in Cascading. Here are some very simple explanation: Basically Datacenter is not in the 2-level tree of cascading. We use term POD to represent a cascaded child openstack (same meaning of your term Zone?). There may be single or multiple PODs in one

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

2014-10-29 Thread Jay Pipes
On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack session or the logging session from their current joint (and conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both. And I'd

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

2014-10-29 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2014-10-29 18:37:42 -0700: On 2014-10-29 18:27:48 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote: IIRC, there is no method for removing foundation members. So there are likely a number of people listed who have moved on to other activities and are no longer

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Heat]Defining a webhook URL for alarm-actions

2014-10-29 Thread david jhon
Hi, Thank you Steven, I followed templates given there in examples, created one for me(see attached), but I am getting following error in /var/log/heat/heat-api.log file: 2014-10-30 10:07:44.749 30476 TRACE root 2014-10-30 10:07:44.749 30476 TRACE root File

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

2014-10-29 Thread joehuang
Thanks for your confirmation. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang ) From: Thierry Carrez [thie...@openstack.org] Sent: 29 October 2014 16:55 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-29 Thread joehuang
Hello, Keshava, Wu described the simplified pictures of cascading as following, if you attend Paris summit, you can join the cross-project design summit session approached for scaling out, cascading will also be discussed in this session, we can have f2f talk in more detail. Best Regards