Clint Byrum said on Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:14:45AM -0800:
holidays. However, I believe James has demonstrated superb review skills
and a commitment to the project that shows broad awareness of the
project.
Big +1. Thanks for taking the time to meta-review, Clint.
Alexis
--
Nova Engineer,
Hi Joehuang,
Thanks for your input and description of the problem.
What you are stating is just have DVR functionality for East-West traffic and
all North-South traffic should go through the Centralized Router.
The North-South distributed reduces the burden in the Centralized Node. We
eventually
On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
As part of the work on dropping the use of the oslo namespace [1], many of
our library repositories now have 2 sets of tests. One set is under the new
package (for example, “oslo_config/tests”), and uses the new
Just to expand a bit on Thai's response.. Make the changes to
horizon/doc/source/contributing.rst and submit a patch, once that gets
approval then
go update the wiki.
On 1/14/2015 3:49 PM, Thai Q Tran wrote:
Wow, that IS interesting. No process required, just modify
On 01/15/2015 08:49 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
Clint Byrum said on Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:14:45AM -0800:
holidays. However, I believe James has demonstrated superb review skills
and a commitment to the project that shows broad awareness of the
project.
Big +1. Thanks for taking the time to
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 10:51 +, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
list instead.
We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we took this
On Jan 15, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Denis Makogon dmako...@mirantis.com wrote:
Good day to All,
The question that i’d like to raise here is not simple one, so i’d like to
involve as much readers as i can. I’d like to speak about oslo.messaging
performance testing. As community we’ve put lots
Hello! Now that we've added James, I have some suggestions for members
that should be dropped.
I have communicated with some of these individuals and confirmed they
are not interested in continuing. So for posterity sake I'm noting
these two removals, effective immediately:
Tzu-mainn Chen
Imre
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 10:14 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hello! It has been a while since we expanded our review team. The
numbers aren't easy to read with recent dips caused by the summit and
holidays. However, I believe James has demonstrated superb review skills
and a commitment to the project
As part of the work on dropping the use of the oslo namespace [1], many of our
library repositories now have 2 sets of tests. One set is under the new package
(for example, “oslo_config/tests”), and uses the new import scheme (“from
oslo_config import cfg”). To protect against regressions in
Good day to All,
The question that i’d like to raise here is not simple one, so i’d like to
involve as much readers as i can. I’d like to speak about
oslo.messaging performance
testing. As community we’ve put lots of efforts in making oslo.messaging
widely used drivers stable as much as possible.
In about 24 hours we've seen 9 core +1's, one non-core +1, and only one
dissenting opinion from James himself which I think we have properly
dismissed. With my nomination counting as an additional +1, that is 10,
which is 50% of the 20 cores active the last 90 days.
I believe this vote has
On 1/13/2015 9:27 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 1/13/2015 12:11 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:00:04AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Looks like the fix we merged didn't actually fix the problem. I have
a patch
[1] to uncap the boto requirement on master and it's failing
On 01/15/2015 09:33 AM, Brian Haley wrote:
On 01/14/2015 02:15 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 01/14/2015 12:57 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
Hi All,
I recently experienced failures getting images from Glance while spawning
instances. This step comes after building the networks in the guild
Excerpts from Chuck Carlino's message of 2015-01-15 09:43:41 -0800:
On 01/15/2015 08:49 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
Clint Byrum said on Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:14:45AM -0800:
holidays. However, I believe James has demonstrated superb review skills
and a commitment to the project that shows broad
Folks,
I want to discuss possibility to add network verification status field for
environments. There are 2 reasons for this:
1) One of the most frequent reasons of deployment failure is wrong network
configuration. In the current UI network verification is completely
optional and sometimes
This is the hangout to talk about Gantt issues today.
- Forwarded message from Google+ noreply-2054f...@plus.google.com -
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:43:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Google+ noreply-2054f...@plus.google.com
To: n0...@n0ano.com
Subject: Don Dugger is inviting you to join his hangout
On 01/12/2015 06:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:28:53PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote:
On 01/05/2015 02:30 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 05:18:19PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote:
Hello,
Libvirt can create loop or nbd device for LXC container
On 12/16/2014 2:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 12/11/2014 10:36 AM, Jon Bernard wrote:
Heya, quick Ceph CI status update. Once the test_volume_boot_pattern
was marked as skipped, only the revert_resize test was failing. I have
submitted a patch to nova for this [1], and that yields an
On 2015-01-15 08:44:58 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote:
[...]
The other thing that happened was partial capping doesn't work,
because something else moves forward and breaks you from below. So
the patch will need to hit everything at once.
Right, and we _have_ to start using stable branches on
Will do.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 01/14/2015 01:06 PM, matt wrote:
Hey Mike!
Thanks for this info. Super helpful to me at least. I am very
interested
in hearing more about nova-network to neutron migrations.
-Matt
Hello Matt:
On 01/16/2015 07:39 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
In about 24 hours we've seen 9 core +1's, one non-core +1, and only one
dissenting opinion from James himself which I think we have properly
dismissed. With my nomination counting as an additional +1, that is 10,
which is 50% of the 20 cores active
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
In about 24 hours we've seen 9 core +1's, one non-core +1, and only one
dissenting opinion from James himself which I think we have properly
dismissed. With my nomination counting as an additional +1, that is 10,
which is 50%
On 01/15/2015 12:55 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 01/15/2015 09:33 AM, Brian Haley wrote:
On 01/14/2015 02:15 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 01/14/2015 12:57 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
Hi All,
I recently experienced failures getting images from Glance while spawning
instances. This step
On 01/14/2015 01:06 PM, matt wrote:
Hey Mike!
Thanks for this info. Super helpful to me at least. I am very interested
in hearing more about nova-network to neutron migrations.
-Matt
Hello Matt:
Please start attending the weekly meetings:
[from another thread]
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com wrote:
Guys,
We want to introduce an empty role as a basis for plugins. For
instance, the user select nodes, assign empty role and names it
somehow like CONTRAIL. In this step, vanilla fuel will
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Kris G. Lindgren klindg...@godaddy.com
wrote:
Is the fact that neutron security groups don’t provide the same level
of isolation as nova security groups on your guys radar?
Specifically talking about:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1274034
That
On 01/16/2015 11:31 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the core
team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so we
need to ensure cores are
+1, without Doug's help fixing everything, the services split probably
wouldn't have happened.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some
+1 to Doug’s addition. He’s been a workhorse in moving lbaas and the services
split forward and his being able to finally merge code in the main repo should
be a boon to our merge velocity.
Many thanks to Sumit for his long-serving dedication as a core reviewer. I
hope to see him return to
Can someone tell me or point me to documentation about what the
required yum and pip packages are to be able to run tox for glance,
keystone, neutron, cinder and nova on Centos 6.5 with Python 2.6? I
looked at the openstack-infra/puppet-jenkins project and thought I
installed everything
For those who haven’t seen it, I’d like to first share Jay Pipes’ unbelievably
thorough blog post on Nova update concurrency, specifically as it relates to
the issue of emitting an UPDATE on a locked” row without using SELECT..FOR
UPDATE (as well as why we *can’t* keep using SELECT..FOR
I think Oracle's got enough money to support Node.js on SPARC.
How is money relevant here?
Well, normally the argument I've received is We don't have the
time/resources/insert-other-fiscally-motivated-reason to support/work on
node. Ergo, money. But then, given Oracle's conduct around the
Hi,
I know many of us are just coming back from holiday breaks -- I
certainly am. It came up in the nova meeting this morning that we've
stopped being so reliable at reviewing the priority review etherpad
when deciding what to review. So -- it would be cool if reviewers
(everyone, not just core)
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the core
team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so we
need to ensure cores are doing reviews. The stats for the 90 day period [2]
Michael,
These wasn't on the list of of exceptions at today's nova meeting. Please
add them.
On 1/8/15, 11:48 , Tomoki Sekiyama tomoki.sekiy...@hds.com wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted 2 nova-specs [1][2] related to Cinder volumes iSCSI
multipath/failover improvement.
These specs are both for
:
POST
/services/Cloud/
host:192.168.0.4:8773
x-amz-date:20150115T233322Z
host;x-amz-date
a364b884b3e72160b8850f80c1b5b559011b38313da026d04dd60b745c0fd135
2015-01-15 23:33:22,892 euca2ools [DEBUG]:StringToSign:
AWS4-HMAC-SHA256
20150115T233322Z
20150115/168/192/aws4_request
Thanks for this, I will add it to the list.
Michael
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
I sent this at the beginning of the exception process, but it did not appear
on the list of exceptions mikal posted at today's nova meeting, so I'm
re-sending.
Begin
+1 For adding Doug as Core in Neutron!
I have seen his work on the services part and he is a great member of the
OpenStack community!
Edgar
From: Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.commailto:mest...@mestery.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hello David,
We are definitely assessing the option, although even switching Keystone
to be backed by an LDAP service might also work, and not be a switch to
a fully federated system. I believe Keystone has had LDAP support since
Havana, and that was an option we had looked at. It also might be a
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
We can side step the dependency graphing and ordering issue by looking at
the list of curently installed packages via pip freeze and not installing
dependencies (pip install --no-deps)
After looking into this further
Hi, everyone,
to unify our CI setup for fuel-ostf repository we need to backport
fixes for run_test.sh script to all stable branches.
Sebastian created corresponding reviews:
6.0 https://review.openstack.org/147510/
5.1 https://review.openstack.org/147511/
5.0
On 01/15/2015 06:25 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
We can side step the dependency graphing and ordering issue by looking
at the list of curently installed packages via pip freeze and not
installing dependencies (pip install --no-deps)
After looking into this further here are the known issues:
*
I sent this at the beginning of the exception process, but it did not appear on
the list of exceptions mikal posted at today's nova meeting, so I'm re-sending.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: January 8, 2015 at 8:50:57 AM CST
From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
On 1/15/2015 11:40 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 1/13/2015 9:27 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 1/13/2015 12:11 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:00:04AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Looks like the fix we merged didn't actually fix the problem. I have
a patch
[1] to uncap
We can side step the dependency graphing and ordering issue by looking at
the list of curently installed packages via pip freeze and not installing
dependencies (pip install --no-deps)
After looking into this further here are the known issues:
* Partial capping won't work [0], so we need to pin
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
As part of the change, I'd like to propose Doug Wiegley as a new Neutron core
reviewer. Doug has been actively reviewing code across not only all the
Neutron projects, but also other projects such as infra. His help and work in
the
All,
There is blueprint for enabling libvirt memory ballooning
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-memory-ballooning in
openstack nova. I think for Hyper-V , its already in place. Can we discuss
about the design and implementation and target for L release?
Regards,
Vikash
Hi,
I have been trying to debug the test cases in OpenStack, but I am not getting
successful with it. So if someone can help me with that. The last response from
the dev-list was to use $ ./run_tests.sh -d [test module path]
but this gives bDb quit error.
So kindly help me this.
--
Thanks
Hi,
I am bit confused regarding the testing in OpenStack. The run_tests.sh script (
that is at the root of every component may it be nova,keystone etc ) , does it
run only the unit tests covered under that component or it runs the test cases
it tempest too (for ex scenario tests, api tests
Folks,
Currently Fuel UI can handle large amounts of nodes due to a recent
refactoring - rendering and operations with nodes became much faster. But
that large amount of nodes also requires UX improvement, I'd love to hear
your ideas and opinions on these proposals:
1. Introduce compact node
We don't have asserts anywhere else. I don't think it makes sense to only
put a couple in.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Sunil Kumar su...@embrane.com wrote:
Actually, I just noticed that a patch which has been pending review
since Sep is not merged, and that actually fixes the root cause.
Dear all,
I had raised a blueprint on Horizon for adding Version Information on the
System Info Page. Its been a while and it is still in new state.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/version-info-on-system-info-page
Please provide your thoughts on this and also if it can be
Hi, all
Intel PCI CI use hardware machine to testing PCI, there are some
change to devstack, tempest
use Jerkins dispatch task.
basic information:
* the topology:
log server --- Jenkins server node pool
* use devstack deploy testing env.
PCI CI 's main problem is how to know
在 2015年01月13日 03:12, Kurt Taylor 写道:
The public link for your test logs should really be a host name
instead of an IP address. That way if you have to change it again in
the future, you won't have dead links in old comments. You may already
know, but all of the requirements and recommendations
I agree with the proposed changes.
I would also like to take a chance to thank Sumit for the effort he has put
in this project over several years - he has been in the core team since the
project's inception and has been a witness of all its developments - both
the good and the bad ones!
You are right.
run_tests.sh simply runs unit tests which cover tempest's code itself.
In order to run the tests for the various OpenStack services, use tox.
In tox.ini there are several environments defined which run different sets
of tests.
When all you want to do is run just a specific test
Hi,
Thanks a lot. I have some more doubts if you can please clear them too.
Q1. How can we debug
test cases in OpenStack ? (We can debug the code through import pdb
but the same doesn't work for test cases and we have a bdb quit
error)
Q2. Suppose I need
to add a test case in the tempest
Hi guys,
I am referring to the blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnetodb/+spec/row-expiration . We want
to provide our end users with ttl feature on a row in MagnetoDB.
As it stands today in cassandra, ttl is on a column basis rather than a row
basis. i.e. when you insert a row with
+1
On 15 January 2015 at 14:46, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote:
+1 For adding Doug as Core in Neutron!
I have seen his work on the services part and he is a great member of
the OpenStack community!
Edgar
From: Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
Reply-To: OpenStack
Folks,
We use YAQL in Mistral for referencing variables, expressing conditions, etc.
Murano is using it extensively, I saw Heat folks thought of using it, at least
once :) May be others...
We are learning that YAQL incredibly powerful comparing to alternatives like
Jinja2 templates used in
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Andrey Danin ada...@mirantis.com wrote:
Answers inline.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
Empty role is ready [1], thanks to granular deployment feature
I didn't have to hardcode some hacks in Astute again.
But there
On 01/16/2015 09:19 AM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
Is the fact that neutron security groups don’t provide the same level of
isolation as nova security groups on your guys radar?
Specifically talking about: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1274034
I am sure their are a few other
On 13/01/2015 3:45 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
There's really no way to _force_ official logging on all
project-related channels. People who are opposed to the idea simply
move their conversations to new channels. They'll straddle the line
between somewhat official looking and
Done.
Cheers,
Michael
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Tomoki Sekiyama
tomoki.sekiy...@hds.com wrote:
Michael,
These wasn't on the list of of exceptions at today's nova meeting. Please
add them.
On 1/8/15, 11:48 , Tomoki Sekiyama tomoki.sekiy...@hds.com wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted 2
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:13 PM, John Warren jswar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Can someone tell me or point me to documentation about what the required
yum and pip packages are to be able to run tox for glance, keystone,
neutron, cinder and nova on Centos 6.5 with Python 2.6? I looked at
Hi, Swami,
The use case for central south-north mode: 1) All compute nodes not connecting
to external network directly 2) FIP/SNAT/VPN function will be done centrally
on hardware router.
New questions about “We were even initially planning to distribute the SNAT”
Do you mean: 1) Dynamic
All we need is to have someone spend some time to make it possible to have
a common meta files(configs, package descriptions, etc.) so that they can
be interchangeable and used by both Bower and pip, e.g. some tool to sync
changes made in one config and adding it to another. Then - whoever prefers
Ops, sent the prev mail before finishing it...
1. Development - all we need is versions of uncompressed js and css files.
We can use bower or pip requirements to get specific versions.
2. Testing - we need to do first some 'uglify'-ing tasks, using pyscss or
grunt and to run tests on that. Is is
On 14/01/15 05:46 -0700, Boden Russell wrote:
On 1/14/15 1:38 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/01/15 21:24 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 01/13/2015 04:55 PM, Boden Russell wrote:
Looking for some feedback from the glance dev team on a potential BP…
This is the solution that I would recommend.
+1
how about the deep dependency? for example, we depends package A, and pin
it, but A-B-C, then B and C are not pined since they are not directly
depended, then what should we do? pin everything?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Eventlet released 0.16.1
Answers inline.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
Empty role is ready [1], thanks to granular deployment feature
I didn't have to hardcode some hacks in Astute again.
But there are several things which I want to mention/discuss:
1. in the patch you
Hi,
Do we have plan for centos 7 ?
Regards,
apporc
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
On 01/15/2015 10:35 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
So how could we have avoided this problem? By capping stable branch
requirements so we only have to worry about uncapped dependencies on
master. Capping stable branches has been previous discussed but no
action has been taken. So going forward I
Hello openstackers,
MagnetoDB team is happy to announce the release of kilo-1 milestone [1]
This milestone we focused on operability and monitoring aspects of
MagnetoDB.
* Backup/Restore API has been introduced
* Monitoring API has been introduced and implemented for Cassandra
* The API URI
On 14/01/15 23:05, david.co...@oracle.com wrote:
I'm not particularly well-versed in the Horizon build process so
perhaps I'm way off base. But given that a distribution's Horizon build
package embeds various JavaScript libraries to be used by the browser,
how those libraries are obtained
Hello,
I’m testing gnocchi to work with ceilometer these days and I have some concerns
about its performance.
I noticed in the code, every time a measure gets updated, gnocchi first reads
all the previous contents of that measure, updates the measure in memory and
writes the updated contents
On Thu, Jan 15 2015, 张灿 wrote:
Hi,
I noticed in the code, every time a measure gets updated, gnocchi first reads
all the previous contents of that measure, updates the measure in memory and
writes the updated contents as well as original contents back. IMHO, the
overhead here could be very
On Jan 15, 2015, at 18:46, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
Yep, that's the main downside of the use of the Carbonara based backend
in Gnocchi. But honestly, since it's download/upload are parallel and
the file size is quite small, sending a metric should be pretty fast in
most
Eventlet released 0.16.1 on 2015-01-14 [0], which removed a deprecated API
that nova stable/* still used. This caused nova-compute in stable/juno and
stable/icehouse to crash thus breaking grenade on master. In 24 hours this
bug caused 671 grenade jobs to fail[1]!
After some quick debugging of
The stable/havana branch of devstack was deleted when the stable/havana
branches of the projects were end of lifed.
Even if you could reconstruct it, it wouldn't work, because various
dependencies would have upgraded to incompatible versions.
stable/icehouse is the oldest version of OpenStack
On 01/15/2015 01:42 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
The stable/havana branch of devstack was deleted when the stable/havana
branches of the projects were end of lifed.
That said, tag is still there:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/devstack/tag/?id=havana-eol
Hi Eduard,
Can you put the logs or details for below comment:
it seems that sometimes Zuul gets stuck (sometimes in Looking for lost
builds, sometimes doing nothing) and it misses notifications.
I guess, we too have been facing the same issue with Zuul.
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.*
CentOS 7 is not considered as essential / critical priority blueprint for
Fuel 6.1. There is a plan to support new version of CentOS, and I know some
folks started a research/move in this direction in some areas, such as
l23network puppet module for instance.
It would be great to see help to make
On 01/15/2015 05:21 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 01/15/2015 10:35 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
So how could we have avoided this problem? By capping stable branch
requirements so we only have to worry about uncapped dependencies on
master. Capping stable branches has been previous discussed but no
Hi,
Yes, we do have a plan for CentOS 7, but as far as I know it was
postponed to MOS 7.0. That means we will not have Cent OS 7 in
upcoming release.
- Igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, me,apporc appleorchard2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Do we have plan for centos 7 ?
Regards,
apporc
I'm also facing the same trouble.
On Jan 15, 2015 12:05 PM, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com wrote:
No
I want Havana purposefully.
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:45 AM, iKhan ik.ibadk...@gmail.com wrote:
Go with stable/icehouse then.
On Thu Jan 15 2015 at 11:13:37 AM masoom alam
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:36 PM, abhishek jain ashujain9...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm also facing the same trouble.
On Jan 15, 2015 12:05 PM, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com wrote:
No
I want Havana purposefully.
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:45 AM, iKhan ik.ibadk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ramy,
The issue with disconnect/abort no longer happens, so i guess it was some
issues with networking.
Regarding the ssh keys i finally used Jenkins Configuration Provider Plugin
to inject ssh keys as a pre-build step, then i added a manual execution
step to scp the logs to the server, so
Hi,
Just so i don't start another thread: it seems that sometimes Zuul gets
stuck (sometimes in Looking for lost builds, sometimes doing nothing) and
it misses notifications.
I added a Jenkins timer job to restart it every 30 minutes. Is there a fix
for this or something to change in config?
On Thu, Jan 15 2015, 张灿 wrote:
As a further question, how do you estimate the storage impact of a vm
instance’s metrics? I’m not very sure about the `back_window` and `definition`
part, could you clarify that for me?
That defines the number of measure (data points) that are stored for
each
On 01/15/2015 08:38 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
The policy decision to cap stable requirements was agreed to previously
(and at summit this year), it just needs someone to implement.
+1
We started to implement it (in Oslo libraries iirc) and then reverted
because we
Sean Dague wrote:
The policy decision to cap stable requirements was agreed to previously
(and at summit this year), it just needs someone to implement.
+1
We started to implement it (in Oslo libraries iirc) and then reverted
because we encountered problems. We concluded a proper cross-project
Hi Amit,
This is the only logging i see:
2015-01-15 14:48:28,034 DEBUG zuul.Gerrit: Change Change 0x7fa0bac97a50
146404,10 status: NEW
2015-01-15 14:48:28,035 INFO zuul.Gerrit: Updating information for 146460,5
2015-01-15 14:51:07,851 DEBUG zuul.Gearman: Looking for lost builds
2015-01-15
Big +1, it would save me a lot of debugging time :)
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh
vkramsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Folks,
I want to discuss possibility to add network verification status field for
environments. There are 2 reasons for this:
1) One of the most frequent
On 01/14/2015 08:40 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
The point was brought up that some recommendations that the working group
forms will be jarring for APIs to implement when going from vN.* to vN+1.0
for both developers and consumers. Client libraries often provide
compatibility (or upgrade-path)
On 01/14/2015 02:15 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 01/14/2015 12:57 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
Hi All,
I recently experienced failures getting images from Glance while spawning
instances. This step comes after building the networks in the guild sequence.
When the Glance failure
*Note: A more detailed email about this has been sent to all Cinder
volume driver maintainers directly.*
In the Jan 14th 2015 16:00 UTC Cinder IRC meeting [1], it was agreed
by Cinder core and participating vendors that the deadline for vendors
to have a third party CI would be:
March 19th 2015
98 matches
Mail list logo
